This application contains subject matter which is related to the subject matter of the following application, which is assigned to the same assignee as this application and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety:
The present invention relates generally to the field of surgery and medical implants, and more particularly, to surgical tools and methods for positioning an intervertebral device between vertebral members of a patient.
The human spine is a biomechanical structure with thirty-three vertebral members, and is responsible for protecting the spinal cord, nerve roots and internal organs of the thorax and abdomen. The spine also provides structure support for the body while permitting flexibility of motion. A significant portion of the population will experience back pain at some point in their lives resulting from a spinal condition. The pain may range from general discomfort to disabling pain that immobilizes the individual. Back pain may result from a trauma to the spine, be caused by the natural aging process, or may be the result of a degenerative disease or condition.
Procedures to remedy back problems sometimes require correcting the distance between vertebral members by inserting an intervertebral device (e.g., spacer) between the members. The spacer, which is carefully positioned within the disc space and aligned relative to the vertebral members, is sized to position the vertebral members in a manner to alleviate the patient's back pain.
Further, the intervertebral device is preferably designed to facilitate insertion into a patient. That is, the shape and size of the device are designed to provide for minimal intrusion to a patient during insertion, but still be effective post-insertion to alleviate the pain and provide maximum mobility to the patient.
The present invention comprises an insertion tool and method for facilitating positioning an intervertebral device (e.g., spacer) within the body. The tools and methods disclosed herein employ a tool-to-device attachment approach that is of sufficient strength for the insertion tool to be readily utilized to accurately insert and place the device. Further, the attachment approach provides for detachment and removal of the insertion tool while the intervertebral device remains within the body, and does not deter from the functionality of the device once within the body.
More particularly, in one aspect, presented herein is a surgical tool for positioning an intervertebral device between vertebral members of a patient. The surgical tool includes an elongate shaft and an anti-rotation sleeve. The elongate shaft has proximal and distal ends which define a longitudinal axis extending therebetween. The distal end of the elongate shaft includes an engagement member adapted to releasably engage the intervertebral device. The anti-rotation sleeve, which includes proximal and distal ends, is movably mounted to the elongate shaft and reciprocates relative thereto between a retracted position and an extended position. The distal end of the anti-rotation sleeve includes an anti-rotation member. The surgical tool further includes an actuation mechanism for controlling positioning and reciprocation of the anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft between the retracted position and the extended position. When the intervertebral device is releasably engaged by the engagement member at the distal end of the elongate shaft and the anti-rotation sleeve is in the extended position, the anti-rotation member at the distal end of the anti-rotation sleeve engages the intervertebral device and prevents rotation of the intervertebral device when releasing the engagement member from engagement with the intervertebral device.
In another aspect, the surgical tool presented herein includes an elongate shaft, an impaction cap, and an elongate anti-rotation sleeve. The elongate shaft has proximal and distal ends which define a first longitudinal axis extending therebetween. The distal end of the elongate shaft includes a threaded engagement member adapted to releasably engage the intervertebral device. The impaction cap is physically connected to the proximal end of the elongate shaft so that impacting force applied to the impaction cap is transferred to the elongate shaft, and hence to the threaded engagement member at the distal end thereof. The elongate anti-rotation sleeve includes proximal and distal ends which define a second longitudinal axis extending therebetween. The second longitudinal axis of the elongate anti-rotation sleeve is coaxial with the first longitudinal axis of the elongate shaft. The elongate anti-rotation sleeve is movably mounted to the elongate shaft and reciprocates relative thereto between a retracted position and an extended position. The distal end of the elongate anti-rotation sleeve includes an anti-rotation member. The surgical tool further includes an actuation mechanism for controlling positioning and reciprocation of the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft between the retracted position and the extended position, and for locking the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft. When the intervertebral device is releasably engaged by the threaded engagement member at the distal end of the elongate shaft, and the elongate anti-rotation sleeve is in the extended position, the anti-rotation member at the distal end of the elongate anti-rotation sleeve engages the intervertebral device and prevents rotation of the intervertebral device when releasing the threaded engagement member from engagement with the intervertebral device.
In a further aspect, a method of positioning an intervertebral device between vertebral members of a patient is provided. The method includes employing a surgical tool having: an elongate shaft with proximal and distal ends defining a longitudinal axis extending therebetween, the distal end of the elongate shaft comprising an engagement member adapted to releasably engage the intervertebral device; an elongate anti-rotation sleeve having proximal and distal ends, the elongate anti-rotation sleeve being movably mounted to the elongate shaft and reciprocating relative thereto between a retracted position and an extended position, the distal end of the elongate anti-rotation sleeve comprising an anti-rotation member; and an actuation mechanism for controlling positioning and reciprocation of the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft between the retracted and extended positions, and for locking the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft. The employing of the surgical tool comprises: employing the engagement member at the distal end of the elongate shaft of the surgical tool to releasably engage the intervertebral device; employing the actuation mechanism of the surgical tool to position the elongate anti-rotation sleeve in the extended position to engage the intervertebral device, and to lock the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft; inserting the intervertebral device between the vertebral members of a patient employing the surgical tool; releasing the engagement member at the distal end of the elongate shaft from engagement with the intervertebral device; and thereafter, retracting the anti-rotation member from engagement with the intervertebral device.
Further, additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Generally stated, disclosed herein are various surgical inserter tools and methods for facilitating positioning of an intervertebral device between vertebral members of a patient. The intervertebral device may comprise a spacer having any one of various spherical, non-spherical, oblong, etc. shapes. By way of example, one non-spherical-shaped embodiment of a spacer, disclosed in the above-incorporated patent application entitled “Non-Circular Stabilization Sphere and Method” is described below with reference to
As shown in
The non-spherical shape of spacer 100 facilitates maintaining the orientation of spacer 100 with the inferior 128 and superior 129 surfaces thereof in contact with the vertebral members 10. As shown in
As shown in
By way of example, when spacer 100 rotates in a first direction (clockwise), a lower surface of second section 121 contacts the lower vertebral member to prevent contact of openings 130 & 132 with the upper vertebral member. When spacer 100 rotates in a second direction (counter-clockwise), an upper surface of second section 121 contacts the upper vertebral member to prevent the openings 130, 132 from contacting the lower vertebral member.
Those skilled in the art should note that the term “vertebral member” is used generally herein to describe the vertebral geometry comprising the vertebral body, pedicles, lamina, and processes. Likewise, the term “intervertebral space” is used generally to describe the space between vertebral members. The intervertebral space may be formed between adjacent vertebral members, or between non-adjacent vertebral members. The intervertebral device, e.g., spacer 100, may be sized and shaped, and have adequate strength requirements to be used within the different regions of the spine. Although the devices and methods illustrated and described above are particularly useful in treating the lumbar region of the spine, it should nevertheless be understood that the intervertebral device may be positioned in other portions of the spine, including the cervical, thoracic, and sacro-iliac regions.
The embodiment of
The term “spacer 100” is used herein in a general sense to describe an intervertebral device that is positioned between vertebral members. In one embodiment, spacer 100 is an implant that remains within the body. In another embodiment, spacer 100 is a jib which is a fixture or device to guide or hold a cutting, measuring, or space maintaining device in order to prepare a location, such as a vertebral member or intervertebral space, in order to receive an implant. In these embodiments, spacer 100 may be removed from the body at the completion of the procedure.
Other intervertebral device embodiments may be carried out in other specific ways than those herein set forth without departing from the scope of the present invention. The terms “upper”, “lower”, “inner”, “outer”, and the like are terms to describe the relative positioning of different elements, and are used in a general sense. Spacer 100 may be solid, as illustrated in
A first embodiment of a surgical inserter tool, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention, is illustrated in
As shown in
As shown in
Referring first to
This embodiment again includes an elongate anti-rotation sleeve 805 which is movably mounted to the elongate shaft 900. Sleeve 805 again includes a distal end 810 and proximal end 820. Distal end 810 has an anti-rotation member 812 extending therefrom in a direction parallel to threaded member 912 at the distal end 910 of shaft 900. Sleeve 805 is further formed with a grip 822 adjacent to proximal end 820 to facilitate handling of the anti-rotation sleeve.
As shown in
One embodiment of the above-described spring-biased latch mechanism is illustrated in greater detail in the enlarged depictions of
In operation, when first end 842 of member 950 is downwardly compressively engaged, spring 1100 compresses, allowing pivoting of member 950 about pivot 1120 and raising of second end 844 of the member from engagement with sleeve 805. By lifting second end 844 from engagement with sleeve 805, reciprocation of sleeve 805 relative to shaft 905 is possible. When the downward compressive force is removed from first end 842 of member 950, spring biasing 1100 forces second end 844 back into engagement with sleeve 805, and thereby locks sleeve 805 relative to shaft 950. Note that in this embodiment, the length of groove 960 in sleeve 805 corresponds to the distance between the retracted and extended positions of the sleeve relative to the inserter shaft.
Referring to
In the illustrated embodiment, the actuation mechanism for this tool includes an actuation cover 1335 integrally formed with the proximal end 1320 of sleeve 1305. The proximal end 1420 of shaft 1400 includes a handle 1350 and an impaction cap 1370 mounted thereto in a manner similar to that described above in connection with surgical tool 800 of
In this tool embodiment, elongate inserter shaft 1400 includes a stepped-out shaft 1425 of larger diameter which resides at least partially within a center opening formed in actuation cover 1335, as well as an intermediate shaft diameter region 1435 within handle 1350 and mated to impaction cap 1370 via a cylindrical sleeve 1360 connected to cap 1370. At least two circumferential grooves 1440 & 1450 are provided in shaft region 1425 residing partially within the actuation cover 1335. The actuation mechanism includes, in this embodiment, two spring-biased latch mechanisms 1460, which are disposed 180 degrees apart about the shaft. Provision of two such latch mechanisms 1460 further ensures locking engagement of the sleeve relative to the shaft notwithstanding impacting of the tool at the impaction cap.
One embodiment of latch mechanism 1460 is depicted in greater detail in
In operation, buttons 1340 at first end 1610 of the latch members are simultaneously compressed, thereby withdrawing member ends 1620 from engagement with shaft region 1425 and allowing reciprocation of sleeve 1305 relative to shaft 1400 between the retracted and extended positions, defined in this embodiment, by the distance between the two circumferential grooves provided in shaft 1400.
Positioning of an intervertebral device between vertebral members of a patient can be accomplished employing any one of the surgical tools illustrated in
Employing of the surgical tool includes: employing the engagement member at the distal end of the elongate shaft of the surgical tool to securely releasably engage the intervertebral device; employing the actuation mechanism of the surgical tool to position the elongate anti-rotation sleeve in the extended position to engage the intervertebral device, and to lock the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft; inserting the intervertebral device between the vertebral members of the patient employing the surgical tool; releasing the engagement member at the distal end of the elongate shaft from engagement with the intervertebral device; and thereafter, retracting the anti-rotation member from engagement with the intervertebral device.
In the embodiments illustrated, the surgical tool further includes an impaction cap coupled to the proximal end of the elongate shaft, and the actuation mechanism locks the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft notwithstanding impacting of the impaction cap during the inserting of the intervertebral device between the vertebral members of the patient. Further, in the embodiments illustrated, the engagement member comprises a threaded member sized to threadably engage a threaded opening in the intervertebral device. Thus, employing the engagement member includes threading the engagement member into the threaded opening of the intervertebral device. Further, employing the actuation mechanism of the surgical tool includes positioning the elongate anti-rotation sleeve in the extended position with the anti-rotation member mated within a corresponding anti-rotation opening within the intervertebral device.
Still further, the surgical tool may include threads disposed adjacent to the proximal end thereof, and the actuation mechanism may comprise a locking collar threadably engaging the threads of the elongate shaft and mechanically coupling to the proximal end of the elongate anti-rotation sleeve. In this tool embodiment, employing of the actuation mechanism includes threading the locking collar along the threads of the elongate shaft to position the elongate anti-rotation sleeve in the extended position and lock the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft.
In another configuration outlined above, the actuation mechanism of the surgical tool includes at least one spring-biased latch mechanism, which is biased to lock the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft. In this embodiment, employing of the actuation mechanism includes compressively engaging the at least one spring-biased latch mechanism to allow for reciprocation of the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft between the retracted and extended positions, and releasing compressive engagement of the at least one spring-biased latch mechanism once in the extended position to allow the at least one spring-biased latch mechanism to lock the elongate anti-rotation sleeve relative to the elongate shaft in the extended position.
Although preferred embodiments have been depicted and described in detail herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that various modifications, additions, substitutions and the like can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention and these are therefore considered to be within the scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5885299 | Winslow et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6004326 | Castro et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6074423 | Lawson | Jun 2000 | A |
6083225 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6200322 | Branch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224607 | Michelson | May 2001 | B1 |
6290724 | Marino | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6423095 | Van Hoeck et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6562041 | Yonemura et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6610089 | Liu et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6709439 | Rogers et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6733535 | Michelson | May 2004 | B2 |
6805716 | Ralph et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7278995 | Nichols et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20020032448 | Houfburg | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058950 | Winterbottom et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020116006 | Cohen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030135275 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135276 | Eckman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135278 | Eckman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040059337 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040106996 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147937 | Dunbar, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040267275 | Cournoyer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010294 | Michelson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021041 | Michelson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027300 | Hawkins et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060035 | Errico et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090824 | Shluzas et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113920 | Foley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131420 | Techiera et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137593 | Gray et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149036 | Varieur et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149191 | Cragg et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165406 | Assell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192671 | Bao et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209693 | Lo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256575 | Pavlov et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273167 | Triplett et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004455 | Leonard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060241761 | Gately | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
7-163582 | Jun 1995 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070191859 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |