The invention pertains to wireless communications systems. More particularly, the invention pertains to such systems which also minimize energy requirements between synchronization signals.
Electrical units which can communicate wirelessly can often be readily installed in circumstances where it is either inconvenient or undesirable to install a wired network. In other circumstances, it is useful and convenient to use both wired and wireless devices in the same system, depending on specific needs.
Wireless devices are found, for example, in the form of wireless hazardous condition detectors such as smoke detectors, fire detectors, flame detectors, thermal detectors, or gas detectors. Still other wireless units have been implemented in the form of condition detectors, such as position detectors, motion detectors, passive infrared detectors and the like. Other types of wireless electrical units implement a desired function, such as opening or closing doors, locking or unlocking doors, controlling motors, controlling relays, solenoids or the like, all without limitation.
One of the known problems associated with using wireless electrical units has been the power consumed during normal operation of the device. Where the wireless unit can be coupled to an exterior source of energy, such as utility supplied power, electrical energy requirements to operate the respective unit or units can be readily met. In other types of installations where the units must be battery powered, energy consumption can become a serious limitation.
One of the reasons that energy consumption in known units is problematic is that the wireless receiver in the respective device must be continuously “on”, and drawing electrical power so that incoming signals can be received and sensed at the unit.
Fire detectors that use RF communication methods have typically incorporated transmitters only due to the reduction of battery life that results when receivers are implemented in the detectors. The receivers are generally ON all the time because they are asynchronous to the other devices in the system.
There is a continuing, on-going need for wireless electrical units with reduced or minimal current requirements. Preferably, such units could be implemented to carry out the known types of functions associated with such units while at the same time, reducing unit energy requirements. Preferably, such units would be installable in both new and existing systems.
While this invention is susceptible of an embodiment in many different forms, there are shown in the drawing and will be described herein in detail specific embodiments thereof with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principals of the invention. It is not intended to limit the invention to the specific illustrated embodiments.
A method that embodies the invention uses both transmitters and receivers in detectors and still maintains a long battery life by synchronizing the detector as described below.
In one embodiment of this invention, a master device provides synchronization signals for other devices in the wireless system. This master device may be linked to other, wired parts of the system or to other timers for the purpose of establishing the synchronization signals.
The master device transmits a periodic synchronization signal. The other devices will adjust their individual ON/OFF, active/inactive, times to match the expected synchronizing signal.
In a system in accordance with the invention, the devices learn the timing of a periodic synchronization signal and then go to a “sleep or OFF” state between synchronizing signals. For example, a synchronization signal could have a period of 10 seconds. All devices that have learned the 10 second period, go to a “wake or ON” state just prior to the expected arrival of the next synchronization signal.
In an exemplary embodiment, all devices have their receivers turned ON and receive incoming signals evaluating the content of information in the signal and responding appropriately. If the signal is requesting information (alarm, trouble, output state, etc.) to be transmitted by some or all of the devices, then the appropriate devices will respond as programmed to activate their transmitters and transmit such information which is then received by some or all devices in the system.
The advantages of such synchronization include 1) the devices can operate both transmitters and receivers while maintaining a long battery life, 2) the devices can parallel process information regarding system conditions (alarms, troubles, output states, input states, etc.) from other devices, 3) there are no communication collisions that corrupt data or interfere with communication, and 4) the devices can be programmed or have their programs changed through a wireless link.
The devices can include smoke, gas, temperature, light, beam, etc. types of detectors. Other devices could include control units of various types such as horns sounders, alarm indicating lights, motion controls, relay or solenoid control units and the like without limitation.
Wireless transmission can be effected using RF frequencies, sonic, ultrasonic, optical frequencies such as infrared or higher frequencies all without limitation. Modulation type is not a limitation of the invention, nor are the nature and character of the synchronization signals. Exemplary types of modulation include spread spectrum, multiple frequencies, FM modulation, AM modulation, or ON/OFF keying.
