The present disclosure relates to the switching control of a switched mode power supply (SMPS) for ensuring an efficient operation thereof, in particular SMPS including control modes using either a pulse width modulation or a pulse frequency modulation for generating switching signals.
In recent years, stringent requirements concerning the efficiency of power supplies have brought attention to the use of Switching Mode Power Supplies (SMPS, also referred to as “switching converters”). However, the actual efficiency of an SMPS depends on the controller that determines the switching instants of the semiconductor switch(es) included in the SMPS. Probably the most common approach for controlling the switching of an SMPS is Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) which can implemented quite easily. However, using PWM for controlling an SMPS and thus for regulating its output voltage or output current does not guarantee a high efficiency over a wide range of output currents.
A PWM based controller unit operates at a fixed frequency (PWM frequency), while modulating the duty-cycle of a rectangular PWM signal in order to regulate the power-supply output voltage (or current). The efficiency of power converters rapidly decreases at low output currents as driving losses remain constant (i.e., those losses related to the switching on and switching off of the semiconductor switches used in the output stage of the switching converter). In order to decrease the contribution of driving losses to the total amount of losses (all remaining losses essentially depend on the output current and thus decrease as the output current decreases) a Pulse Frequency Modulation (PFM) may be used for controlling the semiconductor switch(es) included in the output stage of the switching converter.
A controller unit using PFM reduces the duty cycle by reducing the switching frequency while keeping the on-time constant instead of reducing the on-time at a constant frequency as it is done when using PWM control. However, the efficiency of PFM control is increasingly bad at high output currents as the switching frequency (and thus switching and driving losses) increase as the output current increases.
A consolidated view of the above leads to the conclusion that PWM control is more efficient (than PFM control) at high output currents and PFM control is more efficient at low output currents. Controller units for the use in SMPS have been proposed that include both a PFM controller unit and a PWM controller unit so as to benefit by the advantages of both types of control of the SMPS. However, the complexity of the implementation of such PWM/PFM controlled switching converters is undesirably high and require additional hardware for determining the conditions defining the switchover from PWM mode to PFM mode (and vice versa). Further, some implementations may lead to an undesirable toggling between the two control modes.
There remains a need for switching converters using a control that allows for an improved efficiency throughout a wide range of output currents.
One embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for controlling a switching converter that is configured to convert an input voltage into an output voltage supplied to a load in accordance with a switching signal. The switching converter is configured to operate in a pulse width modulation mode or, alternatively, in a pulse frequency modulation mode. The method comprises, when operating in the pulse width modulation mode: generating, as the switching signal, a pulse width modulated (PWM) signal of a pre-defined constant switching frequency. The PWM signal has a duty cycle that is regulated such that the output voltage of the switching converter matches, at least approximately, a desired output voltage under the condition that the duty cycle is regulated such that it does not fall below a predefined minimum duty cycle. The output voltage is monitored and switched over to the pulse frequency modulation mode when the output voltage exceeds a predefined first threshold. The method further comprises, when operating in the pulse frequency modulation mode, monitoring the output voltage and generating, as the switching signal, a series of pulses of a predefined constant pulse length. A pulse is generated each time the output voltage falls to a predefined second threshold. The frequency of the switching signal is monitored and switched to the pulse width modulation mode when the frequency of the switching signal exceeds a predefined frequency threshold.
One embodiment of the present invention relates to a controller circuit for controlling a switching converter which is configured to convert an input voltage into an output voltage supplied to a load in accordance with a switching signal. The controller circuit and thus the switching converter are configured to operate in a pulse width modulation mode or, alternatively, in a pulse frequency modulation mode. When operating in the pulse width modulation mode, the controller circuit is configured to generate, as the switching signal, a pulse width modulated (PWM) signal of a pre-defined constant switching frequency. The PWM signal has a duty cycle that is regulated such that the output voltage of the switching converter matches, at least approximately, a desired output voltage under the condition that the duty cycle is regulated such that it does not fall below a predefined minimum duty cycle. In the pulse width modulation mode, the controller circuit is further configured to monitor the output voltage and to switch over to the pulse frequency modulation mode when the output voltage exceeds a predefined first threshold. When operating in the pulse frequency modulation mode, the controller circuit is configured to monitor the output voltage and to generate, as the switching signal, a series of pulses of a predefined constant pulse length. A pulse is generated each time the output voltage falls to a predefined second threshold. In the pulse frequency modulation mode, the controller circuit is further configured to monitor the frequency of the switching signal and to switch to the pulse width modulation mode when the frequency of the switching signal exceeds a predefined frequency threshold.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, instead emphasis being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts. In the drawings:
a and 1b, collectively
The making and using of the presently preferred embodiments are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
For most types of switching converters the output voltage VOUT of the converter 20 depends on the ratio between the average on time and the average off time of the switching element, e.g., of the MOS transistor TSW. In the context of a pulse width modulated switching signal this ratio is typically represented by the duty cycle which can be seen as an average relative on time (typically given as percentage). However, a duty cycle value can be assigned to any periodic rectangular switching signal regardless of the type of modulation.
In order to provide a regulated output voltage VOUT a controller circuit 10 (see
As already mentioned a PWM controlled power conversion is more efficient (than a PFM controlled) at high output currents and PFM controlled power conversion is more efficient at low output currents. This fact is illustrated in the diagram of
For the reason outlined above, controller units for the use in SMPS have been proposed that include both, a PFM controller unit and a PWM controller unit so as to benefit from the advantages of both types of control of the switching converter. However, the complexity of the implementation of such PWM/PFM controlled switching converters is undesirably high and requires additional hardware for determining the conditions defining the switchover from PWM mode to PFM mode (and vice versa). Further, some implementations may tend to an undesirable toggling between the two control modes.
It should be noticed that from simple calculations which consider the converter topology (buck converter, boost converter, etc.) such current thresholds can be analytically evaluated using the known values of the converter filter components (inductor LSW, capacitor COUT, etc.) and operating voltages (VIN, VOUT). In the case of a buck converter, for example, the following formulas can be found demonstrating the ability of the proposed approach to guarantee by design a fixed and defined hysteresis with respect to the current thresholds, whereby the current threshold iPFM2PWM is directly proportional to the frequency fPFM2PWM chosen as threshold.
Assuming that the switching signals exhibit the same on time TONmin for PWM operation and PFM operation the following formulas can be derived:
demonstrating that the hysteresis with respect to the current thresholds can be managed by the ratio fPFM2PWM over fPWM.
In the case of different on times during the two control modes (TONmin-PWM during PWM control and TONmin-PFM during PFM control) the current thresholds can be calculated as:
Consequently, the inequality
can be maintained with even less of a strict constraint on the PFM-to-PWM frequency threshold fPFM2PWM. The frequency threshold fPFM2PWM can be also lower than the PWM frequency fPWM if a larger on time TONmin-PFM is chosen in PFM control mode as compared to PWM control mode. This results in a small improvement of efficiency during PFM control mode, as it is possible to reduce the switching frequency (without compromising the hysteresis) and therefore the driving and switching losses.
Summarizing the above conditions for the transition from PWM control mode PFM control mode and vice versa is:
The second condition “condition 2” is equivalent to
Detecting whether the output current iOUT has fallen below the current threshold iPWM2PFM would entail an undesirably complex detection circuit. In order to simplify matters it has been found that the evaluation of “condition 1” can be substituted by the evaluation of an equivalent “condition 1a” which simply requires comparing the output voltage VOUT with a voltage reference VPWM2PFM. For this purpose, in PWM control mode, the controller circuit is configured to prevent the duty cycle of the switching signal PWM from falling below a minimum duty cycle DMIN corresponding to a minimum on time tONmin and also corresponding to the current threshold iPWM2PFM. Assuming PWM control mode and a falling output current iOUT, the duty cycle of the switching signal has to decrease in accordance with the output current iOUT so as to keep the output voltage VOUT at the desired constant level. When the output current iOUT reaches the current threshold iPWM2PFM the duty cycle simultaneously reaches the minimum duty cycle DMIN. When the output current iOUT falls below the current threshold iPWM2PFM the duty cycle can not be further reduced and thus the output voltage VOUT will start to increase which can be detected easily. Consequently “condition 1” can be substituted by the equivalent “condition 1a”, namely
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, “condition 1a” and “condition 2a” are evaluated for deciding whether to switch over to PFM control mode or PWM control mode. The resulting behavior of the controller circuit 10 is illustrated in
It is assumed that the controller circuit 10 is initially in a PWM control mode. Before time t1 the output current iOUT is equal to i1 and large enough to ensure continuous conduction mode (CCM) of the switching converter. Thus the controller circuit generates, as a switching signal, a PWM signal with a duty cycle D1 appropriate to regulate the output voltage to stay at its desired level VREF
The example of
Having described the function(s) of embodiments of the present invention an exemplary controller circuit 10 configured to perform this function(s) is illustrated in
Instead of comparing the output voltage VOUT with different voltage thresholds VPWM2PFM, VREF—PWM, and VREF—PFM as discussed above, in the present embodiment only one reference voltage VREF is compared to different fractionals of the output voltage VOUT which leads to equivalent results. The fractionals of the output voltage VOUT may be tapped from a voltage divider including the resistors R1, R2, R3, and R4 connected between a reference potential (e.g., ground) and the output of the switching converter 20. In the present example the following equations apply:
V
SWITCH
=V
OUT
R
4
/R
SUM,
V
PFM
=V
OUT(R3+R4)/RSUM,
V
PWM
=V
OUT(R2+R3+R4)/RSUM,
wherein RSUM=R1+R2+R3+R4. Thus the above mentioned “condition 1a” (VOUT>VPWM2PFM) may be replaced by VOUTR4/RSUM>VREF which is equivalent to VOUT>VREF·RSUM/R4. Therefrom it follows that the above-mentioned threshold VPWM2PFM equals VREF·RSUM/R4 in the present example. Analogously, the threshold VPWM—REF equals VREF·RSUM/(R2+R3+R4) and the threshold VPFM
The controller unit 10 illustrated in
As already explained above with respect to
During PFM control mode the comparator 122 is triggered each time the fractional voltage VPFM reaches the reference voltage VREF which is equivalent with the output voltage VOUT reaching the threshold VPFM
Where applicable the mode selection logic 16 has to “wake up” the PWM loop controller 13 when it has been sent so stand by mode before. To accelerate mode switch a second frequency threshold fWAKEUP may be provided to the frequency comparator which is slightly lower than the threshold fPFM2PWM. In this case, the mode selection logic 16 may be configured to wake up the PWM loop controller 13 when the PFM frequency fPFM exceeds the threshold fWAKEUP and to subsequently initiate the mode switch when the PFM frequency fPFM actually reaches the threshold fPFM2PWM (and the PWM loop controller 13 is back from stand by mode).
As the frequency comparator 15 (as well as other switching components) has limited reaction time the PFM frequency fPWM can rise to frequency values significantly higher than the threshold fPFM2PWM. Such limited reaction may be necessary to avoid spurious transitions from PFM to PWM control mode. In particular when the load increases very quickly (resulting in an upward step of the output current iOUT) the PFM frequency fPFM may rise to undesired high values in order to maintain the output voltage VOUT at the desired level. Dependent on the actual implementation of the switching components it may be necessary to limit (to “clamp”) the PFM switching frequency fPFM to a maximum frequency fPFMmax. In order to achieve such a frequency clamping feature, the fixed on time pulse generator 121 included in the PFM loop controller 12 (see
The fixed on time pulse generator 121 of the PFM controller of
The function of the circuit of
Although various exemplary embodiments of the invention have been disclosed, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made which will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It will be obvious to those reasonably skilled in the art that other components performing the same functions may be suitably substituted. It should be mentioned that features explained with reference to a specific figure may be combined with features of other figures, even in those not explicitly mentioned. Further, the methods of the invention may be achieved in either all software implementations, using the appropriate processor instructions, or in hybrid implementations that utilize a combination of hardware logic and software logic to achieve the same results. Such modifications to the inventive concept are intended to be covered by the appended claims.