Electric machines have been applied as motors and generators in a wide range of industries for more than a century. A reluctance machine is an electric machine in which torque is produced by the tendency of the movable part of the machine to move into a position where the inductance of an excited winding is maximized. An SRM is a type of a reluctance machine where the windings are energized as a function of the position of the movable part of the machine.
Conventional SRMs typically include one stator and one rotor, where the stator includes windings on the stator teeth to generate electromagnetic field and the rotor in the electromagnetic field has the tendency to align with the stator to achieve maximum inductance. The rotor rotates as long as the stator excitation switches successfully. However, conventional configurations of SRMs have conventional concentrated windings that may result in long flux paths, high torque ripple and increased core losses.
In one aspect of the disclosure, in at least one embodiment described herein, there is provided a switched reluctance machine comprising: an axially extending shaft; an axially extending rotor mounted to the shaft, the rotor having a plurality of salient rotor poles; an axially extending stator disposed coaxially and concentrically with the rotor, the stator having a plurality of salient stator poles protruding radially from the stator towards the rotor poles; and a plurality of electrical coils wound about the stator poles, the plurality of electrical coils including a plurality of separate phase coils defining a plurality of phases of the switched reluctance machine, wherein a number of rotor poles is related to a number of stator poles, a number of stator teeth, and a number of phases, according to
and at least one constraint condition, wherein Nph is the number of phases, Ns is the number of stator poles, Nr is the number of rotor poles, and LCM is the lowest common multiple of number of stator poles and number of rotor poles, and wherein the at least one constraint comprises the number of rotor poles being greater than the number of stator poles.
In some embodiments, the at least one constraint condition comprises an even number of rotor poles, and an even number of stator poles.
In some embodiments, the at least one constraint condition comprises winding adjacent stator poles with electrical coils having opposite polarities.
In at least one embodiment, the switched reluctance machine, when in operation, generates at least one short flux-path.
In some embodiments, the stator is generally symmetric, and the plurality of stator poles are equidistant from each other.
In some embodiments, the rotor is generally symmetric, and the plurality of rotor poles are equidistant from each other.
In another aspect, in at least one embodiment described herein, there is provided a method of manufacturing a switched reluctance machine having an axially extending shaft, an axially extending rotor mounted to the shaft, an axially extending stator disposed coaxially and concentrically with the rotor, the rotor having a plurality of salient rotor poles, the stator having a plurality of salient stator poles protruding radially from the stator towards the rotor poles. The switched reluctance machine further comprises a plurality of electrical coils wound about the plurality of stator poles to define a plurality of phases of the switched reluctance machine, where the method comprises determining a number of rotor poles according to
and at least one constraint condition, wherein Nph is the number of phases, Ns is the number of stator poles, Nr is the number of rotor poles, and LCM is the lowest common multiple of number of stator poles and number of rotor poles and wherein the at least one constraint condition comprises the number of rotor poles being greater than the number of stator poles.
In some embodiments, the at least one constraint condition comprises an even number of rotor poles, and an even number of stator poles.
In some other embodiments, the at least one constraint condition comprises winding adjacent stator poles with electrical coils having opposite polarities.
In at least one embodiment, the switched reluctance machine, when in operation, generates at least one short flux-path.
In some embodiments, the stator is generally symmetric, and the plurality of stator poles are equidistant from each other.
In some other embodiments, the rotor is generally symmetric, and the plurality of rotor poles are equidistant from each other.
Other features and advantages of the present application will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while indicating embodiments of the application, are given by way of illustration only and the scope of the claims should not be limited by these embodiments, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
The skilled person in the art will understand that the drawings, described below, are for illustration purposes only. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the applicants' teachings in anyway. Also, it will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.
Unless otherwise indicated, the definitions and embodiments described in this and other sections are intended to be applicable to all embodiments and aspects of the present application herein described for which they are suitable as would be understood by a person skilled in the art.
In understanding the scope of the present application, the term “comprising” and its derivatives, as used herein, are intended to be open ended terms that specify the presence of the stated features, elements, components, groups, integers, and/or steps, but do not exclude the presence of other unstated features, elements, components, groups, integers and/or steps. The foregoing also applies to words having similar meanings such as the terms, “including”, “having” and their derivatives. The term “consisting” and its derivatives, as used herein, are intended to be closed terms that specify the presence of the stated features, elements, components, groups, integers, and/or steps, but exclude the presence of other unstated features, elements, components, groups, integers and/or steps. The term “consisting essentially of”, as used herein, is intended to specify the presence of the stated features, elements, components, groups, integers, and/or steps as well as those that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s) of features, elements, components, groups, integers, and/or steps.
Terms of degree such as “substantially”, “about” and “approximately” as used herein mean a reasonable amount of deviation of the modified term such that the end result is not significantly changed. These terms of degree should be construed as including a deviation of at least ±5% of the modified term if this deviation would not negate the meaning of the word it modifies.
In addition, as used herein, the wording “and/or” is intended to represent an inclusive-or. That is, “X and/or Y” is intended to mean X or Y or both, for example. As a further example, “X, Y, and/or Z” is intended to mean X or Y or Z or any combination thereof.
As used in this application, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural references unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
In embodiments comprising an “additional” or “second” component, the second component as used herein is physically different from the other components or first component. A “third” component is different from the other, first, and second components, and further enumerated or “additional” components are similarly different.
The term “and/or” as used herein means that the listed items are present, or used, individually or in combination. In effect, this term means that “at least one of” or “one or more” of the listed items is used or present.
In the various embodiments disclosed herein, switch reluctance machines (SRMs) with a multi-phase wound stator and a rotor are disclosed. The SRMs disclosed herein are configured to generate short-flux paths, and have a rotor pole and a stator pole numerical relationship of
where Ns is the number of stator poles and Nr is the number of rotor poles with Ns<Nr, and the number of rotor and stator poles are an even number.
In addition, in the various embodiments disclosed herein, the flux paths in the SRMs are reduced by using winding schemes where pairs of adjacent poles of the stator have opposite polarities. In such embodiments, the magnetic flux circulates in two independent loops to make a short flux path leading to lower core losses and improved torque capabilities.
The SRM 100 includes salient poles on the stator 105 and the rotor 110. In SRM 100, the stator 105 has twelve (12) stator poles 115 and a rotor 110 with eight (8) rotor poles 125. The SRM 100 also has concentrated coil windings 120 wound around the stator 105. The salient pole configuration on both the rotor 110 and the stator 105 provides a relatively simple manufacturing process and robust operation for SRM.
The coils 120 are wound around each stator pole 115 and connected together to create the phase windings for each phase. In an SRM, such as SRM 100, the coils 120 on diametrically opposite stator pole pairs are connected in series or in parallel to form a phase of the machine. SRMs may be designed with varying numbers of stator and rotor poles, and varying number of phases. In general, SRMs typically do not include excitation sources on the rotor 110. Also illustrated in SRM 100 is a rotor slot angle 130 formed between adjacent rotor poles 125.
In an SRM, such as SRM 100, reluctance torque is the sole torque producing mechanism. When phase windings on the stator poles 115 of SRM 100 are excited with current, the excited pole draws the nearest rotor pole 125 into alignment with it to minimize the reluctance in the phase. In order to create motoring torque, the phases are excited on the rising slope of their inductance profiles. In SRM 100, a plurality of magnetic flux lines 140 representing the magnetic flux between the rotor 110 and the stator 105 are also shown.
The phase windings in SRMs, such as SRM 100, are electrically isolated from each other. As a result, conventional inverters cannot be used to supply power to the phase coils 120. In SRM 100, the windings 120 in different phases may be energized as a function of the position of rotor 110. Typically, the current in each phase may be controlled by an asymmetric bridge converter, such as converter 200.
Reference is next made to
Reference is next made to
In the embodiment of
The unevenly distributed rotor poles 425 are further illustrated by way of rotor poles angles between various rotor poles 425. As shown, a first rotor pole angle 460a is formed between a first rotor pole 425a and a second rotor pole 425b. A second rotor pole angle 460b is formed between the second rotor pole 425b and a third rotor pole 425c. The first rotor pole angle 460a is different (in the illustrated embodiment, smaller) than the second rotor pole angle 460b indicating the uneven distribution of the rotor poles 425.
In the embodiments of
Reference is next made to
SRM 500 has a stator 505 with twelve (12) stator poles 515 but only six (6) stator poles 515′ have coil windings 520 wound around them. Also, as shown, the width of the stator poles 515′ without coils is not the same as the width of the stator poles 515 with coils. These features may pose challenges in the proper use, manufacturing, and control of the motor.
The SRM configuration in
Reference is next made to
In the embodiment of
Reference is next made to
In the various embodiment of
As shown, the SRM has twelve (12) stator poles 815 and fourteen (14) rotor poles 825. In this configuration of SRM 800A, coils 820 are wound around the stator poles 815 to provide a three-phase SRM. Each phase in the three-phase SRM 800A has adjacent stator coils wound in opposite directions, such that two adjacent stator poles have opposite-polarity coils. SRM 800A has a symmetric construction with a higher number of rotor poles 825 than stator poles 815.
Also shown in
As shown in
In the various embodiments disclosed herein, the number of machine periodicity may be determined from the flux paths, based on equation (1) provided below. In equation (1), Ns is number of stator poles 815, Nr is number of rotor poles 825 and LCM (Ns, Nr) is the lowest common multiple of Ns and Nr:
In the various embodiments illustrated herein, the number of machine periodicity may be determined based on a relationship between mechanical angle (θm) 840 and electrical angle (θe).
θe=MP×θm (2)
Equation (2) may be rearranged to provide equations (3) and (4):
Based on equations (1) and (4), a relationship between a number of stator poles (Ns) 910, number of rotor poles (Nr) 925, and a number of phases (Nph) may be determined using equation (5), provided that Nr>Ns:
In the various embodiments illustrated herein, based on equation (5) and at least one constraint condition, a number of stator poles 910 and rotor poles 925 for various topologies of SRM, such as interior rotor, exterior rotor and axial flux SRM etc., may be determined. As well, SRMs based on equation (5) product short-flux paths configurations for SRMs.
In the various embodiments disclosed herein, one constraint condition requires that the number of rotor poles and the number of stator poles of the SRMs are even numbers. In addition, another constraint condition requires that the number of rotor poles is greater than the number of stator poles.
Reference is next made to
As shown, the SRM has twenty-four (24) stator poles 915 and twenty-eight (28) rotor poles 925. In this configuration of SRM 900A, coils 920 are wound around the stator poles 915 to provide a three-phase SRM. Each phase in the three-phase SRM 900A has adjacent stator coils wound in opposite directions, such that two adjacent stator poles have opposite-polarity coils. SRM 900A has a symmetric construction with a higher number of rotor poles 925 than stator poles 915.
As shown in
Reference is next made to
As shown, the SRM has sixteen (16) stator poles 1015 and eighteen (18) rotor poles 1025. In this configuration of SRM 1000A, coils 1020 are wound around the stator poles 1015 to provide a four-phase SRM. SRM 1000A has a symmetric construction with a higher number of rotor poles 1025 than stator poles 1015.
As shown in
Reference is next made to
As shown, the SRM has twenty (20) stator poles 1115 and twenty-two (22) rotor poles 1125. In this configuration of SRM 1100A, coils 1120 are wound around the stator poles 1115 to provide a five-phase SRM. SRM 1100A has a symmetric construction with a higher number of rotor poles 1125 than stator poles 1115.
As shown in
Various SRM configurations determined based on equation (5) are provided below. Table 1 provides SRM configurations for three-phase, multi-teeth SRMs:
Table 2 provides SRM configurations for four-phase, multi-teeth SRMs:
Table 3 provides SRM configurations for five-phase, multi-teeth SRMs:
While the present application has been described with reference to examples, it is to be understood that the scope of the claims should not be limited by the embodiments set forth in the examples, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
All publications, patents and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference in its entirety. Where a term in the present application is found to be defined differently in a document incorporated herein by reference, the definition provided herein is to serve as the definition for the term.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/585,217, filed Nov. 13, 2017, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4883999 | Hendershot | Nov 1989 | A |
5111095 | Hendershot | May 1992 | A |
Entry |
---|
J. D. Widmer et al., “Optimization of an 80-kW Segmental Rotor Switched Reluctance Machine for Automotive Traction”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 51, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 2015, pp. 2990-2999. |
B.C. Mecrow et al., “Switched Reluctance Motors with Segmental Rotors”, IEE Proceedings—Electric Power Applications, vol. 149, No. 4, Jul. 2002, pp. 245-254. |
M. T. Khor et al. “A 3-phase 12/10 asymmetrical switched reluctance motor,” 2005 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Dresden, 2005, pp. 9 pp.-p. 9. |
Junfang Bao et al., “Comprehensive analysis of novel three-phase 12/10 switched reluctance motor”, Abstract, International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), Busan, 2013, pp. 592-596. |
Y. Hu et al. “Investigation on a Multimode Switched Reluctance Motor: Design, Optimization, Electromagnetic Analysis, and Experiment”, Abstract, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, No. 12, Dec. 2017, pp. 9886-9895. |
Jacek F. Giearas, “Electrical Machines, Fundamentals of Electromechanical Energy Conversion”, CRC Press, Aug. 2016, pp. 85-87, 106. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190148998 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62585217 | Nov 2017 | US |