Field of the Invention
Devices, systems, and methods consistent with the invention relate to welding, and more specifically related to welding employing synchronized magnetic arc steering with either a GMAW or GTAW operation.
Description of the Related Art
It is known that magnetic fields are created during the welding process because of the flow of electric current through the welding arc and in the work piece. The presence of these magnetic fields can sometimes cause issues such as arc blow, where the arc becomes unstable during the welding operation. Thus, procedures and equipment have been developed to try and stabilize or move a welding arc using a separate magnetic field.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention is a welding system and method for welding having a welding power supply which outputs a welding current signal to an electrode so that a welding arc is generated between said electrode and a workpiece, where the welding current signal has a plurality of current pulses. Also provided is a magnetic field power supply which outputs a magnetic field current signal to a magnetic steering device, where the magnetic field current signal has a plurality of magnetic current pulses. The magnetic steering device is positioned adjacent to the welding arc and the magnetic steering device uses the magnetic field current signal to generate a magnetic field to move the welding arc during welding. Further, the magnetic field current signal is synchronized to the welding current signal such that the plurality of the magnetic current pulses are synchronized with respect to the plurality of current pulses of the welding signal.
The above and/or other aspects of the invention will be more apparent by describing in detail exemplary embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described below by reference to the attached Figures. The described exemplary embodiments are intended to assist the understanding of the invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way. Like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
As is understood by those in the art, a GMAW-type welding operation uses a pulsed welding waveform to create a welding arc 115 and melt a portion of a welding electrode 113. During a pulse of the waveform a molten droplet 117 of the electrode 115 is transferred from the electrode—through the arc 115—and into a weld puddle. Typically, the molten droplet 117 is transferred during a peak in the welding current pulse. Because such a welding operation is so well known, it will not be discussed in detail herein. It is understood that GMAW-type welding or pulse welding, as referenced herein, refers to any welding in which a pulsed welding waveform is used, including but not limited to GMAW, MIG, FCAW, MCAW type welding.
It is noted that for purposes of clarity and efficiency many of the discussions herein reference GMAW type welding, as shown in the Figures. However, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to use with GMAW type welding systems. Specifically, embodiments of the present invention can also be used with TIG/GTAW (gas tungsten arc welding) systems without departing from the scope and spirit of the present application. Similar to the discussions herein, the magnetic field is used to control the movement of the TIG arc during welding. It is known that in TIG/GTAW welding the electrode used to create the arc is not the consumable (as in GMAW processes), and in embodiments of the invention the magnetic field controls the movement of this arc. Therefore, while many of the discussions and figures herein reference and depict GMAW systems and processes, this is intended to be exemplary and not to limit embodiments of the present invention to GMAW type processes. For example, in each of
Returning to
In embodiments of the present invention the probe 107 is positioned proximate to the welding arc 115 such that the magnetic field 109 can influence the arc 115 and the droplet 117 while the droplet 117 is in flight. Embodiments of the present invention synchronize the generation of the magnetic field 109 and the pulse welding waveform so that an optimized welding operation can be achieved. By synchronizing the generation of the magnetic field 109 with the arc 115 and droplet transfer an optimized welding operation can be achieved, particularly when trying to obtain specialized weld joints. This synchronization will be discussed in detail below.
As shown in
As also shown in
In another exemplary embodiment, the steering current can be 180 degrees out-of-phase with the arc welding current. In such embodiments, the magnetic field 109 is not used to move the droplet 117 during flight, but is used to control the weld puddle, to elongate the weld puddle, or pre-clean the work piece surface. For example, the magnetic device 105 and probe 107 can be positioned either in front of, or behind, (in the travel direction) of the tip 111. In such an embodiment, the magnetic field 109 can move the arc forward or behind as needed to elongate the weld puddle. For example, the arc can be deflected (without a droplet in the arc) forward so that the heat of the arc removes any coatings or surface contaminants before the droplet 117 is passed to the weld puddle. Similarly, the arc can be deflected backwards so that the weld puddle is elongated for a desirable cooling or solidification profile.
In further exemplary embodiments of the present invention, the steering current either begins or reaches its peak after the droplet 117 has contacted the weld puddle and before the following droplet 117 has been released. In additional exemplary embodiments the steering current pulse is started at the same time or after, the welding current reaches a background level. Further, the steering current pulse can be turned off or reach a background level prior to the next welding current pulse beginning.
In the system shown, the magnetic field power supply 103 has a switching circuit 301 which switches the magnetic steering current to the different magnetic devices 105/305 such that the appropriate magnetic field is energized. For example, the switching circuit 301 can be controlled such that the steering current is alternated between each device 105/305 for every welding current pulse. Of course, in other embodiments the switching circuit 301 can be controlled such that the steering current is directed to one device 105 for a set duration of time, or for a number N of welding current pulses. For example, the switch 301 can direct the steering current to the device 105 for 10 welding current pulses, and then to the device 305 for the following 10 pulses, etc. The switching circuit 301 can be controlled via various means. For example, the magnetic steering power supply 103 can be coupled to the welding power supply 101 such that the timing or control signals used to control the welding arc waveform can be used to also control the magnetic field power supply 301. In some embodiments the welding waveform timing circuits can be used to control the switch 301.
In such a tandem arc welding configuration, it is known that the welding arc current pulses of the leading and trailing waveforms are alternated so that the arcs and droplet transfer from the respective torches 702/704 do not interfere with each other. However, it is also known that in such welding configurations arc interference can often occur between the leading and trailing arcs such that arc blow, and similar problems, can occur. To mitigate this, embodiments of the present invention employ the magnetic device 708 to generate a magnetic field 711 between the respective welding pulses of the leading and trailing welding operations.
This is depicted in
In other exemplary embodiments of the system 700, the system controller 705 can use feedback from the welding operation, which may include feedback from the welding power supplies 701/703, to turn on and/or off the device 708. For example, in some welding operations it may not be necessary to have a magnetic field generated between each alternating weld pulse. However, the controller 705 determines when an arc blow condition, or arc stability condition, is present during welding and using this feedback activates the magnetic field power supply 707 to utilize the magnetic field 711 to regain stability of the welding operation. For example, the system controller can use current feedback information from either one, or both, of the lead and trailing welding power supplies to determine the need for the magnetic field 711 for stabilization. Further, the welding state logic in either one, or both, of the power supplies can react to arc instability and can cause the magnetic field to be enabled and/or changed based on the detected instabilities.
As shown in
During welding the torch 111 is translated with respect to the weld joint so that the filler wire 113 is moved across the weld joint. The system controller 901 uses the positional information of the torch 111 with respect to the weld joint to control the output of the magnetic field power supply 103 and/or the welding power supply 101. That is, the output of the power supplies 101/103 can vary based on the position of the torch with respect to the weld joint. Specifically, based on the lateral position of the torch 111 with respect to the joint the output current of the magnetic field power supply 103 can vary to create a magnetic field with a variable strength based on welding position.
An example of such an output is shown in
Following the first pulse 1, at a second lateral position a second welding pulse 2 is provided. At this position the same left magnetic device 909 is used but creates a magnetic field with a different magnitude because the steering current is at a different level B. In the embodiment shown, this can be a situation where the second pulse 2 takes place at a lateral position closer to the center of the weld joint than the first pulse 1. Thus, as the torch moves closer to the center of the joint, the magnetic field strength decreases to place the droplet at the desired position. Of course, in other embodiments the magnetic field can be stronger as the torch moves closer to the center of the joint. At the third welding pulse 3 the torch 111 is positioned at the center of the joint and at this position there is no magnetic field generated by either of the devices 907/909 thus allowing the droplet to be placed at the center of the joint. Then as the torch 111 moves to the right of the joint the right-hand device 907 will generate a magnetic field at pulses 4 and 5 (two different positions) and as discussed above the magnetic field strength will vary based on the position. Thus, embodiments of the present invention can control the strength and orientation of the magnetic fields used to steer the welding arc based on the relative position of the welding torch 111 with respect to the weld joint. Further, as described above, the steering waveform can be AC or can have opposite polarity portions which are used to control the droplet flight during welding. For example, in some exemplary embodiments the steering waveform may not be a constant AC waveform, but can use opposite polarity current portions to control the flight of the droplet or the arc when certain events, such as a short circuit, are detected. Thus, in some embodiments the magnetic field current can have an opposite polarity for each following pulse, or a series of pulses can be provided at a first polarity (direction) followed by a series of pulses having an opposite polarity (direction). Exemplary embodiments of this control methodology will be discussed in more detail below.
Turning now to
As shown in
Various methods of control will now be discussed. The following discussion of exemplary embodiments is intended to be representative as other methods of control can also be employed without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Exemplary embodiments of the present invention can use various methods of controlling and/or synchronizing the generation of the magnetic field to steer the arc and/or control the flight of a molten droplet passing through the arc. Some exemplary methods can use synchronization between the welding waveform and the magnetic field current, while others can use the real time detection of events occurring during the welding operation, each of which will be discussed below. It is noted that because the construction and operation of control signal circuitry, timing circuitry, short circuit detection circuitry, welding feedback circuitry and control are generally known, for the control of current signals in welding power supplies, a detailed discussion of these circuits will not be provided herein. However, these similar circuits and control methodologies can be implemented in the system controllers and/or magnetic field power supplies discussed herein to control the generation of magnetic steering current, as described below.
In a first exemplary embodiment, the magnetic field power supply (e.g., 103) can be energized at the same time as the welding power supply (e.g., 101) using the same or similar control signals used by the welding power supply. For example, when a signal is generated by the welding power supply 101 to generate a welding pulse, that signal is shared with the magnetic field power supply which simultaneously causes a magnetic field current to be supplied to the magnetic device 105. In such an embodiment an on/off signal can be generated to control the magnetic steering current. Thus, the generation of the magnetic field will be in phase with the welding pulses. In other embodiments (as discussed above) it may be desirable to have the magnetic field generation out-of-phase with the welding pulses. In such embodiments the magnetic field power supply 103 and/or the welding power supply 101 can have a timing circuit which delays the creation of magnetic steering current (and thus magnetic field) by a time T after a welding pulse is generated. For example, in some exemplary embodiments the magnetic steering current can be delayed by 5 to 20 ms after the beginning of the welding pulse. Of course, other embodiments may use different timing delays.
In other exemplary embodiments, as explained above, the control circuitry in the welding power supplies generates a magnetic field current prior to the generation of a welding pulse by a time T. Again, timing circuitry can be employed in any of the welding power supply, magnetic field power supply and system controller to ensure the proper timing of the magnetic field relative to the welding pulse.
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a shared state table based waveform control system can be used. The use of state table controls for welding waveforms are generally known, for example the Power Wave® welding power supply, manufactured by The Lincoln Electric Company of Cleveland, Ohio, uses such a control methodology. In an exemplary embodiment, the control and synchronization of the magnetic field current signal is integrated into the welding waveform state table such that the state table controls the operation of both the welding power supply and the magnetic field power supply. For example, when real time welding feedback is received by the welding power supply, including for example, arc voltage, arc current, arc power, output voltage, output current, wire feed speed, etc., the common state table provides operating instructions to both the welding power supply and the magnetic field power supply based on the real time feedback.
In a further exemplary embodiment, a parallel state table is created for the operation of the magnetic field power supply 103 such that a welding state table controls the operation of the welding power supply 101 while a parallel magnetic field state table controls the operation of the magnetic field power supply 103. As described above, in such an embodiment, the magnetic field power supply 103 can share the welding feedback and control signals from the welding operation, such as arc current, arc voltage, arc power, output voltage, output current, wire feed speed, output power, etc. Based on this real time feedback information the parallel state table for the magnetic field power supply 103 determines an appropriate magnetic field intensity, phase, frequency, timing, peak duration, etc. of the magnetic field current signal and the magnetic field power supply 103 generates the appropriate magnetic field current.
In further exemplary embodiments, the parallel state table can take into account the lateral positioning of the welding torch 111 during the welding operation in determining the appropriate parameters for the magnetic field current signal or magnetic field. As stated above, embodiments of the present invention can vary the magnetic field based on the movement of the torch with respect to the weld joint. Thus the control state table of the magnetic field power supply 103 can also take into account the positioning of the welding torch 111 during welding. That is, the control state table of the magnetic field power supply can take into account the x, y and z coordinates of the welding torch, with respect to the work piece, to determine the desired magnetic field intensity, duration, frequency and phase.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the control state table for the magnetic field power supply contains control parameters which are triggered when a short circuit is detected. In such embodiments, when a short circuit is detected by the welding power supply 101 this feedback is also provided to magnetic field power supply 103. Based on the detected short the magnetic field power supply 103 provides a magnetic field current to a magnetic field device (e.g., 105) to aid in clearing the short. For example, in exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a control state table for the magnetic field power supply 103 receives feedback on the detection of a short circuit from the welding power supply 101 (or similar parallel feedback circuitry) and determines the intensity, duration and timing of a magnetic field based on that detected short. That magnetic field current is then provided to the appropriate magnetic steering device to aid in clearing the short. If there are multiple magnetic field generation devices, the state table can also determine which device should be energized. Furthermore, the state table can also take into account the positioning of the welding torch 111 at the time of the short circuit to determine the appropriate magnetic field parameters.
The exemplary embodiments of the welding system, as shown in the Figures, depicts the welding power supply, magnetic field power supply and system controller as separate components. However, this need not be the case as these components can be integrated into a single unit. Furthermore, the control hardware and software (for example a control state table) for the magnetic field can be found in any one of a welding power supply, system controller and/or a magnetic field power supply. Embodiments of the present invention are not limited in this regard, and can have a modular construction as well, where the components of the system are provided in separate but combinable modules.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, the invention is not limited to these embodiments. It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1740381 | Weed | Dec 1929 | A |
1792243 | Richter | Feb 1931 | A |
1854536 | Wilson | Apr 1932 | A |
2743342 | Bettis et al. | Apr 1956 | A |
2756311 | Persson et al. | Jul 1956 | A |
2844705 | Bowman et al. | Jul 1958 | A |
2920183 | Greene | Jan 1960 | A |
2994763 | Schultz | Aug 1961 | A |
3102946 | Zygmunt | Sep 1963 | A |
3174027 | Manz | Mar 1965 | A |
3433924 | Sevenco | Mar 1969 | A |
3551637 | Lampson | Dec 1970 | A |
3626145 | Jackson | Dec 1971 | A |
3727822 | Umbaugh | Apr 1973 | A |
3885123 | Sciaky et al. | May 1975 | A |
4019016 | Friedman et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4048436 | Hiratake et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4095085 | Tomita et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4194106 | Rudaz et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4280137 | Ashida et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4301355 | Kimbrough et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4366362 | Ohta et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4408114 | Nakata et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4485292 | Mizuno et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4491718 | Cook et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4595820 | Richardson | Jun 1986 | A |
4628182 | Hori et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4791270 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4904843 | Hori et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4975558 | Lukens et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5171966 | Fukuoka et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5278390 | Blankenship | Jan 1994 | A |
5932121 | Manabe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6207927 | Mita et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6310320 | Kraus et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331694 | Blankenship | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337455 | Yamaguchi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6617547 | Abdurachmanov | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621049 | Suzuki | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6657163 | Blankenship et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7307240 | Holverson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7378612 | Takahashi et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7842904 | Nakata et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20030024916 | Wright et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040118826 | Schmitt | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050269306 | Fulmer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070056942 | Daniel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070158324 | O'Donnell | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070210048 | Koshiishi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241087 | Peters | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080011727 | Peters | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080053978 | Peters et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080156782 | Rice et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080206594 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080230528 | Wilhelm | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090242533 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100096373 | Hillen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100096375 | Daniel | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100200553 | Yamazaki et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100213179 | Peters | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100230389 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110132877 | Miller et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174784 | Kamei | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110259853 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130043219 | Peters et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130112675 | Peters | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125685 | Miller et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130228555 | Peters et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140001166 | Peters et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140083987 | Dodge | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101032778 | Sep 2007 | CN |
102186618 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102007017225 | Sep 2008 | DE |
1286444 | Aug 1972 | GB |
2154028 | Aug 1985 | GB |
57-39077 | Mar 1982 | JP |
58-205680 | Nov 1983 | JP |
59-87981 | May 1984 | JP |
63-192562 | Aug 1988 | JP |
2-59179 | Feb 1990 | JP |
10-193116 | Jul 1998 | JP |
11-291038 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2011098375 | May 2011 | JP |
538842 | Dec 1976 | SU |
1637971 | Mar 1991 | SU |
WO 2013150364 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/792,416, filed Mar. 11, 2013, Auto Steering in a Weld Joint. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,485, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Tandem Hot-Wire Systems. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,179, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Tandem Hot-Wire Systems. |
Henon, Barbara K. et al., “Automated Narrow Gap GTAW—Driving Down the Cost of Energy,” Arc Machines, Inc., 3 pages, prior to Jun. 27, 2012. |
International Application No. PCT/IB2013/001365, International Search Report & Written Opinion, 11 pages, dated Dec. 17, 2013. |
International Application No. PCT/IB2013/001384, International Search Report & Written Opinion, 9 pages, dated Nov. 26, 2013. |
International Application No. PCT/IB2013/000583, International Search Report & Written Opinion, 9 pages, dated Sep. 20, 2013. |
International Application No. PCT/IB2014/000283, International Search Report, 5 pages, dated Sep. 4, 2014. |
International Application No. PCT/IB2014/000376, International Search Report & Written Opinion, 9 pages, dated Sep. 24, 2014. |
International Application No. PCT/IB2014/000383, International Search Report & Written Opinion, 9 pages, dated Sep. 24, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130256288 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |