1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to suspended support systems and, more particularly, to a cable support system capable of being suspended.
2. Description of Related Art
Cable suspension systems have been developed to provide the additional utility space needed in various different conduit or cable intensive environments where the original construction did not provide adequate means of accommodating the vast amount of conduit or cable. For example, probably the most common environment requiring vast amounts of additional protected space is for large computing systems. Such installations were typically made in facilities which simply were not designed to accommodate the vast amount of cable runs required to operate the typical large computer system. Other applications where additional utility space is required include mechanical systems, e.g., heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems.
A common problem experienced in utilizing cable suspension systems is maintaining organization of the various cables, conduits, pipes, etc. which are routed above the floor, proximate the ceiling and the like. One solution to this problem is to provide a cable tray system suspended from the ceiling to contain and direct cables along their respective pathways.
One drawback of such a suspension systems is the additional labor required to assemble the various components of the separate sections making up the suspension system. In geographic regions with particularly high labor rates, the cost of erecting such a labor intensive system could prove to be cost prohibitive. An additional drawback of such systems is the high cost of storing and shipping the components of the system in that the components may not be readily stacked and/or nested in order to reduce storage space and the like.
Accordingly, there is a continuing need for improved cable suspension and management systems which require a fewer number of components.
A need also exists for cable suspension and management systems which are easier to install than existing systems and which provide increased storage capacity and accessibility.
An additional need exists for cable suspension and management systems which require reduced storage space and reduced shipping costs.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a suspended cable support system is provided. The suspended cable support system includes a plurality of suspension rods; and at least one cable tray. Each cable tray includes a pair of stringer elements, wherein each stringer element is configured for connection to at least one suspension rod; and a channel section depending from the pair of stringer elements. The channel section defines a passageway for supporting runs of cable thereon. The channel section includes a plurality of riser portions connected to the pair of stringer elements.
The channel section may be formed of wire stock. Each stringer element may include a pair of spaced apart rails. The channel section may define a floor spaced a distance from a plane defined by the pair of stringer elements, wherein the floor is supported by the riser portions.
The channel section may include a plurality of longitudinal sections and a plurality of transverse sections defining a cage-like enclosure. The longitudinal sections may be disposed beneath the transverse sections. The channel section may further include at least one transversely extending reinforcing rib disposed beneath the longitudinal sections.
The channel section may be arcuate or substantially T-shaped. The suspended cable support system may further include a divider configured for selective connection to the channel section for dividing the passageway.
The suspended cable support system may further include at least one suspension bracket configured for connection to the channel section; and a cable management system selectively connectable to the suspension bracket so as to depend therefrom. The cable management system may include a plurality of cable supports depending from a bendable spine. Each suspension bracket may be configured for connection on a top surface of a stringer element.
The suspended cable support system may further include a strut supported beneath at least one of the stringer elements. Each strut may have a substantially U-shaped transverse cross-sectional profile.
The suspended cable support system may further include a plurality of cable trays, and at least one hinge interconnecting adjacent cable trays to enable adjacent cable trays to bend off-axis relative to one another.
The cable trays may be configured for stacking one on top of another in a nesting fashion.
The suspension rods may extend between the pair of rails of the stringer elements.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a cable tray, for use in a cable support system including a plurality of suspension rods, is provided. The cable tray includes a pair of stringer elements each having a pair of spaced apart rails, wherein at least one suspension rod of the cable support system extends between the pair of rails; and a channel section depending from the pair of stringer elements, wherein the channel section defines a passageway for supporting runs of cable thereon. The channel section includes a plurality of riser portions connected to the pair of stringer elements; a floor spaced a distance from a plane defined by the pair of stringer elements, wherein the floor is supported by the riser portions; and a plurality of longitudinal section and a plurality of transverse sections defining a cage-like enclosure.
The longitudinal sections may be disposed beneath the transverse sections. The channel section may include at least one transversely extending reinforcing rib disposed beneath the longitudinal sections.
The cable trays may be configured for stacking one on top of another in a nesting fashion. The cable trays are at least one of arcuate and T-shaped.
According to a further aspect of the present disclosure, a cable support system is provided. The cable support system includes a plurality of suspension rods; and at least one cable tray supported on at least one of the plurality of suspension rods. Each cable tray includes a first stringer element defined by a pair of spaced apart rails; at least a second stringer element defined by a pair of spaced apart rails, wherein the first and second stringer elements are spaced apart from one another and each stringer element is configured for connection to at least one suspension rod; and a channel section depending from the pair of stringer elements, the channel section defining a passageway for supporting runs of cable thereon, the channel section including a plurality of riser portions connected to the pair of stringer elements. The cable trays are configured for stacking one on top of another in a nesting fashion.
The channel section may be formed of wire stock. The channel section may define a floor spaced a distance from a plane defined by the pair of stringer elements. The floor may be supported by the riser portions. The channel section may include a plurality of longitudinal sections and a plurality of transverse sections defining a cage-like enclosure.
The cable support system may further include a divider configured for selective connection to the channel section for longitudinally dividing the passageway.
The cable support system may still further include at least one suspension bracket configured for connection to the channel section; and a cable management system selectively connectable to the suspension bracket so as to depend therefrom. The cable management system may include a plurality of cable supports depending from a bendable spine.
The cable support system may further include a strut supported beneath at least one of the stringer elements. Each strut may have a substantially U-shaped transverse cross-sectional profile.
The cable support system may further include a plurality of cable trays, and at least one hinge interconnecting adjacent cable trays to enable adjacent cable trays to bend off-axis relative to one another.
The pair of rails of each stringer element may be spaced apart an amount sufficient for the suspension rods to extend therebetween.
Preferred embodiments of the presently disclosed cable suspension and support system are described herein with reference to the drawings, wherein:
Referring now in specific detail to the drawings in which like reference numerals identify similar or identical elements throughout the several views, and initially to
Generally, cable support system 100 includes a series of suspension rods or the like 20 depending from a ceiling, soffit, rafter or other suitable over-head structure (not shown). Cable support system 100 further includes any number of linear cable trays 110, T-shaped cable trays 120 and/or arcuate cable trays 130. It is contemplated and understood that the number of cable trays 110, 120 and 130 may vary from installation to installation depending on the need and configuration of the supporting structure.
As seen in
Turning now to
As best seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
Turning now to
As seen in
Turning now to
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
Although the illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be affected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. All such changes and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/844,480, filed on Sep. 14, 2006, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 573835 | Taylor | Dec 1896 | A |
| 804906 | Wheeler | Nov 1905 | A |
| 1236318 | King | Aug 1917 | A |
| 1421705 | Melish | Jul 1922 | A |
| 1681418 | Livesay | Aug 1928 | A |
| 1788724 | Libera | Jan 1931 | A |
| 2149821 | Sutherland | Mar 1939 | A |
| 2191693 | Havlis | Feb 1940 | A |
| 2467411 | Tingdale | Apr 1949 | A |
| 2620074 | Moore, Jr. | Dec 1952 | A |
| 3203558 | Ullman | Aug 1965 | A |
| 3363048 | Vaughn | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3503521 | Rogus | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3752352 | Senecal | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3805964 | Titus, Jr. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3817395 | LeFever | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3844440 | Hadfield et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3951270 | Kiss | Apr 1976 | A |
| 4124324 | Augis et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4162730 | Steere et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4372510 | Skypala | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4456125 | Chap | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4593499 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4596095 | Chalfant | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4612746 | Higgins | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4630417 | Collier | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4637181 | Cohen | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4676036 | Bessert | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4765495 | Bisk | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4765576 | Peled | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4850162 | Albrecht | Jul 1989 | A |
| 5049700 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5100008 | O'Herron | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5123618 | Gutterman et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5169010 | Fortner | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5263289 | Boyd | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5384937 | Simon | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5389737 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5409192 | Oliver | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5412914 | Daw et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5423437 | Kayem | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5460279 | Emery et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5460280 | Feddeler | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5477649 | Bessert | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5483776 | Poppe | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5548932 | Mead | Aug 1996 | A |
| RE35479 | Witherbee et al. | Mar 1997 | E |
| 5628157 | Chen | May 1997 | A |
| 5630300 | Chen | May 1997 | A |
| 5673522 | Schilham | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5697193 | Forslund, III et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5727700 | Digney | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5768840 | Feldpausch et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5775209 | Tiemann | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5875902 | Emery et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893539 | Tran et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5901515 | Chen | May 1999 | A |
| 5946867 | Snider et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6019323 | Jette | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6059258 | Jackson | May 2000 | A |
| 6209267 | Dantzer | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6247871 | Nickel et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6286691 | Oberhaus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6329591 | Karst et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
| 6336296 | Ishibashi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6341704 | Michel, Jr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6347493 | Jette | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6354048 | Gillett et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6397539 | Kimura | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6409031 | Wynne | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6427400 | Greenblatt | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6595120 | Tiemann | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6637704 | Jette | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6688478 | Miller et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6855884 | Spagnoli et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 7544895 | Penichon | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7546987 | Sinkoff | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7597203 | Jasniy | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 20020008074 | Spencer | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020023888 | Wynne et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20070119805 | Nawrocki | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080017760 | Larsen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080264883 | Stafford et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090008512 | Davis et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2155 625 | Nov 1971 | DE |
| 0399 790 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0 683 554 | Nov 1995 | EP |
| 2 599 906 | Dec 1987 | FR |
| 2 015 268 | Sep 1979 | GB |
| 6-272365 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 6-317005 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| WO 9010966 | Sep 1990 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080066401 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60844480 | Sep 2006 | US |