1. Field
The present disclosure relates to switches, and particularly to a switch circuit and method of switching radio frequency (RF) signals within an integrated circuit. In one embodiment, the switch circuit comprises CMOS devices implemented on a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate, for use in RF applications such as wireless communications, satellites, and cable television.
2. Description of Related Art
As is well known, radio frequency (RF) switches are important building blocks in many wireless communication systems. RF switches are found in many different communications devices such as cellular telephones, wireless pagers, wireless infrastructure equipment, satellite communications equipment, and cable television equipment. As is well known, the performance of RF switches is controlled by three primary operating performance parameters: insertion loss, switch isolation, and the “1 dB compression point.” These three performance parameters are tightly coupled, and any one parameter can be emphasized in the design of RF switch components at the expense of others. A fourth performance parameter that is occasionally considered in the design of RF switches is commonly referred to as the switching time or switching speed (defined as the time required to turn one side of a switch on and turn the other side off). Other characteristics that are important in RF switch design include ease and degree (or level) of integration of the RF switch, complexity, yield, return loss and cost of manufacture.
These RF switch performance parameters can be more readily described with reference to a prior art RF switch design shown in the simplified circuit schematics of
As shown in
IL is approximately equal to: 10r/R0ln(10)=0.087r(in dB). Equation 1:
Thus, at low frequencies, a 3-Ω value for r results in approximately 0.25 dB insertion loss.
Because insertion loss depends greatly upon the on resistances of the RF switch transmitters, lowering the transistor on resistances and reducing the parasitic substrate resistances can achieve improvements in insertion loss.
In general, the input-to-output isolation (or more simply, the switch isolation) of an RF switch is determined by measuring the amount of power that “bleeds” from the input port into the output port when the transistor connecting the two ports is off. The isolation characteristic measures how well the RF switch turns off (i.e., how well the switch blocks the input signal from the output). More specifically, and referring now to the “off” state of the RF switch 10 of
When turned off (i.e., when the RF switch 10 and the switching transistor M15 are turned off), M15 is primarily capacitive with “feedthrough” (i.e., passing of the RF input signal from the input node 1 to the output node 3) of the input signal determined by the series/parallel values of the capacitors CGD off 15 (Gate-to-Drain Capacitance when the switching transistor M1 is turned off), CGS off 17 (Gate-to-Source Capacitance when the switching transistor M1 is turned off), and CDS119 (Drain-to-Source capacitance when the transistor M1 is turned off). Feedthrough of the input signal is undesirable and is directly related to the input-to-output isolation of the RF switch 10. The shunting transistor M27 is used to reduce the magnitude of the feedthrough and thereby increase the isolation characteristic of the RF switch.
The shunting transistor M27 of
In addition to RF switch insertion loss and isolation, another important RF switch performance characteristic is the ability to handle large input power when the switch is turned on to ensure that insertion loss is not a function of power at a fixed frequency. Many applications require that the switch does not distort power transmitted through a “switched-on” switch. For example, if two closely spaced tones are concurrently passed through an RF switch, nonlinearities in the switch can produce inter-modulation (IM) and can thereby create a false tone in adjacent channels. If these adjacent channels are reserved, for instance, for information signals, power in these false tones must be maintained as small as possible. The switch compression, or “1 dB compression point” (“P1 dB”), is indicative of the switch's ability to handle power. The P1 dB is defined as the input power at which the insertion loss has increased by 1 dB from its low-power value. Or stated in another way, the 1 dB compression point is a measure of the amount of power that can be input to the RF switch at the input port before the output power deviates from a linear relationship with the input power by 1 dB.
Switch compression occurs in one of two ways. To understand how switch compression occurs, operation of the MOSFET transistors shown in the RF switch 10 of
Referring again to
As shown in
With varying performance results, RF switches, such as the SPDT RF switch 20 of
Although GaAs RF switch implementations offer improved performance characteristics, the technology has several disadvantages. For example, GaAs technology exhibits relatively low yields of properly functioning integrated circuits. GaAs RF switches tend to be relatively expensive to design and manufacture. In addition, although GaAs switches exhibit improved insertion loss characteristics as described above, they may have low frequency limitations due to slow states present in the GaAs substrate. The technology also does not lend itself to high levels of integration, which requires that digital control circuitry associated with the RF switch be implemented “off chip” from the switch. The low power control circuitry associated with the switch has proven difficult to integrate. This is disadvantageous as it both increases the overall system cost or manufacture, size and complexity, as well as reducing system throughput speeds.
It is therefore desirable to provide an RF switch and method for switching RF signals having improved performance characteristics. Specifically, it is desirable to provide an RF switch having improved insertion loss, isolation, and compression. It is desirable that such an RF switch be easily designed and manufactured, relatively inexpensive to manufacture, lend itself to high levels of integration, with low-to-high frequency application. Power control circuitry should be easily integrated on-chip together with the switch functions. Such integration has been heretofore difficult to achieve using Si and GaAs substrates. The present teachings provide such an RF switch and method for switching RF signals.
A novel RF switch circuit and method for switching RF signals is described. The RF switch circuit may be used in wireless applications, and may be fabricated in a silicon-on-insulator technology. In one embodiment the RF switch is fabricated on an Ultra-Thin-Silicon (“UTSi”) substrate. In one embodiment the RF switch includes: an input for receiving an RF signal; a first switching transistor grouping connected to the input to receive the RF signal and connected to an RF common port, wherein the first switching transistor is controlled by a switching voltage (SW); a second switching transistor grouping connected to the first switching transistor grouping and the RF common port, wherein the second switching transistor is controlled by a switching voltage SW_, and wherein SW is the inverse of SW so that when the first switching transistor grouping is on, the second switching transistor grouping is off. The switching transistor groupings, when enabled, alternatively connect their respective RF input signals to the RF common port. In this embodiment the RF switch also includes shunting transistor groupings coupled to the switching transistor groupings and also controlled by the switching voltages SW and SW_. The shunting transistor groupings, when enabled, act to alternatively shunt their associated RF input nodes to ground thereby improving RF switch isolation.
The switching and shunting transistor groupings comprise one or more MOSFET transistors connected together in a “stacked” or serial configuration. Within each transistor grouping, the gates of the stacked transistors are commonly controlled by a switching voltage (SW or SW_) that is coupled to each transistor gate through respective gate resistors. The stacking of transistor grouping devices and gate resistors increases the compression point of the switch. The RC time constant formed by the gate resistors and the gate capacitance of the MOSFETs is designed to be much longer than the period of the RF signal, causing the RF voltage to be shared equally across the series connected devices. This configuration increases the 1 dB compression point of the RF switch.
A fully integrated RF switch is described that includes digital switch control logic and a negative power supply voltage generator circuit integrated together with the inventive RF switch. In one embodiment, the fully integrated RF switch provides several functions not present in prior art RF switches. For example, in one embodiment, the fully integrated RF switch includes a built-in oscillator that provides clocking input signals to a charge pump circuit, an integrated charge pump circuit that generates the negative power supply voltages required by the other RF switch circuits, CMOS logic circuitry that generates control signals to control the RF switch transistors, level-shifting and low current voltage divider circuits that provide increased reliability of the switch devices, and an RF buffer circuit that isolates RF signal energy from the charge pump and digital control logic circuits. Several embodiments of the charge pump, level shifting, voltage divider, and RF buffer circuits are described. The inventive RF switch provides improvements in insertion loss, switch isolation, and switch compression. In addition, owing to the higher levels of integration made available by the present inventive RF switch, RF system design and fabrication costs are reduced and reliability is increased using the present method and apparatus.
a is a simplified electrical schematic of a prior art single pole, single throw (SPST) RF switch used to demonstrate performance characteristics of the RF switch.
b is a simplified electrical schematic of the SPST RF switch of
c shows the equivalent small-signal electrical characteristics of the RF switch of
a is a simplified block diagram of one exemplary embodiment of the negative voltage generator shown in the simplified block diagram of
c is a plot of voltage amplitude versus time showing the voltage amplitude of two non-overlapping clock signals used to control the charge pump circuit of
a is an electrical schematic of a first embodiment of an inventive level shifting circuit;
a is a voltage amplitude versus time plot of a digital input signal and corresponding output signal generated by the inventive level shifter of
a is an electrical schematic of one embodiment of a two-stage level shifter and RF buffer circuit including a first stage level shifter and a second stage RF buffer circuit;
a is an electrical schematic of one embodiment of a low current voltage divider (LCVD) circuit made in accordance with the present RF switch method and apparatus;
a and 11b are electrical schematics showing an alternative embodiment of the two-stage level shifter and RF buffer circuit of
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Throughout this description, the preferred embodiment and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than as limitations on the present method and apparatus.
The Inventive RF Switch
The present method and apparatus is a novel RF switch design and method for switching RF circuits. A first exemplary embodiment of the present inventive RF switch 30 is shown in
In one embodiment of the present inventive RF switch, the MOSFET transistors (e.g., the transistors M37A, M37B, and M37C) are implemented using a fully insulating substrate silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology. More specifically, and as described in more detail hereinbelow, the MOSFET transistors of the inventive RF switch are implemented using “Ultra-Thin-Silicon (UTSi)” (also referred to herein as “ultrathin silicon-on-sapphire”) technology. In accordance with UTSi manufacturing methods, the transistors used to implement the inventive RF switch are formed in an extremely thin layer of silicon in an insulating sapphire wafer. The fully insulating sapphire substrate enhances the performance characteristics of the inventive RF switch by reducing the deleterious substrate coupling effects associated with non-insulating and partially insulating substrates. For example, improvements in insertion loss are realized by lowering the transistor on resistances and by reducing parasitic substrate resistances. In addition, switch isolation is improved using the fully insulating substrates provided by UTSi technology. Owing to the fully insulating nature of silicon-on-sapphire technology, the parasitic capacitance between the nodes of the RF switch 30 is greatly reduced as compared with bulk CMOS and other traditional integrated circuit manufacturing technologies. Consequently, the inventive RF switch exhibits improved switch isolation as compared with the prior art RF switch designs.
As shown in
In one embodiment, the transistor grouping resistors comprise approximately 30 K ohm resistors, although alternative resistance values can be used without departing from the spirit or scope of the present method and apparatus. In addition, in some embodiments of the present method and apparatus, the gate resistors comprise any resistive element having a relatively high resistance value. For example, reversed-biased diodes may be used to implement the gate resistors in one embodiment. As described in more detail below, the gate resistors help to increase the effective breakdown voltage across the series connected transistors.
The control signals function to control the enabling and disabling of the transistor groupings 33, 34, 37 and 38, and the RF switch 30 generally functions to pass and block RF signals in a manner that is similar to the control of the analogous transistors of the switch of
The control voltages are connected to alternatively enable and disable selective pairs of transistor groupings. For example, as shown in
One purpose of the stacking of MOSFET transistors and using gate resistors as shown in the inventive RF switch 30 of
To achieve improved switch performance, the RC time constant must be sized so that it is large with respect to the period of the RF signal. This largely places a constraint on the minimum value of R that can be used to implement the gate transistors. As noted above, in one embodiment of the present method and apparatus, a typical value of R is 30 k-ohms, although other resistance values can be used without departing from the scope of the present method and apparatus. Because a MOSFET gate input draws no DC current, there is no change in the biasing of the devices due to IR drops across this resistance.
Advantageously, the present inventive RF switch 30 can accommodate input signals of increased power levels. Owing to the serial arrangement of the MOSFET transistors that comprise the transistor groupings (33, 34, 37 and 38), increased power signals can be presented at the RF input nodes (i.e., at the input nodes 31 and 32) without detrimentally affecting switch operation. Those skilled in the transistor design arts art shall recognize that greater input power levels can be accommodated by increasing the number of transistors per transistor grouping, or by varying the physical configuration of the transistors. For example, in one embodiment, the transistors are approximately 0.5×2,100 micro-meters in dimension. However, alternative configurations can be used without departing from the scope or spirit of the present method and apparatus.
Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) Technologies
As noted above in the description of the RF switch of
Fabrication of devices on an insulating substrate requires that an effective method for forming silicon CMOS devices on the insulating substrate be used. The advantages of using a composite substrate comprising a monocrystalline semiconductor layer, such as silicon, epitaxially deposited on a supporting insulating substrate, such as sapphire, are well-recognized, and can be realized by employing as the substrate an insulating material, such as sapphire (Al2O3), spinel, or other known highly insulating materials, and providing that the conduction path of any inter-device leakage current must pass through the substrate.
An “ideal” silicon-on-insulator wafer can be defined to include a completely monocrystalline, defect-free silicon layer of sufficient thickness to accommodate the fabrication of active devices therein. The silicon layer would be adjacent to an insulating substrate and would have a minimum of crystal lattice discontinuities at the silicon-insulator interface. Early attempts to fabricate this “ideal” silicon-on-insulator wafer were frustrated by a number of significant problems, which can be summarized as (1) substantial incursion of contaminants into the epitaxially deposited silicon layer, especially the p-dopant aluminum, as a consequence of the high temperatures used in the initial epitaxial silicon deposition and the subsequent annealing of the silicon layer to reduce defects therein; and (2) poor crystalline quality of the epitaxial silicon layers when the problematic high temperatures were avoided or worked around through various implanting, annealing, and/or re-growth schemes.
It has been found that the high quality silicon films suitable for demanding device applications can be fabricated on sapphire substrates by a method that involves epitaxial deposition of a silicon layer on a sapphire substrate, low temperature ion implant to form a buried amorphous region in the silicon layer, and annealing the composite at temperatures below about 950° C.
Examples of and methods for making such silicon-on-sapphire devices are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,416,043 (“Minimum charge FET fabricated on an ultrathin silicon on sapphire wafer”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,492,857 (“High-frequency wireless communication system on a single ultrathin silicon on sapphire chip”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,572,040 (“High-frequency wireless communication system on a single ultrathin silicon on sapphire chip”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,596,205 (“High-frequency wireless communication system on a single ultrathin silicon on sapphire chip”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,600,169 (“Minimum charge FET fabricated on an ultrathin silicon on sapphire wafer”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,663,570 (“High-frequency wireless communication system on a single ultrathin silicon on sapphire chip”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,336 (“High-frequency wireless communication system on a single ultrathin silicon on sapphire chip”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,863,823 (“Self-aligned edge control in silicon on insulator”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,883,396 (“High-frequency wireless communication system on a single ultrathin silicon on sapphire chip”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,895,957 (“Minimum charge FET fabricated on an ultrathin silicon on sapphire wafer”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,920,233 (“Phase locked loop including a sampling circuit for reducing spurious side bands”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,930,638 (“Method of making a low parasitic resistor on ultrathin silicon on insulator”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,973,363 (“CMOS circuitry with shortened P-channel length on ultrathin silicon on insulator”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,973,382 (“Capacitor on ultrathin semiconductor on insulator”); and U.S. Pat. No. 6,057,555 (“High-frequency wireless communication system on a single ultrathin silicon on sapphire chip”). All of these referenced patents are incorporated herein in their entirety for their teachings on ultrathin silicon-on-sapphire integrated circuit design and fabrication.
Using the methods described in the patents referenced above, electronic devices can be formed in an extremely thin layer of silicon on an insulating synthetic sapphire wafer. The thickness of the silicon layer is typically less than 150 nm. Such an “ultrathin” silicon layer maximizes the advantages of the insulating sapphire substrate and allows the integration of multiple functions on a single integrated circuit. Traditional transistor isolation wells required for thick silicon are unnecessary, simplifying transistor processing and increasing circuit density. To distinguish these above-referenced methods and devices from earlier thick-silicon embodiments, they are herein referred to collectively as “ultrathin silicon-on-sapphire.”
In some preferred embodiments of the method and apparatus, the MOS transistors are formed in ultrathin silicon-on-sapphire wafers by the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,416,043; 5,492,857; 5,572,040; 5,596,205; 5,600,169; 5,663,570; 5,861,336; 5,863,823; 5,883,396; 5,895,957; 5,920,233; 5,930,638; 5,973,363; 5,973,382; and 6,057,555. However, other known methods of fabricating ultrathin silicon-on-sapphire integrated circuits can be used without departing from the spirit or scope of the present method and apparatus.
As described and claimed in these patents, high quality silicon films suitable for demanding device applications can be fabricated on insulating substrates by a method that involves epitaxial deposition of a silicon layer on an insulating substrate, low temperature ion implantation to form a buried amorphous region in the silicon layer, and annealing the composite at temperatures below about 950° C. Any processing of the silicon layer which subjects it to temperatures in excess of approximately 950° C. is performed in an oxidizing ambient environment. The thin silicon films in which the transistors are formed typically have an areal density of electrically active states in regions not intentionally doped which is less than approximately 5.×1011 cm−2.
As noted above, UTSi substrates are especially desirable for RF applications because the fully insulating substrate reduces the detrimental effects of substrate coupling associated with traditional substrates (i.e., substrates that are not fully insulating). Consequently, in one embodiment, the RF switch 30 of
RF Switch Design Tradeoffs
Several design parameters and tradeoffs should be considered in designing and implementing the inventive RF switch 30 described above with reference to
As described above with reference to
As is well known in the transistor design arts, in an N channel MOS transistor, the “on” resistance is inversely proportional to the difference between the voltage applied at the transistor gate and the voltage applied at the transistor source. This voltage is commonly referred to as the “Vgs” (gate-to-source voltage). It is readily observed that as the magnitude of the RF signal (Vs) increases at the input port (e.g., at the first RF input node 31 of
A similar concern exists for the “off” transistors. It is important to note that for typical RF switch applications, the RF input signals (e.g., the RF 1 input signal) generally swing about a zero reference voltage. The off transistors (e.g., the transistors in the shunting transistor grouping 37) must remain disabled or turned off during both the positive and negative voltage excursions of the RF input signal. This argues for making the gate control voltage of the off transistors (e.g., the SW_ control voltage signal) as negative as possible. Again, reliability concerns limit the extent to which this gate control voltage can be made negative.
For a CMOS switch, the design of the off transistor also limits the 1 dB compression point of the switch. As is well known in the transistor design arts, MOS transistors have a fundamental breakdown voltage between their source and drain. When the potential across the device exceeds this breakdown voltage, a high current flows between source and drain even when a gate potential exists that is attempting to keep the transistor in an off state. Improvements in switch compression can be achieved by increasing the breakdown voltage of the transistors. One method of fabricating a MOS transistor with a high breakdown voltage is to increase the length of the gate. Unfortunately, an increase in gate length also disadvantageously increases the channel resistance of the device thereby increasing the insertion loss of the device. The channel resistance can be decreased by making the device wider; however, this also decreases the switch isolation. Hence, tradeoffs exist in MOS switch designs.
As described above with reference to the inventive RF switch 30 of
An additional design consideration concerns the “body tie” used in traditional bulk CMOS transistors. As is well known in the transistor design arts, the body tie electrically couples the device either to the well or to the substrate. The well-substrate junction must remain reversed biased at all times. The source-to-body and drain-to-body junctions must remain reversed biased at all times. In general, for bulk CMOS designs, the well (for N-well technology) is tied to the most positive potential that will be applied to the circuit. The substrate (for P-well technology) is tied to the most negative potential that will be applied to the circuit. Because the RF input signal swings symmetrically above and below ground, bulk CMOS switch designs exhibit poor insertion loss, isolation, and 1 dB compression point performance. For these reasons, and those described above, the present RF switch 30 is preferably implemented on an insulating substrate.
Implementing the inventive RF switch on an insulating substrate provides several advantages such as improved switch isolation and reduced insertion loss. Further advantages are achieved by implementing the inventive RF switch using UTSi technology. For example, as compared with the prior art RF switch implementations in GaAs, improvements in integrated circuit yields, reduced fabrication costs, and increased levels of integration are achieved using UTSi. As is well known in the integrated circuit design arts, GaAs does not lend itself to high levels of integration. Thus, the digital control circuitry and other circuitry associated with the operation and function of the RF switch (such as a negative voltage power supply generator, level shifting, low current voltage divider and RF buffer circuits) must often be implemented off-chip (i.e., these functions are not easily integrated with the RF switch). This leads to increased costs and reduced performance of the prior art RF switch implementations.
In contrast, in accordance with the present RF switch method and apparatus, using UTSi technology, the circuitry necessary for the proper operation and functioning of the RF switch can be integrated together on the same integrated circuit as the switch itself. For example, and as described below in more detail, by implementing the RF switch in UTSi technology, the RF switch can be integrated in the same integrated circuit with a negative voltage generator and the CMOS control logic circuitry required to control the operation of the RF switch. The complexity of the RF switch is also reduced owing to the reduction in control lines required to control the operation of the switch. Advantageously, the RF switch control logic can be implemented using low voltage CMOS transistors. In addition, even for high power RF switch implementations, a single, relatively low power external power supply can be used to power the present inventive RF switch. This feature is advantageous as compared to the prior art GaAs implementations that require use of a relatively high power external power supply and power generation circuitry necessary to generate both positive and negative power supplies. For example, in the exemplary embodiments described below with reference to
Fully Integrated RF Switch
As described in more detail below, the fully integrated RF switch 100 includes several functions and features not present in the prior art RF switch of
Negative Voltage Generator—Charge Pump—A First Embodiment
As shown in
In addition, in the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment of the present method and apparatus, the negative voltage generator 120 of
Many prior art RF switches disadvantageously require that the negative power supply voltages be generated by circuitry that is external to the RF switch circuitry. Other RF switch implementations use a coupling approach necessary to shift the DC value of the RF input signal to the midpoint of the applied bias voltage. This approach generally requires that relatively high bias voltages be applied because of the effective halving of the FET gate drive due to this level shifting. If the bias voltages are not increased, this produces a negative effect on the switch insertion loss because the gate drive is thereby reduced and the FET channel resistances are increased.
To address these problems, one embodiment of the fully integrated RF switch 100 uses the inventive charge pump circuit 206 shown in detail in
The charge pump 206 generates a negative power supply voltage (−Vdd) by alternately charging and discharging the two capacitors (Cp 216 and the output capacitor C 218) using the non-overlapping clock input signals Clk1 and Clk2 to drive the transistor gates. The negative power supply voltage, −Vdd, is generated from the charge that is stored on the capacitor C 218. In one embodiment, a pulse shift circuit (not shown) is used to generate a pulse train that drives the charge pump (i.e., the pulse train is input as the clock input signals Clk1 and Clk2). As the pulse train is applied to the charge pump 206, the capacitor Cp 216 is applied the positive power supply Vdd and then discharged across the output capacitor C 218 in an opposite direction to produce the negative power supply voltage −Vdd. No transistor in the charge pump must standoff more than Vdd across any source/drain nodes, hence greatly increasing the reliability of the charge pump 206.
In one embodiment of the inventive charge pump circuit 206, the output C 218 has a capacitance of approximately 200 pF, and Cp 216 has a capacitance of approximately 50 pF. Those skilled in the charge pump design arts shall recognize that other capacitance values can be used without departing from the scope or spirit of the present method and apparatus.
In one embodiment, as shown in the simplified block diagram of
c shows the voltage amplitude of the two non-overlapping clock signals, Clk1 and Clk2, varying over time. As shown in
The charge pump transistors, 208, 210, 212 and 214 advantageously comprise single-threshold N-channel (212, 214) and P-channel (208, 210) devices. Previous charge pump circuits require use of multi-threshold level devices. These previous implementations are therefore more complex in design and cost than the inventive charge pump circuit 206 of
Level Shifting Circuitry
Because the charge pump circuitry effectively doubles the power supply voltages that are applied to the circuit, careful attention must be paid to any potential reliability issues associated with these higher voltages. In order to implement the charge pump in a manner that increases the reliability of the transistors, level shifting circuitry is used to limit the gate-to-source, gate-to-drain, and drain-to-source voltages on the transistors to acceptable levels.
An inventive level shifting circuit 300 made in accordance with the present method and apparatus is shown in
As shown in
The output of the first group of inverters, “out”, is generated by a first output inverter 306, and is provided on a first output node 314. The output of the second group of inverters, “out_”, is generated by a second output inverter 312, and is provided on a second output node 316. The two level shifter outputs, “out” and “out_”, are input to other circuits of the fully integrated RF switch 100 of
The level shifter 300 of
Referring again to
When the digital input signal on the input node 318 reaches a logical “high” state (i.e., in some embodiments, when the input signal transitions from GND to +Vdd), the “in” signal (at the node 324) and the “in_” signal (at the node 326) go to ground (e.g., 0 VDC) and Vdd (e.g., 3 VDC), respectively. The “out” signal at the first output node 314 is driven to +Vdd. At the same time, the “out_” signal at the second output node 316 is driven towards −Vdd. The feedback (of “out_” fed back to the input of the inverter 304 and “out” fed forward to the input of the inverter 310) configuration ensures the rapid change in state of the level shifter 300. The level shifter 300 works similarly when the input signal transitions from a logic high to a logic low state (i.e., transitions from +Vdd to GND). When the digital input signal on the input node 318 reaches a logic “low” state, the “in” signal (at the node 324) and the “in_” signal (at the node 326) go to Vdd (e.g., 3 VDC), and ground, respectively. The “out” signal at the first output node 314 is driven to −Vdd. At the same time, the “out_” signal at the second output node 316 is driven towards +Vdd. The feedback again ensures the rapid change in state of the level shifter 300. The grounding contribution ensures that the level shifter inverters never see more than a full Vdd voltage drop across the source/drain nodes of the MOSFET transistors of the inverters.
b shows one embodiment of the inverters (e.g., the inverters 302, 304, and 306) used to implement the level shifter 300 of
Thus, using the present inventive level shifter 300, digital input signals that initially range from GND to +Vdd are shifted to range from −Vdd to +Vdd.
b shows a simplified logic symbol for the inventive level shifter 300 of
RF Buffer Circuit
a is an electrical schematic of a two-stage level shifter and RF buffer circuit 400.
The RF buffer electrically isolates the digital control signals (such as those generated by the CMOS logic block 110 of
When very large power RF input signals are input to the inventive RF switch 30, coupling of the RF signals to the digital logic signals can occur unless an RF buffer circuit is used to isolate the digital logic signals from the RF switch. The RF coupling can and usually will detrimentally affect the RF transistor control signals (SW and SW_). For example, when RF input signals on the order of approximately 30 dBm are input to a 1 watt RF switch 30, RF coupling can cause voltage swings of several tenths of a volt on the digital control lines. This is due to the feedback of RF signals from the RF switch through to the digital control circuitry. This RF coupling effect can adversely affect the enabling and disabling of the RF transistor groupings and hence the proper operation of the RF switch 30. The buffer circuit 402 of
As shown in
Importantly, although the first stage level shifter 300 uses feedback to perform the level shifting function (as described above with reference to
More specifically, and referring again to
In one embodiment, the inverters used to implement the two-stage level shifter and RF buffer circuit 400 comprise the inverter 340 described above with reference to
Voltage Divider for Use in an Alternative Level Shifting Circuit
a is an electrical schematic of one embodiment of a low current voltage divider (“LCVD”) circuit 500 that is used in the feedback path of one embodiment of the level shifter 300 described above with reference to
The gate oxide reliability issues can be averted by ensuring that the maximum voltage applied across the gate oxide of the feedback inverters 304, 310 is lowered to approximately Vdd (as contrasted with gate oxide voltages of 2*Vdd). Therefore, in one embodiment of the present inventive fully integrated RF switch, the voltage divider of
Referring now to
The diode devices are used to divide the voltage of an input signal provided to the voltage divider 500 at an input node 514. As shown in
A ballast resistor, R 516, is connected to the source of the output diode device 508 as shown. Once the diode devices turn on fully, the ballast resistor R 516 drops any additional input voltage that exceeds the value of n*Vthn. In the embodiment shown in
The output MOSFET M2512 is configured as a capacitor and is used to assist in accelerating the switching time of the voltage divider 500. The MOSFET M3510 assures that the output node 520 swings to the potential of the input signal at the input node 514 when the input goes to a negative potential. This is accomplished by the device M3510 turning on when the input signal goes to a negative potential. Thus, when the input signal goes to a −Vdd potential (e.g., −3 VDC), the output signal at the output node 520 also goes to −Vdd. The output device 508 is reversed biased during negative voltage swings of the input signal assuring that no DC current is drained from the negative power supply during the negative voltage swings of the input signal. When the voltage divider output is approximately −3 VDC, the voltage divider 500 draws no current. This is important because a current at −3 VDC discharges the charge pump circuit described above with reference to
In one embodiment, the ballast resistor R 516 has a value of 100 k-ohms. In one embodiment all of the devices of the voltage divider 500 have the same length. For example, in one embodiment, all of the devices have a length of 0.8 micro-meters. In one embodiment, all of the diode devices (502, 504, 506, and 508) have identical physical dimensions. In one embodiment, the diode devices each have a width of 2 micro-meters, the device M3510 has the same width of 2 micro-meters, and the output MOSFET M2512 has a width of 14 micro-meters. Those skilled in the integrated circuit design arts shall recognize that other values and alternative configurations for the devices shown in
Modified Level Shifter Using the Voltage Divider
By reducing the voltages that are applied to the gate oxides of the RF switch transistors, the voltage divider 500 of
Note that the RF switch control signals, “SW” and “SW_”, can be tapped from the level shifter outputs prior to their input to the voltage dividers 500′ and 500″, and provided as input to the inventive RF switch 30 of
The potential gate oxide reliability problems associated with the level shifter 300 described above with reference to
By coupling the output inverters 602, 604 in this manner, the modified level shifter 600 output signals never exceed Vdd (or −Vdd). More specifically, the first output inverter 602 generates an output signal, “out_pos”, at a first output node 606, that ranges from GND (i.e., 0 VDC) to +Vdd. The second output inverter 604 generates a second output signal, “out_neg”, at a second output node 608, which ranges from −Vdd to GND. When the input signal “in_” goes to GND, the output signal “out_pos” also goes to GND. The output signal “out_neg” transfers from GND to −Vdd. When the input signal “in_” goes positive to +Vdd, “out_pos” also goes to Vdd, and “out_neg” transfers from −Vdd to GND. Thus, using the present modified level shifter 600, the “out_pos” output signal ranges from GND to +Vdd, while the “out_neg” output signal ranges from −Vdd to GND. As described below in more detail, the two output signals, “out_pos” and “out_neg”, are used to address potential gate oxide reliability problems in a modified charge pump circuit. As described now with reference to
Modified Level Shifter and RF Buffer Circuit
The two-stage level shifter and RF buffer 400 described above with reference to
a and 11b show an alternative embodiment 400′ of the two-stage level shifter and RF buffer circuit 400 described above with reference to
The RF buffer inverters 702, 704 are used to control the power supply voltages of a first RF output inverter 712. Similarly, the RF buffer inverters 708, 710 are used to control the power supply voltages of a second RF output inverter 714. In this embodiment, the RF buffer output signals, “out” and “out_”, are used to control the RF switch (i.e., output signal “out” acts as control voltage “SW”, while “out_” acts as control voltage “SW_”).
Modified Charge Pump—An Alternative Embodiment
As noted above, the two output signals “out_pos” and “out_neg” generated by the modified level shifter 600 of
The charge pump 206′ functions very similarly to the charge pump 206 described above with reference to
As shown in
The four modified level shifters generate the half-rail clock control signals that are used to control the charge pump 206′. Specifically, as shown in
Those skilled in the transistor design arts shall recognize that other control configurations can be used without departing from the spirit or scope of the present method and apparatus. For example, the other two level shifters (804, 810) can be used to generate the control signals in an alternative embodiment of the modified charge pump. Also, as described above with reference to the charge pump circuit 206, alternative transistor configurations (N-channel and P-channel) can be used to implement the modified charge pump 206′ of the present method and apparatus.
As shown in
A novel RF switch is provided wherein the switch is fabricated using an SOI CMOS process. Fabricating the switch on an SOI substrate results in lack of substrate bias and allows the integration of key CMOS circuit building blocks with the RF switch elements. Integration of the CMOS building blocks with RF switch elements provides a fully integrated RF switch solution that requires use of only a single external power supply (i.e., the negative power supply voltage is generated internally by a charge pump circuit integrated with the RF switch). This results in improvements in RF switch isolation, insertion loss and compression. In one embodiment, the RF switch has a 1 dB compression point exceeding approximately 1 Watt, an insertion loss of less than approximately 0.5 dB, and switch isolation as high as approximately 40 dB. The inventive switch also provides improvements in switching times.
A number of embodiments of the present method and apparatus have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the method and apparatus.
Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present method and apparatus is not to be limited by the specific illustrated embodiments, but only by the scope of the appended claims.
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/315,395, filed Dec. 1, 2008, which issues Dec. 28, 2010 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,860,499, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/582,206, filed Oct. 16, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,460,852 issued Dec. 2, 2008, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/922,135, filed Aug. 18, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,898 issued Oct. 17, 2006, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/267,531, filed Oct. 8, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,804,502 issued Oct. 12, 2004, which claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/328,353, filed Oct. 10, 2001, and each of these patent documents is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3646361 | Pfiffner | Feb 1972 | A |
3697860 | Baker | Oct 1972 | A |
3699359 | Shelby | Oct 1972 | A |
3731112 | Smith | May 1973 | A |
3878450 | Greatbatch | Apr 1975 | A |
3942047 | Buchanan | Mar 1976 | A |
3943428 | Whidden | Mar 1976 | A |
3955353 | Astle | May 1976 | A |
3975671 | Stoll | Aug 1976 | A |
3988727 | Scott | Oct 1976 | A |
4047091 | Hutchines et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4053916 | Cricchi et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4061929 | Asano | Dec 1977 | A |
4068295 | Portmann | Jan 1978 | A |
4079336 | Gross | Mar 1978 | A |
4106086 | Holbrook et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4186436 | Ishiwatari | Jan 1980 | A |
4189651 | Akamatsu | Feb 1980 | A |
4241316 | Knapp | Dec 1980 | A |
4244000 | Ueda et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4256977 | Hendrickson | Mar 1981 | A |
4316101 | Minner | Feb 1982 | A |
4317055 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4321661 | Sano | Mar 1982 | A |
4367421 | Baker | Jan 1983 | A |
4390798 | Kurafuji | Jun 1983 | A |
4460952 | Risinger | Jul 1984 | A |
RE31749 | Yamashiro | Nov 1984 | E |
4485433 | Topich | Nov 1984 | A |
4621315 | Vaughn et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4633106 | Backes et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4638184 | Kimura | Jan 1987 | A |
4679134 | Bingham | Jul 1987 | A |
4703196 | Arakawa | Oct 1987 | A |
4736169 | Weaver et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4739191 | Puar | Apr 1988 | A |
4746960 | Valeri et al. | May 1988 | A |
4748485 | Vasudev | May 1988 | A |
4752699 | Cranford et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4769784 | Doluca et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4777577 | Bingham et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4809056 | Shirato et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4810911 | Noguchi | Mar 1989 | A |
4825145 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4839787 | Kojima et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4847519 | Wahl et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4849651 | Estes, Jr. | Jul 1989 | A |
4890077 | Sun | Dec 1989 | A |
4891609 | Eilley | Jan 1990 | A |
4897774 | Bingham et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4906587 | Blake | Mar 1990 | A |
4929855 | Ezzeddine | May 1990 | A |
4939485 | Eisenberg | Jul 1990 | A |
4984040 | Yap | Jan 1991 | A |
4985647 | Kawada | Jan 1991 | A |
4999585 | Burt et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5001528 | Bahraman | Mar 1991 | A |
5012123 | Ayasli et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5023494 | Tsukii et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5029282 | Ito | Jul 1991 | A |
5032799 | Milberger et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038325 | Douglas et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041797 | Belcher et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5061907 | Rasmussen | Oct 1991 | A |
5061911 | Weidman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5068626 | Takagi et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5081371 | Wong | Jan 1992 | A |
5081706 | Kim | Jan 1992 | A |
5093667 | Andricos | Mar 1992 | A |
5095348 | Houston | Mar 1992 | A |
5111375 | Marshall | May 1992 | A |
5124762 | Childs et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5126590 | Chern | Jun 1992 | A |
5138190 | Yamazaki et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146178 | Nojima et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148393 | Furuyama | Sep 1992 | A |
5157279 | Lee | Oct 1992 | A |
5182529 | Chern | Jan 1993 | A |
5193198 | Yokouchi | Mar 1993 | A |
5208557 | Kersh, III | May 1993 | A |
5212456 | Kovalcik et al. | May 1993 | A |
5272457 | Heckaman et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274343 | Russell et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5283457 | Matloubian | Feb 1994 | A |
5285367 | Keller | Feb 1994 | A |
5306954 | Chan et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5313083 | Schindler | May 1994 | A |
5317181 | Tyson | May 1994 | A |
5345422 | Redwine | Sep 1994 | A |
5350957 | Cooper et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5375256 | Yokoyama et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375257 | Lampen | Dec 1994 | A |
5392186 | Alexander et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392205 | Zavaleta | Feb 1995 | A |
5405795 | Beyer et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416043 | Burgener et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422586 | Tedrow et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5442327 | Longbrake et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446418 | Hara et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448207 | Kohama | Sep 1995 | A |
5455794 | Javanifard et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465061 | Dufour | Nov 1995 | A |
5477184 | Uda et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5488243 | Tsuruta et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492857 | Reedy et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493249 | Manning | Feb 1996 | A |
5519360 | Keeth | May 1996 | A |
5535160 | Yamaguchi | Jul 1996 | A |
5548239 | Kohama | Aug 1996 | A |
3470443 | Berry et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5553021 | Kubono et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5553295 | Pantelakis et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5554892 | Norimatsu | Sep 1996 | A |
5559368 | Hu et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5572040 | Reedy et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576647 | Sutardja | Nov 1996 | A |
5578853 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581106 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589793 | Kassapian | Dec 1996 | A |
5594371 | Douseki | Jan 1997 | A |
5596205 | Reedy et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597739 | Sumi et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600169 | Burgener et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600588 | Kawashima | Feb 1997 | A |
5610533 | Arimoto et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5629655 | Dent | May 1997 | A |
5663570 | Reedy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670907 | Gorecki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672992 | Nadd | Sep 1997 | A |
5677649 | Martin | Oct 1997 | A |
5681761 | Kim | Oct 1997 | A |
5689144 | Williams | Nov 1997 | A |
5694308 | Cave | Dec 1997 | A |
5698877 | Gonzalez | Dec 1997 | A |
5699018 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717356 | Kohama | Feb 1998 | A |
5729039 | Beyer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731607 | Kohama | Mar 1998 | A |
5734291 | Tasdighi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748016 | Kurosawa | May 1998 | A |
5748053 | Kameyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753955 | Fechner | May 1998 | A |
5757170 | Pinney | May 1998 | A |
5760652 | Maemura et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767549 | Chen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774411 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774792 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777530 | Nakatuka | Jul 1998 | A |
5784311 | Assaderaghi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784687 | Itoh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786617 | Merrill et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793246 | Costello et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801577 | Tailliet | Sep 1998 | A |
5804858 | Hsu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807772 | Takemura | Sep 1998 | A |
5808505 | Tsukada | Sep 1998 | A |
5812939 | Kohama | Sep 1998 | A |
5814899 | Okumura et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818099 | Burghartz | Oct 1998 | A |
5818278 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818283 | Tonami et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818289 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818766 | Song | Oct 1998 | A |
5821769 | Douseki | Oct 1998 | A |
5821800 | Le et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825227 | Kohama et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5861336 | Reedy et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863823 | Burgener | Jan 1999 | A |
5864328 | Kajimoto | Jan 1999 | A |
5874836 | Nowak et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874849 | Marotta et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877978 | Morishita et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878331 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883396 | Reedy et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883541 | Tahara et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889428 | Young | Mar 1999 | A |
5892260 | Okumura et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892382 | Ueda et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892400 | van Saders et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895957 | Reedy et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903178 | Miyatsuji et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912560 | Pasternak | Jun 1999 | A |
5917362 | Kohama | Jun 1999 | A |
5920233 | Denny | Jul 1999 | A |
5926466 | Ishida et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930605 | Mistry et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930638 | Reedy et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5945867 | Uda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5959335 | Bryant et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969560 | Kohama et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973363 | Staab et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973382 | Burgener et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973636 | Okubo et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986518 | Dougherty | Nov 1999 | A |
5990580 | Weigand | Nov 1999 | A |
6020778 | Shigehara | Feb 2000 | A |
6020781 | Fujioka | Feb 2000 | A |
6049110 | Koh | Apr 2000 | A |
6057555 | Reedy et al. | May 2000 | A |
6057723 | Yamaji et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061267 | Houston | May 2000 | A |
6064275 | Yamauchi | May 2000 | A |
6064872 | Vice | May 2000 | A |
6066993 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081165 | Goldman | Jun 2000 | A |
6081694 | Matsuura et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084255 | Ueda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6087893 | Oowaki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094088 | Yano | Jul 2000 | A |
6100564 | Bryant et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104061 | Forbes et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107885 | Miguelez et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111778 | MacDonald et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114923 | Mizutani | Sep 2000 | A |
6118343 | Winslow | Sep 2000 | A |
6122185 | Utsunomiya et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130572 | Ghilardelli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133752 | Kawagoe | Oct 2000 | A |
6160292 | Flaker et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169444 | Thurber, Jr. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172378 | Hull et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173235 | Maeda | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177826 | Mashiko et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188247 | Storino et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188590 | Chang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191449 | Shino | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191653 | Camp, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195307 | Umezawa et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201761 | Wollesen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
RE37124 | Monk et al. | Apr 2001 | E |
6215360 | Callaway, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218248 | Hwang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218890 | Yamaguchi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218892 | Soumyanath et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222394 | Allen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225866 | Kubota et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239649 | Bertin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239657 | Bauer | May 2001 | B1 |
6249027 | Burr | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249029 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249446 | Shearon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6281737 | Kuang et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288458 | Berndt | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297687 | Sugimura | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297696 | Abdollahian et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300796 | Troutman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304110 | Hirano | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308047 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310508 | Westerman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316983 | Kitamura | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320225 | Hargrove et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6337594 | Hwang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341087 | Kunikiyo | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356536 | Repke | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365488 | Liao | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380793 | Bancal et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380796 | Sakai et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6380802 | Pehike et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387739 | Smith | May 2002 | B1 |
6392440 | Nebel | May 2002 | B2 |
6392467 | Oowaki et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396325 | Goodell | May 2002 | B2 |
6396352 | Muza | May 2002 | B1 |
6400211 | Yokomizo et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407427 | Oh | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407614 | Takahashi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411531 | Nork et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414863 | Bayer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429487 | Kunikiyo | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429632 | Forbes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429723 | Hastings | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433587 | Assaderaghi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433589 | Lee | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449465 | Gailus et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452232 | Adan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461902 | Xu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466082 | Krishnan | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469568 | Toyoyama et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6486511 | Nathanson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486729 | Imamiya | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6496074 | Sowlati | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498058 | Bryant et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498370 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504212 | Allen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6504213 | Ebina | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6509799 | Franca-Neto | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512269 | Bryant et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518645 | Bae et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6518829 | Butler | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6521959 | Kim et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6537861 | Kroell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6559689 | Clark | May 2003 | B1 |
6563366 | Kohama | May 2003 | B1 |
6608785 | Chuang et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608789 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6617933 | Ito et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631505 | Arai | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6632724 | Henley et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642578 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6646305 | Assaderaghi et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653697 | Hidaka et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6677641 | Kocon | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6677803 | Chiba | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683362 | O et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684055 | Blackaby et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684065 | Bult | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6693326 | Adan | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693498 | Sasabata et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698082 | Crenshaw et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6698498 | Crenshaw et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6703863 | Gion | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6704550 | Kohama et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711397 | Petrov et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714065 | Komiya et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717458 | Potanin | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6762477 | Kunikiyo | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774701 | Heston et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781805 | Urakawa | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788130 | Pauletti et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790747 | Henley et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801076 | Merritt | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6803680 | Brindle et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804502 | Burgener et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816000 | Miyamitsu | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816001 | Khouri et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816016 | Sander et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819938 | Sahota | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825730 | Sun | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6830963 | Forbes | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6831847 | Perry | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833745 | Hausmann et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836172 | Okashita | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6870241 | Nakatani et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871059 | Piro et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6879502 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882210 | Asano et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891234 | Connelly et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6897701 | Chen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898778 | Kawanaka | May 2005 | B2 |
6903596 | Geller et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908832 | Farrens et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917258 | Kushitani et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933744 | Das et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934520 | Rozsypal | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947720 | Razavi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6969668 | Kang et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975271 | Adachi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978122 | Kawakyu et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978437 | Rittman et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7023260 | Thorp et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042245 | Hidaka | May 2006 | B2 |
7045873 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056808 | Henley et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7057472 | Kukamachi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058922 | Kawanaka | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7082293 | Rofougaran et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7088971 | Burgener et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092677 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7109532 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7123898 | Burgener et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129545 | Cain | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132873 | Hollmer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7138846 | Suwa et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7161197 | Nakatsuka et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173471 | Nakatsuka et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199635 | Nakatsuka et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202712 | Athas | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212788 | Weber et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7248120 | Burgener et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7269392 | Nakajima et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7307490 | Kizuki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7345342 | Challa | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7345521 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7355455 | Hidaka | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7391282 | Nakatsuka et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7404157 | Tanabe et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405982 | Flaker et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7432552 | Park | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7457594 | Theobold et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460852 | Burgener et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7515882 | Kelcourse et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7546089 | Bellantoni | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551036 | Berroth et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561853 | Miyazawa | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7616482 | Prall | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7659152 | Gonzalez et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7719343 | Burgener et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7733156 | Brederlow et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7733157 | Brederlow et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741869 | Hidaka | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7786807 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7796969 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7808342 | Prikhodko et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817966 | Prikhodko et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7860499 | Burgener et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7868683 | Ilkov | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7910993 | Brindle et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7928759 | Hidaka | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7960772 | Englekirk | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7982265 | Challa et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8081928 | Kelly | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8111104 | Ahadian et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8129787 | Brindle et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131225 | Botula et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8232627 | Bryant et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8299835 | Koudymov et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8334718 | Granger-Jones et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8368451 | Mulawski et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20010015461 | Ebina | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010031518 | Kim et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040479 | Zhang | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010045602 | Maeda et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020115244 | Park et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126767 | Ding et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020195623 | Horiuchi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002452 | Sahota | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032396 | Tsuchiya et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030141543 | Bryant et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030160515 | Yu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181167 | Iida | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030201494 | Maeda et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205760 | Kawanaka et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222313 | Fechner | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030224743 | Okada et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040061130 | Morizuka | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080364 | Sander et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040121745 | Meck | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040129975 | Koh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040204013 | Ma et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040242182 | Hidaka et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050077564 | Forbes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050079829 | Ogawa et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050121699 | Chen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050127442 | Veeraraghavan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050167751 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050212595 | Kusunoki et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264341 | Hikita et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009164 | Kataoka | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060077082 | Shanks | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060103448 | Nakatsuka et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060161520 | Brewer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060194558 | Kelly | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194567 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060270367 | Burgener et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070018247 | Brindle et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023833 | Okhonin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045697 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070279120 | Brederlow et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290744 | Adachi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080073719 | Fazan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080076371 | Dribinsky et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080191788 | Chen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080303080 | Bhattacharyya | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090029511 | Wu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110163779 | Hidaka | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110169550 | Brindle et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120007679 | Burgener et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
125652 | Jun 2000 | CN |
1256521 | Jun 2000 | CN |
19832565 | Aug 1999 | DE |
385641 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0385641 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0622901 | Nov 1994 | EP |
782267 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0788185 | Aug 1997 | EP |
913939 | May 1999 | EP |
625831 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1006584 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1006584 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1451890 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2348532 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2348533 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2348534 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2348535 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2348536 | Jul 2011 | EP |
2387094 | Nov 2011 | EP |
55-75348 | Jun 1980 | JP |
A-55-75348 | Jun 1980 | JP |
1-254014 | Oct 1989 | JP |
1254014 | Oct 1989 | JP |
2161769 | Jun 1990 | JP |
A-02-161769 | Jun 1990 | JP |
04-34980 | Feb 1992 | JP |
4-183008 | Jun 1992 | JP |
4183008 | Jun 1992 | JP |
5299995 | Nov 1993 | JP |
6112795 | Apr 1994 | JP |
06-314985 | Nov 1994 | JP |
06-334506 | Dec 1994 | JP |
6334506 | Dec 1994 | JP |
A-06-334506 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7046109 | Feb 1995 | JP |
07-070245 | Mar 1995 | JP |
07106937 | Apr 1995 | JP |
8023270 | Jan 1996 | JP |
8070245 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8-148949 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8148949 | Jun 1996 | JP |
11163704 | Jun 1996 | JP |
8251012 | Sep 1996 | JP |
08-307305 | Nov 1996 | JP |
A-08-307305 | Nov 1996 | JP |
8330930 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09-008621 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9008627 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9041275 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9055682 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9092785 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9148587 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9163721 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09163721 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09-200021 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9181641 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9186501 | Jul 1997 | JP |
09200021 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9200074 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9238059 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9243738 | Sep 1997 | JP |
9270659 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9284114 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9284170 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9298493 | Oct 1997 | JP |
A-09-284114 | Oct 1997 | JP |
9326642 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10079467 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10-93471 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-242477 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-242829 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10242826 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-344247 | Dec 1998 | JP |
10335901 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11026776 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11112316 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11-136111 | May 1999 | JP |
A-11-13611 | May 1999 | JP |
11163642 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11205188 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11274804 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000031167 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000183353 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000188501 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000208614 | Jul 2000 | JP |
20003713 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000243973 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000277703 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000294786 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000311986 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001007332 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001089448 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-119281 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001157487 | May 2001 | JP |
2001156182 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001274265 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2004-515937 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2004515937 | May 2002 | JP |
2000358775 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003-060451 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003060451 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003101407 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003143004 | May 2003 | JP |
2003167615 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-198248 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003189248 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003332583 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2002156602 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2004-147175 | May 2004 | JP |
2004166470 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004199950 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004288978 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2010-506156 | Dec 2012 | JP |
1994027615 | Dec 1994 | KR |
W09523460 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO9523460 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9523460 | Aug 1995 | WO |
W09806174 | Feb 1998 | WO |
W09935695 | Jul 1999 | WO |
W00227920 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0227920 | Apr 2002 | WO |
W020070008934 | Jan 2007 | WO |
W02007033045 | Mar 2007 | WO |
W02012054642 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Rodgers, et al., “Silicon UTSi CMOS RFIC for CDMA Wireless Communications Systems”, Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, 1999 IEEE MTT-S Digest. |
Megahed, et al, “Low Cost UTSI Technology for RF Wireless Applications”, Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, 1998 IEEE MTT-S Digest. |
Johnson, et al., “Advanced Thin-Film Silicon-on-Sapphire Technology: Microwave Circtuit Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 1047-1054. |
