The present invention relates to the installation of an elevator door hatchway, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for installing the parts of an elevator door hatchway.
The Related Art
Elevator installation normally includes the setting up of the carriage (which is the elevator car), the elevator shaft, the rails and the door hatchway opening. Normally, the hatchway opening installation process is performed by using what is commonly referred to in the industry as a “running platform.” This is the carriage without the decorative cab portion. In order to install the components of the hatchway opening, the workmen must be inside the shaft area by standing within the previously installed running platform. The steel square along with the door buck, which is the frame outside of the hatchway entrance, is hoisted inside the shaft area only when the carriage is at the same level with the door opening. Without the carriage, workmen installing the hatchway opening would have to attempt to work within an open shaft way at great peril.
The use of the carriage causes a delay in the total elevator installation process because the “running platform” must be “borrowed” from the remainder of the job. Workmen, from other parts of the elevator construction job site, who would need the same running platform for other installation processes, i.e. shaft work, cab decoration etc., normally pause for two week periods, if not more, for each door hatchway installation while the hatchway opening work is completed. A typical high-rise building can have 400 to 800 openings for which the delays in the installation procedure result in extra construction costs and longer total building completion times.
It is an object of the invention to overcome the foregoing and other disadvantages of the prior art by providing a method and apparatus for installing the parts of the elevator door hatchway without the necessity of the use of a running platform (carriage). This is considerably faster, more efficient and, most importantly, a safer process for the workmen. The workmen can complete the installation process at the open shaft way, without entering the shaft way itself and without the use of the running platform (carriage).
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference may be made to the following description of exemplary embodiments thereof, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, as shown in
In one exemplary embodiment, a weight support may also be used. The weight support may be in the form of a safety weight wheel 9. It may also be a suspensory cable.
A safety weight wheel 9, one exemplary embodiment of which is shown in
One exemplary embodiment of the swing lock hinge 7 is shown in
One embodiment of the safety weight wheel 9 is shown in
Once the swing lock hinge 7 is attached to the shaft way brackets 8, the steel square with the attached door buck 5 and doors 6 is then swung into the frame of the open shaft way with the use of the safety weight wheel 9, and then bolted in place. The safety weight wheel 9 and swing lock hinge 7 are then removed to be re-used on future openings. Workmen do not have to enter the shaft way, nor is there the risk of dropping the door buck down the shaft.
The time for mounting the steel square to the door buck and doors, and attaching same to the shaft way brackets with this system, can take approximately two hours as opposed to the usual two week period (which includes down time resulting from waiting to schedule the use of the running platform). The above-described embodiments are intended to be only exemplary and are susceptible to variations and modifications that are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority based on U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled “SWING LOCK MECHANISM,” Ser. No. 60/590,592, which was filed on Jul. 23, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3654734 | Lehman | Apr 1972 | A |
4153234 | Sherwood et al. | May 1979 | A |
4299058 | Spaulding | Nov 1981 | A |
4420905 | Kucharczyk | Dec 1983 | A |
4949772 | Ballyns et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5515876 | Warner et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519920 | Runge et al. | May 1996 | A |
5673770 | Friedman | Oct 1997 | A |
5887681 | Bondavalli | Mar 1999 | A |
6202798 | Friedman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223661 | Griepentrog | May 2001 | B1 |
6286692 | Hemping | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6511120 | Mitts | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6659514 | Bass | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684570 | Robledo | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6715182 | Cheng | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6997504 | Lang et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7021005 | Curry | Apr 2006 | B1 |
20020095971 | Pawson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112320 | Hayashi | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030070768 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060175145 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60590592 | Jul 2004 | US |