This application is the US National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2010/051667, filed Feb. 11, 2010 and claims the benefit thereof. The International Application claims the benefits of European application No. 09005066.7 filed Apr. 6, 2009. All of the applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety
The invention relates to a swirler, particularly of a gas turbine, and improvements for the further diminishment of air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx).
In a gas turbine burner a fuel is burned to produce hot pressurised exhaust gases which are then fed to a turbine stage where they, while expanding and cooling, transfer momentum to turbine blades thereby imposing a rotational movement on a turbine rotor. Mechanical power of the turbine rotor can then be used to drive a generator for producing electrical power or to drive a machine. However, burning the fuel leads to a number of undesired pollutants in the exhaust gas which can cause damage to the environment. Therefore, it takes considerable effort to keep the pollutants as low as possible. One kind of pollutant is nitrogen oxide (NOx). The rate of formation of nitrogen oxide depends exponentially on the temperature of the combustion flame. It is therefore attempted to reduce the temperature over the combustion flame in order to keep the formation of nitrogen oxide as low as possible.
There are two main measures by which reduction of the temperature of the combustion flame is achievable. The first is to use a lean stoichiometry with a fine distribution of fuel in the air, generating a fuel/air mixture with a low fuel fraction. The relatively small fraction of fuel leads to a combustion flame with a low temperature. The second measure is to provide a thorough mixing of fuel and air before the combustion takes place. The better the mixing, the more uniformly distributed the fuel is in the combustion zone and the fewer regions exist where the fuel concentration is significantly higher than average. This helps to prevent hotspots in the combustion zone which would arise from local maxima in the fuel/air mixing ratio. With a high local fuel/air concentration the temperature will rise in that local area and so does as a result also the NOx in the exhaust.
Modern gas turbine engines therefore use the concept of premixing air and fuel in lean stoichiometry before the combustion of the fuel/air mixture. Usually the pre-mixing takes place by injecting fuel into an air stream in a swirling zone of a combustor which is located upstream from the combustion zone. The swirling leads to a mixing of fuel and air before the mixture enters the combustion zone.
GB 2334087 A is addressing the specific problem to improve the fuel to air ratio during start-up of a “lean burn” combustor. A combustor comprises a swirler with at least one restrictor to restrict the flow of fluid through the combustor. Preferably the restrictor may be biased or switched between restricting and non-restricting positions depending on the pressure of the airflow. This may optimise the fuel/air mixture. On the other hand the restrictors may cause dead zones in which the airflow is unstable and stagnant with a possibility that flashbacks may occur.
From U.S. Pat. No. 6,192,669 B1 it is known to arrange a plurality of burners, operatively connected to each other, in such a way, so that a swirl flow is initiated in a common combustion chamber which ensures the stability of the flame front. This is advantageous because this may to low pollutant emissions, e.g. NOx, at part load.
US patent application US 2006/0257807 A1 discloses a combustor with a swirler. Circular mixing ducts may be applied to a radial type swirler. This is advantageous due to the absence of corners where excessive fuel could get trapped.
With respect to the mentioned state of the art it is an object of the invention to provide a swirler, in particular a swirler in a gas turbine combustion chamber, a combustion chamber equipped with such a swirler, and a gas turbine having a plurality of such combustion chambers, so that mixing fuel and air in a swirling area is improved by providing a homogenous fuel/air mixture, especially at all possible loads of the gas turbine.
This objective is achieved by the independent claims. The dependent claims describe advantageous developments and modifications of the invention.
In accordance with the invention there is provided a swirler for mixing fuel and air comprising a plurality of vanes positioned radially around a central axis of the swirler and comprising a plurality of mixing channels for mixing fuel and air. At least one mixing channel of the plurality of mixing channels is defined by opposite walls of two adjacent vanes of the plurality of vanes. The at least one of the plurality of mixing channels is comprising at least one fuel injection opening arranged at an upstream sections of the at least one mixing channel and is comprising an axial swirler arranged at a downstream section of the at least one mixing channel.
Furthermore the invention is also directed at components comprising such a swirler, particularly a combustion chamber of a gas turbine. Furthermore the invention is also directed to a gas turbine comprising at last one of such a combustion chamber.
The inventive swirler is advantageous because the axial swirler provides an extra swirl, so that the fuel to air mixture is more homogenous.
Advantageously, the plurality of swirler airfoils may be arranged to provide a mixing channel individual rotating airflow for the at least one of the plurality of mixing channels.
Specifically the plurality of vanes may be configured that way that the mixed fuel and air mixture generates a swirl around the central axis of the swirler. The axial swirler preferably provides a rotational movement around the lateral axis of the mixing channel, to which the axial swirler is applied. As a result, from each mixing channel such rotating fuel/air mixture is entering a radially inner part of the swirler, in which the rotation around the swirler axis is initiated. Thus, several fuel/air streams with rotational movement—generated by the axial swirlers—along the lateral movement in direction of the mixing channels, get further mixed by the swirler resulting in an overall rotational movement along the central axis of the swirler. This results in an improved fuel to air mixture.
