The present invention deals with the ground contact system of vehicles, in particular suspension devices, and more particularly with the balance of the steering system of steering axles having virtual pivot points. Steering axles having virtual pivot points are those axles having at least one “triangle” formed by two arms connecting different points on the body to different points on the wheel-carrier. U.S. Pat. No. 4,863,188 describes an example of a steering system of this kind. In that patent, the example suspension system has two triangles (lower and upper) each defining a virtual pivot point.
Generally, the term “side pull” is used to mean the tendency a vehicle may have to deviate from travel in a straight line in the absence of any driver operation of the steering wheel. Side pull may have numerous different causes, and these causes are often combined with one another. For example, side pull may result from poorly adjusted suspension (toe in, camber, caster, caster angle), tyres which are faulty, different, badly inflated or inappropriate, an imbalance in the steering system, wind or a transverse inclination of the road.
Side pull associated with an inclination of the road is a well-known problem. Generally speaking, roads have a transverse inclination, known as banking, which is intended to facilitate water run-off. This inclination tends to cause vehicles, because of the caster, to drift to the lowest side of the road, that is to say towards the outside of the road. Caster is useful in stabilising the steering system, but it makes the steering system sensitive to lateral forces acting on the vehicle. This tendency to drift means the driver is obliged to exert effort on steering the vehicle in order to keep travel in a straight line. Vehicle and tyre manufacturers take account of this tendency when designing the vehicle. This is why designs of asymmetrical suspensions capable of compensating this tendency have been drawn up. Similarly, some tyre architectures allow a slight side pull to be generated which, if oriented in the opposite direction to that caused by the banking, may minimise or cancel the force required on the steering wheel to keep travel in a straight line.
In Europe, where the vast majority of vehicles are designed to drive on the right-hand side of the road (this is called “driving on the right”), their design and/or the choice of their tyres are such that side pull associated with an average banking towards the right-hand side of a road can be compensated. However, this configuration is not generally reconsidered for those parts of the market (such as the United Kingdom) where vehicles drive on the left-hand side of the road (this is called “driving on the left”). The problem of side pull associated with banking of the road then becomes more acute, since the corrections made to compensate side pull towards the right inevitably worsen side pull towards the left. This situation is uncomfortable for the driver, who has to exert a constant force on the edge of the steering wheel of the vehicle in order to keep the vehicle in a straight line. Nonetheless, the size of these markets does not justify the specific development of fundamentally different vehicles. Similarly, tyre manufacturers are unwilling to market locally tyres which cause reverse side pull, on the one hand because of the low demand and on the other because of the difficulty in controlling the final destination of products in a European market ruled by the free movement of goods.
The situation described here by way of illustration is not limited to the European market. Other markets have the same problem or the opposite problem. On the other hand, what is described here for the (worst) case of vehicles designed and equipped to compensate side pull is just as true, of course (although to a lesser extent) for a vehicle designed and equipped with tyres for neutral behaviour, for an unbanked road, and which is to be adapted for a market with driving on the right or on the left.
WO 01/56819, which deals with this same question of compensation of side pull, proposes a solution for vehicles equipped with MacPherson steering axles. The solution proposed in that document is not applicable to suspension systems other than MacPherson ones.
It is an object of the invention to provide a solution applicable to the case of steering axles having a virtual pivot point. These axles may, however, also use a MacPherson strut.
The invention relates to a method of compensating side pull in a vehicle, the suspension system of the steering axle of the said vehicle comprising a virtual pivot point, the said method consisting in applying a steering torque to the wheel-carrier by way of one of the arms of the said virtual pivot point.
Preferably, the steering torque is applied to the wheel-carrier in the form of a steering force acting on the point at which the arm is articulated to the wheel-carrier.
Preferably, this steering force is generated by a transverse force acting on the arm.
According to one embodiment, the transverse force is transmitted to the arm by a substantially horizontal spring.
According to another embodiment, the transverse force is transmitted to the arm by a combined spring and shock absorber unit.
Alternatively, the steering force may be generated by a torque acting on the arm.
The method according to the invention may also consist in applying a steering torque to each wheel-carrier of the steering axle respectively, with the two steering torques preferably acting in the same direction.
The invention also relates to a suspension system for a steering axle having a virtual pivot point, in which at least one of the arms of the said virtual pivot point applies a steering torque to the wheel-carrier in the central position of the suspension. The invention also relates to a vehicle comprising this suspension system.
The various principles of the invention will be more apparent with the aid of the description of the figures below:
In order to describe with more precision how a steering system of this kind operates, the explanation below relates primarily to the left-hand part of the axle and the vehicle.
The degree of freedom of steering of the wheel 1g results from the fact that the lower part of the wheel-carrier 2g is connected on the one hand by a lower ball joint 10g to the lower wishbone 4g and on the other by an upper ball joint (11g and 12g) to each upper arm (5g and 6g). In a system of this kind, the pivot axis (AP) of the wheel is the axis (which in this case is substantially vertical) running through the centre of the lower ball joint 10g and the point (CIRg) where the lines of application of the upper arms intersect. This is known as a virtual pivot point, since the point CIRg does not take concrete form as an articulation, as is the case for example with the lower pivot point (lower ball joint 10g). Moreover, the position of the pivot axis is variable, since the triangle formed by the upper arms is deformed substantially during the steering movement.
The steering movement of the wheel-carrier about the pivot axis AP is controlled by the steering rod 7g. According to the invention, use is made of the fact that the ball joints 11g and 12g are at a distance (d) not equal to zero from the pivot axis (AP). This allows a torque Cg which tends to steer the wheel in the desired direction to be transmitted to the wheel-carrier 2g by way of an upper arm. For example, if the rear upper arm 5g exerts on the wheel-carrier a horizontal force {right arrow over (F)} perpendicular to the arm, this force will have the effect of generating a steering torque Cg such that Cg=|{right arrow over (F)}|*d. The force {right arrow over (F)} may have different origins, as will be seen below. By controlling the direction and intensity of the steering force {right arrow over (F)}, and as a function of the distance d, it is thus possible to control the steering torque Cg.
Because steering of the two wheels of the axle is synchronised by the steering rack 8, the effect of the steering torque Cg on side pull will be combined with that of a torque Cd which is simultaneously applied to the wheel 1d on the right if a steering torque Cd of this kind is also generated. Thus, it is the difference between the torques generated on either side of the vehicle which determines the effect on side pull.
The embodiment shown in
Of these two embodiments of the invention, that in
The inclination of the thrust axis of the combined unit may result from the use of an eccentric connection piece. The same or another eccentric piece may also be mounted on the suspension of the opposite wheel in an asymmetric orientation so that each wheel of the steering axle undergoes a corrective effect which is asymmetrical and thus acts in the same direction (towards the right or the left). An eccentricity in the order of 5 to 10 mm generally allows the desired effect to be achieved.
The combined spring and shock absorber unit shown here allows the illustration to be kept simple. However, the same effect is obtained if it is only a spring, or a quasi-combined unit, in other words a combined unit in which the spring bears against the combined unit with only one of its ends, with the other end bearing directly against the body. In the case of only a spring or a quasi-combined unit, it is important to take into account that the orientation of the force transmitted is separate from that of the rod, and that it is the position and direction of the force transmitted by the spring which allows the desired horizontal force {right arrow over (F)}r′ to be generated. The effect can then be achieved in a simple manner, for example by placing a spacer between the spring and the body so that the body transmits to the spring a torque about a transversely directed axis, which takes the form of a horizontal component {right arrow over (F)}r′ on the arm.
Similarly, the combined unit, quasi-combined unit or spring may bear against the front arm (18g) or against an upper arm to give a comparable effect (if this upper arm is part of an upper virtual pivot point).
The inclination of the force transmitted by the spring (or the combined unit) in order to compensate side pull may be added to the normal inclination of this force. What this means is that the combined units are sometimes inclined for example for reasons of the space occupied, but in this case, because the inclination is symmetrical with respect to the two sides of the vehicle, it has no effect on side pull.
The figures show a few examples of embodiments of the invention, but it will be clear that many other variants are possible; in particular, what has been said of the lower arms is entirely applicable to the upper arms, and vice versa.
As has been seen above, the invention may be applied to each side of the axle simultaneously, but it may also be simultaneously applied to the lower pivot point and upper pivot point of one or both of the wheels in order to achieve the desired overall behaviour of the steering system.
In the case of adapting a vehicle whereof the behaviour is known, it is also possible to modify only one side of the vehicle in order to bring about the necessary asymmetry. On the other hand, asymmetry (and hence correction of side pull) may be obtained by using identical elements on either side of the vehicle with each one generating a steering torque in the same direction (and hence asymmetrically with respect to the vehicle), with these two torques cooperating to compensate side pull.
The order of magnitude of the steering torque required may vary for an average vehicle from 2 to 10 Nm for each wheel, depending on the vehicles and the way the tyres are mounted. This correction is only useful in a straight line, that is to say when the wheels are not turned by steering or are turned only to a small extent and when the suspension is in its central position. One way of checking functioning of the system according to the invention is to place the front wheels of the vehicle on ball plates with the steering connecting rods disconnected, and to measure the static restoring torque of each wheel about its central position corresponding to a straight line.
Let us take the example of a vehicle designed for neutral behaviour when driving on the right and having symmetrical suspension systems, or in other words suspension systems not generating any steering torque overall. This vehicle is adapted for driving on the right for example by the specific way in which the tyres are chosen. This vehicle may be adapted for driving on the left in accordance with the principle of the invention by modifying either one or both of its suspension systems. In the case of modifying both sides, identical asymmetrical elements may be used on either side of the vehicle. Overall, this vehicle then needs two different sets of parts so that it can be adapted to the two types of driving. Because of the logistics of the spare parts market, for example, it is preferable to use only one kind of part in a single market or a single part of the market, and adapting the vehicle for driving on the left by changing the set of parts has this advantage.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03/01902 | Feb 2003 | FR | national |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP04/01433 | Feb 2004 | US |
Child | 11203773 | Aug 2005 | US |