In the storage or transmission of digital information, the bits or symbols of the user data are actually transmitted or stored via a physical media or mechanism whose responses are essentially analog in nature. The analog write or transmit signal going into the storage/transmission media or channel is typically modulated by channel bits (typically run-length limited or RLL bits) that are an encoded version of the original user-data bits (non-return-to-zero or NRZ bits). The analog read or receive signal coming from the media is demodulated to detect or extract estimated channel bits, which are then decoded into estimated user-data bits. Ideally, the estimated user-data bits would be an identical copy of the original user-data bits. In practice, they can be corrupted by distortion, timing variations, noise and flaws in the media and in the write/transmit and read/receive channels.
The process of demodulating the analog read signal into a stream of estimated user-data bits can be implemented digitally. Digital demodulation in magnetic mass storage systems requires that the analog read signal be sampled at a rate that is on the order of the channel-bit rate. Maximum-likelihood (ML) demodulation is a process of constructing a best estimate of the channel bits that were written based on digitized samples captured from the analog read signal.
It is common to use run-length-limited (RLL) encoding of the original user data bits, which are arbitrary or unconstrained, into an RLL-encoded stream of channel bits. It may be desirable that there be no less than d zeroes between ones; that is, that the media transitions be spaced by at least d+l channel bit times. This constraint can help keep to a manageable level the interference effects among the pulses in the analog read signal. On the other hand, because media transitions provide timing information that must be extracted from the read signal to ensure synchronization of the demodulator with the pulses in the read signal, it may be desirable that there be no more than k zeroes between ones; that is, that there be a media transition at least every k'th channel bit time. An RLL(d,k) code is a code that can encode an arbitrary stream of original user-data bits into a stream of channel bits such that the encoded channel bit stream satisfies these two constraints. An RLL code has a theoretical capacity which limits the number of user bits which can be represented in a given number of RLL bits. The capacity is a function of the d and k constraints with d=0 and k=infinite being the limiting (unconstrained) case with a capacity of exactly one. The capacity of an RLL (1,7) code for example is just slightly greater than ⅔ and is exactly ⅔ for any practical implementation, meaning that every pair of user bits will map to exactly three RLL bits.
In a magnetic disk drive, the surface of the magnetic media is logically divided into concentric rings called tracks. The distance around the track varies as a function of the radius at which the track lies. Since it is desirable to keep the rate of revolution of the disk constant to avoid mechanical delays in accelerating and decelerating the disk, it is necessary to either store an amount of data on each track which is proportional to the length of the track (this requires a different data transfer rate for each track) or to vary the physical transition spacing on the media so that pulses are widely separated at the outside diameter and crowded very close at the inner diameter of the recording surface (this is wasteful of the magnetic media which is only sparsely used at the outer diameter). A practice known as zoned recording is a popular compromise between these two extremes. In zoned recording, a group of tracks (a zone) is established in which every track in the zone holds the same amount of data. Thus each zone requires a different data transfer rate, but the number of data transfer rates which need be supported is reduced (more coarsely quantized). This still leaves a variation in the physical spacing of transitions between the inside and outside diameters of each zone resulting in a variation in pulse shape.
Partial-response signaling has just recently been incorporated into mass storage devices and then in a limited form. One prior-art magnetic disk drive using partial-response signaling only supports PR4 (pulses with the samples of . . . , 0, 1, 1, 0, . . . ). PR4 signaling has only very limited inter-symbol interference evidenced by only two non-zero samples in the pulse. To increase the capacity of the media, the user of a PR4 read channel must increase the equalization of the pulses (slim the pulses) in order to limit the inter-symbol interference of adjacent pulses so that any pulse only affects two read signal samples. The increased equalization also enhances the noise accompanying the signal, making the detection task more difficult and errors more likely. U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,538 by Patel covers a similar situation but with EPR4 signaling and an RLL(1,7) code. This improves the allowed amount of inter-symbol interference, increasing it to three non-zero samples of ( . . . , 0, ½, 1, ½, 0, . . . ). Both of these techniques will allow an increase in capacity but are limited in the variety of pulse shapes which can be detected and therefore limited by how much equalization (pulse slimming) may be performed before the effect of equalizing the noise (noise enhancement) becomes intolerable.
Thus, there is a need for a flexible read channel which can accommodate a wide variety of pulse shapes as will be seen in each zone. There is also a need to allow larger amounts of controlled inter-symbol interference between pulses (pulses with more than two or three non-zero pulses) in order to continue increasing the capacity of the recording media.
A synchronous read channel having a single chip integrated circuit digital portion which provides digital gain control, timing recovery, equalization, digital peak detection, sequence detection, RLL(1,7) encoding and decoding, error-tolerant synchronization and channel quality measurement is disclosed. The integrated circuit accommodates both center sampling and side sampling, and has a high degree of programmability of various pulse shaping and recovery parameters and the ability to provide decoded data using sequence detection or digital peak detection. These characteristics, together with the error-tolerant sync mark detection and the ability to recover data when the sync mark is obliterated, allow a wide variety of retry and recovery strategies to maximize the possibility of data recovery. Various embodiments, including an embodiment incorporating the analog functions as well as the primary digital functions of the read channel in a single integrated circuit, and preferred embodiments utilizing a reduced complexity, programmable modified Viterbi detector supporting a broad class of partial response channels are disclosed.
