The present invention relates in general to board level transmission line drivers and receivers, and in particular, to references for differential and pseudo-differential drivers and receivers.
Digital computer systems have a history of continually increasing the speed of the processors used in the system. As computer systems have migrated towards multiprocessor systems, sharing information between processors and memory systems has also generated a requirement for increased speed for the off-chip communication networks. Designers usually have more control over on-chip communication paths than for off-chip communication paths. Off-chip communication paths are longer, have higher noise, impedance mismatches, and have more discontinuities than on-chip communication paths. Since off-chip communication paths are of lower impedance, they require more current and thus more power to drive.
When using inter-chip high-speed signaling, noise and coupling between signal lines (cross talk) affects signal quality. One way to alleviate the detrimental effects of noise and coupling is through the use of differential signaling. Differential signaling comprises sending a signal and its compliment to a differential receiver. In this manner, noise and coupling affect both the signal and the compliment equally. The differential receiver only senses the difference between the signal and its compliment as the noise and coupling represent common mode signals. Therefore, differential signaling is resistant to the effects that noise and cross talk have on signal quality. On the negative side, differential signaling increases pin count by a factor of two for each data line. The next best thing to differential signaling is pseudo-differential signaling. Pseudo-differential signaling comprises comparing a data signal to a reference voltage using a differential receiver or comparator.
When high speed data is transmitted between chips, the signal lines are characterized by their transmission line parameters. High speed signals are subject to reflections if the transmission lines are not terminated in an impedance that matches the transmission line characteristic impedance. Reflections may propagate back and forth between driver and receiver and reduce the margins when detecting signals at the receiver. Some form of termination is therefore usually required for all high-speed signals to control overshoot, undershoot, and increase signal quality. Typically, a Thevenin's resistance (equivalent resistance of the Thevenin's network equals characteristic impedance of transmission line) is used to terminate data lines allowing the use of higher valued resistors. Additionally, the Thevenin's network is used to establish a bias voltage between the power supply rails. In this configuration, the data signals will then swing around this Thevenin's equivalent bias voltage. When this method is used to terminate data signal lines, a reference voltage is necessary to bias a differential receiver that operates as a pseudo-differential receiver to detect data signals in the presence of noise and cross talk.
Sometimes pseudo-differential signaling is not adequate for a desired signal quality and true differential signaling is needed at the expense of reduced bandwidth. The signal lines for pseudo-differential signaling are individually terminated to eliminate reflections. Typically a voltage divider provides a bias voltage as well as generating the proper impedance level by the parallel combination of the resistors in the voltage divider. In a true differential receiver, the termination resistance is usually placed across the two signal lines. Configuring a communication network so that either differential or pseudo-differential signaling could be used with a termination network that was switchable would lead to excessive capacitive loading unless a novel approach was used. Therefore, there is a need for a switch selectable termination system that enables both true differential and pseudo-differential signaling while minimizing capacitive loading.
A communication network is configured as signal pairs with the two signal lines terminated in a switch selectable termination network. The individual signal lines are each coupled to the positive input of a pseudo-differential comparator which has the negative input coupled to a reference voltage. Each of the signal lines are terminated in the common node of a resistor voltage divider that has its positive and negative nodes coupled to the positive and negative power supply voltages, respectively, with electronic switches. The positive nodes of the voltage divider terminators are cross-coupled with pass gates to the corresponding negative nodes. In this manner, two data signals may be transmitted and received using pseudo differential signaling. If true differential signaling is required, then the electronic switches are turned OFF and the pass gates are gated ON with a known resistance. This results in the voltage divider resistors being coupled in series with a pass gate and in parallel across the two signal lines. The parallel combination of the resistances is sized to correctly terminate the differential lines. The electronic switches are sized with the voltage divider resistors to provide the required pseudo terminating resistance and the pass gates are sized so that the series/parallel combination of the pass gates and the voltage divider resistors provides the required differential terminating resistance.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without such specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits may be shown in block diagram form in order not to obscure the present invention in unnecessary detail. For the most part, details concerning timing considerations and the like have been omitted inasmuch as such details are not necessary to obtain a complete understanding of the present invention and are within the skills of persons of ordinary skill in the relevant art.
Refer now to the drawings wherein depicted elements are not necessarily shown to scale and wherein like or similar elements are designated by the same reference numeral through the several views.
Inputs 710 and 715 are coupled to signal Data 0713 and inputs 718 and 716 are coupled to signal Data 1721. Only resistors 709, 711, 706 and 708 are directly coupled to these inputs and thus their parasitic capacitance is lower than the termination network in
In the pseudo-differential mode, control signal 720 is set to a logic one and control signal 726 is set to a logic zero. Control signal 726 turns ON the P channel field effect transistors (PFET) 712 and 705 coupling the positive supply voltage to resistors 706 and 711. Likewise control signal 720 turns ON NFETs 707 and 702 coupling the ground potential to resistors 708 and 709. Since control signal 726 is coupled to the NFETs in pass gates 703 and 704 and control signal 720 is coupled to the corresponding PFETs, pass gates 703 and 704 are gated OFF. The pseudo-differential mode insures that one voltage divider (resistors 711 and 709) configuration appears at inputs 710 and 715 and the other voltage divider (resistors 706 and 708) appears at inputs 716 and 718. Gating circuitry (not shown) is used to direct outputs 717 and 723 to down-stream logic.
Since the PFETs 712 and 705 appear in series with resistors 711 and 706 and the NFETs 702 and 707 appear in series with resistors 708 and 709, their resistance may be sized to ensure a desired value when gated ON by control signals 720 and 726 in the pseudo-differential mode. Likewise, pass gates 703 and 704 have devices sized to ensure a desired termination resistance value for the series/parallel combination of resistors 709, 711, 706, and 708 in the true differential mode. For an exemplary network providing a 50 ohm single ended termination and a 100 ohm differential termination, resistors 709, 711, 706, and 708 are set to 75 ohms, PFETs 712 and 705 and NFETs 702 and 707 are configured to have an ON resistance of 25 ohms, and pass gates 703 and 704 are configured to have an ON resistance of 50 ohms.
In the true differential mode, control signal 720 is set to a logic zero and control signal 726 is set to a logic one. Control signal 726 turns OFF PFETs 712 and 705 decoupling the positive supply voltage from resistors 706 and 711. Likewise control signal 720 turns OFF NFETs 707 and 702 decoupling the ground potential from resistors 708 and 709. Since control signal 726 is coupled to the NFETs in pass gates 703 and 704 and control signal 720 is coupled to the corresponding PFETs, pass gates 703 and 704 are gated ON. The pseudo-differential mode ensures that resistors 711 and 708 are coupled in series and in parallel with the series connection of resistors 706 and 709. The series/parallel resistor combination now appears across inputs 710 and 718 and 715 and 716. Since the power supply voltages are decoupled from the resistors, the true differential termination is purely passive. Gating circuitry (not shown) is used to direct which output 724 to down-stream logic. The circuit configuration of
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4935951 | Robinson et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4993058 | McMinn et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5012507 | Leighton et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5161180 | Chavous | Nov 1992 | A |
RE34677 | Wang et al. | Jul 1994 | E |
5511111 | Serbetcioglu et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526406 | Luneau | Jun 1996 | A |
5621379 | Collins | Apr 1997 | A |
5673304 | Connor et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5724412 | Srinivasan | Mar 1998 | A |
5796806 | Birckbichler | Aug 1998 | A |
5805587 | Norris et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5883942 | Lim et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5940474 | Ruus | Aug 1999 | A |
5940475 | Hansen | Aug 1999 | A |
6009148 | Reeves | Dec 1999 | A |
6011473 | Klein | Jan 2000 | A |
6104800 | Benson | Aug 2000 | A |
6144644 | Bajzath et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6208718 | Rosenthal | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208726 | Bansal et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219413 | Burg | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6259692 | Shtivelman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6307920 | Thomson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310946 | Bauer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343115 | Foladare et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347136 | Horan | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356756 | Koster | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6434126 | Park | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6476763 | Allen, Jr. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6492846 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504412 | Vangal et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529500 | Pandharipande | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6603977 | Walsh et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605958 | Bergman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608886 | Contractor | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622016 | Sladek et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624754 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6661785 | Shang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665388 | Bedingfield | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665611 | Oran et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674745 | Schuster et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678357 | Stumer et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6680998 | Bell et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683472 | Best et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6703930 | Skinner | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718021 | Crockett et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6771742 | McCalmont et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792081 | Contractor | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804338 | Chen | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6842448 | Norris et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6868074 | Hanson | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6912399 | Zirul et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6924659 | Andrews et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940950 | Dickinson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7208972 | Dreps et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20020072348 | Wheeler et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020160745 | Wang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030211839 | Baum et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216148 | Henderson | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040037403 | Koch | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040057425 | Brouwer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040101123 | Garcia | May 2004 | A1 |
20040140928 | Cleghorn | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050047574 | Reid | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063519 | James | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050151642 | Tupler et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175166 | Welenson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190750 | Kafka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050190892 | Dawson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232243 | Adamczyk et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050250468 | Lu | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070290712 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |