The present invention relates to pulse width modulation and more specifically to filtering pulse width modulated waveforms.
In many cases it is not feasible to impose a DC or low-frequency waveform directly on a given system. Instead a pulse width modulated (PWM) waveform may be produced and then averaged using a low-pass filter.
It is known in the prior art to use a PWM waveform for producing a high-frequency waveform of a desired average. The analog representation can be recovered by demodulating/filtering the waveform. However, as the bandwidth content of the average waveform approaches the carrier frequency, the requirements of the recovery filter become stricter. The filter must reject the carrier frequency while passing through the desired signal. One means to design such a filter is to create a high order low pass linear time invariant filter. One drawback of such a design is phase lag. The higher the order of the filter, the more accurate the filter is, but the greater the phase lag that is introduced which is undesirable in a feedback control system.
Another approach to retrieving the analog version of the PWM waveform is to integrate the PWM waveform over one PWM period and to calculate the average value over one cycle. An embodiment of such a circuit is shown in FIG. 1 as taken from U.S. Pat. No. 5,619,114. Such a circuit requires an integrator, amplifier, and a calibration scheme to account for component tolerance. Thus, there is a need for a simpler system and method for obtaining the analog representation of a PWM waveform, when frequency content of this analog representation is significant when compared to the PWM frequency.
One embodiment of the invention is a device for filtering a carrier frequency of a PWM waveform. The PWM waveform has one or more pulses wherein each pulse is created at a pulse frequency rate. Such a device may be used to measure an actual load voltage and used as in input signal in a frequency control loop. For example, a load may be for a motor, such as a motor that is used in a self-balancing personal vehicle. The voltage is converted to a torque, which allows the motor of the personal vehicle to turn the wheels. A predetermined voltage is expected to occur at the motor, however due to real-world factors, the actual voltage is not equal to the predetermined value at the load. The actual voltage is then used as the input to the frequency control loop/speed control loop for the self-balancing personal vehicle.
The device includes a low-pass filter for converting the PWM waveform into an analog signal. The device further includes a sampling analog-to-digital to converter receiving the analog signal from the low-pass filter and the device also includes a controller for causing the non-integrating analog to digital converter to sample the PWM waveform at the pulse frequency rate thereby rejecting the carrier frequency. As already stated the PWM waveform includes a pulse which has a leading edge, a top portion, and a trailing edge. In one embodiment, the controller causes the A/D converter to sample during the top of the pulse.
Preferably, the controller causes the A/D converter to sample at substantially the center of the pulse. In another embodiment, the controller causes the A/D converter to sample at the bottom of the pulse and preferably at the center of the bottom of the pulse. It should be understood that the bottom of the pulse is the time during which the pulse of the PWM waveform is low, however due to filtering the signal is not equal to zero. Sampling should occur during each pulse frequency period. In a further embodiment, the controller causes the A/D converter to sample substantially at the top center of the pulse and at the bottom of the pulse and then the sampled values are averaged together. In this embodiment, sampling occurs at least twice during the pulse frequency period.
In one embodiment, the low pass filter is a simple first order RC circuit. In another embodiment, the low pass filter is a second order filter which has only one major pole. In other embodiments, the low pass filter may be second order or greater. In such embodiments in which the filter is second order or greater, more must be done to compensate for the phase lag that is caused by higher order filters. One solution is sampling after the center of the pulse.
The PWM waveform in one embodiment is single ended and in other embodiments the PWM waveform may be a differential signal.
In certain embodiments the controller that is used for signaling the sampling analog-to-digital converter to sample may also be used to create the PWM waveform. In some embodiments the controller does not have timing information for causing the analog to digital converter to sample and thus an edge detector is included. The edge detector senses one or more edges of the filtered PWM waveform (analog signal). The sensing of the edge can be used for signaling the analog to digital converter to sample. In other embodiments the values of the signal at the leading and the trailing edge of the pulse are averaged to provide the sampling value.
The device may further include a compensation function module that receives the output of the digital to analog converter and compensates for known errors.
In one embodiment, a voltage source produces a bus voltage. The PWM waveform is fed to one or more switches that open and close according to the duty cycle of the PWM waveform. When the switch is closed the bus voltage is occurs across the load. This voltage is also presented to the low pass filter. In another embodiment, there is a plurality of loads and a plurality of switches. In such an embodiment a differential signal between the two loads is provided to a differential filter prior to providing a filtered version of the differential signal to the analog to digital converter.
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Definitions. As used in this description and the accompanying claims, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated, unless the context otherwise requires: a “pulse-width modulated waveform” is a digital representation of an analog signal. The “duty cycle” is the fraction of time for which a pulse waveform is at an “on” level. The remainder of the time, the waveform is at an “off” level. The “switching period” is the period of the PWM waveform. For example,
Because the actual average voltage across the inductive load may be different from the intended average voltage due to non-linearities in a power circuit, for instance a proper measurement of the actual average voltage may be necessary for feedback control. The actual average voltage may be different than the intended voltage for several reasons, such as voltage drops across the switches/diodes, faults in the circuit such as an open or short circuit etc. Synchronous sampling is thus used to obtain the actual average voltage across the load. The voltage that is presented to the inductive load is also presented at Vin. This input voltage is filtered through a simple one pole low pass filter which may be an RC circuit. The filtered signal is then passed into a sampling analog-to-digital converter 330 that samples at the same sampling rate as that which was used to create the PWM waveform. The sampled signal Vp is equal to the actual average voltage (Vpwm) plus an error E*(Vbus). This system is useful if E is small. This sampled voltage Vp can then be fed to a feedback control loop that adjusts the PWM waveform to compensate for any nonlinearities in the power circuitry. This compensation may be used in an open-loop or closed-loop manner, as appropriate for a particular application.
In order to retrieve the duty cycle from the Vout signal the sampling A/D converter is provided with Vbus as an input. Since the average voltage <Vpwm>=D*(Vbus), and since the sampled signal Vp=<Vpwm>+E*(Vbus), Vbus may be divided out to get D′=Vp/Vbus=D+E.
In one embodiment such a system may be used in a human transporter to control the voltage signal that is used to power motors for a wheeled vehicle, such as, a human transporter as made by Segway company LLC as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,288,505 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In an embodiment as shown in
In the embodiment shown in
This synchronous sampling at the carrier frequency causes the carrier to be aliased to DC. An important component is the timing of the sampling is to minimize this aliased DC component. For example,
In a first embodiment, the sample is taken at the center of the pulse by the A/D converter as shown in
The output from the A/D converter is then compared to the expected average voltage and an error signal can be determined. The error signal is passed back to a feedback control loop that adjusts the PWM waveform that is produced by the microcontroller. An example of such a feedback system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,288,505 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
It should be noted that the RC time constant τf works preferably well if it is approximately between 0.1 and 5 T where T is the PWM period. It should also be noted that when the RC time constant is less than 0.1 T the time constant is too short and excessive ripple occurs and when the time constant is greater than 5T there is extensive phase lag.
With the first three methods as described above (sampling at the center top, sampling at the center bottom and averaging the center top and the center bottom), a first order RC filter is preferred because the carrier attenuation is 2nd order such that the harmonics are attenuated at 40 dB/decade due to the proper phase relationship between the harmonic component and the sampling waveform. More specifically, when a harmonic component of the carrier waveform at frequency fh passes through such a first-order filter, its amplitude is multiplied by a gain factor
Once the harmonic frequency fh exceed the cutoff frequency
this gain |H(fh)| rolls off at 20 dB/decade. Prior to the filter, harmonics of a pulse waveform have a peak which is exactly in phase with the top center of the pulse. After the filter, these harmonics see a phase lag φ=−∠H(fh)=tan−1 2πfhRC which begins to approach 90 degrees as fh exceeds fc. The component of these harmonics, when sampled exactly at the top center of the pulse, is reduced further by a gain of
which rolls off at 20 dB/decade. (These effects are illustrated in
Systems that cannot avoid 2nd-order and higher poles can still be used as long as they occur at a much higher frequency than the dominant 1st-order pole. In another embodiment where a higher order filter is used, the effect of the higher order poles can be compensated for by sampling later than the middle of the PWM waveform to reduce the effect of the amplification of the higher order harmonics. For example if τr=0.1τf where τf=1.00T sampling could be chosen to be at, for example, 0.06T later than the center of the pulse as shown in
In another embodiment, the system may be adapted for repeatable errors, thus making the filter more accurate.
In yet another embodiment, in which the timing of the original signal is not known, such that the center of each pulse is not identified, an edge detector may be added to the system of
In another variation the technique can be applied to a differential input as shown in
If resistors and capacitors R1, R2, and C1 are not matched pairs then mismatch will cause a common-mode component to couple into the sampled data. In particular, the filter will let through high-frequency content if there is a mismatch in time constants seen at the + and − terminals of the amplifier, that would not be present if the time constants were matched. For this reason, the dominant pole in this circuit should be formed by R3 and C3.
In the differential embodiment, both PWM legs (leg for V1 and leg for V2) are preferably center-based PWM synchronous to the sampling point such that the sampling is done synchronous to the center of V1's PWM pulse and also to the center of V2's PWM pulse. This reduces the overall error. The error in the output as compared to a perfect measurement ((D1−D2) Vbus where D1 is the duty cycle of for leg one and D2 is the duty cycle for leg two) is the difference between the errors that would result if each of V1 and V2 were synchronously sampled individually. The filter's time constant is selected such that the sampling time is close to the center of the PWM waveforms, as such, the errors in measuring V1 and V2 are small and therefore the error in Vout (which is the difference between the errors of V1 and V2) is also small. This circuit can be extended to any linear combination of signals. In such an embodiment, each signal would be a center-based PWM input that is sampled synchronously to the waveform center. The error due to sampling synchronously of the multiple inputs would be a linear combination of each signal's error. For example, if there were three inputs (x1, x2, x3) as shown in
The above differential circuit provided above can be implemented to handle ground differences between power semiconductors and measurement circuitry as shown in
Synchronous sampling accomplished in an A/D converter can be implemented in other systems. For example, in a communications system in which there is a noisy channel, digital data may be transmitted to reject the noise rather than an analog signal. A PWM waveform may be used to represent an analog value in such a system and may be produced by a processor or micro-controller for example. By filtering and synchronous sampling of the PWM waveform, this methodology can be used to recapture the desired analog signal by filtering out the carrier frequency. The communications system may be a network for example, either wired or wireless or the system may be between two different circuits. In an embodiment in which the communications system is two different circuits the circuits may be at different potential and use a transformer or an opto-isolator to transmit. In such a system, it is more noise-immune to transmit in the digital domain and as such transmission of the analog signal values in a PWM format allows the voltage potential to be more readily changed. Again as before, the analog signal may be regained by filtering the PWM waveform which is created using the potential of the receiving circuit and synchronously sampling the PWM waveform at the carrier frequency. If the sending and receiving circuits are separate in a communications system, and the desired sampling instant is at top or bottom center of the PWM pulse, the knowledge of when to sample is not directly available to the receiving circuit and must be obtained somehow. In one embodiment the sending circuit should transmit an additional signal having a short synchronization pulse located at the center of each PWM pulse, so that the receiving circuit could use this signal to trigger the A/D converter. In another embodiment, the receiving circuit should have a phase-locked loop to reconvert A/D trigger pulses which are synchronized to the top or bottom center of the PWM waveform. If the desired sampling instant is at the rising and falling edges of the PWM pulse, the use of an edge detector, as explained above, to trigger the A/D converter is sufficient.
The method of filtering and synchronously sampling to remove the carrier frequency may be employed in configurations in which the originating signal is either an analog or digital signal. This can be seen in
Although the invention has been described with reference to several preferred embodiments, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention, as set forth in the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3766497 | Opal et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
4212074 | Kuno et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4337438 | Guggenbuhl et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4504777 | Bauer | Mar 1985 | A |
4947723 | Kawashima et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5355136 | Katagiri | Oct 1994 | A |
5392042 | Pellon | Feb 1995 | A |
5619114 | Blasko | Apr 1997 | A |
5706186 | Blasko | Jan 1998 | A |
6456946 | O'Gorman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6788792 | Maejima et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6813124 | Pierson | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6873142 | Pierson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6963194 | Wu | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7193388 | Skinner et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
20040113671 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61135375 | Jun 1986 | JP |
04140064 | May 1992 | JP |
10210757 | Aug 1998 | JP |