The present invention relates to medical implants, and more specifically to a permanent magnet arrangement for use in such implants.
Some hearing implants such as Middle Ear Implants (MEI's) and Cochlear Implants (CI's) employ attachment magnets in the implantable part and an external part to hold the external part magnetically in place over the implant. For example, as shown in
One problem arises when the patient undergoes Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination. Interactions occur between the implant magnet and the applied external magnetic field for the MRI. As shown in
Thus, for existing implant systems with magnet arrangements, it is common to either not permit MRI or at most limit use of MRI to lower field strengths. Other existing solutions include use of surgically removable magnets, spherical implant magnets (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 7,566,296), and various ring magnet designs (e.g., U.S. Patent Publication 20110022120), all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Among those solutions that do not require surgery to remove the magnet, the spherical magnet design may be the most convenient and safest option for MRI removal even at very high field strengths. But the spherical magnet arrangement requires a relatively large magnet much larger than the thickness of the other components of the implant, thereby increasing the volume occupied by the implant. This in turn can create its own problems. For example, some systems, such as cochlear implants, are implanted between the skin and underlying bone. The “spherical bump” of the magnet housing therefore requires preparing a recess into the underlying bone. This is an additional step during implantation in such applications which can be very challenging or even impossible in case of very young children.
Various complicated arrangements of magnetic elements have been described for use in hearing implant applications. See for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,549,532; U.S. Pat. No. 7,608,035; U.S. Patent Publication 20110022120; and U.S. Patent Publication 20110264172, which are incorporated herein by reference. However, there is no suggestion that such therapeutic arrangements might potentially have any utility for magnetic attachment applications such as those described above.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to an arrangement for a medical implant system. An implantable housing has an outer surface configured to lie under and parallel to the skin of the implanted patient. An implant magnet arrangement is located within the implantable housing and has multiple local magnetic sections with different independent local magnetic fields that are combined together to form a net magnetic field with at least two-fold symmetry (e.g., radial symmetry) and zero net magnetic dipole moment, wherein the magnetic fields are oriented parallel to the outer surface of the implant housing.
The implant magnet arrangement may have an inner local magnetic section having a first local magnetic field and an outer circumference local magnetic section having a second local magnetic field, wherein the first local magnetic field and the second local magnetic field have different directional orientations; for example, the implant magnet arrangement may be disk shaped. There may be at least one local magnetic field with a directional orientation emanating from a common radial center and/or a directional orientation with substantially parallel magnetic field lines.
The implant magnet arrangement may function as a holding magnet to magnetically interact with an external magnet arrangement in an external device to hold the external device in a fixed position on the skin of the patient user. Or the implant magnet arrangement may function as an actuator magnet in an implantable transducer to generate a mechanical vibration signal in the patient user.
Embodiments of the present invention also are directed to an implantable transducer arrangement for a medical implant system for a patient user. An implantable housing has an outer surface configured to lie under and parallel to the skin of the implanted patient. A magnetic transducer is located within the implantable housing and is adapted to magnetically interact with an external magnetic drive component on the skin of the patient user to develop a mechanical stimulation signal to the implantable housing. The magnetic transducer includes a transducer magnet arrangement having multiple local magnetic sections with different independent local magnetic fields that are combined together to form a net magnetic field with at least two-fold symmetry (e.g., radial symmetry) and zero net magnetic dipole moment, wherein the magnetic fields are oriented parallel to the outer surface of the implant housing
In further such embodiments, the transducer magnet arrangement includes an inner local magnetic section having a first local magnetic field and an outer circumference local magnetic section having a second local magnetic field, wherein the first local magnetic field and the second local magnetic field have different directional orientations. The transducer magnet arrangement may have a disk shape. At least one local magnetic field may have a directional orientation emanating from a common radial center and/or a directional orientation with substantially parallel magnetic field lines.
There may also be one or more suspension elements that are resiliently attached to the transducer magnet arrangement so that the magnetic transducer forms a coupled oscillating system with the external magnetic drive component. For example, the transducer magnet arrangement may include an inner local magnet and an outer circumference local magnet, wherein the one or more suspension elements resiliently connect the local magnets to each other.
In any of the above, the medical implant system may be a hearing implant system such as a cochlear implant system, a middle ear implant system, a bone conduction hearing implant system, or a vestibular implant system.
Various embodiments of the present invention are directed to a two-fold symmetric implant magnet arrangement (e.g., radially symmetric) for a medical implant system including without limitation hearing implants (cochlear implant, middle ear implant, bone conduction implant, or vestibular implant), visual implants and laryngeal pacemakers. The magnet arrangement produces a low torque in the presence of an external homogenous magnetic field such as for an MRI examination, yet the near field magnetic force (for magnetic interaction with a corresponding external holding magnet) is high enough to be comparable to that produced by a conventional cylindrical magnet. Such magnet arrangements can be useful both for functioning as a holding magnet component to hold an external unit in a desired position on the skin of the patient user, and also for functioning as an actuator magnet in a mechanical stimulation implant such as a bone conduction implant.
The implant magnet 400 may function as an actuator magnet in an implantable transducer to generate a mechanical vibration signal in the patient user.
Typically, the external device 403 would include a transmitter driving coil 404 for transmitting a communications signal through the skin. The external device 403 senses environmental sound (via a microphone—not shown) and converts the acoustic information to an electromagnetic driving signal through the skin to the implant magnet 401 that responsively vibrates. The transducer housing 408 couples the vibration to the skull bone and by bone conduction to the fluid within the cochlea where it is perceived as sound. As compared to the implant magnet arrangement 300 in
A two-fold symmetric implant magnet may be a single piece radially symmetric magnet as shown in
The implant magnet also may have any convenient specific shape with at least two-fold symmetry in the sense that the shape looks the same after a 180-degree rotation. That is the implant magnet may have radial symmetry as with a circular disk, an annular ring disk with a center hole, or a polygonal disk shape. Such shapes may be either freely rotatable about the radial center or non-rotatably fixed within the implantable housing. Or the implant magnet may not have radial symmetry as such, but still have at least two-fold symmetry as in the embodiments shown in
In a typical hearing implant system application, the implant magnet may be in an implantable housing with additional functional elements such as a receiving coil for transcutaneously receiving an implant communication signal from an external transmitter device fixedly attached on the skin of the implant patient by the holding force of an external magnet arrangement adapted for magnetic interaction with the implant magnet.
Embodiments of the present invention also are directed to an implantable transducer arrangement for a medical implant system for a patient user based on the implant magnet arrangements described above.
In the specific embodiment shown in
Although various exemplary embodiments of the invention have been disclosed, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made which will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the true scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/669,161, filed Jul. 9, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3487403 | Pihl | Dec 1969 | A |
3573812 | Pihl | Apr 1971 | A |
3801767 | Marks | Apr 1974 | A |
3987967 | Kuznetsov et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4038990 | Thompson | Aug 1977 | A |
4199741 | Serrus Paulet | Apr 1980 | A |
4257936 | Matsumoto et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4317969 | Riegler et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4549532 | Baermann | Oct 1985 | A |
4596971 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4628907 | Epley | Dec 1986 | A |
4785816 | Dow et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
RE32947 | Dormer et al. | Jun 1989 | E |
4868530 | Ahs | Sep 1989 | A |
4918745 | Hutchison | Apr 1990 | A |
5015224 | Maniglia | May 1991 | A |
5183056 | Dalen et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5434549 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5456654 | Ball | Oct 1995 | A |
5538219 | Osterbrink | Jul 1996 | A |
5554096 | Ball | Sep 1996 | A |
5624376 | Ball et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630835 | Brownlee | May 1997 | A |
5716407 | Knapp et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724014 | Leikus et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5749912 | Zhang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5800336 | Ball et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857958 | Ball et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5877664 | Jackson, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897486 | Ball et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5913815 | Ball et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6040762 | Tompkins | Mar 2000 | A |
6067474 | Schulman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6175767 | Doyle, Sr. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178079 | Renger | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178353 | Griffith et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190305 | Ball et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208235 | Trontelj | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208882 | Lenarz et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217508 | Ball et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219580 | Faltys et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6292678 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295472 | Rubinstein et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313551 | Hazelton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6348070 | Teissl et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358281 | Berrang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6475134 | Ball et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505062 | Ritter et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506987 | Woods | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522909 | Garibaldi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6838963 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7091806 | Zimmerling et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7190247 | Zimmerling | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7266209 | House | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7338035 | Tsai | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7566296 | Zimmerling et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7608035 | Farone | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7642887 | Zimmerling | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20020066702 | Liu | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040012470 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050001703 | Zimmerling | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050062567 | Zimmerling et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060244560 | Zimmerling et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070100197 | Perkins | May 2007 | A1 |
20070191673 | Ball et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070274551 | Tsai et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090209806 | Hakansson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100004716 | Zimmerling et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100145135 | Ball et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100324355 | Spitaels et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022120 | Ball et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110216927 | Ball | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264172 | Zimmerling | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120029267 | Ball | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120296155 | Ball | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130002382 | Zhang | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2031896 | Apr 2009 | EP |
1468890 | Mar 1977 | GB |
04023821 | Jan 2004 | JP |
1690749 | Nov 1991 | SU |
WO 97032629 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 0010361 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 03036560 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03081976 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03092326 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004114723 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2011011409 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011133747 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response A filed May 14, 2007 to Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,322, 14 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response B filed Jun. 17, 2008 to Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,322, 10 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response C filed Sep. 19, 2008 to Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/671,132, 8 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response D filed Jan. 5, 2009 to Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/671,132, 13 pages. |
European Patent Office, European Search Report (Extended) pertaining to Application No. 08075886.5-2205/12031896, date of mailing Jun. 3, 2009, 8 pages. |
Heller et al, “Evaluation of MRI Compatibility of the Modified Nucleus Multichannel Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implants”, The American J. Of Otology 17(5); pp. 724-729 (Sep. 1996). |
Hobbs, et al, “Magnetic Resonance Image—Guided Proteomics of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme”, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging; pp. 530-536 (2003). |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report International Application No. PCT/IB03/02283, date of mailing Nov. 28, 2003, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees—International Application No. PCT/IB2004/002588, date of mailing Dec. 20, 2004, 4 pages. |
Teissl et al, “Cochlear Implants: In Vitro Investigation of Electromagnetic Interference at MR Imaging—Compatibility and Safety Aspects”, Radiology 208(3); pp. 700-708 (Sep. 1998). |
Teissl et al, “Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cochlear Implants: Compatibility and Safety Aspects”, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 9(1); pp. 26-38 (Jan. 1999). |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,322, 6 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,322, 14 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/671,132, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Authorized Officer Lee W. Young, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US11/41045, mailed Oct. 25, 2011, 10 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Authorized Officer Shane Thomas, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US12/70823, date of mailing Mar. 13, 2013, 13 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Authorized Office Shane Thomas, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US13/28183, date of mailing May 10, 2013, 13 pages. |
International Searching Authority, Authorized Officer Frank Liebmann, International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2013/049642, date of mailing Jan. 8, 2014, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140012071 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61669161 | Jul 2012 | US |