This application relates to transformers and, more particularly, to transformers working with switches to control signal flow.
Transformers and switches are widely used in modern radio frequency (RF) transceiver design to control signal flow. In a multi-port system, the combination of transformers and switches may establish signal flow between certain ports, while keeping other ports isolated. A widely seen example is the transformers plus the transmitter/receiver switch for antenna sharing in an RF transceiver. To enable multiple circuit blocks sharing the antenna, RF switches are put around transformers and antennas to control the antenna ownership by the circuit blocks. When the switch is in a first position, the antenna is connected to the transmitter, allowing the transmitter to send signals to a remote receiver. When the switch is in a second position, the antenna is connected to the receiver, allowing the receiver to receive signal sent by a remote transmitter.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this document will become more readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various views, unless otherwise specified.
In accordance with the embodiments described herein, a switchable transformer architecture is disclosed. The switchable transformer includes a primary winding, a secondary winding, and a tertiary winding, in which either the secondary winding or the tertiary winding or both may establish a signal path to the primary winding, based on the position of switches. The transformer architecture achieves high isolation between the secondary and the tertiary windings and low loss on the signal path.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which show by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the subject matter described herein may be practiced. However, it is to be understood that other embodiments will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading this disclosure. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be construed in a limiting sense, as the scope of the subject matter is defined by the claims.
In
The primary 20 (blue) is connected to port 130. The secondary (black) is connected to port 270. The tertiary (red) is connected to port 360. In some embodiments, only one of port 2 and port 3 may establish a signal path to port 1. The other port is isolated so that no signal flows to it. Thus, either the port 360 or the port 270 establishes a signal path to port 1, but not both. In
The novel transformer 100 further includes a pair of switches 80, 90, for controlling whether the port 360 or the port 270 establishes the signal path to port 130. In
Similarly, the switch 90 that enables an output to port 360 may be configured in one of two ways. In
In some embodiments, the port 2 switch 80 and the port 3 switch 90 enable the transformer 100 to achieve high isolation between the two ports (i.e., the port 360 and the port 270) and low loss on the signal path, established between port 130 and either the port 270 or the port 360. The high isolation is due to coupling cancellation while the low loss is due to reduced voltage swing across the switches 80, 90, so that a low-voltage device may be used. Further, the architecture 100 is area-efficient since a single transformer is servicing both the port 270 and the port 360. In some embodiments, a transmitter is connected to the port 270 while a receiver is connected to the port 3. Using the transformer architecture 100, the transmitter and receiver may be selectively enabled.
In some embodiments, the switchable transformer architecture 100 is designed to control the transformer so that it may perform either as a regular high-coupling transformer or as a low-coupling transformer. The idea is illustrated in
The transformer 200 is a regular transformer that includes a switch 210, with the arrangement of connections formed by the switch looking in the schematic illustration like a cross (A connected to B, and C connected to D). Although depicted as a single switch, the switch 210 may consist of multiple switches that achieve the A-B and C-D connections shown.
The transformer 300 is a low-coupling transformer that includes a switch 310, with the arrangement of connections formed by the switch looking in the schematic illustration like two parallel lines (A connected to C, and B connected to D). Again, although depicted as a single switch, the switch 310 consists of multiple switches that achieve the A-C and B-D connections shown.
As is well-known, transformers consist of a primary winding and a second winding. A current coming into the primary winding induces a magnetic field that, in turn, generates the current so that power is transferred from the primary winding to the secondary winding. In the two transformers 200, 300 of
Arrows are used to depict the resulting flow of current in the secondary. In both the regular transformer 200 and in the low-coupling transformer 300, the arrows are counter-clockwise in their direction, due to the out-of-surface direction of the magnetic fields 250, 350.
The transformer 200 achieves a high coupling coefficient between the primary (red) and the secondary (black). This is because the current flowing in the inner turn 240A of the secondary winding is in the same direction as the current flowing in the outer turn 240B of the secondary winding (additive current flow). The transformer 300, by contrast, is a low-coupling transformer because the current flowing in the inner turn 340A of the secondary winding is flowing in the opposite direction as the current flowing in the outer turn 340B of the secondary winding (subtractive or opposite current flow), thus having the effect of cancelling out much of the current in the secondary. Thus, in the low-coupling transformer 300, the two currents will mostly cancel each other out, which results in a low coupling coefficient between the primary and the secondary. It is the distinct differences between the operations of these two transformers 200 and 300 that motivates the design of the switchable transformer 100.
Returning to
When the port 2 switch 80 is in the configuration of
The transformer 100 thus enables two possible signal links between port 1 and either port 2 or port 3. The port 2 switch 80 and port 3 switch 90 are each connected to the inside nodes of the transformer to control the transformer current flow. The switches may control the coupling coefficient between/among transformer ports. Further, the transformer 100 is in a compact three-port form. Combined with the capability of the switch to force one port into high isolation mode, the transformer achieves a directional coupling from the primary port to one of the secondary ports.
In some embodiments, when the port 2 switch 80 is turned on, the port 3 switch 90 is turned off, and vice-versa. When the port 2 switch 80 is turned on, power from port 1 flows to port 2 and, since the port 3 switch 90 is turned off, no power flows to port 3. This low-coupling of the tertiary does not mean that power is lost to heat, simply that there is no coupling of power from the primary to the tertiary.
Three-port transformers have been in the literature to perform antenna sharing and transmit/receive switch design. But none of the known three-port transformers perform control inside the transformer, nor do they employ the above-described coupling cancellation to achieve port isolation.
In some embodiments, the voltage swing across the port 2 and port 3 switches 80, 90 of the transformer 100 is only half of that at the corresponding port. As a result, in some embodiments, low-voltage switches and fewer switches may be used to meet the reliability requirement, relative to those that would be required for typical transformers. Using fewer and low-voltage switches leads to less switch loss, in some embodiments. As integrated circuit technology advances, the breakdown voltage of the transistor becomes lower, making the architecture 100 more attractive.
The switchable transformer architecture 100 of
Transformers having switches is nothing new, but the transformer 100 is unique because the switches are embedded between turns of the secondary and tertiary windings, not outside the transformer. Any transformer winding may be treated as four connected segments. In some embodiments, switches are placed at four positions: the end of the first segment, the start of the second segment, the end of the third segment, and the start of the fourth segment. In a normal high-coupling transformer configuration, the switches connect the end of the first segment to the start of the second segment, and connect the end of the third segment to the start of the fourth segment. The coupled current in each segment flows in the same direction along the winding so that power is transferred to this winding.
In a low-coupling configuration, the switches connect the end of the first segment to the end of the third segment, and connect the start of the second segment to the start of the fourth segment. The coupled currents in the first segment and the fourth segment flow in the opposite direction of those in the second and the third segments, so that overall coupled current is about zero. The configuration results in minimum power being transferred to the winding. Although it is preferable to make the four segments the same length to achieve better isolation when the transformer is in the low coupling configuration, the length may be of different lengths for other benefits, such as achieving a low voltage swing across the switches.
Again, this arrangement is depicted in
As an example, the proposed architecture is implemented in a TSMC 65 nm CMOS process (CMOS being short for complementary metal-oxide semiconductor). The layout is shown in
The real transistor switches are used to investigate the performance. All three ports are assumed to have a 50-ohm load. Since the voltage swing across all switches is half of the voltage swing at the ports, only low-voltage transistors are needed, in some embodiments. At certain nodes, two serial transistors are used to improve linearity. The results at 2.5 GHz are summarized in Table 2, below.
In current solutions, transformers and switches are separated. Usually multiple transformers and switches are needed to share the port 1. In a system with large output power, such as WiFi, multiple switches are implemented to meet the reliability requirement, which leads to large signal loss.
The above switchable transformer architecture combines the transformer and switch design. The switch controls the signal flow inside the transformer so that high isolation is achieved through coupling cancellation. And because the switch is inside the transformer, the switch does not see the full voltage swing at the transformer input. The result is relaxed reliability requirement on switches, which leads to less switch loss since fewer switches are needed and thus a low-voltage transformer may be used.
The switchable transformer 100 may be used in general integrated circuit processing as well as in a wide range of products implementing transformers and radio frequency switching circuits.
While the application has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6707367 | Castaneda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7010279 | Rofougaran | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7248844 | Rofougaran | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259649 | Ancey et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7526256 | Bhatti et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7683851 | Rofougaran et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7880547 | Lee et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890066 | Rofougaran | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7924135 | Chen et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7940152 | Kim et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8279018 | Song et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
20080253149 | Matumoto | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100109798 | Chu | May 2010 | A1 |
20100201457 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110043316 | Yang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013048908 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and written opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/056682, mailed on Mar. 4, 2013, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130082810 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |