Synchronously-switched multi-input demodulating comparator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11469931
  • Patent Number
    11,469,931
  • Date Filed
    Sunday, July 4, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 11, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Methods and systems are described for obtaining a set of carrier-modulated symbols of a carrier-modulated codeword, each carrier-modulated symbol received via a respective wire of a plurality of wires of a multi-wire bus, applying each carrier-modulated symbol of the set of carrier-modulated symbols to a corresponding transistor of a set of transistors, the set of transistors further connected to a pair of output nodes according to a sub-channel vector of a plurality of mutually orthogonal sub-channel vectors, recovering a demodulation signal from the carrier-modulated symbols, and generating a demodulated sub-channel data output as a differential voltage on the pair of output nodes based on a linear combination of the set of carrier-modulated symbols by controlling conductivity of the set of transistors according to the demodulation signal.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to communications in general and in particular to the transmission of signals capable of conveying information and detection of those signals in wired communication.


BACKGROUND

In communication systems, a goal is to transport information from one physical location to another. It is typically desirable that the transport of this information is reliable, is fast and consumes a minimal amount of resources. Methods of information transport are broadly categorized into “baseband” methods that dedicate use of the physical communications channel to one transport method, and “broadband” methods that partition the physical communications channel in the frequency domain, creating two or more independent frequency channels upon which a transport method may be applied.


Baseband methods may be further categorized by physical medium. One common information transfer medium is the serial communications link, which may be based on a single wire circuit relative to ground or other common reference, multiple such circuits relative to ground or other common reference, or multiple such circuits used in relation to each other. A common example of the latter uses differential signaling (“DS”). Differential signaling operates by sending a signal on one wire and the opposite of that signal on a matching wire. The signal information is represented by the difference between the wires, rather than their absolute values relative to ground or other fixed reference.


Parallel data transfer is also commonly used to provide increased interconnection bandwidth, with busses growing from 16 or fewer wires, to 32, 64, and more. As crosstalk and noise induced on the parallel signal lines can produce receive errors, parity was added to improve error detection, and signal anomalies were addressed through active bus termination methods. However, these wide data transfer widths inevitably resulted in data skew, which became the limiting factor in increased bus data transfer throughput. Alternative approaches were developed utilizing narrower bus widths operating at much higher clock speeds, with significant effort placed on optimizing the transmission line characteristics of the interconnection medium, including use of impedance-controlled connectors and micro stripline wiring. Even so, the inevitable path imperfections required use of active equalization and inter-symbol interference (ISI) elimination techniques, including active pre-emphasis compensation for transmitters and Continuous Time Linear Equalization (CTLE) and Decision Feedback Equalization (DFE) for receivers, all of which increased the complexity and power consumption of the communications interface.


A number of signaling methods are known that maintain the desirable properties of DS, while increasing pin efficiency over DS. One such method is Vector signaling. With vector signaling, a plurality of signals on a plurality of wires is considered collectively although each of the plurality of signals might be independent. Thus, vector signaling codes can combine the robustness of single circuit DS and the high wire count data transfer throughput of parallel data transfer. Each of the collective signals in the transport medium carrying a vector signaling codeword is referred to as a component, and the number of plurality of wires is referred to as the “dimension” of the codeword (sometimes also called a “vector”). With binary vector signaling, each component or “symbol” of the vector takes on one of two possible values. With non-binary vector signaling, each symbol has a value that is a selection from a set of more than two possible values. The set of values that a symbol of the vector may take on is called the “alphabet” of the vector signaling code. A vector signaling code, as described herein, is a collection C of vectors of the same length N, called codewords. Any suitable subset of a vector signaling code denotes a “subcode” of that code. Such a subcode may itself be a vector signaling code. In operation, the coordinates of the codewords are bounded, and we choose to represent them by real numbers between −1 and 1. The ratio between the binary logarithm of the size of C and the length N is called the pin-efficiency of the vector signaling code. A vector signaling code is called “balanced” if for all its codewords the sum of the coordinates is always zero. Additional examples of vector signaling methods are described in Cronie I, Cronie II, Cronie III, Cronie IV, Fox I, Fox II, Fox III, Holden I, Shokrollahi I, Shokrollahi II, and Hormati I.


As previously described, broadband signaling methods partition the available information transfer medium in the frequency domain, creating two or more frequency-domain “channels” which may then may transport information in a comparable manner to baseband circuits, using known methods of carrier modulation to convert the baseband information into a frequency-domain channel signal. As each such channel can be independently controlled as to amplitude, modulation, and information encoding, it is possible to adapt the collection of channels to widely varying information transfer medium characteristics, including variations in signal loss, distortion, and noise over time and frequency.


Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line or ADSL is one widely deployed broadband signaling method used to transport digital data over legacy copper telephony circuits. In ADSL, each of potentially several hundred frequency-domain channels is independently configured for amplitude, modulation method, and digital carrying capacity, based on the particular noise and loss characteristics of the copper circuit being used for transport.


BRIEF DESCRIPTION

Methods and systems are described for obtaining a set of carrier-modulated symbols of a carrier-modulated codeword, each carrier-modulated symbol received via a respective wire of a plurality of wires of a multi-wire bus, applying each carrier-modulated symbol of the set of carrier-modulated symbols to a corresponding transistor of a set of transistors, each transistor of the set of transistors connected to a respective output node of a pair of output nodes according to elements of a sub-channel vector, and controlling conductivity of the set of transistors according to a demodulation signal operating at a frequency recovered from the carrier-modulated symbols to responsively generate a demodulated sub-channel data output as a linear combination of the set of carrier-modulated symbols forming a differential voltage on the pair of output nodes.


Communication of digital information using a combination of baseband and broadband techniques over multiple wires is described. A four wire communications channel having 35 dB of attenuation at 37.5 GHz is used in provided examples as a typical transport medium for use with the systems and methods described herein. One embodiment creates two frequency-based channels over the transport medium, with each channel using a combination of a vector signaling code and duobinary encoding to transport sets of three data bits over four wires at an effective rate of 56 Gigabits per second per wire.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a receiver embodiment.



FIG. 2 is a schematic of one embodiment of a circuit detecting one ENRZ subchannel.



FIG. 3 is a schematic of another embodiment of a circuit detecting one ENRZ subchannel.



FIG. 4 is a schematic of one embodiment of a circuit detecting one carrier-modulated ENRZ subchannel.



FIG. 5 is a schematic of another embodiment of a circuit detecting one carrier-modulated ENRZ subchannel.



FIG. 6 is a schematic of a further embodiment of a circuit detecting one carrier-modulated ENRZ subchannel.



FIG. 7 illustrates waveforms for the carrier-modulated data encoding and decoding operations.



FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate alternative embodiments for receiver clock generation.



FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a method, in accordance with some embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Interconnection has long been a limiting factor in the design of large digital systems. Whether at the level of modules interconnected by a backplane, or of functional subsystems interconnected within a large printed circuit board, the need for reliable, error free, high-speed digital interconnection has constantly pushed the limits of available technology to its limits.


The systems and methods described herein provide robust, reliable transfer of data between at least one transmitting device and at least one receiving device, at data rates of at least 50 Gigabits per second per interconnection wire. An example channel model having the frequency- and time-domain characteristics illustrated in FIG. 1 will be used. It will be obvious to one familiar with the art that such a transport channel is incompatible with conventional communication signaling methods; for example, straightforward NRZ signaling at an example 112 Gibabits/second has a Nyquist frequency of 56 GHz, corresponding to an intractable 46 dB attenuation over the proposed physical transport channel.


This proposed data rate also strains integrated circuit data processing capabilities within the attached transmitting and receiving devices. It is therefore presumed that high-speed data handling in these devices will be distributed across multiple parallel processing “phases”. As one example, rather than a single data path handling data at 100 Gigabits per second (i.e. with merely 10 picosecond between bits), the same data stream may be distributed across sixteen processing phases, each one thus having a more reasonable 160 picoseconds of processing time per bit. However, this added processing time comes at the cost of significantly increased complexity from the additional processing elements. This distribution of processing also can lead to increased latency before a given digital bit result becomes available, limiting the ability to utilize that result in predicting a subsequent bit result, which is the basis of the Decision Feedback Equalization or DFE method.


The increasing data transfer rates also lead to physical issues as the wavelength of the propagating signals on the interconnection shrinks. As one example, the propagating signal wavelength at 56 Gigahertz on a printed circuit micro stripline is approximately 4 millimeters, thus periodic anomalies with merely fractional wavelength dimensions (even including the weave of the impregnated fabric comprising the circuit board) may represent a significant disturbance to signal integrity, stressing available equalization and compensation methods.


Encoding Information Using Hadamard Transforms


As taught in [Cronie I], the Hadamard Transform, also known as the Walsh-Hadamard transform, is a square matrix of entries +1 and −1 so arranged that both all rows and all columns are mutually orthogonal. Hadamard matrices are known for all sizes 2N as well as for selected other sizes. In particular, the description herein utilizes the 4×4 Hadamard matrix as the example encoder.


The order 4 Hadamard matrix used in our examples is:










H
4

=

[




+
1




+
1




+
1




+
1






+
1




-
1




+
1




-
1






+
1




+
1




-
1




-
1






+
1




-
1




-
1




+
1




]





(

Eqn
.




1

)








and encoding of the three informational bits A, B, C may be obtained by multiplying those informational bits times the rows 2, 3, and 4 of the Hadamard matrix H4 to obtain four output values, subsequently called “symbol values”. By convention, the results are scaled by an appropriate constant factor so as to bound the symbol values to the range +1 to −1. It may be noted that the first row of H4 corresponds to common mode signaling, which is not used herein, with the next three vectors being used to encode bits A, B, and C respectively into outputs W, X, Y, Z, these vectors also being called “modes” or “subchannels” of the Hadamard code. As the encoded outputs simultaneously carry information derived from the encoding of A, B, and C, the outputs will be a superposition or summation of modes, i.e. a sum of the sub-channel code vectors of the vector signaling code.


One familiar with the art will note that all possible values of A, B, C encoded in this manner result in mode summed values for W, X, Y, Z which are balanced; that is, summing to the constant value zero. If the mode summed values for W, X, Y, Z are scaled such that their maximum absolute value is 1 (that is, the signals are in the range +1 to −1 for convenience of description,) it will be noted that all achievable values are permutations of the vector (+1, −1/3, −1/3, −1/3) or of the vector (−1, 1/3, 1/3, 1/3). These are called the codewords of the vector signaling code H4. As used herein, this H4 code will subsequently be called Ensemble NRZ code or ENRZ and will be used as a representative example of vector signaling code in subsequent examples, without implying limitation.


ENRZ


[Hormati I] teaches that ENRZ has optimum Inter Symbol Interference (ISI) characteristics, and [Holden I] and [Ulrich I] teach it is capable of efficient detection. As previously described, ENRZ encodes three binary data bits into a four-symbol codeword for transmission, as one example, over four wires of a transport medium. If ENRZ signaling is used over four wires of the proposed channel, the data transfer rate may be achieved with merely a 75 Gigasymbol/second signaling rate, equivalent to 112 Gbps per wire pair, for the two pair transport channel.


Duobinary Encoding


Duobinary encoding is a solution known in the art in which consecutive bits of a serially transmitted data stream are processed to shape and constrain the resulting transmit data spectrum. It is well known that Inter-Symbol Interference (ISI) such as may be produced by transmission medium perturbations will result in the received amplitude of a signal in one unit interval to be perturbed by residual energy from previous unit intervals. As one example, inverted pulse reflections from a perturbation of the transmission medium will cause a received signal to be reduced by the residual influence of previously transmitted signals. Thus, a transmitter informed of this effect might combine a presently transmitted signal value with that of a previous transmission, in an attempt to anticipate or pre-compensate for this inter-symbol interference effect. Thus, use of partial response codes such as duobinary are often described as a particular form of pre-equalization filtering intended to produce constructive ISI, rather than as a literal data encoding means.


As described in [Beyene], other partial-response codes are known to have comparable ISI management capabilities. For reference purposes, the characteristic equations defining these encodings or filterings are listed in Table I.












Table I







Partial Response System
Characteristic Equation









Duobinary
xn + xn-1



Dicode
xn − xn-1



Modified Duobinary
xn − xn-2



Class 2
xn + 2xn-1 + xn-2










Unless otherwise described, as used herein the duobinary processing performed is assumed to be a summation of the present and immediately previous transmit unit interval signal, each scaled by a factor of 0.5. Optionally, this may be combined with a transmit lowpass filter to further control the transmit spectrum. In other embodiments, ISI-controlling encoding is combined in any order with Hadamard encoding, where the ISI-controlling encoding is any of duobinary, modified duobinary, dicode, class2, or a Hamming filter as subsequently described. In such embodiments, the ISI-controlling encoding may also be described as being performed by a partial response encoder, embodying any of the partial response encodings or filterings above.


If the characteristics of the communications channel are extremely well understood, it may be possible to configure the ISI-controlling operation of the transmitter such that no explicit complementary operation is required at the receiver, the effective action of the channel characteristics themselves serving to perform the inverse operation. Other embodiments may explicitly detect, as one example, the ternary signals produced by duobinary encoding of binary data, followed by an explicit duobinary to binary decoding operation. Alternatively, commonly used receiver ISI elimination techniques such as DFE will also efficiently address the effects of such transmitter ISI compensation. As example receivers in this document incorporate DFE, no further receiver duobinary (or other partial response code) processing will be shown.


Channelization


Physical transport channel limitations have been seen and addressed before, albeit at far lower data rates, during the efforts to provide high speed digital services over the legacy copper wire infrastructure of the telephony network. For DSL at its desired 3 Megabit data rate, a propagating signal wavelength was several hundred meters, which correlated strongly with the typical spacing of wire stubs, splices, and insulation abrasions seen in the field. Thus, an uncompensated frequency response for a typical copper telephony signal path would exhibit numerous notches and slopes caused by reflective interference among those anomalies, dissipative attenuation from degraded wires and insulation, and intrusive noise from sources such as AM radio transmitters.


Ultimately, multichannel frequency domain channelization was used to constrain the effect of those legacy transport issues. One commonly deployed Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) solution, for example, partitioned the approximate 1 MHz of available transport medium bandwidth into 4.3125 kHz channels. Each channel was then independently tested for attenuation and signal-to-noise ratio, with different data throughput rates assigned to each channel depending on those test results. Thus, a channel frequency coinciding with a frequency response notch or significant external noise source would not be used, while other channels not presenting those issues could be used at full capacity. Unfortunately, the generation and detection of such a high channel count protocol relies on the availability of inexpensive digital signal processing solutions, and such technology has scaled in performance over time by perhaps a factor of ten, versus the approximate factor of 100,000 data rate increase in the present application.


Thus, although the present channel attenuation issues suggest a broadband approach may be useful, the conventional high-channel-count embodiment methods known to the art are incompatible with the anticipated data rate. A new approach specifically designed for high speed processing will be described.


Broadband Duobinary ENRZ


[Hormati III] gives examples of several embodiments combining ENRZ signaling with an additional serial transmission encoding such as Duobinary, utilizing multiple frequency-domain channels. Those examples and teachings are incorporated by reference herein, in their entirety for all purposes.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a further receiver embodiment that will be used to illustrate the following examples. In the receiver of FIG. 1, four communications wires w0-w3 carry a mixture of baseband and broadband signals; a first frequency channel is at baseband, i.e. comparable to a typical wire communication channel known in the art. The second frequency channel is herein called the “carrier”, “carrier-modulated”, or “broadband” channel, and is composed of ENRZ+duobinary signaling modulating a sinusoidal carrier, chosen to minimize the frequency overlap between spectral components of the baseband and of the carrier channel.


As in [Hormati III], a carrier frequency of 37.5 GHz is assumed. Both baseband and carrier channels run at a signaling rate of 37.5 Gsymbols/second, with a first set of three data bits being transported over the four wires of the baseband channel, and a second set of three data bits being transported over the same four wires using the carrier channel.


Other embodiments are known in which the baseband signaling rate differs from the carrier signaling rate, and/or differ from the carrier frequency. Generally speaking, however, there are implementation advantages in keeping these relationships fixed, often being expressed as ratios of small integer values, as in the 1:1:1 example provided above. As one example of such advantage, a receiver embodiment may then maintain a single local oscillator clock derived from one such received signal, and then derive the other necessary receive clocks from it through known phase lock or delay lock methods.


Filters 110 and 115 separate the received signals into a broadband component including a set of carrier-modulated symbols of a carrier-modulated codeword and a baseband component including a set of baseband symbols of a baseband codeword. For descriptive simplicity, FIG. 1 includes a High-pass filter 110 to generate the carrier-modulated symbols and a Low-pass filter 115 to generate the baseband symbols, although in practice band-pass or band-rejection filters may also be applicable. Following the baseband signal flow from the output of filter 115, so-called Multi-Input Comparators (MICs) 130 as per [Holden I] and [Ulrich I] perform weighted linear combinations of the various wire signals represented as baseband symbols, producing outputs which detect the individual subchannel data outputs of the ENRZ code. MICs 130 may additionally perform a slicing or time and amplitude sampling or measurement of each subchannel data output under control of a sampling clock provided by Clock/Data Recovery (CDR) subsystem 165.


As shown in FIG. 1, different system considerations may include different synchronization sources for CDR 165. In a first embodiment (1), a data-sampling clock is derived from data transitions of the detected subchannel data itself, using methods as described in [Hormati IV]. In a second embodiment (2), a subchannel of the ENRZ baseband signal provides a synchronization source, either by dedication to a periodic clock signal, or by augmentation of the transition density of a data stream to guarantee sufficient edge information to maintain clock synchronization. A third embodiment (3) uses a transmitted clock or synchronization signal distinct from the ENRZ data to synchronize the CDR subsystem, which may be transmitted from the transmitter to the receiver via a dedicated differential pair of wires.


As with the baseband data path, the broadband data detection path incorporates MIC-demodulation circuits 120, samplers 127, and CDR 150 functions. However, as broadband encoded data is modulated onto a carrier, simple data detection cannot be performed without addressing the carrier signal as well.


As is well understood in the art, a signal modulated on a carrier may be mixed with a demodulations signal provided by e.g., a local oscillator, to return the carrier-modulated signals to baseband (a heterodyne receiver,) or data detection may be timed relative to not only data sampling rate, but also relative to the carrier rate (a synchronous detector.) In FIG. 1, such an operation is performed by MIC-Demodulation circuits 120, as will be subsequently described. The demodulation signal may be generated by frequency multiplier 160, which in this example offered without limitation derives a carrier frequency reference from a sampling clock signal generated by baseband CDR 165. The detected subchannel information is processed using a Low Pass Filter 125, to remove residual artifacts of the heterodyne or synchronous detection operation of MIC-demodulation circuits 120. Carrier CDR subsystem 150 produces a data-sampling clock appropriate for the demodulated broadband channel data sampling 127. Depending on the particular demodulation method used by 120, Demodulation clock manager 140 may provide a demodulation signal as generated by frequency multiplier 160, a data sampling clock as provided by 150, or a combination of clocks for demodulation.


Alternative embodiments may synchronize a receiver clock to the carrier and derive other sampling clocks from that derived reference source, may synchronize a receiver clock to a detected data stream and derive other sampling clocks from that derived reference source, or utilize a combination of said methods. Synchronization may utilize a local voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) or voltage controlled delay in a phase-locked or delay-locked loop generating a local clock signal. Alternatively, synchronization may rely upon utilizing a phase comparator result that configures a phase interpolator or adjustable delay to modify the phase of a local clock signal.


Synchronously-Switched Multi-Input Demodulating Comparator



FIG. 2 is a schematic showing one embodiment of a linear mode ENRZ detector. Input signals w0, w1, w2, w3 are the received wire signals carrying the low-pass filtered (not shown) baseband symbols of the baseband codeword, and are connected to the transistors in accordance with a particular subchannel of the ENRZ code. That is, positive values of the subchannel vector indicate that the wire is connected to a transistor contributing to an output in a positive manner, while negative values indicate that the respective wire is connected to a transistor contributing to a negative portion of the output. Thus, in FIG. 2, the wires are connected to the transistors in accordance with the subchannel vector [1, −1, 1, −1], and the differential outputs QH and QL correspond to the result of the linear combination generated by the computation

Q=(w0+w2)−(w1+w3)  (Eqn. 2)


As described in [Holden I], three instances of Eqn. 2 with different permutations of the input signals efficiently detect the three subchannel data outputs of the ENRZ code. Thus, the baseband detector 130 of FIG. 1 may be composed of three instances of the circuit of FIG. 2.



FIG. 3 is an embodiment of a synchronously-switched demodulating MIC circuit (also referred to herein as a “MIC-demodulation circuit”) implementing the same linear combination of the MIC in FIG. 2, in which the demodulation signal CK_d operating at the carrier frequency is used to gate operation of the MIC-demodulation circuit, allowing synchronous detection of carrier-modulated symbols of the carrier-modulated codeword. In a practical embodiment, CK_d will be phase locked to the carrier frequency provided by frequency multiplier 160 in FIG. 1. As shown in FIG. 3, the MIC-demodulation circuits obtains a set of carrier-modulated symbols of a carrier-modulated codeword. Each carrier-modulated symbol may be received via a respective wire of a plurality of wires of a multi-wire bus, and may have been high-pass (or band-pass) filtered prior to being applied to a corresponding transistor of the set of transistors shown. Each transistor is connected to a respective output node of a pair of output nodes according to elements of a sub-channel vector. For example, in the example shown in FIG. 3, the set of transistors connected to wires [w0 w1 w2 w3] are connected to the pair of output nodes QL and QH according to the sub-channel vector [1 −1 1 −1], which corresponds to the second row of the H4 Hadamard matrix given in Eqn. 1. The sets of transistors making up the MICs for the other two sub-channels may be connected to pairs of output nodes according to the other sub-channel vectors in the H4 Hadamard matrix that are mutually orthogonal to the [1 −1 1 −1] sub-channel vector. In some further embodiments, each transistor in the set of transistors may apply a respective magnitude weight to the carrier-modulated symbol according to the sub-channel vector. Eqn. 3 below is one particular matrix that includes sub-channel vectors having various magnitudes. Magnitude weights may be applied e.g., according to relative transistor dimensions, current source magnitudes, and/or multiple equal-sized transistors connected in parallel. The conductivity of the set of transistors is synchronously switched, and is controlled according to the demodulation signal CK_d, which is operating at a frequency recovered from the carrier-modulated symbols to responsively generate a demodulated sub-channel data output as a linear combination performed according to Eqn. 2 of the set of carrier-modulated symbols, which forms a differential voltage on the pair of output nodes.









