Claims
- 1. A load-unload efficient disk drive suspension comprising a load beam having a rigid portion, and a flexure secured to said load beam rigid portion, said flexure comprising a frame and a generally planar tongue cantilevered from said frame to have a free end spaced from said frame, a limiter structure limiting the movement of said flexure tongue relative to said flexure frame to a predetermined range, said limiter structure comprising a centrally located portion of said tongue free end bent to extend out of the plane of said tongue and shaped to extend beyond said tongue free end to intersect with said flexure frame to limit tongue movement relative to said frame to within said predetermined range.
- 2. The load-unload efficient disk drive suspension according to claim 1, in which said flexure tongue free end has an outermost tip, said tip being locally deflected to a plane generally normal to said tongue plane.
- 3. The load-unload efficient disk drive suspension according to claim 1, in which said tongue free end centrally located portion lies within the central one-third of the width of said tongue free end.
- 4. The load-unload efficient disk drive suspension according to claim 3, in which said centrally located portion is centered on the tongue free end longitudinal axis of revolution.
- 5. A load-unload efficient disk drive suspension comprising a load beam having a rigid portion, and a flexure secured to said load beam rigid portion, said flexure comprising a frame and a generally planar tongue cantilevered from said frame to have a free end spaced from said frame, said flexure frame comprising first and second transverse portions and left and right side longitudinally disposed outriggers connected together to define a surrounded opening, said tongue extending into said surrounded opening in cantilevered relation, a limiter structure limiting the movement of said flexure tongue relative to said flexure frame to a predetermined range, said limiter structure comprising a centrally located portion of said tongue free end shaped to extend beyond said tongue free end to intersect with said flexure frame to limit tongue movement relative to said frame to within said predetermined range.
- 6. The load-unload efficient disk drive suspension comprising a load beam and a flexure having a frame and a tongue with a free end forming a limiter structure limiting movement of said tongue free end relative to said frame to a predetermined range. said tongue defining a cut along a transverse line inward of said tongue free end from a first edge of said tongue free end partway across said free end to the centrally located portion of said free end to free a flap of material from said tongue free end and leave an uncut remainder to the second edge of said tongue free end, said flap defining a head including said tongue free end first edge and a neck of reduced extent relative to said head such that said flap is hook-shaped and its head portion extends beyond said tongue free end remainder, said flap being bent into a substantially normal orientation relative to said tongue free end to have said head overlie said flexure frame opposite said tongue free end in spaced relation corresponding to said predetermined range.
- 7. The load-unload efficient disk drive suspension according to claim 6, in which said first and second edges of said tongue free end are spaced laterally of said tongue free end central portion and free of limiter structure.
- 8. The load-unload efficient disk drive suspension according to claim 7, in which said tongue free end centrally located portion lies within the central one-third of the width of said tongue free end.
- 9. The load-unload efficient disk drive suspension according to claim 8, in which said centrally located portion is centered on the tongue free end longitudinal axis of revolution.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/079,300, filed Mar. 25, 1998.
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
5333085 |
Prentice et al. |
Jul 1994 |
|