The mixing channel is a passage for fuel and air. The direction of this passage is defined by the orientation of the walls of the two adjacent opposite walls. Preferably the orientation of the walls is that way that—also ignoring the effect of the axial swirlers that are located in the mixing channels—the fuel and air will progress towards a central area of a swirler or burner and enter that central area slightly off the exact centre, so that the overall movement of the fuel and air will result in a corkscrew like movement around the central axis of the swirler or burner. Preferably the central axis of the swirler may be the same as the central axis of a burner, to which the swirler is applied.
Still ignoring the effect of the axial swirlers that are located in the mixing channels, the rotation of this corkscrew like movement may however be slower than the mean velocity by which the flow is traveling. This phenomenon is caused by the fact that the flow is turning, given a more tangential path around the central axis of the burner, which gives rise to a pressure difference between the neighbouring two swirler vanes in the flow passage.
In a preferred embodiment the axial swirler may extend between the walls of the two adjacent vanes. Preferably the axial swirler stretches over the complete cross section of the mixing channel through which is fuel and air mixture flows, so that advantageously all of the fuel and air mixture will pass the axial swirler. In an alternative embodiment a fraction of the fuel and air mixture may bypass the axial swirlers. This may occur, if the axial swirler does not extend over the complete cross section of the mixing channel.
In a further preferred embodiment the axial swirler may be arranged substantially perpendicular to the walls of the two adjacent vanes. This may result in a more symmetric swirl without any non-uniform turbulence. In an alternative construction the axial swirler may be in an angle different from 90 degrees in relation to the walls of the two adjacent vanes. If the walls of the two adjacent vanes are not in parallel, the axial swirler may be arranged so that it is substantially perpendicular in relation to the main flow direction within the mixing channel. Again, in an alternative solution, the angle may also be different from 90 degrees in relation to the main flow direction within the mixing channel.
In another preferred embodiment the axial swirler may have a plurality of swirler airfoils. The airfoils may be baffles to redirect the fuel/air stream and provide an additional rotational movement to the fuel/air stream passing the mixing channel. This may result in a corkscrew like movement at the end of the mixing channel.
In a further embodiment the axial swirler may have a rectangular solid frame surrounding the plurality of swirler airfoils. Advantageously the shape of the frame matches the cross section of the mixing channel.
In yet another embodiment, the plurality of swirler airfoils may have an elliptic, particularly circular, outer perimeter connected to the solid frame via this outer perimeter. Alternatively the plurality of swirler airfoils may have a rectangular, particularly square, outer perimeter connected to the solid frame via this outer perimeter.
The form of the swirler airfoils may be optimised to provide the best mixing in regards to a given arrangement of the walls and in regards to the position of the fuel injection openings. In one embodiment the plurality of swirler airfoils each may have a straight leading edge. Alternatively the plurality of swirler airfoils each may have a curved leading edge. Furthermore the plurality of swirler air foils each may have flat or a curved surface.
The swirler may be applied to a combustion chamber operating with liquid and/or gaseous fuel. In one preferred embodiment, the at least one fuel injection opening may be arranged to inject liquid fuel into an air flow flowing through the at least one of the plurality of mixing channels. In an alternative embodiment the at least one fuel injection opening may be arranged to inject gaseous fuel into an air flow flowing through the at least one of the plurality of mixing channels.
As a further option, the fuel injection openings are provided for both liquid and gaseous fuels. The fuel injection openings may be arranged in the same of at least one of the plurality of mixing channels for both types of fuels. Alternatively, the plurality of mixing channels may be equipped with fuel injection openings for liquid and gaseous fuels in an alternating or any other advantageous order.
The fuel injection openings may be arranged in various ways. Preferably they are located in a base plate of the swirler, each positioned substantially in the centre of the respective mixing channel. Alternatively the fuel injection openings may be positioned in the walls of the vanes. The fuel injection openings for gaseous fuel may be separate from the fuel injection openings for liquid fuel. Alternatively they may be arranged coaxially. The fuel injection openings for gaseous fuel may be positioned upstream of the fuel injection openings for liquid fuel.
Regarding their forms, orientations, and positions, the swirler itself, the vanes, the mixing channels, the fuel injection openings, and the axial swirlers may preferably be arranged in a homogeneous and substantially symmetric way, so that also a symmetric and uniform stream of mixed air and fuel in created.
In a further embodiment, the swirler or a burner-head may comprise at least one further fuel injection opening for providing pilot fuel—liquid or gas—arranged at a downstream section of the at least one mixing channel, further downstream of the axial swirler. Advantageously the pilot fuel may be controllable separately from the at least one fuel injection opening, which can be seen as “main fuel”.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:
The illustration in the drawing is schematically. It is noted that for similar or identical elements in different figures, the same reference signs will be used.
Not shown, a gas turbine engine comprises a compressor section, a combustor section and a turbine section which are arranged adjacent to each other. In operation of the gas turbine engine air is compressed by the compressor section and output to the burner section with one or more combustors.
