Synergistic mixtures for fungal control in cereals

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11771085
  • Patent Number
    11,771,085
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 2, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 3, 2023
    7 months ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • CPC
    • A01N43/40
    • A01N43/653
  • International Classifications
    • A01N43/40
    • A01N43/653
    • Disclaimer
      This patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer.
      Term Extension
      291
Abstract
A fungicidal composition containing a fungicidally effective amount of the compound of Formula I, (S)-1,1-bis(4-fluorophenyl)propan-2-yl (3-acetoxy-4-methoxypicolinoyl)-L-alaninate, and at least one fungicide selected from the group consisting of tebuconazole, prothioconazole, difenconazole, epoxiconazole, mefentrifluconazole, benzovindiflupyr, penthiopyrad, fluxapyroxad, bixafen, fluopyram, picoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, azoxystrobin, mancozeb and chlorothalonil, provides synergistic control of selected fungi.
Description
FIELD

This disclosure concerns a synergistic fungicidal composition containing (a) the compound of Formula I and (b) at least one fungicide selected from the group consisting of a sterol biosynthesis-inhibitor, for example prothioconazole, epoxiconazole, cyproconazole, myclobutanil, metconazole, mefentrifluconazole, difenoconazole, tebuconazole, tetraconazole, fenbuconazole, propiconazole, fluquinconazole, flusilazole, flutriafol, fenpropimorph, and prochloraz; a succinate dehydrogenase-inhibitor, for example fluxapyroxad, benzovindiflupyr, penthiopyrad, isopyrazam, bixafen, boscalid, penflufen, and fluopyram; a strobilurin, for example pyraclostrobin, fluoxastrobin, azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin, picoxystrobin, and kresoxim methyl; and a multi-site-inhibitor, for example mancozeb and chlorothalonil, or other commercial fungicides to provide control of any plant fungal pathogen.


BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY

Fungicides are compounds, of natural or synthetic origin, which act to protect plants against damage caused by fungi. Current methods of agriculture rely heavily on the use of fungicides. In fact, some crops cannot be grown usefully without the use of fungicides. Using fungicides allows a grower to increase the yield and the quality of the crop, and consequently, increase the value of the crop. In most situations, the increase in value of the crop is worth at least three times the cost of the use of the fungicide.


However, no one fungicide is useful in all situations and repeated usage of a single fungicide frequently leads to the development of resistance to that and related fungicides. Consequently, research is being conducted to produce fungicides and combinations of fungicides that are safer, that have better performance, that require lower dosages, that are easier to use, and that cost less.


Synergism occurs when the activity of two or more compounds exceeds the activities of the compounds when used alone.


It is an object of this disclosure to provide synergistic compositions comprising fungicidal compounds. It is a further object of this disclosure to provide processes that use these synergistic compositions. The synergistic compositions are capable of preventing or curing, or both, diseases caused by fungi of the classes Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes. In addition, the synergistic compositions have improved efficacy against the Ascomycete and Basidiomycete pathogens, including leaf blotch and brown rust of wheat. In accordance with this disclosure, synergistic compositions are provided along with methods for their use.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure concerns a synergistic fungicidal mixture comprising a fungicidally effective amount of (a) the compound of Formula I and (b) at least one fungicide selected from the compounds of the following groups A.1, B.1 and C.1:


A.1 Sterol biosynthesis inhibitors (SBI fungicides) selected from the following groups a), b) and c):


a) C14 demethylase inhibitors (DMI fungicides), for example prothioconazole, epoxiconazole, cyproconazole, myclobutanil, metconazole, mefentrifluconazole, difenoconazole, tebuconazole, tetraconazole, fenbuconazole, propiconazole, fluquinconazole, flusilazole, flutriafol and prochloraz;


b) Delta 14-reductase inhibitors, for example, fenpropimorph and aldimorph;


c) Inhibitors of 3-keto reductase such as fenhexamid;


B.1 Respiration inhibitors selected from the following groups a) and b):


a) inhibitors of complex II (SDHI fungicides, e.g. carboxamides), for example fluxapyroxad, benzovindiflupyr, penthiopyrad, isopyrazam, bixafen, boscalid, penflufen, and fluopyram;


b) inhibitors of complex III at the Qo site (e.g. strobilurins), for example pyraclostrobin, fluoxastrobin, azoxystrobin, trifloxystrobin, picoxystrobin, and kresoxim methyl;


C.1 Inhibitors with multi-site action selected from the following groups a) and b):


a) thio- and dithiocarbamates, such as mancozeb;


b) organochlorine compounds (e.g. phthalimides, sulfamides, chloronitriles) such as chlorothalonil;


or other commercial fungicides to provide control of any plant fungal pathogen.




embedded image


As used herein, the compound of Formula I is (S)-1,1-bis(4-fluorophenyl)propan-2-yl (3-acetoxy-4-methoxypicolinoyl)-L-alaninate. The compound of Formula I provides control of a variety of pathogens in economically important crops including, but not limited to, the causal agent of leaf blotch in wheat, Zymoseptoria tritici (SEPTTR).


As used herein, epoxiconazole is the common name for (2RS,3SR)-1-[3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2,3-epoxy-2-(4-fluorophenyl)propyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in The Pesticide Manual, Fifteenth Edition, 2009. Epoxiconazole provides broad spectrum control, with preventive and curative action, of diseases caused by Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes and Deuteromycetes in bananas, cereals, coffee, rice and sugar beet.


As used herein, prothioconazole is the common name for 2-[(2RS)-2-(1-chlorocyclopropyl)-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxypropyl]-2H-1,2,4-triazole-3 (4H)-thione and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in The Pesticide Manual, Fifteenth Edition, 2009. Prothioconazole provides control of diseases such as eyespot (Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides), Fusarium ear blight (Fusarium spp., Microdochium nivale), leaf blotch diseases (Zymoseptoria tritici, Parastagonospora nodorum, Pyrenophora spp., Rhynchosporium secalis, etc.), rust (Puccinia spp.) and powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis), by foliar application, in wheat, barley and other crops.


As used herein, difenoconazole is the common name for 3-chloro-4-[(2RS, 4RS,2RS,4RS)-4-methyl-2-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]phenyl 4-chlorophenyl ether and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in BCPC Online Pesticide Manual—Latest Version. Difenoconazole provides broad spectrum control, with preventive and curative action, of diseases caused by Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes and Deuteromycetes in grapes, pome fruit, stone fruit, potatoes, sugar beet, oilseed rape, bananas, cereals, rice, soybeans, ornamentals and various vegetable crops.


As used herein, tebuconazole is the common name for (RS)-1-p-chlorophenyl-4,4-dimethyl-3-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-2-ylmethyl)pentan-3-ol and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in BCPC Online Pesticide Manual—Latest Version. Tebuconazole provides control of a broad range of diseases on a variety of crops. For example, on cereals it controls diseases caused by Puccinia spp., Erysiphe graminis, Rhynchosporium secalis, Septoria spp., Pyrenophora spp., Cochliobolus sativus and Fusarium spp., and in peanuts it controls diseases caused by Mycosphaerella spp., Puccinia arachidis and Sclerotium rolfsii. Other uses are in bananas, against Mycosphaerella fijiensis; in oilseed rape, against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Alternaria spp., Leptosphaeria maculans, and Pyrenopeziza brassicae; in tea, against Exobasidium vexans; in soybeans, against Phakopsora pachyrhizi; in pome and stone fruit, against Monilinia spp., Podosphaera leucotricha, Sphaerotheca pannosa, and Venturia spp.; in grapevines, against Uncinula necator; in coffee, against Hemileia vastatrix, Cercospora coffeicola and Mycena citricolor; in bulb vegetables, against Sclerotium cepivorum and Alternaria porri; in beans, against Phaeoisariopsis griseola; and in tomatoes and potatoes, against Alternaria solani.


As used herein, picoxystrobin is the common name for methyl (E)-3-methoxy-2-[2-(6-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridyloxymethyl)phenyl]acrylate and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in The e-Pesticide Manual, Version 5.2, 2011. Exemplary uses of picoxystrobin include, but are not limited to, broad-spectrum disease control in cereals, including Mycosphaerella graminicola, Phaeosphaeria nodorum, Puccinia recondita (brown rust), Helminthosporium tritici-repentis (tan spot) and Blumeria graminis fsp. tritici (strobilurin-sensitive powdery mildew) in wheat; Helminthosporium teres (net blotch), Rhynchosporium secalis, Puccinia horde/(brown rust) and Erysiphe graminis fsp. horde/(strobilurin-sensitive powdery mildew) in barley; Puccinia coronata and Helminthosporium avenae in oats; and Puccinia recondita and Rhynchosporium secalis in rye.


As used herein, azoxystrobin is the common name for (E)-2-{2-[6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-yloxy]phenyl}-3-methoxyacrylate and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is exemplified in The e-Pesticide Manual, Version 5.2, 2011. Exemplary uses of azoxystrobin include, but are not limited to, control of the following pathogens: Erysiphe graminis, Puccinia spp., Parastagonospora nodorum, Zymoseptoria tritici and Pyrenophora teres on temperate cereals; Pyricularia oryzae and Rhizoctonia solani on rice; Plasmopara viticola and Uncinula necator on vines; Sphaerotheca fuliginea and Pseudoperonospora cubensis on cucurbitaceae; Phytophthora infestans and Alternaria solani on potato and tomato; Mycosphaerella arachidis, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii on peanut; Monilinia spp. and Cladosporium carpophilum on peach; Pythium spp. and Rhizoctonia solani on turf; Mycosphaerella spp. on banana; Cladosporium caryigenum on pecan; Elsinoë fawcettii, Colletotrichum spp. and Guignardia citricarpa on citrus; Colletotrichum spp. and Hemileia vastatrix on coffee.


As used herein, pyraclostrobin is the common name for methyl N-[2-[[[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]oxy]methyl]phenyl]-N-methoxycarbamate and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in BCPC Online Pesticide Manual—Latest Version. Exemplary uses of pyraclostrobin include, but are not limited to, broad spectrum disease control of major plant pathogens, including Zymoseptoria tritici, Puccinia spp., Drechslera tritici-repentis, Pyrenophora teres, Rhynchosporium secalis and Septoria nodorum in cereals; Mycosphaerella spp. in peanuts; Septoria glycines, Cercospora kikuchii and Phakopsora pachyrhizi in soybeans; Plasmopara viticola and Erysiphe necator in grapes; Phytophthora infestans and Alternaria solani in potatoes and tomatoes; Sphaerotheca fuliginea and Pseudoperonospora cubensis in cucumber; Mycosphaerella fijiensis in bananas; Elsinoë fawcettii and Guignardia citricarpa in citrus and Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium aphanidermatum in turf.


As used herein, fluxapyroxad is the common name for 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-(3′,4′,5′-trifluorobiphenyl-2-yl)pyrazole-4-carboxamide and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is exemplified in Agrow Intelligence (https://www.agranet.net/agra/agrow/databases/agrow-intelligence/). Exemplary uses of fluxapyroxad include, but are not limited to, the control of plant pathogens, such as Helminthosporium teres (net blotch), Rhynchosporium secalis (leaf scald), Puccinia hordei (brown rust), and Erysiphe graminis fsp. hordei (powdery mildew) in a range of crops, such as barley, maize, and soybeans.


As used herein, penthiopyrad is the common name for N-[2-(1,3-dimethylbutyl)-3-thienyl]-1-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in The Pesticide Manual, Fourteenth Edition, 2006. Penthiopyrad provides control of rust and Rhizoctonia diseases, as well as grey mold, powdery mildew and apple scab.


As used herein, benzovindiflupyr is the common name for N-[(1RS,4SR)-9-(dichloromethylene)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5-yl]-3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methylpyrazole-4-carboxamide and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is exemplified in Agrow Intelligence (https://www.agra-net.net/agra/agrow/databases/agrow-intelligence/). Exemplary uses of benzovindiflupyr include, but are not limited to, controlling a variety of pathogens such as Botrytis spp., Erysiphe spp., Rhizoctonia spp., Septoria spp., Phytophthora spp., Pythium spp., Phakopsora pachyrhizi, and Puccinia recondita, in a range of crops including vines, cereals, soybeans, cotton, and fruit and vegetable crops.


As used herein, bixafen is the common name for N-(3′,4′-dichloro-5-fluoro[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl)-3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in BCPC Online Pesticide Manual—Latest Version. Exemplary uses of bixafen include, but are not limited to, broad-spectrum disease control in cereals, including Zymoseptoria tritici, Puccinia triticina, Puccinia striiformis, Oculimacula spp. and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis in wheat and against Pyrenophora teres, Ramularia collo-cygni, Rhynchosporium secalis and Puccinia hordei in barley.


As used herein, fluopyram is the common name for N-[2-[3-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]ethyl]-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in BCPC Online Pesticide Manual—Latest Version. Fluopyram provides control of grey mold, powdery mildew and Sclerotinia and Monilinia diseases in vines, table grapes, pome fruit, stone fruit, vegetables and field crops and control of Sigatoka in bananas. It also provides control of nematodes when used as a seed treatment.


As used herein, chlorothalonil is the common name for tetrachloroisophthalonitrile and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in The Pesticide Manual, Fifteenth Edition, 2009. Chlorothalonil provides control of many fungal diseases in a wide range of crops, including pome fruit, stone fruit, almonds, citrus fruit, bush and cane fruit, cranberries, strawberries, pawpaws, bananas, mangoes, coconut palms, oil palms, rubber, pepper, vines, hops, vegetables, cucurbits, tobacco, coffee, tea, rice, soya beans, peanuts, potatoes, sugar beet, cotton, maize, ornamentals, mushrooms, and turf.


As used herein, mancozeb is the common name for [[2-[(dithiocarboxy)amino]ethyl]carbamodithioato(2-)-κS,κS]manganese mixture with [[2-[(dithiocarboxy)amino]ethyl]carbamodithioato(2-)-κS,κS]zinc and possesses the following structure:




embedded image


Its fungicidal activity is described in The Pesticide Manual, Fifteenth Edition, 2009. Mancozeb provides control of a wide range of fungal pathogens on a variety of fruits, vegetables and field crops.


In the compositions described herein, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to other fungicides at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against wheat leaf blotch caused by Zymoseptoria tritici (SEPTTR) in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 7:1 to about 1:3,200. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to other fungicides at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 7:1 to about 1:3,200. In another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to other fungicides at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 4:1 to about 1:2,500.


In the compositions described herein, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a sterol biosynthesis-inhibitor at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 4:1 to about 1:52. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a sterol biosynthesis-inhibitor at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 4:1 to about 1:52. In another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a sterol biosynthesis-inhibitor at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 4:1 to about 1:52. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to tebuconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 2:1 to about 1:4. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to tebuconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 2:1 to about 1:2, and in another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to tebuconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:1 to about 1:4. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to prothioconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 1:6.5 to about 1:52. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to prothioconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:6.5 to about 1:52, and in another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to prothioconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:6.5 to about 1:52. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to difenoconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 2:1 to about 1:2. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to difenoconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 2:1 to about 1:2, and in another embodiment the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to difenoconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 2:1 to about 1:2. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to epoxiconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 4:1 to about 1:2. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to epoxiconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 4:1 to about 1:2, and in another embodiment the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to epoxiconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 4:1 to about 1:1. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to mefentrifluconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 4:1 to about 1:2. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to mefentrifluconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 2:1 to about 1:2, and in another embodiment the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to mefentrifluconazole at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 4:1 to about 1:2.


In the compositions described herein, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a succinate dehydrogenase-inhibitor at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 1:1.2 to about 1:160. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a succinate dehydrogenase-inhibitor at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:1.2 to about 1:80. In another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a succinate dehydrogenase-inhibitor at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:2.4 to about 1:160. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to benzovindiflupyr at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 1:1.2 to about 1:5. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to benzovindiflupyr at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:1.2 to about 1:5, and in another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to benzovindiflupyr at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications is about 1:2.4. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to penthiopyrad at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 1:10 to about 1:160. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to penthiopyrad at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications is about 1:80, and in another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to penthiopyrad at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:10 to about 1:160. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to fluxapyroxad at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 1:2.5 to about 1:40. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to fluxapyroxad at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:2.5 to about 1:20, and in another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to fluxapyroxad at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications is about 1:40. In another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to bixafen at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:2.5 to about 1:10. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to fluopyram at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 1:1 to about 1:32. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to fluopyram at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:1 to about 1:32, and in another embodiment the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to fluopyram at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:1 to about 1:16.


In the compositions described herein, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a strobilurin fungicide at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 7:1 to about 1:80. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a strobilurin fungicide at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 7:1 to about 1:80. In another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a strobilurin fungicide at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:1 to about 1:80. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to picoxystrobin at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 1:5 to about 1:80. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to picoxystrobin at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:10 to about 1:80, and in another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to picoxystrobin at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:5 to about 1:80. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to azoxystrobin at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 2.5:1 to about 1:4. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to azoxystrobin at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 2.5:1 to about 1:3.2, and in another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to azoxystrobin at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:1 to about 1:4. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to pyraclostrobin at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 7:1 to about 1:4. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to pyraclostrobin at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 7:1 to about 1:4, and in another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to pyraclostrobin at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications is about 1:1.


In the compositions described herein, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to a multi-site inhibitor at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 1:325 to about 1:3,200. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the compound of Formula I to a multi-site inhibitor at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:325 to about 1:3,200. In another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the compound of Formula I to a multi-site inhibitor at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:1,250 to about 1:2,600. In some embodiments, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to chlorothalonil at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant and curative applications lies within the range from about 1:325 to about 1:2,500. In one embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to chlorothalonil at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:325 to about 1:2,600, and in another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to chlorothalonil at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in curative applications lies within the range from about 1:1,250 to about 1:2,500. In another embodiment, the concentration ratio of the mixture of the compound of Formula I to mancozeb at which the fungicidal effect is synergistic against SEPTTR in protectant applications lies within the range from about 1:325 to about 1:3,200.


The rate at which the synergistic composition is applied will depend upon the particular type of fungus to be controlled, the degree of control required and the timing and method of application. In general, the compositions described herein can be applied at an application rate of between about 35 grams per hectare (g/ha) and about 2600 g/ha based on the total amount of active ingredients in the composition.


The compositions comprising the compound of Formula I and a sterol biosynthesis-inhibitor can be applied at an application rate of between about 40 g/ha and about 350 g/ha based on the total amount of active ingredients in the composition. Epoxiconazole is applied at a rate of between about 50 g/ha and about 250 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Prothioconazole is applied at a rate of between about 50 g/ha and about 250 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Difenconazole is applied at a rate of between about 30 g/ha and about 125 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Tebuconazole is applied at a rate of between about 50 g/ha and about 300 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Mefentrifluconazole is applied at a rate of between about 10 g/ha and about 200 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha.


The compositions comprising the compound of Formula I and a succinate dehydrogenase-inhibitor can be applied at an application rate of between about 35 g/ha and about 500 g/ha based on the total amount of active ingredients in the composition. Benzovindiflupyr is applied at a rate of between about 25 g/ha and about 300 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Penthiopyrad is applied at a rate of between about 100 g/ha and about 400 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Fluxapyroxad is applied at a rate of between about 45 g/ha and about 200 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Bixafen is applied at a rate of between about 30 g/ha and about 200 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Fluopyram is applied at a rate of between about 50 g/ha and about 300 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha.


The compositions comprising the compound of Formula I and a strobilurin can be applied at an application rate of between about 60 g/ha and about 475 g/ha based on the total amount of active ingredients in the composition. Picoxystrobin is applied at a rate of between about 50 g/ha and about 250 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Azoxystrobin is applied at a rate of between about 100 g/ha and about 375 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Pyraclostrobin is applied at a rate of between about 50 g/ha and about 250 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha.


The compositions comprising the compound of Formula I and a multi-site inhibitor can be applied at an application rate of between about 1010 g/ha and about 2600 g/ha based on the total amount of active ingredients in the composition. Chlorothalonil is applied at a rate of between about 1000 g/ha and about 2500 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha. Mancozeb is applied at a rate of between about 1500 g/ha and about 2000 g/ha and the compound of Formula I is applied at a rate between about 10 g/ha and about 100 g/ha.


The components of the synergistic mixture described herein can be applied either separately or as part of a multipart fungicidal system.


The synergistic mixture of the present disclosure can be applied in conjunction with one or more other fungicides to control a wider variety of undesirable diseases. When used in conjunction with other fungicide(s), the presently claimed compounds may be formulated with the other fungicide(s), tank mixed with the other fungicide(s) or applied sequentially with the other fungicide(s). Such other fungicides may include 2-(thiocyanatomethylthio)-benzothiazole, 2-phenylphenol, 8-hydroxyquinoline sulfate, ametoctradin, amisulbrom, antimycin, Ampelomyces quisqualis, azaconazole, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus subtilis strain QST713, benalaxyl, benomyl, benthiavalicarb-isopropyl, benzylaminobenzene-sulfonate (BABS) salt, bicarbonates, biphenyl, bismerthiazol, bitertanol, blasticidin-S, borax, Bordeaux mixture, boscalid, bromuconazole, bupirimate, calcium polysulfide, captafol, captan, carbendazim, carboxin, carpropamid, carvone, chlazafenone, chloroneb, chlozolinate, Coniothyrium minitans, copper hydroxide, copper octanoate, copper oxychloride, copper sulfate, copper sulfate (tribasic), cuprous oxide, cyazofamid, cyflufenamid, cymoxanil, cyproconazole, cyprodinil, dazomet, debacarb, diammonium ethylenebis-(dithiocarbamate), dichlofluanid, dichlorophen, diclocymet, diclomezine, dichloran, diethofencarb, difenzoquat ion, diflumetorim, dimethomorph, dimoxystrobin, diniconazole, diniconazole-M, dinobuton, dinocap, diphenylamine, dipymetitrone, dithianon, dodemorph, dodemorph acetate, dodine, dodine free base, edifenphos, enestrobin, enestroburin, ethaboxam, ethoxyquin, etridiazole, famoxadone, fenamidone, fenarimol, fenbuconazole, fenfuram, fenhexamid, fenoxanil, fenpiclonil, fenpropidin, fenpropimorph, fenpyrazamine, fentin, fentin acetate, fentin hydroxide, ferbam, ferimzone, fluazinam, fludioxonil, fluindapyr, flumorph, fluopicolide, fluopyram, fluoroimide, fluoxastrobin, fluquinconazole, flusilazole, flusulfamide, flutianil, flutolanil, flutriafol, folpet, formaldehyde, fosetyl, fosetyl-aluminium, fuberidazole, furalaxyl, furametpyr, guazatine, guazatine acetates, GY-81, hexachlorobenzene, hexaconazole, hymexazol, imazalil, imazalil sulfate, imibenconazole, iminoctadine, iminoctadine triacetate, iminoctadine tris(albesilate), iodocarb, ipconazole, ipfenpyrazolone, iprobenfos, iprodione, iprovalicarb, isofetamide, isoprothiolane, isopyrazam, isotianil, kasugamycin, kasugamycin hydrochloride hydrate, kresoxium-methyl, laminarin, mancopper, mandipropamid, maneb, mefenoxam, mepanipyrim, mepronil, meptyl-dinocap, mercuric chloride, mercuric oxide, mercurous chloride, metalaxyl, metalaxyl-M, metam, metam-ammonium, metam-potassium, metam-sodium, metconazole, methasulfocarb, methyl iodide, methyl isothiocyanate, metiram, metominostrobin, metrafenone, mildiomycin, myclobutanil, nab am, nitrothal-isopropyl, nuarimol, octhilinone, ofurace, oleic acid (fatty acids), orysastrobin, oxadixyl, oxathiapiprolin, oxine-copper, oxpoconazole fumarate, oxycarboxin, pefurazoate, penconazole, pencycuron, penflufen, pentachlorophenol, pentachlorophenyl laurate, phenylmercury acetate, phosphonic acid, phthalide, polyoxin B, polyoxins, polyoxorim, potassium bicarbonate, potassium hydroxyquinoline sulfate, probenazole, prochloraz, procymidone, propamocarb, propamocarb hydrochloride, propiconazole, propineb, proquinazid, pydiflumetofen, pyrametostrobin, pyraoxystrobin, pyraziflumid, pyrazophos, pyribencarb, pyributicarb, pyrifenox, pyrimethanil, pyriofenone, pyroquilon, quinoclamine, quinoxyfen, quintozene, Reynoutria sachalinensis extract, sedaxane, silthiofam, simeconazole, sodium 2-phenylphenoxide, sodium bicarbonate, sodium pentachlorophenoxide, spiroxamine, sulfur, SYP-Z048, tar oils, tebufloquin, tecnazene, tetraconazole, thiabendazole, thifluzamide, thiophanate-methyl, thiram, tiadinil, tolclofos-methyl, tolylfluanid, triadimefon, triadimenol, triazoxide, tricyclazole, tridemorph, trifloxystrobin, triflumizole, triforine, triticonazole, validamycin, valifenalate, valiphenal, vinclozolin, zineb, ziram, zoxamide, Candida oleophila, Fusarium oxysporum, Gliocladium spp., Phlebiopsis gigantea, Streptomyces griseoviridis, Trichoderma spp., (RS)—N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-2-(methoxymethyl)-succinimide, 1,2-dichloropropane, 1,3-dichloro-1,1,3,3-tetrafluoroacetone hydrate, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitronaphthalene, 1-chloro-2-nitropropane, 2-(2-heptadecyl-2-imidazolin-1-yl)ethanol, 2,3-dihydro-5-phenyl-1,4-dithi-ine 1,1,4,4-tetraoxide, 2-methoxyethylmercury acetate, 2-methoxyethylmercury chloride, 2-methoxyethylmercury silicate, 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-methylrhodanine, 4-(2-nitroprop-1-enyl)phenyl thiocyanateme, aminopyrifen, ampropylfos, anilazine, azithiram, barium polysulfide, Bayer 32394, benodanil, benquinox, bentaluron, benzamacril; benzamacril-isobutyl, benzamorf, binapacryl, bis(methylmercury) sulfate, bis(tributyltin) oxide, buthiobate, cadmium calcium copper zinc chromate sulfate, carbamorph, CECA, chlobenthiazone, chloraniformethan, chlorfenazole, chlorquinox, climbazole, copper bis(3-phenylsalicylate), copper zinc chromate, cufraneb, cupric hydrazinium sulfate, cuprobam, cyclafuramid, cypendazole, cyprofuram, decafentin, dichlobentiazox, dichlone, dichlozoline, diclobutrazol, dimethirimol, dinocton, dinosulfon, dinoterbon, dipyrithione, ditalimfos, dodicin, drazoxolon, EBP, ESBP, etaconazole, etem, ethirim, fenaminosulf, fenapanil, fenitropan, fluindapyr, fluopimomide, fluotrimazole, furcarbanil, furconazole, furconazole-cis, furmecyclox, furophanate, glyodine, griseofulvin, halacrinate, Hercules 3944, hexylthiofos, ICIA0858, inpyrfluxam, ipfentrifluconazole, ipflufenoquin, isoflucypram, isopamphos, isovaledione, mandestrobin, mebenil, mecarbinzid, metazoxolon, methfuroxam, methylmercury dicyandiamide, metsulfovax, metyltetraprole, milneb, mucochloric anhydride, myclozolin, N-3,5-dichlorophenyl-succinimide, N-3-nitrophenylitaconimide, natamycin, N-ethylmercurio-4-toluenesulfonanilide, nickel bis(dimethyldithiocarbamate), OCH, phenylmercury dimethyldithiocarbamate, phenylmercury nitrate, phosdiphen, prothiocarb; prothiocarb hydrochloride, pydiflumetofen, pyracarbolid, pyrapropoyne, pyridachlometyl, pyridinitril, pyroxychlor, pyroxyfur, quinacetol; quinacetol sulfate, quinazamid, quinconazole, quinofumelin, rabenzazole, salicylanilide, SSF-109, sultropen, tecoram, thiadifluor, thicyofen, thiochlorfenphim, thiophanate, thioquinox, tioxymid, triamiphos, triarimol, triazbutil, trichlamide, urbacid, zarilamid, and any combinations thereof.