[



1


1


1


1


1


1




1



-
1



0


0


0


0




1


1



-
2



0


0


0




0


0


0


1



-
1



0




0


0


0


1


1



-
2





1


1


1



-
1




-
1




-
1




]




(

Eqn
.




3

)








FIG. 4 is a further embodiment of a MIC-demodulation ENRZ detector. The MIC-demodulation circuit operates in a dynamic mode, charging the node capacitance of the pair of output nodes QH and QL when a sampling clock CK operating at the symbol rate is low, and selectably providing a discharge path for those nodes through the set of input transistors to ground when CK is high. As the nodes discharge, a differential output signal corresponding to the result of Eqn. 2 is produced at output nodes QH and QL. In such an embodiment, the sampling clock simultaneously acts as the demodulation signal as the carrier-modulated symbols are demodulated and the linear combination is sliced according to the sampling clock. Such an embodiment may occur when the sampling clock rate and the carrier frequency are equal. In some alternative embodiments, as shown, synchronous switching may be achieved using a demodulation signal CK_d to periodically interrupt or gate the dynamic operation of the detector at a carrier frequency rate, allowing direct detection of signals modulating a carrier. In some such embodiments, the demodulation signal CK_d may be an integer multiple of the baseband symbol baud rate of sampling clock CK, e.g., 2×, 3×, etc. Alternatively, the demodulation signal may have a frequency that is a fraction of the sampling clock rate.



FIG. 5 is a full-wave variation of the half-wave synchronous detector of FIG. 3. As with the half-wave detector, synchronously-switched ENRZ detection is gated by action of demodulation signal CK_d+ and its inverse or complement CK_d− which are phase locked to the carrier frequency. In an alternative embodiment, each differential pair of transistors may be composed of an NMOS device and a PMOS device that both receive the same demodulation signal CK_d+. In this full-wave circuit variation, the contribution of each input to the pair of output nodes is steered on alternating half cycles of the clock to the inverting and non-inverting result outputs, effectively doubling the output signal and substantially reducing the need for output filtering. The steering is performed by a plurality of differential pairs of transistors connected to the pair of output nodes for selectably connecting each transistor of the set of transistors to a respective output node according to the demodulation signal and its inverse. As shown, the set of transistors receiving the carrier-modulated symbols are alternately connected between the pair of output nodes via respective differential pairs of transistors. For each sub-channel MIC, the differential pairs of transistors may be connected according to the respective sub-channel vector of the plurality of mutually orthogonal sub-channel vectors. In the case of FIG. 5, the differential pairs of transistors are connected to the pair of output nodes according to the sub-channel vector [1 −1 1 −1].



FIG. 6 illustrates a discrete full-wave variation of the discrete half-wave dynamic synchronous detector of FIG. 4. Sampling clock CK controls the dynamic charge/discharge operation of the circuit, while demodulation signal CK_d+ and its complement CK_d− gate detection to be synchronous with the carrier frequency, as described above.


In the examples of FIGS. 4 and 6, the timing of the two clock signals may be coordinated so as to be compatible with the dynamic circuit operation. Specifically, in FIG. 4 a pre-charge operation occurring when clock CK is low may precede each discharge or integration cycle occurring when clocks CK_d and CK are both high. In FIG. 6, a full cycle of clock CK (i.e. a pre-charge cycle and a discharge cycle) may occur for each half-cycle of CK_d. Alternatively, the integration time for the circuit may be long enough to encompass two or more half-cycles of CK_d. In a further alternative embodiment, the demodulation signal CK_d+/− may be an integer multiple of CK. In such embodiments, multiple cycles of CK_d essentially gate the signal into or out of the integration period. In such embodiments, the pair of output nodes are pre-charged according to the sampling clock, and the pair of output nodes are only discharged when the carrier-modulated symbols at the inputs of the transistors have the correct polarity. In the full-wave embodiment, the pair of output nodes are always discharged, but the connections of the set of transistors receiving the carrier-modulated symbols to the pair of output nodes is alternated according to the demodulation signal as the carrier-modulated symbols alternate according to the modulation.


Operation of the half-wave and full-wave synchronous detectors is illustrated in the waveforms of FIG. 7. As described in [Hormati III], a transmitter multiplies Transmit Data and a Carrier-rate clock to produce a carrier-modulated signal. A receiver locally generates a carrier-rate demodulation clock, which is combined with the received signal in a synchronous detector to produce a detectable receive data signal. The carrier-modulated signal is encoded into carrier-modulated symbols of a carrier-modulated codeword and transmitted over the wires of the multi-wire bus.


The illustrated Return-to-Zero (RTZ) waveform in FIG. 7 is one example of an output of a half-wave detector circuit, while the Full-wave waveform is one example of an output of a full-wave detector circuit. In some embodiments, both such outputs are low-pass filtered to aid in reconstituting the detected waveform and eliminating spurious signal artifacts. Each waveform may then be sampled in the center of the data interval, as illustrated by the vertical hash marks.



FIG. 8A is a block diagram illustrating a conventional multiple PLL approach to generating the necessary receive clocks for an embodiment such as shown in FIG. 1. Using information obtained directly or indirectly from the received data (which may include transmitted clocks via dedicated wires, a dedicated sub-channel, and/or enhanced edge transition density, eye width or edge measurement, etc.) appropriately-timed sampling clocks are generated to permit optimum sampling of detected baseband data. This is commonly known as Clock-Data Alignment or Clock-Data Recovery (CDA or CDR). In common embodiments, a PLL configuration is used in which a phase detector controls a Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO) so as to generate a local clock signal having the desired characteristics.


Separately, an independent PLL configuration generates a local clock signal aligned to the carrier frequency of the received carrier-demodulated data, and a sampling clock suitable for optimum sampling of carrier-demodulated data.


In an alternative embodiment, one or more of the necessary local clock signals may be derived from another clock signal. FIG. 8B illustrates a local clock signal created using a PLL locked to a reference derived from the Baseband Data. This may be facilitated by, as representative examples, the Baseband data incorporating a dedicated clock signal, or being augmented by a guaranteed density of edge transitions. This well-controlled and stable local clock may then be used to generate other local clock signals, either by well-known frequency division or multiplication (e.g., using frequency multiplier 160 of FIG. 1), or simply by adjusting the relative phase of the derived clock using a phase interpolator or adjustable delay element (e.g., using offset correction element 140). For example, the local clock signal derived from baseband data may have the same frequency as the carrier frequency, and may thus be phase-adjusted using a phase detector and phase interpolator to generate the demodulation signal. Further, if the data rate of the demodulated sub-channel data is equal to the data rate of the baseband data, the clock derived from the baseband data may drive generation of the sampling clock for the demodulated sub-channel data, and may be phase-shifted accordingly. In some embodiments, the carrier frequency is different than the data rate of the baseband data, and thus the sampling clock generated from the baseband data may be multiplied/divided (not shown) to generate a demodulation signal having the carrier frequency (as is the case shown in FIG. 1). The demodulation signal may then be phase-detected and phase-shifted to be aligned to the carrier-modulated symbols. FIG. 8B shows two such derived clocks, each being phase-adjusted by a separate phase detector and phase interpolator. In some embodiments, the phase-adjustments are made to compensate for differences in the signal paths for the baseband/carrier signals, as they undergo different filtering, etc.


