The present invention relates to an improvement in machinery used in the assembly of metal couplings to flexible hoses and comparable applications. Such machines are commonly called “crimp presses” in some fields and in others, they are called “swage presses”. In this specification such machines are referred to as “swage presses” but it is to be understood that such terminology includes “crimp presses” and any comparable machinery.
In recent years the connection of metal couplings has been achieved by reducing the diameter of a metal sleeve (ferrule) over the end of a hose which has been pushed onto a coupling tail. This is achieved with the metal in a “cold state” which has meant, along with the ability to maintain continuity in the case of hydraulic transmission hoses at extreme pressures, that high radial loads are required, to effect the required deformation of the metal sleeve (ferrule).
Also, as the ferrule, hose and tail assembly are produced with various densities or structures along their axial length and the subsequent compression of the total assembly has meant the final “swage” was not cylindrical but tapered. This has required that the machinery not only be strong but also extremely rigid.
There are various designs of swage presses able to achieve this function. All employ some method of “wedging” one component against another to bring typically eight elements (shoes) radially in from one diametrical arrangement to another. By far the most popular and the most economical to manufacture swage press has been the “cone/shoe” type arrangement. A view of such a swage press machine part is depicted in
In
As can be seen in
A weakness in this design is that if say the operating piston produces 100 tonne of force, then the front plate or flange must be able to withstand the same amount of reactive force. The quality of the swaging process and the ultimate performance and rigidity of the machine is due largely to the design and ultimate performance of the front plate or flange. As bolts are commonly used to retain the front plate or flange onto the housing, these bolts must also provide a reactive moment as well as the reactive axial force to resolve the out of alignment force of the shoe elements.
Using too many retaining bolts produces a weakness in the front plate or flange as the flange will flex more if there are more retaining bolt holes. The amount of bolt holes acts as a “perforation” and causes a weakness in an area where the highest moment forces exist. In reality, the minimum amount of bolts are used to achieve a 2:1 safety margin in order to achieve the stiffest possible front plate or flange, the least amount of flex and ultimately the highest performance and quality swage possible.
One further serious flaw with existing designs such as those shown in
The objective of the present invention is to provide improvements in a swage press construction that will provide a greater safety margin in use and a more rigid arrangement that will improve performance of the press.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a head assembly for a swage press including a housing having a peripheral side wall, a front wall integrally formed with said peripheral side wall with an opening in said front wall providing access to a press zone arranged within said peripheral side wall, said housing having an open rear face; a rear wall secured by fastening means to said peripheral side wall to at least partially close said rear face of the housing, and a hydraulically operated press mechanism located within said housing at least partially surrounding said press zone.
In accordance with a further aspect, the present invention also provides a head assembly for a swage press, the head assembly including:
Preferred features of the invention may be as defined in claims 3 to 7 annexed hereto, the subject matter of these claims are hereby incorporated in the disclosure of this specification by this reference thereto.
The present invention achieves the aforementioned objectives by providing an arrangement where the front wall and the peripheral side wall are formed integrally or in one piece thereby providing a far stiffer and stronger front wall. Thus the front wall is less likely to flex under heavy load improving the swaging performance of the press and forward directed catastrophic failure of the assembly is unlikely to occur or the prospect of same is greatly lessened.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention will hereinafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, it being recognized that
Referring first to
As can be seen from
The resultant axial load that was retained by a separate front wall flange which was in turn restrained by separate bolts is now restrained by one component able to withstand more effectively the moment forces created by the non-aligned restraining forces created by the shoes.
The end cap 45 is preferably press fitted into one portion of the housing 40 at or adjacent the rear face 42 and is attached via two wires 46 inserted from either end of the housing after the end cap 40 has been inserted, the wires 46 being pressed into passages 47 formed by grooves in the end cap outer wall surface and the inner wall surface of the side wall 43. In this case, the rotational moment created by the hydraulic pressure which may be 100 tonne is more evenly dispersed around the entire area of the front wall flange 44 instead of the inner lip of the separate front wall as depicted in the prior art arrangement shown in
As the end cap 45 is press fitted into the housing, this portion of the housing acts more effectively in providing a restraining moment force than bolts. The amount of “flex” per unit tonne is much less than with an end cap 45 attached via bolts, however, it should be recognized that in the arrangement shown in
The main benefits of the arrangement disclosed in
The overall construction is far stiffer with less flex in the restraining front wall flange. The amount of “flex” determines how “stiff” the arrangement is and this in turn determines the quality of the swage (crimp) and the arrangements ability to swage (crimp) parallel even with “irregular” product. The front wall flange can also be made with a thinner section thus providing greater access for components to be swagged (crimped). The arrangement is much safer with higher safety margins and no possibility of bolts breaking away and harming an operator. Although the end cap 45 is now a separate component, there is slightly higher flex than before in this region but this extra deflection has no detrimental effect on machine operation or performance. Moreover, if an ultimate failure does occur due to incorrect servicing or assembly this will occur at the rear, away from the operator.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004900774 | Feb 2004 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2005/000194 | 2/16/2005 | WO | 00 | 7/2/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/077566 | 8/25/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4014202 | Van Allen et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4107964 | Smith | Aug 1978 | A |
4306442 | Schrock | Dec 1981 | A |
4873755 | Johnston | Oct 1989 | A |
5440971 | Yuda | Aug 1995 | A |
6510722 | Ching et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 162 012 | Dec 2001 | EP |
WO 0121337 | Mar 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070271989 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |