This application relates generally to surgical tools that can be employed for use in minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures and, more particularly, to surgical tools with a handle and a frame and an input joint situated therebetween.
Surgical tools are often designed and constructed with various components to have certain kinematic architectures at the handle and frame, and to ultimately furnish certain functionalities and performances at an end effector. Particular functionality assets and drawbacks can arise among the architectures depending on how the handle and frame and components are arranged and configured with respect to one another.
In an embodiment, a surgical tool assembly may include a handle assembly, a frame assembly, an articulation input joint, and an axial grounding joint. The frame assembly has a shaft. The shaft establishes an x-axis. The articulation input joint is situated between the handle assembly and the frame assembly. The articulation input joint provides a pitch rotation between the handle assembly and the frame assembly. The articulation input joint provides a yaw rotation between the handle assembly and the frame assembly. The articulation input joint establishes a first virtual center. The axial grounding joint is situated between the handle assembly and the frame assembly. The handle assembly has a translational constraint along the x-axis with respect to the frame assembly by way of the axial grounding joint. The axial grounding joint establishes a second virtual center.
In an embodiment, a pitch motion path of the articulation input joint and a yaw motion path of the articulation input joint exhibit a parallel kinematic arrangement with respect to each other.
In an embodiment, a pitch motion path of the articulation input joint and a yaw motion path of the articulation input joint exhibit a serial kinematic arrangement with respect to each other.
In an embodiment, rigid body motion transmission paths effected and furnished by way of the axial grounding joint exhibit a parallel kinematic arrangement.
In an embodiment, rigid body motion transmission paths effected and furnished by way of the axial grounding joint exhibit a serial kinematic arrangement.
In an embodiment, the handle assembly is translationally constrained along a y-axis with respect to the frame assembly by way of the axial grounding joint.
In an embodiment, the handle assembly is translationally constrained along a z-axis with respect to the frame assembly by way of the axial grounding joint.
In an embodiment, the articulation input joint and the axial grounding joint exhibit a parallel arrangement with respect to each other between the handle assembly and the frame assembly.
In an embodiment, the first virtual center of the articulation input joint and the second virtual center of the axial grounding joint exhibit a generally coincident arrangement with respect to each other.
In an embodiment, an axis of the handle assembly exhibits a generally intersecting arrangement with the first virtual center and with the second virtual center.
In an embodiment, the shaft's x-axis exhibits a generally intersecting arrangement with the first virtual center and with the second virtual center.
In an embodiment, the first virtual center of the articulation input joint resides at a location that is occupied by the handle assembly, or that is occupied by a user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly, or that is occupied by both the handle assembly and by a user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly.
In an embodiment, the second virtual center of the axial grounding joint resides at a location that is occupied by the handle assembly, or that is occupied by a user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly, or that is occupied by both the handle assembly and by a user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly.
In an embodiment, a first intermediate body is provided and a second intermediate body is provided. The first intermediate body extends from the handle assembly. The first intermediate body and the second intermediate body are connected to each other by way of a first joint. The first intermediate body has a first pitch or yaw rotational degree of freedom with respect to the second intermediate body by way of the first joint.
In an embodiment, a third intermediate body is provided. The second intermediate body and the third intermediate body are connected to each other by way of a second joint. The second intermediate body has a second pitch or yaw rotational degree of freedom with respect to the third intermediate body by way of the second joint. The first and second pitch or yaw rotational degrees of freedom are contrary with respect to each other, and opposite in nature relative to each other.
In an embodiment, the third intermediate body extends from a frame of the frame assembly.
In an embodiment, the first intermediate body is fixed to the handle assembly. The third intermediate body is fixed to the shaft.
In an embodiment, the surgical tool assembly is a handheld surgical tool assembly. The surgical tool assembly lacks a wrist grounding component that would otherwise be utilized during use of the surgical tool assembly.
In an embodiment, a surgical tool assembly may include a handle assembly, a frame assembly, one or more intermediate bodies, multiple joints, an articulation input joint, and a grounding joint. The intermediate body(ies) is coupled between the handle assembly and the frame assembly. The joints reside among the handle assembly, the frame assembly, and the intermediate body(ies). The articulation input joint is established between the handle assembly and the frame assembly by way of the intermediate body(ies) and by way of the joints. The articulation input joint provides a pitch rotational degree of freedom, or provides a yaw rotational degree of freedom, or provides both a pitch and a yaw rotational degree of freedom at one or more of the joints. The articulation input joint further provides a pitch rotational degree of freedom, or provides a yaw rotational degree of freedom, or provides both a pitch and a yaw rotational degree of freedom at one or more of another of the joints. The articulation input joint has a first virtual center. The grounding joint is established between the handle assembly and the frame assembly by way of the intermediate body(ies) and by way of the joints. The grounding joint has a second virtual center.
In an embodiment, the first virtual center of the articulation input joint and the second virtual center of the grounding joint exhibit a generally coincident arrangement with respect to each other.
In an embodiment, the handle assembly establishes a first axis. A shaft of the frame assembly establishes a second axis. The first axis generally intersects the first virtual center of the articulation input joint and generally intersects the second virtual center of the grounding joint. Likewise, the second axis generally intersects the first virtual center of the articulation input joint and generally intersects the second virtual center of the grounding joint.
In an embodiment, the handle assembly is translationally constrained along an x-axis with respect to the frame assembly by way of the grounding joint. The handle assembly is translationally constrained along a y-axis with respect to the frame assembly by way of the grounding joint. And the handle assembly is translationally constrained along a z-axis relative to the frame assembly by way of the grounding joint.
In an embodiment, the articulation input joint and the grounding joint exhibit a parallel arrangement with respect to each other between the handle assembly and the frame assembly.
In an embodiment, the joints include a first joint and a second joint. The first joint resides between the handle assembly and the intermediate body(ies). The first joint provides the pitch rotational degree of freedom or provides the yaw rotational degree of freedom. The second joint resides between the frame assembly and the intermediate body(ies). The second joint provides the other of the pitch rotational degree of freedom or the yaw rotational degree of freedom, whichever is contrary to that provided by the first joint.
In an embodiment, the intermediate body(ies) includes a first intermediate body, a second intermediate body, and a third intermediate body. The joints include a first joint and a second joint. The first intermediate body is an extension of the handle assembly. The second intermediate body is an extension of the frame assembly. The first joint resides between the first intermediate body and the third intermediate body. The second joint resides between the second intermediate body and the third intermediate body. The first joint provides the pitch rotational degree of freedom or provides the yaw rotational degree of freedom of the first intermediate body with respect to the third intermediate body. The second joint provides the other of the pitch rotational degree of freedom or the yaw rotational degree of freedom, whichever is contrary to that provided by the first joint, of the third intermediate body with respect to the second intermediate body.
In an embodiment, the first virtual center of the articulation input joint resides at a location that is occupied by the handle assembly, or that is occupied by a user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly, or that is occupied by both the handle assembly and by a user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly. In a similar manner, the second virtual center of the grounding joint resides at a location that is occupied by the handle assembly, or that is occupied by a user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly, or that is occupied by both the handle assembly and by a user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly.
In an embodiment, a surgical tool assembly may include a handle assembly, a frame assembly, a first intermediate rigid body, a second intermediate rigid body, a third intermediate rigid body, a first joint, and a second joint. The first intermediate rigid body extends from the handle assembly. The second intermediate rigid body extends from the frame assembly. The first joint resides between the first intermediate rigid body and the third intermediate rigid body. The first joint provides a pitch rotational degree of freedom, or provides a yaw rotational degree of freedom, or provides both a pitch and a yaw rotational degree of freedom of the first intermediate rigid body with respect to the third intermediate rigid body. The second joint resides between the second intermediate rigid body and the third intermediate rigid body. The second joint provides a pitch rotational degree of freedom, or provides a yaw rotational degree of freedom, or provides both a pitch and a yaw rotational degree of freedom of the third intermediate rigid body with respect to the second intermediate rigid body. A virtual center of rotation is established, at least in part, by the first joint and by the second joint. The virtual center of rotation resides at a location that is occupied by the handle assembly, or that is occupied by a user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly, or that is occupied by both the handle assembly and by the user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly.
In an embodiment, an articulation input joint is established between the handle assembly and the frame assembly by way of the first intermediate rigid body, the second intermediate rigid body, and the third intermediate rigid body, and by way of the first joint and the second joint. The articulation input joint has the virtual center of rotation. A grounding joint is established between the handle assembly and the frame assembly by way of one or more of the first intermediate rigid body, the second intermediate body, and/or the third intermediate body. The grounding joint has a second virtual center. The virtual center of rotation of the articulation input joint and the second virtual center of the grounding joint exhibit a generally coincident arrangement with respect to each other.
In an embodiment, the second virtual center of the grounding joint resides at the location that is occupied by the handle assembly, or that is occupied by the user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly, or that is occupied by both the handle assembly and by the user's hand when the user is manipulating the handle assembly during use of the surgical tool assembly.
In an embodiment, the handle assembly establishes a first axis. A shaft of the frame assembly establishes a second axis. The first axis generally intersects the virtual center of rotation of the articulation input joint and generally intersects the second virtual center of the grounding joint. The second axis generally intersects the virtual center of rotation of the articulation input joint and generally intersects the second virtual center of the grounding joint.
In an embodiment, the handle assembly is translationally constrained along an x-axis with respect to the frame assembly by way of the grounding joint. The handle assembly is translationally constrained along a y-axis with respect to the frame assembly by way of the grounding joint. And the handle assembly is translationally constrained along a z-axis relative to the frame assembly by way of the grounding joint.
In an embodiment, the articulation input joint and the grounding joint exhibit a parallel arrangement with respect to each other between the handle assembly and the frame assembly.
In an embodiment, an articulation input joint is established between the handle assembly and the frame assembly by way of the first intermediate rigid body, the second intermediate rigid body, and the third intermediate rigid body, and by way of the first joint and the second joint. A pitch motion path of the articulation input joint and a yaw motion path of the articulation input joint exhibit a serial kinematic arrangement with respect to each other. A grounding joint is established between the handle assembly and the frame assembly by way of one or more of the first intermediate rigid body, the second intermediate body, and/or the third intermediate body. Rigid body motion transmission paths effected and furnished by way of the grounding joint exhibit a serial kinematic arrangement.
Various embodiments of a surgical tool assembly may include one or more or any technically-feasible combinations of any of the recitations and subject matter set forth in paragraphs of this summary section.
Embodiments of the disclosure are described with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
Multiple embodiments of surgical tools and assemblies are depicted in the figures and detailed in this description. Definitions of certain terms are presented prior to particular figure references in this description:
1.1 Body—Body is a discrete continuous component that can be used as structural components to form an assembly or sub-assembly. The displacement/motion state of a body can be completely defined with respect to a reference ground by six degrees of freedom (DoF). A body can be part of an assembly, where the assembly may include multiple bodies that are inter-connected by joints. Generally, a body may be rigid (i.e., with no compliance) or may be compliant. One or more discrete bodies may be connected together via a rigid joint. These bodies together are still termed as a body as there are no single or multi degree of freedom joints between these bodies. In certain scenarios, this body may be produced out of a single/monolithic structure and therefore, be only a single body. In certain scenarios, a body may be compliant (i.e., not rigid) but still discrete and continuous. In any case, the body may be monolithic or assembled using rigid joints. The body may be of homogenous material composition or heterogenous material composition.
1.2 Mechanism/Joint/Connector—In general, there may be a certain equivalence between the terms “mechanism” and “joint.” A “joint” may be alternatively referred to as a “connector” or a “constraint.” All of these can be viewed as allowing certain motion(s) along certain degree(s) of freedom between two bodies and constraining the remaining motions. A mechanism generally comprises multiple joints and bodies. Typically, a joint may be of simpler construction, while a mechanism may be more complex as it can comprise multiple joints. A joint refers to a mechanical connection that allows motions as opposed to a fixed joint (e.g., welded, bolted, screwed, or glued jointly). In the latter case, fixed joint, two bodies are fused with each other and are considered one and the same in the kinematic sense (because there is no relative motion allowed or there are no relative degrees of freedom between the two). The term “fixed joint” may be used herein to refer to this kind of joint between two bodies. When reference to the term “joint” is made, it means a connection that allows at least some motions or degrees of freedom, e.g., a pin joint, a pivot joint, a universal joint, a ball and socket joint, etc.
1.3 Degree of Freedom (DoF)—As noted, a joint or mechanism allow certain motions between two bodies and constrains the remaining motions. “Degrees of freedom” is a technical term to capture or convey these “motions.” In total, there are six independent motions and therefore degrees of freedom possible between two rigid bodies when there is no joint between them: three translations and three rotations. A joint will allow anywhere between zero and six DoFs between the two bodies. For the case when the joint allows zero DoFs, this effectively becomes a “fixed joint,” as described above, where the two bodies are rigidly fused or connected to each other. In this case, from a kinematic sense, the two bodies are one and the same. For the case when the joint allows six DoFs, this effectively means that the joint does not constrain any motions between the two bodies. In other words, the motions of the two bodies is entirely independent of each other. A joint for the purpose this application may allow one, or two, or three, or four, or five DoF between two rigid bodies. If it allows one DoF, then the remaining five possible motions are constrained by the joint. If it allows two DoF, then the remaining four possible motions are constrained by the joint, and so on.
1.4 Degree of Constraint (DoC)—“Degree of constraint” refers to directions along which relative motion is constrained between two bodies. Since relative motion is constrained, these are directions along which motion and loads (i.e., forces or moments) can be transmitted from one body to the other body. Since the joint does not allow relative motion between the two bodies in the DoC direction, if one body moves in the DoC direction, it drives along with it the other body along that direction. In other words, motions are transmitted from one rigid body to another in the DoC directions. Consequently, loads are also transmitted from one rigid body to another in the DoC directions, which are sometimes also referred to as the load bearing directions or simply bearing directions. The term “retention” may also be used in the context of a DoC direction. For example, one body may be constrained or equivalently retained with respect to a second body along a certain DoC. This means that relative motion is not allowed between the two bodies in the DoC direction, or equivalently the direction of constraint, or equivalently the direction of retention. Retention of all six DoFs means the same thing as having six DoCs between two bodies.
1.5 Local Ground—In the context of an assembly of bodies connected by joints (e.g., a multi-body system, a mechanism), one or more bodies may be referred to as the “reference” or “ground” or “local ground.” The body referred to as the local ground is not necessarily an absolute ground (i.e., attached or bolted to the actual ground). Rather, the body that is selected as a local ground simply serves as a mechanical reference with respect to which the motions of all other bodies are described or investigated.
1.6 Axis and Direction—Axis refers to a specific line in space. A body may rotate with respect to (w.r.t.) another body about a certain axis. Alternatively, a body may translate w.r.t. another body in a certain direction. A direction is not defined by a particular axis and is instead commonly defined by multiple parallel axes. Thus, x-axis is a specific axis defined in space, while X direction refers to the direction of the x-axis or any other axis that is parallel to the x-axis. Multiple different but parallel axes can have the same X direction. Direction only has an orientation and not a location in space. In at least some embodiments, and with particular reference to
1.7 Serial Kinematic Joint/Mechanism—The term “kinematics” may refer to the geometric study and description of motion of bodies relative to other bodies. A serial kinematic joint, or serial kinematic mechanism, consists of bodies connected via a serial chain of connectors, joints, or mechanisms. If one traces or scribbles a line from one body to another in a serial kinematic joint/mechanism, there exists only one mechanical path (or line) of motion transmission. In a somewhat simplistic example of a serial kinematic joint/mechanism, a first body and a second body are connected to each other via four connectors and three intermediate bodies. The first body and second body may be considered rigid, and the intermediate bodies may be considered rigid for practical purposes. The connectors may be simple or complex joints that may allow certain motions while constrain other motions. The connectors and intermediate bodies may span in what is effectively a single line and mechanical path between the first and second bodies.
1.8 Parallel Kinematic Joint/Mechanism—In a somewhat simplistic example of a parallel kinematic mechanism, the first body is connected to the second body via multiple independent chains and lines of intermediate bodies. Each such chain represents a mechanical path of motion transmission. If one traces possible lines from the first body to the second body, there is more than one mechanical path, which makes this a parallel design. The connection paths are not parallel in a geometric sense (e.g., two straight lines being parallel such as the opposing sides of a rectangle), but parallel in the kinematic sense, which implies multiple (more than one), independent, non-overlapping chains or paths between the first body and second body. The connectors here are simple or complex joints that may allow certain motions and constrain other motions. For convenience, the term joint and connector may be used interchangeably.
1.9 Virtual Center of Rotation—When provided in an embodiment, a virtual center of rotation, (also referred to as “virtual center”), refers to a center of rotation where two or more axis of rotation coincide or intersect. For example, two axes of rotation can intersect. An axis of rotation of a first rotational direction, such as a pitch axis, and an axis of rotation of a second rotational direction, such as a yaw axis, intersect at a virtual center of rotation. The virtual center may be located in a vacant space devoid of any other components of a parallel kinematic mechanism, for example.
1.10 User Interface—When provided in an embodiment, a user interface refers to the input interface that a user interacts with to provide input to a machine or instrument or mechanism with the objective of producing some change or outcome in the machine or instrument or mechanism. User interface is often an ergonomic feature on a body, which is part of an instrument, that is triggered or actuated by the user, e.g., a knob on a car dashboard can be rotated by a user to increase/decrease speakers' sound volume. Here, the knob and, specifically, the knurled outer circumference (feature) of the knob is the user interface.
1.11 Transmission Member—When provided in an embodiment, a transmission member is a rigid or compliant body that transmits motions from one body to another body. A transmission member may be a compliant wire, cable, cable assembly, flexible shaft, etc.
1.12 Handle Body—When provided in an embodiment, a handle body refers to a body in the handle assembly which is considered as a local ground while describing the handle assembly and associated mechanisms. When provided, the handle body is held by the user while other bodies within handle assembly may be put in motion with respect to the handle body via the user interface.
1.13 Handle Assembly—When provided in an embodiment, a handle Assembly is a term used for an assembly that, in some embodiments, at least consists of the handle body and user interface.
1.14 Tool Frame—When provided in an embodiment, the tool frame refers to a structural body that may be part of a tool apparatus or surgical tool. In certain tool apparatuses, it may be connected to handle assembly and/or an elongated tool shaft. Terms namely “tool frame” and “frame” may be used interchangeably throughout the document.
1.15 Tool Shaft—When provided in an embodiment, a tool shaft is generally a rigid extension of the frame, at its proximal end, which is a slender and elongated member, commonly a cylinder, that houses the end-effector assembly at its distal end. The tool shaft may simply be referred to as the shaft. The axis of the tool shaft may be referred to as axis 3 or Tool Shaft Roll Axis or Tool Shaft Axis throughout the description.
1.16 End-Effector Assembly—When provided in an embodiment, the end-effector (EE) assembly may be referred to as the EE assembly. In some embodiments, the EE assembly may exist at the distal end of the tool shaft. An EE assembly may contain one or more jaws (or EE jaws). There can be two types of EE assembly. The first type of EE assembly consists of two EE jaws, namely a moving jaw and a fixed jaw. There may also exist an EE frame that acts a local reference ground for the moving jaw and any other moving body within the EE assembly. In such an assembly, the moving jaw moves relative to the EE frame by rotating about a pivot pin. This motion of the moving jaw with respect to the EE frame is termed as jaw closure motion. The fixed jaw may also be coupled to EE Frame such that it is a rigid extension of the EE Frame. The EE frame may be further coupled to the shaft via an output articulation joint.
When an instrument incorporates an output articulation joint, the EE frame rotates about an Axis 2 while the tool shaft rotates about Axis 3. When there is no input at the articulation input joint, Axis 2 and Axis 3 are oriented parallel to the X-axis. In cases where there is an input at the articulation input joint, Axis 2 will be deviate from a parallel orientation to the x-axis by rotating varying amounts about the y-axis and z-axis. The EE assembly rotation about the y-axis may also be referred to as EE yaw, whereas rotation about the z-axis may be referred to as EE pitch.
1.17 Roll Transmission Member—When provided in an embodiment, this transmission member helps transmit rotation of rotation input or dial w.r.t. the handle body to produce EE roll motion.
1.18 Articulation Transmission Member—When provided in an embodiment, the articulation transmission member is a transmission member, or connector, that transmits articulation (pitch and yaw motion) from an articulation input joint to an articulation output joint.
1.19 Jaw Closure Transmission Assembly—When provided in an embodiment, a jaw closure transmission assembly refers to bodies, joints, mechanisms and/or jaw closure transmission member(s) that exist between the handle assembly and the EE assembly and facilitate jaw closure motion. In an example, the body within the handle assembly that produces output motion (e.g., a shuttle) is coupled to the proximal body that is part of the jaw closure transmission assembly. Similarly, the moving jaw within the EE assembly is coupled to the distal most body that is part of the jaw closure transmission assembly. Terms “jaw closure transmission assembly” and “jaw actuation transmission assembly” may be used interchangeably throughout the description.
1.20 EE Roll Transmission Assembly—When provided in an embodiment, the EE roll transmission assembly refers to bodies, joints, mechanisms and/or roll transmission member(s) that may exist between the handle assembly and the EE assembly and facilitate EE roll motion. In an example, body within the handle assembly that produces output motion (e.g., the shuttle) is coupled to the proximal body that is part of the roll transmission assembly. Similarly, components within the EE assembly (e.g., an EE frame) is coupled to the distal most body that is part of the roll transmission assembly.
2. Surgical Tool and Assembly, Functional Attributes, and User Experience
In general, a surgical tool 10 can be employed for use in minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures, and can be a handheld instrument. The surgical tool 10 may also be referred to as a tool apparatus; or, in the case of it being handheld, may be referred to as a handheld tool apparatus. The surgical tool 10 may have various designs, constructions, and components in different embodiments, which may be dictated in part or more on the intended application and ultimate use of the surgical tool 10.
The tool apparatus, or surgical tool 10, hence includes the handle assembly 12, the frame assembly 14, and the EE assembly 16 that are related via a plurality of joints and connectors. Collectively, the collection of bodies, joints, and connectors facilitate the translation of useful user input motions at the handle assembly 12 into useful motions of the EE Assembly 16 distally located with respect thereto. Intermediate to the handle assembly 12 and EE assembly 16 is located the frame assembly 14. The system facilitates the transmission of seven distinct motions from the handle assembly 12 to the EE assembly 16 via the frame assembly 14 (i.e., three translations, three rotations, and jaw open-close). Due to the independence of different motion transfer paths, the system is configured such that it provides a degree of device usability that is higher than past MIS devices. In at least some embodiments, the surgical tool 10 lacks electrical components among the handle assembly 12, frame assembly 14, and EE assembly 16, and can hence be considered a purely mechanical device and assembly.
The system is comprised of the three assemblies: the handle assembly 12 which receives the user inputs, the frame assembly 14 which includes the rigidly connected shaft 28, and the EE assembly 16. Between each assembly are a plurality of joints and intermediate bodies configured to receive and map motions between the bodies. The joints and intermediate bodies may simply be referred to collectively as a connection. One focus of this application relates to the configuration of connections that reside between the handle assembly 12 and the frame assembly 14 and their collective impact on EE assembly motions.
The connections between the handle and frame assemblies 12, 14 that are used for positioning and orientation of the shaft 28 and EE assembly 16 may constitute and make-up the articulation input joint 32 and may constitute and make-up a grounding joint 50 (sometimes referred to as an axial grounding joint (AGJ) 50). A purpose of the AIJ 32 is to translate two rotational degrees of freedom of the handle assembly 12 (pitch and yaw) to the EE Assembly 16. Additionally, the AIJ 32 may passively translate the third rotational degree of freedom, roll about the x-axis, from the handle assembly 12 to the EE assembly 16 as well. Further, it may be referenced that the roll motions are translated via the roll actuation joint 34. Although the roll actuation joint 34 may be independent in some device architectures, the roll motions may be generally translated and integral to the AIJ 32. In an embodiment, the pair of intermediate bodies that facilitate the transfer of motions and that are located between the frame assembly 14 and handle assembly 12 may be flex strips 52. Each flex strip 52 is connected to the handle and frame assemblies 12, 14 via a hinge joint. The flex strips 52 may be a flexible body, or mechanism, which provides one DoF between the oppositely spaced hinge joints.
A purpose of the AGJ 50 is to translate three translational rigid body DoFs (motions in x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis directions) from the handle assembly 12 to the EE assembly 16 via the frame assembly 14 and translate one rotational DoF (roll). In other words, the AGJ 50 constrains three rigid body DoFs (motions in x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis directions) between the handle assembly 12 and the frame assembly 14 with respect to each other, and constrains one rotational DoF (roll) between the handle assembly 12 and the frame assembly 14 with respect to each other. But the AGJ 50 does not constrain the pitch rotational DoF between the handle assembly 12 and the frame assembly 14 with respect to each other, and does not constrain the yaw rotational DoF between the handle assembly 12 and the frame assembly 14 with respect to each other.
Enhanced usability of the surgical tool 10, as compared to past MIS instruments and according to at least one embodiment, is facilitated by parallel configuration of the AIJ 32 and the AGJ 50.
To frame usability benefits, it may be assumed that the use case for the surgical tool 10 involves, at a minimum, a user (typically a surgeon) and a trocar (i.e., device that allows insertion of an instrument into a patient's body during a surgical operation; an access portal for the instrument; a grounded device providing two rigid body translational DoC to the instrument shaft; restricts tool shaft motion in y-direction and z-direction). The user grasps the handle body 18 while positioning the surgical tool 10 such that the shaft 28 of the frame assembly 14 extends through the trocar. The trocar provides an effective single point, simple support for the shaft 28 to constrain the motions. When viewing the location of the trocar simple support as local ground, the trocar does not provide any rotational constraint in any of the three rotational DoF for the shaft 28 (rotation about y-axis, rotation about z-axis, and roll about the shaft x-axis). The trocar also does not constrain translation motion along the shaft 28; thus, allowing sliding motion in x-direction. The limitations of motion for the surgical tool 10 may be dictated only by the inherent geometrical constraints of the system.
When grasping the handle assembly 12, the user controls the position and orientation of the EE assembly 16 through input motions of the handle assembly 12. When a user grasps the handle assembly 12 and provides a yaw motion input, a proportional yaw motion output of the EE assembly 16 will be produced. Likewise, pitch motion input at the handle assembly 12 translates to a pitch motion at the EE assembly 16. The yaw motion input and the pitch motion input are via the AIJ 32, per at least some embodiments. When the user moves the handle assembly 12 in the X-direction (parallel to the X-axis), the EE assembly 16 moves accordingly along the shaft axis 30 through the trocar and as if it were rigidly connected to the handle assembly 12. For handle assembly 12 motions in the direction of the positive Z-direction (+Z) or positive Y-direction (+Y), the EE assembly 16 translates inversely, and proportional, due to the DoC of the trocar pivot. In other words, handle assembly 12 motion in a direction parallel with the +Y will result in proportional motion of the EE assembly 16 in a negative Y-direction (−Y); this holds true for handle assembly 12 motions in the Z-direction. This may be referred to as the fulcrum effect. These movements in the X-, Y-, and Z-directions are via the AGJ 50, per at least some embodiments. The resultant input control system provided to the user allows the user to precisely and predictably control the position and orientation of the shaft 28.
As stated, each of the independent input motions at the handle assembly 12 described may be orchestrated without impact to other unintended motions of the EE assembly 16 relative to the shaft 28 local ground. The orientation of the EE assembly 16 is controlled through pitch and yaw input motions at the handle assembly 12 (change in rotational orientation of Axis 1). When the pitch and yaw orientation of the EE assembly 16 change, Axis 2 shifts and is no longer parallel with Axis 3. Yaw input motion at the handle assembly 12 will produce proportional yaw output motion of the EE assembly 16. The EE assembly 16 motion occurs without effect to shaft 28 position or orientation relative to the trocar nor does it impact the pitch orientation of the EE assembly 16. Likewise, pitch input at the handle assembly 12 will only produce EE assembly 16 pitch motion. The independence of each relationship allows for a user to precisely and predictably control the orientation of the EE assembly 16 relative to the shaft 28.
According to at least some embodiments, and with general reference now to
According to at least some embodiments, and still with general reference to
The handle assembly 12 is connected to the third intermediate body 78, or the deviation ring, that contains two sets of pin joints orthogonally oriented around its circumference: a third set of pin joints 80 and a fourth set of pin joints 82. The third set of pin joints 80 is a pitch DoF joint, while the fourth set of pin joints 82 is a yaw DoF joint. The pitch DoF joint 80 is connected to the handle assembly 12 or to unitary extension arms 84 of the handle assembly 12, while the yaw DoF joint 82 is connected to the frame assembly 14. The extension arms 84 can themselves be rigid bodies. In at least some embodiments, the extensions arms 84 can be a constituent part of the handle assembly 12 or can constitute intermediate bodies of the surgical tool 10. The architecture of the handle assembly 12, when connected to the deviation ring pitch DoF joint 80, positions the handle axis 24, at the center of the deviation ring 78. The deviation ring yaw DoF joint 82 at the frame assembly 14 may be split into an additional intermediate member and two joints that allow for a roll DoF (a bearing or rotationally sliding member); however, this is not necessary for function.
The center point defined by the deviation ring 78 is at an intersection of the two axes created by the pitch DoF joint 80 and the yaw DoF joint 82—namely, at the intersection of the pitch axis 74 and the yaw axis 76. The center of rotation may also be referred to as a virtual center 86 of the AGJ 50 (VC-AGJ), or a second virtual center 86. The VC-AGJ 86 is located at a point that also intersects the shaft axis 30. In other embodiments the VC-AGJ 86 may be located at point that does not intersect the shaft axis 30. It is helpful to view the VC-AGJ 86 as the point whereby the user controls the position of the proximal end of the frame 26. It is from that point that the user may raise or lower the surgical tool 10 (Y-direction motion), move the surgical tool 10 from side-to-side (Z-direction motion), and drive or retract the surgical tool 10 from the trocar along the shaft axis 30 (X-direction motion).
According to at least some embodiments, device usability is influenced by the relative locations of the VC-AIJ 72, VC-AGJ 86, the handle axis 24 (Axis 1), and the shaft axis 30 (Axis 3). Furthermore, usability is influenced by the positioning of the user interfaces that control the influential points. The handheld architecture, per at least some embodiments, incorporates co-location and intersection of these elements. The VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86 can exhibit a generally coincident arrangement relative to each other according to at least some embodiments. In this sense, the VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86 may simply be referred to as the virtual center. Stated another way, the VC-AIJ 72 and the VC-AGJ 86 may reside at the same and single virtual center. Further, the handle axis 24 and the shaft axis 30 can exhibit a generally intersecting arrangement with the VC-AIJ 72 and with the VC-AGJ 86, per at least some embodiments. That is, the handle axis 24 can intersect the VC-AIJ 72 and can intersect the VC-AGJ 86, and the shaft axis 30 can likewise intersect the VC-AIJ 72 and can intersect the VC-AGJ 86. As used herein, the phrases “generally coincident” and “generally intersect,” and their grammatical variations, are intended to account for certain engineering and manufacturing tolerances and slight imprecisions that may arise—and without deviation from the intended functionality and outcome—such that mathematical precision is not implied and, in some instances, is not possible.
Per at least some embodiments, the handle assembly 12 is the control point to effect articulation of the EE assembly 16 via the AIJ 32, the roll position of the frame assembly 14 and the EE assembly 16 via the AIJ 32, and the position of the EE assembly 16 via the virtual center (i.e., VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86) and the AGJ 50. In other words, all useful motions of the EE assembly 16 can be controlled through a single user interface element, or touch point—namely the handle assembly 12. When a user grips the handle assembly 12, the user gains control of all useful motions of the surgical tool 10 within the palm of the user's hand. This differs from certain past MIS instruments in which a grounding component is effected at a user's wrist via a wrist grounding component that is received over the user's wrist; the surgical tool 10 lacks such a wrist grounding component according to the embodiments of the figures.
Furthermore, it may not only be that the user can control all useful EE motions through position and orientation of the handle assembly 12, but device usability may be influenced by relative position of the handle assembly 12 along the handle axis 24 relative to the virtual center (i.e., VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86). With reference to
In at least some embodiments, the handle assembly 12 does not necessarily need to be embodied as illustrated in the figures and including two sub-assemblies, namely the handle body 18 and dial 22. The handle assembly 12 may simply be a single body without discrete distinctions between its regions. In such an embodiment, the surgical tool 10 would not facilitate roll functionality within the device. The user, however, may provide a roll input by pronation or supination of their hand, and by extension of their wrist and forearm. Their pronation or supination input motions will result in roll about the shaft axis 30.
The handle assembly 12 may be configured that the proximal and distal regions 88, 90 are two separate bodies which incorporate a relative roll DoF therebetween. With this configuration, and the bodies maintain a consistent handle axis 24 while providing roll DoF between the two bodies. The distal body in the handle assembly 12 may be called the dial 22. The dial 22 is intended to be controlled by a user that grips the dial 22 and rotationally positions it relative to the proximal handle body 18. When a device is configured with a handle assembly 12 containing the dial 22, the components within the device that are impacted by roll are depicted in
With the virtual center (i.e., VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86) located in the central region 92 of the handle assembly 12, the proximal and distal regions 88, 90 of the handle assembly 12 may consequently inherit unique characteristics per at least some embodiments. For example, when the handle assembly 12 rotates about the pitch axis 74, a portion of the handle assembly 12 moves in a positive +Z-direction and the opposite portion of the handle assembly 12 moves inversely in a negative −Z-direction. Similarly, when the handle assembly 12 rotates about the yaw axis 76, a portion of the handle assembly 12 moves in a positive +Y-direction and the opposite portion of the handle assembly 12 moves in a −Y direction. When there is a pitch input to the handle assembly 12, yaw input to the handle assembly 12, or any combination thereof, there is no impact to the location of the virtual center and, in turn, no impact to the position or orientation of the frame assembly 14 relative to the trocar. Conversely, with rigid body motions of the handle assembly 12 in X-, Y-, and Z-directions the motions directly impact frame position at the virtual center. Due to the parallel kinematic structures, the rigid body motion inputs to the handle assembly 12 have no impact to the pitch and yaw orientation of the handle assembly 12 nor the EE assembly 16. When the EE assembly 16 is not articulated, it can be seen that the EE axis 48 is co-linear with the shaft axis 30 and handle axis 24.
Moreover, in at least some embodiments, the VC-AIJ 72 resides at a location that is occupied by the handle assembly 12, such as at a location occupied by the handle body 18 or at a location occupied by the dial 22. The VC-AIJ 72 can further reside at a location that is occupied by a user's hand 94 (
Additionally, in at least some embodiments, the configuration of the surgical tool 10 allows for a functional performance characteristic called an articulated roll. The articulated roll takes place when the handle assembly 12 is first rotated to position that may be any combination of pitch/yaw angle and the handle assembly 12 is maintained in that orientation relative to the trocar relative ground. Then, the user provides a roll input to the distal region 90 of the handle assembly 12 (e.g., the dial 22). The result is that the orientation of the handle assembly 12 may remain stationary while the frame 26 rolls, or spins along the shaft axis 30. Combining the articulated roll input with functionality provided by a connected AIJ 32, the user may replicate the articulated roll at the EE assembly 16.
The location of the virtual center (i.e., VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86) may also have an interesting impact on user experience during articulation motions. When the user provides a positive pitch input to the handle assembly 12, the distal region 90 of the handle assembly 12 moves in a positive +Y-direction. This correlates directly with the desired effect to the EE assembly 16 distally mounted to the frame 26 and shaft 28 subassembly when connected via pulleys and cables. In other words, the fine motor movement of the user's thumb and forefinger while gripping the distal region 90 of the handle assembly 12 are intuitively mapped to end-effector assembly motion. This occurs even despite the negative Y displacement of the proximal region 88 of the handle assembly 12 where a great proportion of the user input forces are located. The intuitive relationship exists for handle assembly 12 yaw motions as well.
In a parallel-kinematic (PK) mechanism, for pitch inputs, the handle assembly 12 rotates about the virtual center (i.e., VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86). For clockwise pitch inputs (relative to orientation of
3. Surgical Tool and Assembly Architectures I-V
According to at least some embodiments, the surgical tool 10 may be an assembly of various sub-assemblies, namely, the handle assembly 12, the frame 26, the shaft 28, and the EE assembly 16. There may also exist various joints/mechanisms and transmission assemblies within and/or between the sub-assemblies to facilitate certain functionality of the surgical tool 10. The surgical tool 10 may provide various functions which correspond to following output motions: i) articulation motion (i.e., pitch and yaw rotation) of the EE assembly 16; ii) rigid body motion of the shaft 28 and the EE assembly 16; iii) articulated roll motion of the EE assembly 16 (or portion thereof); and iv) jaw closure motion at the EE assembly 16.
Although the surgical tool 10 may be configured with the jaw closure motion function (iv), the function is facilitated via a series of interconnected transmission members mounted between the bodies mentioned above. This embodiment (
Of the four functions identified, the two primary functions per certain embodiments are articulation motion of the EE assembly 16 and rigid body motion of the shaft 28 and of the EE assembly 16. The articulation function and rigid body motion, and particularly the rigid body motion along the shaft axis 30, are described by way of surgical tool constraint maps.
Surgical tool architecture I refers to an apparatus which utilizes a parallel-kinematic (PK) joint as the AIJ 32. The PK AIJ 32 provides independent pitch and yaw motion paths to transmit motion from the handle assembly 12 to the EE assembly 16. The PK AIJ 32 is also a virtual center (VC1) joint, meaning it establishes the VC-AIJ 72. The AGJ 50 for architecture I is a serial-kinematic (SK), virtual center (VC2) joint. The VC-AGJ 86 is established in this architecture. The VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86 generally intersect and coincide, as previously described, to form a common virtual center of rotation. In case the VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86 do not intersect and coincide, the kinematics may get compromised and this may lead to binding/freezing of motion due to a lack of a single virtual center of rotation. Architecture I is shown in the schematic diagram of
Surgical tool architecture II utilizes an AIJ 32 that is a serial-kinematic (SK), non-virtual center (VC) joint. In a non-VC joint, the pitch axis of rotation 74 and the yaw axis of rotation 76 do not intersect with each other. The AGJ 50 in the case of architecture II is a SK, VC joint. The VC-AGJ 86 is established in this architecture. Architecture II is shown in the schematic diagram of
Surgical tool architecture III utilizes an AIJ 32 that is a parallel-kinematic (PK), virtual center (VC1) joint. The VC-AIJ 72 is established in this architecture. The AGJ 50 in the case of architecture III is a parallel-kinematic (PK), virtual center (VC2) joint which also provides translation DoC along shaft axis 30 apart from allowing pitch and yaw DoF motions. The VC-AGJ 86 is established in this architecture. The VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86 generally intersect and coincide, as previously described, to form a common virtual center of rotation. In case the VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86 do not intersect and coincide, the kinematics may get compromised and this may lead to binding/freezing of motion due to a lack of a single virtual center of rotation. Architecture III is shown in the schematic diagram of
Surgical tool architecture IV utilizes an AIJ 32 that is a serial-kinematic (SK), non-virtual (VC) joint. In a non-VC joint, the pitch axis of rotation 74 and the yaw axis of rotation 76 do not intersect with each other. The AGJ 50 in the case of architecture IV is a parallel-kinematic (PK), VC joint which also provides translation DoC along shaft axis 30 apart from allowing pitch and yaw DoF motions. The VC-AGJ 86 is established in this architecture. Architecture IV is shown in the schematic diagram of
Surgical tool architecture V utilizes an AIJ 32 that is a serial-kinematic (SK), virtual center (VC1) joint. The VC-AIJ 72 is established in this architecture. The AGJ 50 in the case of architecture V is a serial-kinematic (SK), virtual center (VC2) joint which also provides translation DoC along the shaft axis 30 apart from allowing pitch and yaw DoF motions. The VC-AGJ 86 is established in this architecture. The VC-AIJ 72 and VC-AGJ 86 generally intersect and coincide, as previously described, to form a common virtual center of rotation. Architecture V is shown in the schematic diagram of
3.1 Architecture I
The embodiments of
The handle assembly 12, specifically the dial 22 in this embodiment, is connected to the frame 26 via the first pulley 64 which is considered an intermediate body 54 in at least some embodiments, and is connected to the frame 26 via the second pulley 66 which is also considered an intermediate body 54 in at least some embodiments. Rotation of the first pulley 64 about the first pulley axis 68 captures one motion, whereas rotation of the second pulley 66 about the second pulley axis 70 captures another motion. Given the orthogonality between the first and second pulley axes 68, 70, these two motions are mutually exclusive and therefore, account for two DoF motions of the EE assembly 16. The first intermediate body 56, or first connector, that links the dial 22 to the first pulley 64 transmits handle assembly 12 motion when it rotates about the first pulley axis 68, and conversely does not transmit handle assembly 12 motion when it rotates solely about the second pulley axis 70. The same holds true for the second intermediate body 58, or second connector, that links the dial 22 to the second pulley 66. In the embodiments of
As set forth above, in architecture I, the SK AGJ 50 is provided and the VC-AGJ 86 is established. In
In architecture I, and as previously described, the VC-AIJ 72 resides at a location that is occupied by the handle assembly 12, can reside at a location that is occupied by a user's hand 94 when the user is grasping the handle assembly 12 in order to manipulate the handle assembly 12, or can reside at both locations when those locations are one and the same. In a similar way, the VC-AGJ 86 resides at a location that is occupied by the handle assembly 12, can reside at a location that is occupied by a user's hand 94 when the user is grasping the handle assembly 12 in order to manipulate the handle assembly 12, or can reside at both locations when those locations are one and the same.
Furthermore, the embodiments of
3.2 Architecture II
The embodiment of
3.3 Architecture III
The embodiment of
3.4 Architecture IV
The embodiment of
Other Types of Transmission Members
Furthermore, for embodiments of the surgical tool 10 that employ the flex strips 52 as an intermediate body—for example, the embodiments of architecture I—the flex strips 52 could take a different form and could be replaced by other types of transmission members. When employed in embodiments of the first architecture I, an additional rotational DoF may be furnished between the flex strips 52 (and transmission members) and the handle assembly 12 about the handle axis 24 in order to preclude an unwanted binding condition that might otherwise arise. In
3.5 Architecture V
The embodiments of
A first intermediate body 130 extends from the handle assembly 12, and particularly from the dial 22. The first intermediate body 130 is a rigid body. End-to-end over its full extent, the first intermediate body 130 has an arcuate profile and a half-ring shape. The first intermediate body 130 is rigidly fixed to the handle assembly 12, and can be a unitary extension thereof and a unitary extension of the dial 22. Indeed, the first intermediate body 130 can be a constituent part of the handle assembly 12, and hence could be considered a part of the handle assembly 12. In this embodiment, there is no relative movement between the first intermediate body 130 and the dial 22 amid use of the surgical tool 10. A second intermediate body 132 extends from the frame assembly 14, and particularly from the shaft 28 or from a shaft mount 134. The second intermediate body 132 is a rigid body. End-to-end over its full extent, the second intermediate body 132 has an arcuate profile and a half-ring shape. The second intermediate body 132 is rigidly fixed to the frame assembly 14, and can be a unitary extension thereof and a unitary extension of the shaft 28 or shaft mount 134. Indeed, the second intermediate body 132 can be a constituent part of the frame assembly 14, and hence could be considered a part of the frame assembly 14. In this embodiment, there is no relative movement between the second intermediate body 132 and the shaft 28 amid use of the surgical tool 10.
The third intermediate body 78, or deviation ring, is joined to the first intermediate body 130 via a first joint or the fourth set of pin joints 82, and is joined to the second intermediate body 132 via a second joint or the third set of pin joints 80. Over its full extent, the third intermediate body 78 has a full-ring shape. The third intermediate body 78 is a rigid body. The fourth set of pin joints 82 provides a yaw DoF joint between the first intermediate body 130 and the third intermediate body 78. The third set of pin joints 80 provides a pitch DoF joint between the second intermediate body 132 and the third intermediate body 78. The fourth set of pin joints 82 constitutes the sole connection and joint between the first intermediate body 130 and the third intermediate body 78, and, likewise, the third set of pin joints 80 constitutes the sole connection and joint between the second intermediate body 132 and the third intermediate body 78. The fourth set of pin joints 82 includes a pair of individual pin joints 82 distanced one-hundred-and-eighty degrees (180°) apart from each other over the circumference of the third intermediate body 78. Similarly, the third set of pin joints 80 includes a pair of individual pin joints 80 distanced one-hundred-and-eighty degrees (180°) apart from each other over the circumference of the third intermediate body 78. Relative to one another, individual pin joints 80, 82 are orthogonally arranged, and distanced ninety degrees (90°) apart over the circumference of the third intermediate body 78.
At one of the pair of individual pin joints 82, the second pulley 66 is situated and captures yaw rotation of the first intermediate body 130 with respect to the third intermediate body 78 about the second pulley axis 70 and about the yaw axis 76. As previously described, the captured yaw rotation is transmitted to the EE assembly 16 via the articulation transmission member which may be in the form of a wire or cable of the second pulley 66 that is routed to the EE assembly 16. At one of the pair of individual pin joints 80, the first pulley 64 is situated and captures pitch rotation of the second intermediate body 132 with respect to the third intermediate body 78 about the first pulley axis 68 and about the pitch axis 74. As previously described, the captured pitch rotation is transmitted to the EE assembly 16 via the articulation transmission member which may be in the form of a wire or cable of the first pulley 64 that is routed to the EE assembly 16.
In yet another embodiment of the fifth architecture V similar to the embodiment presented particularly by
With particular reference now to
When a feature or element is herein referred to as being “on” another feature or element, it can be directly on the other feature or element or intervening features and/or elements may also be present. In contrast, when a feature or element is referred to as being “directly on” another feature or element, there are no intervening features or elements present. It will also be understood that, when a feature or element is referred to as being “connected”, “attached” or “coupled” to another feature or element, it can be directly connected, attached or coupled to the other feature or element or intervening features or elements may be present. In contrast, when a feature or element is referred to as being “directly connected”, “directly attached” or “directly coupled” to another feature or element, there are no intervening features or elements present. Although described or shown with respect to one embodiment, the features and elements so described or shown can apply to other embodiments. It will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art that references to a structure or feature that is disposed “adjacent” another feature may have portions that overlap or underlie the adjacent feature.
Terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. For example, as used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items and may be abbreviated as “/”.
Spatially relative terms, such as “under”, “below”, “lower”, “over”, “upper” and the like, may be used herein for ease of description to describe one element or feature's relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures. For example, if a device in the figures is inverted, elements described as “under” or “beneath” other elements or features would then be oriented “over” the other elements or features. Thus, the exemplary term “under” can encompass both an orientation of over and under. The device may be otherwise oriented (rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein interpreted accordingly. Similarly, the terms “upwardly”, “downwardly”, “vertical”, “horizontal” and the like are used herein for the purpose of explanation only unless specifically indicated otherwise.
Although the terms “first” and “second” may be used herein to describe various features/elements (including steps), these features/elements should not be limited by these terms, unless the context indicates otherwise. These terms may be used to distinguish one feature/element from another feature/element. Thus, a first feature/element discussed below could be termed a second feature/element, and similarly, a second feature/element discussed below could be termed a first feature/element without departing from the teachings of the invention.
Throughout this specification and the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise”, and variations such as “comprises” and “comprising” means various components can be co-jointly employed in the methods and articles (e.g., compositions and apparatuses including device and methods). For example, the term “comprising” will be understood to imply the inclusion of any stated elements or steps but not the exclusion of any other elements or steps.
In general, any of the apparatuses and methods described herein should be understood to be inclusive, but all or a sub-set of the components and/or steps may alternatively be exclusive and may be expressed as “consisting of” or alternatively “consisting essentially of” the various components, steps, sub-components or sub-steps.
Although various illustrative embodiments are described above, any of several changes may be made to various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as described by the claims. For example, the order in which various described method steps are performed may often be changed in alternative embodiments, and in other alternative embodiments one or more method steps may be skipped altogether. Optional features of various device and system embodiments may be included in some embodiments and not in others. Therefore, the foregoing description is provided primarily for exemplary purposes and should not be interpreted to limit the scope of the invention as it is set forth in the claims.
The examples and illustrations included herein show, by way of illustration and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. As mentioned, other embodiments may be utilized and derived therefrom, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein individually or collectively by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept, if more than one is, in fact, disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. It is understood that the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention. The words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is under stood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The examples and illustrations included herein show, by way of illustration and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. These embodiments consist of bodies that have various types of joints and/or mechanisms namely, prismatic, revolute, cylindrical, etc. between them. These joints and/or mechanisms may consist of discrete elements/bodies/component or these joint/mechanisms may be created by compliant extensions of other bodies and/or assembles.
It is to be understood that the foregoing description is not a definition of the invention, but is a description of one or more preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention. The invention is not limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed herein, but rather is defined solely by the claims below. Furthermore, the statements contained in the foregoing description relate to particular embodiments and are not to be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention or on the definition of terms used in the claims, except where a term or phrase is expressly defined above. Various other embodiments and various changes and modifications to the disclosed embodiment(s) will become apparent to those skilled in the art. All such other embodiments, changes, and modifications are intended to come within the scope of the appended claims.
As used in this specification and claims, the terms “for example,” “for instance,” and “such as,” and the verbs “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and their other verb forms, when used in conjunction with a listing of one or more components or other items, are each to be construed as open-ended, meaning that that the listing is not to be considered as excluding other, additional components or items. Other terms are to be construed using their broadest reasonable meaning unless they are used in a context that requires a different interpretation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
331598 | White | Dec 1885 | A |
3028126 | Holleman | Apr 1962 | A |
3350956 | Monge | Nov 1967 | A |
3497083 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
4328839 | Lyons et al. | May 1982 | A |
4466649 | Ozawa | Aug 1984 | A |
4491325 | Bersheim | Jan 1985 | A |
4568311 | Miyake | Feb 1986 | A |
4712545 | Honkanen | Dec 1987 | A |
4740126 | Richter | Apr 1988 | A |
4750475 | Yoshihashi | Jun 1988 | A |
4754909 | Barker et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4950273 | Briggs | Aug 1990 | A |
5021969 | Okamura et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5069596 | Mueller et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5147357 | Rose et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5209747 | Knoepfler | May 1993 | A |
5297443 | Wentz | Mar 1994 | A |
5317952 | Immega | Jun 1994 | A |
5323570 | Kuhlman et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5330502 | Hassler et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5350391 | Iacovelli | Sep 1994 | A |
5368600 | Failla et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374277 | Hassler | Dec 1994 | A |
5379663 | Hara | Jan 1995 | A |
5379758 | Snyder | Jan 1995 | A |
5454827 | Aust et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456695 | Herve Dallemagne | Oct 1995 | A |
5549637 | Crainich | Aug 1996 | A |
5599151 | Daum et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5620415 | Lucey et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626608 | Cuny et al. | May 1997 | A |
5683412 | Scarfone | Nov 1997 | A |
5713505 | Huitema | Feb 1998 | A |
5716352 | Viola et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5735874 | Measamer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5782748 | Palmer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807376 | Viola et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810880 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813813 | Daum et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816770 | Itagaki | Oct 1998 | A |
5817084 | Jensen | Oct 1998 | A |
5820009 | Melling et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5853412 | Mayenberger | Dec 1998 | A |
5860995 | Berkelaar | Jan 1999 | A |
5908436 | Cuschieri et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6042555 | Kramer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6088020 | Mor | Jul 2000 | A |
6104379 | Petrich et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6270453 | Sakai | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309403 | Minor et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312435 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330837 | Charles et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6413229 | Kramer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6607475 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6707447 | Goranowski | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714839 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6746443 | Morley et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6853879 | Sunaoshi | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858005 | Ohline et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6889116 | Jinno | May 2005 | B2 |
6994716 | Jinno et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7101363 | Nishizawa et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7147650 | Lee | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7338513 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7410338 | Schiele et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7470268 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7553275 | Padget et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7608083 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7708756 | Nobis et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7736254 | Schena | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7862554 | Hegeman et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7866527 | Hall et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7947035 | Miyamoto et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7963913 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8029531 | Lee et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057487 | Chu et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8105319 | Doyle et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105350 | Lee et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8365633 | Simaan et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8398587 | Dewaele et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8425408 | Boulais et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8465475 | Isbell, Jr. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8528440 | Morley et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8540748 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8551076 | Duval et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8603135 | Mueller | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8668702 | Awtar et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8672206 | Aranyi et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8734312 | Conner et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8764448 | Yang et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777898 | Suon et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8821512 | Barrier et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8828046 | Stefanchik et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8870867 | Walberg et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8881616 | Dize et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8968355 | Malkowski et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8992422 | Spivey et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9050121 | Doyle | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060796 | Seo | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9084621 | Weitzner et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9161771 | Steger | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9220398 | Woodley et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9522014 | Nishizawa et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9532839 | Seo | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9575504 | Dize et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9579013 | Dewaele et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9622729 | Dewaele et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629682 | Wallace et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629689 | Bowles et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649096 | Sholev | May 2017 | B2 |
