Patent Grant
11364018
The present invention relates to a swab for collecting biological specimens.
In the field of clinical and diagnostic analyses, swabs for collecting biological specimens of organic material are known, consisting essentially of a cylindrical rod around one end of which, known as the tip, is wrapped a wad of fibre such as rayon or a natural fibre such as cotton, with hydrophilic properties to allow rapid absorption of the quantity of specimen to be collected and tested. Stable adherence of the fibre wrapped around the tip of the rod is generally achieved by gluing.
Usually, especially if the specimen is to be examined by culturing the microorganisms gathered with the collection, a swab is immersed in a test-tube containing culture medium immediately after collection for appropriate conservation of the specimen during storage and/or transport thereof to the analytical laboratory.
An example of this type of device is given in patent EP0643131 by the same Applicant and refers to a swab for collecting and in vitro transporting specimens, of the type comprising a test-tube with culture medium in gel form and a rod carrying at one end a stopper for sealing the test-tube and at the opposite end means for collecting said specimen, for example a wad of fibre wrapped around the tip of the rod, to be dipped into the culture medium.
The tip of the cylindrical rod, generally manufactured from essentially rigid material such as plastic, for example by extrusion, commonly presents a truncating cut which would make it difficult to insert the swab rod into the cavities (oral, nasal, ocular or rectal, urethral, vaginal etc.) of the patient from whom the specimen is taken, if the tip is not adequately protected. Therefore, the wad of hydrophilic fibre wrapped around said truncated end must not only contain sufficient material to allow absorption of the specimen in the desired quantity, in general 100 microlitres, but must also have a sufficiently thick and rounded shape to sheathe the edge of the truncated end so that it cannot cause damage or irritation to the patient during specimen collection. For this reason the fibre wad is wrapped around the tip of the rod in a rounded shape, typically developing into an ogive or similar shape so that it gradually becomes thicker towards the end of the rod thus reaching maximum thickness and therefore maximum protective effect, precisely around the truncated end. A wad of such a shape, while protecting the patient from any risk of contact with said truncated end of the rod, results in a number of drawbacks. The main one is that the thickness of the wad, because of the hydrophilic nature of the fibre, leads to penetration of collected liquid specimen into the mass of said wad. As, for practical reasons, the sample is released from the swab at the moment of analysis by simply gripping the rod of the swab and delicately sliding its tip and hence the fibre impregnated with liquid, along for example a petri dish with culture medium, in practice by spreading the specimen onto this latter (swabbing), even if this operation is repeated and is careful, it does not enable the entire volume e.g. the 100 ml of absorbed specimen to be released, because that part of it which has penetrated into the interior of the wad in the direction of its tip cannot be pressed out towards the surface and hence released by the swab during this operation
Due to this defect, on average only about 40% of the liquid specimen collected can in practice be recovered for analysis. Such loss of specimen translates inevitably into reduced sensitivity of analysis and increased false negatives. In this respect, referring to the aforementioned average specimen loss after swabbing the swab, by testing only the 40 microlitres released for swabbing out of the 100 microlitres of specimen initially collected, it becomes difficult to establish whether a negative test effectively refers to the absence of the microorganism sought or rather to its non- or insufficient transfer from swab to test plate.
A further problem derived from the bulky fibre wad of a swab of the known art is particularly evident for example in the case of urethral or ocular use of said swab. In these and other particular applications it would actually be even more desirable to be able to minimize swab thickness and hence patient discomfort during collection.
As a solution to these problems, and also to achieve other advantages which will be apparent from the description, the present invention proposes a swab for collecting biological specimens of the type consisting of a rod terminating with a tip covered in fibre with hydrophilic properties to allow absorption of said specimens, characterised In that said fibre covers said tip In the form of a layer applied by means of flocking.
With the aim of better understanding the characteristics and advantages of the invention, a non-limiting example of a practical embodiment thereof is described hereinafter, with reference to the figures of the accompanying drawings. Said example refers to the case of a swab suitable for both the collection and storage of a biological specimen, and therefore also includes a test-tube containing a culture medium suitable for the collected microorganisms into which the swab is to be immersed after collection, such as for example the type described in the aforementioned patent EP0643131 by the same Applicant.
With reference to said figures, a device of the invention in accordance with the illustrated example comprises an essentially cylindrical test-tube 10 containing a culture medium in gel form 11, presenting a free surface level 12 inside the test-tube.
The upper open end of the test-tube presents a collar 13 for receiving a closure means.
The device is completed by a swab 20 consisting of a rod 14 carrying at one end a stopper 15 which has to act as the closure means of the test-tube and is hence shaped so that it can engage, for example by snap-engaging, with the collar 13 of the test-tube.
At the opposite end, the rod 14 terminates with a tip 16 carrying a suitable means, for example a layer of fibre 17, for collecting the specimen to be analysed. In the illustrated example, said tip 16 of the rod is shaped in a rounded geometry, similar to an ogive, and said fibre 17 being disposed as a layer of uniform thickness.
In general terms, in accordance with the fundamental characteristic of the invention, said fibre with hydrophilic properties is deposited by means of flocking. The flocking technique is preferably of the type conducted in an electrostatic field which deposits the fibres in an ordered manner, perpendicular to the surface of the tip of the swab rod, which has been previously coated with adhesive for example by immersion or spraying.
The fibre which is to form the flocked layer is subjected to an electrostatic field, and is hence deposited in an oriented manner and anchored to the surface of the tip, being retained by the adhesive.
The adhesive is preferably water-based: once dried it enables the fibre to be anchored in a stable manner to the swab and to resist abrasion.
The flocked swab is then dried by exposing it to a source of heat or radio-frequency.
The tip of the swab stem is covered with a layer of fiber, preferably of uniform thickness, and from 0.6 to 3 mm thick. The fiber count, i.e. the weight in grams per 10,000 linear meters of a single fiber, is preferably between, 1.7 and 3.3 Dtex. In particular, a fiber of 0.6 mm length and 1.7 Dtex can be applied by flocking to obtain a fine nap, and a fiber up to 3 mm in length and 3.3 Dtex can be applied to obtain a long nap, obtaining, for values intermediate between the aforedefined, corresponding intermediate characteristics of thickness and fineness of the flocked layer.
Within the wide choice of such values, the expedient to be respected according to the objects of the invention is to maintain an ordered arrangement of the fibres, substantially parallel to each other and normal to the surface of the rod, avoiding any overlapping of fibres which can occur if the nap is too long. Indeed, in this manner the capillary represented by each fibre, by virtue of which it can carry out its task of absorbing and releasing essentially the same quantity of specimen, remains unimpaired and functional.
The amount of fibre to be deposited for forming the flocked layer in accordance with the invention is determined on the basis of the type of fibre and the pre-chosen layer characteristics of thickness and fineness, in such a manner as to enable 100 microlitres of specimen to be absorbed.
In accordance with the objects of the invention, the fibre is chosen from a wide range of materials provided they are hydrophilic by capillarity, such as for example, synthetic or artificial materials e.g. rayon, polyester, polyamide, carbon fibre or alginate, natural materials e.g. cotton and silk, or mixtures thereof.
Some preparative examples are now given of a swab according to the invention. Such examples are not intended in any way to limit the scope of the invention.
A swab is prepared using a plastic rod, suitable for human clinical collection, of diameter 2.5 mm which decreases to 1 mm over a length of about 6 cm.
The tip of the part with the smallest diameter is dipped in or sprayed with an adhesive, then the rod is placed vertically in a flocking apparatus in electrostatic field to deposit a polyamide flock.
The polyamide flock of 0.7 mm length and 1.7 Dtex allows 0.5 μl per mm2 to be absorbed, therefore by flocking the 10 mm long tip of said rod the absorbing capacity obtained is 40 μl.
Proceeding as per example 1, a rod with a spatulate end is used, suited for example to collecting organic specimens from the oral cavity of a patient. Polyester fibre of 1 mm length and 1.7 Dtex count are used for the flocking.
Proceeding as per examples 1 and 2, polyester fibre of 2 mm length and 2.5 Dtex count is used.
Continuing in general terms, it is calculated that a swab of the invention is capable of releasing about 90% of the absorbed specimen by swabbing, in this manner considerably increasing the sensitivity of the analysis compared with swabs of the known art, in particular by almost completely eliminating the risk of false negatives resulting from the incomplete release of the collected specimen from swab to test plate.
In addition, the fact of being able to form, according to the invention, a fibre layer of any thickness, even very small, around the tip of the rod rather than a mass to cover it, as in the known art, means that the required rounded shape of the swab, i.e. free of edges, no longer has to depend on the mass of fibre itself but on the tip of the rod, which can therefore be preferably shaped into a round form, as indeed occurs in the aforedescribed example and shown in the accompanying drawings. Particularly in specific cases where swabs of the greatest possible thinness are required, for example urethral or ocular, this represents a further definite advantage over known swabs. Indeed a swab can be provided with a rounded tip by virtue of its shaping, around which a thin layer of fibre is deposited by flocking to allow on the one hand collection of a sufficient quantity of specimen for analysis, and on the other to minimize the total bulk of the part of the swab which is to penetrate the urethra, in consequence so reducing the discomfort of the patient undergoing the collection procedure.
The shape given to the tip of the swab nevertheless varies greatly according to the type of collection it is intended for, and can even be truncated or have edges when the type of collection (for example oral) allows it.
According to the invention, the type of adhesive, type of fibre and fibre characteristics, such as length and count, are in any case chosen from a wide range of options in order to obtain an ideal specific marker for identifying the microbiological specimen, whether by a direct diagnostic technique, by immuno-test, or by molecular biology techniques such as PCR, or with other known culturing, enrichment or selection techniques.
The specimen to be collected with a swab of the invention generally consists of bacteria or viruses or DNA or RNA or a mixture thereof
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| MI2003A000643 | Apr 2003 | IT | national |
This Application is a continuation of and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/903,921 entitled “Swab for Collecting Biological Specimens,” filed Oct. 13, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,027, entitled “Swab for Collecting Biological Specimens,” filed Jul. 28, 2005, that claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 365 of PCT/EP2004/003392 filed Mar. 31, 2004, and that claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Italian Application No. MI2003A000643 filed Apr. 1, 2003. Applicant incorporates by reference herein the disclosures of these applications and patent.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3163160 | Cohen | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3434801 | Scherr | Mar 1969 | A |
| 3744499 | Wells | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3776753 | Habib | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3792699 | Tobin et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3854319 | Burroughs et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3881464 | Levene | May 1975 | A |
| 3888629 | Bagshawe | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3900651 | Hoppe et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3954563 | Mennen | May 1976 | A |
| 4030978 | Abramson | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4039934 | Ostashko et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4175560 | Knoll | Nov 1979 | A |
| 4196167 | Olsen | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4227537 | Suciu et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4234316 | Hevey | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4307152 | Mathes et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4326545 | Motegi et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4340670 | Mennen | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4371485 | Mathes et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4421809 | Bish et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4454109 | Hillman | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4525452 | Jones | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4612147 | Haubold et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4687257 | Stem | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4707450 | Nason | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4719181 | Schobel et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4734964 | Lane et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4749655 | Monthony et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4754764 | Bayne | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4759376 | Stormby | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4767398 | Blasius, Jr. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4789639 | Fleming | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4796647 | Gueret | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4856136 | Janssen | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4861343 | Neunzig | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4873992 | Bayne | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4877036 | Saint-Amand | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4877037 | Ko et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4922936 | Buzzi et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4953560 | Samuels | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4974980 | Gueret | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5009846 | Gavet et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5022408 | Mohajer | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5091153 | Bachand | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5163441 | Monthony et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5279964 | Chrisope | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5324128 | Gueret | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5370992 | Shah | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5418136 | Miller | May 1995 | A |
| 5460781 | Hori | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5468606 | Bogart | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5538732 | Smith et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5614375 | Citri | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5623941 | Hedberg et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5627071 | Triva | May 1997 | A |
| 5676643 | Cann et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5704388 | Freeman | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710041 | Moorman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5738643 | Stredic, III | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5869003 | Nason | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5899622 | Gueret | May 1999 | A |
| 5928176 | Nakatani | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5944519 | Griffiths | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6010462 | Stoermer, III | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6033143 | Gueret | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6080126 | Zygmont | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6049934 | Discko | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6232567 | Bonino et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6286246 | Rachal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6306498 | Yunki et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6328159 | Discko, Jr. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6341912 | Gueret | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6352513 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6365794 | Dabi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6376025 | Mark | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6382972 | Fischer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6413087 | Petrich et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420181 | Novak | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6450810 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451607 | Lawrence et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6494856 | Zygmont | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6497688 | Lasko | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6503013 | Strauss | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6541194 | DiCesare | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6625839 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6634051 | Dragan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6638067 | Fischer et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6676609 | Rutenberg et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| D489535 | Dragan | May 2004 | S |
| 6732743 | Bouix et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6881554 | DiCesare et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6887681 | DiCesare et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6929475 | Dragan | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 7022289 | Schlein et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7198623 | Fischer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7261483 | Gueret | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7582067 | Van Acker | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7645608 | Greene | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 8114027 | Triva | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8133193 | Van Acker | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8317728 | Triva | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8631715 | Triva | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8772034 | Rasch-Menges et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9170177 | Triva | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9428788 | Triva | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 20010008614 | Aronowitz et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20020001539 | DiCesare et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197738 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030073932 | Varey | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108846 | Hoertsch | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040014063 | Batteux et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078219 | Kaylor et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158188 | Kauffmann et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040197730 | Rowe et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050181517 | Chandler et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223511 | Mangold et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223512 | Mangold et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267395 | Mangold et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288616 | Bozenbury et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060115805 | Hansen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142668 | Triva | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060211978 | Do | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258250 | Mangold et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070105186 | Gibson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208274 | Ostrowski et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255175 | Sangha | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275101 | Lu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20090024060 | Darrigrand et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030054 | Warmington et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030341 | Kshirsagar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090186057 | Farmer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325861 | Goodheart | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100112725 | Babu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249649 | Larkin | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110281754 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110306078 | Triva | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120150088 | Triva | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120171712 | Triva | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120271196 | Triva | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20170027549 | Triva | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20190008489 | Triva | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190307433 | Triva | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1070850 | Apr 1993 | CN |
| 2183735 | Nov 1994 | CN |
| 2460050 | Nov 2001 | CN |
| 2479505 | Feb 2002 | CN |
| 2554995 | Jun 2003 | CN |
| 201131761 | Oct 2008 | CN |
| 101765551 | Jun 2010 | CN |
| 201993241 | Sep 2011 | CN |
| 2552172 | Jun 1977 | DE |
| 2755341 | Jun 1979 | DE |
| 68904499 | Aug 1993 | DE |
| 298 09 833 | Jun 1998 | DE |
| 69507667 | Jun 1999 | DE |
| 19937571 | Feb 2000 | DE |
| 10246379 | Apr 2004 | DE |
| 0 223 745 | May 1987 | EP |
| 0354823 | Feb 1990 | EP |
| 0 244 156 | Apr 1990 | EP |
| 0 527 909 | Mar 1993 | EP |
| 0 643 131 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 0643134 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 0 568 556 | Jul 1995 | EP |
| 0693263 | Jan 1996 | EP |
| 0 707 836 | Apr 1996 | EP |
| 1 147 746 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1 358 818 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1382730 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 1608268 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 2395337 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 2729545 | Jul 1996 | FR |
| 406850 | Mar 1934 | GB |
| 62231081 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 05-027671 | Apr 1993 | JP |
| 10024065 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 10-192050 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| H 11-514849 | Dec 1999 | JP |
| 2000-152817 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000232982 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2000342591 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| 2001-346626 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002067201 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| A-2004-587 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 4579902 | Nov 2010 | JP |
| 4579902 | Nov 2010 | JP |
| WO 8505296 | Dec 1985 | WO |
| WO 8910724 | Nov 1989 | WO |
| WO 9212863 | Aug 1992 | WO |
| WO9703209 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO 200009984 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO 200054024 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO 2004086979 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| 2005013759 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| 2005110316 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2007075412 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008131033 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| 2009018607 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009140356 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009134509 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009136892 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009158403 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Print of website http://www.flock.de/de/2_1_historie.php, believed to be Jul. 22, 2008, and 43 including what is believed to be an English counterpart to the website printed from Print of website in English http://www.flock.de/pages/html/de/flock/sub/historie.html?lang=EN. |
| BG-Information, BGI 764, p. 7, Oct. 2000, including translation from http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_txt, and further as a concise statement of relevance Applicant submits that the reference was cited in the European Notice of Opposition in EP 04 724 556.8, cited as item 46 herein. |
| A Notice of Rejection for related Japanese patent application No. 2006-504927 (4 pages), dated Feb. 15, 2009. |
| International Search Report (2 pages), for related international application WO 2004/086979, published Oct. 14, 2004. |
| File History for EP Application No. EP04724556, foreign counterpart to present application. |
| Print of Website www.swicofil.com/flock.html, believed to be Aug. 16, 2002. |
| U.S. Patent Office's File for U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,921, filed Oct. 13, 201, entitled “Swab for Collecting Biological Specimens”, inventor Daniele Triva. |
| U.S. Patent Office's File for U.S. Appl. No. 13/361,584, filed Jan. 30, 2012, entitled “Swab for Collecting Biological Specimens”, inventor Daniele Triva. |
| U.S. Patent Office's File for U.S. Appl. No. 13/531,800, filed Jun. 25, 2012, entitled “Swab for Collecting Biological Specimens”, inventor Daniele Triva. |
| U.S. Patent Office's File for U.S. Appl. No. 12/840,087, filed Jul. 20, 2010, entitled “Method for Quantitative Transfer of Analytes”, inventor Daniele Triva. |
| U.S. Patent Office's File for U.S. Appl. No. 13/043,175, filed Mar. 8, 2011, entitled “A Process for Realising a Device for Collecting and Transferring Samples for Molecular Biology”, inventor Daniele Triva. |
| U.S. Patent Office's File for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,376, filed Oct. 26, 2012, entitled “A Device and a Method for Collecting and Transferring Samples of Biological Material”, inventor Daniele Triva. |
| “Flock 2003” Int. Flock Symposium, Apr. 2003, Dresden (3 pages). |
| Cotton—Facts and General Information from Swicofil, http://www.swicofil.com/products/001cotton.html, Jan. 3, 2011, (9 pages). |
| Cotton—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.\wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton, Jan. 3, 2011 (12pages). |
| Microrheologics, “New Technology for Sample Collection” 2006, (2 pages). |
| Millipore, “Flocked Swabs” 2007, (2 pages). |
| What is Cotton Fibre/Properties of Cotton Fiber, http://articles.textileclass.com/cotton-fibre-what-is-cotton-fibre-cotton-f, May 11, 2011, (1 page). |
| Wikipedia, “Cotton Swab” http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton swab, Jun. 22, 2011 (3 pages). |
| Wikipedia, “Swab” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swab, Jun. 22, 2011 (1 page). |
| Decision of Opposition Proceedings dated Jan. 25, 2011 in EP Application No. 0472556.8, foreign counterpart to present application (13 pages). |
| Decision Under Appeal (30 pages) for European application No. 04724556.8-2113, mailed Nov. 18, 2011. |
| International Search Report (2 pages) and Written Opinion (5 pages), for international application IT MI20 11 0004, dated Jul. 20, 2011. |
| International Search Report (4 pages) and Written Opinion (7 pages), for international application IT MI20101032, dated Feb. 24, 2011. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2007 in related Canadian application No. 2,515,205 (11 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2009 in related Australian application No. 2004226798(2 pages). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2007 in related Australian application No. 541560 (2 pages). |
| Opposition filed 2011 against related Japanese application No. 2006-504297 , including English translation (12 pages). |
| U.S. Patent Office's File for U.S. Appl. No. 10/543,873, filed Jul. 28, 2005, entitled “Swab for Collecting Biological Specimens”, inventor Daniele Triva, 758 pages. |
| U.S. Patent Office's File for U.S. Appl. No. 13/899,394, filed May 21, 2013, entitled “Swab for Collecting Biological Specimens”, inventor Daniele Triva, 42 pages. |
| Applied Biosystems, Benchmarking of applicators, Dec. 19, 2006, 26 pages. |
| Verhoeven et al. Better Detection of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage by Use of Nylon Flocked Swabs, JCM, vol. 48, No. 11, Nov. 2010; 3 pages. |
| Chernesky et al. Use of Flocked Swabs and a Universal Transport Medium to Enhance Molecular Detection of Chlamydia trachomastis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae; JCM, vol. 44, No. 3, Mar. 2006, 3 pages. |
| Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services, US Dept, of Health and Human Services; Public Health Service, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, p. 196; 1994. |
| Hedin et al., New Technique to Take Samples from Environmental Surfaces Using Flocked Nylon Swabs; Journal of Hospital Infection 75 (2010); 4 pages. |
| Moore et al. Dry Cotton or Flocked Respiratory Swabs as a Simple Collection Technique for the Molecular Detection of Respiratory Viruses Using Real-Time NASBA, JVM 153 (2008) 6 pages. |
| Principles of Nonwovens, INDA, Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry, Cotton's Unique Fiber Morphology, 1992, 11 pages. |
| Relationship between flock length, fineness, thinness and process ability, Table 5 with English translation; p. 194,Leipzig 1993, 2 pages. |
| Schenk, “Flock Trials in Laboratory With Alternating Current”, International Flock Seminar, Sep. 8-10, 1980, 2 pages. |
| Flock Technology, Technical Academy of Esslingen; DE, Flock Diagram (with English Translation of Diagram) No. 13798/46.074, Apr. 17, 1991; 6 pages. |
| Gabler; Studies on the Electrostatic Flocking (with English translation of table); RWTH Aachen Univ. Germany, 1980; 1 page. |
| M. Mulder, Practical Guide for General Nursing Science Part 2 ; p. 195; May 31, 1999, 2 pages. |
| Specimen Submission Procedure for Gynecologic Cytology and HPV Testing, Dept. of Pathology, Crittenton Hospital Medical Pathology Department; 6 pages, Oct. 2014. |
| German Application No. 20 2004 021 932.8, Order Pronounced in the Oral Proceedings of Sep. 30, 2015, 32 pages. |
| German Application No. 20 2004 021 930.1, Order Pronounced in the Oral Proceedings of Jun. 9, 2015, 16 pages. |
| Response to the Appeal filed re German Utility Model DE202004021930U1 on Nov. 21, 2014 (12 pages). |
| Register excerpt of UTM DE20 2004 021930 U1 , Nov. 6, 2013, 3 pages (machine translation). |
| Appeal reasoning of Jul. 1, 2011, complaint T0954/11-3202 in EP Patent No. 1,608,268; 12 pages (machine translation). |
| Int. Flock Symposium in Dresden excerpt Mar. 31-Apr. 1, 2003, 2 pages (machine translation). |
| Int. Flock Symposium—Addendum to the General Assembly of the Assoc, of Flock Ind.; FLOCK vol. 16, Nr. 60/1990; Oct. 1990, 1 page (machine translation). |
| J.N. Bersev et al. ,,Elektrostatische Beflockung, Leipzig, 1993, pp. 127-129 (machine translation). |
| Table 5 page 194 of J.N. Bersev et al. ,,Elektrostatische Beflockung, Leipzig, 1993, (machine translation). |
| Gabler, Untersuchungen zum elektrostatisches Beflocken, RWTH Aachen, 1980, p. 1 (machine translation). |
| Grounds for Appeal dated Feb. 27, 2014, German Application No. Az. 20 2004 021 787.2, 13 pages (machine translation). |
| Opinion on Contrary Justification—dated Jun. 30, 2014, German Application No. Az. 20 2004 021 787.2, 27 pages (machine translation). |
| EP1608268_Observations filed by other party Jan. 30, 2009, 9 pages. |
| EP1608268—Reply on behalf of patent proprietor re grounds of appeal—Nov. 18, 2011, 30 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition to European Patent No. 1608268 on Aug. 21, 2008, 15 pages. |
| EP1608268—Observations on behalf of Proprietor in reply to Opposition Brief dated Jan. 30, 2009, 15 pages. |
| Genetic Background, Basic Techniques for Bacterial Genetics, 3 pages. |
| Streaking out individual colonies—2 days before lab, 2 pages. |
| Traditional Method of Pure Culture Isolation of Bacteria, Single Colony Isolation of Bacteria; https://www.sonoma/edu/users/c/cannon/240singlecolonyisolation.html retrieved on Oct. 31, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Gynecological Specimens-Conventional Pap Test, Rutland Regional Health Services; prepared by Joe Walker Jr.; Jun. 10, 2011; 6 pages. |
| Michael L. Noel, MD: Papanicolaou Smear Adequacy: The Cervical Cytobrush and Ayre Spatula Compared with the Extended-Tip Spatula; Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul.-Sep. 1989, 5 pages. |
| Wurmb-Schwardk, “Fast and Simply DNA Extraction from Saliva and Sperm Cells Obtained from the Skin or Isolated from Swabs”, Elsevier—Legal Medicine, Mar. 2006, 6 pages. |
| “Safety Data Sheet in Accordance with Regulation 453/2010”, Jun. 6, 2011, 6 pages. |
| Thomasma, “A39 Optimization of Touch DNA Collection Techniques Using Alternative Swabbing Solutions”, Proceedings American Academy of Forensic Sciences, XP055163017, Apr. 2010, pp. 40-41, 4 pages. |
| Thomasma, “The Influence of Swabbing Solutions on DNA Recovery from Touch Samples”, Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 58, No. 2, Mar. 2013, 6 pages. |
| EP1608268—Reply on behalf of Proprietor and Remarks on Requests and Original Disclosure—Dec. 10, 2012, 54 pages. |
| EP1608268—Short Brief by Patent Proprietor—Oct. 28, 2014, 3 pages. |
| EP1608268—Minutes of the Oral Proceedings—Jun. 10, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/899,394 dated Aug. 5, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf Order to Take Evidence, Copan Italia S.p.A. v. Puritan Medical Products Co., LLC at al., Apr. 7, 2016, 18 pages. |
| Sennan Patent and Trademark Office, Decision in the Declaratory Proceedings, Mar. 11, 2016, 37 pages. |
| Leemans et al., “Evaluation of Methodology for the Isolation and Analysis of LCN-DNA before and after Dactyloscopic Enhancement of Fingerprints”, Published in 2006, Elsevier, pp. 583-585. |
| Translation of Grounds of Appeal, German Application No. DE 20 2004 021 930, Dec. 7, 2015, 30 pages. |
| Translation of Opinion of the Submissions by the Appellant, German Application No. DE 20 2004 021 930, Jun. 18 and 29, 2015, 11 pages. |
| Translation of 4th Opinion of the Defendants, German Application No. DE 20 2004 021 930, Nov. 27, 2015, 7 pages. |
| German Federal Patent Court, Minutes concerning DE Utility Model 20 2004 021 930, Sep. 13, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Meissner Bolte, Munich, Rejoinder to Grounds of Appeal, DE Utility Model 20 2004 021 787.2, Oct. 4, 2016, 68 pages. |
| German Federal Patent Court, Decision in the appeal case concerning DE Utility Model 20 2004 021 930.1, Sep. 13, 2016, 56 pages. |
| Extract from Saechtling, Kunststoff Taschenbuch, 26th edition, MB-B7, published in 1995, pp. 148-149. |
| Extract from Pschyrembel Klinisches Worterbuch, 255th edition, MB-B10, Published in 1986, p. 1533. |
| Copan Flock Technologies SrL, Cytology—Cervical Collection, MB-B8, Copyright 2012, 2 pages. |
| 2008 Fredrick D. Simon Award, Presented to: Gilberto Dalmaso, PhD, “Qualification of High-Recovery, Flocked Swabs as Compared to Traditional Rayon Swabs for Microbiological Environmental Monitoring of Surfaces,” Published May/Jun. 2008, 1 pages. |
| Boyle et al., “Optimization of an in vitro assay to detect Streptococcus equi subs. equi,” Veterinary Microbiology, Oct. 12, 2012, 159(3-4):406-10. |
| Corina et al., “Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing,” Forensic Science International: Genetics, Feb. 1, 2010, 4(2):115-21. |
| Daley et al., “Comparison of Flocked and Rayon Swabs for Collection of Respiratory Epithelial Cells from Uninfected Volunteers and Symptomatic Patients,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jun. 2006, 44(6):2265-2267. |
| Ginocchio et al., “Current Best Practices for Respiratory Virus Testing,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Sep. 2011, 49(9 Supp):S44-S48. |
| Munywoki et al., “Improved Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Pediatric Outpatients with Acute Respiratory Illness by Real-Time PCR Using Nasopharyngeal Flocked Swabs,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Sep. 2011, 49(9):3365-3367. |
| No Author Listed, ASM's Interim Algorithm for Guidance in Testing of Patients with Respiratory Illness for Influenza A (including Novel H1N1), American Society for Microbiology, Sep. 2009, 1 page. |
| No Author Listed, “HydraFlock: The Superior Flocked Swab,” http://blog.puritanmedproducts.com/whyhydaflockissuperioiflockedswab, retrieved on Mar. 4, 2017, 3 pages. |
| Nugent et al., Evaluation of the Physical and Diagnostic Nature of Swabs, Department of Pathology, believed to be May 2007, M44, 1 page. |
| Saegeman, “Comparison of Eswab with dry swab and Amies swab in maintaining viability of microorganisms and comparison of Eswab with dry swab for Gram stain quality,” UZ Leuven, Laboratoriumgeneeskunde, May 19, 2010, 23 pages. |
| Bersev et al. “Elektrostatische Beflockung”, Leipzig, 1993, pp. 127-129 (incl. translation). |
| Bersev et al., “Tables 5-8,” Elektrostatische Beflockung, Leipzig, 1993, 3 pages (incl. translation). |
| Magg, “Principles of Flocking,” Adhesives Age, Sep. 1975, vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 23-28. |
| Textile Science and Technology: Absorbent Technology, Chatterjee & Gupta (ed)., 2002, 484 pages. |
| Copan Italia S.P.A et al. v. Puritan Medical Products Company LLC et al., “Claim Construction Order”, Case [1:18-cv-00218-JDL], U.S. Pat. No. 8,114,027, dated Nov. 4, 2019, 31 pages. |
| Hofmann et al., Adolescent Medicine, vol. 39, 1989, 2 pages (abstract only). |
| Samanta et al., “Hydrophobic Functionalization of Cellulosic Substrates Using Atmospheric Pressure Plasma” Cellulose Chemistry And Technology 50.7-8, Jul. 1, 2016, 10 pages. |
| Du et al. “Preparation of hydrophobic nylon fabric.” Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 11.1, Mar. 11, 2016: 155892501601100106, 7 pages. |
| Samu et al., “Effect of charge and hydrophobicity on adsorption of modified starches on polyester” Journal of colloid and interface science 220.2, Dec. 15, 1999, 2 pages. |
| Blog.puritanmedproducts.com [online], “Which is the Best Type of Swab to Use when Diagnosing the Flu” Nov. 20, 2015, [retrieved on Aug. 27, 2020], retrieved from: URL <https://blog.puritanmedproducts.com/which-is-the-best-type-of-swab-to-use-when-dia>, 3 pages. |
| FDA.gov [online], “FAQs on Testing for SARS-CoV-2” Jul. 2020, [retrieved on Aug. 26, 2020], retrieved from: URL <https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-devices/faqs>, 103 pages. |
| It.usembassy.gov [online], “COVID 19 Emergency: Ambassador Eisenberg Praises Efforts by Italian Companies” Mar. 19, 2020, [retrieved on Aug. 25, 2020], retrieved from: URL <https://it.usembassy.gov/covid-19-emergency-ambassador-eisenberg-praises-efforts-b>, 1 page. |
| Nytimes.com [online], “White House Enlist Military to Import Swabs for Coronavirus Tests” Mar. 20, 2020, [retrieved on Aug. 25, 2020], retrieved from: URL <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/20/US/politics/swabs-for-coronavirus-testing.html>, 5 pages. |
| The City of Columbus Public Health, “Interim Recommendations for Collecting Clinical Specimens from Persons for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (covid-19)”, Columbus Public Health, Jun. 24, 2020, 2 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130072817 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12903921 | Oct 2010 | US |
| Child | 13657949 | US | |
| Parent | 10543873 | US | |
| Child | 12903921 | US |
