Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
This invention is intended to address several design short-comings inherent in all current alpine and Randonee ski boots, namely the relative lack of adjustable fore-aft stiffness and compression and rebound damping. Current ski boots rely on an outer shell of varying stiffness to provide control and comfort, or at most, a minimally adjustable spring, screw, bladder, gas chamber, or elastic rods. The inherent properties of the shell material and these minimally adjustable parts define the performance characteristics of the boot, and as such cannot be altered significantly in any given boot.
The suspension ski boot as described in this application is a combination of existing technologies in a novel fashion. In its most basic form this invention is a ski boot that utilizes a separate adjustable mechanical shock absorber to control the fore-aft (ankle flexion/extension) compression and rebound damping characteristics. In the preferred embodiment, I propose a ski boot that incorporates a rigid pivoting exoskeleton (to provide lateral and torsional stiffness as well as support for the other components), a sub boot (to provide insulation and water-proofing), and a fully adjustable hydraulic shock absorber (to define compression and rebound damping). The novel advantages of this design include maximal lateral stiffness and torsional control (provided by the rigid exoskeleton) with unsurpassed flexibility of control with respect to fore-aft compression and extension (provided by the separate suspension shock absorber). With this system, the skier would be able to control compression speed and damping, rebound speed and damping, and starting and full-compression leg positions. Adjustments in these parameters could be made day-to-day or run-to-run, and could be based on terrain and snow conditions. Comfort and performance would be enhanced. The shock could be disabled for ease of ambulation, thereby further enhancing comfort and flexibility. Disabling the shock would also allow ease of climbing for Randonee systems. The object of the invention is to optimize ski boot performance by separating the necessary boot components, allowing them to be designed to optimize different performance characteristics.
* Numerals in parentheses refer to specific parts of the invention listed in the various drawings.
In its preferred embodiment, this invention is a combination of a rigid, pivoting exoskeleton (providing the lateral stiffness and torsional control), a sub-boot (providing padding, thermal insulation, and water-proofing), and a fully adjustable hydraulic shock absorber (providing adjustable fore-aft stiffness, shock absorption, and rebound damping). The object of the invention is to optimize ski boot performance by separating the necessary boot components, allowing them to be designed to optimize different performance characteristics. The exoskeleton as diagrammed would be cast, forged, or machined from aluminum or similar alloy, or it could be cast or formed from plastic, composite material, carbon fiber, or other similar durable, stiff material. In the preferred embodiment, it would have releasable attachments to fasten it to the sub-boot, which in the preferred embodiment would be simple screw fasteners. The exoskeleton could be permanently bonded to, or be formed with, the shell of the sub-boot. There would be several possibilities for position of the suspension shock absorber. On the compression boot-mounted shock option, the toe cage would have a shock mount, and on the compression ski mounted shock option, this mount would either be on the toe binding, or on the ski itself. The extension boot-mounted shock would attach to the sole in front of the binding, while in the extension ski-mounted option, the shock mount would either be on the rear binding, or on the tail of the ski itself.
In the preferred embodiment, the sub-boot would be much like a typical ski boot, with a plastic shell and a soft liner, but the shell would be thinner, more flexible, and more breathable than a typical ski boot. The liner would be constructed of available breathable waterproof material and insulating padding. The liner would be closed around the skier's leg with closure straps (11). The sub-boot and exoskeleton could also be formed as a single unit to be used in conjunction with a shock absorber, but this would not be the preferred embodiment. The sub-boot would have a reinforced tongue (12), calf support (13), toe cup (14), heel cup (15), and sole (16) providing supportive areas for the sub-boot attachment sites (17). These attachment sites would serve to fix the sub-boot to the exoskeleton.
The shock absorber would be a modification of existing technology. It is not the subject of this patent application other than its inclusion with the other components to control the fore-aft compression and damping control. The primary design is of a compression-based shock system, but the design drawings include a system based on both compression and extension possibilities. In compression-based versions the shock absorber compression resistance could be either pneumatically or spring controlled, and in the extension shock versions, the extension resistance either pneumatically, spring, or elastomer controlled.
A utility patent is requested to cover the proposed invention and any use of any hydraulic shock absorber to control the afore-mentioned properties of a ski boot. The proposed invention is also demonstrably different from the devices described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,694,593, 4,949,480, and 4,777,746. In these inventions the “shock absorber” is either a chamber forming part of the outer wall of the boot and housing “an elastically deformable body”, or a simple plastic spring. These are not true adjustable suspension shock absorbers as currently used in motor sports or mountain biking, as described in this patent application. Furthermore, this invention describes a separable three-component system (exoskeleton, inner liner, and separate suspension shock absorber). Characteristics of each of the elements can be easily separately altered, upgraded, and even exchanged without affecting the other elements. The inventions described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,694,593, 4,949,480, and 4,777,746 are either non-separable, and/or are not as easily tuned, modified, upgraded or exchanged.