The field of this invention is packers that seal downhole annular spaces using a swelling action and more particularly where the seal is enhanced by interacting swelling components.
Packers have been in use downhole to separate zones in a wellbore. Many styles of such packers have been used. Some mechanically compress a sealing element when the packer mandrel is properly positioned. The compression can be initiated with hydraulic pressure that is applied in the wellbore or the compression force can be initiated by taking advantage of available hydrostatic pressure that is allowed to act on a piston against a lower pressure chamber in the packer body. Some packers are inflatables that are actuated when properly positioned by applied pressure through a valving system leading to an annular space under the inflatable element. In general, these inflatables have a stationary end and a sliding collar at the opposite end of the element that rides up the mandrel as the element is inflated.
Other packers feature a sleeve of a material that swells that is mounted over a mandrel and covered by a protective material. The rationale is that the sleeve swells in contact with well fluids such as water or hydrocarbons. The outer cover is removable downhole so as to allow a predetermined time to deliver the packer to the desired position before the onset of swelling. Swelling that starts at a premature time could make it impossible to deliver the packer to the desired location or could result in sufficient damage to the sleeve during delivery that the resulting seal will either not occur or will fail under fairly low differential pressures. Some examples of prior art showing a swelling element with a delay feature to the swelling to allow delivery are: US 2004/0055760 A1; US 2004/0194971 A1; US 2004/0118572 A1; U.S. Pat. No. 4,862,967; U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,522; US 2004/0020662 A1; U.S. Pat. No. 3,918,523 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,612,985. Other designs involved putting a swelling material inside an inflatable element and some examples of such a design are: US 2005/0110217 A1; U.S. Pat. No. 6,073,692; U.S. Pat. No. 6,834,725; U.S. Pat. No. 5,048,605; U.S. Pat. No. 5,195,583 and Japan Application 07-334115. Some designs simply use an exposed element that begins to swell upon insertion with the idea that the swelling will progress slowly enough to allow enough time for the delivery to the desired location downhole. Some examples are: U.S. Pat. No. 6,848,505; PCT Application WO 2004/018836 A1; U.S. Pat. No. 4,137,970; US Application US 2004/0261990; Japan Application 03-166,459; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,919,989 and 4,936,386; US Application US 2005/009363 A1; U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,522 and US Application US 2005/0067170 A1. Yet other design combine the swelling effect with swaging wherein the swelling member is held by a mechanical retainer for delivery and upon reaching the proper depth the expansion breaks the retainer or otherwise defeats it so that swelling can take place. This concept and many others focused on swaging to trigger packer setting are illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,522 B2.
What are needed and not found in the above mentioned prior art are techniques that enhance the seal obtainable from a swelling material using the configuration of the sealing element working in conjunction with the swelling principle employed. Furthermore the invention provides not only an enhanced seal from component interaction but the design of the individual components themselves also promote longevity of the seal by better encapsulating the swelling material and using the encapsulating material for ultimate contact with a surrounding tubular or borehole for an improved seal. These and other advantages of the present invention will be more readily understood by those skilled in the art from the discussion of the preferred embodiment, the drawings and the claims, which determine the scope of the invention.
A packer for downhole use features interacting elements of swelling material. Preferably the elements are in contact for relative movement from an initial diameter for run in. As the elements swell, they move with respect to each other to enlarge the diameter of the assembly so that a sealing contact is made. Each element exerts a residual force on the adjacent element to enhance the seal. Each element is preferably coated with a material that allows well fluids to reach the swelling material and then later to stiffen and become impervious from exposure to such fluids. The assembly can be covered for run in to delay the onset of expansion until the target depth is reached for the packer to be set. The elements can be pivotally mounted to a mandrel where swelling initiates pivoting and sealing action.
The packer of the preferred embodiment is shown in
The petals 12 can preferably have an individual covering 14 that is preferably a resin coated initially porous bag. The bag initially lets well fluid though to the petal 12 to initiate its swelling process. The well fluids can be hydrocarbons, water or combinations thereof or other materials already in the wellbore or subsequently added to the wellbore after the mandrel 10 is placed in the desired location. Exposure to the particular fluid that made the petal 12 swell will eventually cure a resin material 16 that coats the bag 14. Alternatively, resin material 16 can be within the petal 12 and can set up as a given petal swells to increase the integrity of the ultimate seal. Alternatively the petal 12 can simply be coated with a resin or other material 16 that initially allows fluid to pass and with time and exposure to a fluid downhole cures or sets up or otherwise gets firm. In this manner there is no bag 14. The petals 12 can be made from an expandable material; examples of which are, a super absorbing polymer (SAP), gas producing water reactive materials, epoxy foams, etc. Possible hardenable materials include: Portland cement, water-hardenable urethane, alkyd, diisocyanate, etc. This material winds up being encased in bags 14 that desirably become impervious and more rigid so that they can seal against the borehole or surrounding tubular more effectively. The petals can be made of a variety of materials known to swell and the material selection can be tailored to the fluids expected in the well or those on hand to be introduced later. While multiple petals are contemplated, the invention further comprises other no-petal arrangements of a material that swells and hardens to form a downhole seal.
The petals can also be mechanically reinforced to increase the pressure holding capacity, as illustrated in
In operation the cover disappears after the assembly has been placed at the desired location. The wings 34 can make contact with the wellbore for sealing as acted upon by the elements 40. Depending on the configuration the elements 40 can make the seal on the wellbore wall reinforced by the wings 34 attached to them. Alternatively, a combination of contacting wings 34 or elements 40 doing the sealing is envisioned. The swellable material that is surrounded by a bag and defines an element 40 can also permeate the surrounding bag to help make it impervious by filling voids therein. The surrounding bag material can also harden and become more rigid to strengthen the overall performance of the assembly. A water activated urethane material on the bag can help the element 40 become harder to add sealing strength to the assembly.
Additionally, and optionally, an outer sheath 18 can be placed all around the coated bags 14 or individually around each or some of the bags 14. Doing this delays the access of the triggering fluid to the expandable material that preferably comprises the petals 12 until the assembly is properly located in the well. The sheath can be made of a material that dissolves over time in the well fluids or in other ways fails or goes away over time or with an applied force, such as expansion from within the mandrel with a swage, for example. Alternatively, there can be an outermost layer that delays the swelling action of the petals 12 that goes away by a variety of mechanisms, as stated above and just inside of it can be a porous flexible housing 20 that simply retains the petals 12 in an adjacent relationship as they swell. In this arrangement shown in
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/647,816, filed on Jan. 31, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2814947 | Stegemeier et al. | Dec 1957 | A |
3385367 | Kollsman | May 1968 | A |
3918523 | Stuber | Nov 1975 | A |
4137970 | Laflin et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4524982 | Hertz, Jr. | Jun 1985 | A |
4612985 | Rubbo et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4862967 | Harris | Sep 1989 | A |
4919989 | Colangelo | Apr 1990 | A |
4936386 | Colangelo | Jun 1990 | A |
5048605 | Toon et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5195583 | Toon et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
6073692 | Wood et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6581682 | Parent et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6834725 | Whanger et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6848505 | Richard et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854522 | Brezinski et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20040020662 | Freyer | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055760 | Nguyen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040118572 | Whanger et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040194971 | Thomson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040261990 | Bosma et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050067170 | Richard | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050092363 | Richard et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110217 | Wood et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171248 | Li et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
04363499 | Dec 1992 | JP |
09151686 | Jun 1997 | JP |
WO 2004018836 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060272806 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60647816 | Jan 2005 | US |