The CL-SH4400 is a specific embodiment of the present invention designed to work with a companion analog integrated circuit and a disk controller to form a state of the art high density magnetic disk drive. In that regard, the uniqueness of the present invention, while used in a digital read-write channel, is primarily related to its read capability and versatility.
The companion integrated circuit with which the CL-SH4400 is specifically intended to operate implements a VGA (Variable Gain Amplifier), a tunable analog filter, an analog to digital converter, a timing VFO (Variable Frequency Oscillator), write pre-compensation and servo demodulation functions. Accordingly, in a read operation, the CL-SH4400 does not receive an analog signal but instead receives already digitized read information in the form of digitized analog read channel samples. Further, while the timing Variable Frequency Oscillator and the Variable Gain Amplifier are on the companion integrated circuit and are not part of the present invention, the timing VFO and the Variable Gain Amplifier are each digitally controlled through digital control signals generated in the CL-SH4400. Accordingly, in the specific embodiment to be described, digital control feedback signals for both the VFO and the VGA are generated in the CL-SH4400 even though the control loops for the timing recovery and the automatic gain control functions are actually closed within the companion analog integrated circuit. In that regard, it should be particularly noted that the automatic gain control signal may alternatively be generated on the analog companion integrated circuit, as the same may be readily generated in the analog domain rather than in the digital domain. Accordingly, particularly the generation of the digital gain control to be described as part of the CL-SH4400 is an optional design choice readily relegated to the companion integrated circuit if desired.
In one mode of operation, multiplexer 28 couples the DRDO and DRD1 signals directly to a transition detector 22 which processes the successive samples to detect the presence of transitions in each of the two digitized read data signals. In the preferred embodiment, the transition detector 22 is of the type disclosed in co-pending U.S. application for patent entitled Digital Pulse Detector, filed May 8, 1992 as Ser. No. 07/879,938, the disclosure of which co-pending application is incorporated herein by reference. The output of the transition detector is a low or high level during the respective bit times (delayed as described in the co-pending application) depending upon whether a transition (providing a high level output) or no transition (providing a low level output) was detected. The output of the transition detector 22, the peak detected signal PKDET, in this mode would be coupled to multiplexer 24 and through a sync mark detector 26 to provide a sync byte detected output SBD if a sync byte was in fact detected, and to couple the two bits to the RLL decoder 28 which decodes the bit stream to provide the NRZ data out digital data. In the preferred embodiment run length constraint violations are detected and optionally multiplexed onto the NRZ data out lines. These may be used by an error correcting system within the disk controller. In the preferred embodiment, an error tolerant sync mark detector 26 is used. This detector is designed to achieve a level of error tolerance for the synchronization function equal to that achieved for the data field by the error-correction code implemented in the disk controller. This is achieved in part by employing an error-tolerant Synchronization Mark pattern for minimum cross-correlation with the preamble and for minimum autocorrelation, and by making the number of four-channel-bit groups which must be detected programmable. The synchronization mark recovery procedure may be used to recover data when a severe defect has destroyed the entire synchronization mark. When using this mode, the CL-SH4400 first goes through a normal timing and gain acquisition procedure while counting channel bits. The synchronization mark is assumed to have been detected when the count matches the synchronization mark recovery count. By varying the synchronization mark recount, the microcontroller can vary the assumed starting point of a header or data area until the correct starting point is tried, whereupon the sector will be recovered if there is no other error beyond the capability of the error correction code in the disk controller.
In the CL-SH4400, the NRZ data output is user selectable as a serial bit stream, a 2-bit parallel stream or character wide (8-bit wide) digital data. If the data was randomized prior to storage, the data randomizer 30 may be enabled to de-randomize the data from the RLL decoder 28 before being provided as the NRZ data output.
The output of the transition detector 22 in this mode is also provided to the gain control circuit 32 and the timing recovery circuit 34. Also the N-bit digitized samples DRDO and DRD1 are coupled through multiplexer 20 to the gain control circuit 22 and the timing recovery circuit 34. The gain control circuit 32 is shown in more detail in
The timing recovery circuit 34 in the CL-SH4400 is shown in greater detail in
The timing recovery circuit has two modes of operation, acquisition and tracking. The appropriate range and resolution of the frequency control signal FCTL to the analog companion part is not the same for the two modes. In the acquisition mode, the necessary frequency control range is larger (wider range of possible frequency settings) than in tracking. Conversely, in tracking the required resolution (minimum step of frequency) is finer. To meet these conflicting requirements without unduly increasing the number of bits in the FCTL interface, the resolution and range are made to depend on the mode of operation, and a signal ACQ is used to communicate to the analog companion part which mode of operation is being used. When the operating mode is switched from acquisition to tracking, the last frequency setting during acquisition is stored in the companion analog part and the value on the FCTL bus during tracking is taken as an offset from the stored setting. In the preferred embodiment (CL-SH4400) the range and resolution are decreased by a factor of 8 between acquisition and tracking.
The timing recovery circuit 34 also includes a programmable timing set point. The timing set point permits a wider range of sampling strategies which enables the support of a wider range of pulse shapes. The timing set point is useful on retry in the event of the detection of an uncorrectable error. Also the digital filter includes two coefficients which are independently programmable for acquisition and tracking. These are also usable in a retry strategy to change the bandwidth and hence the response time of the timing loop. Like the individual gain errors GERR, the individual timing errors TERR are also coupled to the channel quality circuit for contribution to the quantitative analysis of the channel quality with respect to timing recovery. One alternate embodiment of the timing recovery block includes a frequency error detector. The frequency error detector is used to decrease the time required for the timing loop to lock to the channel bit frequency and phase during the acquisition period before encountering data.
As variations on the mode of operation just described, the two N-bit digitized read data signals DRDO and DRD1 may be passed through a pulse shaping filter 38 prior to being coupled to multiplexing block 20. The pulse shaping filter provides digital filtering at the cost of a small amount of delay with two user selectable coefficients PC1 and PC2, independently programmable in the filter structure. This pulse shaping filter, of course, is in addition to any filtering done in the analog domain, and is an example of the flexibility and adaptability of the present invention. In particular, the effect of the pulse shaping filter may be eliminated by multiplexing block 20, or alternatively, the pulse shaping filter may be used with coefficients user selected, and thus variable, to provide the best performance of the overall storage system read channel with the flexibility to accommodate changes in pulse shape when changing from one recording zone to another, and to allow coefficient variations as part of overall device parameter variations for systematic retries upon the detection of uncorrectable errors in the subsequent error detection and correction (EDAC) operations. The pulse shaping filter of the preferred embodiment is a finite impulse response digital filter which means that the output is a function of the current and past inputs but not a function of its own past outputs. The delays necessary for the filter to remember the past inputs are shared by delay 36 to provide a separate delay path to multiplexing block 20. The delay path through delay 36 provides an amount of delay equivalent to the delay of pulse shaping filter 38. Multiplexing block 20 is provided to give a maximum of flexibility in modes of usage, by providing a separate source of input for the transition detector and the group of blocks comprising the sequence detector 40 (by way of spectrum smoothing filter 42), the gain control circuitry 32 and the timing recovery circuitry 34. The multiplexing block is designed so that all blocks may operate upon the raw input samples provided by DRDO and DRD1, or alternatively the pulse shaping filter may be placed in one of the multiplexing block's output paths with the delay placed in the other path. The delay is necessary in this case so that the transition detector's outputs are synchronized with the sample values reaching the gain control circuitry and timing recovery circuitry. Finally, the pulse shaping filter may feed both of the multiplexing block's output paths. In general the multiplexing block could be designed so that by programming the multiplexing block each block at the multiplexing block's outputs (transition detector 22, gain control 32, timing recovery 34, and sequence detector 40 by way of spectrum smoothing filter 42) could receive raw input samples, delayed raw input samples, or filtered input samples independent of the data received by the other blocks. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention however, the gain control circuitry and the timing recovery circuitry have the capability of compensating for the pulse shape in an effort to increase the accuracy of the gain and timing recovery loops, and to reduce the amount of circuitry, the gain control circuitry and timing recovery circuitry assume the same pulse shape for which sequence detector 40 is programmed. This basic pulse shape received by the sequence detector is only marginally affected by the addition of the spectrum smoothing filter, which is designed to reduce only the head bumps at the tails of the pulse and does not seriously affect the center of the pulse except to correct for head bumps due to neighboring pulses. In that regard, the present invention includes a channel quality circuit 46 for measuring the quality of the read channel as earlier described. This provides not only quantitative channel evaluation, but in addition allows selection of read channel parameters such as, but not limited to, the coefficients PC1 and PC2 in the pulse shaping filter to best adapt the read channel to the characteristics of the storage medium and the pulse form and characteristics being read therefrom.
The present invention further includes a sequence detector 40 which receives as its input the two N-bit digital read data signals DRDO and DRD1 as may be modified by the pulse shaping filter 38 and as may be additionally modified by the spectrum smoothing filter 42. In that regard, the spectrum smoothing filter 42, as shown in
The pulse shaping filter and the spectrum smoothing filter together form a digital equalizer which can modify the equalization done in the analog filter of the companion integrated circuit, and along with the companion integrated circuit provides support for changing equalization needs from head to head and zone to zone of the magnetic storage device. The parameters for the pulse shaping filter and the spectrum smoothing filter are loaded and/or varied by microcontroller 44 on initialization and during head seeks.
The sequence detector 40 is a partial response sequence detector. This allows the analog response of the read channel to a storage medium transition to overlap with the response to adjacent transitions associated with subsequent information bits. In comparison to most prior art read channels for magnetic storage media, the use of a partial response detector allows higher information storage densities in comparison to the prior art alternative of requiring the medium transitions to be sufficiently spaced from each other so that the read signal responses do not overlap significantly, thereby allowing each transition to be individually detected irrespective of the nearest neighboring transitions.
The particular sequence detector used in the present invention is a uniquely modified form of Viterbi detector which substantially preserves the full performance of the Viterbi algorithm in a substantially reduced complexity sequence detector. The basic Viterbi algorithm is described in the book “Fast Algorithms for Digital Signal Processing” by Richard E. Blahut, 1985, pages 387-399. In accordance with the Viterbi algorithm, a Viterbi detector does not attempt to decide whether a medium transition has occurred immediately upon receipt of the read sample or samples that correspond to that transition. Rather, as samples are taken from the read signal, the Viterbi detector keeps a running tally of the error between the actual sample sequence and the sample sequence that would be expected if the medium had been written with a particular sequence of transitions. Such an error tally is simultaneously kept for several possible transition sequences. As more samples are taken, less likely choices for transition sequences are pruned from consideration. If a set of possible sequences of medium transitions is appropriately constrained, then the location of each medium transition becomes known with a high degree of likelihood within a reasonable time after taking the samples corresponding to that transition. Because of the time delay between a sample acquisition and the determination of whether that sample represented a transition or an absence of a transition, the gain control circuit 32 and the timing recovery circuit 34 are both still referenced to the output of the transition detector 22, which has a more immediate response to the occurrence of a transition. Also, while in general the output of the sequence detector, when used, should be more accurate in ultimately determining whether a transition occurred at a particular bit time, an error in the output of the peak detector will have little effect on gain and timing. Specifically, failure to detect a transition will only slightly delay gain control and timing error corrections, and an isolated false detection of a transition will only slightly perturb the gain control and timing accuracy. This should be more than made up by the increased accuracy of the bit stream detection by the sequence detector's consideration of what comes before and after a particular digitized read data sample.
If the present invention is realized in an embodiment wherein digitized read data is processed a single bit time's worth at a time, a Viterbi detector of a conventional design may be used, or if two or more bit time's worth of samples are to be processed simultaneously, as in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, a conventional Viterbi detector could be modified for that purpose. However, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the uniquely modified form of Viterbi detector used is that disclosed in a co-pending application for patent entitled “Method and Apparatus for Reduced-Complexity Viterbi-type Sequence Detectors” filed Mar. 16, 1992 as Ser. No. 07/852,015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In a typical Viterbi detector implemented using the ADD, COMPARE, SELECT (ACS) method, each state in the expected sample sequence model is associated with a hardware module to perform the functions of adding new branch error metrics to path error metrics, comparing path error metrics, and selecting the path having the lowest path metric. In the sequence detector used in the preferred embodiment in accordance with the co-pending application, an ACS module may have two or more sequence model states dynamically associated with it such that at some times, one sequence model state is associated with it, and at other times, another sequence model is associated with it. This reduces the number of ACS modules required and also reduces the size and complexity of the detector path memories which must store one path for each ACS module. Groups of sequence model states may be chosen to share an ACS module without significant loss in performance as compared to the conventional Viterbi detector. These detectors support a wide range of sample models by making the expected sample sequence of an isolated medium transition programmable through control 44. By way of specific example, the sequence detector used in the CL-SH4400 disclosed herein will support the PR4, EPR4 and EEPR4 sample models, among others. In addition, the alternating polarity of pulses is enforced, as is a minimum run length constraint of d=1.
The d=1 constraint in the RLL(d,k) coding is an important constraint in the present invention, especially for applications where the storage system uses thin-film magnetic media. For thin-film magnetic media, there is an effect known as partial erasure which puts a practical limit on how close two magnetic transitions may be written. The effect is due to a ragged (or zig-zag) boundary between regions of opposite magnetization. As the transitions become too close, the zig-zags begin to overlap and the area of opposite magnetic polarity between two transitions starts to disappear. The result is that as the read head flies over the partially erased transitions, the amplitude of the corresponding read signal pulses is diminished. This is a non-linear, data pattern dependent effect which is difficult to compensate for. The d=1 constraint remedies this situation by preventing magnetic transitions in two consecutive channel bit times. The drawback is that the d=O constrained code may typically represent 8 NRZ bits with 9 RLL bits (rate 8/9) while the d=1 constrained code can only represent 6 NRZ bits with 9 RLL bits (rate ⅔). For example, to store 8 NRZ bits, the d=0 constrained code will store 9 channel bits while the d=1 constrained code will store 12 channel bits in the same amount of space, hence the d=1 channel bit interval is ¾ the size of the d=O channel bit interval. Fortunately, the magnetic transitions have a minimum spacing of 2 channel bits and therefore the minimum distance between two transitions has increased by 3/2 with respect to the corresponding d=0 constrained code. This makes the d=1 constrained read channel a good solution for increasing storage capacity in applications where the minimum transition spacing is close enough for partial erasure effects to be noticeable.
The sequence detector utilized in the CL-SH4400 can be programmed to operate on any channel response which can be well represented by sequences in the form of a, b, 1, c wherein the selection of a, b and c allow the ability to accommodate pulse asymmetry which might otherwise require that the read signal pass through an analog or digital phase equalizer prior to entering the sequence detector. The levels a, b and c also give the ability to select between center and side sampling. Center-sampled pulses are notably those for which the sample levels a, b, 1, and c are selected such that 1 is very near the peak of the pulse, b and c are roughly halfway down their respective sides of the pulse, and a is near zero, for example, the sample levels 0, ½, 1 and ½. Side-sampled pulses are notably those for which the sample levels are selected such that 1 and b (which is about 1) straddle the peak of the pulse, for example the sample levels 5/16, 1, 1 and 5/16. This choice of side versus center sampling also affects the manner in which gain error and phase error are calculated in the gain control loop and timing recovery loop. The option to choose between side and center sampling allows the user a wider range of possible trade-offs between the amount of equalization (filtering) used to shape the raw pulse shape into the target pulse shape of the sequence detector and the amount of noise enhancement which arises as a consequence of shaping the raw pulse. Hence the read channel can be more suitably matched to the storage medium to provide better performance.
The state machine model 700 for the partial response sequence detector 40 is shown in
Referring again to
When not writing, the serial enable signal SER_ENA may be asserted, at which time multiplexers 50 and 52 are switched so that serial control address and data may be transferred on the SER_DAT line to the companion integrated circuit synchronous with the associated serial clock signal SER_CLK as the output signals of the two multiplexers 50 and 52. Multiplexing of these two chip pins of the single chip CL-SH4400 integrated circuit helps reduce the pin count without loss of performance or flexibility. This serial interface is provided to eliminate the need for the companion integrated circuit to interface with the bus of the microprocessor and eliminates a potential coupling between the noisy microprocessor bus and in the sensitive analog circuitry of the read channel in the companion integrated circuit. This also provides a benefit in pin count since the microprocessor bus interface would require numerous additional pins on the companion integrated circuit. Each of the control registers of the companion integrated circuit are mapped to corresponding register addresses in the integrated circuit of the present invention, when one of these registers is written to, the serial interface initiates a serial transfer write operation, sending the data to the appropriate register in the companion integrated circuit. The preferred embodiment of the present invention includes two modes, one in which a status bit which can be read to determine whether or not the serial transfer write operation is complete and another in which the integrated circuit of the preferred embodiment forces the microprocessor to pause while the serial transfer write operation is in progress. Similarly, a read of a register in the companion integrated circuit is performed by reading the corresponding register in the integrated circuit of the present invention. This initiates a serial transfer read operation. In the first of two serial interface read modes, the integrated circuit of the preferred embodiment will signal the microprocessor to pause until the serial transfer read operation is complete at which time the serially transferred data will be accessible at the pins of the integrated circuit of the present invention. In a second mode, the integrated circuit of the preferred embodiment will return the data left over from the previous serial transfer read operation, and once the current read operation is completed, it will initiate a new serial interface read operation with the address just supplied. The preferred embodiment includes a status bit which can be read to determine whether or not the new serial transfer read operation is complete. Once complete, the microprocessor may initiate a second read operation to retrieve the data originally desired and to initiate another serial transfer read operation at a new address for future use if desired. Summarizing the two modes, in one mode the microprocessor is made to wait, in the second mode the microprocessor must read the register twice, once to supply the register address and second time to retrieve the data and possibly supply the next register address.
In the embodiments hereinbefore described, numerous parameters were described as being programmable, and as such, as being useful for varying on retries in the event of the detection or repeated detection of an uncorrectable error. Obviously additional programmable or fixed parameters may also be incorporated, such as by way of example, additional filter coefficients in the pulse shaping and other filters. It should be noted that particularly certain parameters, such as the parameters of the pulse shaping filter 38 and the spectrum smoothing filter 42, may be made adaptive, or a combination of adaptive and programmable. By way of example, coefficients may be made adaptive, while the time constants of the adaptive characteristics and perhaps offsets, wave shapes, asymmetries and compensation for nonlinearities are made programmable. In that regard, it should be noted that given an uncorrectable or repeated uncorrectable error, there is no harm in further attempts at a successful read with different parameters, side versus center sampling, filtering versus different, less or no filtering, etc. Further, normally one would use the sequence detector on read for its superior detection capabilities over a peak detector. However in the case of hard errors wherein the errors in the output of the sequence detector exceed the error correction capability of the EDAC code used, a further retry strategy may include switching to an output derived from the peak detector, as previously described, rather than the sequence detector. This will add noise errors characteristic of transition detection effectively within the single bit-time of the possible transition, but will eliminate whatever additional propagation of the hard errors (for example media defects) may be caused by the sequence detector. The effect of the noise errors may be substantially eliminated by multiple reads, followed by a majority vote to cancel all or most of the effect of the noise errors, yielding an opportunity for a successful error correction when the same could not be achieved with the sequence detector in the path. Here again, pulse shaping filter characteristics may be varied and multiple retries of the peak detector multiple reads executed, as reasonable exhaustion of all opportunity for a successful read is better than a fatal error.
There have been disclosed and described herein preferred and alternate embodiments of a new and unique synchronous read channel which include a sequence detector with a flexible architecture capable of implementing a broad range of partial response polynomials. While an embodiment of the present invention which supports only one or two partial response channels would be highly useful, the detector used in the preferred embodiment of the present invention supports a broad class of partial response channels, including but not limited to PR4 (1,7), EPR4 (1,7) and EEPR (1,7). While the sequence detector is normally operative upon a read, the output of a digital peak detector may be enabled as the output of the read channel if desired. These and other inventive features of the invention will be apparent from the preceding description.
Thus while a preferred and alternate embodiments of the present invention has been disclosed and described in detail herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.
This application is a CONTINUATION of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/028,871, filed Dec. 21, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,379,452 which is a DIVISIONAL of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/838,113, filed Apr. 16, 1997 (now abandoned), which is a DIVISIONAL of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/210,302, filed Mar. 16, 1994 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,334), which is a CONTINUATION of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/012,266, filed Feb. 1, 1993 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,424,881). The contents of each of the aforementioned patent applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4053944 | Dixon | Oct 1977 | A |
4072914 | Haramoto et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4077021 | Csajka et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4081756 | Price et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4101942 | Jacques | Jul 1978 | A |
4103314 | Case | Jul 1978 | A |
4115768 | Eggenberger et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4118791 | Swain | Oct 1978 | A |
4123710 | Stuart et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4130818 | Snyder, Jr. | Dec 1978 | A |
4177430 | Paul | Dec 1979 | A |
4188646 | Sordello et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4206440 | Doi et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4209809 | Chang et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4251882 | Pfefferkorn | Feb 1981 | A |
4262313 | Mouri | Apr 1981 | A |
4279005 | Kitamura et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4298956 | Rathbun et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4337458 | Cohn et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4338683 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4345280 | Blagaila et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4363007 | Ichihara et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4370748 | Janc et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4371901 | Shah | Feb 1983 | A |
4373152 | Jacobsthal | Feb 1983 | A |
4387461 | Evans | Jun 1983 | A |
4394695 | Mahon | Jul 1983 | A |
4399474 | Coleman, Jr. | Aug 1983 | A |
4413251 | Adler et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4416017 | Jasper et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4420771 | Derivi et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4447903 | Sewerinson | May 1984 | A |
4447908 | Chevillat et al. | May 1984 | A |
4463344 | Adler et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4464714 | Huijser et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4468786 | Davis | Aug 1984 | A |
4472813 | Koike et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4480274 | Coleman, Jr. | Oct 1984 | A |
4483012 | Wei | Nov 1984 | A |
4484176 | Fitzpatrick | Nov 1984 | A |
4488142 | Franaszek | Dec 1984 | A |
4488189 | Axmear et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4495529 | Gustafson | Jan 1985 | A |
4500982 | Yoshida | Feb 1985 | A |
4501000 | Immink et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4504872 | Petersen | Mar 1985 | A |
4517610 | Minuhin | May 1985 | A |
4519077 | Amin | May 1985 | A |
4528565 | Hauptmann | Jul 1985 | A |
4530019 | Penniman | Jul 1985 | A |
4532604 | Baker | Jul 1985 | A |
4547890 | Gindi | Oct 1985 | A |
4549232 | Axmear et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4551773 | Cohn et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4554598 | Tarbox et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4564815 | Naito | Jan 1986 | A |
4566044 | Langdon, Jr. et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4571575 | McCullough | Feb 1986 | A |
4571731 | Klinkovsky et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4571734 | Dolivo et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4578721 | Brannan, Jr. | Mar 1986 | A |
4580176 | Graves et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4593375 | Gershenson | Jun 1986 | A |
4595959 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4606028 | Wagenmakers | Aug 1986 | A |
4609907 | Adler et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4612586 | Sordello et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4622599 | Norton, Jr. | Nov 1986 | A |
4624564 | Dahlgren | Nov 1986 | A |
4627094 | Scholz | Dec 1986 | A |
4628269 | Hunninghaus et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4631606 | Sugaya | Dec 1986 | A |
4635142 | Haugland | Jan 1987 | A |
4644545 | Gershenson | Feb 1987 | A |
4647874 | Rittenbach | Mar 1987 | A |
4651237 | Williams | Mar 1987 | A |
4660106 | Harrison et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4669004 | Moon et al. | May 1987 | A |
4672597 | Yamazaki | Jun 1987 | A |
4673891 | Remy | Jun 1987 | A |
4675650 | Coppersmith et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4675652 | Machado | Jun 1987 | A |
4691254 | Cloke | Sep 1987 | A |
4694451 | Adams et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697167 | O'Keefee et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4707681 | Eggenberger et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4719523 | Kutaragi | Jan 1988 | A |
4724496 | White | Feb 1988 | A |
4728929 | Tanaka | Mar 1988 | A |
4736433 | Dolby | Apr 1988 | A |
4737869 | Sugaya et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4740944 | Verboom | Apr 1988 | A |
4740968 | Aichelmann, Jr. | Apr 1988 | A |
4746991 | Efron et al. | May 1988 | A |
4750058 | Hirt et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4752841 | Syracuse et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4757406 | Stewart et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4759065 | Field et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763328 | Shimoda et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4777544 | Brown et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4777636 | Yamashita et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4779072 | Van Gestel | Oct 1988 | A |
4786890 | Marcus et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4788507 | Berkowitz et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4788694 | Calderbank | Nov 1988 | A |
4789994 | Randall et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4792915 | Adams et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4792952 | Weston | Dec 1988 | A |
