None.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a swivel elbow for use with patient interfaces used in the treatment of sleep disordered breathing.
2. Background of the Invention
Since the invention by Colin Sullivan of the use of nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nasal CPAP) to treat “snoring sickness” (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,310) there have a number of advances directed towards improving the noise and comfort of therapy. In nasal CPAP therapy, a supply of air at positive pressure is delivered to the entrance of a patient's airways via an air delivery conduit and some form of patient interface, such as a mask. The early masks were custom made for each patient and glued on each night. A typical mask comprises:
It is generally desirable for the treatment system (including the source of pressurised air and the patient interface) to be as quiet as possible so as not to disturb sleep.
The supply of air at positive pressure may be provided by a blower, sometimes referred to as a flow generator. Such devices typically include an electric motor and impeller housed in a volute. Spinning the motor (and thus the impeller) generates a flow of air. When the flow is attached to an air circuit, a pressure is created due to the impedance of the circuit. Spinning the motor faster generates a supply of air at higher pressure, but also more noise. As a fluid such as air flows through a pipe or conduit it loses pressure. Bends and curves in the pipe affect the amount of pressure loss. See Perry's Chemical Engineers Handbook 6th Edition, McGrawHill, 1984, Section 5, Fluid and Particle mechanics. The greater the pressure drop in each component (i.e. the higher the impedance) of the air circuit (for example along the air delivery conduit) the harder the blower must work in order to provide sufficient pressure in the patient interface. The harder the blower has to work, the greater noise it will generate. Thus generally it is important to design components in the air path to have a low impedance.
A further reason for minimising the impedance of components in the air path is to minimise pressure swings as the pressure fluctuates within the mask due to the patient breathing. A higher entry impedance at the mask will lead to a higher pressure difference between inspiration and expiration, which may lead to patient discomfort and additional cyclic noise.
The process of air venting from the mask creates noise. Since patients must wear their mask all night while sleeping, there is a need for the vent to be quiet. Some quiet vents are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,561,190 (Kwok et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,561,191 (Kwok et al.). The contents of these two patents are hereby expressly incorporated by cross-reference.
Whilst in some mask designs—such as the ResMed MIRAGE® mask—the air delivery conduit is fixed in position in relation to the frame, other masks—such as the ResMed ULTRA MIRAGE® mask—include a swivel elbow. The swivel elbow enables the air delivery conduit to rotate with respect to the mask. This enables a patient to place the air delivery conduit in a preferred position such as over the head or on the left or right sides. Absent a swivel, inadvertent movement of the air delivery conduit can disrupt the seal and thus therapy.
In designing hard parts for patient interfaces, such as a mask frame and elbow constructed from polycarbonate or similar materials, regard must be had to how the part will be moulded. For ease of manufacture, the tool from which a component is manufactured generally has two parts that form the shape of the component. Once the component has been formed, the tool is opened by withdrawing one part along a ‘line of draw’ that is of constant radius (including a straight line). Parts must be designed within the constraints of what is manufacturable.
Some swivel elbows, such as the one used in ResMed's ULTRA MIRAGE® mask, incorporate a vent. See U.S. Pat. No. 6,691,707 (Gunaratnam et al.). Incorporating a vent in a swivel elbow can allow the patient some control over the direction in which air is vented. Thus the vented air may be directed away from the patient or anyone sleeping close by. Incorporation of a vent in an elbow can simplify moulding of the mask frame.
Vent flow rate, and hence vent CO2 flow rate is a function of the pressure differential between the mask interior and ambient pressure. The higher the differential, the higher the flow rate. With a fixed vent, whether adequate CO2 washout occurs is defined by what happens at the lowest operating mask pressure, typically 4 cmH2O. The flow rate is also a function of vent geometry.
In some prior art vents incorporated in elbows air entering the elbow from a blower can short-circuit the mask and pass straight out the vent.
Another known swivel elbow which includes a vent is described in International Patent Application PCT/AU2003/001162 (published as WO 2004/022147) Drew et al. the contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated by cross-reference. This elbow includes a baffle in the elbow as described in the '1162 PCT application. A commercial version of this elbow is found in ResMed's ACTIVA mask system.
A potential problem with including a baffle in the elbow is that while it may assist with CO2 washout, it may impede flow from the blower. Increased impedance from a baffle may require a blower to work harder to generate enough pressure and thus result in increased noise. A poorly designed baffle and corresponding vent may be unnecessarily noisy. A possible way of avoiding increased impedance is to make the elbow larger overall, however this is undesirable for other reasons such as aesthetics.
In accordance with a first aspect of the invention there is provided a compact low impedance swivel elbow incorporating a quiet vent which provides adequate CO2 washout.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided a swivel elbow including a baffle which divides an interior of the elbow into a conduit pathway and a vent pathway, the baffle being positioned adjacent an interior wall of the conduit pathway.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a swivel elbow including a baffle which defines a part annular vent pathway.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a swivel elbow having separate conduit and vent airflow pathways for conducting respective airflow streams in use and further including baffle structure which separates said respective airflow streams so that they do not interfere with each other within an interior of a mask to which the elbow is connected in use.
Another aspect of the invention is a swivel elbow which incorporates a pressure port.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided a noise reducing structure for separating two airflow streams that pass close to one another.
In accordance with still another aspect of the invention, there is provided a vent elbow comprising a generally L-shaped main body having a frame engaging portion and a base portion, a conduit pathway to deliver an incoming gas flow stream from the base portion towards the frame engaging portion, a vent pathway to allow an outgoing gas flow stream to flow from the frame engaging portion towards a vent formed in the main body, a cylindrical portion extending from the frame engaging portion, and a baffle provided to the main body to separate and at least partly define the conduit pathway and the vent pathway, wherein the baffle is part annular or part cylindrical and has an axis that is concentric with an axis of the cylindrical portion.
These and other aspects of the invention are described in and/or apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments.
a-9e show cross-sections of different variants taken along line 9a-9a of the elbow of
It is noted that two embodiments are shown in the figures. The first embodiment has 100-series numbers, the second embodiment 200-series number. Corresponding features have corresponding numbers, hence the baffle is numbered 160 in the first embodiment and 260 in the second embodiment. Where in the following description reference is made to a feature for one embodiment, generally the same description applies to the second embodiment.
In a preferred form the invention is applied to a swivel elbow. Preferably the swivel elbow is removably replaceable on a mask frame.
A swivel elbow 130 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention has a main body that is generally L-shaped. It comprises a frame-engaging portion 135 and base portion 150. The base portion 150 includes a generally cylindrical section 155 over which in use an end of an air delivery conduit (not shown) may be friction fit (or otherwise engaged). The frame engaging portion 135 includes a series of slots 137 adapted to engage with a frame (not shown). The frame engaging portion also includes generally cylindrical portion 180. See
Within the swivel elbow 130 two fluid pathways are defined by baffle 160. A conduit pathway 175 allows flow between the air delivery conduit and the mask cavity. A vent pathway 170 allows flow between the mask cavity and atmosphere. In one form the vent pathway 170 forms part of an annulus. In a preferred form the baffle 160 is part-cylindrical, having an axis 161 (See
As best seen in the cross-sections shown in
In a preferred form a lip portion 162, 262 the baffle 160, 260 extends more than approximately 1.5 mm, preferably 1.8 mm into the mask cavity. Compare
In some prior devices air from the conduit pathway 275 can flow directly across the inlet 272 of the vent pathway 270 causing an audible tone. The extension of the baffle reduces or prevents air from so passing directly over the inlet 272 and thus reduces or eliminates the tone.
Extension of the baffle into the mask cavity directs incoming airstreams or gas streams (via conduit pathway 175) and outgoing airstreams (via vent pathway 170) so that they do not interfere with each other. Prior art baffles tend to give rise to the situation where there are two narrow and relative fast airstreams moving parallel to each other but in opposite directions. The extended baffle causes the airstreams to remain separate until the inlet air has slowed down and the two airstreams have diverged. Hence there will be much less interference between the streams and the resultant turbulence and increase in noise is avoided.
There are other ways of separating the incoming and outgoing airstreams. Shaping the baffle within the mask cavity as shown in
A swivel elbow as shown in
Another aspect of the invention is the swivel elbow port and its respective port cap. The swivel elbow port 205 is illustrated in
Although the invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the invention. Numerous modifications may be made therein and other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example whilst the invention is particularly useful for use with a swivel elbow, the principles of the invention are applicable to masks with non-swivelling elbows. Furthermore, the principles of the invention which reduce interference between incoming and outgoing air streams are applicable to masks without elbows at all, but simply having inflowing and out flowing airstreams near one another.
This application is the U.S. national phase of international application PCT/AU2005/001091 filed 25 Jul. 2005 which designated the U.S. and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/590,338 filed 23 Jul. 2004, each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2005/001091 | 7/25/2005 | WO | 00 | 12/20/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/007668 | 1/26/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1081745 | Johnston | Dec 1913 | A |
2313999 | Kreiselman | Mar 1943 | A |
4266540 | Panzik et al. | May 1981 | A |
4488548 | Agdanowski | Dec 1984 | A |
4655213 | Rapoport et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4676241 | Webb et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4713844 | Westgate | Dec 1987 | A |
4794921 | Lindkvist | Jan 1989 | A |
4944310 | Sullivan | Jul 1990 | A |
5243971 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5245995 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5349949 | Schegerin | Sep 1994 | A |
5438981 | Starr et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441046 | Starr et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
RE35339 | Rapoport | Oct 1996 | E |
5560354 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5657752 | Landis et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662101 | Ogden et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5694922 | Palmer | Dec 1997 | A |
5704345 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5746201 | Kidd | May 1998 | A |
5918598 | Belfer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921239 | McCall et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937851 | Serowski et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947121 | Marshall | Sep 1999 | A |
6112745 | Lang | Sep 2000 | A |
6112746 | Kwok et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119693 | Kwok et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119694 | Correa et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6192886 | Rudolph | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6347631 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6412487 | Gunaratnam et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6412488 | Barnett et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418928 | Bordewick et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422238 | Lithgow | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435181 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467483 | Kopacko et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491034 | Gunaratnam | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505623 | Hansen | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6530373 | Patron et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536435 | Fecteau et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6561190 | Kwok | May 2003 | B1 |
6561191 | Kwok | May 2003 | B1 |
6581594 | Drew et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6662803 | Gradon et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
D485905 | Moore et al. | Jan 2004 | S |
6675796 | McDonald | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679265 | Strickland et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
D486225 | Guney et al. | Feb 2004 | S |
6691707 | Gunaratnam et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6763828 | Arnott | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6823869 | Raje et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6851425 | Jaffre et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6851427 | Nashed | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6907882 | Ging et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7011090 | Drew et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7316230 | Drew et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7487772 | Ging et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7597100 | Ging et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20020029780 | Frater et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030005931 | Jaffre | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030196656 | Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196657 | Ging | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196658 | Ging et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040112385 | Drew et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060102185 | Drew et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29715718 | Dec 1997 | DE |
29723101 | Jul 1998 | DE |
1258266 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1314446 | May 2003 | EP |
1 356 844 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1057494 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1027905 | Jun 2005 | EP |
799225 | Aug 1958 | GB |
2379886 | Mar 2003 | GB |
2000-233024 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-279520 | Oct 2000 | JP |
WO 9812965 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9834665 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9961088 | Dec 1999 | WO |
20000078381 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0078381 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0078384 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0197893 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0220078 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02096342 | Dec 2002 | WO |
20040022147 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004022147 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080047561 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60590338 | Jul 2004 | US |