Switch controlled current sensing using a hall effect sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8963535
  • Patent Number
    8,963,535
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 30, 2009
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 24, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
An electronic system includes a Hall sensor to sense a controlled current. The Hall sensor is positioned proximate to a signal path and develops a voltage that includes a component corresponding to a controlled current. A controller generates a switch control signal to control conductivity of a switch, and the switch controls drive current for a load. The controller receives information either directly or indirectly from the Hall sensor corresponding to the controlled current and utilizes the information from the Hall sensor to control conductivity of the switch. Controlling conductivity of the switch controls the drive current for the load. The frequency of the switch control signal is sufficiently higher than a Hall sensor noise voltage to allow the controller to sufficiently cancel out the noise voltage for control purposes.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates in general to the field of electronics, and more specifically to a system and method for sensing switch controlled currents using a Hall effect sensor.


2. Description of the Related Art


Electronic systems often detect signal values and utilize the values to perform other operations. Hall effect sensors (“Hall sensors”) are used in some contexts to detect signals. A Hall sensor generates a voltage corresponding to a magnetic field passing through the Hall sensor. An electrical current flowing through a conductor in proximity to a Hall sensor generates a magnetic field. The Hall sensor generates a voltage corresponding to the magnetic field generated by the current. Hall sensors generally have a low frequency noise component that is too large to allow detection of small changes in currents. For example, as explained subsequently in more detail, switching power converters that operate in continuous conduction mode (CCM) sense currents using a current sense circuit such as a resistor or a transformer.



FIG. 1A represents a power control system 100, which includes switching power converter 102. In at least one embodiment, switching power converter operates in a continuous conduction mode (CCM). In CCM, the inductor current iL does not go to zero during operation of switching power converter 102. As subsequently described in more detail, in CCM operation, PFC and output voltage controller 114 senses controlled current iCC by sensing a voltage across resistor 109. Voltage source 101 supplies an alternating current (AC) input voltage VIN to a full bridge diode rectifier 103. The voltage source 101 is, for example, a public utility, and the AC voltage VIN is, for example, a 60 Hz/110 V line voltage in the United States of America or a 50 Hz/220 V line voltage in Europe. The rectifier 103 rectifies the input voltage VIN and supplies a rectified, time-varying, line input voltage VX to the switching power converter.


The switching power converter 102 includes at least two switching operations, i.e. controlling field effect transistor (FET) 108 to provide power factor correction and controlling FET 108 to provide regulation of link voltage VLINK. The goal of power factor correction technology is to make the switching power converter 102 appear resistive to the voltage source 101 so that the real power provided to switching power converter 102 is equal to the apparent power provided to switching power converter 102. The inductor current iL ramps ‘up’ when FET 108 conducts, i.e. is “ON”. The inductor current iL ramps down when FET 108 is nonconductive, i.e. is “OFF”, and supplies current iL to recharge capacitor 106. The time period during which inductor current iL ramps down is commonly referred to as the “inductor flyback time”. Diode 111 prevents reverse current flow into inductor 110. In at least one embodiment, control signal CS0 is a pulse width modulated signal, and FET 108 is an n-channel FET. In this embodiment, control signal CS0 is a gate voltage of FET 108, and FET 108 conducts when the pulse width of CS0 is high. Thus, the ‘on-time’ of FET 108 is determined by the pulse width of control signal CS0. In at least one embodiment, the switching power converter 102 operates in CCM, i.e. ramp up time of the inductor current iL plus the inductor flyback time is greater than or equal to the period of the control signal CS0.


In at least one embodiment, switching power converter 102 boosts a 110-120 V rectified input voltage VX to a higher link voltage VLINK, such as 200-400V. Accordingly, FET 108 is fabricated to have a breakdown voltage sufficient to accommodate the controlled current iCCT and voltage drops across FET 108 associated with the high input voltage VX and higher link voltage VLINK. FET 108 is a high breakdown voltage device fabricated using a “high” voltage process. In at least one embodiment, FET 108 has a breakdown voltage greater than or equal to 30V and at least sufficient to accommodate operating characteristics of switching power converter 102. In at least one embodiment, power factor correction (PFC) and output voltage controller 114 is an integrated circuit and is fabricated using a low voltage process that is insufficient to fabricate a switch with a sufficiently high breakdown voltage to control the controlled current iCCT. Thus, FET 108 is located external to PFC and output voltage controller 114. As subsequently described in more detail, PFC and output voltage controller 114 generates a pulse width modulated control signal CS0 to control conductivity of FET 108. In at least one embodiment, FET 108 is a FET, and control signal CS0 is a gate voltage.


Switching power converter 102 includes current sense resistor 109. The switch controlled current iCC generates a sense voltage VSEN across current sense resistor 109. The PFC and output voltage controller 114 receives the sense voltage VSEN. The resistance R of sense resistor 109 is known. The sense voltage VSEN is directly related to switch controlled current iCC via Ohm's law, i.e. VSEN=iCC·R. “R” represents a resistance value of sense resistor 109, and the value of R is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, PFC and output voltage controller 114 utilizes the sense voltage VSEN and sensing two signals, namely, the line input voltage VX and the capacitor voltage/output voltage VLINK to generate the pulse width and duty cycle of control signal CS0.


Capacitor 106 supplies stored energy to load 112. The capacitor 106 is sufficiently large so as to maintain a substantially constant output voltage VLINK, as established by PFC and output voltage controller 114 (as discussed in more detail below). The output voltage VLINK remains substantially constant during constant load conditions. However, as load conditions change, the output voltage VLINK changes. The switch state controller 114 responds to the changes in VLINK and adjusts the control signal CS0 to restore a substantially constant output voltage as quickly as possible. The PFC and output voltage controller 114 includes a small capacitor 115 to filter any high frequency signals from the line input voltage VX.


The switch state controller 114 of power control system 100 controls FET 108 and, thus, controls power factor correction (PFC) and regulates output power of the switching power converter 102. As previously stated, the goal of power factor correction technology is to make the switching power converter 102 appear resistive to the voltage source 101. Thus, the switch state controller 114 attempts to control the inductor current iL so that the average inductor current iL is linearly and directly related to the line input voltage VX. A CCM PFC controller, model number UCC28019A, available from Texas Instruments, Inc., Texas, USA is an example of switch state controller 114. The switch state controller 114 controls the pulse width (PW) and period (TT) of control signal CS0. To regulate the amount of energy transferred and maintain a power factor close to one, switch state controller 114 varies the period of control signal CS0 so that the input current iL tracks the changes in input voltage VX and holds the output voltage VLINK constant. Thus, as the input voltage VX increases, switch state controller 114 increases the period TT of control signal CS0, and as the input voltage VX decreases, switch state controller 114 decreases the period of control signal CS0. At the same time, the pulse width PW of control signal CS0 is adjusted to maintain a constant duty cycle (D) of control signal CS0, and, thus, hold the output voltage VLINK constant.


In at least one embodiment, the switch state controller 114 updates the control signal CS0 at a frequency much greater than the frequency of input voltage VX. The frequency of input voltage VX is generally 50-60 Hz. The frequency 1/TT of control signal CS0 is, for example, between 20 kHz and 130 kHz. Frequencies at or above 20 kHz avoid audio frequencies and frequencies at or below 130 kHz avoid significant switching inefficiencies while still maintaining good power factor, e.g. between 0.9 and 1, and an approximately constant output voltage VLINK.


Light emitting diodes (LEDs) are becoming particularly attractive as main stream light sources in part because of energy savings through high efficiency light output and environmental incentives such as the reduction of mercury. LEDs are semiconductor devices and are driven by direct current. The brightness (i.e. luminous intensity) of the LED approximately varies in direct proportion to the current flowing through the LED. Thus, increasing current supplied to an LED increases the brightness of the LED and decreasing current supplied to the LED dims the LED. Current can be modified by either directly reducing the direct current level to the LEDs or by reducing the average current through the LEDs through duty cycle modulation.



FIG. 1B depicts an LED driver system 150. The LED driver system 150 includes a CCM, buck-based switching power converter 152 to provide a load voltage to switching LED system 154. Voltage source 151 supplies the AC supply voltage VIN to a full, diode bridge rectifier 153. The hold-up capacitor C1 holds an approximately direct current (DC) link voltage VLINK across capacitor C1 relative to a reference voltage VR. Link voltage VLINK is also the output voltage of power converter 152 and the input voltage for controller 156. Input filter capacitor C2 provides a high pass filter for high frequency components of the output voltage of rectifier 153. A thermistor NTC1 provides in-rush current protection for power converter 152.


The controller 156 is, for example, a Supertex HV9915B integrated circuit controller available from Supertex, Inc. of Sunnyvale, Calif. The link voltage VLINK can vary from, for example, 8V to 450V. The controller 156 provides a gate drive signal from the GATE output node to the n-channel metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) Q1. Controller 156 modulates the gate drive signal, and thus, the conductivity of MOSFET Q1 to provide a constant current to LED system 154. Controller 156 modifies the average resistance of MOSFET Q1 by varying a duty cycle of a pulse width modulated gate drive signal VGATE. Resistor R1 and capacitor C3 provide external connections for controller 156 to the ground reference.


Controller 156 generates and uses feedback to maintain a constant current iLED for LEDs 158. Controller 156 receives a current feedback signal Vfb representing a feedback voltage Vfb sensed across sense resistor R2. The feedback voltage Vfb is directly proportional to the LED current iLED in LEDs 158. If the feedback voltage Vfb exceeds a predetermined reference corresponding to a desired LED current, the controller 156 responds to the feedback voltage Vfb by decreasing the duty cycle of gate drive signal VGATE to increase the average resistance of MOSFET Q1 over time. If the feedback voltage Vfb is less than a predetermined reference corresponding to the desired LED current, the controller 156 responds to the feedback voltage Vfb by increasing the duty cycle of gate drive signal VGATE to decrease the average resistance of MOSFET Q1 over time.


The LED system 154 includes a chain of one or more, serially connected LEDs 158. When the MOSFET Q1 is “on”, i.e. conductive, diode D1 is reversed bias and, current iLED flows through the LEDs 158 and charges inductor L1. When the MOSFET Q1 is “off”, i.e. nonconductive, the voltage across inductor L1 changes polarity, and diode D1 creates a current path for the LED current iLED. The inductor L1 is chosen so as to store enough energy to maintain a constant current iLED when MOSFET Q1 is “off”.


Sensing the controlled current through current sense circuit 109 (FIG. 1A) and the controlled LED current iLED through resistor R2 (FIG. 1B) results in power loss and can be inaccurate.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus includes an integrated circuit. The integrated circuit includes a Hall sensor configured to sense a magnetic field of a controlled current. The integrated circuit also includes a controller coupled to the Hall sensor, wherein the controller is configured to receive information from the Hall sensor and to use the information to determine a time to cause a switch, which controls the controlled current, to conduct.


In another embodiment of the present invention, a method includes sensing a magnetic field of a controlled current using a Hall sensor and receiving information from the Hall sensor. The method further includes utilizing the information to determine a time to cause a switch, which controls the controlled current, to conduct.


In a further embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus includes means for sensing a magnetic field of a controlled current using a Hall sensor. The apparatus also includes means for receiving information from the Hall sensor, and means for utilizing the information to determine a time to cause a switch, which controls the controlled current, to conduct.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention may be better understood, and its numerous objects, features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference number throughout the several figures designates a like or similar element.



FIG. 1A (labeled prior art) depicts an electronic system having a controller to control a switching power converter.



FIG. 1B (labeled prior art) depicts a switching light emitting diode (LED) driver system with LED current feedback.



FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D each depict an electronic system that includes a Hall sensor in a controller to sense a magnetic field generated by a current controlled by the controller.



FIG. 3 depicts an embodiment of the controller for FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D.



FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart showing an exemplary controlled current detection and switch control algorithm.



FIG. 5 depicts an exemplary Hall sensor voltage graph.



FIGS. 6A and 6B depict exemplary integrated circuit controllers that include Hall sensors.



FIG. 7 depicts an embodiment of the electronic system of FIG. 2.



FIG. 8 depicts another embodiment of the electronic system of FIG. 2.



FIG. 9 depicts a light source.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An electronic system includes a Hall sensor to sense a magnetic field of a controlled current. An average value of the current is controlled by controlling a switch. In at least one embodiment, a controller generates a duty cycle modulated switch control signal to control the switch. Increasing the duty cycle of the switch control signal increases the average value of the controlled current, and decreasing the duty cycle decreases the average value of the controlled current. The controller utilizes information from the Hall sensor about the magnetic field of the controlled current as feedback to control the controlled current. For example, if the information from the Hall sensor indicates the controlled current is too high relative to a target value, the controller decreases the duty cycle of the switch control signal. If the information from the Hall sensor indicates the controlled current is too low relative to the target value, the controller increases the duty cycle of the switch control signal.


In general, conventionally, low frequency noise of a Hall sensor prevents the Hall sensor from accurately sensing voltages related to small changes in current. In a switching power converter, in at least one embodiment, an average current in the switching power converter is controlled within +/−a few milliamps. Thus, conventionally, Hall sensors are not used in such applications because of the relatively large noise component of the Hall sensor. In at least one embodiment, a switching frequency fiCCT of the switch in the switching power converter corresponds to a frequency of pulses of the controlled current. The switching frequency fiCCT of the switch and, thus, the frequency of the controlled current is high relative to a frequency fN of the noise of the Hall sensor. For example, in at least one embodiment, fiCCT is at least 100 times larger than the noise frequency, i.e. fiCCT≧100·fN. Because fiCCT>>fN, the Hall noise voltage is effectively constant during a single cycle of the controlled current. The controller can determine a difference between information from the Hall sensor that does not include a component associated with the controlled current to information that includes a component associated with the controlled current and effectively cancel out the Hall sensor noise since the Hall noise voltage is effectively constant during a pulse of the controlled current. For example, if while the Hall noise voltage is effectively constant, the information that does not include a component associated with the controlled current is a baseline voltage VHB and the information that includes the component associated with the controlled current is VHB+VICCT, then the controller can determine ViCCT by subtraction, i.e. ViCCT=VHB−(VHB+ViCCT). “ViCCT” corresponds to a value of the controlled current. The controller can, thus, effectively cancel out the noise from the Hall sensor. The controller can then utilize the determined value ViCCT of the controlled current as feedback to generate the switch control signal to control the controlled current.


In at least one embodiment, the Hall sensor is positioned proximate to a signal path that conducts the controlled current and develops a voltage that includes a voltage component corresponding to the controlled current. A controller controls conductivity of a switch, and the switch controls the controlled current. Controlling conductivity of the switch controls the controlled current. The controller receives information either directly or indirectly from the Hall sensor corresponding to the controlled current and utilizes the information from the Hall sensor to control conductivity of the switch. In at least one embodiment, the controller generates a duty cycle modulated control signal to control the switch. In at least one embodiment, a pulse of the control signal causes the switch to turn “on”, i.e. conduct. In at least one embodiment, the switch can control the current for any purpose, including but not limited to providing power factor correction in a switching power converter and/or driving a load. The load can be any type of load including but not limited to, for example, a light emitting diode (LED) based light source.


In at least one embodiment, the electronic system includes a switching power converter operating in continuous conduction mode (CCM). The Hall sensor senses a magnetic field generated by a controlled current in the switch of the switching power converter and generates a sense signal corresponding to the controlled current. The controller utilizes the sense signal to provide, for example, power factor correction for the CCM switching power converter. In at least one embodiment, the switching power converter operates in discontinuous conduction mode (DCM), and the controller utilizes the sense signal to provide, for example, power factor correction for the DCM switching power converter.


In at least one embodiment, the electronic system includes a light source having one or more light emitting diodes (LEDs). The Hall sensor senses a magnetic field generated by a controlled current in the LEDs and generates a sense signal corresponding to the controlled current. The controller utilizes the sense signal to regulate current in the LEDs.


In at least one embodiment, the Hall sensor and the controller are at least part of an integrated circuit that is connected to a printed circuit board. The printed circuit board includes a signal path, referred to as a “signal trace”, that conducts the controlled current. In at least one embodiment, the Hall sensor is positioned proximate to the signal trace and develops a voltage that includes a voltage component corresponding to the controlled current.


In at least one embodiment, utilizing the Hall sensor to detect the controlled current iCCT is more accurate than using a sense resistor (such as sense resistor 109 (FIG. 1)) and dissipates less power than using the sense resistor.



FIG. 2A depicts an electronic system 200 that includes a controller 202, and controller 202 generates a switch control signal CS1 to control conductivity of switch 204. As subsequently described in more detail, controller 202 includes a Hall sensor (HS) 203 to sense controlled current iCCT from load 210. The controlled current iCCT into the switch 204 is routed via signal path 206 within close enough proximity to Hall sensor 203 to allow Hall sensor 203 to develop a voltage corresponding to a magnetic field generated by the controlled current iCCT. In at least one embodiment, the signal path 206 is actually connected to switch 204. Signal path 206 is shown as broken without showing the actual connection to switch 204 or load 210 because the particular connection points is a matter of design choice. For example, signal path 206 could connect after switch 204, before switch 204, before load 210, and so on. In at least one embodiment, the signal path 206 receives a mirrored copy of controlled current iCCT. The connection and routing of signal path 206 to conduct the controlled current iCCT are matters of design choice. Exemplary connection embodiments are subsequently described. Additionally, the number of turns around Hall sensor 203 is a matter of design choice. The solid line turn of signal path 206 indicates a single turn. The dashed line 207 indicates two or more turns of signal path 206. As subsequently described in more detail, Hall sensor 203 develops a voltage corresponding to the controlled current iCCT. Controller 202 utilizes the voltage developed by Hall sensor 203 corresponding to the controlled current iCCT as feedback to generate a switch control signal to control the controlled current iCCT.


Electronic system 200 also includes a power source 208 to supply the controlled current iCCT to load 210. Power source 208 can be any source of power, such as voltage source 101 or any power supply that supplies enough power for operation of load 210. Load 210 can be any type of load that utilizes or supplies a switch controlled current iCCT. In at least one embodiment, load 210 includes one or more light emitting diodes (LEDs).


Controller 202 generates switch control signal CS1 to control conductivity of current control switch 204 using, for example, duty cycle modulation. Switch 204 can be any type of switch that can be controlled by a switch control signal. In at least one embodiment, switch 204 is a field effect transistor (FET), and switch control signal CS1 is a duty cycle modulated signal. In at least one embodiment, each pulse 212 of control signal CS1 causes switch 204 to conduct. When each pulse ends, switch 204 is nonconductive. Turning switch 204 “on” and “off” in accordance with the duty cycle of switch control signal CS1 establishes an average resistance of switch 204. Since an average value of controlled current iCCT is directly related to the average resistance of switch 204, the duty cycle of control signal CS1 controls an average value of controlled current iCCT.


The Hall sensor 203 generates a voltage corresponding to a magnetic field of controlled current iCCT. Hall sensor 203 also produces a noise voltage component that can represent a significant component of the voltage generated by Hall sensor 203. In at least one embodiment, the noise voltage of Hall sensor 203 has a relatively low frequency fN relative to a frequency fiCCT of switch control signal CS1. In at least one embodiment, the frequency fiCCT of switch control signal CS1 is also the frequency of controlled current iCCT. As illustratively described in more detail below, in at least one embodiment, because fiCCT>>fN, controller 202 can sense a baseline noise voltage VHB of Hall sensor 203 (or obtain a representation of the baseline voltage VHB, such as an amplified baseline voltage VHB) prior to sensing a signal voltage corresponding to the magnetic field of controlled current iCCT. In at least one embodiment, the frequency fiCCT is 100-1,000 times greater than the noise frequency fN. The frequency fiCCT of switch control signal CS1 is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, since the baseline noise voltage VHB remains effectively constant during a pulse of the higher frequency controlled current, controller 202 subsequently determines the voltage VICCT corresponding to the magnetic field of the controlled current iCCT by subtracting the baseline noise VHB voltage of Hall sensor 203 from a Hall sensor output voltage VH representing VICCT and VHB. Thus, controller 202 effectively cancels out the baseline noise voltage VHB of Hall sensor 203. Since the controlled current iCCT corresponds to the voltage VICCT corresponding to the magnetic field of the controlled current iCCT, controller 202 can determine a value of the controlled current iCCT. The dashed A-A line is a cross-section reference for controller 202 discussed subsequently with reference to FIG. 6A.



FIG. 2B depicts an electronic system 240 that includes a controller 242 to control power factor correction of a switching power converter 248. As subsequently described in more detail, controller 242 includes a Hall sensor 203 to sense controlled current iCCT through switch 244. The controlled current iCCT is routed via signal path 206. Again, the particular connection points of signal path 206 to conduct controlled current iCCT in the switching power converter 248 or a representation of controlled current iCCT are not shown because they are a matter of design choice. As previously described, controller 242 utilizes the voltage developed by Hall sensor 203 corresponding to the controlled current iCCT to control controlled current iCCT.


Controller 242 generates control signal CS2 to control conductivity of current control switch 244. Switch 244 can be any type of switch that can be controlled by a switch control signal. In at least one embodiment, switch 244 is a field effect transistor (FET), and switch control signal CS2 is a duty cycle modulated signal. In at least one embodiment, each pulse 214 of control signal CS2 causes switch 244 to conduct. When each pulse ends, switch 244 is nonconductive. Thus, the duty cycle of control signal CS2 controls an average value of controlled current iCCT through switch 244. The particular methodology for generating control signal CS2 using feedback from Hall sensor 203 is a matter of design choice.


Electronic system 240 also includes a voltage source 246 to provide a supply voltage to switching power converter 248. In at least one embodiment, voltage source 246 is a public utility voltage source such as voltage supply 101 (FIG. 1). Switching power converter 248 can be any type of switching power converter that provides a controlled current iCCT to load 250. Switching power converter 248 can be any type of switching power converter, such as a boost-type, buck-type, or boost-buck type switching power converter. Load 250 can be any type of load, such as a light source that includes one or more LEDs.



FIG. 2C depicts electronic system 260, which represents one embodiment of electronic system 240 (FIG. 2B). Electronic system 260 includes a switching power converter 261, which represents one embodiment of switching power converter 248 (FIG. 2B). Electronic system 260 includes a printed circuit board (PCB) 262, and controller 242 is attached to PCB 262. Pins 263 and 264 of PCB 262 couple Hall sensor 203 to switch 244. As subsequently described with reference to FIG. 6A, signal path 265 represents a printed circuit board trace routed within a close enough proximity to Hall sensor 203 to allow Hall sensor 203 to sense a magnetic field generated by controlled current iCCT. In at least one embodiment, controller 242 operates switching power converter 260 in CCM. In at least one embodiment, voltage source 266 is a public utility voltage source such as voltage supply 101 (FIG. 1), and full-bridge diode rectifier 267 rectifies the input voltage VIN to generate an AC, rectified voltage VX. In at least one embodiment, using a sense signal from Hall sensor 203 indicating a value of controlled current iCCT and exemplary feedback signals VX and VLINK representing the rectified voltage VX and link voltage VLINK, the controller 242 generates switch control signal CS2 to control switch 244 and provide power factor correction for switching power converter 261. In at least one embodiment, switch control signal CS2 also controls power factor correction and regulates link voltage VLINK in accordance with any conventional methodology and conventional controller, such as the CCM PFC controller, model number UCC28019A, available from Texas Instruments, Inc., Texas, USA.



FIG. 2D depicts an electronic system 270 that includes a controller 272, and controller 272 generates a switch control signal CS1 to control conductivity of switch 274. As subsequently described in more detail, controller 272 includes a Hall sensor 203 to sense controlled current iCCT from load 280. The controlled current iCCT is routed via signal path 206. The signal path 206 is within sufficient proximity to Hall sensor 203 to allow the Hall sensor 203 to develop a voltage corresponding to a magnetic field generated by the controlled current iCCT. The connection and routing of signal path 206 to conduct the controlled current iCCT is a matter of design choice. Exemplary connection embodiments are described subsequently. As previously described, controller 272 utilizes the voltage developed by Hall sensor 203 as feedback corresponding to the controlled current iCCT to generate switch control signal CS2 to control controlled current iCCT.


Load driver 278 can be any type of load driver that provides a controlled current iCCT to load 280. In at least one embodiment, load driver 278 is a switching power converter, such as switching power converter 248, and controller 272 also generates a switch control signal CS2 to control switch 244 as described with reference to FIG. 2B. Load 210 can be, for example, any type of load utilizing a controlled current iCCT. In at least one embodiment, load 280 includes one or more light emitting diodes (LEDs).


Controller 272 generates control signal CS1 to control conductivity of a current control switch 274. Switch 274 can be any type of switch that can be controlled by a switch control signal. In at least one embodiment, switch 274 is a field effect transistor (FET), and switch control signal CS2 is a duty cycle modulated signal. In at least one embodiment, each pulse 284 of control signal CS2 causes switch 274 to conduct. When each pulse ends, switch 274 is nonconductive. Thus, the duty cycle of control signal CS2 controls an average value of controlled current iCCT. The generation of control signal CS2 is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, controller 272 generates switch control signal CS2 in the manner of generating a switch control signal illustratively described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/864,366, entitled “Time-Based Control of a System having Integration Response,” inventor John L. Melanson, and filed on Sep. 28, 2007 (referred to herein as “Melanson I”). In at least one embodiment, controller 272 generates switch control signal CS2 in the manner of generating a switch control signal illustratively described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/415,830, entitled “Primary-Side Based Control Of Secondary-Side Current For An Isolation Transformer,” inventor John L. Melanson, and filed on Mar. 31, 2009 (referred to herein as “Melanson II”). Melanson I and II are incorporated by reference in their entireties.


As similarly described with reference to electronic system 200 (FIG. 2A), in at least one embodiment, the frequency fiCCT of switch control signal CS1, and, thus, the frequency of each pulse of controlled current iCCT, exceeds the frequency fN of the noise voltage of Hall sensor 203 by an amount sufficient to allow controllers 242, 262, and 272 to each effectively cancel out the noise voltage and determine a value of controlled current iCCT. For example, in at least one embodiment, each of controllers 242, 262, and 272 determines the voltage VICCT corresponding to the magnetic field of the controlled current iCCT by subtracting a sensed baseline noise voltage VHB of Hall sensor 203 from a sensed voltage Hall sensor output voltage VH representing the voltage corresponding to the magnetic field ViCCT of the controlled current iCCT plus the baseline noise voltage VHB of Hall sensor 203. Since the controlled current iCCT corresponds to the voltage corresponding to the magnetic field of the controlled current iCCT, each of controllers 242, 262, and 272 can determine a value of the controlled current iCCT.



FIG. 3 depicts controller 300, which represents an exemplary embodiment of controllers 202, 242, and 272. FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart showing an exemplary controlled current detection and switch control algorithm 400 utilized by controller 300 to determine a value associated with a controlled current and to use the value as feedback to generate a switch control signal to control the controlled current. FIG. 5 depicts an exemplary Hall sensor voltage graph 500 to illustrate how the controller effectively cancels out the Hall sensor baseline noise voltage VHB.


Because the Hall sensor 203 functions based upon a magnetic field of controlled current iCCT, the discussion no references FIG. 6A, which illustrates an exemplary placement of signal path 206 and a resulting magnetic field of the controlled current iCCT. Referring to FIG. 6A, FIG. 6A depicts an exemplary integrated circuit controller 600 that includes a Hall sensor 602. Controller 600 represents one embodiment of controllers 202, 242, 272, and 300 fabricated as an integrated circuit and located within an integrated circuit package 604. The particular dimensions of controller 600 and Hall sensor 602 are a matter of design choice. The integrated circuit package 604 represents a cross-section of controller 202 along cross-sectional line A-A and includes exemplary leads 606 and 608. The integrated circuit leads 606 and 608 connect controller 600 to a printed circuit board 610. Signal path 612 represents an exemplary cross section of signal paths 206, 265, and 312. Signal path 612 is a signal trace in printed circuit board 610. “.X” and “.O” are appended to identifiers 612 to respectively indicate entry and exit points of controlled current iCCT in the cross-section of signal path 612. When controlled current iCCT is flowing as indicated, controlled current iCCT generates a magnetic field B indicated by the concentric, dashed circles 614. At the Hall sensor 602, the direction of the magnetic field B is generally “up” as indicated by arrow 616. Dimension d0 represents a distance between the longitudinal centers of signal path 612.O and Hall sensor 602. Dimension d1 represents a distance between longitudinal centers of signal path 612.X and Hall sensor 602. Dimension d2 represents a distance between latitudinal centers of signal path 612 and Hall sensor 602. The particular values for dimensions d0, d1, and d2 are a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, d0=d1=d2=1 mm. In at least one embodiment, d0=d1=d2 range from approximately 1 mm to several millimeters, such as 5 mm.


An exemplary operation of controller 300 is described with reference to FIGS. 3, 4, 5, and 6A. In at least one embodiment, the exemplary operation relates to controller 300 controlling switch 322 to control power factor correction in a switching power converter, such as switching power converter 248, operating in continuous conduction mode. In at least one embodiment, the exemplary operation relates to controller 300 controlling switch 322 to control the controlled current iCCT in a load, such as load 280.


Hall sensor 302 is an example of a Hall effect device. The particular design of Hall sensor 302 is a matter of design choice. Hall sensor 302 is, for example, fabricated from conductive material in a layer as part of an integrated circuit version of controller 300. In some embodiments, Hall sensor 302 is a silicon diffusion layer, a doped silicon layer, or polysilicon. Hall sensor 302 has four connection tabs 304, 306, 308, and 310. Tab 304 is connected to a constant current source 311, and tab 308 is connected to a reference, such as ground. Constant current source 311 supplies a current iH that flows through Hall sensor 302. As controlled current iCCT flows through signal path 612, a magnetic field B develops through the Hall sensor 302 as illustratively discussed in conjunction with FIG. 6A. The magnetic field B causes a separation of charge in Hall sensor 302. The separation of charge causes a voltage VH+ to develop at tap 310 and a voltage VH- to develop at tab 306. Differential amplifier 314 amplifies the difference voltage VH+−VH− to generate Hall sensor output voltage VH. Thus, the Hall sensor output voltage VH equals VH+−VH−. The sensed Hall sensor output voltage VH is a function of the controlled current iCCT. The particular relationship between controlled current iCCT and Hall sensor output voltage VH is a function of various factors such as the material from which Hall sensor 203 is fabricated, the routing and configuration of magnetic field B, and so on. The particular function can be determined by a one of ordinary skill in the art using well-known techniques.


In at least one embodiment, signal path 612 has one turn as depicted in cross-section in FIG. 6A. However, signal path 612 can have any number of turns and any orientation. The number of turns and orientation of the turns is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, signal path 612 includes multiple turns in different layers of PCB 610 to increase the strength of the magnetic field B of controlled current iCCT sensed by Hall sensor 302. Additionally, signal path 312 can be routed through one or more layers of the controller 600. In another embodiment, magnetic material is used with the signal path 612 to direct the magnetic field.


Routing of the signal path conducting controlled current iCCT is a matter of design choice. The signal path 612FIG. 6B depicts another routing configuration for controlled current iCCT in an integrated circuit package 652 housing controller 600. The integrated circuit package 652 also represents a cross-section of controller 202 (FIG. 2) along cross-sectional line A-A and includes exemplary leads 654 and 656. Wires 658 and 660 connect controller 600 to respective leads 654 and 656. Leads 654 and 656 are part of a lead frame of integrated circuit package 652 that attach integrated circuit 652 to PCB 657. Signal path 662 represents an exemplary cross section of signal paths 206, 265, and 312. Signal path 662 is a signal trace located on top of lead 654. “.X” and “.O” are appended to identifiers 662 to respectively indicate entry and exit points of controlled current iCCT in the cross-section of signal path 662. When controlled current iCCT is flowing as indicated, controlled current iCCT generates a magnetic field B indicated by the concentric, dashed circles 664. At the Hall sensor 602, the direction of the magnetic field B is generally “up” as indicated by arrow 666. The Hall sensor 602 generates a voltage proportional to the magnetic field of the controlled current iCCT in signal path 662.


Referring to FIGS. 3, 4, and 5, Hall sensor 302 produces a low frequency noise voltage 502. The noise voltage 502 is shown as a dotted line during a pulse of controlled current iCCT, which occurs during time periods TA and TB. The actual Hall sensor output voltage VH is the solid line 504, which includes the noise voltage 502 and the noise voltage 502 and the voltage VICCT corresponding to the controlled current iCCT. Analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 316 converts the Hall sensor output voltage VH into a digital value VH(n). In at least one embodiment, processor 318 is digital signal processor or a mixed analog and digital signal processor. In at least one embodiment, the operations in controlled current detection and switch control algorithm 400 are stored as code in memory 320. The particular configuration and operation of processor 318 is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, processor 318 retrieves the code from memory 320 and performs the operations of controlled current detection and switch control algorithm 400. In at least one embodiment, controlled current detection and switch control algorithm 400 is stored as firmware in a memory within processor 318. In at least one embodiment, controlled current detection and switch control algorithm 400 is stored in an off-chip memory that is accessible to processor 318. In at least one embodiment, processor 318 is configured as an analog device to perform operations in controlled current detection and switch control algorithm 400.


Referring now to FIG. 4, in operation 402, processor 318 senses the Hall sensor output voltage VH at time t0 (i.e. prior to turning current control switch “on”) to obtain a baseline Hall sensor noise voltage VHB. Because the frequency fN of the Hall baseline noise voltage VHB is much larger than the frequency fiCCT of switch control signal CS1, the Hall baseline voltage VHB remains relatively constant during time period TA. Time t0 corresponds to a time prior to generating switch control signal CS1 to turn switch 322 “on”, i.e. cause switch 322 to conduct. Switch 322 represents one embodiment of switches 204, 244, and 274.


In operation 404, processor 318 generates a pulse of control signal CS1 at time t1, which causes switch 322 to conduct and the controlled current iCCT to increase. The particular methodology for generating control signal CS1 is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, each period of control signal CS1 is constant, as, for example, described in Melanson I and II (“periods” are described in terms of switch states in Melanson I).


The time lapse between times t0 and t1 is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, the time lapse between times t1−t0 is minimized to establish a baseline noise voltage VHB that is approximately unchanged between times t0 and t2. In operation 406, processor 318 samples the Hall sensor output voltage VH at time t1 to determine an initial voltage value V0 of the Hall sensor voltage Hall sensor output voltage VH. The initial value V0 represents the Hall baseline noise voltage VHB plus the voltage VICCT corresponding to the controlled current iCCT at the beginning of the pulse of switch control signal CS1. The initial value of the controlled current iCCT at time t1 is a function of V0−VHB, since V0=VHB+VICCT. As previously discussed, determination of the initial value of the controlled current iCCT from V0−VHB is a well-known function based on the material make-up of the Hall sensor 203, the number of turns of signal path 206, and distances d0, d1, and d2 (FIG. 6A), and so on.


As the controlled current iCCT increases, the strength of the magnetic field B increases, and, thus, the voltage VICCT component of the Hall sensor output voltage VH also increases as shown by arrow 506. However, since the noise frequency fN of Hall sensor 304 is much less than the frequency fiCCT of the switch control signal CS1, the baseline noise voltage VHB remains relatively constant during period TA. Processor 318 continues to sample the Hall sensor output voltage VH to determine when the Hall sensor output voltage VH has increased from the initial voltage V0 to the target voltage VTARGET. The particular sampling frequency of the Hall sensor output voltage VH is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, the sampling frequency is high enough to determine approximately when the Hall sensor output voltage VH has increased from the initial voltage V0 to the target voltage VTARGET.


Operation 408 determines whether the Hall sensor output voltage VH has increased from the initial voltage V0 by a target voltage VTARGET. In at least one embodiment, the target voltage VTARGET is directly related to the controlled current iCCT. The particular target voltage VTARGET depends on, for example, a desired average controlled current. For example, in at least one embodiment, the initial voltage V0 represents 350 mA, the target voltage VTARGET represents 50 mA, and the peak voltage V1 represents 400 mA, so that the average controlled current equals 400 mA.


In at least one embodiment, to determine if the Hall sensor output voltage VH equals the initial voltage V0+VTARGET, between times t1 and t2 operation 408 subtracts the initial voltage V0 from a sampled Hall sensor output voltage VH to determine if the sampled Hall sensor output voltage VH has increased from the initial voltage V0 by an amount equal to the target voltage VTARGET. The frequency fiCCT of switch control signal CS1 is large relative to the frequency fN of Hall voltage noise 502. For example, in at least one embodiment, the frequency of switch control signal CS1 is approximately 100 kHz, and the frequency of the Hall voltage noise 502 is approximately 100 Hz. So, the Hall voltage noise 502 remains approximately constant between times t1 and t3. Thus, subtracting the initial sampled Hall sensor voltage V0 corresponding to the leading edge of switch control signal CS1 at time t1 from the current sample of Hall sensor output voltage VH represents the change VΔ in the voltage VICCT corresponding to the controlled current iCCT, i.e. VH=V0+VΔ.


If the Hall sensor output voltage VH does not equal the initial voltage V0+VTARGET, in operation 410, processor 318 continues generating a pulse of switch control signal CS1 to keep switch 322 “on”. Thus, the controlled current iCCT continues to increase causing the Hall sensor output voltage VH to increase. Operation 410 returns to operation 408, and processor 318 continues to sense the Hall sensor output voltage VH. If in operation 408 processor 318 determines that VΔ=VTARGET, operation 412 determines the time t2 at which VΔ=VTARGET.


In operation 414, processor 318 determines the time t3 at which to cease generating the pulse of control signal CS1 and, thus, turn switch 322 “off”. In at least one embodiment, the switch 322 turn “off” time t3 is set so that times t3−t2=t2−t1. Time period TA equals times t2−t1, and time period TB equals times t3−t2. Thus, in at least one embodiment, processor 318 sets the time period TA during which the Hall sensor output voltage VH rises from the baseline voltage V0 to the target voltage VTARGET V0 to be the same or approximately the same as the time period TB during which the Hall sensor output voltage VH rises from the target voltage VTARGET+V0 to a peak voltage V1.


In operation 416, processor 318 ends the pulse of control signal Cs1, thus, turning switch 322 “off”. When switch 322 is “off”, the controlled current iCCT continues to decrease. Operation 402 restarts controlled current detection and switch control algorithm 400 at the beginning of period TT1 for control signal CS1 and continues for each consecutive period.


As previously discussed, the connection and routing of signal paths 206, 265, and 312, which conduct embodiments of the controlled current iCCT, are a matter of design choice. FIGS. 7 and 8 depict respective, exemplary embodiments of electronic system 200 and routing of signal paths to conduct controlled current iCCT into a proximal relationship with Hall sensor 203, thus, allowing Hall sensor 203 to generate a voltage in response to the magnetic field of the controlled current iCCT.


Referring to FIG. 7, electronic system 700 represents one embodiment of electronic system 200. In electronic system 700, load driver 208 and controller 202 are attached to a printed circuit board 702. N-channel metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) 704 represents an embodiment of switch 212. Signal trace 706 represents an embodiment of signal trace 206. Signal trace 706 is in series with a source of MOSFET 704 and a reference voltage connection 708 to allow Hall sensor 203 to sense the magnetic field of the controlled current iCCT in signal trace 706.


Referring to FIG. 8, electronic system 800 represents one embodiment of electronic system 200. In electronic system 800, load driver 208 and controller 202 are attached to a printed circuit board 802. Signal trace 804 represents an embodiment of signal trace 206. Signal trace 804 is in series with a drain of MOSFET 704 to allow Hall sensor 203 to sense the magnetic field of the controlled current iCCT in signal trace 704.


The routings, connections, and configurations of a signal path to allow Hall sensor 203 to sense the magnetic field generated by the controlled current iCCT are virtually limitless and are a matter of design choice.



FIG. 9 depicts a light source 900, which represents one embodiment of load 210. Light source 900 includes one or more LEDs 902 and exemplary peripheral circuitry including a capacitor 904 connected across the LEDs 902, and series connected diode 906 and inductor 908 connected in parallel with capacitor 904 and LEDs 902.


Thus, an electronic system includes a Hall sensor to sense a controlled current, and a controller receives information either directly or indirectly from the Hall sensor corresponding to the controlled current and utilizes the information from the Hall sensor to control conductivity of a switch. In at least one embodiment, controlling conductivity of the switch controls a drive current for a load. In at least one embodiment, utilizing the Hall sensor to detect the controlled current iCCT is more accurate than using a sense resistor (such as sense resistor 109 (FIG. 1)) and dissipates less power than using the sense resistor.


Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, in at least one embodiment, the controlled current sensed by the Hall sensor 203 is representative of an actual controlled current iCCT but is not the current flowing through the load. For example, in at least one embodiment, a current mirror can be used to mirror the controlled current iCCT and the controlled current sensed by the Hall sensor 203 is the mirrored current.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising: an integrated circuit comprising: a Hall sensor configured to sense a magnetic field of a controlled current; anda controller coupled to the Hall sensor, wherein at least during operation the controller is configured to: (i) receive information from the Hall sensor, (ii) sample the information at a sample frequency sufficiently greater than a frequency of Hall sensor noise voltage to effectively cancel out the Hall sensor noise voltage from the information received from the Hall sensor, and (ii) use the information to determine a time to cause a switch, which controls the controlled current, to conduct.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the controller is configured to: sense a voltage V0 from the Hall sensor while the switch is nonconductive (“off”);generate a switch control signal at time t1 to cause the switch to conduct (“on”) and the controlled current to flow;sense a voltage V1 from the Hall sensor while the switch is conductive; anddetermine a time t3 to turn the switch “off” based on a time t2, wherein time t2 is when the sensed voltage V1 plus the sensed voltage V0 equals a target voltage; andgenerate the switch control signal at time t3 to turn the switch “off”.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the times t2−t1=t3−t2.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising: a signal trace located within proximity of the Hall sensor to allow the Hall sensor to sense the magnetic field of the controlled current.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the signal trace is included in a printed circuit board coupled to the integrated circuit.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 4 further comprising: an integrated circuit package containing the integrated circuit, wherein the integrated circuit includes a lead frame, wherein the signal trace is attached to the lead frame.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising: a circuit board coupled to the integrated circuit; andthe switch coupled to the circuit board via a signal trace, wherein the signal trace is configured to conduct the controlled current in proximity to the Hall sensor to allow the Hall sensor to sense the controlled current.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the switch comprises a field effect transistor and the signal trace is coupled in series with the switch.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising an analog-to-digital converter to convert the information received from the Hall sensor into a digital signal, wherein the information comprises the digital signal, and the digital signal represents a first voltage at a first time that includes a component associated with the controlled current and a component associated with Hall sensor noise and the digital signal represents a second voltage at a second time that includes the component associated with the Hall sensor noise and does not include the component associated with the controlled current, and the controller is further configured to determine a difference between the first voltage and the second voltage to determine a third voltage that corresponds to a value of the controlled current.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the component of the first voltage associated with the controlled current is directly proportional to a drive current for the load.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the apparatus further comprises a load, the load comprises at least one light emitting diode.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the information comprises an analog signal representing a first voltage at a first time that includes a component associated with the controlled current and a component associated with Hall sensor noise and the signal represents a second voltage at a second time that includes the component associated with the Hall sensor noise and does not include the component associated with the controlled current, and the controller is further configured to determine a difference between the first voltage and the second voltage to determine a third voltage that corresponds to a value of the controlled current.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the controller is configured to control the switch to control current in a load.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the switch is included in a switching power converter and the controller is configured to control the switch to provide power factor correction for the switching power converter.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14 further comprising: the switching power converter coupled to the controller.
  • 16. A method comprising: in an integrated circuit: sensing a magnetic field of a controlled current using a Hall sensor in the integrated circuit;receiving information from the Hall sensor;sampling the information received from the Hall sensor at a frequency sufficiently greater than a frequency of Hall sensor noise voltage to effectively cancel out the Hall sensor noise voltage from the information received from the Hall sensor; andutilizing the information to determine a time to cause a switch, which controls the controlled current, to conduct.
  • 17. The method of claim 16 further comprising: sensing a voltage V0 from the Hall sensor while the switch is nonconductive (“off”);generating a switch control signal at time t1 to cause the switch to conduct (“on”) and the controlled current to flow;sensing a voltage V1 from the Hall sensor while the switch is conductive; anddetermining a time t3 to turn the switch “off” based on a time t2, wherein time t2 is when the sensed voltage V1 plus the sensed voltage V0 equals a target voltage; andgenerating the switch control signal at time t3 to turn the switch “off”.
  • 18. The method of claim 17 wherein the times t2−t1=t3−t2.
  • 19. The method of claim 16 further comprising: conducting the controlled current in a signal trace located within proximity of the Hall sensor to allow the Hall sensor to sense the magnetic field of the controlled current.
  • 20. The method of claim 19 wherein the signal trace is included in a printed circuit board coupled to the integrated circuit.
  • 21. The method of claim 19 wherein the signal trace is attached to a lead frame of an integrated circuit.
  • 22. The method of claim 19 wherein the switch comprises a field effect transistor and the signal trace is coupled in series with the switch.
  • 23. The method of claim 16 further comprising converting the information received from the Hall sensor into a digital signal, wherein the digital signal represents a first voltage at a first time that includes a component associated with the controlled current and a component associated with Hall sensor noise and the digital signal represents a second voltage at a second time that includes the component associated with the Hall sensor noise and does not include the component associated with the controlled current, and the method further comprises: determine a difference between the first voltage and the second voltage to determine a third voltage that corresponds to a value of the controlled current.
  • 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the component of the first voltage associated with the controlled current is directly proportional to a drive current for the load.
  • 25. The method of claim 16 wherein the load comprises at least one light emitting diode.
  • 26. The method of claim 16 wherein the information comprises an analog signal representing a first voltage at a first time that includes a component associated with the controlled current and a component associated with Hall sensor noise and the analog signal represents a second voltage at a second time that includes the component associated with the Hall sensor noise and does not include the component associated with the controlled current, and the method further comprises: determine a difference between the first voltage and the second voltage to determine a third voltage that corresponds to a value of the controlled current.
  • 27. The method of claim 16 wherein utilizing the information to determine a time to cause a switch to conduct further comprises: controlling the switch to control power factor correction of a switching power converter.
  • 28. The method of claim 16 further comprising: conducting the controlled current in a signal trace located within proximity of the Hall sensor to allow the Hall sensor to sense the magnetic field of the controlled current, wherein the signal trace is included in a printed circuit board coupled to the integrated circuit.
  • 29. The method of claim 28 wherein the signal trace is attached to a lead frame of an integrated circuit.
  • 30. An apparatus comprising: an integrated circuit that includes: means for sensing a magnetic field of a controlled current using a Hall sensor in the integrated circuit;means for receiving information from the Hall sensor;means for sampling the information received from the Hall sensor at a frequency sufficiently greater than a frequency of Hall sensor noise voltage to effectively cancel out the Hall sensor noise voltage from the information received from the Hall sensor; andmeans for utilizing the information to determine a time to cause a switch, which controls the controlled current, to conduct.
  • 31. An apparatus comprising: an integrated circuit comprising: a Hall sensor configured to sense a magnetic field of a controlled current; anda controller coupled to the Hall sensor, wherein the controller is configured to: sense a voltage V0 from the Hall sensor while the switch is nonconductive (“off”);generate a switch control signal at time t1 to cause the switch to conduct (“on”) and the controlled current to flow;sense a voltage V1 from the Hall sensor while the switch is conductive; anddetermine a time t3 to turn the switch “off” based on a time t2, wherein time t2 is when the sensed voltage V1 plus the sensed voltage V0 equals a target voltage; andgenerate the switch control signal at time t3 to turn the switch “off”.
  • 32. The apparatus of claim 31 wherein the controller is further configured to effectively cancel out Hall sensor noise voltage from the information received from the Hall sensor to determine a time to cause the switch, which controls the controlled current, to conduct.
  • 33. The apparatus of claim 32 wherein a frequency of the Hall sensor noise voltage is sufficiently less than a sample frequency of the information received from the Hall sensor to effectively cancel out Hall sensor noise voltage from the information received from the Hall sensor.
  • 34. The apparatus of claim 31 wherein the times t2−t1=t3−t2.
  • 35. The apparatus of claim 31 further comprising: a signal trace located within proximity of the Hall sensor to allow the Hall sensor to sense the magnetic field of the controlled current, wherein the signal trace is included in a printed circuit board coupled to the integrated circuit.
  • 36. The apparatus of claim 35 further comprising: an integrated circuit package containing the integrated circuit, wherein the integrated circuit includes a lead frame, wherein the signal trace is attached to the lead frame.
  • 37. The apparatus of claim 31 wherein the apparatus further comprises a load, the load comprises at least one light emitting diode.
  • 38. The apparatus of claim 31 wherein the switch is included in a switching power converter and the controller is configured to control the switch to provide power factor correction for the switching power converter.
  • 39. A method comprising: in an integrated circuit: sensing a magnetic field of a controlled current using a Hall sensor in the integrated circuit;sensing a voltage V0 from the Hall sensor while the switch is nonconductive (“off”);generating a switch control signal at time t1 to cause the switch to conduct (“on”) and the controlled current to flow;sensing a voltage V1 from the Hall sensor while the switch is conductive; anddetermining a time t3 to turn the switch “off” based on a time t2, wherein time t2 is when the sensed voltage V1 plus the sensed voltage V0 equals a target voltage; andgenerating the switch control signal at time t3 to turn the switch “off”.
  • 40. The method of claim 39 wherein utilizing the information to determine a time to cause a switch further comprises: effectively cancelling out Hall sensor noise voltage received from the Hall sensor to determine a time to cause the switch, which controls the controlled current, to conduct.
  • 41. The method of claim 40 further comprising: sampling the voltages received from the Hall sensor at a frequency sufficiently greater than a frequency of the Hall sensor noise voltage to effectively cancel out the Hall sensor noise voltage received from the Hall sensor.
  • 42. The method of claim 39 wherein the times t2−t1=t3−t2.
  • 43. The method of claim 39 wherein the load comprises at least one light emitting diode.
  • 44. The method of claim 39 wherein utilizing the information to determine a time to cause a switch to conduct further comprises: controlling the switch to control power factor correction of a switching power converter.
US Referenced Citations (264)
Number Name Date Kind
3316495 Sherer Apr 1967 A
3423689 Miller et al. Jan 1969 A
3586988 Weekes Jun 1971 A
3725804 Langan Apr 1973 A
3790878 Brokaw Feb 1974 A
3881167 Pelton et al. Apr 1975 A
4075701 Hofmann Feb 1978 A
4334250 Theus Jun 1982 A
4409476 Lofgren et al. Oct 1983 A
4414493 Henrich Nov 1983 A
4476706 Hadden et al. Oct 1984 A
4523128 Stamm Jun 1985 A
4677366 Wilkinson et al. Jun 1987 A
4683529 Bucher Jul 1987 A
4700188 James Oct 1987 A
4737658 Kronmuller et al. Apr 1988 A
4797633 Humphrey Jan 1989 A
4937728 Leonardi Jun 1990 A
4940929 Williams Jul 1990 A
4973919 Allfather Nov 1990 A
4979087 Sellwood et al. Dec 1990 A
4980898 Silvian Dec 1990 A
4992919 Lee et al. Feb 1991 A
4994952 Silva et al. Feb 1991 A
5001620 Smith Mar 1991 A
5055746 Hu et al. Oct 1991 A
5109185 Ball Apr 1992 A
5121079 Dargatz Jun 1992 A
5206540 de Sa e Silva et al. Apr 1993 A
5264780 Bruer et al. Nov 1993 A
5278490 Smedley Jan 1994 A
5323157 Ledzius et al. Jun 1994 A
5359180 Park et al. Oct 1994 A
5383109 Maksimovic et al. Jan 1995 A
5424932 Inou et al. Jun 1995 A
5477481 Kerth Dec 1995 A
5479333 McCambridge et al. Dec 1995 A
5481178 Wilcox et al. Jan 1996 A
5565761 Hwang Oct 1996 A
5589759 Borgato et al. Dec 1996 A
5638265 Gabor Jun 1997 A
5691890 Hyde Nov 1997 A
5747977 Hwang May 1998 A
5757635 Seong May 1998 A
5764039 Choi et al. Jun 1998 A
5768111 Zaitsu Jun 1998 A
5781040 Myers Jul 1998 A
5783909 Hochstein Jul 1998 A
5798635 Hwang et al. Aug 1998 A
5900683 Rinehart et al. May 1999 A
5912812 Moriarty, Jr. Jun 1999 A
5929400 Colby et al. Jul 1999 A
5946202 Balogh Aug 1999 A
5946206 Shimizu et al. Aug 1999 A
5952849 Haigh et al. Sep 1999 A
5960207 Brown Sep 1999 A
5962989 Baker Oct 1999 A
5963086 Hall Oct 1999 A
5966297 Minegishi Oct 1999 A
5994885 Wilcox et al. Nov 1999 A
6016038 Mueller et al. Jan 2000 A
6037763 Trontelj Mar 2000 A
6043633 Lev et al. Mar 2000 A
6072969 Yokomori et al. Jun 2000 A
6083276 Davidson et al. Jul 2000 A
6084450 Smith et al. Jul 2000 A
6091233 Hwang Jul 2000 A
6125046 Jang et al. Sep 2000 A
6150774 Mueller et al. Nov 2000 A
6181114 Hemena et al. Jan 2001 B1
6211626 Lys et al. Apr 2001 B1
6211627 Callahan Apr 2001 B1
6229271 Liu May 2001 B1
6229292 Redl et al. May 2001 B1
6246183 Buonavita Jun 2001 B1
6259614 Ribarich et al. Jul 2001 B1
6300723 Wang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304066 Wilcox et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304473 Telefus et al. Oct 2001 B1
6343026 Perry Jan 2002 B1
6344811 Melanson Feb 2002 B1
6369525 Chang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385063 Sadek et al. May 2002 B1
6392400 Lancaster et al. May 2002 B1
6407514 Glaser et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407515 Hesler Jun 2002 B1
6407691 Yu Jun 2002 B1
6441558 Muthu et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445600 Ben-Yaakov Sep 2002 B2
6452521 Wang Sep 2002 B1
6469484 L'Hermite et al. Oct 2002 B2
6495964 Muthu et al. Dec 2002 B1
6509913 Martin, Jr. et al. Jan 2003 B2
6531854 Hwang Mar 2003 B2
6580258 Wilcox et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583550 Iwasa et al. Jun 2003 B2
6628106 Batarseh et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636003 Rahm et al. Oct 2003 B2
6646848 Yoshida et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657417 Hwang Dec 2003 B1
6688753 Calon et al. Feb 2004 B2
6713974 Patchornik et al. Mar 2004 B2
6724174 Esteves et al. Apr 2004 B1
6727832 Melanson Apr 2004 B1
6737845 Hwang May 2004 B2
6741123 Anderson et al. May 2004 B1
6753661 Muthu et al. Jun 2004 B2
6756772 McGinnis Jun 2004 B2
6768655 Yang et al. Jul 2004 B1
6781351 Mednik et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788011 Mueller et al. Sep 2004 B2
6806659 Mueller et al. Oct 2004 B1
6839247 Yang Jan 2005 B1
6860628 Robertson et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870325 Bushell et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873065 Haigh et al. Mar 2005 B2
6882552 Telefus et al. Apr 2005 B2
6888322 Dowling et al. May 2005 B2
6894471 Corva et al. May 2005 B2
6933706 Shih Aug 2005 B2
6940733 Schie et al. Sep 2005 B2
6944034 Shytenberg et al. Sep 2005 B1
6956750 Eason et al. Oct 2005 B1
6958920 Mednik et al. Oct 2005 B2
6963496 Bimbaud Nov 2005 B2
6967448 Morgan et al. Nov 2005 B2
6970503 Kalb Nov 2005 B1
6975079 Lys et al. Dec 2005 B2
6975523 Kim et al. Dec 2005 B2
6980446 Simada et al. Dec 2005 B2
7003023 Krone et al. Feb 2006 B2
7034611 Oswal et al. Apr 2006 B2
7050509 Krone et al. May 2006 B2
7064498 Dowling et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064531 Zinn Jun 2006 B1
7072191 Nakao et al. Jul 2006 B2
7075329 Chen et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078963 Andersen et al. Jul 2006 B1
7088059 McKinney et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099163 Ying Aug 2006 B1
7102902 Brown et al. Sep 2006 B1
7106603 Lin et al. Sep 2006 B1
7109791 Epperson et al. Sep 2006 B1
7126288 Ribarich et al. Oct 2006 B2
7135824 Lys et al. Nov 2006 B2
7145295 Lee et al. Dec 2006 B1
7158633 Hein Jan 2007 B1
7161816 Shytenberg et al. Jan 2007 B2
7180250 Gannon Feb 2007 B1
7183957 Melanson Feb 2007 B1
7221130 Ribeiro et al. May 2007 B2
7233135 Noma et al. Jun 2007 B2
7246919 Porchia et al. Jul 2007 B2
7255457 Ducharm et al. Aug 2007 B2
7265531 Stauth et al. Sep 2007 B2
7266001 Notohamiprodjo et al. Sep 2007 B1
7276861 Shteynberg et al. Oct 2007 B1
7288902 Melanson Oct 2007 B1
7292013 Chen et al. Nov 2007 B1
7310244 Yang et al. Dec 2007 B2
7345458 Kanai et al. Mar 2008 B2
7375476 Walter et al. May 2008 B2
7388764 Huynh et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394210 Ashdown Jul 2008 B2
7414389 Nguyen Aug 2008 B2
7511437 Lys et al. Mar 2009 B2
7538499 Ashdown May 2009 B2
7545130 Latham Jun 2009 B2
7554473 Melanson Jun 2009 B2
7569996 Holmes et al. Aug 2009 B2
7583136 Pelly Sep 2009 B2
7656103 Shteynberg et al. Feb 2010 B2
7667986 Artusi et al. Feb 2010 B2
7710047 Shteynberg et al. May 2010 B2
7719246 Melanson May 2010 B2
7719248 Melanson May 2010 B1
7746043 Melanson Jun 2010 B2
7746671 Radecker et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750615 Jung et al. Jul 2010 B2
7750738 Bach Jul 2010 B2
7756896 Feingold Jul 2010 B1
7777563 Midya et al. Aug 2010 B2
7804256 Melanson Sep 2010 B2
7804480 Jeon et al. Sep 2010 B2
7923973 Odell Apr 2011 B2
8040114 Saint-Pierre Oct 2011 B2
20020065583 Okada May 2002 A1
20020145041 Muthu et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020150151 Krone et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020166073 Nguyen et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020186010 Kliemannel Dec 2002 A1
20030095013 Melanson et al. May 2003 A1
20030174520 Bimbaud Sep 2003 A1
20030223255 Ben-Yaakov Dec 2003 A1
20040004465 McGinnis Jan 2004 A1
20040046683 Mitamura et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040085030 Laflamme et al. May 2004 A1
20040085117 Melbert et al. May 2004 A1
20040169477 Yancie et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040227571 Kuribayashi Nov 2004 A1
20040228116 Miller et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040232971 Kawasaki et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040239262 Ido et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050057237 Clavel Mar 2005 A1
20050156770 Melanson Jul 2005 A1
20050168492 Hekstra et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050184895 Petersen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050197952 Shea et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050207190 Gritter Sep 2005 A1
20050218838 Lys Oct 2005 A1
20050222881 Booker Oct 2005 A1
20050253533 Lys et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050270813 Zhang et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050275354 Hausman, Jr. et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050275386 Jepsen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002110 Dowling Jan 2006 A1
20060022916 Aiello Feb 2006 A1
20060023002 Hara et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060116898 Peterson Jun 2006 A1
20060125420 Boone et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060184414 Pappas et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060214603 Oh et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060226795 Walter et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238136 Johnson, III et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060261754 Lee Nov 2006 A1
20060285365 Huynh et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070024213 Shteynberg et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070029946 Yu et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070040512 Jungwirth et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070053182 Robertson Mar 2007 A1
20070055564 Fourman Mar 2007 A1
20070096717 Ishihara May 2007 A1
20070103949 Tsuruya May 2007 A1
20070124615 Orr May 2007 A1
20070126656 Huang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070182699 Ha et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070285031 Shteynberg et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080012502 Lys Jan 2008 A1
20080027841 Eder Jan 2008 A1
20080043504 Ye et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080054815 Kotikalapoodi et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080094055 Monreal et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080116818 Shteynberg et al. May 2008 A1
20080130322 Artusi et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080130336 Taguchi Jun 2008 A1
20080150433 Tsuchida et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154679 Wade Jun 2008 A1
20080174291 Hansson et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080174372 Tucker et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175029 Jung et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080192509 Dhuyvetter et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080224635 Hayes Sep 2008 A1
20080232141 Artusi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080239764 Jacques et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080259655 Wei et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080278132 Kesterson et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080278891 Bidenbach et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090067204 Ye et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090070188 Scott et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090147544 Melanson Jun 2009 A1
20090174479 Yan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090218960 Lyons et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100072956 Fiebrich et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100141317 Szajnowski Jun 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
19713814 Oct 1998 DE
0585789 Mar 1994 EP
0632679 Jan 1995 EP
0838791 Apr 1998 EP
0910168 Apr 1999 EP
1014563 Jun 2000 EP
1164819 Dec 2001 EP
1213823 Jun 2002 EP
1460775 Sep 2004 EP
1528785 May 2005 EP
2204905 AL Jul 2010 EP
2069269 Aug 1981 GB
WO 2006022107 Mar 2006 JP
WO9725836 Jul 1997 WO
0115316 Jan 2001 WO
0197384 Dec 2001 WO
0215386 Feb 2002 WO
WO0227944 Apr 2002 WO
02091805 Nov 2002 WO
WO2006013557 Feb 2006 WO
2006067521 Jun 2006 WO
WO2006135584 Dec 2006 WO
2007026170 Mar 2007 WO
2007079362 Jul 2007 WO
WO2008072160 Jun 2008 WO
WO20080152838 Dec 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (166)
Entry
D. Hausman, Lutron, RTISS-TE Operation, Real-Time Illumination Stability Systems for Trailing-Edge (Reverse Phase Control) Dimmers, v. 1.0 Dec. 2004.
International Rectifier, Data Sheet No. PD60230 revC, IR1150(S)(PbF), uPFC One Cycle Control PFC IC Feb. 5, 2007.
Texas Instruments, Application Report SLUA308, UCC3817 Current Sense Transformer Evaluation, Feb. 2004.
Texas Instruments, Application Report SPRA902A, Average Current Mode Controlled Power Factor Correctiom Converter using TMS320LF2407A, Jul. 2005.
Unitrode, Design Note DN-39E, Optimizing Performance in UC3854 Power Factor Correction Applications, Nov. 1994.
Fairchild Semiconductor, Application Note 42030, Theory and Application of the ML4821 Average Currrent Mode PFC Controller, Aug. 1997.
Fairchild Semiconductor, Application Note AN4121, Design of Power Factor Correction Circuit Using FAN7527B, Rev.1.0.1, May 30, 2002.
Fairchild Semiconductor, Application Note 6004, 500W Power-Factor-Corrected (PFC) Converter Design with FAN4810, Rev. 1.0.1, Oct. 31, 2003.
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN4822, ZVA Average Current PFC Controller, Rev. 1.0.1 Aug. 10, 2001.
Fairchild Semiconductor, ML4821, Power Factor Controller, Rev. 1.0.2, Jun. 19, 2001.
Fairchild Semiconductor, ML4812, Power Factor Controller, Rev. 1.0.4, May 31, 2001.
Linear Technology, 100 Watt LED Driver, Linear Technology, 2006.
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN7544, Simple Ballast Controller, Rev. 1.0.0, 2004.
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN7532, Ballast Controller, Rev. 1.0.2, Jun. 2006.
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN7711, Ballast Control IC, Rev. 1.0.2, Mar. 2007.
Fairchild Semiconductor, KA7541, Simple Ballast Controller, Rev. 1.0.3, 2001.
ST Microelectronics, L6574, CFL/TL Ballast Driver Preheat and Dimming, Sep. 2003.
ST Microelectronics, AN993, Application Note, Electronic Ballast with PFC Using L6574 and L6561, May 2004.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/062384 dated Jan. 14, 2008.
S. Dunlap et al., Design of Delta-Sigma Modulated Switching Power Supply, Circuits & Systems, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium, 1998.
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Dimmable Light Ballast with Power Factor Correction, Design Reference Manual, DRM067, Rev. 1, Dec. 2005.
J. Zhou et al., Novel Sampling Algorithm for DSP Controlled 2 kW PFC Converter, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 16, No. 2, Mar. 2001.
A. Prodic, Compensator Design and Stability Assessment for Fast Voltage Loops of Power Factor Correction Rectifiers, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, No. 5, Sep. 2007.
M. Brkovic et al., “Automatic Current Shaper with Fast Output Regulation and Soft-Switching,” S.15.0 Power Converters, Telecommunications Energy Conference, 1993.
Dallas Semiconductor, Maxim, “Charge-Pump and Step-Up DC-DC Converter Solutions for Powering White LEDs in Series or Parallel Connections,” Apr. 23, 2002.
Freescale Semiconductor, AN3052, Implementing PFC Average Current Mode Control Using the MC9S12E128, Nov. 2005.
D. Maksimovic et al., “Switching Converters with Wide DC Conversion Range,” Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineer's (IEEE) Transactions on Power Electronics, Jan. 1991.
V. Nguyen et al., “Tracking Control of Buck Converter Using Sliding-Mode with Adaptive Hysteresis,” Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1995. PESC apos; 95 Record., 26th Annual IEEE vol. 2, Issue , Jun. 18-22, 1995 pp. 1086-1093.
S. Zhou et al., “A High Efficiency, Soft Switching DC-DC Converter with Adaptive Current-Ripple Control for Portable Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—II: Express Briefs, vol. 53, No. 4, Apr. 2006.
K. Leung et al., “Use of State Trajectory Prediction in Hysteresis Control for Achieving Fast Transient Response of the Buck Converter,” Circuits and Systems, 2003. ISCAS apos;03. Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium, vol. 3, Issue , May 25-28, 2003 pp. III-439-III-442 vol. 3.
K. Leung et al., “Dynamic Hysteresis Band Control of the Buck Converter with Fast Transient Response,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—II: Express Briefs, vol. 52, No. 7, Jul. 2005.
Y. Ohno, Spectral Design Considerations for White LED Color Rendering, Final Manuscript, Optical Engineering, vol. 44, 111302 (2005).
S. Skogstad et al., A Proposed Stability Characterization and Verification Method for High-Order Single-Bit Delta-Sigma Modulators, Norchip Conference, Nov. 2006 http://folk.uio.no/savskogs/pub/A—Proposed—Stability—Characterization.pdf.
J. Turchi, Four Key Steps to Design a Continuous Conduction Mode PFC Stage Using the NCP1653, ON Semiconductor, Publication Order No. AND184/D, Nov. 2004.
Megaman, D or S Dimming ESL, Product News, Mar. 15, 2007.
J. Qian et al., New Charge Pump Power-Factor-Correction Electronic Ballast with a Wide Range of Line Input Voltage, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 14, No. 1, Jan. 1999.
P. Green, A Ballast that can be Dimmed from a Domestic (Phase-Cut) Dimmer, IRPLCFL3 rev. b, International Rectifier, http://www.irf.com/technical-info/refdesigns/cfl-3.pdf, printed Mar. 24, 2007.
J. Qian et al., Charge Pump Power-Factor-Correction Technologies Part II: Ballast Applications, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 2000.
Chromacity Shifts in High-Power White LED Systems due to Different Dimming Methods, Solid-State Lighting, http://www.lrc.rpi.edu/programs/solidstate/completedProjects.asp?ID=76, printed May 3, 2007.
S. Chan et al., Design and Implementation of Dimmable Electronic Ballast Based on Integrated Inductor, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2007.
M. Madigan et al., Integrated High-Quality Rectifier-Regulators, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 46, No. 4, Aug. 1999.
T. Wu et al., Single-Stage Electronic Ballast with Dimming Feature and Unity Power Factor, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 13, No. 3, May 1998.
F. Tao et al., “Single-Stage Power-Factor-Correction Electronic Ballast with a Wide Continuous Dimming Control for Fluorescent Lamps,” IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, vol. 2, 2001.
Azoteq, IQS17 Family, IQ Switch®—ProxSense™ Series, Touch Sensor, Load Control and User Interface, IQS17 Datasheet V2.00.doc, Jan. 2007.
C. Dilouie, Introducing the LED Driver, EC&M, Sep. 2004.
S. Lee et al., TRIAC Dimmable Ballast with Power Equalization, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 20, No. 6, Nov. 2005.
L. Gonthier et al., EN55015 Compliant 500W Dimmer with Low-Losses Symmetrical Switches, 2005 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Sep. 2005.
Why Different Dimming Ranges? The Difference Between Measured and Perceived Light, 2000 http://www.lutron.com/ballast/pdf/LutronBallastpg3.pdf.
D. Hausman, Real-Time Illumination Stability Systems for Trailing-Edge (Reverse Phase Control) Dimmers, Technical White Paper, Lutron, version 1.0, Dec. 2004, http://www.lutron.com/technical—info/pdf/RTISS-TE.pdf.
Light Dimmer Circuits, www.epanorama.net/documents/lights/lightdimmer.html, printed Mar. 26, 2007.
Light Emitting Diode, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light-emitting—diode, printed Mar. 27, 2007.
Color Temperature, www.sizes.com/units/color—temperature.htm, printed Mar. 27, 2007.
S. Lee et al., A Novel Electrode Power Profiler for Dimmable Ballasts Using DC Link Voltage and Switching Frequency Controls, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 3, May 2004.
Y. Ji et al., Compatibility Testing of Fluorescent Lamp and Ballast Systems, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 35, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999.
National Lighting Product Information Program, Specifier Reports, “Dimming Electronic Ballasts,” vol. 7, No. 3, Oct. 1999.
Supertex Inc., Buck-based LED Drivers Using the HV9910B, Application Note AN-H48, Dec. 28, 2007.
D. Rand et al., Issues, Models and Solutions for Triac Modulated Phase Dimming of LED Lamps, Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2007.
Supertex Inc., HV9931 Unity Power Factor LED Lamp Driver, Application Note AN-H52, Mar. 7, 2007.
Supertex Inc., 56W Off-line LED Driver, 120VAC with PFC, 160V, 350mA Load, Dimmer Switch Compatible, DN-H05, Feb. 2007.
ST Microelectronics, Power Factor Corrector L6561, Jun. 2004.
Fairchild Semiconductor, Application Note 42047 Power Factor Correction (PFC) Basics, Rev. 0.9.0 Aug. 19, 2004.
M. Radecker et al., Application of Single-Transistor Smart-Power IC for Fluorescent Lamp Ballast, Thirty-Fourth Annual Industry Applications Conference IEEE, vol. 1, Oct. 3, 1999-Oct. 7, 1999.
M. Rico-Secades et al., Low Cost Electronic Ballast for a 36-W Fluorescent Lamp Based on a Current-Mode-Controlled Boost Inverter for a 120-V DC Bus Power Distribution, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 21, No. 4, Jul. 2006.
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN4800, Low Start-up Current PFC/PWM Controller Combos, Nov. 2006.
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN4810, Power Factor Correction Controller, Sep. 24, 2003.
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN4822, ZVS Average Current PFC Controller, Aug. 10, 2001.
Fairchild Semiconductor, FAN7527B, Power Factor Correction Controller, 2003.
Fairchild Semiconductor, ML4821, Power Factor Controller, Jun. 19, 2001.
Freescale Semiconductor, AN1965, Design of Indirect Power Factor Correction Using 56F800/E, Jul. 2005.
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/051072, mailed Jun. 4, 2008.
“HV9931 Unity Power Factor LED Lamp Driver, Initial Release”, Supertex Inc., Sunnyvale, CA USA 2005.
AN-H52 Application Note: “HV9931 Unity Power Factor LED Lamp Driver” Mar. 7, 2007, Supertex Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Dustin Rand et al: “Issues, Models and Solutions for Triac Modulated Phase Dimming of LED Lamps” Power Electronics Specialists Conferrence, 2007. PESC 2007. IEEE, IEEE, P1, Jun. 1, 2007, pp. 1398-1404.
Spiazzi G et al: “Analysis of a High-Power Factor Electronic Ballast for High Brightness Light Emitting Diodes” Power Electronics Specialists, 2005 IEEE 36th Conference on Jun. 12, 2005, Piscatawa, NJ, USA, IEEE, Jun. 12, 2005, pp. 1494-1499.
International Search Report PCT/US2008/062381 dated Feb. 5, 2008.
International Search Report PCT/US2008/056739 dated Dec. 3, 2008.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/US2008/062381 dated Feb. 5, 2008.
Ben-Yaakov et al, “The Dynamics of a PWM Boost Converter with Resistive Input” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA, vol. 46, No. 3, Jun. 1, 1999.
International Search Report PCT/US2008/062398 dated Feb. 5, 2008.
Partial International Search Report PCT/US2008/062387 dated Feb. 5, 2008.
Noon, Jim “UC3855A/B High Performance Power Factor Preregulator”, Texas Instruments, SLUA146A, May 1996, Revised Apr. 2004.
International Search Report PCT/GB2006/003259 dated Jan. 12, 2007.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/US2008/056739 dated Dec. 3, 2008.
International Search Report PCT/US2008/056606 dated Dec. 3, 2008.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/US2008/056606 dated Dec. 3, 2008.
International Search Report PCT/US2008/056608 dated Dec. 3, 2008.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/US2008/056608 dated Dec. 3, 2008.
International Search Report PCT/GB2005/050228 dated Mar. 14, 2006.
International Search Report PCT/US2008/062387 dated Jan. 10, 2008.
Data Sheet LT3496 Triple Output LED Driver, Linear Technology Corporation, Milpitas, CA 2007.
Linear Technology, News Release,Triple Output LED, LT3496, Linear Technology, Milpitas, CA, May 24, 2007.
Mamano, Bob, “Current Sensing Solutions for Power Supply Designers”, Unitrode Seminar Notes SEM1200, 1999.
http://toolbarpdf.com/docs/functions-and-features-of-inverters.html printed on Jan. 20, 2011.
Linear Technology, “Single Switch PWM Controller with Auxiliary Boost Converter,” LT1950 Datasheet, Linear Technology, Inc. Milpitas, CA, 2003.
Yu, Zhenyu, 3.3V DSP for Digital Motor Control, Texas Instruments, Application Report SPRA550 dated Jun. 1999.
International Rectifier, Data Sheet No. PD60143-O, Current Sensing Single Channel Driver, El Segundo, CA, dated Sep. 8, 2004.
Balogh, Laszlo, “Design and Application Guide for High Speed MOSFET Gate Drive Circuits” [Online] 2001, Texas Instruments, Inc., SEM-1400, Unitrode Power Supply Design Seminar, Topic II, TI literature No. SLUP133, XP002552367, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:htt/://focus.ti.com/lit/ml/slup169/slup169.pdf the whole document.
ST Datasheet L6562, Transition-Mode PFC Controller, 2005, STMicroelectronics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Maksimovic, Regan Zane and Robert Erickson, Impact of Digital Control in Power Electronics, Proceedings of 2004 International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices & Ics, Kitakyushu Apr. 5, 2010, Colorado Power Electronics Center, ECE Department, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Texas Instruments, 8-Pin Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM) PFC Controller, UCC28019A, SLUS828B, Dec. 2008, Revised Apr. 2009.
Allegro, A1442 Low Voltage Full Bridge Brushless DC Motor Driver with Hall Commutation and Soft-Switching, and Reverse Battery, Short Circuit, and Thermal Shutdown Protection, printed Mar. 27, 2009.
Texas Instruments, Interleaving Continuous Conduction Mode PFC Controller, UCC28070, SLUS794C, Nov. 2007, revised Jun. 2009, Texas Instruments, Dallas TX.
Infineon, CCM-PFC Standalone Power Factor Correction (PFC) Controller in Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM), Version 2.1, Feb. 6, 2007.
International Rectifier, IRAC1150-300W Demo Board, User's Guide, Rev 3.0, Aug. 2, 2005.
International Rectifier, Application Note AN-1077,PFC Converter Design with IR1150 One Cycle Control IC, rev. 2.3, Jun. 2005.
International Rectifier, Data Sheet PD60230 revC, Feb. 5, 2007.
Lu et al, International Rectifier, Bridgeless PFC Implementation Using One Cycle Control Technique, 2005.
Linear Technology, LT1248, Power Factor Controller, Apr. 20, 2007.
ON Semiconductor, AND8123/D, Power Factor Correction Stages Operating in Critical Conduction Mode, Sep. 2003.
ON Semiconductor, MC33260, GreenLine Compact Power Factor Controller: Innovative Circuit for Cost Effective Solutions, Sep. 2005.
ON Semiconductor, NCP1605, Enhanced, High Voltage and Efficient Standby Mode, Power Factor Controller, Feb. 2007.
ON Semconductor, NCP1606, Cost Effective Power Factor Controller, Mar. 2007.
ON Semiconductor, NCP1654, Product Review, Power Factor Controller for Compact and Robust, Continuous Conduction Mode Pre-Converters, Mar. 2007.
Philips, Application Note, 90W Resonant SMPS with TEA1610 SwingChip, AN99011, 1999.
NXP, TEA1750, GreenChip III SMPS control IC Product Data Sheet, Apr. 6, 2007.
Renesas, HA16174P/FP, Power Factor Correction Controller IC, Jan. 6, 2006.
Renesas Technology Releases Industry's First Critical-Conduction-Mode Power Factor Correction Control IC Implementing Interleaved Operation, Dec. 18, 2006.
Renesas, Application Note R2A20111 EVB, PFC Control IC R2A20111 Evaluation Board, Feb. 2007.
STMicroelectronics, L6563, Advanced Transition-Mode PFC Controller, Mar. 2007.
Texas Instruments, Application Note SLUA321, Startup Current Transient of the Leading Edge Triggered PFC Controllers, Jul. 2004.
Texas Instruments, Application Report, SLUA309A, Avoiding Audible Noise at Light Loads when using Leading Edge Triggered PFC Converters, Sep. 2004.
Texas Instruments, Application Report SLUA369B, 350-W, Two-Phase Interleaved PFC Pre-Regulator Design Review, Mar. 2007.
Unitrode, High Power-Factor Preregulator, Oct. 1994.
Texas Instruments, Transition Mode PFC Controller, SLUS515D, Jul. 2005.
Unitrode Products From Texas Instruments, Programmable Output Power Factor Preregulator, Dec. 2004.
Unitrode Products From Texas Instruments, High Performance Power Factor Preregulator, Oct. 2005.
Texas Instruments, UCC3817 BiCMOS Power Factor Preregulator Evaluation Board User's Guide, Nov. 2002.
Unitrode, L. Balogh, Design Note UC3854A/B and UC3855A/B Provide Power Limiting with Sinusoidal Input Current for PFC Front Ends, SLUA196A, Nov. 2001.
A. Silva De Morais et al., A High Power Factor Ballast Using a Single Switch with Both Power Stages Integrated, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 21, No. 2, Mar. 2006.
M. Ponce et al., High-Efficient Integrated Electronic Ballast for Compact Fluorescent Lamps, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 21, No. 2, Mar. 2006.
A. R. Seidel et al., A Practical Comparison Among High-Power-Factor Electronic Ballasts with Similar Ideas, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2005.
F. T. Wakabayashi et al, An Improved Design Procedure for LCC Resonant Filter of Dimmable Electronic Ballasts for Fluorescent Lamps, Based on Lamp Model, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 20, No. 2, Sep. 2005.
J. A. Vilela Jr. et al, An Electronic Ballast with High Power Factor and Low Voltage Stress, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 41, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2005.
S. T.S. Lee et al., Use of Saturable Inductor to Improve the Dimming Characteristics of Frequency-Controlled Dimmable Electronic Ballasts, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 6, Nov. 2004.
M. K. Kazimierczuk et al., Electronic Ballast for Fluorescent Lamps, IEEETransactions on Power Electronics, vol. 8, No. 4, Oct. 1993.
S. Ben-Yaakov et al., Statics and Dynamics of Fluorescent Lamps Operating at High Frequency: Modeling and Simulation, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 38, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2002.
H. L. Cheng et al., A Novel Single-Stage High-Power-Factor Electronic Ballast with Symmetrical Topology, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 50, No. 4, Aug. 2003.
J.W.F. Dorleijn et al., Standardisation of the Static Resistances of Fluorescent Lamp Cathodes and New Data for Preheating, Industry Applications Conference, vol. 1, Oct. 13, 2002-Oct. 18, 2002.
Q. Li et al., An Analysis of the ZVS Two-Inductor Boost Converter under Variable Frequency Operation, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2007.
H. Peng et al, Modeling of Quantization Effects in Digitally Controlled DC-DC Converters, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2007.
G. Yao et al., Soft Switching Circuit for Interleaved Boost Converters, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2007.
C. M. De Oliviera Stein et al., A ZCT Auxiliary Communication Circuit for Interleaved Boost Converters Operating in Critical Conduction Mode, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 17, No. 6, Nov. 2002.
W. Zhang et al., A New Duty Cycle Control Strategy for Power Factor Correction and FPGA Implementation, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 21, No. 6, Nov. 2006.
H. Wu et al., Single Phase Three-Level Power Factor Correction Circuit with Passive Lossless Snubber, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 17, No. 2, Mar. 2006.
O. Garcia et al., High Efficiency PFC Converter to Meet EN61000-3-2 and A14, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, vol. 3, 2002.
P. Lee et al., Steady-State Analysis of an Interleaved Boost Converter with Coupled Inductors, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, No. 4, Aug. 2000.
D.K.W. Cheng et al., A New Improved Boost Converter with Ripple Free Input Current Using Coupled Inductors, Power Electronics and Variable Speed Drives, Sep. 21-23, 1998.
B.A. Miwa et al., High Efficiency Power Factor Correction Using Interleaved Techniques, Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Seventh Annual Conference Proceedings, Feb. 23-27, 1992.
Z. Lai et al., A Family of Power-Factor-Correction Controllers, Twelfth Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, vol. 1, Feb. 23, 1997-Feb. 27, 1997.
L. Balogh et al., Power-Factor Correction with Interleaved Boost Converters in Continuous-Inductor-Current Mode, Eighth Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 1993. APEC '93. Conference Proceedings, Mar. 7, 1993-Mar. 11, 1993.
Fairchild Semiconductor, Application Note 42030, Theory and Application of the ML4821 Average Current Mode PFC Controller, Oct. 25, 2000.
Unitrode Products From Texas Instruments, BiCMOS Power Factor Preregulator, Feb. 2006.
Power Integrations, Inc., “TOP200-4/14 TOPSwitch Family Three-terminal Off-line PWM Switch”, XP-002524650, Jul. 1996, Sunnyvale, California.
Texas Instruments, SLOS318F, “High-Speed, Low Noise, Fully-Differential I/O Amplifiers,” THS4130 and THS4131, US, Jan. 2006.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT US20080062387, dated Feb. 5, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT US200900032358, dated Jan. 29, 2009.
Hirota, Atsushi et al, “Analysis of Single Switch Delta-Sigma Modulated Pulse Space Modulation PFC Converter Effectively Using Switching Power Device,” IEEE, US, 2002.
Prodic, Aleksandar, “Digital Controller for High-Frequency Rectifiers with Power Factor Correction Suitable for On-Chip Implementation,” IEEE, US, 2007.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT US20080062378, dated Feb. 5, 2008.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT US20090032351, dated Jan. 29, 2009.
Erickson, Robert W. et al, “Fundamentals of Power Electronics,” Second Edition, Chapter 6, Boulder, CO, 2001.
Prodic, A. et al, “Dead Zone Digital Controller for Improved Dynamic Response of Power Factor Preregulators,” IEEE, 2003.
International Search Report and Written Report PCT US20080062428 dated Feb. 5, 2008.
Analog Devices, “120 kHz Bandwidth, Low Distortion, Isolation Amplifier”, AD215, Norwood, MA, 1996.
Burr-Brown, ISO120 and ISO121, “Precision Los Cost Isolation Amplifier,” Tucson AZ, Mar. 1992.
Burr-Brown, ISO130, “High IMR, Low Cost Isolation Amplifier,” SBOS220, US, Oct. 2001.