Mark L. Burgener, “CMOS SOS Switches Offer Useful Features, High Integration”, CMOS SOS Switches, Microwaves & RF, Aug. 2001, pp. 107-118. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due from the USPTO, May 12, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 10/267,531, 7 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in PTO on Aug. 12, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/267,531, 2 pgs. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Office Action from USPTO, Jun. 3105, U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,135, 8 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in PTO on Dec. 5, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,135, 7 pgs. |
Miyajima, Ikumi, Notice of Reasons for Refusal from the Japanese Patent Office dated Feb. 13, 2006 for Application No. 2003-535287, 3 pgs. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Office Action from USPTO, Jan. 17, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,135, 8 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in PTO on May 16, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,135, 4 pgs. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Notice of Allowance from USPTO, Jun. 2, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,135, 5 pgs. |
Van Der Peet, H., Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received from the EPO in related appln. No. 02 800 982.7—2220 dated Jun. 19, 2008, 3 pgs. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Office Action from USPTO dated Nov.15, 2007 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/582,206, 9 pages. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in USPTO dated May 15, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/582,206, 11 pages. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Notice of Allowance from USPTO dated Jul. 15, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/582,206, 7 pages. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Dec. 19, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/127,520, 7 pgs. |
Orndorff, et al., “CMOS/SOS/LSI Switching Regulator Control Device”, Solid-State Circuits Conf., Digest of Technical Papers, Feb. 1978 IEEE International, vol. XXI, pp. 234-235. |
Luu, An T., Office Action received from USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,342, dated Oct. 30, 2008, 11 pages. |
Caverly, Robert H., et al., “A Silicon Cmos Monolithic RF and Microwave Switching Element”, 1997 European Microwave Conference, Jerusalem, Sep. 1987, 4 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, et al., Response to Office action mailed to the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,342, dated Jan. 30, 2009, 11 pages. |
Luu, An T., Final Office Action received from USPTO, dated Apr. 8, 2009, for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,342, 14 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, et al., Proposed Amendment After Final filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 8, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. 11/351,342, 11 pgs. |
Luu, An T., Notice of Allowance received from USPTO, dated Jul.2, 2009, for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,342, 5 pgs. |
Van Der Peet, H., Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for related application No. 02 800 982.7-220 dated Aug. 6, 2009, 2 pgs. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 16, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,014, 26 pages. |
Weman, Eva, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC and Annex Form 2004 received from the European Patent Office for related appln. No. 02800982.7 ated Nov. 27, 2009, 68 pgs. |
Aquilani, Dario, Communication and Supplementary European Search Report for related European appln. No. 05763216, dated Nov. 27, 2009, 10 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, et al., Response and Terminal Disclaimers filed in the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,014, dated Mar. 16, 2010, 5 pages. |
Aquilani, Dario, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received from the EPO for related appln No. 05763216.8, dated Mar. 22, 2010, 7 pages. |
Burgener, et al, Amendment as filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 29, 2010 for related U.S. Appl No. 11/501,125, 9 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, dated Jun. 10, 2010, 11 pages. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,014, dated Apr. 29, 2010, 12 pages. |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Office Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671, dated Apr. 28, 2010, 20 pages. |
Kai, Tetsuo, an English translation of an Office Action received from the Japanese Patent Office for related appln. No. 2007-518298 dated Jul. 20, 2010, 5 pgs. |
Chow, Charles Chang, Office Action received from the USPTO for related appln. No. 11/347,671, dated Aug. 20, 2010, 18 pgs. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO for related appln. No. 12/315,395, dated Aug. 11, 2010, 26 pgs. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Supplemental Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO for related appln. No. 12/315,395, dated Oct. 29, 2010, 10 pgs. |
Kelly, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,014, dated Jul. 29, 2010, 2 pgs. |
Raab, et al., “Power Amplifiers and Transmitters for RF and Microwave”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 814-826, Mar. 2002, USA. |
Ueda, et al., “A 5GHz-Band On-Chip Matching CMOS MMIC Front-End”, 11th GAAS Symposium—Munich 2003, pp. 101-104, Germany. |
Nelson Pass, Pass Labs, “Cascode Amp Design”, Audio Electrnoics, pp. 1-4, Mar. 1978. |
Lester F. Eastman, P.I., “High Power, Broadband, Linear, Solid State Amplifier”, 16th Quarterly Rep. under Muri Contract No. N00014-96/1/1223 for period Jun. 1-Aug. 31, 2000, Sep. 2000. |
Jeon, et al., “A New ”Active“ Predistorter with High Gain Using Cascode-FET Structures”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2002, pp. 253-256. |
Hsu, et al., “Comparison of Conventional and Thermally-Stable Cascode (TSC) AlGaAs/GaAs HBTs for Microwave Power Applications”, Jrnl of Solid-State Electronics, v. 43, Sep. 1999. |
Kim, et al., “High-Performance V-Band Cascode HEMT Mixer and Downconverter Module”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 51, No. 3, p. 805-810, Mar. 2003. |
Wang, Chi-Chang, et al., “Efficiency Improvement in Charge Pump Circuits”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 852-860. |
Yamamoto, Kazuya, et al., “A 2.2-V Operation, 2.4-GHz Single-Chip GaAs MMIC Transceiver for Wireless Applications”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 4, Apr. 1999, pp. 502-512. |
Hiramoto, Toshiro, et al., “Low Power and Low Voltage MOSFETs with Variable Threshold Voltage Controlled by Back-Bias”, IEICE Trans. Electron, vol. E83-C, No. 2, Feb. 2000, pp. 161-169. |
Su, Pin, et al., “On the Body-Source Built-In Potential Lowering of SOI MOSFETs”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 24, No. 2, Feb. 2003, pp. 90-92. |
Yang, Min, “Sub-100nm Vertical MOSFET's with Si1-x-y GexCy Source/Drains”, a dissertation presented to the faculty of Princeton University, Jun. 2000, 272 pgs. |
Ytterdal, T., et al., “MOSFET Device Physics and Operation”, Device Modeling for Analog and RF CMOS Circuit Design, 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 46 pgs. |
Cherne, et al., U.S. Statutory Invention Registration No. H1435, published May 2, 1995. |
Hsu, et al., “Comparison of Conventional and Thermally-Stable Cascode (TSC) AIGaAs1GaAs HBTs for Microwave Power Applications”, Jrnl of Solid-State Electronics, V. 43, 9/1999 |
Mishra, et al., “High Power Broadband Amplifiers for 1-18 GHz Naval Radar” University of California, Santa Barbara, pp. 1-9, Jul. 1, 1998. |
Perraud, et al., “A Direct-Conversion CMOS Transceiver for the 802.11a/b/g WLAN Standard Utilizing a Cartesian Feedback Transmitter”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, No. 12, Dec. 2004, pp. 2226-2238. |
Rohde, et al., “Optic/Millimeter-Wave Converter for 60 Ghz Radio-Over-Fiber Systems”, Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Festkörperphysik Freiburg i. Br., Apr. 1997, pp. 1-5. |
Darabi, et al. “A Dual-Mode 802.11b/Bluetooth Radio in 0.35-•m CMOS”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 40, No. 3, Mar. 2005, pp. 698-706. |
Schlechtweg, et al., “Multifunctional Integration Using HEMT Technology”, Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Solid State Physics, (date uncertain, believed Mar. 1997). |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 2, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671, 14 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, Amendment filed in the USPTO dated May 2, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671, 6 pgs. |
Nguyen, Patricia T., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 25, 2005 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,405, 7 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in USPTO dated Jan. 25, 2006 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,405, 11 pgs. |
Nguyen, Patricia, Office Action received from USPTO dated Apr. 20, 2006 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,405, 10 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in USPTO dated Aug. 21, 2006 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,405, 10 pgs. |
Ngyuen, Patricia, Notice of Allowance received from USPTO dated Sep.27, 2006 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,405, 5 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance dated Dec. 26, 2006 for related U.S. Appl. No. 10/875,405, 2 pgs. |
Le, Lana N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Sep. for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,597, 10 pgs. |
Le, Lana, International Search Report received from USPTO dated Nov. 15, 2005 for related PCT appln. No. PCT/US2005/022407, 10 pgs. |
Le, Lana N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 27, 2006 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,597, 8 pgs. |
Dinh, Le T., International Search Report received from USPTO dated Mar. 28, 2003 for related application No. PCT/US02/32266, 2 pgs. |
Tieu, Binh Kien, Notice of Allowance received from USPTO dated May 1, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No.. 10/267,531, now Pat. No. 6,804,502, 8 pgs. |
Huang, “A 0.5 um CMOS T/R Switch for 900-MHz Wireless Application”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 36, No. 3, Mar. 2001, pp. 486-492. |
Lauterbach, et al. “Charge Sharing Concept and New Clocking Scheme for Power Efficiency and Electromagnetic Emission Improvement of Boosted Charge Pumps”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 5, May 2000, pp. 719-723. |
Makioka, et al., “Super Self-Aligned GaAs RF Switch IC with 0.25 dB Extremely Low Insertion Loss for Mobile Communication Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 48, No. 8, Aug. 2001, pp. 1510-1514. |
Maxim Integrated Products, “Charge Pumps Shine in Portable Designs”, published Mar. 15, 2001, pp. 1-16. |
Texas Instruments, “TPS60204, TPS60205, Regulated 3.3-V, 100-mA Low-Ripple Charge Pump Low Power DC/DC Converters”, published 212001, rev. Sep. 2001, pp. 1-18. |
Nork, Sam, “New Charge Pumps Offer Low Input and Output Noise” Linear Technology Corporation, Design Notes, Design Note 243, published Nov. 2000, pp. 1-2. |
Linear Technology, “LTC1550L/LTC1551L: Low Noise Charge Pump Inverters in MS8 Shrink Cell Phone Designs”, published Dec. 1998, pp. 1-2. |
Lascari, Lance, “Accurate Phase Noise Prediction in Pll Synthesizers” Applied Microwave & Wireless, published May 2000, pp. 90-96. |
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 19, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 17 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 19, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 5 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 29, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 19 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Response (in Japanese) as filed in the Japanese Patent Office for related appln. No. 2007-518298 dated Oct. 15, 2010, 45 pages, plus translation of Response as filed dated Oct. 12, 2010, 10 pages. |
Kai, Tetsuo, Translation of an Office Action received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Mar. 29, 2011 for related Japanese appln. No. 2010-232563, 4 pgs. |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Office Action received from USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Aug. 19, 2008, 14 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, Amendment filed in the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Dec. 19, 2008, 15 pgs. |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Office Action received from USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Apr. 16, 2009, 16 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, Response filed in the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Jun. 16, 2009, 14 pgs. |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Office Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Jul. 20, 2009, 17 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, Amendment filed in the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Jan. 20,2010, 18 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, Amendment filed in the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Jul. 28, 2010, 6 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, Amendment filed in the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Dec. 20, 2010, 12 pgs. |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Office Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Mar. 2, 2011, 15 pgs. |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Advisory Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated May 12, 2011, 3 pgs. |
Shifrin, Mitchell, “Monolithic FET Structures for High-Power Control Component Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 37, No. 12, Dec. 1989, pp. 2134-2141. |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Office Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671 dated Apr. 20, 2010, 20 pgs. |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Office Action received from the USPTO for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671, dated Aug. 20, 2010, 18 pgs. |
Kelly, Dylan, Notice of Appeal filed in USPTO dated Jun. 2, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671, 6 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, a Response (in Japanese), dated Aug. 14, 2006, for related Japanese application No. 2003-535287, 32 pgs. |
Miyajima, Ikumi, translation of Notice of Reasons for Refusal, dated Oct. 5, 2006 for related Japanese application No. 2003-535287, 4 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO, dated Dec. 23, 2008 for related application No. 02 800 9821-2220, 22 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO, dated Oct. 7, 2009 for related application No. 02 800 9821-2220, 23 pgs. |
Chow, Charles Chiang, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 6, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,671, 12 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 6, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 11 pgs. |
Unterberger, Michael, Extended European Search Report received from the EPO dated Sep. 30, 2011 for related appin. No. 10011669.8-2220, 9 pgs. |
Weman, Eva, Communication of a notice of opposition received from the EPO dated Nov. 8, 2011 for related appln No. 028000982.7-2220, 33 pgs. |
Caverly, Robert H., “Linear and Nonlinear Characteristics of the Silicon CMOS Monolithic 50-Ω Microwave and RF Control Element”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 124-126. |
Philips Semiconductors, Product Specificate, IC17 Data Handbook, Nov. 7, 1997, pp. 1-14. |
Iyama, Yoshitada, et al., “L-Bank SPDT Switch Using Si-MOSFET”, IEICE Trans. Electronic, vol. E-79-C, No. 5, May 1996, pp. 636-643. |
Yamamoto, Kazuya, et al., “A 2.2-V Operating, 2.4-GHz Single-Chip GaAs MMIC Transceiver for Wireless Applications”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 4, Apr. 1999, pp. 502-512. |
Patel, Reema, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 5, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/046,560, 13 pgs. |
Trans, Pablo N., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Feb. 3, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 46 pgs. |
Hoffmann, Niels, Office Action received from the EPO dated Feb. 4, 2009 for related appln. No. 06786943.8, 104 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Aug. 12, 2009 for related appln. No. 06786943.8, 31 pgs. |
Hoffmann, Niels, Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC dated Jul. 22, 2011 for related appln. No. 06786943.8, 8 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Oct. 24, 2011 for related appln. No. 06786943.8, 1 pg. |
Benker, Guido, Decision to Refulse a European Patent Application (Art. 97(2)EPC) dated Nov. 11, 2011 or related appln. No. 06786943.8, 4 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Jan. 17, 2012 for related appln. No. 06786943.8, 1 pg. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Appeal to the Decision for Refusal filed in the EPO dated Mar. 20, 2012 for related appln. No. 06786943.8, 27 pgs. |
Brindle, et al., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 17, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,211, 41 pgs. |
Hoffmann, Niels, International Search Report received from the EPO dated Feb. 27, 2012 for related appln. No. PCT/ US2011/056942, 12 pgs. |
Iljirna, et al., “Boosted Voltage Scheme with Active Body-Biasing Control on PD-SOI for Ultra Low Voltage Operation”, IEICE Transactions on Electronics, Institute of Electronics, Tokyo, JP, vol. E90C, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2007, pp. 666-674. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Translation of a Response filed in the Chinese Patent Office dated Nov. 30, 2009 for related appln. No. 200680025128.7, 3 pgs. |
Chinese Patent Office, Translation of an Office Action received from the Chinese Patent Office dated Nov. 2, 2011 for related appln. No. 2006800251281, 12 pgs. |
Shingleton, Michael, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 7, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,816, 4 pgs. |
Dribinsky, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 7, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816, 7 pgs. |
Shingleton, Michael, Office Communication received from the USPTO dated Apr. 28, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,816, 3 pgs. |
Dribinsky, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Aug.28, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816, 7 pgs. |
Shingleton, Michael, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 19, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,816, 16 pgs. |
Dribinsky, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 19, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816, 22 pgs. |
Shingleton, Michael, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Oct. 14, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,816, 15 pgs. |
Dribinsky, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 14, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816, 19 pgs. |
Shingleton, Michael, Advisory Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 11, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,816, 3 pgs. |
Shingleton, Michael, Interview Summary received from the USPTO dated Apr. 12, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,816, 2 pgs. |
Shingleton, Michael, Interview Summary received from the Uspto dated Apr. 12, 2011 for related U.S Appl. No. 11/811,816, 3 pgs. |
Dribinsky, et al., General Letter filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 29, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816, 1 pg. |
Shingleton, Michael, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 12, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/811,816, 5 pgs. |
Dribinsky, et al., RCE and IDS filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 26, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816, 4 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert Mark, Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 5, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/046,560, 4 pgs. |
Nguyen, Tram Hoang, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 11, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,529, 6 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated Apr. 17, 2012 for related appln. No. EP1451890, 42 pgs. |
F. Hameau and 0. Rozeau, “Radio-Frequency Circuits Integration Using CMOS SOI 0.25pm Technology”, 2002 RF IC Design Workshop Europe, Mar. 19-22, 2002, Grenoble, France. |
O. Rozeau et al., “SOI Technologies Overview for Low-Power Low-Voltage Radio-Frequency Applications,” Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 25, pp. 93-114, Boston, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Nov. 2000. |
C. Tinella et al., “A High-Performance CMOS-SOI Antenna Switch for the 2.55-GHz Band, ”IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, No. 7, Jul., 2003. |
H. Lee et al., “Analysis of body bias effect with PD-SOI for analog and RF applications,” Solid State Electron., vol. 46, pp. 1169-1176, 2002. |
J.-H. Lee, et al., “Effect of Body Structure on Analog Performance of SOI NMOSFETs,” Proceedings, 1998 IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 5-8, 1998, pp. 61-62. |
C. F. Edwards, et al., The Effect of Body Contact Series Resistance on Soi Cmos Amplifier Stages, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 12, Dec. 1997 pp. 2290-2294. |
S. Maeda, et al., Substrate-bias Effect and Source-drain Breakdown Characteristics in Body-tied Short-channel SOI MOSFETs, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 46, No. 1, Jan. 1999 pp. 151-158. |
F. Assaderaghi, et al., “Dynamic Threshold-voltage MOSFET (DTMOS) for Ultra-low Voltage VLSI,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 414-422. |
G. O. Workman and J. G. Fossum, “A Comparative Analysis of the Dynamic Behavior of BTG/SOI MOSFETs and Circuits with Distributed Body Resistance,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 10, Oct. 1998 pp. 2138-2145. |
T.-S. Chao, et al. “High-voltage and High-temperature Applications of DTMOS with Reverse Schottky Barrier on Substrate Contacts,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 2, Feb. 2004, pp. 86-88. |
Kuang, et al., “SRAM Bitline Circuits on PD SOI: Advantages and Concerns”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 1997. |
Chung, et al., “SOI MOSFET Structure with a Junction-Type Body Contact for Suppression of Pass Gate Leakage”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 48, No. 7, Jul. 2001. |
Lee, et al., “Effects of Gate Structures on the RF Performance in PD SOI MOSFETs”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 15, No. 4, Apr. 2005. |
Hirano, et al., “Impact of Actively Body-bias Controlled (ABC) SOI Sram by using Direct Body Contact Technology for Low-Voltage Application” IEEE, 2003, pp. 2.4.1-2.4.4. |
Lee, et al., “Harmonic Distortion Due to Narrow Width Effects in Deep sub-micron SOI-CMOS Device for analog-RF applications”, 2002 IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 2002. |
Kuo, et al., “Low-Voltage SOI CMOS VLSI Devices and Circuits”, 2001, Wiley Interscience, New York, XP001090589, pp. 57-60 and 349-354. |
Chinese Patent Office, translation of an Office Action received from the Chinese Patent Office dated Jul. 31, 2009 for related appln. No. 200680025128.7, 3 pgs. |
Brindle, Chris, et al, Translation of a Response filed in the Chinese Patent Office dated Nov. 11, 2009 for related appln. No. 200680025128.7, 3 pgs. |
Sedra, Adel A., et al., “Microelectronic Circuits”, Fourth Edition, University of Toronto, Oxford University Press, 1982, 1987, 1991 and 1998, pgs. 374-375. |
Bolam, et al., “Reliability Issues for Silicon-on-Insulator”, IBM Microelectronics Division, IEEE 2000, pp. 6.4.1-6.4.4. |
Hu, et al., “A Unified Gate Oxide Reliability Model”, IEEE 37th Annual International Reliability Physics Symposium, San Diego, CA 1999, pp. 47-51. |
Nguyen, Tram Hoang, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 19, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/484,370, 7 pgs. |
Brindle, Christopher, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 20, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/484,370, 7 pgs. |
Nguyen, Tram Hoang, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 23, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/484,370, 11 pgs. |
Brindle, Christopher, Response filed in the USPTO dated Aug. 24, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/484,370, 8 pgs. |
Nguyen, Tram Hoang, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jan. 6, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/484,370, 46 pgs. |
Brindle, Christopher, Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jul. 6, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/484,370, 32 pgs. |
Nguyen, Tram Hoang, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 12, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/484,370, 21 pgs. |
Iperione, Analia, International Search Report received from the EPO dated Jul. 11, 2006 for related appln. No. PCT/ US2006/026965, 19 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 16,2011 for related appln. No. 11153313.9, 8 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 16, 20111 for related appln. No. 11153281.8, 7 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 16, 2011 for related appln. No. 11153241.2, 5 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 16, 2011 for related appln. No. 11153247.9, 6 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 16, 2011 for related appln. No. 11153227.1, 5 pgs. |
Kurisu, Masakazu, Japanese Office Action received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Apr. 17, 2012 for related appin. No. 2010-506156, 4 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 15, 2012 for related appln. No. 10011669.8, 19 pgs. |
Patel, Reema, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated May 24, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/046,560, 15 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated May 19, 2011 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125, 11 pgs. |
“An Ultra-Thin Silicon Technology that Provides Integration Solutions on Standard CMOS”, Peregrine Semiconductor, 1998. |
Caverly, “Distortion in Microwave Control Devices”, 1997. |
Masuda, et al., “RF Current Evaluation of ICs by Mp-10L”, NEC Research & Development, vol. 40-41, 1999, pgs. 253-258. |
“Miniature Dual Control SP4T Switches for Low Cost Multiplexing”, Hittite Microwave, 1995. |
Uda, “Miniturization and High Isolation of a GaAs SPDT Switch IC Mounted in Plastic Package”, 1996. |
Marshall, et al., “SOI Design: Analog, Memory, and Digital Techniques”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. |
Bernstein, et al., “SOI Circuit Design Concepts”, Springer Science +Business Media, 2000. |
Brinkman, et al., Respondents' Notice of Prior Art, Investigation No. 337-TA-848, dated Aug. 31, 2012, 59 pgs. |
Caverly, “Development of a CMOS Cell Library for RF Wireless and Telecommunications Applications”, VLSI Symposium, 1998. |
Caverly, “Distortion Properties of Gallium Arsenide and Silicon RF and Microwave Switches”, IEEE, 1997, pp. 153-156. |
Luu, Final Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 2009 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,342. |
Colinge, “Fully Depleted SOI CMOS for Analog Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1998, pp. 1010-1016. |
Flandre, et al., “Fully Depleted SOI CMOS Technology for Low Voltage Low Power Mixed Digital/Analog/Microwave Circuits”, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 1999, pp. 213-228. |
Yamao, “GaAs Broadband Monolithic Switches”, 1986, pp. 63-71. |
Gopinath, et al., “GaAs FET RF Switches”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1985, pp. 1272-1278. |
Lee, et al., “Harmonic Distortion Due to Narrow Width Effects in Deep Submicron SOI-CMOS Device for Analog RF Applications”, 2002 IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 2002. |
HI-5042 thru HI-5051 Datasheet, Harris Corporation, 1999. |
Eisenberg, et al., “High Isolation 1-20GHz MMIC Switches with On-Chip Drivers”, IEEE Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium, 1989, pp. 41-45. |
Shifrin et al., “High Power Control Components Using a New Monolithic FET Structure”, IEEE Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium, 1988, pp. 51-56. |
Kohama, et al., “High Power DPDT Antenna Switch MMIC for Digital Cellular Systems”, GaAs IC Symposium, 1995, pp. 75-78. |
Kohama, et al., “High Power DPDT Antenna Switch MMIC for Digital Cellular Systems”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 1996, pp. 1406-1411. |
Yun, et al., “High Power-GaAs MMIC Switches wtih Planar Semi-Insulated Gate FETs (SIGFETs)”, International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & ICs, 1990, pp. 55-58. |
Caverly, “High Power Gallium Nitride Devices for Microwave and RF Control Applications”, 1999, pp. 1-30. |
Caverly, “High Power Gallium Nitride Devices for Microwave and RF Control Applications”, 2000, pp. 1-33. |
Masuda, et al., “High Power Heterojunction GaAs Switch IC with P-1dB of more than 38dBm for GSM Application”, IEEE, 1998, pp. 229-232. |
De Boer, et al., “Highly Integrated X-Band Multi-Function MMIC with Integrated LNA and Driver Amplifier”, TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory, 2002, pp. 1-4. |
Kanda, et al., “High Performance 19GHz Band GaAs FET Switches Using LOXI (Layerd Oxide Isolation)—MESFETs”, IEEE, 1997, pp. 62-65. |
Uda, et al., “High-Performance GaAs Switch IC's Fabricated Using MESFET's with Two Kinds of Pinch-Off Voltages and a Symmetrical Pattern Configuration”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 29, No. 10, Oct., 1994, pp. 1262-1269. |
Uda, et al., “High Performance GaAs Switch IC's Fabricated Using MESFETs with Two Kinds of Pinch Off Voltages”, IEEE GaAs IC Symposium, 1993, pp. 247-250. |
Armijos, “High Speed DMOS FET Analog Switches and Switch Arrays”, Temic Semiconductors 1994, pp. 1-10. |
Katzin, et al., “High Speed 100+W RF Switches Using GaAs MMICs”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 1992, pp. 1989-1996. |
Honeywell, “Honeywell Spdt Absorptive RF Switch”, Honeywell, 2002, pp. 1-6. |
Honeywell, “Honeywell SPDT Reflective RF Switch”, Honeywell Advance Information, 2001, pp. 1-3. |
Hirano, et al., “Impact of Actively Body Bias Controlled (ABC) SOI SRAM by Using Direct Body Contact Technology for Low Voltage Application”, IEEE, 2003, pp. 2.4.1-2.4.4. |
Larson, “Integrated Circuit Technology Options for RFIC's—Present Status and Future Directions”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 1998, pp. 387-399. |
Burghartz, “Integrated RF and Microwave Components in BiCMOS Technology”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1996, pp. 1559-1570. |
Kelly, “Integrated Ultra CMIS Designs in GSM Front End”, Wireless Design Magazine, 2004, pp. 18-22. |
Bonkowski, et al., “Integraton of Triple Band GSM Antenna Switch Module Using SOI CMOS”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2004, pp. 511-514. |
Le, International Search Report from the USPTO dated Mar. 2003 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 10/267,531. |
Marenk, et al., “Layout Optimization of Cascode RF SOI Transistors”, IEEE International SOI Conference, 2001, pp. 105-106. |
Suematsu, et al., “L-Band Internally Matched Si-MMIC Front End”, IEEE, 1996, pp. 2375-2378. |
Iyama, et al., “L-Band SPDT Switch Using Si-MOSFET”, IEICE Trans. Electron, vol. E79-C, No. 5, May 1996, pp. 636-643. |
Caverly, “Linear and Nonlinear Characteristics of the Silicon CMOS Monolithic 50-Omega Microwave and RF Control Element”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 1999, pp. 124-126. |
Adan, et al., “Linearity and Low Noise Performance of SOIMOSFETs for RF Applications”, IEEE International SOI Conference, 2000, pp. 30-31. |
Megahed, et al., “Low Cost UTSi Technology for RF Wireless Applications”, IEEE MTT-S Digest, 1998. |
Suehle, et al., “Low Electric Field Breakdown of Thin Si02 Films Under Static and Dynamic Stress”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 5, May 1997. |
Newman, “Radiation Hardened Power Electronics”, Intersil Corporation, 1999, pp. 1-4. |
Kelly, Response and Terminal Disclaimer filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 2010 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 11/347,014. |
Burgener, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated May 2006 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,135. |
Kelly, Response to Office Action mailed to USPTO relating to U.S. Appl. No. 11/351,342 dated Jan. 30, 2009. |
“RF & Microwave Device Overview 2003—Silicon and GaAs Semiconductors”, NEC, 2003. |
“RF Amplifier Design Using HFA3046, HFA3096, HFA3127, HFA3128 Transistor Arrays”, Intersil Corporation, 1996, pp. 1-4. |
“SA630 Single Pole Double Throw (SPDT) Switch”, Philips Semiconductors, 1997. |
Narendra, et al., “Scaling of Stack Effects and its Application for Leakage Reduction”, ISLPED 2001, 2001, pp. 195-200. |
Huang, “Schottky Clamped MOS Transistors for Wireless CMOS Radio Frequency Switch Application”, University of Florida, 2001, pp. 1-167. |
Botto, et al., “Series Connected Soft Switched IGBTs for High Power, High Voltage Drives Applications: Experimental Results”, IEEE, 1997, pp. 3-7. |
Baker, et al., “Series Operation of Power MOSFETs for High Speed Voltage Switching Applications”, American Institute of Physics, 1993, pp. 1655-1656. |
Lovelace, et al., “Silicon MOSFET Technology for RF ICs”, IEEE, 1995, pp. 1238-1241. |
RODGERs, et al., “Silicon UTSi CMOS RFIC for CDMA Wireless Communications System”, IEEE MTT-S Digest, 1999, pp. 485-488. |
“Silicon Wave SiW1502 Radio Modem IC”, Silicon Wave, 2000, pp. 1-21. |
Johnson, et al., “Silicon-On-Sapphire MOSFET Transmit/Receive Switch for L and S Band Transceiver Applications”, Electronic Letters, 1997, pp. 1324-1326. |
Reedy, et al., “Single Chip Wireless Systems Using SOI”, IEEE International SOI Conference, 1999, pp. 8-11. |
Stuber, et al., “SOI CMOS with High Performance Passive Components for Analog, RF and Mixed Signal Designs”, IEEE International SOI Conference, 1998, pp. 99-100. |
Chung, et al., “SOI MOSFET Structure with a Junction Type Body Contact for Suppression of Pass Gate Leakage”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 48, No. 7, Jul. 2001. |
Rozeau, “SOI Technologies Overview for Low Power Low Voltage Radio Frequency Applications”, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Nov. 2000, pp. 93-114. |
Fukuda, et al., “SOI CMOS Device Technology”, Special Edition on 21st Century Solutions, 2001, pp. 54-57. |
Fukuda, et al., “SOI CMOS Device Technology”, OKI Technical Review, 2001, pp. 54-57. |
Kusunoki, et al., “SPDT Switch MMIC Using E/D Mode GaAs JFETs for Personal Communications”, IEEE GaAs IC Symposium, 1992, pp. 135-138. |
Caverly, et al., “SPICE Modeling of Microwave and RF Control Diodes”, IEEE, 2000, pp. 28-31. |
Kuang, et al., “SRAM Bitline Circuits on PD SOI: Advantages and Concerns”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 1997. |
Baker, et al., “Stacking Power MOSFETs for Use in High Speed Instrumentation”, American Institute of Physics, 1992, pp. 5799-5801. |
Sanders, “Statistical Modeling of SOI Devices for the Low Power Electronics Program”, AET, Inc., 1995, pp. 1-109. |
Maeda, et al., “Substrate Bias Effect and Source Drain Breakdown Characteristics in Body Tied Short Channel SOI MOSFETs”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 46, No. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 151-158. |
Makioka, et al., “Super Self Aligned GaAs RF Switch IC with 0.25dB Extremely Low Insertion Loss for Mobile Communication Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 48, No. 8, Aug. 2001, pp. 1510-1514. |
Karandikar, et al., “Technology Mapping for SOI Domino Logic Incorporating Solutions for the Parasitic Bipolar Effect”, ACM, 2001, pp. 1-14. |
Huang, et al., “TFSOI Can It Meet the Challenge of Single Chip Portable Wireless Systems”, IEEE International SOI Conference, 1997, pp. 1-3. |
Devlin, “The Design of Integrated Switches and Phase Shifters”, 1999. |
Edwards, et al., “The Effect of Body Contact Series Resistance on SOI CMOS Amplifier Stages”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 12, Dec. 1997, pp. 2290-2294. |
Hess, et al., “Transformerless Capacitive Coupling of Gate Signals for Series Operation of Power MOS Devices”, IEEE, 1999, pp. 673-675. |
Sleight, et al., “Transient Measurements of SOI Body Contact Effectiveness”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 19, No. 12, Dec. 1998. |
“uPG13xG Series L-Band SPDT Switch GaAs MMIC”, NEC, 1996, pp. 1-30. |
Reedy, et al., “UTSi CMOS: A Complete RF SOI Solution”, Peregrine Semiconductor, 2001, pp. 1-6. |
Hittite Microwave, “Wireless Symposium 2000 is Stage for New Product Introductions”, Hittite Microwave, 2000, pp. 1-8. |
Montoriol, et al., “3.6V and 4.8V Gsm/DCS1800 Dual Band PA Application with DECT Capability Using Standard Motorola RFICs”, 2000, pp. 1-20. |
Wang, et al., “Efficiency Improvement in Charge Pump Circuits”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 852-860. |
Gibson, “The Communication Handbook”, CRC Press, 1997. |
Hanzo, “Adaptive Wireless Transceivers”, Wiley, 2002. |
Itoh, “RF Technologies for Low Power Wireless Communications”, Wiley, 2001. |
Lossee, “RF Systems, Components, and Circuits Handbook”, Artech House, 1997. |
Miller, “Modern Electronic Communications”, Prentice-Hall, 1999. |
Minoli, “Telecommunications Technology Handbook”, Artech House, 2003. |
Morreale, “The CRC Handbook of Modern Telecommunication”, CRC Press, 2001. |
Sayre, “Complete Wireless Design”, McGraw-Hill, 2001. |
Schaper, “Communications, Computations, Control, and Signal Processing”, Kluwer Academic, 1997. |
Shafi, “Wireless Communications in the 21st Century”, Wiley, 2002. |
Willert-Porata, M, Advanced in Microwave and Radio Frequency Processing, 8th International Conference on Microwave and High-Frequency Heating, Oct. 2009. |
Tran, Pablo, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 26, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 14 pgs. |
Stuber, et al., Supplemental Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Nov. 8, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/028,144, 17 pgs. |
Patel, Reema, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Dec. 3, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/046,560, 9 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 18, 2012 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,463, 6 pgs. |
Aquilani, Dario, Communication pursuant to Articl 94(3) EPC dated Jan. 21, 2013 for related appln. No. 05763216.8, 4 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Reply filed in the EPO dated Jul. 29, 2013 or related appln. No. 05763216.8, 17 pgs. |
Dang, Hung Q., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jan. 25, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/735,954, 42 pgs. |
Brosa, Anna-Maria, European Search Report received from the EPO dated Feb. 1, 2013 for related appln. No. 12194187.6. 10 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 15, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 26 pgs. |
Patel, Reema, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 15, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/046,560, 10 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated May 16, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,848, 101 pgs. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated May 20, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,463, 6 pgs. |
Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation, Response filed in the EPO dated May 23, 2013 for related appln. No. 09174085.2, 16 pgs. |
Tran, Pablo N., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jun. 6, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/412,463, 142 pgs. |
Englekirk, Robert, Part B—Fee(s) Transmittal and Comments on Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 17, 2013 for related U.S. Appl. No. 13/046,560, 4 pgs. |
Fuse, et al., “A 0.5V 200MHz 1-Stage 32b ALU Using a Body Bias Controlled SOI Pass-Gate Logic”, IEEE Int'l Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 1997. |
Douseki, et al., “A 0.5-V MTCMOS/SIMOX Logic Gate”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 10, Oct. 1997. |
Douseki, et al., “A 0.5v SIMOX-MTMCOS Circuit with 200ps Logic Gate”, IEEE Intl Solid-State Circuits Conference, 1996, pp. 84-85, 423. |
Shimomura, et al., “A 1-V 46-ns 16-mb SOI-DRAM with Body Control Technique”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 11, Nov. 1997, pp. 1712-1720. |
Ueda, et al., “A CAD Compatible SOI/CMOS Gate Array Having Body Fixed Partially Depleted Transistors”, IEEE Int'l Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 8, 1997, pp. 288-289. |
Workman, et al., “A Comparative Analysis of the Dynamic Behavior of BTG/SO1 MOSFETs and Circuits with Distributed Body Resistance”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 10, Oct. 1998, pp. 2138-2145. |
Kuang, et al., “A Dynamic Body Discharge Technique for SOI Circuit Applications”, IEEE Int'l SOI Conference, Oct. 1999, pp. 77-78. |
Assaderaghi, et al., “A Dynamic Threshold Voltage MOSFT (DTMOS) for Ultra-Low Voltage Operation”, Int'l Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 1994, pp. 809-812. |
Kuang, et al., “A Floating-Body Charge Monitoring Technique for Partially Depleted SOI Technology”, Int'l Journal of Electronics, vol. 91, No. 11, Nov. 2004, pp. 625-637. |
Gil, et al., “A High Speed and Low Power SOI Inverter Using Active Body-Bias”, Proceedings Int'l Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, Aug. 1998, pp. 59-63. |
Gil, et al., “A High Speed and Low Power Soi Inverter Using Active Body-Bias”, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 43, 1999, pp. 791-799. |
Kuang, et al., “A High-Performance Body-Charge-Modulated Soi Sense Amplifier”, IEEE Intl SOI Conference, Oct. 2000, pp. 100-101. |
Tinella, et al. “A High-Performance CMOS-SOI Antenna Switch for the 2.5 5GHz Band”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State . Circuits, vol. 38, No. 7, Jul. 2003, All pgs. |
Chung, et al., “A New SOI Inverter for Low Power Applications”, IEEE SOI Conference, Oct. 1996, pp. 20-21. |
Chung, et al., “A New SOI Inverter Using Dynamic Threshold for Low-Power Applications”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 248-250. |
Chung, et al., “A New SOI MOSFET Structure with Junction Type Body Contact”, Int'l Electron Device Meeting (IEDM) Technical Digest, 1999, pp. 59-62. |
Terauchi, et al., “A Novel 4T SRAM Cell Using “Self-Body-Biased” SOI MOSFET Structure Operating at 0.5 Volt”, IEEE Int'l SOI Conference, Oct. 2000, pp. 108-109. |
Wang, et all., “A Novel Low-Voltage Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) CMOS Complementary Pass-Transistor Logic (CPL) Circuit Using Asymmetrical Dynamic Threshold Pass-Transistor (ADTPT) Technique”, Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Aug. 2000, pp. 694-697. |
Das, et al., “A Novel Sub-1 V High Speed Circuit Design Technique in Partially Depleted SOI-CMOS Technology with Ultra Low Leakage Power”, Proceedings of the 28th European Solid-State Circuits Conference, Sep. 2002, pp. 24-26. |
Das, et al., “A Novel Sub-1 V High Speed Circuit Design Technique in Partially Depleted SOI-CMOS Technology with Ultra Low Leakage Power”, Proceedings of the 28th European Solid-State Circuits Conference, Sep. 2002, pp. 267-270. |
Kanda, et al., “A Si RF Switch MMIC for the Cellular Frequency Band Using SOI-CMOS Technology”, Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers Technical Report, vol. 100, No. 152, Jun. 2000, pp. 79-83. |
Hu, et al., “A Unified Gate Oxide Reliability Model”, IEEE 37th Annual Int'l Reliability Physics Symposium, 1999, pp. 47-51, San Diego, California. |
Nakatani, “A Wide Dynamic Range Switched-LNA in SiGe BICMOS”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2001, pp. 223-226. |
Tseng, et al., “AC Floating-Body Effects and the Resultant Analog Circuit Issues in Submicron Floating body and Body-Grounded SOI MOSFET's”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 46, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. All. |
Tseng, et al., “AC Floating-Body Effects in Submicron Fully Depleted (FD) SOI nMOSFET's and the Impact on Analog Applications”, IEEE Electron Devices, vol. 19, No. 9, Sep. 1998, pp. 351-353. |
Wada, et al., “Active Body-Bias SOI-CMOS Driver Circuits”, Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, 1997, pp. 29-30. |
Stuber, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 10, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/520,912, 28 pgs. |
Saccamango, et al., “An SOI Floating Body Charge Monitor Technique”, IEEE Int'l 501 Conference, Oct. 2000, pp. 88-89. |
Lee, et al., “Analysis of Body Bias Effect with PD-SOI or Analog and Re Applications”, Solid State Electron, vol. 46, 2002, pp. 1169-1176. |
Dunga, “Analysis of Floating Body Effects in Thin Film SOI Mosfet's Using the GIDL Current Technique”, Proceedings of the 8th Int'l Symposium on Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, 2001, pp. 254-257. |
Gautier, et al., “Body Charge Related Transient Effects in Floating Body SOI NMOSEETs”, IEDM Tech. Digest, 1995, pp. 623-626. |
Koh, et al., “Body-Contracted SOI MOSFET Structure and its Application to DRAM”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 1063-1070. |
Koh, et al., “Body-Contacted SOI MOSFET Structure with Fully Bulk CMOS Compatible Layout and Process”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 102-104. |
Tseng, et al., “Characterization of Floating Body and Body-Grounded Thin Film Silicon-on-Insulator MOSFETs for Analog Circuit Applications”, Ph.D. Thesis, UCLA, 1999, pp. All. |
Madihian, et al., “CMOS RF ICs for 900MHz-2.4GHz Band Wireless Communication Networks”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 1999, pp. 13-16. |
Orndorff, et al., “CMOS/SOS/LSI Switching Regulator Control Device”, IEEE Int'l Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 78, Feb. 1978, pp. 234-235, 282. |
Eschenbach, Communication from the EPO dated Feb. 4, 2009 for related appln. No. 06786943.8, 101 pgs. |
Shingleton, Communication from the USPTO dated Apr. 28, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816, 3 pgs. |
Sudhama, et al., “Compact Modeling and Circuit Impact of a Novel Frequency Dependence of Capacitance in RF MOSFETs”, Nano Science and Technology Institute, Technical Proceedings of the 2001 Int'l Conference of Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems. 2001. |
Casu, et al., “Comparative Analysis of PD-SOI Active Body-Biasing Circuits”, IEEE Int'l SOI Conference, Oct. 2000, pp. 94-95. |
Cho, et al., “Comparative Assessment of Adaptive Body-Bias SOI Pass-Transistor Logic”, Fourth Int'l Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, Mar. 2003, pp. 55-60. |
Chan, et al., “Comparative Study of Fully Depleted and Body-Grounded Non Fully Depleted SOI MOSFET's for High Performance Analog and Mixed Signal Circuits”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 42, No. 11, Nov. 1995, pp. 1975-1981. |
Tseng, et al. “Comprehensive Study on AC Characteristics in SOI MOSFETs for Analog Applications”, 1998 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, Jun. 1998. |
Pelella, et al., “Control of Off-State Current in Scaled PD/SOI CMOS Digital Circuits”, Proceedings IEEE Int'l Soi Conference, Oct. 1998, pp. 147-148. |
Assaderaghi, “DTMOS: Its Derivatives and Variations, and Their Potential Applications”, the 12th Int'l Conference on Microelectronics, Nov. 2000, pp. 9-10. |
Lindert, et al. “Dynamic Threshold Pass-Transistor Logic for Improved Delay at Lower Power Supply Voltages”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 85-89. |
Drake, et al., “Dynamic-Threshold Logic for Low Power VLSI Design”, www.research.ibm.com/acas, 2001. |
Assaderaghi, et al., “Dynamic Threshold-Voltage MOSFET (DTMOS) for Ultra-Low Voltage Vlsi”, IEEE Transactions on Electron, vol. 44, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 414-422. |
Wei, et al., “Effect of Floating-Body Charge on SOI MOSFET Design”, IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 2, Feb. 1998. |
Duyet, et al., “Effects of Body Reverse Pulse Bias on Geometric Component of Charge Pumping Current in FD SOI MOSFETs”, Proceedings IEEE Int'l SOI Conference, Oct. 1998, pp. 79-80. |
Lee, et al., “Effects of Gate Structure on the RF Performance in PD SOI MOSFETs”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 15, No. 4, Apr. 2005. |
Krishnan, “Efficacy of Body Ties Under Dynamic Switching Conditions in Partially Depleted SOI CMOS Technology”, Proceedings IEEE Int'l SOI Conference, Oct. 1997, pp. 140-141. |
Lu, et al., “Floating Body Effects in Partially Depleted SOI CMOS Circuits”, ISPLED, Aug. 1996, pp. 1-6. |
Ueda, et al., “Floating Body Effects on Propagation Delay in SOI/CMOS LSIs”, IEEE SOI Conference, Oct. 1996, pp. 142-143. |
Matsumoto, et al., “Fully Depleted 30-V-Class Thin Film SOI Power Mosfet”, IEDM 95-979, 1995, pp. 38.6.1-38.6.4. |
Lee, et al., “Harmonic Distortion Due to Narrow Width Effects in Deep Submicron SOI-CMOS Device for Analog-RF Applications”, IEEE Int'l SOI Conference, Oct. 2002, pp. 83-85. |
Assaderaghi, et al., “History Dependence of Non-Fully Depleted (NFD) Digital SOI Circuits”, 1996 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers 13.1, 1996, pp. 122-123. |
Damiano, et al., “Integrated Dynamic Body Contact for H Gate PD SOI MOSFETs for High Performance/Low Power”, IEEE SOI Conference, Oct. 2004, pp. 115-116. |
Tat, International Search Report and Written Opinion received from USRO dated Jul. 3, 2008 for related appln. No. PCT/US06/36240. |
Rauly, et al., Investigation of Single and Double Gate SOI MOSFETs in Accumulation Mode for Enhanced Performances and Reduced Technological Drawbacks, Proceedings 30th European Solid-State Device Research Conference, Sep. 2000, pp. 540-543. |
Morishita, et al., “Leakage Mechanism Due to Floating Body and Countermeasure on Dynamic Retention Mode of SOI-DRAM”, 1995 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, Apr. 1995, pp. 141-142. |
Keys, “Low Distortion Mixers or RF Communications”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California-Berkeley, 1995. |
Chen, et al., “Low Power, Multi-Gigabit Dram Cell Design Issues Using SOI Technologies”, http://bwrc.eecs. berkeley.edu/people/grad—students/chenff/reports, May 1999. |
Pelella, et al., “Low-Voltage Transient Bipolar Effect Induced by Dynamic Floating-Body Charging in Scaled PD/SOI MOSFET's”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 17, No. 5, May 1996. |
Wei, “Measurement and Modeling of Transient Effects in Partially Depleted SOI MOSFETs”, M.S. Thesis, MIT, Jul. 1996. |
Wei, et al., “Measurement of Transient Effects in SOI DRAM/SRAM Access Transistors”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 17, No. 5, May 1996. |
Shoucair, “Modeling, Decoupling and Supression of MOSFET Distortion Components”, IEEE Proceeding Circuit Devices Systems, vol. 146, No. 1, Feb. 1999. |
Tat, Notice of Allowance received from USPTO dated Sep. 16, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/520,912. |
Shingleton, Office Action received from USPTO dated Oct. 7, 2008 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816. |
Tat, Office Action received from USPTO dated Dec. 10, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/520,912. |
Shingleton, Office Action received from USPTO dated Jan. 19, 2010 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816. |
Tat, Office Action received from USPTO dated Jul. 8, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/520,912. |
Tat, Office Action received from USPTO dated Sep. 15, 2008 for related U.S. Apl. No. 11/520,912. |
Shahidi, et al., “Partially Depleted SOI Technology for Digital Logic”, IEEE Int'l Solid-State Circuits Conference, 1999, pp. 426-427. |
Stuber, et al., Photocopy of an amendment that was filed with the USPTO dated Mar. 16, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/520,912. |
Stuber, et al., Photocopy of an amendment that was filed with the USPTO dated Sep. 8, 2009 for related U.S. Appl. No. 11/520,912. |
Photocopy of a translation of an Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2009 for related Chinese appln. No. 200680025128.7. |
Hameau, et al., “Radio-Frequency Circuits in Integration Using CMOS SOI 0.25um Technology”, 2002 RF IC Design Workshop Europe, Mar. 2002, Grenoble, France. |
Dribinsky, Response file in USPTO date Aug. 28, 2009 to related U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,816. |
Matloubian, “Smart Body Contact for SOI MOSFETs”, 1989 IEEE SOS/SOI Technology Conference, Oct. 1999, pp. 128-129. |
Chuang, et al., “SOI for Digital CMOS VLSI Design: Design Consideration and Advances”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, No. 4, Apr. 1998, pp. 689-720. |
Chung, et al., “SOI MOSFET Structure with a Junction Type Body Contact for Suppression of Pass Gate Leakage”, IEEE Transactions on Elelctron Devices, vol. 48, No. 7, Jul. 2001. |
Rozeau, et al., “SOI Technologies Overview for Low-Power Low-Voltage Radio-Frequency Aplications”, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 25, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Nov. 2000, pp. 93-114. |
Kuge, et al., “SOI-DRAM Circuit Technologies for Low Power High Speed Multigiga Scale Memories”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 31, No. 4, Apr. 1996, pp. 586-591. |
Kuang, et al., “SRAM Bitline Circuits on PD SOI: Advantages and Concerns”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 6, Jul. 1997. |
Maeda, et al., “Substrate-Bias Effect and Source-Drain Breakdown Characteristics in Body-Tied Short-Channel SOI MOSFET's”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 46, No. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 151-158. |
Morena, Supplementary European Search Report dated Feb. 17, 2010 relating to appln. No. 06814836.0. |
Duyet, et al., “Suppression of Geometric Component of Charge Pumping Current in Thin Film Silicon on Insulator Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 37, Jul. 1998, pp. L855-858. |
Casu, et al., “Synthesis of Low-Leakage PD-SOI Circuits with Body Biasing”, Int'l Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, Aug. 2001, pp. 287-290. |
Wang, et al., “Threshold Voltage Instability at Low Temperatures in Partially Depleted Thin Film SOI MOSFET's”, 1990 IEEE SOS/SOI Technology Conference, Oct. 1990, pp. 91-92. |
Shimomura, et al., “TP 4.3: A 1V 46ns 16Mb SOI-DRAM with Body Control Technique”, 1997 IEEE Int'l Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 1997. |
Assaderaghi, et al, “Transient Pass-Transistor Leakage Current in SOI MOSFET's”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 6, Jun. 1997, pp. 241-243. |
Brindle, et al., Translation of a response filed with the Chinese Patent Office dated Nov. 30, 2009 relating to appln. No. 200680025128.7. |
Mashiko, et al., “Ultra-Low Power Operation of Partially-Depleted SOI/CMOS Integrated Circuits”, IEICE Transactions on Electronic Voltage, No. 11, Nov. 2000, pp. 1697-1704. |
Das, et al., “Ultra-Low-Leakage Power Strategies for Sub-1 V VLSI: Novel Circuit Styles and Design Methodologies for Partially Depleted Silicon-on-Insulator (PD-SOI) CMOS Technology”, Proceedings of the 16th Int'l Conference on VLSI Design, 2003. |
Pelloie, et al., “WP 25.2: SOI Technology Performance and Modeling”, 1999 IEEE Int'l Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 1999. |
Goldman, et al., “0.15um SOI DRAM Technology Incorporating Sub-Volt Dynamic Threshold Devices for Embedded Mixed-Signal & RF Circuits”, 2001 IEEE SOI Conference, Oct. 2001, pp. 97-98. |
Hirota, et a., “0.5V 320MHz 8b Multiplexer/Demultiplexer Chips Based on a Gate Array with Regular-Structured DTMOS/SOI”, ISSCC, Feb. 1998, pp. 12.2-1-122-11. |
Fuse, et al., “0.5V SOI CMOS Pass-Gate Logic”, 1996 IEEE Int'l Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 1996, pp. 88-89,424. |
Brindle, et al., Response filed in the EPO for related appln. No. 06814836.0/1235 dated Oct. 12, 2010. |
Numata, et al., “A +2.4/0 V Controlled High Power GaAs SPDT Antenna Switch IC for GSM Application”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2002, pp. 141-144. |
Huang, et al., “A 0.5-urn CMOS T/R Switch for 900-MHz Wireless Applications”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2001, pp. 486-492. |
Tinella, et al., “A 0.7dB Insertion Loss Cmos—SOI Antenna Switch with More than 50dB Isolation over the 2.5 to 5GHz Band”, Proceeding of the 28th European Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2002, pp. 483-486. |
Ohnakado, et al., “A 1.4dB Insertion Loss, 5GHz Transmit/Receive Switch Utilizing Novel Depletion-Layer Extended Transistors (DETs) in 0.18um CMOS Process”, Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, 2002, pp. 162-163. |
Nakayama, et al., “A 1.9 GHz Single-Chip RF Front-End GaAs MMIC with Low-Distortion Cascade FET Mixer for Personal Handy-Phone System Terminals”, IEEE, 1998, pp. 101-104. |
McGrath, et al., “A 1.9-GHz GaAs Chip Set for the Personal Handyphone System”, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 1995, pp. 1733-1744. |
Nakayama, et al., “A 1.9GHz Single-Chip RF Front End GaAs MMIC for Personal Communications”, Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium, 1996, pp. 69-72. |
Nakayama, et al., “A 1.9GHz Single-Chip RF Front End GaAs MMIC with Low-Distortion Cascode FET Mixer for Personal Handy-Phone System Terminals”, Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 1998, pp. 205-208. |
Gu, et al., “A 2.3V PHEMT Power SP3T Antenna Switch IC for GSM Handsets”, IEEE GaAs Digest, 2003, pp. 48-51. |
Darabi, et al., “A 2.4GHz CMOS Transceiver for Bluetooth”, IEEE, 2001, pp. 89-92. |
Huang, et al., “A 2.4-GHz Single-Pole Double Throw T/R Switch with 0.8-dB Insertion Loss Implemented in a CMOS Process”, Silicon Microwave Integrated Circuits and Systems Research, 2001, pp. 1-4. |
Huang, et al., “A 2.4-GHz Single-Pole Double Throw T/R Switch with 0.8-dB Insertion Loss Implemented in a CMOS Process (slides)”, Silicon Microwave Integrated Circuits and Systems Research, 2001, pp. 1-16. |
Yamamoto, et al., “A 2.4GHz Band 1.8V Operation Single Chip SI-CMOS T/R Mmic Front End with a Low Insertion Loss Switch”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 36, No. 8, Aug. 2001, pp. 1186-1197. |
Kawakyu, et al., “A 2-V Operation Resonant Type T/R Switch with Low Distortion Characteristics for 1.9GHz Phs”, IEIC Trans Electron, vol. E81-C, No. 6, Jun. 1998, pp. 862-867. |
Huang, et al., “A 900-MHz T/R Switch with a 0.8-dB Insertion Loss Implemented in a 0.5-um CMOS Process”, IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2000, pp. 341-344. |
Workman, et al., “A Comparative Analysis of the Dynamic Behavior of BTG/SOI MOSFET's and Circuite with Distributed Body Resistance”, IEEE Transactions and Electron Devices, vol. 45, No. 10, Oct. 1998, pp. 2138-2145. |
Valeri, et al., “A Composite High Voltage Device Using Low Voltage SOI MOSET's”, IEEE, 1990, pp. 169-170. |
Miyatsuji, et al., “A GaAs High Power RF Single Pole Double Throw Switch IC for Digital Mobile Communication System”, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 1994, pp. 34-35. |
Miyatsuji, et al., “A GaAs High Power RF Single Pole Dual Throw Switch IC for Digital Mobile Communication System”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 1995, pp. 979-983. |
Puechberty, et al., “A GaAs Power Chip Set for 3V Cellular Communications”, 1994. |
Yamamoto, et al., “A GaAs RF Transceiver IC for 1.9GHz Digital Mobile Communication Systems”, ISSCC96, 1996, pp. 340-341, 469. |
Choumei, et al., “A High Efficiency, 2V Single Supply Voltage Operation RF Front End MMIC for 1.9GHz Personal Handy Phone Systems”, IEEE, 1998, pp. 73-76. |
Schindler, et al., “A High Power 2-18 GHz T/R Switch”, IEEE Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium, 1990, pp. 119-122. |
Gu, et al., “A High Power DPT MMIC Switch for Broadband Wireless Applications”, IEEE MTT-S Digest, 2003, pp., 173-176. |
Tinella, et al., “A High Performance CMOS-SOI Antenna Switch for the 2.5-5-GHz Band”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2003, pp. 1279-1283. |
Gu, et al., “A High Performance GaAs SP3T Switch for Digital Cellular Systems”, IEEE MTT-S Digest, 2001, pp. 241-244. |
Numata, et al., “A High Power Handling GSM Switch IC with New Adaptive Control Voltage Generator Circuit Scheme”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2003, pp. 233-236. |
Madihian, et al., “A High Speed Resonance Type FET Transceiver Switch for Millimeter Wave Band Wireless Networks”, 26th EuMC, 1996, pp. 941-944. |
Tokumitsu, et al., “A Low Voltage High Power T/R Switch MMIC Using LC Resonators”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 1995, pp. 997-1003. |
Colinge, et al., “A Low Voltage Low Power Microwave SOI MOSFET”, IEEE International SOI Conference, 1996, pp. 128-129. |
Johnson, et al., “A Model for Leakage Control by MOS Transistor Stacking”, ECE Technical Papers, 1997, pp. 1-28. |
Matsumoto, et al., “A Novel High Frequency Quasi-SOI Power MOSFET for Multi-Gigahertz Application”, IEEE, 1998, pp. 945-948. |
Giugni, “A Novel Multi-Port Microwave/Millimeter-Wave Switching Circuit”, Microwave Conference, 2000. |
Caverly, “A Project Oriented Undergraduate CMOS Analog Microelectronic System Design Course”, IEEE, 1997, pp. 87-88. |
Harjani, et al., “A Prototype Framework for Knowledge Based Analog Circuit Synthesis”, IEEE Design Automation Conference, 1987, pp. 42-49. |
DeROSSI, et al., “A Routing Switch Based on a Silicon-on-Insulator Mode Mixer”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 1999, pp. 194-196. |
Kanda, et al., “A Si RF Switch MMIC for the Cellular Frequency Band Using SOI-CMOS Technology”, The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, 2000, pp. 79-83. |
Caverly, et al., “A Silicon CMOS Monolithic RF and Microwave Switching Element”, 27th European Microwave Conference, 1997, pp. 1046-1051. |
Valeri, et al., “A Silicon-on-Insulator Circuit for High Temperature, High-Voltage Applications”, IEEE, 1991, pp. 60-61. |
Yamamoto, et al., “A Single-Chip GaAs RF Transceiver for 1.9GHz Digital Mobile Communication Systems”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 1996. |
Yamamoto, et al., “A Single-Chip GaAs RF Transceiver for 1.9GHz Digital Mobile Communication Systems”, IEEE, 1996, pp. 1964-1973. |
Tsutsumi, et al., “A Single Chip PHS Front End MMIC with a True Single +3 Voltage Supply”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 1998, pp. 105-108. |
Wambacq, et al., “A Single Package Solution for Wireless Transceivers”, IEEE, 1999, pp. 1-5. |
Eggert, et al., A SOI-RF-CMOS Technology on High Resistivity Simox Substrates for Microwave Applications to 5 GHz, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1997, pp. 1981-1989. |
Hu, et al., “A Unified Gate Oxide Reliability Model”, IEEE 37th Annual International Reliability Physic Symposium, 1999, pp. 47-51. |
Szedon, et al., “Advanced Silicon Technology for Microwave Circuits”, Naval Research Laboratory, 1994, pp. 1-110. |
Johnson, et al., “Advanced Thin Film Silicon-on-Sapphire Technology: Microwave Circuit Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 1998, pp. 1047-1054. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Dec. 2005 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,135. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated May 2008 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 11/582,206. |
Kai, an English translation of an Office Action received from the Japanese Patent Office dated Jul. 2010 relating to appln. No. 2007-518298. |
Burgener, et al., Amendment filed in the USPTO dated Apr. 2010 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 11/501,125. |
Heller, et al., “Cascode Voltage Switch Logic: A Different CMOS Logic Family”, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 1984, pp. 16-17. |
Pylarinos, “Charge Pumps: An Overview”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2003, pp. 1-7. |
Doyama, “Class E Power Amplifier for Wireless Transceivers”, University of Toronto, 1999, pp. 1-9. |
“CMOS Analog Switches”, Harris, 1999, pp. 1-9. |
“CMOS SOI RF Switch Family”, Honeywell, 2002, pp. 1-4. |
“CMOS SOI Technology”, Honeywell, 2001, pp. 1-7. |
Burgener, “CMOS SOS Switches Offer Useful Features, High Integration”, Microwaves & RF, 2001, pp. 107-118. |
Analog Devices, “CMOS, Low Voltage RFNideo, SPST Switch”, Analog Devices, inc., 1999, pp. 1-10. |
Eggert, et al., “CMOS/SIMOX-RF-Frontend for 1.7GHz”, Solid State Circuits Conference, 1996. |
Orndorff, et al., CMO/SOS/LSI Switching Regulator Control Device, IEEE International, vol. XXI, Feb. 1978, pp. 234-235. |
Burgener, et al., Comments on Examiners Statements of Reasons for Allowance filed in the USPTO dated Aug. 2004 relating to U.S. Appl. No. 10/267,531. |
Aquilani, Communication and supplementary European Search Report dated Nov. 2009 relating to appln. No. 05763216. |
Van Der Peet, Communications pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Jun. 2008 relating to appln. No. 02800982.7-2220. |
Aquilani, Communications pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received from the EPO dated Mar. 2010 relating to appln. No. 05763216.8. |
Weman, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC and Annex Form 2004 received from the EPO dated Nov. 2009 relating to appln. No. 020800982.7. |
Van Der Peet, Communications pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Aug. 2009 relating to appln. No. 02800982.7-2220. |
Yamamoto, et al., “Design and Experimental Results of a 2V-Operation Single-Chip GaAs T/R MMIC Front-End for 1.9GHz Personal Communications”, IEEE, 1998, pp. 7-12. |
Savla, “Design and Simulation of a Low Power Bluetooth Transceiver”, The University of Wisconsin, 2001, pp. 1-90. |
Henshaw, “Design of an RF Transceiver”, IEEE Colloquium on Analog Signal Processing, 1998. |
Baker, et al., “Designing Nanosecond High Voltage Pulse Generators Using Power MOSFET's”, Electronic Letters, 1994, pp. 1634-1635. |
Barker, Communication Electronics-Systems, Circuits, and Devices, 1987, Prentice-Hall. |
Carr, “Secrets of RF Circuit Design”, McGraw.Hill, 1997. |
Couch, “Digital and Analog Communication Systems”, 2001, Prentice-Hall. |
Couch, “Modern Telecommunication System”, Prentice-Hall. 1995. |
Freeman, “Radio System Design for Telecommunications”, Wiley, 1997. |
NEC Corporation, “uPG13xG Series L-Band SPDT Switch GaAs MMIC”, Document No. P1096EJ1VOANDO (1st Edition). Feb. 1996, 30 pgs. |
Pozar, “Microwave and RF Design of Wireless Systems”, Wiley, 2001. |
Inanns, “The RF and Microwave Circuit Design Cookbook”, Artech House, 1998. |
Smith, “Modern Communication Systems”, McGraw-Hill, 1998. |
Van Der Pujie, “Telecommunication Circuit Design”, Wiley, 2002. |
Razavi,“RF Microelectronics”. Prentice-Hall, 1998. |
Van Der Pujie, “Telecommunication Circuit Design”, Wiley, 1992. |
Weisman, “The Essential Guide to RF and Wireless”, Prentice-Hall, 2000. |
Wetzel, “Silicon-on-Sapphire Technology for Microwave Power Application”, University of California, San Diego, 2001. |
Johnson, “Silicon-on-Sapphire Technology for Microwave Circuit Applications”, Dissertation. UCSD, 1997, pp. 1-184. |
Drozdovsky, et al., “Large Signal Modeling of Microwave Gallium Nitride Based HFETs”, Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, 2001, pp. 248-251. |
Ayasli, “Microwave Switching with GaAs FETs”, Microwave Journal, 1982, pgs. 719-723. |
Eron, “Small and Large Signal Analysis of MESETs as Switches” Microwave Journal, 1992. |
“A Voltage Regulator for GaAs FETs”, Microwave Journal, 1995. |
Slobodnik, et al., “Millimeter Wave GaAs Switch FET Modeling”, Microwave Journal, 1989. |
Madihian, et al., “A 2-V, 1-10GHz BiCMOS Transceiver Chip for Multimode Wireless Communications Networks”, IEEE, 1997, pp. 521-525. |
Caverly, “Distortion in GaAs MESFET Switch Circuits”, 1994. |
Chen, et al., “Dual-Gate GaAs FET: A Versatile Circuit Component for MMICs”, Microwave Journal, Jun. 1989, pp. 125-135. |
Bullock, “Transceiver and System Design for Digital Communication”, Noble, 2000. |
Crols, “CMOS Wireless Transceiver Design”, Kluwer Academic, 1997. |
Hickman, “Practical RF Handbook”, Newnes, 1997. |
Hagen, “Radio Frequency Electronics”, Cambridge University Press, 1996. |
Koh, et al., “Low-Voltage SOI CMOS VLSI Devices and Circuits”, Wiley Interscience, XP001090589, New York, 2001, pp. 57-60, 349-354. |
Leenaerts, “Circuits Design for RF Transceivers” Kluwer Academic, 2001. |
Johnson, “Advanced High-Frequency Radio Communication”, Artech House, 1997. |
Larson, “RF and Microwave Circuit Design for Wireless Communications”, Artech House, 1996. |
Misra, “Radio Frequency and Microwave Communication Circuits”, Wiley, 2001. |
Ajjkuttira, et al., “A Fully Integrated Cmos RFIC for Bluetooth Applications”, IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2001, pp. 1-3. |
Apel, et al., “A GaAs Mmic Transceiver for 2.45 GHz Wireless Commercial Products”, Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium, 1994, pgs. 15-18. |
Assaderaghi, et al., “Dynamic Threshold Voltage MOSFET (DTMOS) for Ultra Low Voltage VLSI”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 3, Mar. 1997, pp. 414-422. |
Bolam, et al., “Reliability Issues for Silicon-on-Insulator”, IEEE, 2000, pp. 6.4.1-6A.4. |
Bolam, et al., “Reliability Issues for Silicon-on-Insulator”, IBM Micro Electronics Division, IEEE 2000, pp. 6.4.1-6.4.4. |
Caverly, et al., “CMOS RF Circuits for Integrated Wireless Systems”, IEEE, 1998, pp. 1-4. |
Chao, et al., “High-Voltage and High-Temperature Applications of DTMOS with Reverse Schottky Barrier on Substrate Contacts”, vol. 25, No. 2, Feb. 2004, pp. 86-88. |
Devlin, et al., “A 2.4 GHz Single Chip Transceiver”, Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium, 1993, pp. 23-26. |
Fiorenza, et al., “RF Power Performance of LDMOSFETs on SOI: An Experimental Comparison with Bulk Si MOSFETs”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2001, pp. 43-46. |
Giffard, et al., “Dynamic Effects in SOI MOSFETs”, IEEE SOS/SOI Technology Conference, Oct. 1991, pp. 160-161. |
Hirano, et al., “Impact of Actively Body-Bias Controlled (ABC) SOI SRAM by Using Direct Body Contact Technology for Low-Voltage Applications”, IEEE, 2003, pp. 2.4.1-2.4.4. |
Imai, et al., “Novel High Isolation FET Switches”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 1996, pp. 685-691. |
Ishida, et al., “A Low Power GaAs Front End IC with Current Reuse Configuration Using 0.15um Gate GaAs MODFETs”, IEEE, 1997, pp. 669-672. |
Iwata, et al., “Gate Over Driving CMOS Architecture for 0.5V Single Power Supply Operated Devices”, IEEE, 1997, pp. 290-291, 473. |
Kumar, et al., “A Simple High Performance Complementary TFSOI BiCMOS Technology with Excellent Cross-Talk Isolation”, 2000 IEEE International Soi Conference, 2000, pp. 142-143. |
“An X-Band SOS Resistive Gate Insulator Semiconductor (RIS) Switch”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Device, 1980, pp. 442-448. |
Lee, et al., “Effect of Body Structure on Analog Performance of SOI NMOSFETs”, 1998 IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 1998, pp. 61-62. |
Lee, “CMOS RF: (Still) No Longer an Oxymoron (Invited)”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 1999, pp. 3-6. |
McRory, et al., “Transformer Coupled Stacked FET Power Amplifier”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 2, Feb. 1999, pp. 157-161. |
Nagayama, et al., “Low Insertion Los DP3T MMIC Switch for Dual Band Cellular Phones”, IEEE Jounral of Solid State Circuits, 1999, pp. 1051-1055. |
Nishijima, et al., “A High Performance Transceiver Hybrid IC for PHS Hand Set Operating with Single Positive Voltage Supply”, Microwave Symposium Digest, 1997, pp. 1155-1158. |
O, et al., “CMOS Components for 802.11b Wireless LAN Applications”, IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, 2002, pp. 103-106. |
Peczalski, “RF/Analog/Digital SOI Technology GPS Receivers and Other Systems on a Chip”, IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2002, pp. 2013-2017. |
Shifrin, et al., “A New Power Amplifier Topology with Series Biasing and Power Combining of Transistors”, IEEE 1992 Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium, 1992, pp. 39-41. |
Shimura, et al., “High Isolation V-Band SPDT Switch MMIC for High Power Use”, IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2001, pp. 245-248. |
Uda, et al., “A High Performance and Miniturized Dual Use (antenna/local) GaAs SPDT Switch IC Operating at +3V/0V”, Microwave Symposium Digest, 1996, pp. 141-144. |
Uda, et al., “High Performance GaAs Switch IC's Fabricated Using MESFETs with Two Kinds of Pinch Off Voltages and a Symmetrical Pattern Configuration”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 1994, pp. 1262-1269. |
Lee, et al., “Analysis of Body Bias Effect with PD-SOI for Analog and RF Application”, Solid State Electron, vol. 46, 2002, pp. 1169-1176. |
Ippoushi, “SOI Structure Avoids Increases in Chip Area and Parasitic Capacitance Enables Operational Control of Transistor Threshold Voltage”, Renesas Edge, vol. 2004.5, Jul. 2004, p. 15. |
Park, “A Regulated, Charge Pump CMOS DC/DC Converter for Low Power Application”, 1998, pp. 1-62. |
Hittite Microwave, Floating Ground SPNT MMIC Switch Driver Techniques, 2001. |
Caverly, et al., “Gallium Nitride-Based Microwave and RF Control Devices”, 2001. |
Sedra, et al., “Microelectronic Circuits”, University of Toronto, Oxford University Press, Fourth Edition, 1982,1987,1991,1998, pp. 374-375. |
Bahl, “Lumped Elements for RF and Microwave Circuits”, Artech House, 2003, pp. 353-394. |
“Positive Bias GaAs Multi-Throw Switches with Integrated TTL Decoders”, Hittite Microwave, 2000. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110092179 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60328353 | Oct 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12315395 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 12980161 | US | |
Parent | 11582206 | Oct 2006 | US |
Child | 12315395 | US | |
Parent | 10922135 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 11582206 | US | |
Parent | 10267531 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 10922135 | US |