Different communication configurations of a system can be used without limitation. In a preferred system, the devices have their receiver and transmitters tuned to the same frequencies (can be spread spectrum). This means that the devices will receive any signals that are transmitted on that frequency including their own transmissions. Alternately reception and transmission can be at different frequencies.
The devices are programmed to become active just before the expected time of arrival of the synchronization signal and to stay active until it is received. The respective device(s) will then prepare to transmit their information to transmit based upon the information in the synchronization signal and/or their states or conditions. All devices incorporate a high accuracy internal clock and have a synchronized internal time base. At a specific preset time, they will begin their transmissions.
For a new device that is installed in the respective system or if a device does not properly establish the timing for the synchronization signal, the respective device will continually maintain its receiver ON until it receives the expected synchronization signal. Then it will establish the timing to go into an active/inactive cycle that matches the synchronization timing. If it later awakens, becomes active and finds no synchronization signal, it will stay ON and wait for a synchronization signal so as to readjust its timing for the active/inactive cycle.
If the controller/sender of the synchronization signal has failed, then another device can take over that role and become the sender of synchronization signals for the system. The selection of the sender can be by preprogramming or by any other method.
In the preprogrammed method, the absence of the synchronization signal for a predetermined period of time will activate the next-in-line controller. In one of many other methods, each device selects a random priority message. All devices in the system arbitrate the priority of this message and select a new device, which becomes the controller/sender of the synchronization signals.
A signal or bit arbitration method can be incorporated to prevent devices from transmitting conflicting digital information. For example, a device uses ON/OFF keying wherein ON is represented by transmitting the frequency and OFF is not transmitting the frequency. The devices all start their messages at the same time and continually monitor their receivers to check that the received signal is the same as their transmitted signal (receiving a 0 bit when transmitting a 0 bit, receiving a 1 bit when transmitting a 1 bit).
Because transmitting a frequency has priority over not transmitting a frequency, the devices monitor their own transmissions as well as the transmissions of the other devices. If they receive a 1 bit when they are trying to send a 0 bit, then they know that another device has a higher priority message than their own message and they stop transmitting until the other message is completed. After the other message is completed, they again try to send their own message that continues to be bit arbitrated with all other messages. Eventually, the message of each device will be completed in order of the priority of the messages in the RF system.
Another method of signal arbitration is to have each device start its respective message with a time duration priority signal that is compared by that device with all other devices in the system. The longer the time duration, of the priority signal, the higher the priority of the message. When it is time for the devices to transmit information, each transmits a continuous signal with a time length preprogrammed according to the priority.
Each device is monitoring its own receiver which receives both its own transmissions and the transmissions of all other devices. A device stops sending its priority signal and the receiver is still receiving a priority signal from another device, then that device knows that another device has a higher priority and will wait until the other device completes its message before retrying to send its own message.
The restart of the next message time is referenced to the end of the previous message so all remaining devices that need to transmit information remain coordinated and synchronized. This arbitration can use a single signal or a series of signals to establish this priority without departing from the spirit and scope of this arbitration method. Other arbitration methods, without limitation, can be used with the devices to prevent the collision of messages within this synchronized system.
The members of the plurality 14 are in wireless communication with one another as described in more detail subsequently. Each of the members of the plurality 14 incorporates, for example, and RF antenna 16-1 . . . 16-w which is coupled to a transceiver in the respective unit, best seen in
Unit 12 can be a stand alone unit or, can be incorporated into and part of more extensive alarm control circuitry 20. Circuitry 20 can be in communication with a plurality of ambient condition detectors/control units 22, all without limitation. Neither the details nor the number of the detectors/control units 22 are limitations of the present invention.
Relative to synchronizing/control circuit 12, it will be understood that synchronizing transmissions therefrom can be on the same or a different frequency or frequency band than the devices 14 receive and transmit on.
The control circuitry 32 can in turn receive signals from an optional ambient condition sensor or sensors 34a or other input devices. Alternately or in addition thereto, control circuitry 34 can communicate with optional output circuitry 34b which could include relays, solenoids, sounders, lights, enunciators, strobes or the like, all without limitation.
The unit 14-i receives electrical energy from an internal source 36. Source 36 can be implemented as a self-contained battery where the unit 14-i is carried within housing 38 and is mountable to a selected surface as appropriate for its function or functions as would be understood by those of skill in the art. Alternately, energy source 36 can be coupled to an exterior source of energy, such as utility supplied power if desired.
As described above, and relative to
In time period B, the device 14-n wakes up just prior to the synchronization signal and determines that neither it nor any other detector have state conditions for it to respond. Time period B will be representative of the vast majority of times since state conditions in the devices change very infrequently.
During time period B, the receiver of each device is ON for only a little longer than 2 milliseconds every 10 seconds, yielding an average power consumption RECEIVER-ON/5,000. If the RECEIVER-ON current draw is 5 mA, then the average current draw related to the receiver would be 1 micro-amp.
In time period C, the devices 14 become active just prior to the expected arrival of the synchronization signals and various detectors determine that they have state conditions for multiple device responses. In this case, device 14-n has the highest priority and transmits first, followed by the other devices arbitrating to their transmission times.
While any device is transmitting, all the devices keep their receivers ON to receive any and all messages. This enables all devices to integrate the state conditions of other detectors with their own state to determine the response of the device (sound horn, turn on relay, etc.). For example, if the devices turn on a relay to activate a sprinkler system, they could require that other grouped devices or detectors also have a state condition that matches their own state condition.
For example, in Bit 7 of Byte 1 time slot, devices 1, 2, and 3 are all going to transmit a data=1 bit. Each therefore will make a transmission during the time slot for Bit 7 of Byte 1 but at different random times or different address IDs so they do not overlap in time. In Bit 6 of Byte 1, device 1 is sending data=0 (no transmission) and devices 2 and 3 are transmitting data=1. Device 1 notes that another device transmitted a data=1 that has a higher priority during Bit 6 of Byte 1 time and thus arbitrates itself off the communication until the message by other devices is completed.
The above process continues until only one device is remaining and then that remaining device transmits its message without interference from other devices. Finally, the other devices transmit their message in order with their learned priorities from the arbitration process. Alternately the above process could be carried out without the devices learning their order from the prior message transmitting process.
From the foregoing, it will be observed that numerous variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific apparatus illustrated herein is intended or should be inferred. It is, of course, intended to cover by the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4194153 | Masaki et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4398192 | Moore et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4449248 | Leslie et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4745408 | Nagata et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4916432 | Tice et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4964121 | Moore | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4995099 | Davis | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4996526 | DeLuca | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5027428 | Ishiguro et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5117219 | Tice et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5121407 | Partyka et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5140698 | Toko | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5150361 | Wieczorek et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151693 | Onoe et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5241562 | Partyka et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5251325 | Davis et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5334319 | Tomizawa et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5347515 | Marino | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5386515 | Martin et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5392457 | Davis et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5463763 | Kubo | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5509136 | Korekata et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5539725 | Trubey et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5675736 | Brady et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5812767 | Desai et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5832304 | Bauman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5931916 | Barker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5987506 | Carter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6002669 | White | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6032213 | Gulick | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6038639 | O'Brien et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6101499 | Ford et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6185638 | Beardsley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192230 | van Bokhorst et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6243372 | Petch et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6350803 | Huang et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6498563 | Tice et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6513094 | Magro | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6519678 | Basham et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6542962 | Kodama et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553002 | Bremer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6577232 | Hawkinson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6665520 | Romans | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6694149 | Ady et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6707867 | Diepstraten et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6718228 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6724834 | Garrett et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6779077 | Bakke et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6782448 | Goodman et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6816510 | Banerjee | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6879567 | Callaway et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6920485 | Russell | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6944188 | Sinha et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7050409 | O'Scolai et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7072432 | Belcea | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7103344 | Menard | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7155162 | Doi et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7197304 | Chung et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7212512 | Lucas et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7366532 | Khawand et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7539520 | Twitchell, Jr. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 20030185158 | Lucas et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 9950848 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050159152 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |