The present disclosure relates to embodiments of swim goggles.
Swim goggles used to isolate a swimmer's eyes from the surrounding water are well known. Conventional swim goggles typically include a pair of spaced-apart eyepieces that are worn over the eyes, a nose band that extends over the nose, and an elastic strap that extends around the rear of the head. Such goggles typically surround the orbit (eye socket) to protect the eye and improve underwater vision by providing a corneal/air interface instead of exposing the cornea directly to an aqueous environment.
Two primary design considerations that drive the design of swim goggles are minimizing hydrodynamic drag and minimizing visual distortion. Hydrodynamic drag creates resistance to the swimmer's forward movement through the water, thereby reducing the swimmer's velocity through the water. Therefore, in order to maximize their velocity when racing or otherwise moving through the water, swimmers need to reduce water resistance or hydrodynamic drag as much as possible. Reducing hydrodynamic drag is of particular importance in sprinting events, such as the 100-meter freestyle, where time differences between swimmers are frequently measured in fractions of a second.
Cylindrical goggles employing planar lenses positioned perpendicular to the normal line of sight can provide relatively distortion free vision, but such goggles unfortunately exhibit high resistance to water flow past the lenses. To reduce hydrodynamic drag, it is known to increase the curvature of the lenses so that water can flow more easily over the lenses with less resistance. Unfortunately, such lenses tend to distort an image transmitted to the eye, and many users are unwilling to sacrifice visual clarity for reduced drag.
Accordingly, there is a continuing need for new and improved swim goggles, and especially for goggles that minimize hydrodynamic drag and/or minimize visual distortion.
According to one aspect, the present disclosure provides a set of strapless swim goggles that includes a pair of eyepieces that isolate the swimmer's eyes from the outside environment. Unlike conventional swim goggles, the eyepieces are not interconnected with each other by a head strap or a nose piece. Instead of a strap, the eyepieces desirably are retained against the swimmer's face using an adhesive applied to the eyepieces. The adhesive can be, for example, a layer of an adhesive tape. In an alternative embodiment, the goggles are not interconnected by a head strap, but may have a nose piece connected to the nasal end portions of the eyepieces.
In particular embodiments, each eyepiece includes a transparent, non-corrective lens portion that covers an eye and a peripheral frame portion that is shaped to at least partially conform to the shape of the orbital rim, for example, by seating against or adjacent (for example, slightly within) the orbital rim. The frame portion of each eyepiece has a posterior surface that in some embodiments carries a layer of an adhesive tape for securing the frame portion to the skin adjacent the eye. In addition, the frame portions desirably are sized and shaped to allow a swimmer to retain the eyepieces in place by contracting the orbicularis oculi muscles (the muscles surrounding the eye sockets) against the frame portions.
A significant advantage of one embodiment of the goggles is that it reduces hydrodynamic drag as the swimmer moves through the water. This embodiment of the goggles reduces hydrodynamic drag in at least two ways. First, the hydrodynamic drag caused by the presence of a strap and a nose piece in conventional goggles is completely eliminated. Second, the frame portions of the eyepieces surrounding the lenses do not include any connection points for connecting to a strap or nose piece. As such, the frame portions can be formed with a smooth, continuous surface, which allows water to pass over the goggles more efficiently. The goggles are particularly advantageous in sprinting events (e.g., the 100-meter freestyle), where a relatively small reduction in overall drag can result in a significantly faster performance for a swimmer.
According to another aspect, hydrodynamic drag can be further reduced by minimizing the anterior-posterior depth or profile of eyepieces so that water can flow more easily and quickly from the forehead over the eyes as the swimmer moves through the water. Also, by minimizing the depth of the eyepieces, the lenses are moved closer to the eyes, which improves peripheral vision by increasing the horizontal and vertical viewing angles of the eyepieces. In particular embodiments, the eyepieces have a minimum depth of less than 8 mm, with 5.75 mm being a specific example.
According to another aspect, the lens of each eyepiece includes a substantially flat, anterior lens portion that is positioned in front of the eye in an as worn orientation and a substantially flat side lens portion that is connected to the temporal edge of the anterior lens portion. In particular embodiments, the anterior lens is substantially perpendicular to the normal straight ahead line of sight, while the side lens portion is substantially perpendicular to a secondary temporally oriented line of sight. The side lens portion being inclined away from the anterior lens portion reduces hydrodynamic drag. This embodiment can include a conventional nose piece and head strap to retain the goggles in the as worn position over the eyes, although other embodiments are strapless eyepieces that are retained by the orbicularis oculi muscles and/or adhesive as already described.
The angled side lens portion is also effective to enhance the optical properties of the lens. For example, since the side lens portion reduces the distance between the eye and the lens in the temporal field of vision, it increases the horizontal viewing angle through the temporal portion of the lens. In addition, the inclined side lens portion mitigates the effect of prismatic deviation caused by the refraction of light through the temporal portion of the lens as compared to an eyepiece having only a flat anterior lens. The inclined side lens portion also eliminates the power and distortion induced by the curved annular peripheral wall that would otherwise be at that location of the eyepiece. Hence, the orientation of the side lens portion improves the overall optical clarity of the lens.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of several embodiments, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” refer to one or more than one, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
As used herein, the term “includes” means “comprises.”
As used herein, the term “line of sight” is used generically to refer to the visual fixation axis that extends through the center of the pupil and the center of rotation of the eye. A “normal line of sight” is the straight ahead line of sight or sight along the visual axis that the eye assumes in the primary position, looking straight ahead into the distance. A “temporal line of sight” is a secondary line of sight that the eye assumes when rotated temporally (toward the temple).
The lens portions 16 of the eyepieces 12, 14 can have any of various configurations. In the illustrated embodiment, for example, each lens portion 16 includes a flat anterior lens portion 20 and a flat, temporally inclined side lens portion 22 that intersects the anterior lens portion 20 at an obtuse angle α (
Other lens configurations also can be implemented in the goggles. For example, inclined side lens portion 22 can be oriented in a non-temporal direction with respect to anterior lens portion 20, such as substantially in one of the other cardinal directions (superior, superior-temporal, superior-nasal, nasal, inferior, inferior-temporal, and inferior-nasal) or in a direction intermediate two of the cardinal directions. Additionally, multiple flat, inclined lens portions can be connected to the anterior lens portion 20 at respective locations. Alternatively, each lens portion 16 can be formed with a flat anterior lens portion 20, a curved peripheral wall 24, but without an inclined lens portion (e.g., side lens portion 22).
As another example, each lens portion can be formed with a curved, convex anterior surface, rather than the flat anterior lens surface shown in the illustrated embodiment. In addition, the lens portions 16 can have various tints or coatings (e.g., an anti-reflection coating), as known in the art.
The eyepieces 12, 14 are configured to form a substantially water-tight seal with the face of a wearer in order to keep water away from the wearer's eyes. Additionally, the frame portions 18 of the eyepieces 12, 14 desirably are configured to enable the wearer to assist in retaining the eyepieces against the face through contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscles 40 (
For example, referring to
In an alternative embodiment, the frame portions 18 can be sized and shaped to fit substantially or entirely within the orbital rims. In another alternative embodiment, the frame portions 18 can be sized and shaped to reside completely outside the orbital rims.
Dimensions of the frame that can be retained by the orbicularis oculi muscles may be determined using many different approaches. For example, the goggles can be custom designed and fitted to a particular individual. Alternatively, the dimensions can be determined by reference to a standard head form that has been designed according to statistical norms from the population, or from published texts and descriptions of such norms. Examples of such head forms are the Canadian and Alderson head forms.
In the illustrated embodiment, each eyepiece 12, 14 has a one-piece or unitary construction, although this is not a requirement. In an alternative embodiment, for example, the lens portions 16 and the frame portions 18 are separately formed and then subsequently joined together to form the eyepieces. The lens portions 16 can be either permanently attached to the frame portions 18 or connected to the frame portions in a removable manner. In this alternative embodiment, the frame portions 18 need not be constructed from the same material as the lens portions 16.
Each eyepiece 12, 14 in the illustrated embodiment provides a substantially zero power or non-corrective lens. However, if desired, anterior lens 20 and/or side lens 22 of lens portion 16 can be corrective lenses having optical power to compensate for the refractive error of the wearer. Such corrective lenses can have a planar anterior surface and a slightly curved posterior surface to introduce optical power in the lens. In another embodiment, a separate corrective lens can be shaped and sized to be received in the eyepiece against the posterior surface of the anterior lens 20.
To assist in retaining the eyepieces 12, 14 against the face of the user, each eyepiece can optionally have an adhesive layer, such as the illustrated adhesive tape layer 28 (
The second adhesive surface 32 desirably exhibits a bonding strength suitable to adhere the eyepieces 12, 14 to the skin of the user during normal conditions of use (e.g., when swimming), yet allows the eyepieces to be removed with minimal discomfort. The first adhesive surface 30 of the tape desirably provides a bonding strength sufficient to prevent separation of the tape from the eyepieces during normal conditions of use, yet allows the tape to be peeled away from the posterior surfaces 26 of the eyepieces to permit replacement of the tape when the adhesion strength of the second adhesive surface deteriorates from multiple uses and the tape no longer adheres to the skin. In addition, the tape desirably includes a layer of a deformable material, such as polyethylene foam, to provide a sealing surface that better accommodates uneven facial surfaces. One example of a replaceable adhesive tape that can be used to form adhesive tape layers 28 is Bioflex™ Rx416VSA double-sided mounting tape, available from Scapa North America of Windsor, Conn.
In lieu of the illustrated tape layers 28, a layer of a suitable adhesive (e.g., acrylic) can be formed directly on the posterior surfaces 26 of the eyepieces. This alternative embodiment may require a new layer of adhesive to be applied to the eyepieces after multiple uses to ensure a suitable bond against the skin. In yet another embodiment, the eyepieces are not provided with any adhesive layers to assist in retaining the eyepieces in place against the user's face.
Referring to
When mounting the goggles, the user first opens his or her eyes wide so as to expand the orbicularis oculi muscles, positions the eyepieces 12, 14 over the eyes as previously described, and presses the eyepieces against the face so as to ensure a good bond between the tape layer 28 and the skin. Pressing the eyepieces against the face tends to create a small vacuum between the eyes and the eyepieces. This vacuum assists in retaining the eyepieces against the face during use. When the eyepieces are properly positioned, the orbicularis oculi muscles can be relaxed or further contracted against the upper and lower edges of the frame portions 18 to assist in comfortably retaining the eyepieces in place.
In use, a swimmer can expand or contract the orbicularis oculi muscles as needed to adjust the firmness with which the eyepieces are retained by these muscles. For example, when diving into a pool at the start of a race, the swimmer can contract the orbicularis oculi muscles tightly against the frame portions 18 to ensure that the eyepieces do not come off upon entry into the water.
By eliminating the strap and nose piece for interconnecting the eyepieces, such as used in conventional goggles, and by minimizing the depths of the eyepieces, the goggles 10 reduce the overall hydrodynamic drag of a swimmer. The goggles 10 are particularly advantageous in sprinting events, where a relatively small reduction in overall drag can result in a significant reduction in overall time for a swimmer.
In one specific embodiment of the goggles 10, each eyepiece 12, 14 has a minimum depth Dm of about 5.75 mm, an overall length L (
This example demonstrates the hydrodynamic drag of a pair of strapless goggles having the same configuration as the embodiment shown in
To determine hydrodynamic drag, each pair of goggles was placed on the head of a life-size mannequin positioned in a tow tank. The mannequin was positioned face down with the arms extended and pointed forward. Drag measurements for each pair of goggles were recorded at water velocities of 1.950 m/s, 2.025 m/s, 2.1 m/s, 2.175 m/s and 2.250 m/s. The recorded drag measurements were normalized through conversion to non-dimensional drag coefficients. Statistical regression was used to convert the drag coefficients to estimated drag at a velocity of 2.10 m/s.
The results of this evaluation are summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the strapless goggles actually reduced the overall drag of the bare mannequin by about 0.073 kg. This reduction is a consequence of the eyepieces fairing the eye sockets of the mannequin. The difference in drag between the strapless goggles and goggles A is 0.339 kg, and the difference in drag between the strapless goggles and goggles B is 0.481 kg. In the 100-m freestyle, the differences in drag would result in about a 0.678-second advantage over goggles A and about a 0.962-second advantage over goggles B.
As shown in
A typical conventional eyepiece having the lens configuration shown in
Assuming the surfaces of the lens are flat and parallel, the relationship between the incident light ray in water and the refracted light ray in air can be calculated using Snell's Law:
nair·sin θair=nwater·sinwater
where nair and nwater are the indices of refraction of air and water, respectively, θwater is the angle of incidence, and θair is the angle of refraction. This equation can be used to calculate either the angle of refraction in water as a function of the angle of incidence or the viewing angle in water (θwater) as a function of the initial line of sight in air (θair). The angular deviation can be expressed in prism diopters (pd), which can be calculated according to the equation:
pd=100·tan(θair−θwater)
Combining the above equations, the prismatic deviation (expressed in pd) can be calculated for any initial line of sight in air.
Table 2 shows the angle of refraction and prismatic deviation calculated for various angles of incidence. Table 2 illustrates that there is no prismatic deviation if an image is viewed along a direction of gaze, or line of sight, that is perpendicular to the lens surface (i.e., θair=0), and the amount of prismatic deviation increases as the angle between the line of sight in air (θair) and a normal to the lens surface increases. For example,
The angled side lens 22 functions to mitigate the effect of prismatic deviation as the line of sight rotates relative to the eyepiece in the temporal direction. More specifically, and referring to
Further, as shown in
The angle α at which the line of sight L3 is perpendicular to side lens 22 can vary depending on the overall depth or other dimensions of the eyepiece. In particular embodiments, the angle α is approximately 124° to 164°, although the angle could be less than 124° or greater than 164°. In a specific implementation, an eyepiece having the dimensions provided above in Example 1 includes a side lens 22 oriented at an angle α of approximately 142° to 146°, and more particularly 144°. For an eyepiece having the same overall dimensions but a greater depth, the angle α is increased so that the respective line of sight L3 that intersects the midpoint M of the side lens extends at a 90° angle with respect to the lens. Conversely, for an eyepiece having the same overall dimension but a smaller depth, the angle α is decreased to provide a respective line of sight L3 that intersects the midpoint M at a 90° angle.
Other approaches can be used to determine an optimum angle α. For example, if the goggles are to be used for activities in which the eyes are substantially fixed relative to the head and the goggles, the angle α can be selected such that a peripheral reflected ray extending through the nodal point of the eye intersects the midpoint M at a 90° angle.
As discussed above, one or more inclined lenses can be connected to other locations on the anterior lens 20. For example, one or more lenses can be connected to the anterior lens and inclined away from the anterior lens in one of the other cardinal directions (superior, superior-temporal, superior-nasal, nasal, inferior, inferior-temporal, and inferior-nasal) or in a direction intermediate two of the cardinal directions. The enhanced optical characteristics of side lens 22 are also realized by other inclined lens connected to other locations on the anterior lens. For example, an inferiorly inclined lens connected to an inferior edge of the anterior lens 20 reduces prismatic deviation and distortion through the inferior portion of the lens portion 16. In addition, the methods described above for determining the optimum angle α for side lens 22 also apply for determining the optimum angle for other inclined lenses connected to the anterior lens.
The present invention has been shown in the described embodiments for illustrative purposes only. The present invention may be subject to many modifications and changes without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. We therefore claim as our invention all such modifications as come within the spirit and scope of the following claims.