In some embodiments, hybrid clock generation embodiments are also possible, including embodiments utilizing secondary or slave PLLs that produce a second local clock that is derived from a first local clock generated as described above. In such a system configuration, the secondary PLL may have different lock characteristics than the primary PLL, allowing independent optimization of characteristics such as lock time, free-running drift, jitter, etc.



FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a method 900, in accordance with some embodiments. As shown, method 900 includes obtaining 902 a set of carrier-modulated symbols of a carrier-modulated codeword, each carrier-modulated symbol received via a respective wire of a plurality of wires of a multi-wire bus. Each carrier-modulated symbol of the set of carrier-modulated symbols is applied 904 to a corresponding transistor of a set of transistors, the set of transistors connected to a pair of output nodes according to a sub-channel vector of a plurality of sub-channel vectors. A demodulation signal CK_d is recovered 906 from the set of carrier-modulated symbols. A demodulated sub-channel data output is generated 908 as a differential voltage on the pair of output nodes based on a linear combination of the set of carrier-modulated symbols by controlling a conductivity of the set of transistors according to the demodulation signal CK_d.


In some embodiments, controlling the conductivity of the set of transistors includes selectably enabling a current source according to the demodulation signal CK_d, as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. In such embodiments, the demodulated sub-channel data output is a return-to-zero (RTZ) signal, as illustrated in FIG. 7.


In some embodiments, controlling the conductivity further includes alternately connecting each transistor of the set of transistors between the pair of output nodes according to the demodulation signal. In such embodiments, each transistor circuit is alternately connected between the pair of output nodes using a respective differential pair of transistors connected to the pair of output nodes according to the sub-channel vector. In some embodiments, the respective differential pair of transistors receives the demodulation signal and a complement of the demodulation signal and is composed of same-type transistors (e.g., NMOS or PMOS only), while alternative embodiments may include differential pairs of transistors that include an NMOS and a PMOS transistor both receiving the demodulation signal CK_d. Such a configuration is illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6, as the differential pairs receiving the demodulation signal CK_d+ and a complement of the demodulation signal CK_d− alternate the connection of the corresponding transistor connected to the carrier-modulated symbols between each output node in accordance with the polarity of the carrier-modulated symbols.


In some embodiments, the conductivity of each transistor of the set of transistors is further controlled by a symbol value of the applied carrier-modulated symbol. In such embodiments, the amount of current drawn through each transistor is proportional to the symbol value applied at each transistor. Signal amplitudes in one particular embodiment are:


500 mV center,


500+180=680 mV (+1)


500−60=440 mV (−1/3)


500−60=440 mV (−1/3)


500−60=440 mV (−1/3)


where a symbol of magnitude ‘1’ corresponds to a 180 mV deviation from the 500 mV center voltage and a symbol of magnitude ‘1/3’ corresponds to a 60 mV deviation from the 500 mV center voltage.


In some embodiments, the method further includes pre-charging the pair of output nodes in response to a sampling clock, and wherein the conductivity of the set of transistors is further controlled according to the sampling clock. Such embodiments are referred to above as “discrete” or “dynamic” MIC-demodulation circuits.


In some embodiments, the differential voltage on the pair of output nodes is formed by drawing currents through impedance elements connected to the pair of output nodes. In some embodiments, the impedance elements may be resistors connected between a power supply and the pair of output nodes to control a voltage drop across the resistors. The differential amount of current drawn through the resistors will form a differential voltage output on the pair of output nodes.


In some embodiments, the method further includes low-pass filtering the demodulated sub-channel data output.


In some embodiments, obtaining the set of carrier-modulated symbols includes high-pass filtering a superposition codeword comprising the set of carrier-modulated symbols of the carrier-modulated codeword and a set of baseband symbols of a baseband codeword.


In some embodiments, the sub-channel vector is part of a plurality of mutually orthogonal sub-channel vectors that compose rows of an orthogonal matrix. In some such embodiments, the orthogonal matrix is a Hadamard matrix.


In some embodiments, the demodulation signal has an equal rate as a sampling clock associated with a baud rate of the data streams. In alternative embodiments, the demodulation signal has a differing rate than the sampling clock. In some such embodiments, the demodulation signal may be an integer multiple of the sampling clock, and may initiate multiple discharge periods in a single unit interval. Alternatively, the demodulation signal may be a fraction of the sampling clock. In such embodiments, the sampling clock may initiate multiple pre-charge/discharge cycles in a half cycle of the demodulation signal. In some embodiments, the demodulation signal is generated by multiplying the sampling clock using a frequency multiplier. Alternatively, the demodulation signal may be generated by dividing the sampling clock using a frequency divider.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: obtaining a baseband clock signal;receiving wire signals over a multi-wire bus, the wire signals comprising a superposition of a set of baseband symbols and a set of carrier-modulated symbols;sampling, using the baseband clock signal, a set of baseband sub-channel outputs generated from combining the set of baseband symbols;deriving a phase-adjusted demodulation signal from the baseband clock signal, the phase-adjusted demodulation signal having a frequency equal to a carrier frequency associated with the set of carrier-modulated symbols;generating a set of demodulated sub-channel outputs by synchronously forming linear combinations of the set of carrier-modulated symbols responsive to the phase-adjusted demodulation signal;generating a carrier band data sampling clock signal by phase-adjusting the baseband clock signal according to the set of demodulated sub-channel outputs; andsampling the set of demodulated sub-channel outputs using the carrier band data sampling clock signal.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the baseband clock signal is obtained from a dedicated pair of clock wires of the multi-wire bus.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of baseband sub-channel outputs comprises a dedicated clock sub-channel output that is orthogonal to a plurality of data sub-channel outputs, and wherein the baseband clock signal is derived from the dedicated clock sub-channel output.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining the baseband clock signal comprises detecting signal transitions in the set of baseband sub-channel outputs.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the baseband sub-channel outputs are encoded to maintain a guaranteed minimum transition density.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein deriving the phase-adjusted demodulation signal from the baseband clock signal comprises frequency-multiplying the baseband clock signal to achieve the frequency equal to the carrier frequency associated with the set of carrier-modulated symbols.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein deriving the phase-adjusted demodulation signal from the baseband clock signal comprises frequency-dividing the baseband clock signal to achieve the frequency equal to the carrier frequency associated with the set of carrier-modulated symbols.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein deriving the phase-adjusted demodulation signal comprises phase-adjusting the baseband clock signal to be aligned to the set of carrier-modulated symbols.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein generating each demodulated sub-channel output of the set of demodulated sub-channel outputs comprises generating a differential voltage on a pair of output nodes based on a differential current formed from the linear combination of the set of carrier-modulated symbols, the differential current selectively enabled according to the phase-adjusted demodulation signal.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein each linear combination of the set of carrier-modulated symbols is mutually orthogonal.
  • 11. An apparatus comprising: a set of multi-input comparators (MICs) configured to receive wire signals in parallel over a multi-wire bus, the wire signals comprising a superposition of a set of baseband symbols and a set of carrier-modulated symbols, the set of multi-input comparators comprising: a set of baseband MICs configured to generate a set of baseband sub-channel outputs by combining the set of baseband symbols; anda set of demodulation MICs configured to generate a set of demodulated sub-channel outputs by synchronously forming linear combinations of the set of carrier-modulated symbols responsive to a phase-adjusted demodulation signal;a clock recovery circuit comprising: a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) configured to generate a baseband clock signal;a first phase-locked loop (PLL) configured to generate the phase-adjusted demodulation signal from the baseband clock signal, the phase-adjusted demodulation signal having a frequency equal to a carrier frequency associated with a set of carrier-modulated symbols; anda second PLL configured to generate a carrier band data sampling clock signal by phase-adjusting the baseband clock signal according to the set of demodulated sub-channel outputs;a plurality of samplers configured to sample the set of baseband sub-channel outputs and the set of demodulated sub-channel outputs according to the baseband clock signal and the carrier band data sampling clock signal, respectively.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the VCO is configured to generate the baseband clock signal based on a forwarded clock signal received over a dedicated pair of clock wires of the multi-wire bus.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the set of baseband sub-channel outputs comprises a dedicated clock sub-channel output that is orthogonal to a plurality of data sub-channel outputs, and wherein the VCO is configured to generate the baseband clock signal based on the dedicated clock sub-channel output.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the VCO is configured to generate the baseband clock signal based on signal transitions in the set of baseband sub-channel outputs.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the baseband sub-channel outputs are encoded to maintain a guaranteed minimum transition density.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the clock recovery circuit further comprises a frequency-multiplier configured to frequency-multiply the baseband clock signal to have the frequency equal to the carrier frequency associated with the set of carrier-modulated symbols.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the clock recovery circuit further comprises a frequency-divider configured to frequency-divide the baseband clock signal to have the frequency equal to the carrier frequency associated with the set of carrier-modulated symbols.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the first PLL is configured to generate the phase-adjusted demodulation signal by phase-adjusting the baseband clock signal to be aligned to the set of carrier-modulated symbols.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein each demodulation MIC is configured to generate a respective demodulated sub-channel output of the set of demodulated sub-channel outputs by generating a differential voltage on a pair of output nodes based on a differential current formed from the linear combination of the set of carrier-modulated symbols, the differential current selectively enabled according to the phase-adjusted demodulation signal.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein each linear combination of the set of carrier-modulated symbols is mutually orthogonal.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/909,529, filed Jun. 23, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,063,799, naming Armin Tajalli, entitled “Synchronously-Switched Multi-Input Demodulating Comparator”, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/236,012, filed Dec. 28, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,693,688, naming Armin Taj alli, entitled “Synchronously-Switched Multi-Input Demodulating Comparator”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/611,523, filed Dec. 28, 2017, naming Armin Tajalli, entitled “Combined Multi-Input Comparator and Demodulator”, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes. The following references are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes: U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0268225 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/784,414, filed May 20, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,288,089, granted Mar. 15, 2016, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling”, hereinafter identified as [Cronie I]; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/030,027, filed Feb. 17, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,649,445, granted Feb. 11, 2014, naming Harm Cronie, Amin Shokrollahi and Armin Tajalli, entitled “Methods and Systems for Noise Resilient, Pin-Efficient and Low Power Communications with Sparse Signaling Codes”, hereinafter identified as [Cronie II]; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/158,452, filed Jan. 17, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,124,557, granted Sep. 1, 2015, naming John Fox, Brian Holden, Peter Hunt, John D Keay, Amin Shokrollahi, Richard Simpson, Anant Singh, Andrew Kevin John Stewart, and Giuseppe Surace, entitled “Chip-to-Chip Communication with Reduced SSO Noise”, hereinafter identified as [Fox I]; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/842,740, filed Mar. 15, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,300,503, granted Mar. 29, 2016, naming Brian Holden, Amin Shokrollahi and Anant Singh, entitled “Methods and Systems for Skew Tolerance in and Advanced Detectors for Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communication”, hereinafter identified as [Holden I]; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/934,804, filed Feb. 2, 2014, now U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/612,241, filed Feb. 2, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,100,232, granted Aug. 6, 2015, naming Ali Hormati and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Methods for Code Evaluation Using ISI Ratio”, hereinafter identified as [Hormati I]; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/026,860, filed Jul. 21, 2014, now U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/803,996, filed Jul. 20, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,444,654, granted Sep. 13, 2016, naming Ali Hormati and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Multidrop Data Transfer”, hereinafter identified as [Hormati II]; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/194,497, filed Jun. 27, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,832,046, granted Nov. 28, 2017, naming Ali Hormati, Armin Tajalli, and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Method and Apparatus for High-Speed Chip-to-Chip Communications”, hereinafter identified as [Hormati III]; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/802,365, filed Nov. 2, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,347,283, granted Jul. 9, 2019, naming Ali Hormati and Armin Tajalli, entitled “Clock Data Recovery in Multilane Data Receiver”, hereinafter identified as [Hormati IV]. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/934,807, filed Feb. 2, 2014, now U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/612,252, filed Feb. 2, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,479,369, granted Oct. 25, 2016, naming Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Vector Signaling Codes with High pin-efficiency and their Application to Chip-to-Chip Communications and Storage”, hereinafter identified as [Shokrollahi I]; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/839,360, filed Jun. 23, 2013, now U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/313,966, filed Jun. 24, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,246,713, granted Jan. 26, 2016, naming Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Vector Signaling Codes with Reduced Receiver Complexity”, hereinafter identified as [Shokrollahi II]. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/946,574, filed Feb. 28, 2014, now U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/636,098, filed Mar. 2, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,363,114, granted Jun. 7, 2016, naming Amin Shokrollahi, Brian Holden, and Richard Simpson, entitled “Clock Embedded Vector Signaling Codes”, hereinafter identified as [Shokrollahi III]. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/015,172, filed Jul. 10, 2014, now U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/746,477, filed Jun. 22, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,852,806, granted Dec. 26, 2017, naming Amin Shokrollahi and Roger Ulrich, entitled “Vector Signaling Codes with Increased Signal to Noise Characteristics”, hereinafter identified as [Shokrollahi IV]. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/895,206, filed May 15, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,288,082, granted Mar. 15, 2016, naming Roger Ulrich and Peter Hunt, entitled “Circuits for Efficient Detection of Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communications using Sums of Differences”, hereinafter identified as [Ulrich I]. “Controlled Intersymbol Interference Design Techniques of Conventional Interconnection Systems for Data Rates beyond 20 Gbps”, Wendemagegnehu T. Beyene and Amir Amirkhany, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, Vol. 31 No. 4, pg. 731-740, November 2008, hereinafter identified as [Beyene].

US Referenced Citations (253)
Number Name Date Kind
3196351 David Jul 1965 A
3970795 Allen Jul 1976 A
4163258 Ebihara et al. Jul 1979 A
4181967 Linford et al. Jan 1980 A
4206316 Bancroft et al. Jun 1980 A
4414512 Nelson Nov 1983 A
4499550 Ray et al. Feb 1985 A
5053974 Penz Oct 1991 A
5150384 Cahill Sep 1992 A
5166956 Baltus et al. Nov 1992 A
5168509 Nakamura et al. Dec 1992 A
5311516 Kuznicki et al. May 1994 A
5331320 Cideciyan et al. Jul 1994 A
5388126 Rypinski et al. Feb 1995 A
5412689 Chan et al. May 1995 A
5449895 Hecht et al. Sep 1995 A
5553097 Dagher Sep 1996 A
5659353 Kostreski et al. Aug 1997 A
5727006 Dreyer et al. Mar 1998 A
5856935 Moy et al. Jan 1999 A
5982954 Delen et al. Nov 1999 A
6005895 Perino et al. Dec 1999 A
6084883 Norrell et al. Jul 2000 A
6084958 Blossom Jul 2000 A
6097732 Jung Aug 2000 A
6111895 Miller et al. Aug 2000 A
6154498 Dabral et al. Nov 2000 A
6226330 Mansur May 2001 B1
6278740 Nordyke Aug 2001 B1
6317465 Akamatsu et al. Nov 2001 B1
6359931 Perino et al. Mar 2002 B1
6417737 Moloudi et al. Jul 2002 B1
6452420 Wong Sep 2002 B1
6483828 Balachandran et al. Nov 2002 B1
6504875 Perino et al. Jan 2003 B2
6522699 Anderson et al. Feb 2003 B1
6556628 Poulton et al. Apr 2003 B1
6621427 Greenstreet Sep 2003 B2
6621945 Bissessur Sep 2003 B2
6650638 Walker et al. Nov 2003 B1
6650699 Tierno Nov 2003 B1
6658234 Dogan Dec 2003 B1
6661355 Cornelius et al. Dec 2003 B2
6686879 Shattil Feb 2004 B2
6766342 Kechriotis Jul 2004 B2
6839429 Gaikwad et al. Jan 2005 B1
6842489 Masenten Jan 2005 B2
6865236 Terry Mar 2005 B1
6876317 Sankaran Apr 2005 B2
6898724 Chang May 2005 B2
6954492 Williams Oct 2005 B1
6963622 Eroz et al. Nov 2005 B2
6990138 Bejjani et al. Jan 2006 B2
6993311 Li et al. Jan 2006 B2
6999516 Rajan Feb 2006 B1
7023817 Kuffner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7039136 Olson et al. May 2006 B2
7072387 Betts Jul 2006 B1
7075996 Simon et al. Jul 2006 B2
7120198 Dafesh et al. Oct 2006 B1
7127003 Rajan et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142612 Horowitz et al. Nov 2006 B2
7167523 Mansur Jan 2007 B2
7180949 Kleveland et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184483 Rajan Feb 2007 B2
7269212 Chau et al. Sep 2007 B1
7349484 Stojanovic et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356213 Cunningham et al. Apr 2008 B1
7358869 Chiarulli et al. Apr 2008 B1
7428273 Foster Sep 2008 B2
7496130 Rumney Feb 2009 B2
7496162 Srebranig Feb 2009 B2
7599390 Pamarti Oct 2009 B2
7633850 Ahn Dec 2009 B2
7639596 Cioffi Dec 2009 B2
7643588 Visalli et al. Jan 2010 B2
7656321 Wang Feb 2010 B2
7706456 Laroia et al. Apr 2010 B2
7746764 Rawlins et al. Jun 2010 B2
7787572 Scharf et al. Aug 2010 B2
7808883 Green Oct 2010 B2
7868790 Bae Jan 2011 B2
7869546 Tsai Jan 2011 B2
7899653 Hollis Mar 2011 B2
7907676 Stojanovic et al. Mar 2011 B2
8050332 Chung et al. Nov 2011 B2
8055095 Palotai et al. Nov 2011 B2
8149906 Saito et al. Apr 2012 B2
8159375 Abbasfar Apr 2012 B2
8159376 Abbasfar Apr 2012 B2
8199849 Oh et al. Jun 2012 B2
8199863 Chen et al. Jun 2012 B2
8218670 Abou Jul 2012 B2
8238318 Negus Aug 2012 B1
8245094 Jiang et al. Aug 2012 B2
8279745 Dent Oct 2012 B2
8279976 Lin et al. Oct 2012 B2
8284848 Nam et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289914 Li et al. Oct 2012 B2
8295250 Gorokhov et al. Oct 2012 B2
8365035 Hara Jan 2013 B2
8406316 Sugita et al. Mar 2013 B2
8457261 Shi et al. Jun 2013 B1
8472513 Malipatil et al. Jun 2013 B2
8498368 Husted et al. Jul 2013 B1
8520493 Goulahsen Aug 2013 B2
8539318 Shokrollahi et al. Sep 2013 B2
8577284 Seo et al. Nov 2013 B2
8588254 Diab et al. Nov 2013 B2
8588280 Oh et al. Nov 2013 B2
8593305 Tajalli et al. Nov 2013 B1
8620166 Guha Dec 2013 B2
8644497 Clausen et al. Feb 2014 B2
8649445 Cronie et al. Feb 2014 B2
8687968 Nosaka et al. Apr 2014 B2
8718184 Cronie et al. May 2014 B1
8731039 Sarrigeorgidis et al. May 2014 B1
8755426 Cronie et al. Jun 2014 B1
8773964 Hsueh et al. Jul 2014 B2
8780687 Clausen et al. Jul 2014 B2
8792594 Vojcic et al. Jul 2014 B2
8831440 Yu et al. Sep 2014 B2
8879660 Peng et al. Nov 2014 B1
8938171 Tang et al. Jan 2015 B2
8949693 Ordentlich et al. Feb 2015 B2
8989317 Holden et al. Mar 2015 B1
8996740 Wiley et al. Mar 2015 B2
9015566 Cronie et al. Apr 2015 B2
9020049 Schwager et al. Apr 2015 B2
9071476 Fox et al. Jun 2015 B2
9077386 Holden et al. Jul 2015 B1
9100232 Hormati et al. Aug 2015 B1
9124557 Fox et al. Sep 2015 B2
9197470 Okunev Nov 2015 B2
9246713 Shokrollahi Jan 2016 B2
9251873 Fox et al. Feb 2016 B1
9288082 Ulrich et al. Mar 2016 B1
9288089 Cronie et al. Mar 2016 B2
9300503 Holden et al. Mar 2016 B1
9331962 Lida et al. May 2016 B2
9362974 Fox et al. Jun 2016 B2
9363114 Shokrollahi et al. Jun 2016 B2
9401828 Cronie et al. Jul 2016 B2
9432082 Ulrich et al. Aug 2016 B2
9444654 Hormati et al. Sep 2016 B2
9461862 Holden et al. Oct 2016 B2
9479369 Shokrollahi Oct 2016 B1
9509437 Shokrollahi Nov 2016 B2
9537644 Jones et al. Jan 2017 B2
9634797 Benammar et al. Apr 2017 B2
9667379 Cronie et al. May 2017 B2
9710412 Sengoku Jul 2017 B2
9825723 Holden et al. Nov 2017 B2
9852806 Stauffer et al. Dec 2017 B2
10055372 Shokrollahi Aug 2018 B2
10243614 Ulrich et al. Mar 2019 B1
10347283 Hormati et al. Jul 2019 B2
20010006538 Simon et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010055294 Motoyoshi Dec 2001 A1
20020034191 Shattil Mar 2002 A1
20020044316 Myers Apr 2002 A1
20020097791 Hansen Jul 2002 A1
20020152340 Dreps et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020174373 Chang Nov 2002 A1
20020181607 Izumi Dec 2002 A1
20030071684 Noori Apr 2003 A1
20030086366 Branlund et al. May 2003 A1
20030087634 Raghavan et al. May 2003 A1
20040057525 Rajan et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040146117 Subramaniam et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040155802 Lamy et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040161019 Raghavan et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040203834 Mahany Oct 2004 A1
20040239374 Hori Dec 2004 A1
20050063493 Foster Mar 2005 A1
20050213686 Love et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060013331 Choi et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060120486 Visalli et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060126751 Bessios Jun 2006 A1
20060133538 Stojanovic et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060159005 Rawlins et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060251421 Arnon Nov 2006 A1
20060274862 Lui et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060291589 Eliezer et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070030796 Green Feb 2007 A1
20070070967 Yang et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070097579 Amamiya May 2007 A1
20080043677 Kim et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080104374 Mohamed May 2008 A1
20080192621 Suehiro Aug 2008 A1
20080316070 Van et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090046009 Fujii Feb 2009 A1
20090059782 Cole Mar 2009 A1
20090110106 Wornell et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090154604 Lee et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090163162 Hoffman et al. Jun 2009 A1
20100046644 Mazet Feb 2010 A1
20100054355 Kinjo et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100081451 Mueck et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100215087 Tsai Aug 2010 A1
20100215112 Tsai et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100235673 Abbasfar Sep 2010 A1
20100296556 Rave et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100309964 Oh et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110014865 Seo et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110018749 Muto et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110122767 Dent May 2011 A1
20110134678 Sato et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110228864 Aryanfar et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110235501 Goulahsen Sep 2011 A1
20110255714 Neusinger Oct 2011 A1
20110268225 Cronie et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110286497 Nervig Nov 2011 A1
20110299555 Cronie et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110302478 Cronie et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120161945 Single et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120213299 Cronie et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120257683 Schwager et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130010892 Cronie et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130013870 Cronie et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130114392 Sun et al. May 2013 A1
20130129019 Sorrells et al. May 2013 A1
20130202001 Zhang Aug 2013 A1
20130259113 Kumar Oct 2013 A1
20140177645 Cronie et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140254642 Fox et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150078479 Whitby-Strevens Mar 2015 A1
20150222458 Hormati et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150236885 Ling et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150249559 Shokrollahi et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150280841 Gudovskiy et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150333940 Shokrollahi Nov 2015 A1
20150349835 Fox et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150365263 Zhang et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150380087 Mittelholzer et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150381768 Fox et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160020824 Ulrich et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160036616 Holden et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160211929 Holden et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160218894 Fox et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160338040 Lee et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160373141 Chou et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160380787 Hormati et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170195961 Chakraborty et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170272285 Shokrollahi et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170302237 Akter et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170353205 Chakraborty et al. Dec 2017 A1
20190103903 Yang Apr 2019 A1
20190221153 Tsuchi et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190238379 Walk et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190245560 Yang et al. Aug 2019 A1
20200321778 Gharibdoust et al. Oct 2020 A1
20210297292 Hormati Sep 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
1864346 Nov 2006 CN
101854223 Oct 2010 CN
2003163612 Jun 2003 JP
4394755 Oct 2009 JP
2005032000 Apr 2005 WO
2009084121 Jul 2009 WO
2010031824 Mar 2010 WO
2019241081 Dec 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (21)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US18/67994, dated Apr. 3, 2019, 1-10 (10 pages).
Abbasfar, Aliazam , “Generalized Differential Vector Signaling”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC '09, Jun. 14, 2009, 1-5 (5 pages).
Anonymous , “Constant-weight code”, Wikipedia.org, retrieved on Feb. 6, 2017, (3 pages).
Counts, Lew , et al., “One-Chip “Slide Rule” Works with Logs, Antilogs for Real-Time Processing”, Analog Devices, Computational Products 6, Reprinted from Electronic Design, May 2, 1985, 3-9 (7 pages).
Dasilva, Victor , et al., “Multicarrier Orthogonal CDMA Signals for Quasi-Synchronous Communication Systems”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 12, No. 5, Jun. 1994, 842-852 (11 pages).
Farzan, Kamran , et al., “Coding Schemes for Chip-to-Chip Interconnect Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 14, No. 4, Apr. 2006, 393-406 (14 pages).
Giovaneli, Carlos Lopez, et al., “Space-Frequency Coded OFDM System for Multi-Wire Power Line Communications”, Power Line Communications and Its Applications, 2005 International Symposium on Vancouver, BC, Canada, IEEE XP-002433844, Apr. 6-8, 2005, 191-195 (5 pages).
Healey, Adam , et al., “A Comparison of 25 Gbps NRZ & PAM-4 Modulation used in Legacy & Premium Backplane Channels”, Tyco Electronics Corporation, DesignCon 2012, Jan. 2012, 1-16 (16 pages).
Holden, Brian , “An exploration of the technical feasibility of the major technology options for 400GE backplanes”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, Geneva, CH, Jul. 16, 2013, 1-18 (18 pages).
Holden, Brian , “Simulation results for NRZ, ENRZ & PAM-4 on 16-wire full-sized 400GE backplanes”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, York, UK, Sep. 2, 2013, 1-19 (19 pages).
Holden, Brian , “Using Ensemble NRZ Coding for 400GE Electrical Interfaces”, IEEE 802.3 400GE Study Group, May 17, 2013, 1-24 (24 pages).
Jiang, Anxiao , et al., “Rank Modulation for Flash Memories”, IEEE Transactions of Information Theory, vol. 55, No. 6, Jun. 2009, 2659-2673 (16 pages).
Oh, Dan , et al., “Pseudo-Differential Vector Signaling for Noise Reduction in Single-Ended Signaling Systems”, DesignCon 2009, Rambus Inc., Jan. 2009, (22 pages).
Poulton, John , “Multiwire Differential Signaling”, UNC-CH Department of Computer Science Version 1.1, Aug. 6, 2003, 1-20 (20 pages).
She, James , et al., “A Framework of Cross-Layer Superposition Coded Multicast for Robust IPTV Services over WiMAX”, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Apr. 15, 2008, 3139-3144 (6 pages).
Skliar, Osvaldo , et al., “A Method For the Analysis of Signals: the Square-Wave Method”, Revista de Matematica: Teoria y Aplicationes, vol. 15, No. 2, Mar. 2008, 109-129 (21 pages).
Slepian, David , “Permutation Modulation”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 53, No. 3, Mar. 1965, 228-236 (9 pages).
Wada, Tadahiro , et al., “A Study on Orthogonal Multi-Code CDMA Systems Using Constant Amplitude Coding”, Technical Report of IEICE, vol. 97, No. 132, Jun. 24, 1997, 19-24 (6 pages).
Wang, Xin , et al., “Applying CDMA Technique to Network-on-Chip”, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 15, No. 10, Oct. 1, 2007, 1091-1100 (10 pages).
Wendemagegnehu, T. Beyene , et al., “Controlled Intersymbol Interference Design Techniques of Conventional Interconnection Systems for Data Rates beyond 20 Gbps”, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, vol. 31, No. 4, Nov. 2008, 731-740 (11 pages).
Penttinen, Jyrki , et al., “Performance Model for Orthogonal Sub Channel in Noise-limited Environment”, Sixth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications, 2010, 56-61 (6 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210336824 A1 Oct 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62611523 Dec 2017 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16909529 Jun 2020 US
Child 17367392 US
Parent 16236012 Dec 2018 US
Child 16909529 US