A fuel supply 5 is provided for leading gaseous and/or liquid fuel to the burner which is to be mixed with inflowing air 6—particularly compressed air from a compressor (not shown)—in the swirler 2. By the swirler 2, the fuel and the air is mixed as will be explained later. The resulting fuel/air mixture 7 is then guided towards the primary combustion zone 9 where it is burnt to form hot, pressurised exhaust gases 8 flowing in a direction indicated by arrows to a turbine (not shown) of the gas turbine engine (not shown).
A perspective view of a prior art swirler 2 is shown in
The swirler passages 16 are arranged like that, that the fluid passing the passages 16 are directed to a radial outer section of the central opening 14. Furthermore the swirler passages 16 are substantially directed tangential to the radial outer section of the central opening 14. In this embodiment of the invention the opposing side faces 17 of a specific one of the swirler passages 16 are substantially planar and parallel to each other.
Referring now to
For each of the swirler passages 16, in
Further downstream, in
In
Referring now to
The fuel 25, 26 get mixed with the air 6, resulting in an exemplary distribution indicated by arrows 40, 41, and 42, which is a shear flow in the swirler passage 16. Stream 41 may the wanted fuel to air ratio, which is an optimum regarding flame stabilisation and emissions. Stream 40 may be an air enriched fuel/air mixture, whereas stream 42 may be a fuel enriched fuel/air mixture, which both may lead to decreased flame stabilisation in case of a lean fuel/air mixture or may lead to higher emissions of NOx in non-lean operation.
This is overcome by applying the axial swirler 20 in the swirler passage 16, as it can be seen in
Further components that can be seen in
The pilot fuel injections may optionally be present in all of the embodiments of the invention. The first pilot fuel injection 51 for liquid fuel is in the form of a valve. Only a single first pilot fuel injection 51 is shown in the figure but several can be present, preferably near the centre of the burner. The second pilot fuel injection 52 is shown in form of a ring so that pilot gas can be injected circumferentially at the ends of the swirler passages 16. It has to be noted that also other forms and locations of fuel injections may be possible. And as in all embodiments of the invention, a burner may be limited to only liquid fuel or only to gaseous fuel.
Advantageously the first pilot fuel injection 51 for liquid fuel and the second pilot fuel injection 52 for gaseous fuel are located downstream of the axial swirler 20. During operation of the gas turbine, the fuel—either gas or liquid—is introduced in two stages: with a main injection via the liquid fuel injector 22 and/or the gas fuel injector 21, which results in a high degree of premixedness and hence low NOx emissions, and a pilot injection via the first pilot fuel injection 51 for liquid fuel and/or the second pilot fuel injection 52 for gaseous fuel. The pilot injection may steadily be increased as the load demand decreases in order to ensure flame stability, which may not be guaranteed with lower loads. The first pilot fuel injection 51 for liquid fuel and/or the second pilot fuel injection 52 for gaseous fuel are arranged, such that as the pilot fuel split increases, the fuel is biased towards the axis—axis 12 as indicated in FIG. 1—of the combustor. This avoids problems with combustion instability at lower loads.
In operation mode with lean premix combustion, which may be selected to reduce NOx, pilot fuel injection may even be advantageous to stabilize the flame even at full load, however, the percentage of fuel injected via the pilot fuel injection 51 and 52 compared to the overall fuel injection may be small for full load, for example 5%.
With the pilot fuel injection severe combustion dynamics may be avoided, which otherwise could take place due to combustion at near limit of flammability.
In
In
In the example the airfoils 24 are fixed at a specific position between perimeter 30 and an inner ring 32. The sizes of the perimeter 30 and the inner ring 32 in the figure may only be seen as examples.
The axial swirler 20 may be constructed in several ways. Besides the two examples of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09005066 | Apr 2009 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/051667 | 2/11/2010 | WO | 00 | 10/4/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/115648 | 10/14/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2214568 | Thomas | Sep 1940 | A |
3657885 | Bader | Apr 1972 | A |
3691762 | Ryberg et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
5450724 | Kesseli et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5761906 | Norster | Jun 1998 | A |
5822992 | Dean | Oct 1998 | A |
5941075 | Ansart et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947081 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
6192669 | Keller et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6289677 | Prociw et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301899 | Dean et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7104251 | Kim | Sep 2006 | B2 |
20010027637 | Norster et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040142294 | Niass | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050257530 | Zupanc et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050279862 | Mao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060257807 | Hicks et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060266046 | Bonzani et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070028624 | Hsieh et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080041060 | Nilsson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090025394 | Bonzani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025395 | Nilsson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090277179 | Wilbraham | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090301092 | Wilbraham | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320485 | Wilbraham | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1497216 | May 2004 | CN |
101220955 | Jul 2008 | CN |
1497216 | Oct 2008 | CN |
1921378 | May 2008 | EP |
1992878 | Nov 2008 | EP |
865140 | Apr 1961 | GB |
2334087 | Aug 1999 | GB |
2435508 | Aug 2007 | GB |
2443431 | May 2008 | GB |
2444737 | Jun 2008 | GB |
2062405 | Jun 1996 | RU |
2157954 | Oct 2000 | RU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120017595 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |