The present subject matter relates generally to track-driven work vehicles and, more particularly, to a suspension system for a track assembly of a track-driven work vehicle that includes a rear rocker beam for suspending both a rear idler wheel and a rear roller of the track assembly in tandem relative to a main undercarriage support beam of the suspension system.
Current work vehicles, such as tractors and other agricultural vehicles, include an electronically controlled engine and a transmission, such as a power shift transmission (PST) or a continuously variable transmission (CVT), coupled to the engine. The transmission is, in turn, coupled to at least one drive axle assembly for transferring torque from the transmission to the vehicle's wheels or tracks. For instance, for a four-wheel drive track-driven vehicle, a drive wheel of each front track assembly is typically rotationally coupled to a front axle assembly of the work vehicle for transferring torque transmitted from the engine to the front track assembly, while a drive wheel of each rear track assembly is typically rotationally coupled to a rear axle assembly of the work vehicle for transferring torque transmitted from the engine to the rear track assembly. As is generally understood, each drive wheel may be configured to rotationally engage a corresponding endless track of the associated track assembly such that rotation of the drive wheel rotates the track, thereby allowing the vehicle to be driven forward or backward.
Each track assembly is typically associated with a suspension system having one or more undercarriage support beams. The undercarriage support beam(s) is used to support the vehicle above various load bearing wheels (e.g., roller wheels), which roll on the endless track as the work vehicle traverses a field or other driving surface. For most suspension systems, it is desirable to distribute the weight of the work vehicle across the load bearing wheels to reduce the stresses acting on the track that may otherwise decrease track longevity due to overheating or other weight overload issues, as well as to maintain the endless track in contact with the ground. To allow for such weight distribution across the load bearing wheels, systems must be developed that are designed to dampen movement of one or more system components relative to the other components of the suspension system. Such motion damping not only allows for more even weight distribution and improved track-to-ground contact, but also limits the amount of vibrations transmitted between the track assembly and the vehicle's chassis, thereby increasing the smoothness of the ride and, thus, the operator's comfort level.
To date, various suspension systems have been developed for track assemblies that attempt to provide desired track performance. However, such conventional suspension systems still lack the capability of providing the desired amount of motion damping between the various track components, particularly sufficient vertical damping to accommodate large bumps and/or other significant variations in the ground surface profile
Accordingly, an improved suspension system for use with a track assembly of a track-driven work vehicle would be welcomed in the technology.
Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In one aspect, the present subject matter is directed to a suspension system configured in accordance with one or more embodiments disclosed herein.
In another aspect, the present subject matter is directed to a suspension system for a track assembly of a track driven work vehicle. The suspension system includes a main undercarriage support beam, and front and rear idler wheels coupled to opposed ends of the main undercarriage support beam, with the rear idler wheel being pivotably coupled to the main undercarriage support beam via a rocker beam. The system also includes a separate roller wheel supported relative to the main undercarriage support beam via the rocker beam. The rocker beam is coupled at one end to the rear idler wheel and at an opposed end to the roller wheel.
In a further aspect, the present subject matter is directed to a track assembly for a track-driven work vehicle. The track assembly includes a track, a drive wheel configured to engage the track, front and rear idler wheels around which the track is wrapped, and a plurality of roller wheels positioned between the front and rear idler wheels, with the plurality of roller wheels including a rearward-most roller wheel and at least one additional roller wheel. The track assembly further including a main undercarriage support beam relative to which the front and rear idler wheels and the plurality of roller wheels are suspended. Additionally, the rear idler wheel and the rearward-most roller wheel are suspended relative to the main undercarriage support beam via a rocker beam.
In yet another aspect, the present subject matter is directed to a track-driven work vehicle including a chassis and a track assembly supported relative to the chassis. The track assembly includes a track, a drive wheel configured to engage the track, a main undercarriage support beam coupled to the chassis, as well as a front idler suspension assembly, a roller suspension assembly, and a rear suspension assemblies provided in operative association with the main undercarriage support beam. The front idler suspension assembly includes a front idler wheel and a pivot beam coupled between the main undercarriage support beam and the front idler wheel. The roller suspension assembly includes at least one roller wheel and a roller beam configured to support the at least one roller wheel. The rear suspension assembly includes a rear idler wheel, a rear roller wheel positioned rearward of the at least one roller wheel, and a rocker beam pivotably coupling the rear idler wheel and the rear roller wheel to the main undercarriage support beam.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
In general, the present subject matter is directed to an improved suspension system for a track-driven work vehicle. Specifically, the suspension system includes a rear suspension assembly that allows for a rear idler wheel and a rear roller wheel of the system to be suspended in tandem, thereby providing improved vertical motion damping to accommodate bumps and other ground contour changes, particularly along the along the rear side or portion of the track assembly.
In several embodiments, the rear suspension assembly includes a rear walking or rocker beam that pivotably couples both the rear idler wheel and the adjacent rear roller wheel to a main undercarriage support beam of the suspension system. As such, the rear rocker beam may function to suspend both the rear idler wheel and the rear roller wheel relative to the main undercarriage support beam. For example, the rear rocker beam may extend lengthwise between opposed forward and rear ends, with an intermediate span of the rocker beam extending between its forward and rear ends. In such an embodiment, the rear rocker beam may be coupled to the rear idler wheel at or adjacent to its rear end and to the rear roller wheel at or adjacent to its forward end, with the main undercarriage support beam being pivotably coupled to the rear rocker beam at a central pivot point defined between the forward and rear ends of the rocker beam.
It should be appreciated that the disclosed suspension system provides enhanced motion damping over conventional suspension systems, which can lead to more even weight distribution, better track-to-ground contact, and improved operator comfort. For example, the disclosed system may allow for the independent suspension of the rear idler wheel and the adjacent rear roller wheel relative to the main undercarriage support beam, thereby providing improved vertical compliance to accommodate large bumps and/or other significant variations the ground surface profile along the rear side or portion of the track assembly. Given that the rearward-most wheels of the suspension system are typically the highest contributor or source of vibrations transmitted from the track assembly to the operator's cab, the present subject matter may greatly improve operator comfort and the overall smoothness of the ride.
Referring now to the drawings,
As shown in
It should be appreciated that the configuration of the work vehicle 10 described above and shown in
Referring now to
In one embodiment, one or more components of the suspension system 24 may be pivotally supported on the vehicle chassis 16 (
It should be appreciated that a similar pivotal support arrangement may also be provided on the vehicle chassis 16 inboard of the drive wheel 22 utilizing the inboard pivot pin. For example, the inboard pivot pin may be configured to be received within a suitable opening defined in the adjacent undercarriage support beam(s) for pivotally coupling the support beam(s) to the chassis 16.
It should also be appreciated that the track assembly 12, 14 shown in
Referring now to
In several embodiments, the suspension system 100 includes a main undercarriage support beam 102. In one embodiment, the main undercarriage support beam 102 may be configured to be pivotably coupled to the chassis of an associated vehicle. For instance, the main undercarriage support beam 102 may define openings 104 (e.g., outboard and inboard openings) for receiving suitable pivot pins for coupling the beam 102 to the vehicle's chassis, such as by using the pivot pins described above with reference to
As shown in
In one embodiment, the roller beam 114 may be coupled or suspended relative to the main undercarriage support beam 102 via one or more suspension elements of the roller suspension assembly 106. For instance, as schematically shown in
It should be appreciated that, in other embodiments, the roller suspension assembly 106 may have any other suitable configuration that allows for the disclosed system 100 to generally function as described herein. For instance, another example of a suitable configuration for the roller suspension system 106 is described in International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2019/054038, filed on Feb. 19, 2019 with a priority date of Feb. 22, 2018 and entitled “Suspension System for a Track Band Transmission,” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.
As shown in
As indicated above, the disclosed system 100 further includes a rear suspension assembly 110. As shown in
Specifically, as shown in
As a result of the above-described configuration of the rear suspension assembly 110, loads may be transferred between the rear idler wheel 140 and the rear roller 112C as such wheels 140, 112C are displaced vertically when passing over a bump or other variation in the ground surface contour. For example, as the rear idler wheel 140 pivots upwardly relative to the main undercarriage support beam 102 about the pivot point 154, the opposed end 148 of the rear rocker beam 142 may be forced downwardly, thereby increasing the ground force applied by the rear roller wheel 112C. Similarly, as the rear roller 112C is displaced upwardly, the corresponding upward pivoting movement of the adjacent end 148 of the rear rocker beam 142 results in the opposed end 144 of the rear rocker beam 142 being forced downwardly, thereby increasing the ground force applied by the rear idler wheel 140.
It should be appreciated that the specific location or relative positioning of the pivot point 154 about which the rear rocker beam 142 pivots relative to the main undercarriage support beam 102 may be selected to ensure that the rear suspension assembly 110 generally functions as described herein. For instance, in one embodiment, the pivot point 154 may, for example, be disposed at a location that is in-line with or offset from the bi-sector of the track forces on the front and rear idler wheels 120, 140. Additionally, in one embodiment, the relative positioning of the pivot point 154 may be selected such that the force of the rear idler wheel 140 on the ground is lower than the force applied on the rear roller wheel 112C.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
The present application is based upon and claims the right of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/831,243, filed Apr. 9, 2019, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1506431 | Kegresse | Aug 1924 | A |
1513144 | Wellman | Oct 1924 | A |
1980276 | Kegresse | Nov 1934 | A |
2467947 | Skelton | Apr 1949 | A |
2541943 | Sherman | Feb 1951 | A |
3446302 | Schoonover | May 1969 | A |
3447620 | Schoonover | Jun 1969 | A |
3504753 | Rutley | Apr 1970 | A |
3603423 | Schoonover | Sep 1971 | A |
3613810 | Hetteen | Oct 1971 | A |
3658145 | Bergmann et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3758169 | Trapp | Sep 1973 | A |
3841424 | Purcell et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3861762 | Freedy et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3915509 | Bell | Oct 1975 | A |
3938606 | Yancey | Feb 1976 | A |
3938851 | Shelby | Feb 1976 | A |
4043417 | Orpana | Aug 1977 | A |
4120372 | Hartwich | Oct 1978 | A |
4279318 | Meisel, Jr. | Jul 1981 | A |
4339156 | Livesay | Jul 1982 | A |
4351572 | Fujiwara | Sep 1982 | A |
4462480 | Yasui et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4519654 | Satzler et al. | May 1985 | A |
4582367 | Jacquet et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4647116 | Trask | Mar 1987 | A |
4681177 | Zborowski | Jul 1987 | A |
4708218 | Makela | Nov 1987 | A |
4819754 | Purcell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4923527 | Ludwigson | May 1990 | A |
5031973 | Gillet | Jul 1991 | A |
5293948 | Crabb | Mar 1994 | A |
5316381 | Isaacson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5409075 | Nieman | Apr 1995 | A |
5452949 | Kelderman | Sep 1995 | A |
5456331 | Gustin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5566773 | Gersmann | Oct 1996 | A |
5622234 | Nagorcka et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5692579 | Peppel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5829848 | Kelderman | Nov 1998 | A |
5842757 | Kelderman | Dec 1998 | A |
5873640 | Oertley | Feb 1999 | A |
5899542 | Lykken et al. | May 1999 | A |
5899543 | Lykken et al. | May 1999 | A |
5997109 | Kautsch | Dec 1999 | A |
6006847 | Knight | Dec 1999 | A |
6007166 | Tucker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6027185 | Crabb | Feb 2000 | A |
6112840 | Forbes | Sep 2000 | A |
6135220 | Gleasman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6283562 | Tsubota et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302232 | Forbes | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318484 | Lykken et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6382338 | Forbes | May 2002 | B1 |
6390219 | Vaisanen | May 2002 | B1 |
6431301 | Forbes | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435292 | Lemke | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6585286 | Adema et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607256 | Yoshida | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615939 | Karales | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626258 | Forbes | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6733093 | Deland et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6904986 | Brazier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6951260 | Isley | Oct 2005 | B1 |
RE38858 | Grawey et al. | Nov 2005 | E |
7131507 | Wenger | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7131508 | Brazier | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7296862 | Albright et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7380892 | Rosenboom | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7478688 | Ki | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7533741 | Brazier | May 2009 | B2 |
7552785 | Tuhy | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7597161 | Brazier | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7628235 | Satzler et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7690738 | Wilt | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7712557 | Duceppe | May 2010 | B2 |
7726749 | Rosenboom | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740084 | Rosenboom | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7832508 | Isley | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7862131 | Poirier | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870914 | Todd et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7967087 | Arulraja et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8056655 | Mallette et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8118374 | Canossa | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8147007 | Rainer | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8157335 | Poirier | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8342257 | Rosenboom | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8347991 | Zuchoski et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8607903 | Godin et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8636326 | Inaoka | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8708069 | Allaire | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8727047 | Janzen et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8763716 | Rosenboom | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8851209 | Fukumoto | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8851581 | Marchildon et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875816 | Steltz et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8955925 | Bessette et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9051009 | Prohaska | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9290216 | Fairhead | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9359021 | Janzen et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9394015 | Cox | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9415817 | Rackow et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9415818 | Tiede et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9434426 | Nagorcka et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9440691 | Rosenboom | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9457854 | Van Mill et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9586642 | Mori | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9604682 | Marchildon et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9663164 | Vik et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9764784 | Brazier | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9828047 | Eavenson, Sr. et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9884662 | Eavenson, Sr. et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9937969 | Obermeier-Hartmann et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9950756 | De Boe et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9963177 | Marchildon et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9994268 | Gustafson | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10035551 | Davis et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10059391 | Kirchmair et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10065690 | Summer et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10099733 | Sewell | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10308296 | Piens et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10597098 | Vik et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20010030068 | Nagorkca et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040119336 | Lussier | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050046277 | Simons et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060254832 | Strong | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070029871 | Wake | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080156548 | Mallette et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080196947 | Brazier | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100059297 | Urbanik et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100237574 | Allaire | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110309672 | Thorson | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120090903 | Bessette et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120125701 | Brazier | May 2012 | A1 |
20130092458 | Fairhead | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130119753 | Pare | May 2013 | A1 |
20130154345 | Schulz et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150217816 | Franck | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150321711 | Vik | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150329154 | Roy | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160159414 | Hansen | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160194038 | Jean | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160355221 | Van Mill et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160362150 | Kirchmair et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170036714 | Lunkenbein | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170210436 | Brazier | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170225727 | Sauvageau | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170291652 | Marchildon et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180009490 | Sauvageau et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180022408 | Sauvageau et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180043948 | Johnson | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180086397 | Sauvageau et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180118291 | Sauvageau et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180162464 | Eavenson et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180162465 | Visscher et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2479388 | Mar 2006 | CA |
2395948 | Sep 2000 | CN |
2752135 | Jan 2006 | CN |
101138992 | Oct 2013 | CN |
203681264 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104691633 | Jun 2015 | CN |
204567824 | Aug 2015 | CN |
106494521 | Mar 2017 | CN |
103770634 | Jun 2017 | CN |
107531294 | Jan 2018 | CN |
2949942 | Dec 1979 | DE |
19919959 | Nov 2000 | DE |
202004020124 | Apr 2005 | DE |
202010009744 | Nov 2010 | DE |
2574526 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2301569 | May 1999 | GB |
H09240526 | Sep 1997 | JP |
H09267779 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2000006857 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2010052549 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2446974 | Apr 2012 | RU |
1691210 | Nov 1991 | SU |
WO1997036778 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO2014022042 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO2014022043 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO2016080577 | May 2016 | WO |
WO2017078980 | May 2017 | WO |
WO2018024762 | Feb 2018 | WO |
WO2018024766 | Feb 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 9,783,249 B2, 10/2017, Eavenson, Sr. et al. (withdrawn) |
Peter Hill, “Soft-Shoe Shuffle.” iVT International Industrial Vehicle Technology Magazine, Jun./Jul. 2011, p. 26-30. |
Peter Hill, “Wheels vs. Tracks.” iVT International Industrial Vehicle Technology Magazine, May/Jun. 2008. p. 32-38. |
Track Suspension, ScoutBot 1402 (an Outdoor Robot), Let's Make Robots! RobotShop, dated May 15, 2012, retrieved Aug. 31, 2018 (pp. 1-10) https://www.robotshop.com/letsmakerobots/scoutbot-1402-outdoor-robot?page=1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200324836 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62831243 | Apr 2019 | US |