9675370 | Awtar et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9695916 | Lee | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9696700 | Beira et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9770300 | Kwon et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9814451 | Sharma et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9869339 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9889874 | Clause | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9901412 | Lathrop et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9955988 | Stefanchik et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10005181 | Hasegawa et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10085624 | Isoda et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10198086 | Parazynski et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10265129 | Beira | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10271913 | Yoshii et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10325072 | Beira et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10363055 | Beira et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10405936 | Awtar et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10426471 | Shelton, IV et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10449010 | Dewaele et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10617413 | Shelton, IV et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10660719 | De Mathelin et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10660721 | Bonny et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10664002 | Parazynski et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10695141 | Lee | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10709467 | Lee et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10722315 | Lee et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10758230 | Shelton, IV et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
11241247 | Yuan et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11344381 | Lee et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11490980 | Lee et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11510746 | Lee et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11523840 | Yuan et al. | Dec 2022 | B2 |
20010031983 | Brock et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030036748 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030083673 | Tierney et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030135203 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135204 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153902 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030176880 | Long et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176948 | Green | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040023616 | Straub et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049205 | Lee et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040138700 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236316 | Danitz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040253079 | Sanchez | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004431 | Kogasaka et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038469 | Lang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050090811 | Doyle et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107667 | Danitz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060074415 | Scott et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060111210 | Hinman | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111616 | Danitz | May 2006 | A1 |
20060156848 | Gosselin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060199999 | Ikeda et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060259073 | Miyamoto et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282063 | Gotani | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021738 | Hasser et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070072466 | Miyamoto et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078565 | Ghodoussi et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093790 | Downey et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080004493 | Schiemann | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039256 | Jinno et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065098 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080177285 | Brock et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080193260 | Yokokohji et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080243176 | Weitzner et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090118044 | Kuo et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171147 | Lee et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192511 | Haffenreffer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100004606 | Hansen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016853 | Burbank | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030018 | Fortier et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100056863 | Dejima et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100111645 | Al-Mouhamed et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100234831 | Hinman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249497 | Peine et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110024145 | Click et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110106145 | Jeong | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118707 | Burbank | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152881 | Conner et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152922 | Jeong | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178531 | Caputo et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110319911 | Conner et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120083799 | Chen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095298 | Stefanchik et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120118097 | Ilch | May 2012 | A1 |
20120186383 | Schvalb et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120271283 | Doyle | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277762 | Lathrop et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289973 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130012958 | Marczyk et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023868 | Worrell et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023974 | Amrani | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130066334 | Schoepp | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130172860 | Szewczyk et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130224710 | Yang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239734 | Hinman | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140135805 | Windgassen et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142595 | Awtar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140246471 | Jaworek et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140331798 | Shim et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140371532 | Trovato | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150021068 | Bernhardt et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150053455 | Hagi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150164601 | Sholev | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150230697 | Phee et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160135830 | Volkmer et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160256232 | Awtar et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160291383 | Han et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160303734 | Bowles et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170020614 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170095236 | Sharma | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170095922 | Licht et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170245954 | Beira | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170360522 | Beira | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180000318 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2018 | A9 |
20180049842 | Bowles et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180125519 | Beira et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180125592 | Beira | May 2018 | A1 |
20180221045 | Zimmerman et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180289384 | Bowles et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180368839 | Shelton, IV et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190133698 | Beira et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190336230 | Awtar et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200121406 | Lee | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200146766 | Lee | May 2020 | A1 |
20200222137 | Lee et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200229835 | Lee et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200237466 | Lee et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200289141 | Yuan et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210045825 | Lee et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210145470 | Holsten | May 2021 | A1 |
20210282797 | Bhowmick et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210386428 | Larsen et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220079611 | Lee et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220175441 | Weber et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220273381 | Lee et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20230034145 | Awtar et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230040475 | Weber et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
111789662 | Oct 2020 | CN |
113925569 | Jan 2022 | CN |
3232951 | Oct 2017 | EP |
3232952 | Oct 2017 | EP |
3232973 | Oct 2017 | EP |
3232974 | Oct 2017 | EP |
3232977 | Oct 2017 | EP |
3340897 | Jul 2018 | EP |
3566664 | Mar 2022 | EP |
937587 | Sep 1963 | GB |
973587 | Oct 1964 | GB |
2513326 | Oct 2014 | GB |
2552540 | Jan 2018 | GB |
2552541 | Jan 2018 | GB |
H0884702 | Apr 1996 | JP |
H0996146 | Apr 1997 | JP |
2002102248 | Apr 2002 | JP |
3292879 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003061969 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2007130485 | May 2007 | JP |
2009127289 | Jun 2009 | JP |
6220085 | Oct 2017 | JP |
WO2006036067 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2007137304 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007146894 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008020964 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2013027203 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO2014033717 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO2015125140 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO2016063213 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO2016161449 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO2020141702 | Jul 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jelinek et al., “Classification of Joints Used in Steerable Instruments for Minimally Invasive Surgery—A Review of the State of the Art”, Mar. 2015, pp. 1-11, Journal of Medical devices, vol. 9. (12 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US21/35469 dated Nov. 18, 2021 (29 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/050843 dated Dec. 28, 2021 (11 pages). |
Ikuta et al.; Shape Memory Alloy Servo Actuator System With Electric Resistance Feedback and Application for Active Endoscope (conf. paper); 1988 IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation; pp. 427-430; Apr. 24-29, 1988. |
Clement et al.; Design of a Snake-Like Manipulator; Robotics and Autonomous Systems; 6(3); pp. 265-282; Jul. 1990. |
Jug et al.; The JPL Sepentine Robot: a 12 DOF System for Inspection (Conference Paper); Proceedings—IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 3: 5 pgs.; Jun. 1995. |
Walker et al.; Novel ‘Elephant's Trunk’ Robot; IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, AIM; Piscataway, NJ, United States; pp. 410-415; Sep. 19-23, 1999. |
Peirs et al.; A flexible distal tip with two degrees of freedom for enhanced dexterity in endoscopic robot surgery; MME'02; The 13th Micromechanics Europe Workshop; Sinaia, Romania; pp. 271-274; Oct. 6-8, 2002. |
Simaan et al.; A dexterous system for laryngeal surgery; Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; New Orleans, LA.; pp. 351-357; Apr. 2004. |
Awtar et al.; A minimally invasive surgical tool with enhanced dexterity and intuitive actuation; J. Med. Devices; 4(3); 8 pages; (Author's Draft; 12 pages); Sep. 10, 2010. |
Do et al.; Adaptive control of position compensation for cable-conduit mechanisms used in flexible surgical robots; Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO-2014); IEEE; pp. 110-117; Sep. 1, 2014. |
Licht et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,489 entitled “Medical devices having smoothly articulating multi-cluster joints,” filed Oct. 5, 2016. |
Zimmerman et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/286,547 entitled “End-effector jaw closure transmission system for remote access tools,” filed Oct. 5, 2016. |
Wikipedia; Constant Velocity Joint; 6 pgs.; retrieved from the Internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant-velocity_joint) on Dec. 22, 2016. |
Awtar; U.S. Appl. No. 15/564,112 entitled “Tension management apparatus for cable-driven transmission,” filed Oct. 3, 2017. |
Zimmerman et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/946,612 entitled “End-effector jaw closure transmission systems for remote access tools,” filed Apr. 5, 2018. |
Wikipedia; Six-bar linkage; 2 pages; retrieved from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Six-bar_linkage&oldid=670945266) on Apr. 26, 2019. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2021/035469 dated Dec. 6, 2022 (8 pages). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2023/035182 dated Jan. 23, 2024 (2 pages). |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/035182 dated Jan. 23, 2024 (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210369390 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63033499 | Jun 2020 | US |