4792977 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4799112 | Bremmer et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4802009 | Hartmeier | Jan 1989 | A |
4805174 | Kubota et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4805190 | Jaffre et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4809338 | House | Feb 1989 | A |
4811346 | Battail | Mar 1989 | A |
4814907 | Goor | Mar 1989 | A |
4815068 | Dolby et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4819103 | Okamura | Apr 1989 | A |
4819153 | Graham et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4821125 | Christensen et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4821288 | Peile | Apr 1989 | A |
4821289 | Peile | Apr 1989 | A |
4823346 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4823361 | Yoshida | Apr 1989 | A |
4829270 | Anderson et al. | May 1989 | A |
4833470 | Iketani | May 1989 | A |
4841299 | Weaver | Jun 1989 | A |
4841389 | Hoyt et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4843502 | Tagawa | Jun 1989 | A |
4845711 | LeFort et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4847871 | Matsushita et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4849997 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4852102 | Yamaguchi | Jul 1989 | A |
4853802 | Kukson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4853810 | Pohl et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4853915 | Takasago et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4864572 | Rechen et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4866533 | Nagashima | Sep 1989 | A |
4866544 | Hashimoto | Sep 1989 | A |
4866736 | Bergmans | Sep 1989 | A |
4868689 | Egami et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868690 | Minuhin et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4870414 | Karabed et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4870657 | Bergmans et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872073 | Fincher et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4873701 | Tretter | Oct 1989 | A |
4884074 | Nourry et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4885757 | Provence | Dec 1989 | A |
4888699 | Knoll et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4888775 | Karabed et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4888779 | Karabed et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4890299 | Dolivo et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4905254 | Bergmans | Feb 1990 | A |
4907100 | Nishiyama et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4907181 | Hedtke et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4907217 | Leveque | Mar 1990 | A |
4908722 | Sonobe | Mar 1990 | A |
4912393 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4914438 | Kameyama | Apr 1990 | A |
4914527 | Asai et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4915263 | Corba | Apr 1990 | A |
4922131 | Anderson et al. | May 1990 | A |
4922535 | Dolby | May 1990 | A |
4924492 | Gitlin et al. | May 1990 | A |
4929918 | Chung et al. | May 1990 | A |
4933786 | Wilson | Jun 1990 | A |
4934770 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4939555 | Calderbank et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945538 | Patel | Jul 1990 | A |
4947394 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4952867 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954904 | Goor | Sep 1990 | A |
4958243 | Chen et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4964107 | Galbraith et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967289 | Kanota et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4970609 | Cunningham et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4979055 | Squires et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4979189 | Wile | Dec 1990 | A |
4984099 | Kanota et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4984255 | Davis et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5003555 | Bergmans | Mar 1991 | A |
5008669 | Ishibashi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5010558 | Yost et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5016258 | Tanaka et al. | May 1991 | A |
5021894 | Naito et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5027230 | Nakayama | Jun 1991 | A |
5029186 | Maseng et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5031194 | Crespo et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5031195 | Chevillat et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5040191 | Forney, Jr. et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042036 | Fettweis | Aug 1991 | A |
5048054 | Eyuboglu et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5052031 | Molloy | Sep 1991 | A |
5054034 | Hughes-Hartogs | Oct 1991 | A |
5057946 | Sugiyama | Oct 1991 | A |
5060088 | Dolivo et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5068628 | Ghoshal | Nov 1991 | A |
5068753 | Kanegae | Nov 1991 | A |
5068754 | Garde | Nov 1991 | A |
5068859 | Collins et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070421 | Sumiya et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5073834 | Best et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5077739 | Criswell | Dec 1991 | A |
5095484 | Karabed et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5099367 | Sidman | Mar 1992 | A |
5101357 | Tempelhof | Mar 1992 | A |
5101395 | Cardero et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5105447 | Iwane | Apr 1992 | A |
5107379 | Huber | Apr 1992 | A |
5111483 | Serfaty | May 1992 | A |
5122912 | Kanota et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122959 | Nathanson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122990 | Deines et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123020 | Yoshimura et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5132988 | Fisher et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5134607 | Fuji et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5136439 | Weispfenning et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5136593 | Moon et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5140620 | Woodward | Aug 1992 | A |
5142420 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146475 | Kubo | Sep 1992 | A |
5150050 | Genheimer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5150401 | Ashby et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155637 | Sakata et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5157354 | Saiki et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5159610 | Eyuboglu et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163003 | Kimura | Nov 1992 | A |
5166955 | Ohta | Nov 1992 | A |
5170299 | Moon | Dec 1992 | A |
5173694 | Lynch, Jr. et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175545 | Uchiyama et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177482 | Cideciyan et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181209 | Hagenauer et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5182682 | Weispfenning et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5185747 | Farahati | Feb 1993 | A |
5185806 | Dolby et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5196849 | Galbraith | Mar 1993 | A |
5208816 | Seshardi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5208832 | Greiss | May 1993 | A |
5212601 | Wilson | May 1993 | A |
5214672 | Eyuboglu et al. | May 1993 | A |
5216554 | Schneider | Jun 1993 | A |
5216677 | Takagi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226031 | Abe | Jul 1993 | A |
5228061 | Newby et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230007 | Baum | Jul 1993 | A |
5233482 | Galbraith et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5235540 | Deveirman | Aug 1993 | A |
5237552 | Masood et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241309 | Cideciyan et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243471 | Shinn | Sep 1993 | A |
5243605 | Lekmine et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5247254 | Huber et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5255135 | Itoh et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255136 | Machado et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5260917 | Mashimo | Nov 1993 | A |
5267096 | Buchan et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271042 | Borth et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5287228 | Sawaguchi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5301209 | Wei | Apr 1994 | A |
5304997 | Konno | Apr 1994 | A |
5305384 | Ashby et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5327440 | Fredrickson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5329554 | Behrens et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5331663 | Kurokami | Jul 1994 | A |
5333126 | Fukuda et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337198 | Nishiyama et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341379 | Crisp | Aug 1994 | A |
5347501 | Iimura | Sep 1994 | A |
5357378 | Urakawa | Oct 1994 | A |
5357520 | Arnett et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361174 | Seki et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365547 | Marinaro | Nov 1994 | A |
5367411 | Nishiyama et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5375129 | Cooper | Dec 1994 | A |
5392168 | Iketani | Feb 1995 | A |
5392316 | Sawaguchi et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5402200 | Shrinkle et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5406570 | Berrou et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414570 | Fry et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416760 | Masood et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418660 | Sato et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418795 | Itakura et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420730 | Moon et al. | May 1995 | A |
5424881 | Behrens et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425033 | Jessop et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430661 | Fisher et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432820 | Sugawara et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5434886 | Kazawa et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436771 | Yung | Jul 1995 | A |
5438558 | Ohashi | Aug 1995 | A |
5440474 | Hetzler | Aug 1995 | A |
5446604 | Chiba | Aug 1995 | A |
5450253 | Seki et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450609 | Schultz et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459620 | Tsuchiya | Oct 1995 | A |
5502735 | Cooper | Mar 1996 | A |
5523990 | Chiba | Jun 1996 | A |
5526211 | Hetzler | Jun 1996 | A |
5530600 | Shrinkle | Jun 1996 | A |
5544180 | Gupta | Aug 1996 | A |
5563746 | Bliss | Oct 1996 | A |
5568330 | Sawaguchi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5610808 | Squires et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5640601 | Peters | Jun 1997 | A |
5671048 | Lacey | Sep 1997 | A |
5737142 | Zook | Apr 1998 | A |
5737632 | Oeda et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754353 | Behrens et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771127 | Reed et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5812334 | Behrens et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5844738 | Behrens et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5909332 | Spurbeck et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914830 | Kadlec et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5961658 | Reed et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978162 | Behrens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987634 | Behrens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005731 | Foland et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6028727 | Vishakhadatta et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032284 | Bliss | Feb 2000 | A |
6108808 | Dent | Aug 2000 | A |
6111712 | Vishakhadatta et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125427 | Oeda et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6262857 | Hull et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6313963 | Hsieh | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6366418 | McEwen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411452 | Cloke | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441981 | Cloke et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6519104 | Cloke et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6587529 | Staszewski et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6646822 | Tuttle et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6819514 | Behrens et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20030002188 | Bliss et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0591436 | Nov 1989 | AU |
0636141 | Apr 1993 | AU |
0649879 | Jun 1994 | AU |
0070387 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0083412 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0315295 | May 1989 | EP |
0227389 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0270057 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0155529 | May 1992 | EP |
0207243 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0469033 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0283077 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0425458 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0370772 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0332290 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0390724 | Oct 1995 | EP |
0413505 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0447246 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0420179 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0541580 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0495006 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0523952 | Jun 1999 | EP |
2540695 | May 1988 | FR |
2612025 | Sep 1988 | FR |
2068197 | Aug 1981 | GB |
2198015 | Jun 1988 | GB |
0634302 | Nov 1978 | SU |
WO 9012453 | Oct 1990 | WO |
WO 9106165 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 9120079 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9202928 | Feb 1992 | WO |
WO9210029 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO 9301548 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9303437 | Feb 1993 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080285549 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08838113 | Apr 1997 | US |
Child | 10028871 | US | |
Parent | 08210302 | Mar 1994 | US |
Child | 08838113 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10028871 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 12126188 | US | |
Parent | 08012266 | Feb 1993 | US |
Child | 08210302 | US |