The present disclosure is related to a radiolucent platform for a surgical table. More specifically, the present disclosure is related to a radiolucent structure which attaches to a surgical table in order to support the torso of a patient positioned on the table for improved imaging access during spinal or neurosurgery.
Typical surgical tables used for orthopedic surgery are constructed from two telescoping columns mounted on a cart base and a rectangular-shaped radiolucent tubular support frame. Accessories are available to be mounted to the table frame to provide padded points for supporting a patient.
Other surgical tables used for general surgery have metal accessory rails and generally a metallic framework. The metallic framework limits x-ray imaging of a patient during surgery due to interference of the metallic components.
Extensions and radiolucent attachments have been developed for use with the general surgical tables to provide improved x-ray imaging such as is available on the typical orthopedic surgical tables. A diversity of manufacturers have proliferated a number of different dimensions and standards for accessories to be attached. This reduces the ability of a hospital to use standard accessories across multiple surgical platforms. However, many surgical table manufacturers have standardized rail sizes and widths.
With regard to spinal surgery specifically, the two most common types of lumbar spine surgery procedures are trans-vertebral fusions and inter-body micro-diskectoies. In a trans-vertebral, two vertebrae are fused together, which is best performed when the patient's spine is positioned in a natural “swayback” state. During an interbody micro-disketomy a small portion of the intervertebral disk is removed to alleviate pain; thereby making it beneficial to position the patient in a somewhat fetal or flexed position to stretch open the bony facets of the back.
The present application discloses one or more of the features recited in the appended claims and/or the following features which, alone or in any combination, may comprise patentable subject matter:
In one aspect of this disclosure, a cantilevered support for use with a surgical table includes a first radiolucent beam having a longitudinal axis and a second radiolucent beam having a longitudinal axis. The first beam and second beam are each coupled to the deck and extend outwardly therefrom in a cantilevered configuration. The longitudinal axis of the second beam is oriented generally parallel to longitudinal axis of the first beam. The first and second beams are configured to cooperate to support a patient support accessory. The cantilevered support also includes means for coupling the cantilevered support to a deck of the surgical table such that substantially all the load borne by the patient-support accessory is transferred through the beams directly to the deck.
In some embodiments, the means for coupling the cantilevered support to the deck comprises first and second receivers coupled to the first and second radiolucent beams respectively. The first and second receivers are configured to engage first and second spars of the surgical table, respectively, to support the cantilevered portion from the deck.
In other embodiments, the means for coupling the cantilevered support to the deck comprises a first coupler coupled to the first beam and a second coupler coupled to the second beam. The first and second couplers are configured to engage a portion of a deck of the surgical table to secure the cantilevered support to the deck. The first and second couplers each comprise a clamp mechanism including a manual actuator configured to adjust the pressure of the clamp mechanism to secure the coupler to the deck. In some embodiments, the clamp mechanism comprises a first grip and a second grip movable relative to the first grip the second grip including a tapered surface for locating the coupler on an accessory rail of the deck.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, a patient-support apparatus comprises an adjustable pedestal and a deck, the deck formed to include a main portion secured to the pedestal and a cantilevered portion. The cantilevered portion includes a first radiolucent beam having a longitudinal axis and secured to the main portion so that the first radiolucent beam extends outwardly from the main portion in a cantilevered configuration. The cantilevered portion also includes a second radiolucent beam having a longitudinal axis and secured to the main portion so that the second radiolucent beam extends outwardly from the main portion in a cantilevered configuration. The longitudinal axis of the second beam is oriented generally parallel to longitudinal axis of the first beam. The first and second beams are configured to cooperate to support a patient support accessory such that substantially all the load borne by the patient-support accessory is transferred through the beams directly to the main portion.
In some embodiments, the beams are laterally spaced apart to form a space therebetween. The cantilevered portion of the deck extends a sufficient distance from the main portion of the deck to support the upper body of a patient for spinal surgery. In some embodiments, the cantilevered portion is formed to include a cross-member extending between the beams distally from the main portion. The top surfaces of the main portion, the first beam, the second beam and the cross-beam may all be substantially coplanar.
In some embodiments, the deck comprises a carbon-fiber composite material. In some embodiments, each of the beams consists of a carbon-fiber composite material. The patient-support apparatus may further comprise a patient support accessory configured to support a patient in a prone position, the patient support accessory supported on the first and second rails and movable along the longitudinal axis of the rails. For example, the patient support accessory may be a head support. In some embodiments, the patient support accessory is configured to be clamped to the rails. The cantilevered portion of the deck may extend outwardly from the main portion to form a clearance between the cantilevered portion and a floor supporting the patient-support apparatus to provide 360 degrees of imaging access about a patient supported on the cantilevered portion.
In yet another aspect of the present disclosure, a patient-support apparatus comprises an adjustable pedestal, a deck supported on the pedestal, and a cantilevered support coupled to the deck. The cantilevered support includes a first radiolucent beam having a longitudinal axis and a second radiolucent beam having a longitudinal axis. The first and second beams are coupled to the deck and extend outwardly therefrom in a cantilevered configuration. The longitudinal axis of the second beam oriented generally parallel to longitudinal axis of the first beam. The first and second beams configured to cooperate to support a patient support accessory such that substantially all the load borne by the patient-support accessory is transferred through the beams directly to the deck.
In some embodiments, the patient-support apparatus further comprises first and second spars extending from the deck and adjustable relative to the deck and the first and second radiolucent beams are coupled to the first and second spars respectively. The cantilevered portion may include first and second receivers coupled to the first and second radiolucent beams respectively. The first and second receivers may be configured to engage the first and second spars, respectively, to support the cantilevered portion from the deck. The receivers may be formed to include an interior space sized to receive a portion of the spars when the cantilevered portion is coupled to the deck such that the receivers are secured to the spars. The spars may be pivotable relative to the deck.
In some embodiments, the deck includes a main portion supported on the pedestal and an adjustable portion pivotable relative to the main portion. The cantilevered support may be coupled to the adjustable portion of the deck. The cantilevered support may include a first coupler coupled to the first beam and a second coupler coupled to the second beam. The first and second couplers may be configured to engage a portion of the adjustable portion of the deck to secure the cantilevered support to the deck.
The first and second couplers may each comprise a clamp mechanism including a manual actuator configured to adjust the pressure of the clamp mechanism to secure the coupler to the adjustable portion of the deck. The adjustable deck may include an accessory rail and the clamp mechanisms of the first and second couplers may secure the cantilevered support to the accessory rail.
In some embodiments, a clamp mechanism comprises a first grip and a second grip movable relative to the first grip the second grip including a tapered surface for locating the coupler on the accessory rail of the adjustable portion of the deck. The first and second couplers may be configured to position the cantilevered support such that an upper surface of each of the first and second beams is positioned vertically below the upper surface of a portion of the deck when the deck and cantilevered support are in a level position.
In still yet another aspect of the present disclosure, an accessory platform is used with a surgical table having a radiolucent deck section. The platform comprises a plurality of generally parallel radiolucent support beams spaced apart, and a plurality of clamp mechanisms interconnecting the support beams the clamp mechanisms configured to secure the platform to the deck section of the surgical table.
In some embodiments, the support beams each have a longitudinal length and the clamping mechanisms are configured to cooperate to align the longitudinal length of the beams with a longitudinal length of the deck of the surgical table. In some embodiments, the platform includes a patient support accessory supported on the beams. The platform is configured such that the platform supports a patient in a prone position such that a portion of the patient is spaced vertically above an upper surface of the deck of the surgical table.
In some embodiments, the support beams are segmented and hinged to permit the segments to be articulated relative to one another. The segmented support beams may be movable and the movement of the segments relative to one another may be driven.
In some embodiments, the clamp mechanism includes a first grip secured to a first beam, a block secured to a second beam, a cross-beam connecting the first grip and the block, the cross-beam generally perpendicular to the first and second beams, and a second grip coupled to the block. The second grip may be movable relative thereto vary a distance between the first and second grips to secure the platform to the deck of the surgical table. The clamp mechanism may include an actuator for moving the second grip relative to the block. The actuator may include a threaded rod and a spherical portion, and wherein the threaded rod is received in the block and rotation of the threaded rod causes the spherical portion to act on the second grip to vary the distance between the first and second grips.
Additional features, which alone or in combination with any other feature(s), including those listed above and those listed in the claims, may comprise patentable subject matter and will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the invention as presently perceived.
The detailed description particularly refers to the accompanying figures in which:
A patient-support apparatus 40 illustratively embodied as a surgical table 40 includes a pedestal 44 and a radiolucent deck 52 as shown in
The surgical table 40 is configured such that a cantilevered portion 54 of the deck 52 extends from a main portion 50 of the deck 52 so that the cantilevered portion 54 is not supported from directly beneath the cantilevered portion 54. The cantilevered configuration of the deck 52 permits access for imaging equipment, such as radiographic equipment, for example, to have unobstructed access to the cantilevered portion 54 of the deck 52. This allows a surgeon, to perform a procedure on a patient supported on the surgical table 40 with full access of imaging during the procedure. Various pads, cushions, or mattresses may be placed on the deck 52. Positioning of a patient on the deck 52 is often accomplished by placement of the various cushions or pads.
In the illustrative embodiment of
As shown in
In the illustrative embodiment, the cross-beam 62, bracket 60, and clamps 64 cooperate to define an adjustable width clamp mechanism 70 that enables the platform 56 to be secured to the outer edges 68 and 69 of the radiolucent surgical table 40. In some embodiments, a hook and loop style fastener system (not shown) may be employed to secure the table accessory platform 56 to the radiolucent surgical table 40.
The adjustable width clamp mechanism 70 is activated by an actuator 72 on the clamp 64 to move a grip 74 in the direction of an arrow 76 in
The threaded shaft 84 engages a threaded hole 94 of a coupler 92. Threaded shaft 84 has an axis 90 about which threaded shaft 84 is rotated to cause the threaded shaft 84 to tighten or loosen the grip 74 by shortening or lengthening the distance between the grip 74 and a grip 96 formed in a block 98 of the bracket 60. The distance between the grips 74 and 96 is identified by a reference designator 100. Tightening of the clamp 64 causes the distance between the grips 74 and 96 to be reduced such that the grips 74 and 96 engage the edges 68 and 69 respectively of the deck 52. With sufficient pressure applied by the grips 74 and 96, the platform 56 is secured to the deck 52.
The cross-beams 62 comprise a tubular member 102 which is coupled to both the couplers 92, 92 and blocks 86 and 98 through fasteners 104, 106 and 108. The tubular member 102 in the illustrative embodiment is an extruded aluminum tube. Other suitable materials may be substituted in some embodiments. A cover 110 is coupled to the upper side 112 of tubular member 102. Fasteners 106 in both of the blocks 86 and 98 engage the lateral beams 58 and 59.
In the illustrative embodiment, beams 58 and 59 are substantially radiolucent and are spaced with an inside spacing of approximately 14½ inches. In other embodiments, a different inside spacing may be employed. In some embodiments, clamps 64 may be omitted and platform 56 may couple mechanically to surgical table 40. In some embodiments, beams 58 and 59 may be segmented and/or hinged so that segments of the beams 58 and 59 may be articulated relative to other segments of the beams 58 and 59. When the beams 58 and 59 are segmented, platform 56 may have an interface or linkage to allow beam 58 segments to be driven and locked. Segments may be driven remotely. It is within the scope of this disclosure for the platform 56 to be either fixed to deck 52 or removably coupled.
In another embodiment shown in
It should be noted that the beams 158 and 159 support a significant portion of the load of the patient supported on the surgical table 140 and all of the load of the patient applied to the accessories 66 and other similar accessories is borne by the beams 158 and 159 and transferred to the main portion 150 of the deck 152. This cantilevered arrangement provides a region 162 of access for imaging devices such that a patient may be subjected to imaging procedures without having to be repositioned during the spinal or other neurosurgery activities. Thus, a physician may check for proper placement of repair materials such as implants, or check for proper alignment of spinal structures of the patient throughout a surgical procedure. In the illustrative embodiment, cantilevered portion 154 further includes a cross-beam 164 coupled to each of the beams 158 and 159 distal from the main portion 150. Cross-beam 164 provides a mounting point for other accessories such as various head supports known in the art. In the illustrative embodiment, a head support 166 is supported on the beams 158 and 159 such that a patient may be placed in a prone position on the accessories 66, 66 with the patient's head resting in the head support 166.
In still another embodiment of a surgical table 240 shown in
It should also be understood that the spars 200 and 202 may be positioned below the upper surface 210 of the remainder of the surgical table 240. In addition, while the spars 200 and 202 are shown as male members and the receivers 260 and 262 are shown as female members, the sexes of the spars 200, 202 and receivers 260, 262 could be reversed in some embodiments.
In the illustrative embodiment of
Referring now to
The cantilevered support 356 includes two couplers 358 and 359 which are configured to secure the cantilevered support 356 to the adjustable deck section 354. The adjustable deck section 354 is pivotable relative the remainder of the deck 352 about an axis 360 which is transverse to the longitudinal length of the deck 352. The adjustable deck section 356 is movable relative to the deck 352 between a lowered position shown in
The cantilevered support 356 is shown in
Referring now to
The manner of attachment of couplers 358 and 359 to beams 464 and 466 is the same manner that the receivers 260 and 262 are attached to the beams 358 and 359.
Each of the couplers 358 and 359 include a clamping mechanism 500 as shown in
Although certain illustrative embodiments have been described in detail above, variations and modifications exist within the scope and spirit of this disclosure as described and as defined in the following claims.
This application is a U.S. national counterpart application of international application serial no. PCT/US2008/074028 filed Aug. 22, 2008, which claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §119(e), of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/957,882 filed Aug. 24, 2007 and U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/075,381 filed Jun. 25, 2008, which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/074028 | 8/22/2008 | WO | 00 | 2/22/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/029524 | 3/5/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
870324 | Thorner | Nov 1907 | A |
2188592 | Cunningham | Jan 1940 | A |
2509086 | Eaton | May 1950 | A |
2688142 | Jensen | Sep 1954 | A |
2872259 | Thorpe | Feb 1959 | A |
2935286 | Parsons | May 1960 | A |
3015113 | Wallen | Jan 1962 | A |
3042025 | Jackson | Jul 1962 | A |
3046072 | Douglass, Jr. et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3099441 | Ries | Jul 1963 | A |
3188079 | Boetcker et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3493225 | Ceraldi | Feb 1970 | A |
3811140 | Burpo | May 1974 | A |
3828377 | Fary, Sr. | Aug 1974 | A |
3873081 | Smith | Mar 1975 | A |
3946452 | Eary, Sr. | Mar 1976 | A |
3947686 | Cooper et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4018412 | Kees, Jr. et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4028754 | Eary, Sr. | Jun 1977 | A |
4033339 | Roberts et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4054282 | Hamer | Oct 1977 | A |
4108426 | Lindstroem et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4139917 | Fenwick | Feb 1979 | A |
4143652 | Meier et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4225125 | Lee | Sep 1980 | A |
4239200 | Sarrafian et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4346488 | Eary, Sr. | Aug 1982 | A |
4355631 | LeVahn | Oct 1982 | A |
4383351 | Fenwick | May 1983 | A |
4391438 | Heffington, Jr. | Jul 1983 | A |
4398707 | Cloward | Aug 1983 | A |
D271834 | Huntsinger | Dec 1983 | S |
4455698 | Eary, Sr. | Jun 1984 | A |
4474364 | Brendgord | Oct 1984 | A |
4484911 | Berlin et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4487523 | Monroe | Dec 1984 | A |
4506872 | Westerberg et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4520800 | Kowalski | Jun 1985 | A |
4526355 | Moore et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4527555 | Ruf | Jul 1985 | A |
4527787 | Collis, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4531247 | Eary, Sr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4549501 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4558857 | Heller | Dec 1985 | A |
4559930 | Cobiski | Dec 1985 | A |
4562588 | Ruf | Dec 1985 | A |
4579111 | Ledesma | Apr 1986 | A |
4583725 | Arnold | Apr 1986 | A |
4616813 | McConnell | Oct 1986 | A |
4635914 | Kabanek | Jan 1987 | A |
4653482 | Kurland | Mar 1987 | A |
4662619 | Ray et al. | May 1987 | A |
4671728 | Clark et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4712781 | Watanabe | Dec 1987 | A |
4729535 | Frazier et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4752064 | Voss | Jun 1988 | A |
4796846 | Heier et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4827541 | Vollman et al. | May 1989 | A |
4840362 | Bremer et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4840363 | McConnell | Jun 1989 | A |
4852840 | Marks | Aug 1989 | A |
4866796 | Robinson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872656 | Brendgord et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4901963 | Yoder | Feb 1990 | A |
4901964 | McConnell | Feb 1990 | A |
4908892 | Michelson | Mar 1990 | A |
4923187 | Mombrinie | May 1990 | A |
4971037 | Pelta | Nov 1990 | A |
4989848 | Monroe | Feb 1991 | A |
4995067 | Royster et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5009407 | Watanabe | Apr 1991 | A |
5014375 | Coonrad et al. | May 1991 | A |
5088706 | Jackson | Feb 1992 | A |
5108213 | Shields | Apr 1992 | A |
5121892 | Herzog | Jun 1992 | A |
5131106 | Jackson | Jul 1992 | A |
5135210 | Michelson | Aug 1992 | A |
5163193 | Whitmore | Nov 1992 | A |
5197975 | Mombrinie | Mar 1993 | A |
5239716 | Fisk | Aug 1993 | A |
5276927 | Day | Jan 1994 | A |
5279310 | Hsien | Jan 1994 | A |
5287575 | Allen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297303 | Stafford et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297539 | Liebl et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5320444 | Bookwalter et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5367730 | Sher | Nov 1994 | A |
5400772 | LeVahn et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5444882 | Andrews et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452728 | Iams | Sep 1995 | A |
5489258 | Wohnsen et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5509160 | Schubert | Apr 1996 | A |
5520623 | Williams | May 1996 | A |
5535466 | Snell | Jul 1996 | A |
5538215 | Hosey | Jul 1996 | A |
5566682 | Yavitz | Oct 1996 | A |
5575027 | Mueller | Nov 1996 | A |
5584302 | Sillaway et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5613254 | Clayman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628078 | Pennington et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642302 | Dumont et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5655238 | Stickley et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658315 | Lamb et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5675851 | Feathers | Oct 1997 | A |
5680861 | Rohling | Oct 1997 | A |
5701991 | Helmetsle | Dec 1997 | A |
5741210 | Dobrovolny | Apr 1998 | A |
5758374 | Ronci | Jun 1998 | A |
5758647 | Cummins | Jun 1998 | A |
5836026 | Reed | Nov 1998 | A |
5836559 | Ronci | Nov 1998 | A |
5926876 | Haigh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
D414974 | Marrone, II et al. | Oct 1999 | S |
6001076 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003174 | Kantrowitz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6047420 | Priester, III et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6065165 | Delk et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076525 | Hoffman | Jun 2000 | A |
6120397 | Julian | Sep 2000 | A |
6154901 | Carr | Dec 2000 | A |
6154903 | Wai-Chung | Dec 2000 | A |
6195820 | Heimbrock et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199233 | Kantrowitz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199552 | Crespo | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6237172 | Morgan, Sr. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260220 | Lamb et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295671 | Reesby et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324710 | Hernandez et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336412 | Heimbrock et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6382576 | Heimbrock | May 2002 | B1 |
6385802 | Roberts et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6428497 | Crouch | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6490737 | Mazzel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6526609 | Wong | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6557195 | Dinkler | May 2003 | B2 |
6584630 | Dinkler | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6622324 | VanSteenburg et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622980 | Boucher et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6637058 | Lamb | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6663055 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6691350 | Weismiller | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701553 | Hand et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718581 | Riach | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6754923 | Borders et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6813788 | Dinkler et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7017211 | Krywiczanin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020917 | Kolody et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7520007 | Skripps | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7520008 | Wong et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7600281 | Skripps | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7669262 | Skripps et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20020032927 | Dinkler | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020061225 | Boucher et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061255 | Nguyen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020170115 | Borders et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030061660 | Easterling | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030167569 | Newkirk et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040123389 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133979 | Newkirk et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133983 | Newkirk et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050160533 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060253985 | Skripps | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080078031 | Weinstein et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005020819 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT International Application Serial No. PCT/US2008/074028 Completed Oct. 28, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Feb. 24, 2010 for PCT/US2008/074028. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110119829 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61075381 | Jun 2008 | US | |
60957882 | Aug 2007 | US |