The compositions of the present disclosure are preferably applied in the form of a formulation comprising a composition of (a) a compound of Formula I and (b) at least one fungicide selected from the group consisting of tebuconazole, prothioconazole, difenconazole, epoxiconazole, benzovindiflupyr, penthiopyrad, fluxapyroxad, bixafen, picoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, azoxystrobin, mefentrifuconazole, fluopyram, mancozeb and chlorothalonil, together with a phytologically acceptable carrier.


Concentrated formulations can be dispersed in water, or another liquid, for application, or formulations can be dust-like or granular, which can then be applied without further treatment. The formulations are prepared according to procedures which are conventional in the agricultural chemical art, but which are novel and important because of the presence therein of a synergistic composition.


The formulations that are applied most often are aqueous suspensions or emulsions. Either such water-soluble, water-suspendable, or emulsifiable formulations are solids, usually known as wettable powders, or liquids, usually known as emulsifiable concentrates, aqueous suspensions, or suspension concentrates. The present disclosure contemplates all vehicles by which the synergistic compositions can be formulated for delivery and use as a fungicide.


As will be readily appreciated, any material to which these synergistic compositions can be added may be used, provided they yield the desired utility without significant interference with the activity of these synergistic compositions as antifungal agents.


Wettable powders, which may be compacted to form water-dispersible granules, comprise an intimate mixture of the synergistic composition, a carrier and agriculturally acceptable surfactants. The concentration of the synergistic composition in the wettable powder is usually from about 10% to about 90% by weight, more preferably about 25% to about 75% by weight, based on the total weight of the formulation. In the preparation of wettable powder formulations, the synergistic composition can be compounded with any of the finely divided solids, such as prophyllite, talc, chalk, gypsum, Fuller's earth, bentonite, attapulgite, starch, casein, gluten, montmorillonite clays, diatomaceous earths, purified silicates or the like. In such operations, the finely divided carrier is ground or mixed with the synergistic composition in a volatile organic solvent. Effective surfactants, comprising from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight of the wettable powder, include sulfonated lignins, naphthalenesulfonates, alkylbenzenesulfonates, alkyl sulfates, and non-ionic surfactants, such as ethylene oxide adducts of alkyl phenols.


Emulsifiable concentrates of the synergistic composition comprise a convenient concentration, such as from about 10% to about 50% by weight, in a suitable liquid, based on the total weight of the emulsifiable concentrate formulation. The components of the synergistic compositions, jointly or separately, are dissolved in a carrier, which is either a water-miscible solvent or a mixture of water-immiscible organic solvents, and emulsifiers. The concentrates may be diluted with water and oil to form spray mixtures in the form of oil-in-water emulsions. Useful organic solvents include aromatics, especially the high-boiling naphthalenic and olefinic portions of petroleum such as heavy aromatic naphtha. Other organic solvents may also be used, such as, for example, terpenic solvents, including rosin derivatives, aliphatic ketones, such as cyclohexanone, and complex alcohols, such as 2-ethoxyethanol.


Emulsifiers which can be advantageously employed herein can be readily determined by those skilled in the art and include various nonionic, anionic, cationic and amphoteric emulsifiers, or a blend of two or more emulsifiers. Examples of nonionic emulsifiers useful in preparing the emulsifiable concentrates include the polyalkylene glycol ethers and condensation products of alkyl and aryl phenols, aliphatic alcohols, aliphatic amines or fatty acids with ethylene oxide, propylene oxides such as the ethoxylated alkyl phenols and carboxylic esters solubilized with the polyol or polyoxyalkylene. Cationic emulsifiers include quaternary ammonium compounds and fatty amine salts. Anionic emulsifiers include the oil-soluble salts (e.g., calcium) of alkylaryl sulfonic acids, oil-soluble salts or sulfated polyglycol ethers and appropriate salts of phosphated polyglycol ether.


Representative organic liquids which can be employed in preparing the emulsifiable concentrates of the present disclosure are the aromatic liquids such as xylene, propyl benzene fractions, or mixed naphthalene fractions, mineral oils, substituted aromatic organic liquids such as dioctyl phthalate, kerosene, dialkyl amides of various fatty acids, particularly the dimethyl amides of fatty glycols and glycol derivatives such as the n-butyl ether, ethyl ether or methyl ether of diethylene glycol, and the methyl ether of triethylene glycol. Mixtures of two or more organic liquids are also often suitably employed in the preparation of the emulsifiable concentrate. The preferred organic liquids are xylene, and propyl benzene fractions, with xylene being most preferred. The surface-active dispersing agents are usually employed in liquid formulations and in the amount of from 0.1 to 20 percent by weight of the combined weight of the dispersing agent with the synergistic compositions. The formulations can also contain other compatible additives, for example, plant growth regulators and other biologically active compounds used in agriculture.


Aqueous suspensions comprise suspensions of one or more water-insoluble compounds, dispersed in an aqueous vehicle at a concentration in the range from about 5% to about 70% by weight, based on the total weight of the aqueous suspension formulation. Suspensions are prepared by finely grinding the components of the synergistic combination either together or separately, and vigorously mixing the ground material into a vehicle comprised of water and surfactants chosen from the same types discussed above. Other ingredients, such as inorganic salts and synthetic or natural gums, may also be added to increase the density and viscosity of the aqueous vehicle. It is often most effective to grind and mix at the same time by preparing the aqueous mixture and homogenizing it in an implement such as a sand mill, ball mill, or piston-type homogenizer.


The synergistic composition may also be applied as a granular formulation, which is particularly useful for applications to the soil. Granular formulations usually contain from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight of the compounds, based on the total weight of the granular formulation, dispersed in a carrier which consists entirely or in large part of coarsely divided attapulgite, bentonite, diatomite, clay or a similar inexpensive substance. Such formulations are usually prepared by dissolving the synergistic composition in a suitable solvent and applying it to a granular carrier which has been preformed to the appropriate particle size, in the range of from about 0.5 to about 3 millimeters (mm). Such formulations may also be prepared by making a dough or paste of the carrier and the synergistic composition, and crushing and drying to obtain the desired granular particle.


Dusts containing the synergistic composition are prepared simply by intimately mixing the synergistic composition in powdered form with a suitable dusty agricultural carrier, such as, for example, kaolin clay, ground volcanic rock, and the like. Dusts can suitably contain from about 1% to about 10% by weight of the synergistic composition/carrier combination.


The formulations may contain agriculturally acceptable adjuvant surfactants to enhance deposition, wetting and penetration of the synergistic composition onto the target crop and organism. These adjuvant surfactants may optionally be employed as a component of the formulation or as a tank mix. The amount of adjuvant surfactant will vary from 0.01 percent to 1.0 percent volume/volume (v/v) based on a spray-volume of water, preferably 0.05 to 0.5 percent. Suitable adjuvant surfactants include ethoxylated nonyl phenols, ethoxylated synthetic or natural alcohols, salts of the esters or sulfosuccinic acids, ethoxylated organosilicones, ethoxylated fatty amines and blends of surfactants with mineral or vegetable oils.


The formulations may optionally include combinations that can comprise at least 1% by weight of one or more of the synergistic compositions with another pesticidal compound. Such additional pesticidal compounds may be fungicides, insecticides, nematocides, miticides, arthropodicides, bactericides or combinations thereof that are compatible with the synergistic compositions of the present disclosure in the medium selected for application, and not antagonistic to the activity of the present compounds. Accordingly, in such embodiments the other pesticidal compound is employed as a supplemental toxicant for the same or for a different pesticidal use. The pesticidal compound and the synergistic composition can generally be mixed together in a weight ratio of from 1:100 to 100:1.


The present disclosure includes within its scope methods for the control or prevention of fungal attack. These methods comprise applying to the locus of the fungus, or to a locus in which the infestation is to be prevented (for example applying to wheat or barley plants), a fungicidally effective amount of the synergistic composition. The synergistic composition is suitable for treatment of various plants at fungicidal levels, while exhibiting low phytotoxicity. The synergistic composition is useful in a protectant or eradicant fashion. The synergistic composition is applied by any of a variety of known techniques, either as the synergistic composition or as a formulation comprising the synergistic composition. For example, the synergistic compositions may be applied to the roots, seeds or foliage of plants for the control of various fungi, without damaging the commercial value of the plants. The synergistic composition is applied in the form of any of the generally used formulation types, for example, as solutions, dusts, wettable powders, flowable concentrates, or emulsifiable concentrates. These materials are conveniently applied in various known fashions.


The synergistic composition has been found to have significant fungicidal effect, particularly for agricultural use. The synergistic composition is particularly effective for use with agricultural crops and horticultural plants, or with wood, paint, leather or carpet backing.


In particular, the synergistic composition is effective in controlling a variety of undesirable fungi that infect useful plant crops. The synergistic composition may be used against a variety of Ascomycete and Basidiomycete fungi, including for example the following representative fungi species: barley leaf scald (Rhynchosporium secalis); barley Ramularia leaf spot (Ramularia collo-cygni); barley net blotch (Pyrenophora teres); barley powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei); wheat powdery midlew (Blumeria graminis f sp. tritici); wheat brown rust (Puccinia triticina); stripe rust of wheat (Puccinia striiformis); leaf blotch of wheat (Zymoseptoria tritici); glume blotch of wheat (Parastagonospora nodorum); leaf spot of sugar beets (Cercospora beticola); leaf spot of peanut (Mycosphaerella arachidis); cucumber anthracnose (Colletotrichum lagenarium); cucumber powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum); watermelon stem gummy blight (Didymella bryoniae); apple scab (Venturia inaequalis); apple powdery mildew (Podosphaera leucotricha); grey mold (Botrytis cinerea); Sclerotinia white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum); grape powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator); early blight of tomato (Alternaira solani); rice blast (Pyricularia oryzae); brown rot of stone fruits (Monilinia fructicola) and black sigatoka disease of banana (Mycosphaerella fifiensis). It will be understood by those in the art that the efficacy of the synergistic compositions for one or more of the foregoing fungi establishes the general utility of the synergistic compositions as fungicides.


The synergistic compositions have a broad range of efficacy as a fungicide. The exact amount of the synergistic composition to be applied is dependent not only on the relative amounts of the components, but also on the particular action desired, the fungal species to be controlled, and the stage of growth thereof, as well as the part of the plant or other product to be contacted with the synergistic composition. Thus, formulations containing the synergistic composition may not be equally effective at similar concentrations or against the same fungal species.


The synergistic compositions are effective in use with plants in a disease-inhibiting and phytologically acceptable amount. The term “disease-inhibiting and phytologically acceptable amount” refers to an amount of the synergistic composition that kills or inhibits the plant disease for which control is desired, but is not significantly toxic to the plant. The exact concentration of synergistic composition required varies with the fungal disease to be controlled, the type of formulation employed, the method of application, the particular plant species, climate conditions, and the like.


The present compositions can be applied to fungi or their locus by the use of conventional ground sprayers, granule applicators, and by other conventional means known to those skilled in the art.


The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes and should not be construed as limitations to the disclosure.


EXAMPLES

Evaluation of Curative and Protectant Activity of Fungicide Mixtures vs. Leaf Blotch of Wheat (Zymoseptoria tritici; Bayer code: SEPTTR):


Wheat plants (variety Yuma) were grown from seed in a greenhouse in plastic pots with a surface area of 27.5 square centimeters (cm2) containing 50% mineral soil/50% soil-less Metro mix, with 8-12 seedlings per pot. The plants were employed for testing when the first leaf was fully emerged, which typically took 7 to 8 days after planting.


Treatments consisted of fungicide compounds difenoconazole, epoxiconazole, prothioconazole, tebuconazole, mefentrifluconazole, azoxystrobin, picoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, penthiopyrad, fluxapyroxad, benzovindiflupyr, bixafen, fluopyram, mancozeb and chlorothalonil, either using individually or as two-way mixture with the compound of Formula I.


The compounds were tested as technical grade material formulated in acetone, and spray solutions contained 10% acetone and 100 ppm Triton X-100. Fungicide solutions were applied onto plants using an automated booth sprayer, which utilized two 6218-1/4 JAUPM spray nozzles operating at 20 pounds per square inch (psi) set at opposing angles to cover both leaf surfaces. All sprayed plants were allowed to air dry prior to further handling. Control plants were sprayed in the same manner with the solvent blank.


Test plants were inoculated with an aqueous spore suspension of Zymoseptoria tritici either 3 days prior to (3-day curative test) or 1 day after fungicide treatments (1-day protectant test). After inoculation the plants were kept in 100% relative humidity (one day in a dark dew chamber followed by two days in a lighted mist chamber) to permit spores to germinate and infect the leaf. The plants were then transferred to a greenhouse for disease to develop. When disease fully developed on untreated plants, disease severity on the first leaf of the seedlings was assessed and activity was represented by percent of leaf area free of SEPTTR infection relative to the untreated plants.


Colby's equation was used to determine the fungicidal effects expected from the mixtures. (See Colby, S. R. Calculation of the synergistic and antagonistic response of herbicide combinations. Weeds 1967, 15, 20-22.)


The following equation was used to calculate the expected activity of mixtures containing two active ingredients, A and B:

Expected=A+B−(A×B/100)

    • A=observed efficacy of active component A at the same concentration as used in the mixture;
    • B=observed efficacy of active component B at the same concentration as used in the mixture.


Synergistic interactions between compound I and other fungicides were detected in curative and/or protectant assays vs. SEPTTR (Tables 1-7).









TABLE 1







Synergistic Interactions of the Compound of Formula I and Other Fungicides In


a 1-Day Protectant (1DP) Zymoseptoria tritici (SEPTTR) Assay - Test 1.











Rates
SEPTTR*
Synergism











Composition
(ppm)*
Observed*
Expected*
Factor*














Epoxiconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.1
83
76
1.09


Epoxiconazole + Compound I
0.025 + 0.1 
91
72
1.26


Epoxiconazole + Compound I
 0.1 + 0.05
98
68
1.43


Epoxicinazole + Compound I
 0.05 + 0.05
69
44
1.57


Epoxiconazole + Compound I
0.025 + 0.05
62
34
1.79


Prothioconazole + Compound I
1.28 + 0.1
83
73
1.13


Prothioconazole + Compound I
0.64 + 0.1
90
81
1.11


Prothioconazole + Compound I
 1.28 + 0.05
93
37
2.53


Prothioconazole + Compound I
 0.64 + 0.05
81
55
1.46


Prothioconazole + Compound I
 0.32 + 0.05
62
51
1.21


Benzovindiflupyr + Compound I
 0.3 + 0.1
89
83
1.06


Benzovindiflupyr + Compound I
0.075 + 0.05
45
39
1.13


Bixafen + Compound I
 0.5 + 0.1
78
73
1.08


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
0.014 + 0.1 
97
89
1.09


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
0.028 + 0.05
85
47
1.80


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
0.014 + 0.05
98
75
1.31


Chlorothalonil + Compound I

129 + 0.05

94
82
1.15


Mancozeb + Compound I

160 + 0.05

95
89
1.07





*SEPTTR = Leaf Blotch of Wheat; Zymoseptoria tritici


*Observed = Observed percent disease control at the test rates


*Expected = Perecent disease control expected as predicted by the Colby equation


*ppm = Parts per million


*Synergism factor = Observed/Expected













TABLE 2







Synergistic Interactions of the Compound of Formula I and Other Fungicides In


a 1-Day Protectant (1DP) Zymoseptoria tritici (SEPTTR) Assay - Test 2.











Rates
SEPTTR*
Synergism











Composition
(ppm)*
Observed*
Expected*
Factor*














Epoxiconazole + Compound I
0.1 + 0.1
100
67
1.48


Epoxiconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.1 
89
64
1.39


Epoxiconazole + Compound I
0.025 + 0.1 
91
58
1.58


Prothioconazole + Compound I
2.6 + 0.1
99
91
1.09


Prothioconazole + Compound I
1.3 + 0.1
98
84
1.16


Prothioconazole + Compound I
0.65 + 0.1 
99
82
1.21


Prothioconazole + Compound I
 2.6 + 0.05
99
84
1.18


Prothioconazole + Compound I
 1.3 + 0.05
94
72
1.30


Prothioconazole + Compound I
0.65 + 0.05
79
68
1.16


Difenoconazole + Compound I
0.1 + 0.1
100
87
1.15


Difenoconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.1 
100
73
1.36


Difenoconazole + Compound I
 0.1 + 0.05
96
76
1.27


Difenoconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.05
91
52
1.74


Tebuconazole + Compound I
0.2 + 0.1
96
62
1.56


Tebuconazole + Compound I
0.1 + 0.1
89
60
1.49


Tebuconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.1 
82
59
1.39


Benzovindiflupyr + Compound I
0.5 + 0.1
75
70
1.08


Benzovindiflupyr + Compound I
0.25 + 0.1 
86
59
1.45


Benzovindiflupyr + Compound I
0.12 + 0.1 
91
59
1.56


Benzovindiflupyr + Compound I
0.25 + 0.05
40
27
1.48


Benzovindiflupyr + Compound I
0.12 + 0.05
32
26
1.22


Fluxapyroxad + Compound I

1 + 0.1

93
63
1.47


Fluxapyroxad + Compound I
0.5 + 0.1
98
59
1.68


Fluxapyroxad + Compound I
0.25 + 0.1 
99
58
1.72


Fluxapyroxad + Compound I
  1 + 0.05
51
34
1.50


Fluxapyroxad + Compound I
 0.5 + 0.05
30
26
1.15


Fluxapyroxad + Compound I
0.25 + 0.05
26
25
1.07


Bixafen + Compound I

1 + 0.1

86
65
1.33


Bixafen + Compound I
0.5 + 0.1
77
65
1.20


Bixafen + Compound I
0.25 + 0.1 
77
65
1.20


Bixafen + Compound I
 0.5 + 0.05
40
36
1.11


Bixafen + Compound I
0.25 + 0.05
46
36
1.25


Azoxystrobin + Compound I
0.16 + 0.1 
79
62
1.28


Azoxystrobin + Compound I
0.08 + 0.1 
96
62
1.54


Azoxystrobin + Compound I
0.04 + 0.1 
98
59
1.65


Azoxystrobin + Compound I
0.16 + 0.05
49
31
1.58


Azoxystrobin + Compound I
0.08 + 0.05
47
33
1.46


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
0.2 + 0.1
100
84
1.19


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
0.1 + 0.1
95
6
1.43


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
0.05 + 0.1 
96
61
1.59


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
 0.2 + 0.05
96
71
1.36


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
 0.1 + 0.05
51
39
1.30


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
0.05 + 0.05
33
30
1.12


Chlorothalonil + Compound I
130 + 0.1 
100
67
1.50


Chlorothalonil + Compound I
 65 + 0.1
100
66
1.51


Chlorothalonil + Compound I
32.5 + 0.1 
100
69
1.44


Chlorothalonil + Compound I
 130 + 0.05
92
40
2.26


Chlorothalonil + Compound I

65 + 0.05

79
39
2.02


Chlorothalonil + Compound I
32.5 + 0.05
61
44
1.38


Mancozeb + Compound I
130 + 0.1 
100
66
1.51


Mancozeb + Compound I
 65 + 0.1
100
79
1.26


Mancozeb + Compound I
32.5 + 0.1 
99
61
1.63


Mancozeb + Compound I
 130 + 0.05
95
39
2.43


Mancozeb + Compound I

65 + 0.05

89
63
1.41


Mancozeb + Compound I
32.5 + 0.05
61
30
2.06





*SEPTTR = Leaf Blotch of Wheat; Zymoseptoria tritici


*Observed = Observed percent disease control at the test rates


*Expected = Percent disease control expected as predicted by the Colby equation


*ppm = Parts per million


*Synergism factor = Observed/Expected













TABLE 3







Synergistic Interactions of the Compound of Formula I and Other Fungicides In


a 1-Day Protectant (1DP) Zymoseptoria tritici (SEPTTR) Assay - Test 3.











Rates
SEPTTR*
Synergism











Composition
(ppm)*
Observed*
Expected*
Factor*














Penthiopyrad + Compound I
 2 + 0.025
39
26
1.49


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
4 + 0.05
70
60
1.17


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
2 + 0.05
58
36
1.59


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
 2 + 0.025
36
27
1.31


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
1 + 0.05
39
18
2.23


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
 1 + 0.025
22
6
3.67


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
0.5 + 0.05
32
26
1.22


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
0.5 + 0.025 
18
16
1.12





*SEPTTR = Leaf Blotch of Wheat; Zymoseptoria tritici


*Observed = Observed percent disease control at the test rates


*Expected = Percent disease control expected as predicted by the Colby equation


*ppm = Parts per million


*Synergism factor = Observed/Expected













TABLE 4







Synergistic Interactions of the Compound of Formula I and Other Fungicides


In a 3-Day Curative (3DC) Zymoseptoria tritici (SEPTTR) Assay - Test 4.











Rates
SEPTTR*
Synergism











Composition
(ppm)*
Observed*
Expected*
Factor*














Prothioconazole + Compound I
0.65 + 0.05
77
63
1.22


Tebuconazole + Compound I
0.2 + 0.1
97
81
1.20


Tebuconazole + Compound I
 0.2 + 0.05
43
25
1.74


Tebuconazole + Compound I
 0.1 + 0.05
43
13
3.25


Fluxapyroxad + Compound I
  2 + 0.05
100
95
1.05


Benzovinidiflupyr + Compound I
0.12 + 0.05
41
25
1.60


Azoxystrobin + Compound I
 0.2 + 0.05
48
23
2.03


Azoxystrobin + Compound I
0.05 + 0.05
21
17
1.27


Pyraclostrobin + Compound I
0.05 + 0.05
96
63
1.52


Chlorothalonil + Compound I
 125 + 0.05
48
15
3.11


Chlorothalonil + Compound I
62.5 + 0.05
39
11
3.64





*SEPTTR = Leaf Blotch of Wheat; Zymoseptoria tritici


*Observed = Observed percent disease control at the test rates


*Expected = Percent disease control expected as predicted by the Colby equation


*ppm = Parts per million


*Synergism factor = Observed/Expected













TABLE 5







Synergistic Interactions of the Compound of Formula I and Other Fungicides


In a 3-Day Curative (3DC) Zymoseptoria tritici (SEPTTR) Assay - Test 5.











Rates
SEPTTR*
Synergism











Composition
(ppm)*
Observed*
Expected*
Factor*














Epoxiconazole + Compound I
0.1 + 0.1
100
67
1.48


Epoxiconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.1 
89
64
1.39


Epoxiconazole + Compound I
0.025 + 0.1 
91
58
1.58


Prothioconazole + Compound I
2.6 + 0.1
99
91
1.09


Prothioconazole + Compound I
1.3 + 0.1
98
84
1.16


Prothioconazole + Compound I
0.65 + 0.1 
99
82
1.21


Prothioconazole + Compound I
 2.6 + 0.05
99
84
1.18


Prothioconazole + Compound I
 1.3 + 0.05
94
72
1.30


Prothioconazole + Compound I
0.65 + 0.05
79
68
1.16


Difenoconazole + Compound I
0.1 + 0.1
100
87
1.15


Difenoconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.1 
100
73
1.36


Difenoconazole + Compound I
 0.1 + 0.05
96
76
1.27


Difenoconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.05
91
52
1.74


Tebuconazole + Compound I
0.2 + 0.1
96
62
1.56


Tebuconazole + Compound I
0.1 + 0.1
89
60
1.49


Penthiopyrad + Compound I

4 + 0.1

94
64
1.47


Penthiopyrad + Compound I
  4 + 0.05
93
54
1.71


Penthiopyrad + Compound I
   4 + 0.025
93
42
2.22


Penthiopyrad + Compound I
  2 + 0.05
50
45
1.10


Penthiopyrad + Compound I
   2 + 0.025
34
31
1.11


Penthiopyrad + Compound I

1 + 0.1

46
39
1.17


Penthiopyrad + Compound I
 0.5 + 0.05
29
21
1.39


Picoxystrobin + Compound I

4 + 0.1

85
53
1.60


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
  4 + 0.05
68
41
1.67


Picoxystrobin + Compound I

2 + 0.1

89
48
1.86


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
  2 + 0.05
59
34
1.74


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
   2 + 0.025
21
17
1.25


Picoxystrobin + Compound I

1 + 0.1

83
40
2.08


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
  1 + 0.05
42
24
1.73


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
   1 + 0.025
25
4
6.25


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
0.5 + 0.1
77
38
2.03


Picoxystrobin + Compound I
 0.5 + 0.05
54
21
2.58





*SEPTTR = Leaf Blotch of Wheat; Zymoseptoria tritici


*Observed = Observed percent disease control at the test rates


*Expected = Percent disease control expected as predicted by the Colby equation


*ppm = Parts per million


*Synergism factor = Observed/Expected













TABLE 6







Synergistic Interactions of the Compound of Formula I and Other Fungicides In


a 1-Day Protectant (1DP) Zymoseptoria tritici (SEPTTR) Assay - Test 6.











Rates
SEPTTR
Synergism











Composition
(ppm)
Observed*
Expected*
Factor*














Mefentrifluconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.1 
91
74
1.23


Mefentrifluconazole + Compound I
 0.1 + 0.05
95
82
1.16


Fluopyram + Compound I
3.2 + 0.1
97
86
1.13


Fluopyram + Compound I
1.6 + 0.1
95
70
1.36


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.8 + 0.1
96
69
1.38


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.4 + 0.1
99
68
1.45


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.2 + 0.1
91
68
1.33


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.1 + 0.1
82
68
1.21


Fluopyram + Compound I
 0.8 + 0.05
57
51
1.13


Fluopyram + Compound I
 0.4 + 0.05
56
50
1.12





*SEPTTR = Leaf Blotch of Wheat; Zymoseptoria tritici


*Observed = Observed percent disease control at the test rates


*Expected = Percent disease control expected as predicted by the Colby equation


*ppm = Parts per million


*Synergism factor = Observed/Expected













TABLE 7







Synergistic Interactions of the Compound of Formula I and Other Fungicides


In a 3-Day Curative (3DC) Zymoseptoria tritici (SEPTTR) Assay - Test 7.











Rates
SEPTTR
Synergism











Composition
(ppm)
Observed*
Expected*
Factor*














Mefentrifluconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.2 
82
74
1.11


Mefentrifluconazole + Compound I
0.05 + 0.1 
45
35
1.30


Fluopyram + Compound I
3.2 + 0.2
99
83
1.20


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.8 + 0.2
97
69
1.42


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.4 + 0.2
93
68
1.37


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.2 + 0.2
85
68
1.25


Fluopyram + Compound I
1.6 + 0.1
53
39
1.38


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.8 + 0.1
62
21
2.89


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.4 + 0.1
57
20
2.83


Fluopyram + Compound I
0.2 + 0.1
33
20
1.67


Fluopyram + Compound I
 1.6 + 0.05
40
31
1.29


Fluopyram + Compound I
 0.8 + 0.05
23
12
2.03


Fluopyram + Compound I
 0.4 + 0.05
22
10
2.17





*SEPTTR = Leaf Blotch of Wheat; Zymoseptoria tritici


*Observed = Observed percent disease control at the test rates


*Expected = Percent disease control expected as predicted by the Colby equation


*ppm = Parts per million


*Synergism factor = Observed/Expected





Claims
  • 1. A synergistic fungicidal mixture, comprising: a fungicidally effective amount of the compound of Formula I, (S)-1,1-bis(4-fluorophenyl) propan-2-yl (3-acetoxy-4-methoxypicolinoyl)-L-alaninate:
  • 2. The mixture of claim 1 wherein a concentration ratio of the compound of Formula I to tebuconazole is from about 2:1 to about 1:4.
  • 3. The mixture of claim 1 wherein a concentration ratio of the compound of Formula I to prothioconazole is from about 1:6.4 to about 1:52.
  • 4. The mixture of claim 1 wherein a concentration ratio of the compound of Formula I to difenoconazole is from about 2:1 to about 1:2.
  • 5. The mixture of claim 1 wherein a concentration ratio of the compound of Formula I to epoxiconazole is from about 4:1 to about 1:2.
  • 6. The mixture of claim 1 wherein a concentration ratio of the compound of Formula I to mefentrifluconazole is from about 4:1 to about 1:2.
  • 7. The mixture of claim 1, wherein the mixture provides control of a fungal pathogen, and the pathogen is the causal agent of leaf blotch of wheat (Zymoseptoria tritici).
  • 8. A synergistic, fungicidal composition comprising of a fungicidally effective amount of a mixture of claim 1 and an agriculturally acceptable carrier.
  • 9. A method of treating a plant for control of a fungal pathogen, wherein the mixture of claim 1 is applied to one of the plant, foliage of the plant, a plant seed, and an area adjacent to the plant.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a national phase entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of international patent application PCT/US18/030558, filed on May 2, 2018 and published in English as international patent publication WO2018204435 on Nov. 8, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/500,183 filed May 2, 2017, which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2018/030558 5/2/2018 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/204435 11/8/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (118)
Number Name Date Kind
4051173 Schacht Sep 1977 A
4588735 Spalz May 1986 A
5342835 Agrochimie Aug 1994 A
5397795 Valcke Mar 1995 A
5401871 Talley Mar 1995 A
5475132 Pepin et al. Dec 1995 A
5476868 Wingert et al. Dec 1995 A
5563165 Talley Oct 1996 A
5760068 Talley et al. Jun 1998 A
5852042 Jakobi Dec 1998 A
6355660 Ricks Mar 2002 B1
6410572 Schelberger Jun 2002 B1
6436421 Schindler Aug 2002 B1
6521622 Ricks Feb 2003 B1
6706740 Ricks Mar 2004 B2
6812237 Cowen et al. Nov 2004 B2
6812238 Fukuda et al. Nov 2004 B1
6861390 Meyer Mar 2005 B2
6903219 Niyaz Jun 2005 B2
6916932 Meyer Jul 2005 B2
6927225 Ricks Aug 2005 B2
6953807 Hutin et al. Oct 2005 B2
7034035 Ricks Apr 2006 B2
7183278 Imamura Feb 2007 B1
7241804 Hockenberry Jul 2007 B1
7250389 Sakanaka Jul 2007 B1
RE39991 Ricks Jan 2008 E
7442672 Muller Dec 2008 B2
7458581 Derrer Dec 2008 B1
7560565 Bacque Jul 2009 B2
7927617 Koltzenburg Apr 2011 B2
8008231 Leatherman Aug 2011 B2
8153819 Dietz Apr 2012 B2
8236962 Hoekstra Aug 2012 B2
8349877 Brix Jan 2013 B2
8415274 Wachendorff-Neumann Apr 2013 B2
8465562 Chen Jun 2013 B2
8470840 Klittich Jun 2013 B2
8476193 Keeney Jul 2013 B2
8580959 Devasthale Nov 2013 B2
8586550 Lee et al. Nov 2013 B2
8604215 Phiasivongsa Dec 2013 B2
8785479 Meyer Jul 2014 B2
8835462 Meyer Sep 2014 B2
8883811 Owen Nov 2014 B2
8916579 Boebel Dec 2014 B2
9006259 Boebel Jan 2015 B2
9084418 Ehr Jul 2015 B2
9131690 Meyer Sep 2015 B2
9144239 Meyer Sep 2015 B2
9155305 Gary Oct 2015 B2
9156816 Ito Oct 2015 B2
9179674 Martin Nov 2015 B2
9185911 Inami Nov 2015 B2
9198419 Owen Dec 2015 B2
9247741 DeLorbe Feb 2016 B2
9265253 Li Feb 2016 B2
9265255 Funke Feb 2016 B2
9271496 Kemmitt Mar 2016 B2
9271497 Lorsbach Mar 2016 B2
9414596 Hoekstra et al. Aug 2016 B2
9439422 Martin Sep 2016 B2
9482661 Ross Nov 2016 B2
9549555 DeLorbe Jan 2017 B2
9549556 DeKorver Jan 2017 B2
9629365 Li Apr 2017 B2
9681664 Lalonde Jun 2017 B2
9686984 DeKorver Jun 2017 B2
9700047 Lu Jul 2017 B2
9750248 Ouimette Sep 2017 B2
9828408 Kalayanov et al. Nov 2017 B2
9840475 Lorsbach Dec 2017 B2
9936697 Hopkins Apr 2018 B2
9955690 Owen May 2018 B2
9955691 Boebel May 2018 B2
9974304 DeKorver May 2018 B2
10015964 Ogawa et al. Jul 2018 B2
10015966 Taggi et al. Jul 2018 B2
20020119979 Degenhardt Aug 2002 A1
20020177578 Ricks Nov 2002 A1
20030018052 Ricks Jan 2003 A1
20030022902 Ricks Jan 2003 A1
20030022903 Ricks Jan 2003 A1
20050239873 Hockenberry Oct 2005 A1
20060167281 Meijer Jul 2006 A1
20070010401 Noon Jan 2007 A1
20070066629 Tormo i Blasco Mar 2007 A1
20090203770 Hockenberry Aug 2009 A1
20090306142 Carson Dec 2009 A1
20100016163 Keiper Jan 2010 A1
20110070278 Lopez Mar 2011 A1
20110082162 Lorsbach Apr 2011 A1
20120245031 Gewehr Sep 2012 A1
20130296372 Owen Nov 2013 A1
20140051678 Clement-Schatlo Feb 2014 A1
20140187587 Ouimette et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140357713 Damaj Dec 2014 A1
20150181874 Owen et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150289508 Meyer Oct 2015 A1
20150322051 Lu Nov 2015 A1
20160037774 Schulz Feb 2016 A1
20160183526 Hopkins Jun 2016 A1
20160183527 Hopkins Jun 2016 A1
20170183324 Li Jun 2017 A1
20170360038 Yao Jun 2017 A1
20170273303 DeKorver Sep 2017 A1
20170273306 Lalonde Sep 2017 A1
20170290333 Bravo-Altamirano Oct 2017 A1
20170295792 Bravo-Altamirano Oct 2017 A1
20170369421 Yao Dec 2017 A1
20180000075 Bravo-Altamirano et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180000080 Buchan Jan 2018 A1
20180000084 Yao Jan 2018 A1
20180000085 Bravo-Altamirano et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180002288 Buchan Jan 2018 A1
20180002319 Wilmot Jan 2018 A1
20180002320 Wilmot Jan 2018 A1
20180037541 Yao Feb 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (33)
Number Date Country
2015001862 Oct 2015 CL
101530104 Sep 2009 CN
106359395 Feb 2017 CN
2649699 Jan 1991 FR
19940026884 Sep 1995 JP
1998053583 Feb 1998 JP
H10-045747 Feb 1998 JP
1996010016 Apr 1996 WO
199637472 Nov 1996 WO
199741103 Jun 1997 WO
1997019908 Jun 1997 WO
1998018751 May 1998 WO
1999011127 Nov 1999 WO
2000076979 Dec 2000 WO
200114339 Mar 2001 WO
2005121069 Dec 2005 WO
2008079387 Jul 2008 WO
2012020777 Aug 2011 WO
2012016989 Feb 2012 WO
2016109301 Dec 2012 WO
WO 2013007767 Jan 2013 WO
2013136275 Sep 2013 WO
2016007525 Jul 2015 WO
2016109288 Dec 2015 WO
2016109289 Dec 2015 WO
2016109290 Dec 2015 WO
2016109291 Dec 2015 WO
2016109300 Dec 2015 WO
2016109302 Dec 2015 WO
2016109303 Dec 2015 WO
2016109304 Dec 2015 WO
2016109305 Dec 2015 WO
2015005355 Mar 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (52)
Entry
Issac, S., “What is the mode of action of fungicides and how do fungi develop resistance?” Mycologist, vol. 13, Part 1, pp. 38-39 (1999).
Leonard, P.K., “Resistance risk evaluation, ‘a European regulatory perspective,’” Crop Protection, vol. 19, pp. 905-909 (2000).
Anonymous, Synergistic Fungicidal Composition of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amides and Triazoles, IP.COM Journal, IP.COM, Electronic Publication, West Henrietta, NY, US, Jul. 2004, 11 pages.
Backman, P., Fungicide Formulation: Relationship to Biological Activity, Ann. Rev. Phytopathol, 1978, 16, pp. 211-237.
BASF New Fungicide Xemium Got Full Approval in EU, Agronews, Jul. 18, 2012 [retrieved on Feb. 4, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: ,URL:http://news.agropages.com/News/NewsDetail—7386.htm, 1 page.
Bolton, M. et al., “Wheat leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 9, No. 5, 2008, pp. 563-575 [online] [retrieved on Feb. 3, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Melvin_Bolton/publication/23483068_Wheat_leaf_rust_caused_by_Puccinia_triticina/links/0046352d94b8d5f2c9000000.pdf.
Davari, M. et al. “Quantum Chemical Investigation of Intramolecular Thione-Thiol Tautomerism of 1, 2, 4-triazole-3-thione and its disubstituted derivatives,” Journal of Molecular Modeling, Sep. 2009, 16(5), pp. 841-855.
Cantacuzene, D., “Optimization of the papain catalyzed esterification of amino acids by alcohols and diols,” Tetrahedron 45, 3 (1989): 741-748.
FRAC Code List: Fungicides Sorted by Mode of Action (including FRAC Code numbering), Fungicide Resistance Action Committee, Dec. 2008, 10 pages.
Fungicidal Mixtures, IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure, (Jul. 5, 2005), XP055073888, DOI: http://ip.com/pdf/ipcompad/IPCOM000126160D.pdf, 12 pages.
Gisi, U., “Synergistic Interaction of Fungicides in Mixtures,” The American Phytopathology Society, vol. 86, No. 11, 1996, pp. 1273-1279.
Guseynov et al: “Study of the reaction of aminoacetic acid with dihydric alcohols and production of epoxy esters” Chemical Problems, 2009 (1), pp. 188-190.
Hu, Z. et al., “Synthesis of Novel Analogues of Antimycin A3,” Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008), pp. 5192-5195.
Huang, C. et al., “Synergistic Interactions between Chitinase ChiCW and Fungicides Against Plant Fungal Pathogens,” J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2008, 18(4), pp. 784-787.
Kissling, E., “Crop Protection Pipeline Value Jumps to Euro 2.4 Billion,” BASF SE, Mar. 10, 2011 [retrieved on Feb. 4, 2014], Retrieved from the internet: ,URL:http://agro.basf.com/agri/AP-lnternet/en/content/news_room/news/basf-crop-protection-pipeline-value, 4 pages.
Koyanagi, T. et al., “Bioisoterism in Agrochemicals,” Synthesis and Chemistry of Agrochemicals IV; Baker, D. et al., ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 15-24.
Latin, R., et al., “Re-Examining Fungicide Synergism for Dollar Spot Control,” GCM, Juky 2008, pp. 84-87.
Ueki, M., et al., “UK-2A, B, C, and D, Novel Antifungal Antibiotics from Streptomyces sp. 517-02 I. Fermentation, solation, and Biological Properties,” The Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 49, No. 7, Jul. 1996, pp. 639-634.
O'Sullivan, E., et al., “Fungicide Resistance—an Increasing Problem,” Proceedings of National Tillage Conference 2007, Published by Crop Research Centre, Oak Park, Carlow, Jan. 31, 2007, pp. 43-56.
Parker, J.E., et al., “Mechanism of Binding of Prothioconazole to Mycosphaerella graminicola CYP51 Differs from That of Other Azole Antifungals,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, No. 4, Feb. 2011, pp. 1460-1465.
PubChem: Open Chemistry Database, Substance Record for SID 74383515. Deposit Date Jun. 11, 2009 [retrieved on May 25, 2016] Retrieved from internet. <URL:https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/substance/74383515#section=Top>, 5 pages.
Science for a Better Life, Bayer CropScience “Positioned for Growth”, Jun. 2008, 22 pages.
Calcium Dodecyl Benzene Sulfonate, CAS 26264-06-2, (http://www.hichem.com/product/showproduct.php?id=334639) Mar. 28, 2013, 6 pages.
Tani, K et al., “UK2A, B, C, and D, Novel Antifungal Antibiotics—from Streptomyces sp. 517-02.,” The Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 55, No. 3, Mar. 2002, pp. 315-321.
The Merck Index, Twelfth Edition, S. Budavari, Ed., Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996, pp. 2220, 3666, 7937 and 7946.
Usuki, Y., et al., “Semi-synthesis and biological evaluation of analogues of UK-2A, a novel antifungal antibiotic from Streptomyces sp. 517-02,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 15, No. 8, 2005, pp. 2011-2014.
Usuki, Y. et al., “UK-2A, B, C, and D, Novel Antifungal Antibiotics from Streptomyces sp. 517-02 VI (2). Structure-activity Relationships of UK-2A,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 55, No. 6, Jun. 2002, pp. 607-610.
Webster's New Worid Dictionary, Second College Edition, Guralnik, D, Ed., The World Publishing Co., New York, p. 1127 (1972).
Wilson, C.L. et al. “Fruit Volatiles Inhibitory to Monilinia Fruiticola and Botrytis cinerea,” 1987, Plant Disease, vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 316-319.
Goellner et al. “Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the causal agent of Asian soybean rust.” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 169-177 (2010).
Fujita T, Ed. “Quantitative structure-activity analysis and database-aided bioisosteric structural transformation procedure as methodologies of agrochemical design”; Classical and Three Dimensional QSAR in Agrochemistry, ACS Symposium Series Washington, D.C. vol. 606, pp. 13-34 (1995).
Patani et al. Biosterism: A rational approach in drug design. Chemical Reviews, vol. 96, No. 8, pp. 3147-3176 (1996).
Kendall, S. et al. “Changes in sensitivity to DMI fungicides in Rhynchosporium secalis”. Crop Protection, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 357-362 (1993).
Cooke et al. “The effect of fungicide programmes based on epoxiconazole on the control and DMI sensitivity of Rhynchosporium secalis in winter barley.” Crop Protection, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 393-406 (2004).
Shimano et al. “Total synthesis of the antifungal dilactones UK-2A and UK-3a: The determination of their relative and absolute configurations, analog synthesis and antifungal activities”. Tetrahedron, vol. 54, pp. 12745-12774 (1998).
Lippard, S. “Chemical Synthesis: The Art of Chemistry”. Nature, vol. 416, p. 587 (2002).
Washburn, W.N., “Identification of a nonbasic melanin hormone receptor 1 antagonist as an antiobesity clinical candidate ” Journal of medicinal chemistry 57, 18 (Aug. 28, 2014): 7509-7522.
Amiri et al. “Sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea field isolates to the novel succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors fluopyram, penthiopyrad, and fluxapuroxad”. Annual Meeting of the American Phytopathological Society, Phytopathology, vol. 102 (2012).
Chitwood, D. “Nematicides”. Encyclopedia of Agrochemicals (3), pp. 1104-1115, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, http://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/43874/PDF (2003).
Hanafi et al. “UK2A, B, C, and D, Novel Antifungal Antibiotics from Streptomyces sp 517-02 II. Structural Elucidation.” The Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 49, Issue 12, pp. 1226-1231 (1996).
Shibata et al. “UK1, A Novel Cytotoxic Metabolite from Streptomyces sp. 517-02 II. Structural Elucidation.” The Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 46, Issue 7, pp. 1095-1100 (1993).
Shimano et al. “Enantioselective Total Synthesis of the Antifungal Dilactone, UK-2A: The Determination of the Relative and Absolute Configurations”. Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 39, pp. 4363-4366 (1998).
Stephenson, G., et al. “Glossary of terms relating to pesticides”. Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 78, No. 11, pp. 2075-2154, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (2006).
Ueki, M., et al., “UK-1, A Novel Cytotoxic Metabolite from Streptomyces sp. 517-02 I. Taxonomy, Fermentation, Isolation, Physico-chemical and Biological Properties.” The Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1089-1094 (1993).
Ueki et al. “UK-3A, A Novel Antifungal Antibiotic from Streptomyces sp. 517-02: Fermentation, Isolation, Structural Elucidation and Biological Properties”. The Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 50, Issue 7, pp. 551-555 (1997).
Ueki et al. “The mode of action of UK-2A and UK-3A, Novel antifungal antibiotics from Streptomyces sp. 517-02”. The Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 50, Issue 12, pp. 1052-1057 (1997).
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US14/58061 dated Dec. 15, 2014, 9 pages.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US1458065 dated Dec. 22, 2014, 9 pages.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US1528407 dated Aug. 5, 2015, 8 pages.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US1539407 dated Sep. 30, 2015, 9 pages.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US1539409 dated Oct. 5, 2015, 10 pages.
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US1544383 dated Mar. 16, 2016, 11 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200077657 A1 Mar 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62500183 May 2017 US