The present invention relates to communications systems circuits generally, and more particularly to the amplification, equalization, and frequency compensation of signal receivers for high-speed multi-wire serial interfaces used for chip-to-chip communication.
In modern digital systems, digital information has to be processed in a reliable and efficient way. In this context, digital information is to be understood as information available in discrete, i.e., discontinuous values. Bits, collection of bits, but also numbers from a finite set can be used to represent digital information.
In most chip-to-chip, or device-to-device communication systems, communication takes place over a plurality of wires to increase the aggregate bandwidth. A single or pair of these wires may be referred to as a channel or link and multiple channels create a communication bus between the electronic components. At the physical circuitry level, in chip-to-chip communication systems, buses are typically made of electrical conductors in the package between chips and motherboards, on printed circuit boards (“PCBs”) boards or in cables and connectors between PCBs. In high frequency applications, microstrip or stripline PCB traces may be used.
Common methods for transmitting signals over bus wires include single-ended and differential signaling methods. In applications requiring high speed communications, those methods can be further optimized in terms of power consumption and pin-efficiency, especially in high-speed communications. More recently, vector signaling methods as described in Cronie I, Cronie II, and Cronie III have been proposed to further optimize the trade-offs between power consumption, pin efficiency and noise robustness of chip-to-chip communication systems. In those vector signaling systems, the digital information is transformed into a different representation space in the form of a vector codeword that is chosen in order to optimize the power consumption, pin-efficiency and speed trade-offs based on the transmission channel properties and communication system design constraints.
Communications signal receiver circuits providing amplification and frequency compensation are described, incorporating particular design features providing increased signal gain without increased noise, thus an increased signal-to-noise or SNR ratio. Certain embodiments also provide improved signal dynamic range and linearity. In some applications the potential gain increase may be traded off for extended bandwidth, support for support additional signal inputs, and/or lower power.
A receiver for vector signaling encoded information accepts multiple wire inputs corresponding to the multiple components of a codeword. Commonly, different voltage, current, etc. levels are used for signaling and more than two levels might be used to represent each codeword element, such as a ternary signaling code wherein each wire signal has one of three values. Receivers may incorporate amplification, frequency-dependent amplification, signal conditioning, and filtering such as obtained with the continuous time linear equalization or “CTLE” filtering method. These functions may be embodied individually, or combined into multifunction circuits. As will be shown, such multifunction circuits may reduce power consumption, facilitate improved signal to noise ratio, increase circuit dynamic range, and/or enable higher speed signaling.
In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, circuits are described for the efficient equalization and pre-sample-processing of vector signal coded data transmitted over physical channels such that the signals are resilient to common mode noise, do not require a common reference at the transmission and reception points, and can produce a higher pin efficiency than conventional differential signaling with relatively low power dissipation for encoding and decoding.
In a practical embodiment, signals may undergo significant change in amplitude, waveform, and other characteristics between transmitter and receiver, due to the transmission characteristics of communications channel. Using one contemporary embodiment as an example, 400 mV amplitude signals at the transmitter may be attenuated by the channel to less than 20 mV at the receiver, with significantly greater attenuation at higher frequencies resulting in slow signal transitions and other distortions. At these low signal amplitudes, receiver noise becomes a significant issue, with the inherent noise level of the first amplifier stage often constraining the achievable signal-to-noise ratio of the overall system. Receiver dynamic range is also significant, as the same receiver design expected to operate with high attenuation signal paths may also be used with extremely short and thus low attenuation connections.
Basic MOS Amplifier Characteristics
The basic characteristics of MOS transistor amplifiers as illustrated in
In a differential configuration such as shown in
Thus, the model of
A practical embodiment of
A first signal input is provided at an input node Vg1 with a direct connection to the inverting input of the first amplification element M1, and a second signal input is provided at an input node Vg2 with a direct connection to the inverting input of the second amplification element M2. There is also a frequency-dependent connection from the first signal input Vg1 to the non-inverting input of the second amplification element M2. This frequency-dependent connection is made through a series capacitor with capacitance Cs. In addition, there is another frequency-dependent connection from the second signal input Vg2 to the non-inverting input of the first amplification element M1. This frequency-dependent connection is also made through a series capacitor with capacitance Cs. These frequency-dependent connections increase the gain of the differential amplification provided by the first and second amplification elements, particularly at high frequencies.
In an alternative embodiment (not illustrated), the roles of the inverting and non-inverting inputs of the amplification elements are reversed. In such an embodiment, the first signal input Vg1 is provided with a direct connection to the non-inverting input of the first amplification element M1, and a second signal input Vg2 is provided with a direct connection to the non-inverting input of the second amplification element M2. There is also a frequency-dependent connection from the first signal input Vgi to the inverting input of the second amplification element M2, and another frequency-dependent connection from the second signal input Vg2 to the inverting input of the first amplification element M1. Thus, the frequency-dependent connections utilize the opposite amplification element input from the direct connections, resulting in increased gain.
The frequency-dependent CTLE characteristics may be computed in a similar manner as with a conventional CTLE design. Generally, Cs in an embodiment such as shown in
Extensions to Support ENRZ
Ensemble NRZ (also know as ENRZ or H4 code) is a proprietary vector signaling code providing significant benefits over conventional NRZ and differential pair operation. As described in [Fox IV], ENRZ encodes three bits of information over four wires, using all possible permutations of the signal vectors (+1, −1/3, −1/3, −1/3) and (−1, .+1/3, +1/3, +1/3). Thus, ENRZ is a balanced quaternary code, although any single codeword uses only two of the four possible signal levels. The balanced codewords give ENRZ desirable pseudo-differential characteristics, including low SSO noise, induced noise immunity, and reference-less receiver operation.
The [Ulrich I] reference describes use of extended differential amplifier circuits to perform analog computations on vector signaling code signals as part of code detection. Analog computation circuits for decoding ENRZ vector codes perform calculations of the form shown in Equation 1 where J, K, L, M are variables representing the symbol values of the four input signals values.
R=(J+L)−(K+M) (Eqn. 1)
It may be noted that applying three instances of Equation 1 with different permutations of receive signal input values to the four variables is sufficient to detect each code word of ENRZ. As one example and without limitation, the input permutations producing the three results R0, R1, R2 based on Equations 2, 3 and 4 are sufficient to unambiguously identify each code word of vector signaling code ENRZ as represented by receive signal input values A, B, C, D. As these equations describe linear combinations using only sums and differences, it will be apparent that other equivalent equations, as one example presenting a sum of two differences, may be produced using normal arithmetic factoring and grouping operations.
R0=(A+C)−(B+D) (Eqn. 2)
R1=(C+D)−(A+B) (Eqn. 3)
R2=(C+B)−(D+A) (Eqn. 4)
Architecturally, it is convenient to perform such detection operations at or near the receiver input, and high speed capability requires an efficient, high performance embodiment. In accordance with at least one aspect of the invention, a two input differential input circuit such as shown in
The embodiment illustrated in
(Vg1−Vg2)+(Vg3−Vg4)
In this first ENRZ configuration, the maximum amplification is 2×gm×RL and the noise is 2×nrms, leading to a SNR of gm×RL/nrms with a current consumption of 4×Id. Compared to well-known ENRZ CTLE circuits, the embodiment of
Thus, in the example of
An alternative embodiment providing equivalent ENRZ CTLE functionality is illustrated in
Another alternative embodiment providing equivalent ENRZ CLTE functionality is illustrated in
A system embodiment of an ENRZ detector using three instances of the circuit of
Equivalent embodiments may also be obtained by incorporating three identical instances of any of the circuits of
The circuit of
A further embodiment as shown in
Complementary Gain Stages
Although PMOS transistors may have poorer high-frequency characteristics than their equivalent NMOS transistors in some integrated circuit processes, this constraint does not provide an absolute limit on overall circuit performance. Overall frequency response of this circuit in a practical embodiment is approximately an interpolation between the native frequency characteristics of its component P- and N-MOS transistors, and those frequency characteristics are also much closer to parity in current integrated circuit processes.
This circuit has also been extensively analyzed for linearity issues, and has been found to be somewhat better than known art designs, where cutoff of one of the single input transistors introduces clipping.
Further Extensions
One familiar with the art will recognize that the same approaches previously shown in
A further embodiment shown in
A first load impedance is shared by the first amplification element and third amplification element, and a second load impedance is shared by the second amplification element and fourth amplification element. First, second, third, and fourth signal input nodes (Vg1, Vg2, Vg3, Vg4, respectively) each are directly connected to a first input of the corresponding first, second, third, and fourth amplification elements, respectively. There is also a frequency-dependent connection of the first, second, third, and fourth signal inputs to the second input of the fourth, third, second, and first amplification elements, respectively. The signals obtained by the first output node Out1 at the first load impedance and by the second output node Out2 at the second load impedance represent inverted and non-inverted sums of differences of the input signals. Other known techniques for introducing frequency-dependent gain into an amplifier circuit are also directly applicable to the described embodiments. As one example, the load resistance described herein may optionally be comprised of a combination of resistance and inductance, or inductance alone, to provide additional high-frequency gain peaking or bandwidth extension.
The principles described herein may be extended to circuits employing various numbers of differential pairs and employing different topologies of frequency-dependent couplings. In some embodiments, an analog computation circuit includes at least two differential pairs of amplification elements. The amplification elements may include, for example, individual MOS transistors or CMOS amplifier pairs. Each of the amplification elements has an inverting input and a non-inverting input. In some embodiments, the inverting input is an input at a gate of an NMOS transistor, while the non-inverting input is an input at the source of the NMSOS transistor.
Each of the differential pairs of amplification elements includes a first amplification element and a second amplification element. The first amplification elements have outputs connected to a first differential summing output node, and the second amplification elements have outputs connected to a second differential summing output node. In some embodiments, the differential summing output nodes are connected to respective load impedance. In such embodiments, the voltage across the load resistor has a value that reflects of a sum of outputs of the connected amplification elements. In other embodiments, the differential summing output nodes could be connected to a current mirror or other circuitry adapted to provide an output that reflects a sum of the outputs of the connected amplification elements.
The analog computation circuit is further provided with a plurality of gain-enhancing couplings, such as capacitive couplings. These capacitive couplings fall under two groups: a first plurality and second plurality of gain-enhancing capacitive couplings. Each of the first plurality of gain-enhancing capacitive couplings connects the inverting input of one of the first amplification elements with the non-inverting input of one of the second amplification elements. Each of the second plurality of gain-enhancing capacitive couplings connects the inverting input of one of the second amplification elements with the non-inverting input of one of the first amplification elements. These couplings operate to enhance the gain of the analog computation circuit because each input is represented twice in the output of the analog computation circuit: first as an inverting input that reduces the output at one of the output nodes, and second (through the coupling) as a non-inverting input that increases the output at the opposite output node.
The gain-enhancing capacitive couplings can be connected in various arrangements. In some embodiments, each of first and second plurality of capacitive couplings is connected between amplification elements in the same differential pair, as illustrated in
Preferably, each of the inverting inputs is coupled with a unique non-inverting input. That is, each of the inverting inputs of the first amplification elements is connected through one of the first plurality of capacitive couplings with the non-inverting input of a respective second amplification element, and conversely, each of the inverting inputs of the second amplification elements is connected through one of the second plurality of capacitive couplings with the non-inverting input of a respective first amplification element.
The analog computation circuit further includes a plurality of signal input nodes. In some embodiments, each of the signal input nodes has a direct connection to the inverting input of a respective one of the amplification elements. In other embodiments, each of the signal input nodes has a direct connection to the non-inverting input of a respective one of the amplification elements.
In some embodiments, the analog computation circuits described herein are employed in a vector signal decoder. As described above, the ENRZ vector code encodes three bits of information over four wires, using all possible permutations of the signal vectors (+1, −1/3, −1/3, −1/3) and (−1, +1/3, +1/3, +1/3). Where the voltages on the four wires are represented as (A, B, C, D), each of the analog computation circuits can decode one bit of the three-bit code by performing one of the operations described in Equations 2-4, above. Three such circuits operate in parallel on different permutations of the input voltages to return the values of R0, R1, and R2. An exemplary vector signal decoder is illustrated in
Mention of particular vector signaling codes such as ENRZ in the examples herein are made for purposes of explanation, and are not limiting. Circuits and circuit design elements described herein may be utilized to amplify, equalize, and/or detect signals representing other codes. One familiar with the art will recognize that circuits and circuit design elements described herein may be readily combined with known art to produce further embodiments of the invention.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. Pat. No. 9,148,087 issued Sep. 29, 2015, entitled “Symmetric Linear Equalization Circuit with Increased Gain,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. The following references are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes: U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0268225 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/784,414, filed May 20, 2010, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling” (hereinafter “Cronie I”); U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0302478 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/982,777, filed Dec. 30, 2010, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Power and Pin Efficient Chip-to-Chip Communications with Common-Mode Resilience and SSO Resilience” (hereinafter “Cronie II”); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/030,027, filed Feb. 17, 2011, naming Harm Cronie, Amin Shokrollahi and Armin Tajalli, entitled “Methods and Systems for Noise Resilient, Pin-Efficient and Low Power Communications with Sparse Signaling Codes” (hereinafter “Cronie III”); U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/753,870, filed Jan. 17, 2013, naming John Fox, Brian Holden, Peter Hunt, John D Keay, Amin Shokrollahi, Richard Simpson, Anant Singh, Andrew Kevin John Stewart, and Giuseppe Surace, entitled “Methods and Systems for Chip-to-chip Communication with Reduced Simultaneous Switching Noise” (hereinafter called “Fox I”); U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/763,403, filed Feb. 11, 2013, naming John Fox, Brian Holden, Ali Hormati, Peter Hunt, John D Keay, Amin Shokrollahi, Anant Singh, Andrew Kevin John Stewart, Giuseppe Surace, and Roger Ulrich, entitled “Methods and Systems for High Bandwidth Chip-to-Chip Communications Interface” (hereinafter called “Fox II”); U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/773,709, filed Mar. 6, 2013, naming John Fox, Brian Holden, Peter Hunt, John D Keay, Amin Shokrollahi, Andrew Kevin John Stewart, Giuseppe Surace, and Roger Ulrich, entitled “Methods and Systems for High Bandwidth Chip-to-Chip Communications Interface” (hereinafter called “Fox III”); U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/812,667, filed Apr. 16, 2013, naming John Fox, Brian Holden, Ali Hormati, Peter Hunt, John D Keay, Amin Shokrollahi, Anant Singh, Andrew Kevin John Stewart, and Giuseppe Surace, entitled “Methods and Systems for High Bandwidth Communications Interface” (hereinafter called “Fox IV”); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/542599, filed Jul. 5, 2012, naming Armin Tajalli, Harm Cronie, and Amin Shokrollahi entitled “Methods and Circuits for Efficient Processing and Detection of Balanced Codes” (hereafter called “Tajalli I”.) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/842,740, filed Mar. 15, 2013, naming Brian Holden, Amin Shokrollahi, and Anant Singh, entitled “Methods and Systems for Skew Tolerance in and Advanced Detectors for Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communication” (hereinafter called “Holden I”) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/895,206, filed May 15, 2013, naming Roger Ulrich and Peter Hunt, entitled “Circuits for Efficient Detection of Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communications using Sums of Differences” (hereinafter called “Ulrich I”).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3196351 | Slepian | Jul 1965 | A |
3636463 | Ongkiehong | Jan 1972 | A |
3939468 | Mastin | Feb 1976 | A |
4163258 | Ebihara et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4181967 | Nash et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4206316 | Burnsweig et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4276543 | Miller | Jun 1981 | A |
4486739 | Franaszeck et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4499550 | Ray et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4774498 | Traa | Sep 1988 | A |
4864303 | Ofek | Sep 1989 | A |
4897657 | Brubaker | Jan 1990 | A |
5053974 | Penz | Oct 1991 | A |
5166956 | Baltus et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168509 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5283761 | Gillingham | Feb 1994 | A |
5287305 | Yoshida | Feb 1994 | A |
5412689 | Chan et al. | May 1995 | A |
5449895 | Hecht | Sep 1995 | A |
5459465 | Kagey | Oct 1995 | A |
5511119 | Lechleider | Apr 1996 | A |
5553097 | Dagher | Sep 1996 | A |
5599550 | Kohlruss et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5624699 | Lang | Apr 1997 | A |
5659353 | Kostreski et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5802356 | Gaskins | Sep 1998 | A |
5825808 | Hershey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5875202 | Venters | Feb 1999 | A |
5945935 | Kusumoto | Aug 1999 | A |
5995016 | Perino | Nov 1999 | A |
6005895 | Perino et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6084883 | Norrell et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6172634 | Leonowich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175230 | Hamblin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6232908 | Nakaigawa | May 2001 | B1 |
6278740 | Nordyke | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6346907 | Dacy | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359931 | Perino et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6404820 | Postol | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417737 | Moloudi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6452420 | Wong | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6483828 | Balachandran | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6504875 | Perino et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509773 | Buchwald | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6556628 | Poulton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563382 | Yang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6621427 | Greenstreet | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624699 | Yin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6650638 | Walker et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6661355 | Cornelius et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6766342 | Kechriotis | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6839429 | Gaikwald et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6865234 | Agazzi | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865236 | Terry | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6954492 | Williams | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6990138 | Bejjani | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991038 | Bejjani et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999516 | Rajan | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7023817 | Kuffner | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7053802 | Cornelius | May 2006 | B2 |
7085153 | Ferrant et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7142612 | Horowitz et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142865 | Tsai | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7167019 | Broyde et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7180949 | Kleveland et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184483 | Rajan | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7335976 | Chen | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356213 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7358869 | Chiarulli et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7362130 | Broyde et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7389333 | Moore et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7428273 | Foster | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7633850 | Ahn | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643588 | Visalli | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656321 | Wang | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7697915 | Behzad | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706524 | Zerbe | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7746764 | Rawlins et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7787572 | Scharf et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7841909 | Murray | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7869497 | Benvenuto | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882413 | Chen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7933770 | Kruger et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8064535 | Wiley | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8091006 | Prasad et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8106806 | Toyomura | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8159375 | Abbasafar | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8159376 | Abbasfar | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8199849 | Oh | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8253454 | Lin | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8279094 | Abbasfar | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295250 | Gorokhov | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8310389 | Chui | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8406315 | Tsai | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8429495 | Przybylski | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442099 | Sederat | May 2013 | B1 |
8442210 | Zerbe | May 2013 | B2 |
8443223 | Abbasfar | May 2013 | B2 |
8462891 | Kizer et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8498368 | Husted | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8520493 | Goulahsen | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8547272 | Nestler et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8578246 | Mittelholzer | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588280 | Oh et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593305 | Tajalli et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8638241 | Sudhakaran | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8649556 | Cronie | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8649840 | Ware et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8718184 | Cronie | May 2014 | B1 |
8780687 | Clausen | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8782578 | Tell | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8879660 | Peng | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8949693 | Ordentlich | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8951072 | Hashim | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8989317 | Holden | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9036764 | Hossain | May 2015 | B1 |
9069995 | Cronie | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9077386 | Holden | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9093791 | Liang | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9100232 | Hormati | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9281785 | Sjoland | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9331962 | Lida | May 2016 | B2 |
9362974 | Fox | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20010006538 | Simon et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010055344 | Lee et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020034191 | Shattil | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044316 | Myers | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020057292 | Robb | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057592 | Robb | May 2002 | A1 |
20020154633 | Shin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163881 | Dhong | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174373 | Chang | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030048210 | Kiehl | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071745 | Greenstreet | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030105908 | Perino et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030146783 | Brandy et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030227841 | Tateishi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003336 | Cypher | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003337 | Cypher | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040057525 | Rajan et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040086059 | Eroz et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040156432 | Hidaka | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050057379 | Jansson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050135182 | Perino et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149833 | Worley | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152385 | Cioffi | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174841 | Ho | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213686 | Love et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050286643 | Ozawa et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060018344 | Pamarti | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060115027 | Srebranig | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060159005 | Rawlins et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060269005 | Laroia et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070030796 | Green | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070188367 | Yamada | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070260965 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263711 | Kramer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283210 | Prasad et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080104374 | Mohamed | May 2008 | A1 |
20080159448 | Dankwa | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169846 | Lan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080273623 | Chung et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080284524 | Kushiyama | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090059782 | Cole | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092196 | Okunev | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132758 | Jiang | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154500 | Diab et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163612 | Lee et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090185636 | Palotai et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090193159 | Li | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090212861 | Lim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228767 | Oh et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090257542 | Evans et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100020898 | Stojanovic | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100046644 | Mazet | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100104047 | Chen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100180143 | Ware et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205506 | Hara | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100296550 | Abou Rjeily | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100296556 | Rave | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309964 | Oh | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110014865 | Seo et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110051854 | Kizer et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110084737 | Oh et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110127990 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110235501 | Goulahsen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110268225 | Cronie et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299555 | Cronie et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302478 | Cronie et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317559 | Kern et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120063291 | Hsueh | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120152901 | Nagorny | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161945 | Single | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120213299 | Cronie et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130010892 | Cronie et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051162 | Amirkhany et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130259113 | Kumar | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140016724 | Cronie | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140198837 | Fox et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140226455 | Schumacher | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140254730 | Kim et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010044 | Zhang | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150078479 | Whitby-Stevens | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150333940 | Shokrollahi | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150381232 | Ulrich | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160020796 | Hormati | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160020824 | Ulrich | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036616 | Holden | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101478286 | Jul 2009 | CN |
2039221 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2003163612 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2009084121 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2010031824 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2011119359 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Nov. 5, 2012, in International Patent Application S.N. PCT/EP2012/052767, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Jul. 14, 2011 in International Patent Application S.N. PCT/EP2011/002170, 10 pages. |
Healey, A., et al., “A Comparison of 25 Gbps NRZ & PAM-4 Modulation used in Legacy & Premium Backplane Channels”, DesignCon 2012, 16 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/053563, dated Nov. 11, 2014, 2 pages. |
Clayton, P., “Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility”, Wiley-Interscience, 2006. |
She et al., “A Framework of Cross-Layer Superposition Coded Multicast for Robust IPTV Services over WiMAX,” IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the WCNC 2008 proceedings, Mar. 31-Apr. 3, 2008, pp. 3139-3144. |
Poulton, et al., “Multiwire Differential Signaling”, UNC-CH Department of Computer Science Version 1.1, Aug. 6, 2003. |
Skliar et al., A Method for the Analysis of Signals: the Square-Wave Method, Mar. 2008, Revista de Matematica: Teoria y Aplicationes, pp. 09-129. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2014/034220 mailed Aug. 21, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US14/052986 mailed Nov. 24, 2014. |
Burr, “Spherical Codes for M-ARY Code Shift Keying”, University of York, Apr. 2, 1989, pp. 67-72, United Kingdom. |
Slepian, D., “Premutation Modulation”, IEEE, vol. 52, No. 3, Mar. 1965, pp. 228-236. |
Stan, M., et al., “Bus-Invert Coding for Low-Power I/O, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems”, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1995, pp. 49-58. |
Tallani, L., et al., “Transmission Time Analysis for the Parallel Asynchronous Communication Scheme”, IEEE Tranactions on Computers, vol. 52, No. 5, May 2003, pp. 558-571. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2012/052767 mailed May 11, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2011/059279 mailed Sep. 22, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2011/074219 mailed Jul. 4, 2012. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT/EP2013/002681, dated Feb. 25, 2014, 15 pages. |
Ericson, T., et al., “Spherical Codes Generated by Binary Partitions of Symmetric Pointsets”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 41, No. 1, Jan. 1995, pp. 107-129. |
Farzan, K., et al., “Coding Schemes for Chip-to-Chip Interconnect Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 14, No. 4, Apr. 2006, pp. 393-406. |
Abbasfar, A., “Generalized Differential Vector Signaling”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC '09, (Jun. 14, 2009), pp. 1-5. |
Dasilva et al., “Multicarrier Orthogonal CDMA Signals for Quasi-Synchronous Communication Systems”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 12, No. 5 (Jun. 1, 1994), pp. 842-852. |
Wang et al., “Applying CDMA Technique to Network-on-Chip”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 15, No. 10 (Oct. 1, 2007), pp. 1091-1100. |
Cheng, W., “Memory Bus Encoding for Low Power: A Tutorial”, Quality Electronic Design, IEEE, International Symposium on Mar. 26-28, 2001, pp. 199-204, Piscataway, NJ. |
Brown, L., et al., “V.92: The Last Dial-Up Modem?”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ., USA, vol. 52, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2004, pp. 54-61. XP011106836, ISSN: 0090-6779, DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2003.822168, pp. 55-59. |
Notification of Transmittal of International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, for PCT/US2015/018363, mailed Jun. 18, 2015, 13 pages. |
Counts, L., et al., “One-Chip Slide Rule Works with Logs, Antilogs for Real-Time Processing,” Analog Devices Computational Products 6, Reprinted from Electronic Design, May 2, 1985, 7 pages. |
Design Brief 208 Using the Anadigm Multiplier CAM, Copyright 2002 Anadigm, 6 pages. |
Grahame, J., “Vintage Analog Computer Kits,” posted on Aug. 25, 2006 in Classic Computing, 2 pages, http.//www.retrothing.com/2006/08/classic—analog—.html. |
Schneider, J., et al., “ELEC301 Project: Building an Analog Computer,” Dec. 19, 1999, 8 pages, http://www.clear.rice.edu/elec301/Projects99/anlgcomp/. |
Tierney, J., et al., “A digital frequency synthesizer,” Audio and Electroacoustics, IEEE Transactions, Mar. 1971, pp. 48-57, vol. 19, Issue 1, 1 page Abstract from http://ieeexplore. |
“Introduction to: Analog Computers and the DSPACE System,” Course Material ECE 5230 Spring 2008, Utah State University, www.coursehero.com, 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2014/015840, dated May 20, 2014, 11 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2014/043965, dated Oct. 22, 2014, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or The Declaration, dated Mar. 3, 2015, for PCT/US2014/066893, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/015840, dated Aug. 11, 2015, 7 pages. |
Jiang, A., et al., “Rank Modulation for Flash Memories”, IEEE Transactions of Information Theory, Jun. 2006, vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 2659-2673. |
Zouhair Ben-Neticha et al, “The streTched-Golay and other codes for high-SNR finite-delay quantization of the Gaussian source at 1/2 Bit per sample”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 38, No. 12 Dec. 1, 1990, pp. 2089-2093, XP000203339, ISSN: 0090-6678, DOI: 10.1109/26.64647. |
Oh, et al., Pseudo-Differential Vector Signaling for Noise Reduction in Single-Ended Signaling, DesignCon 2009. |
Loh, M., et al., “A 3×9 Gb/s Shared, All-Digital CDR for High-Speed, High-Density I/O”, Matthew Loh, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vo. 47, No. 3, Mar. 2012. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/039952, dated Sep. 23, 2015, 8 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/041161, dated Oct. 7, 2015, 8 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT/US2015/043463, dated Oct. 16, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/034220, dated Oct. 20, 2015, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160072449 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14280305 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 14869346 | US |