The invention relates to a suspension assembly for suspending a cabin of a truck or the like vehicle. Such a suspension assembly is generally referred to and will hereinafter be referred to as ‘a secondary suspension assembly’, in contrast to ‘a primary suspension assembly’, used for suspending the vehicle wheels.
Typically, a secondary suspension assembly comprises a number of spring members arranged between the cabin and a chassis of the vehicle. To enhance driving comfort, the spring members preferably have a relatively low spring stiffness. This, however, may cause the cabin to experience rather large displacements during use, such as large roll motions when negotiating bends. The latter may affect the vehicle's steering behaviour. To reduce this problem, known suspension assemblies are equipped with a torsion bar, connecting a left and right side spring member so as to increase the overall roll stiffness of the assembly. The torsion bar may furthermore serve to guide vertical movements of the cabin and to facilitate tilting forward thereof, to provide access to components lying underneath the cabin, such as a motor.
To effectively decrease aforementioned roll motions, the torsion bar should have a relatively high torsion stiffness. This, however, may affect the driving comfort, for instance in situations where the left and right wheels of the vehicle are excited asymmetrically.
Therefore, a need exists for an improved secondary suspension assembly, which on the one hand provides for enhanced roll behaviour and steering behaviour and at the other hand provides for acceptable driving comfort.
To that end, an assembly according to the invention is characterized in that an actuator is provided with which a torsion angle of the torsion bar can be adjusted. Accordingly, the torsion bar can be used for active roll stabilisation by counteracting any roll motions of the cabin. As a consequence, the suspension members and the torsion bar can each have a relatively low stiffness, now that large cabin displacements caused by such low stiffnesses can be effectively suppressed. The low stiffnesses will prevent high frequent disturbances from exciting the cabin and as such enhance the driving comfort.
According to one aspect of the invention, the actuator can be arranged near an end of the torsion bar. Alternatively, the actuator may be positioned somewhere halfway, interconnecting two parts of the torsion bar. The position of the actuator can thus be freely varied, enabling efficient use of space. In case where the actuator is of the hydraulic type, its position may for instance be chosen so as to minimize the length of hydraulic supply and return lines, which will benefit its dynamic behaviour, e.g. its response time.
According to another aspect of the invention, the torsion bar can be coupled to the cabin by means of one or more ball joints. These ball joints can adapt their orientation to misalignments and/or deformations of the torsion bar, thereby allowing the torsion bar to pivot smoothly during use, without excessive frictional forces and/or excessive deformation stresses in the respective components.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, the actuator can be a hydraulic actuator. Such hydraulic actuator can be fed by a hydraulic supply circuit with a reservoir, a pump and control means for controlling the flow rate to and from the actuator or the pressure levels in the actuator. The pump may be driven by the combustion motor of the truck. Alternatively, the pump can be driven by a separate motor, for instance an electric motor. Such separate motor allows the actuator to be operated completely independent from the combustion motor, thus allowing active roll stabilisation to be in action when the combustion motor is shut off, and vice versa. By switching the motor on and off strategically, energy can be saved while an acceptable level of driving comfort can be maintained.
According to another aspect of the invention, the assembly may comprise a stabiliser bar, arranged to have its torsion axis extend substantially parallel to that of the torsion bar. Such stabiliser can provide for residual roll stiffness when the active roll stabilisation is deactivated. It furthermore can guide the cabin in vertical direction and help to stabilize it in the horizontal plane. It may also facilitate tilting forward of the cabin.
According to a further aspect of the invention, active roll stabilisation may be based on various control strategies. According to one control strategy, the roll motions may be suppressed completely, so as to keep the cabin substantially horizontally or at least parallel to the road surface. Such control strategy may greatly facilitate the steering behaviour of the truck. According to an alternative control strategy, the roll motions may be controlled to keep the cabin substantially in parallel with the chassis of the truck. Such control strategy helps to provide the driver with a realistic feeling of the actual truck and/or cabin motions and as such may help in achieving safe driving behaviour.
Additionally or alternatively the control strategy may depend on the driving conditions. For instance, when driving straight forward, at relatively high speeds, the cabin is likely to experience little roll motions. Accordingly, the active roll control may be switched off and energy may be saved. When driving at relatively low speeds, the cabin is more likely to experience roll motions, which may for instance be induced by road turns and/or a bumpy road surface. In such case, the active roll control may be switched on to its fullest. Other control strategies and/or combinations thereof are conceivable.
Further advantageous embodiments of an assembly according to the invention and a truck provided therewith are set forth in the dependent claims.
To explain the invention, exemplary embodiments thereof will hereinafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The assembly 1 further comprises a torsion bar 5 which extends between the front spring members 4A, B, an actuator 6 for adjusting a torsion angle of said torsion bar 5, measurement means Si for measuring a roll parameter of the cabin 2, and a control unit 30 for controlling the actuator 6 based on data received from the measurement means Si. It is noted that the term “bar” should be interpreted broadly and not be limited to a straight bar.
As best seen in
The actuator 6 may be mounted in the midsection 11 of the torsion bar 5, as schematically shown in
The suspension assembly 1 functions as follows. During use, when driving over an irregular road surface or when taking turns, the cabin 2 will be subject to roll motions (i.e. rotations around a longitudinal axis L of the truck 10, see
The actuator 6 may be a hydraulic rotation actuator, with for instance four chambers I-IV, as shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the valves include a fail-safe valve 32, arranged to cut off any supply to and from the actuator 6, in case of some failure in for instance the supply circuit 25. The valves furthermore include a pressure control valve 31, for controlling a pressure difference or anti-roll moment at the actuator side. The pressure control valve 31 may for instance be a proportional control valve 31 (as illustrated in
The pumping means 29 may be driven by the combustion motor of the truck 10. Alternatively, a separate motor may be provided, for instance an electric motor 35 as shown in
The decision to switch the motor 35 on or off may for instance be based on the velocity of the truck 10, which can be readily measured with suitable sensors. As long as the velocity is relatively high, for instance above 60 km/hr, the driver is not likely to effect considerable steering actions and consequently roll disturbances are not likely to occur. Consequently, the roll stabilisation feature can be deactivated with relatively little risk and/or little loss in drive comfort. As the velocity drops below a certain threshold value, for instance below 50 km/h, the motor 35 may be switched on again. Of course these values are for illustrative purposes only. They should not be construed as limiting.
To provide the suspension assembly 1 with sufficient residual roll stiffness in case where the motor 35 and active roll stabilisation are switched off, the assembly 1 may be provided with a supplementary bar or stabiliser bar 25, extending substantially parallel to the torsion bar 5 as schematically shown in
When the motor 35 is switched on again, it may take some time before sufficient hydraulic pressure has built up for the actuator 6 to be able to deliver a certain anti-roll moment. This response time may be taken into account when deciding when to switch the motor 25 off and on. Also, the need for active roll stabilization may be anticipated by monitoring precursors of external roll disturbances, such as for instance the steering angle (assuming that a steering angle ushers a turn and a turn invokes roll disturbances). The motor 35 can then be restarted in an early stage, so as to allow the assembly 1 sufficient time to built up the necessary hydraulic pressure.
Alternatively, the hydraulic actuator 6 can be combined with a hydraulic circuit 125 according to
The circuit 125 of
The circuit 125 according to
Furthermore, any other pressure peaks that may arise in the circuit 125 during use can be reduced or equalized by the buffering action of the accumulator 140. This too is beneficial for the driving comfort. In addition, the closed centre configuration of the valves 131A, B allows for a relatively simple fail safe valve 132. Generally, such fail safe valve 132 will feature a safety mode in which hydraulic fluid is allowed to return to the reservoir 126. Consequently, in case of any failure, the pressure in the circuit 125 can be prevented from becoming too high, thereby protecting the pumping means 129 from becoming damaged. With the closed centre configuration of the valves 131A, B the aforementioned safety provision can be fulfilled by the pressure relief valve 142, which will simply open to the reservoir 126 when the pressure in the high pressure zone H exceeds a certain, predetermined level. Alternatively or additionally, the motor 135 can be designed to switch off. As a consequence, the fail safe valve 132 no longer has to include the aforementioned open safety mode. Instead, it can be designed to be completely closed in said safety mode, which allows for a more simple design.
The invention is not in any way limited to the exemplary embodiments presented in the description and drawing. All combinations (of parts) of the embodiments shown and described are explicitly understood to be incorporated within this description and are explicitly understood to fall within the scope of the invention. Moreover, many variations are possible within the scope of the invention, as outlined by the claims
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07121695 | Nov 2007 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NL2008/050746 | 11/26/2008 | WO | 00 | 11/4/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/070014 | 6/4/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3298709 | Mercier | Jan 1967 | A |
3396984 | Cadiou | Aug 1968 | A |
4253700 | Di Francescantonio | Mar 1981 | A |
4483409 | Fun | Nov 1984 | A |
4638878 | Komp | Jan 1987 | A |
4903984 | Kajiwara et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5299651 | Wilson | Apr 1994 | A |
6073714 | McHorse et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6206121 | Michel | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6439651 | Johansson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6805361 | Germano et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6874792 | Vortmeyer et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7004870 | Kroppe | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7077226 | Oliver et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7232180 | Biasiotto et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7832739 | Pinkos et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7909339 | Pinkos et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8371562 | Knevels | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20040084857 | Vortmeyer et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20070080011 | Kang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070150144 | Yasui | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080211201 | Nakajima | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080309032 | Keane et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090091094 | Sano | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090152824 | Grieshaber et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100187778 | Grau et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110025000 | Inoue et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110025001 | Kajino | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049818 | Van der Knaap et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20130099455 | Beringer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19533478 | Jan 1997 | DE |
19805463 | Aug 1999 | DE |
102004059274 | Jun 2006 | DE |
10 2005 009 952 | Sep 2006 | DE |
10 2004 017 088 | Mar 2007 | DE |
1719644 | May 2006 | EP |
1 785 293 | May 2007 | EP |
2766422 | Jul 1997 | FR |
52143613 | Nov 1977 | JP |
2000313218 | Nov 2000 | JP |
WO 2005108128 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110057478 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |