The invention relates to a switching device having two interrupter units connected in series. The device has at least one drive unit for moving at least one contact and two control capacitors which are connected in parallel with the interrupter units in each case.
Serial connections or series connections of interrupter units have multiple uses in the field of energy supply. By way of example, one application consists in a switching device comprising a plurality of interrupter units in the form of vacuum switching tubes, which are connected in series (synonymous with a serial connection), and the electric strength being increased as a result of the series connection in the case of high-voltage applications. Ultimately, however, the series connection of interrupter units essentially serves to increase the electric strength of the circuit with respect to individual tubes. In this case, a technical requirement is to ensure that the voltage distribution to the individual interrupter units connected in series is controlled such that none of the interrupter units is loaded beyond its electric strength.
To ensure the voltage distribution between the individual interrupter units, control capacitors are in turn connected in parallel with each interrupter unit. Depending on the so-called post-arc current, which flows in the interrupter unit after the current interruption has taken place, the voltage distribution between the two or more interrupter units when using control capacitors deviates from the calculated or statistical case. The post-arc current mentioned can be caused for example by metal vapor in the vacuum tube or residual charge carriers in the switching path. The voltage distribution between the interrupter units during the switching procedure is therefore not steady, but dynamic.
However, this dynamic of the voltage distribution during the switching procedure results in the said control capacitors being unable to prevent one of the interrupter units having to cope with a higher voltage than its rated voltage, i.e. than its so-called electric strength allows, if only for a brief period of time. Therefore, in the case of the series connection of interrupter units, in particular in the case of vacuum tubes, these need to be configured so as to ensure significant reserves with regard to the electric strength of the individual interrupter units. If a particular rated voltage is stipulated, it may be that either two interrupter units with a higher rated voltage than is nominally required have to be connected in series or more than two interrupter units with a lower rated voltage have to be connected in series. In both cases, the cost of achieving the stipulated total rated voltage of the series connection owing to the dynamic voltage distribution during the switching procedure is higher than if the rated voltages of the individual components were purely combined. This calls for greater investment in interrupter units for a specified rated voltage.
The object of the invention consists in providing a switching device having two or more interrupter units connected in series, which has a higher electric strength compared to the prior art whilst using the same components.
The object is achieved in a switching device having two interrupter units connected in series, as claimed.
The switching device as claimed in has at least two interrupter units connected in series, having at least one drive unit for moving at least one contact and having two control capacitors, which are connected in parallel with the interrupter units in each case. The switching device is notable in that at least one control capacitor has mechanically movable components for changing the capacitance and at least one of these components has a mechanical coupling to the drive unit.
As a result of coupling a movable component of the control capacitor to the drive unit, which also serves to drive at least one interrupter unit, during the actual switching procedure in which the voltage distribution between the at least two interrupter units connected in series varies dynamically, the control capacitor can have an influence which ensures that, during the switching procedure, approximately the same voltage is present at both interrupter units at any time of the switching procedure. It is thus possible to make full use of the rated voltage, i.e. the voltage with which the selected interrupter unit is to be operated with maximum reliability, during the series connection. Safety reserves in the electric strength which are held available for a possible dynamic voltage distribution during the switching procedure can be significantly reduced. This is advantageous in that either fewer interrupter units have to be connected in series or interrupter units with a lower rated voltage have to be connected in series to achieve a stipulated maximum switching voltage. Both cases result in a lower investment in the interrupter units needed to ensure a corresponding stipulated rated voltage.
This arrangement is particularly expedient when using vacuum switching tubes as interrupter units. In this case, two or more vacuum switching tubes, as mentioned, can be connected serially or in series. However, a vacuum switching tube can essentially also be connected in series with a gas path.
The control capacitor, which ensures the dynamic control of the capacitance, has at least one movable component, which is mechanically coupled to the drive unit. This can essentially be the dielectric, which is displaced with respect to one or two electrodes; however, an electrical contact can also be displaced along an electrode or dielectric. Electrodes can essentially also be displaced with respect to a fixed dielectric. The possible described movements of the corresponding components of the control capacitor result in a dynamic change in the capacitance present at the capacitor.
In this case, the term mechanical coupling is understood such that the control capacitor is in mechanical communication with the drive unit, which means that a mechanical connection is present to transmit a force, an impulse or an action between two systems. By way of example, this will be realized via movable connections such as bearings or joints, but also via fixed connections such as bonded of force-fitting connections or combinations of movable and fixed connections.
This mechanical connection is also understood to include a transmission element, for example a gear. This transmission element is suitable for contributing to the control of the movement kinematics of the corresponding component of the control capacitor. The drive unit of the switching device or an individual interrupter unit is configured such that the opening or closing procedure of a contact or a contact system is optimized precisely for this purpose. If the said drive unit, which drives one or more interrupter units of the switching device, is simultaneously used to move corresponding components of the control capacitor such that a dynamically changed capacitance of the control capacitor is present, which in turn results in a compensation of the voltage peaks in the interrupter unit, it may be necessary for these kinematics to follow a different principle from that which applies to the optimized drive unit of the switching contacts. The necessary progression of the capacitance of the control capacitor for influencing the voltage differences between the interrupter units can be determined experimentally. Based on this experimental data, it is possible to determine a necessary change in the control capacitance and therefore a corresponding change over time or a speed of change or kinematics of change of the control capacitance.
From this information, it is possible to calculate the gear kinematics of the transmission element, which serves to move the components of the control capacitor with respect to one another during the switching procedure such that the correct capacitance is present in each case.
In this case, in the representation of the variable control capacitor, a plurality of arrangements with regard to the capacitor and the interrupter unit are possible. An advantageous configuration consists in the interrupter unit being provided with an insulator housing, wherein the housing is not grounded. This refers to a so-called live-tank design. In this case, the control capacitor is arranged outside the non-grounded insulating housing and connected in parallel with the contacting means of the interrupter unit.
In a further configuration, for example in a gas-insulated circuit or a so-called dead-tank design for interrupter units, the housing of these interrupter units is grounded. In this case, it may be expedient to configure the control capacitor as part of the entire interrupter unit in such a way that a cylindrical dielectric is mounted to be movable along a switching axis between a housing of the interrupter unit and a vacuum switching tube located therein.
Further configurations of the invention and further features are explained in more detail with reference to the following figures. These are purely schematic configurations, which do not represent a restriction of the scope of protection.
In
Only part of the switching device 2 is illustrated in
The control capacitor 10 has a cylindrical configuration in
According to the prior art, the control capacitors according to
If this voltage can be determined and also influenced, as depicted by the device according to
An alternative configuration of the parallel circuit of
The control capacitor 10 in the illustration according to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2019 212 106.3 | Aug 2019 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/063754 | 5/18/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/028085 | 2/18/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1792340 | Wellman | Feb 1931 | A |
3411038 | Lee | Nov 1968 | A |
3447047 | Lindsay | May 1969 | A |
3541284 | Wachta | Nov 1970 | A |
3839612 | Badey | Oct 1974 | A |
4087664 | Weston | May 1978 | A |
4434332 | Yanabu | Feb 1984 | A |
4492835 | Turner | Jan 1985 | A |
5124872 | Pham et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5170023 | Pham et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
6498315 | Betz | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6920033 | Jahreiss et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
8847095 | Donzel | Sep 2014 | B2 |
10170255 | Glaser | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10312038 | Suwa | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20090014418 | Jahn | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20140146422 | Nomura | May 2014 | A1 |
20140166622 | Abe et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140299579 | Hartmann et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150206676 | Sato | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200947544 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101393818 | Mar 2009 | CN |
104810200 | Jul 2015 | CN |
2526942 | Dec 1976 | DE |
2552086 | May 1977 | DE |
102011083514 | Mar 2013 | DE |
S61126719 | Jun 1986 | JP |
H0382023 | Aug 1991 | JP |
H04230922 | Aug 1992 | JP |
WO 03028789 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2013035547 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2018230224 | Dec 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Translation of JPS61126719 (Original document published Jun. 14, 1986) (Year: 1986). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220293369 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |