1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to the field of signal processing, and, more specifically, to a switch-mode converter operating in a hybrid discontinuous conduction mode (DCM)/continuous conduction mode (CCM).
2. Description of the Related Art
Switch-mode converters are Direct Current (DC) to Direct Current (DC) converters that convert from one DC voltage level to another DC voltage level. A switch-mode converter operates by temporarily storing input energy at one voltage level and respectively releasing the energy at its output at a different voltage level. Two main exemplary switch-mode converters are a switch-mode boost converter and a switch-mode buck converter Both of these switch-mode converters are well known in the art.
An exemplary switch-mode boost converter/stage 102 is shown in a typical exemplary power factor corrector 100 in
Voltage source 101 supplies an alternating current (AC) input voltage Vin(t) to a full-wave diode bridge rectifier 103. The voltage source 101 (e.g., voltage Vin(t)) is, for example, a public utility, such as a 60 Hz/120 V line (mains) voltage in the United States of America or a 50 Hz/230 V line (mains) voltage in Europe. The input rate associated with input voltage Vin(t) is the frequency of voltage source 101 (e.g., 60 Hz in the U.S. and 50 Hz. in Europe). The rectifier 103 rectifies the input voltage Vin(t) and supplies a rectified, time-varying, line input voltage Vx(t) to the switch-mode boost stage 102. The actual voltage at any time t is referred to as the instantaneous input voltage. Unless otherwise stated, the term “line rate” is hereafter referred to and defined as the rectified input frequency associated with the rectified line voltage Vx(t). The line rate is also equal to twice the input frequency associated with input voltage Vin(t). The rectified line input voltage is measured and provided in terms of Root Mean Square (RMS) voltage, e.g., Vrms.
The switch-mode boost converter/stage 102 includes a switch 108 (e.g., Field Effect Transistor (FET)) by which it is controlled and provides power factor correction (PFC) in accordance with how switch 108 is controlled. The switch-mode boost converter/stage 102 is also controlled by switch 108 and regulates the transfer of energy from the rectified line input voltage Vx(t) through inductor 110 to capacitor 106 via a diode 111. The inductor current iL ramps ‘up’ when the switch 108 conducts, i.e. is “ON”. The inductor current it, ramps down when switch 108 is nonconductive, i.e. is “OFF”, and supplies current iL to recharge capacitor 106. The time period during which inductor current iL ramps down is commonly referred to as the “inductor flyback time”.
A switch-mode converter controller 114, such as an exemplary power factor correction (PFC) controller, controls switch 108. Switch-mode converter controller 114 controls switch 108 and, thus, controls power factor correction and regulates output power of the switch-mode boost converter/stage 102. The goal of power factor correction technology is to make the switch-mode boost converter/stage 102 appear resistive to the voltage source 101. Thus, the switch-mode converter controller 114 attempts to control the inductor current iL so that the average inductor current iL is linearly and directly related to the rectified line input voltage Vx(t). Unitrode Products Datasheet entitled “UCC2817, UCC2818, UCC3817, UCC3818 BiCMOS Power Factor Preregulator” (SLUS3951) dated February 2000-Revised February 2006 by Texas Instruments Incorporated, Copyright 2006-2007 (referred to herein as “Unitrode datasheet”) and International Rectifier Datasheet entitled “Datasheet No. PD60230 rev C IR1150(S(PbF) and IR 11501(S)(PbF)” dated Feb. 5, 2007 by International Rectifier, describe examples of a PFC controller. The PFC controller supplies a pulse width modulated (PWM) control signal CS0 to control the conductivity of switch 108.
Two modes of switching stage operation exist: Discontinuous Conduction Mode (“DCM”) and Continuous Conduction Mode (“CCM”). In DCM, switch 108 of switch-mode converter controller 114 (or boost converter) is turned on (e.g., “ON”) when the inductor current iL equals zero. In CCM, switch 108 of switch-mode converter controller 114 (or boost converter) switches “ON” when the inductor current is non-zero, and the current in the energy transfer inductor 110 never reaches zero during the switching cycle. In CCM, the current swing is less than in DCM, which results in lower I2R power losses and lower ripple current for inductor current iL which results in lower inductor core losses. The lower voltage swing also reduces Electro Magnetic Interference (EMI), and a smaller input filter can then be used. Since switch 108 is turned “OFF” when the inductor current iL is not equal to zero, diode 111 needs to be very fast in terms of reverse recovery in order to minimize losses.
The switching rate for switch 108 is typically operated in the range of 20 kHz to 100 kHz. Slower switching frequencies are avoided in order to avoid the human audio frequency range as well as avoid increasing the size of inductor 110. Faster switching frequencies are typically avoided since they increase the switching losses and are more difficult to use in terms of meeting Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) standards.
Capacitor 106 supplies stored energy to load 112. The capacitor 106 is sufficiently large so as to maintain a substantially constant link output voltage Vc(t) through the cycle of the line rate. The link output voltage Vc(t) remains substantially constant during constant load conditions. However, as load conditions change, the link output voltage Vc(t) changes. The switch-mode converter controller 114 responds to the changes in link output voltage Vc(t) and adjusts the control signal CS0 to resume a substantially constant output voltage as quickly as possible. The switch-mode converter controller 114 includes a small capacitor 115 to prevent any high frequency switching signals from the line (mains) input voltage Vin(t).
Switch-mode converter controller 114 receives two feedback signals, the rectified line input voltage Vx(t) and the link output voltage Vc(t), via a wide bandwidth current loop 116 and a slower voltage loop 118. The rectified line input voltage Vx(t) is sensed from node 120 between the diode rectifier 103 and inductor 110. The link output voltage Vc(t) is sensed from node 122 between diode 111 and load 112. The current loop 116 operates at a frequency fc that is sufficient to allow the switch-mode converter controller 114 to respond to changes in the rectified line input voltage Vx(t) and cause the inductor current iL to track the rectified line input voltage Vx(t) to provide power factor correction. The inductor current iL controlled by the current loop 116 has a control bandwidth of 5 kHz to 10 kHz. The voltage loop 118 operates at a much slower frequency control bandwidth of about 5 Hz to 20 Hz. By operating at 5 Hz to 20 Hz, the voltage loop 118 functions as a low pass filter to filter a harmonic ripple component of the link output voltage Vc(t).
Switch-mode buck converter 150 includes switch 108 coupled in series with inductor 110. One end of diode 111 is coupled between switch 108 and inductor 110 at the positive side of the input voltage Vin. The other end of diode 111 is coupled to the negative side of input voltage Vin. Capacitor 106 is coupled across the output voltage Vout. In contrast, for a switch-mode buck converter (e.g., switch-mode buck converter 150), the average inductor current is the output current of the buck converter, and the input current is approximately calculated as:
Iin=Iout*Vout/Vin Equation A
This mode of operation for the switch-mode buck converter requires the output voltage Vout to be less than the input voltage Vin. In some applications, the output current Iout is directly controlled, such as for LED lighting. In other applications, the output voltage Vout requires regulation, and current control is still desirable. In
With reference now to
With reference now to
Several advantages of operating the switch-mode converter (e.g., switch-mode boost converter 102) in CCM exist. For example, “shoot-through” conduction, in which the diode (e.g., diode 111) and the switch (e.g., switch 108) are both on for the same (transient) time, does not exist. The switch (e.g., switch 108) always turns on with zero current (other than for parasitics). These advantages allow for good switch-mode conversion efficiency at low cost. Also, the control of the switch for the switch-mode converter can be entirely open loop, with no need to sense the actual inductor current.
However, there are disadvantages for operating a switch-mode converter in CCM. One disadvantage is that high ripple in the inductor current (e.g., inductor current iL) exists. The switch-mode converter in CCM also has a limited power range. In CCM, the switch-mode converter has a peak current that is limited by the saturation limit of the inductor. The switch-mode converter in CCM is also limited by the current capability of the switch (e.g., switch 108) and diode (e.g., diode 111).
In various instances, transient power produced from a system utilizing a switch-mode converter is, higher than the rated maximum. In a pure DCM system, components must be rated for the peak transient. Thus, it may be desired to allow a system with a switch-mode converter operating in DCM to enter into CCM operation on a temporary basis to allow the system to deliver more power. However, controlling such a system in CCM without current sensing has made for unreliable designs, as the inductor current can easily “run away” and become excessive.
Thus, it is needed and desired to provide a switch-mode converter that can operate in a mode that has the advantages of both DCM and CCM and that minimizes or eliminates at least some of the disadvantages of operating in CCM and/or DCM. It is further needed and desired to provide a way to operate the switch-mode converter in a hybrid DCM/CCM mode and to be able to operate in such a mode such that current sensing is not required. It is additionally needed and desired to be able to operate such a switch-mode converter in a hybrid DCM/CCM that can be used in a PFC system as well as for a number of other applications.
A switching converter controller and method that use a finite state machine configured to operate and control a switch-mode converter in a hybrid discontinuous conduction mode (DCM)/continuous conduction mode (CCM) mode are disclosed. The switch-mode converter has a switch and an inductor coupled to the switch, and the switch-mode converter receives an input voltage and provides an output voltage. The hybrid mode involves using double (two) or more switching pulses in a switching period of a control signal for controlling the switch-mode converter. The switching period is defined by a switch on-time duration, a switch off-time duration, and an N number of switching pulses. N is an integer greater than one. An inductor current through the inductor of the switch-mode converter is zero before an initial switching pulse, is zero after a last switching pulse, and is non-zero for all other times within the switching period.
In one exemplary embodiment, the N number of switching pulses is set equal two, and the switch-mode converter controller operates the switch-mode converter in a hybrid DCM/CCM double-pulse mode. In another exemplary embodiment, the N number of switching pulses is set equal three, and the switch-mode converter controller operates the switch-mode converter in a hybrid DCM/CCM triple-pulse mode.
In a further exemplary embodiment, for a subsequent switching pulse that is after the initial switching pulse and before the last switching pulse, the switch is turned on for a fraction of the on-time duration and the switch is turned off for the fraction of the off-time duration. The fraction is set to a value that is greater than zero and less than one and is defined by a ratio of a width of the subsequent switching pulse to a width of the initial switching pulse. The fraction can be selected as an exemplary optimal value in a range between 0.25 and 0.50.
Furthermore, the switching converter controller can be used as a power factor correction (PFC) controller for controlling is a switch-mode boost converter of a power factor corrector. Also, the switch-mode converter controller can be implemented on a single integrated circuit.
The present invention may be better understood, and its numerous objects, features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the all by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference number throughout the several figures designates a like or similar element.
The present invention provides a switch-mode converter that operates in a mode, which is defined and disclosed as a hybrid DCM/CCM mode. A switch-mode converter operating in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode has advantages of both DCM and CCM. The hybrid DCM/CCM mode also minimizes or eliminates at least some of the disadvantages of operating in CCM and/or DCM. For example, a switch-mode converter operating in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode does not require the use of current sensing. Significantly more current can be delivered by the hybrid DCM/CCM mode as contrasted with the DCM, given the same power components. Two exemplary embodiments for operating the switch-mode converter will be discussed in detail in this specification: a hybrid DCM/CCM double-pulse mode and a hybrid DCM/CCM triple-pulse mode. However, the present invention is not in any way limited to being implemented by the use of just a double-pulse or triple pulse defined in the switching period, and additional pulses in the switching period may further be added and utilized as well. Practically, the number of pulses implemented in the switching period may be limited by the eventual mismatch between the current in the ideal model and the actual circuit that exists as additional pulses are added and used. Furthermore, such a switch-mode converter operating in a hybrid DCM/CCM can be used in a PFC system as well as for a number of other systems and applications. The systems and applications which incorporate the present invention are not in any way limited to the ones disclosed in this specification.
Switch-mode converter controller 114 of
TT=T1+T2 Equation B
Referring specifically to the example in plot 300, on-time duration T1 is equal to 4 microseconds while off-time duration T2 is equal to 2 microseconds. Thus, the total time period TT for the switching period is 6 microseconds. The ratio of the on-time duration T1 to the off-time duration T2 is determined by the input and output voltages. In implementing a switch control algorithm based on the characteristics in plot 300 of
Generally, the hybrid DCM/CCM mode for a switch mode converter involves adding one or more additional pulses (i.e., adding n pulses) to the switching period to further increase the average current iaverage of the inductor current iL. For example, the hybrid DCM/CCM double-pulse mode involves having two switching pulses P1 and P2 defined in the switching period as shown in plot 302. Switching pulse P2 is defined and used in addition to the switching pulse P1 in the switching period. As another example, the hybrid DCM/CCM triple-pulse mode involves having three switching pulses P1, P2, and P3 defined in the switching period as shown in plot 502. Switching pulses P2 and P3 are defined and used in addition to the switching pulse P1 in the switching period.
The number of n pulses added is limited by the inaccuracy of the current model. Such inaccuracies include mismatches generally caused by parasitic components and non-zero on-voltages. For high voltage systems (e.g., 400 Volts), three to four pulses can be added to the switching period without the occurrence of significant current control error. Thus, these circuit non-idealities drive the average current iaverage for inductor current iL lower than what is modeled by simple mathematics so that destructive operation of the circuit is avoided. The model currents will drift away from the actual currents until such time as the inductor current iL is allowed to go to zero, and the process is re-started. The drift limits the practical number of pulses that can be added to the switching period. The number of subsequently added pulses, and hence additional current capacity, can be increased with more accurate modeling.
The general mathematical relationships for adding pulses (e.g., adding n pulses) in the switching period for controlling a switch in the switch-mode converter so that the switch-mode converter can operate in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode are now discussed. If n number of pulses are added to the switching period, the total charge transferred is defined as:
Total Charge Q=Q1*(1+n(1−(1−r)2)) Equation C
where Q1 is the total charge for a single period of the inductor current iL operating in DCM (and not in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode) operating at the same peak current; n is the number of added pulses; and r is a fraction defined by the ratio of the width of subsequent pulses to the width of the initial pulse. The optimum value selected for r is usually in the range of 0.25 and 0.50.
Since n number of pulses is added to the switching period, the total time duration TT′ (e.g., in
TT′=(T1+T2)*(1+n*r) Equation D
In other words, the total time duration TT′ for the switch-mode converter operating in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode is defined as (1+n*r) longer than the switching time period TT=(T1+T2), that is, the total switching time period defined for when the switch-mode converter simply operates in DCM.
The average current for operating the switch-mode converter in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode is defined as follows:
iaverage=Q/TT′=(Q1*(1+n(1−(1−r)2)))/(T1+T2)*(1+n*r) Equation E
However, the average current (e.g., target current itarget) when the switch-mode converter is operating in DCM is defined as follows:
itarget=Q1/(T1+T2)=Q1/TT Equation F
Thus, operating the switch-mode converter in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode provides an improved/additional average current over and in comparison with operating the switch-mode converter simply in the DCM mode, defined by the following ratio:
iaverage/itarget=(1+n(1−(1−r)2))/(1+n*r) Equation G
In other words, operating the switch-mode converter in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode provides iaverage/itarget more times average current than operating the switch-mode converter simply in DCM. r is selected within the range of 0.25 to 0.50 based on an optimal value calculation. Such a calculation is achieved by performing a derivative on the ratio iaverage/itarget defined in Equation G.
Referring now to the specific example in plot 302 of
In this example of
Total Charge Q=Q1*(1+1(1−(1−0.5)2))=1.75*Q1 Equation H
The total time duration. TT for the switching period is defined as:
In other words, the total time duration TT for the switching period defined when the switch-mode converter is operating in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode (e.g.,
The current comparison ratio between the hybrid DCM/CCM mode and the DCM mode is then calculated as follows:
That is, the average current provided when the switch-mode converter is operating in the hybrid DCM/CCM double-pulse mode is 1.1666 times the average current when the same switch-mode converter is simply operating in DCM. This comparison is shown in
With reference now to
State diagram 400 shows that for this preferred control technique embodiment, FSM algorithm moves to a state S0 in which the timer is reset. At state S0, switch 108 is on, and the timer waits for an on-time duration T1 (e.g., the on-time duration T1 is the on-time duration defined by when the switch-mode converter would have been simply operating in DCM). When the timer reaches the end of the on-time duration T1, the off-time duration T2 (e.g., the off-time duration T2 is the off-time duration defined by when the switch-mode converter would have been simply operating in DCM) is calculated or determined. The FSM algorithm then moves to state S1 in which switch 108 turns off, and the tinier is reset. FSM algorithm stays at state S1 until the timer tracks and waits an off-time duration T2/2.
When the timer reaches the end of the off-time duration T2/2, FSM algorithm then moves to state S2 in which the switch 108 is turned back on. Timer is again reset. FSM algorithm stays at state S2 until the timer tracks and waits an on-time duration T1/2. When the timer reaches the end of the on-time duration T1/2, FSM algorithm then moves to state S3 in which the switch 108 is turned back off. Timer is then reset. FSM algorithm stays at state S3 until the timer tracks and waits the off-time duration T2. FSM algorithm then returns to state S0 and repeats the process therefrom.
Referring now to the specific example in plot 502 of
In this example of
Total Charge Q=Q1*(1+2(1−(1−0.5)2))=2.5*Q1 Equation H
The total time duration TT′ for the switching period is defined as:
In other words, the total time duration TT′ for the switching period defined when the switch-mode converter is operating in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode (e.g.,
The current comparison ratio between the hybrid DCM/CCM mode and the DCM mode is then calculated as follows:
That is, the average current provided when the switch-mode converter is operating in the hybrid DCM/CCM triple-pulse mode is 1.25 times that when the switch-mode converter is simply operating in DCM. This comparison is shown in
With reference now to
State diagram 600 shows that for this preferred control technique embodiment, FSM algorithm moves to a state S0 in which the timer is reset. At state S0, switch 108 is on, and the timer waits for an on-time duration T1 (e.g., the on-time duration T1 is the on-time duration defined by when the switch-mode converter would have been simply operating in DCM). When the timer reaches the end of the on-time duration T1, the off-time duration T2 (e.g., the off-time duration T2 is the off-time duration defined by when the switch-mode converter would have been simply operating in DCM) is calculated or determined. The FSM algorithm then moves to state S1 in which switch 108 turns off, and the timer is reset. FSM algorithm stays at state S1 until the timer tracks and waits an off-time duration T2/2.
When the timer reaches the end of the off-time duration T2/2, FSM algorithm then moves to state S2 in which the switch 108 is turned back on. Timer is again reset. FSM algorithm stays at state S2 until the timer tracks and waits an on-time duration T1/2. When the timer reaches the end of the on-time duration T1/2, FSM algorithm then moves to state S3 in which the switch 108 is turned back off. Timer is then reset. FSM algorithm stays at state S3 until the timer tracks and waits an off-time duration T2/2. When the timer reaches the end of the off-time duration T2/2, FSM algorithm then moves to state S4 in which the switch 108 is turned back on. Timer is again reset. FSM algorithm stays at state S4 until the timer tracks and waits an on-time duration T1/2. When the timer reaches the end of the on-time duration T1/2, FSM algorithm then moves to state S5 in which the switch 108 is turned off. Timer is again reset. FSM algorithm stays at state S5 until the timer tracks and waits an off-time duration T2. FSM algorithm stays at state S5 until the timer tracks and waits the off-time duration T2. FSM algorithm then returns to state S0 and repeats the process therefrom.
With reference now to
Switching of switch 108 may be calculated and performed so that the average current of boost inductor current iL, being the input current, varies proportionately with the rectified line input voltage Vx(t) where the proportionality ratio is selected such that the capacitor link voltage/output voltage Vc(t) is regulated. Switch-mode conversion controller 114 (PFC controller) and its operations and functions can be implemented on a single integrated circuit. A voltage divider comprising resistors R1 and R2 is coupled to the input of the switch-mode converter controller 114 where the input voltage Vx(t) is fed in, and another voltage divider comprising resistors R3 and R4 is coupled to the input of the switch-mode converter controller 114 where the link output voltage Vc(t) is fed in. The values for resistors R1, R2, R3, and R4 are selected so that the voltage dividers scale down the line input voltage Vx(t) and link output voltage Vc(t) to scaled line input voltage VxIC(t) and scaled link output voltage VcIC(t) that can be used for an integrated circuit.
In a power factor corrector, there are times in which extra current is desired for a short period of time. Such exemplary times include but are not limited to the time at the peak of the input sine-wave at low-line operation, during recovery from temporary input sag or brown-out, during start-up, and during load transients. The switch-mode converter controller 114 (e.g., PFC controller) that implements and executes the FSM algorithm (e.g., switch control algorithm) for controlling switch 108 to operate the switch-mode boost converter/stage 102 in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode can provide the advantages of providing such additional current during these times without adding additional components or complexity to the overall power factor corrector. Such advantages can further provide cost-savings and improve efficiency for the overall power factor corrector.
Furthermore, an error may exist between the actually observed off-time duration T2 (e.g., observed as the actual off-time or flyback time of switch 108) and the above mathematically calculated off-time duration T2. Such an error e is calculated as follows:
e=Calculated T2−Observed T2 Equation K
The error e can be compensated by dividing it among and during the off-times provided by the additional pulse(s) such that the current waveform for the inductor current iL (e.g., in
An additional benefit of operating a switch-mode current in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode exists, even when operating it in DCM would be adequate for the required current. For example, when operating the switch-mode converter in the hybrid DCM/CCM mode, the current waveform for the inductor current iL is less repetitive, which causes less radio frequency interference (RFI) than when simply operating the switch-mode converter in DCM.
Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) and 37 C.F.R §1.78 of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/915,547, filed May 2, 2007, and entitled “Power Factor Correction (PFC) Controller Apparatuses and Methods,” and is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3316495 | Sherer | Apr 1967 | A |
3423689 | Miller et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3586988 | Weekes | Jun 1971 | A |
3725804 | Langan | Apr 1973 | A |
3790878 | Brokaw | Feb 1974 | A |
3881167 | Pelton et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4075701 | Hofmann | Feb 1978 | A |
4334250 | Theus | Jun 1982 | A |
4414493 | Henrich | Nov 1983 | A |
4476706 | Hadden et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4677366 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4683529 | Bucher | Jul 1987 | A |
4700188 | James | Oct 1987 | A |
4737658 | Kronmuller et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4797633 | Humphrey | Jan 1989 | A |
4937728 | Leonardi | Jun 1990 | A |
4940929 | Williams | Jul 1990 | A |
4973919 | Allfather | Nov 1990 | A |
4979087 | Sellwood et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4980898 | Silvian | Dec 1990 | A |
4992919 | Lee et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994952 | Silva et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5001620 | Smith | Mar 1991 | A |
5109185 | Ball | Apr 1992 | A |
5121079 | Dargatz | Jun 1992 | A |
5206540 | de Sa e Silva et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5264780 | Bruer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5278490 | Smedley | Jan 1994 | A |
5323157 | Ledzius et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5359180 | Park et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5383109 | Maksimovic et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5424932 | Inou et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5477481 | Kerth | Dec 1995 | A |
5479333 | McCambridge et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481178 | Wilcox et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5565761 | Hwang | Oct 1996 | A |
5589759 | Borgato et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5638265 | Gabor | Jun 1997 | A |
5644214 | Lee | Jul 1997 | A |
5691890 | Hyde | Nov 1997 | A |
5747977 | Hwang | May 1998 | A |
5757635 | Seong | May 1998 | A |
5764039 | Choi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781040 | Myers | Jul 1998 | A |
5783909 | Hochstein | Jul 1998 | A |
5798635 | Hwang et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5900683 | Rinehart et al. | May 1999 | A |
5929400 | Colby et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946202 | Balogh | Aug 1999 | A |
5946206 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952849 | Haigh et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960207 | Brown | Sep 1999 | A |
5963086 | Hall | Oct 1999 | A |
5966297 | Minegishi | Oct 1999 | A |
5994885 | Wilcox et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016038 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6043633 | Lev et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6072969 | Yokomori et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083276 | Davidson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6084450 | Smith et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6150774 | Mueller et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6181114 | Hemena et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6211627 | Callahan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229271 | Liu | May 2001 | B1 |
6229292 | Redl et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246183 | Buonavita | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259614 | Ribarich et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6300723 | Wang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304066 | Wilcox et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304473 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343026 | Perry | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344811 | Melanson | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6385063 | Sadek et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6407691 | Yu | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441558 | Muthu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445600 | Ben-Yaakov | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6452521 | Wang | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469484 | L'Hermite et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6486645 | Van Auken | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495964 | Hayes | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6509913 | Martin, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6580258 | Wilcox et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583550 | Iwasa et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6628106 | Batarseh et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636003 | Rahm et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6646848 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6688753 | Calon et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6713974 | Patchornik et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724174 | Esteves et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727832 | Melanson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737845 | Hwang | May 2004 | B2 |
6741123 | Anderson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6753661 | Muthu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756772 | McGinnis | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6768655 | Yang et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6781351 | Mednik et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788011 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806659 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6839247 | Yang | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6860628 | Robertson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870325 | Bushell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873065 | Haigh et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882552 | Telefus et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6894471 | Corva et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6933706 | Shih | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940733 | Schie et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944034 | Shytenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6956750 | Eason et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6958920 | Mednik et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963496 | Bimbaud | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970503 | Kalb | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975523 | Kim et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980446 | Simada et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7003023 | Krone et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7034611 | Oswal et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7050509 | Krone et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064531 | Zinn | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7075329 | Chen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078963 | Andersen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7088059 | McKinney et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7102902 | Brown et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7106603 | Lin et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7109791 | Epperson et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7126288 | Ribarich et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7145295 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7158633 | Hein | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7161816 | Shytenberg et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7183957 | Melanson | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7221130 | Ribeiro et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7233135 | Noma et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246919 | Porchia et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7266001 | Notohamiprodjo et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7288902 | Melanson | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7292013 | Chen et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7310244 | Yang et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7345458 | Kanai et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7375476 | Walter et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7388764 | Huynh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7394210 | Ashdown | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7511437 | Lys et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7538499 | Ashdown | May 2009 | B2 |
7545130 | Latham | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554473 | Melanson | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7569996 | Holmes et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583136 | Pelly | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7656103 | Shteynberg et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7710047 | Shteynberg et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7719248 | Melanson | May 2010 | B1 |
7746043 | Melanson | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746671 | Radecker et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750738 | Bach | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7804256 | Melanson | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20020145041 | Muthu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150151 | Krone et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166073 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030095013 | Melanson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030174520 | Bimbaud | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030223255 | Ben-Yaakov | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004465 | McGinnis | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040046683 | Mitamura et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040085030 | Laflamme et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085117 | Melbert et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040169477 | Yancie et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040227571 | Kuribayashi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228116 | Miller et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232971 | Kawasaki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239262 | Ido et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263140 | Adragna et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050057237 | Clavel | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050156770 | Melanson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168492 | Hekstra et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050184895 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050207190 | Gritter | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050218838 | Lys | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050253533 | Lys et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050270813 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275354 | Hausman, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050275386 | Jepsen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060022916 | Aiello | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060023002 | Hara et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060125420 | Boone et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060214603 | Oh et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226795 | Walter et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238136 | Johnson, III et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261754 | Lee | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285365 | Huynh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070024213 | Shteynberg et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070029946 | Yu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040512 | Jungwirth et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053182 | Robertson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070103949 | Tsuruya | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124615 | Orr | May 2007 | A1 |
20070182699 | Ha et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080012502 | Lys | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043504 | Ye et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054815 | Kotikalapoodi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080130322 | Artusi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080174291 | Hansson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080174372 | Tucker et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175029 | Jung et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192509 | Dhuyvetter et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224635 | Hayes | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232141 | Artusi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239764 | Jacques et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259655 | Wei et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080278132 | Kesterson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090067204 | Ye et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090147544 | Melanson | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090174479 | Yan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090218960 | Lyons et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0585789 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0910168 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1014563 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1164819 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1213823 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1528785 | May 2005 | EP |
2204905 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2069269 | Aug 1981 | GB |
WO 2006022107 | Mar 2006 | JP |
0115316 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0197384 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0215386 | Feb 2002 | WO |
W00227944 | Apr 2002 | WO |
02091805 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2006067521 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006135584 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007026170 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007079362 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60915547 | May 2007 | US |