Synergistic mixtures of selected amino acids

Abstract

Novel synergistic fungicidal compositions used for protecting seeds, plants and other vegetative material against fungi contain a mixture of one or more compounds selected from group A and one or more compounds selected from group B. Compounds from group A are selected from β-Amino butyric acid and its N-benzoyl-octyl ester derivatives. Compounds from group B are selected from the group of fosetyl aluminum, dimethomorph, a mixture of folpet and ofurace (45:5), folpet, fencaramid (Bayer SZX), mancozeb, cymoxanil, methalaxyl, the single optical isomer of metalaxyl, a mixture of cymoxanil and mancozeb (4:1), copper sulfate, copper hydroxide, copper sulfate hydrate, azoxystrobin, and acibenzolar-s-methyl.

Description

INTRODUCTION

[0001] The present invention concerns synergistic fungicidal mixtures. The present invention more particularly concerns synergistic mixture of β-aminobutyric acid (hereinafter referred to as BABA) and its N-benzoyl-octyl ester derivatives for the control of plant diseases.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] Fungicides are often combined in mixtures for 3 main reasons: 1. to widen the spectrum of antifungal activity to control several diseases occurring simultaneously in a crop 2. to exploit synergistic interaction between fungicides, by which the overall activity is increased and the concentration of the compounds reduced, and 3. to delay the selection process of resistant fungal individuals to one component of the mixture (Gisi, Phytopathology 86 1273-1279,1996).

[0003] Avoidence of plant disease in agricultural production may be accomplished not only by using fungicides or fungicidal mixtures but also by using “plant activators”, molecules which enhance the natural resistance (defense) of the plant. Such activators which have no direct fungicidal effect on the pathogen (Ryals et al The Plant Cell 8: 1809-1819,1996), induce systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in the plant several days after application (Ibid).

[0004] To date only few molecules were reported to induce SAR in crop plants viz. salicylic acid (SA), 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA) benzol (1,2,3) thiadiazole-7-carbothiouic acid S-methyl ester (BTH) (Ibid), and DL-3-amino butyric acid (BABA, Cohen et al Plant Physiology 104: 56-59,1994).

[0005] However whereas SA, INA or BTH have to be applied to the crop ahead of infestation (Ryals, et al Ibid) BABA can be applied post—infectionaly (Cohen et al Ibid).

[0006] The idea behind the present invention is to combine two methods of disease control—the direct—kill method operating on the target pathogen and the indirect method of activating the natural defense approach of the crop plant. Such two methods are combined by using mixtures of a fungicide or fungicides (direct—kill) with BABA or its N-benzoyl-octyl ester derivative(SAR).

[0007] We show here that such mixtures are synergistic in controlling plant diseases.

OBJECTIVES OF THE INVENTION

[0008] It is the objective of the present invention to provide novel mixtures of fungicides of β-aminobutyric acids. It is an objective of the present invention to provide a synergistic mixture of BABA and/or its N-benzoyl-octyl ester derivative with various other fungicides.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0009] In accordance with the present invention there is provided synergistic fungicidal compositions comprising one or more compounds selected from Group A and one or more compounds selected from Group B, wherein the compounds of Group A are selected from the group consisting of DL-3 aminobutyric-acid and its N-Benzoyl octyl ester, and the compounds of Group B are selected from the group consisting of fosetyl aluminum, dimethomorph, a mixture of folpet and ofturace (45:5), folpet, fencaramid (Bayer SZX), mancozeb, cymoxanil, methalaxyl, the single optical isomer of metalaxyl, a mixture of cymoxamil and mancozeb (4:1), copper sulfate, copper hydroxide, copper sulfate hydrate, azoxystrobin, and acibenzolar-s-methyl.

[0010] The present invention also provides an improved method of controlling fungi, especially late blight and downy mildews, applying to the plant a composition containing an effective amount of one of these mixtures. The present invention further provides an improved method of controlling phytophthora infertan in potato or tomatoe, Pseudoperonospora cubensis in cucumber or melon, Plasmopera viticola in grapes, and Peronospora tabacina in tabacco.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0011] Methodology

[0012] Plants 1. Potato (cultivar Alpha) were grown from tubers in 1 liter pots in sandy soil in the greenhouse. At 5 weeks after planting when they had several shoots in a pot, with 10-12 leaves per shoot, plants were taken for assays.

[0013] 2. Cucumber (cultivate Dlila) plants were grown from seed in 0.251 liter pots containing sandy soil in the greenhouse. At 3 weeks after sowing, when they developed 2 leaves they were used.

[0014] 3. Grapes (cultivate Superior) plants were grown from cuttings (first in perlite and then in sandy soil) in pots in the greenhouse. At 8 weeks after planting leaves were detached for experiments.

[0015] Fungal Pathogens. Potatoes were inoculated with sporangic of Phytophthora infestans (resistant to metalaxyl). Cucumbers were inoculated with sporangia of Pseudoperonospora cubensis (resistance to metalaxyl). Grapes were inoculated with Plasmopara viticola Chemicals.

[0016] 1. DLβ-amino-butanoic acid (BABA)

[0017] 2. DL-4-benzoyl-3-amino butanoic acid octylester (039-81)

[0018] 3. Cymoxanil (Curzate)

[0019] 4. phosetyl-aluminium (Alliette)

[0020] 5. Mancozeb

[0021] 6. Folpet

[0022] 7. Metalaxyl, metalaxyl-Gold

[0023] 8. Copper sulphate, copper hydroxide

[0024] 9. (Mancozeb+dimethomorph, prepacked 600 g+90 g a.i. per 1 kg)

[0025] 10. (Mancozeb+metalaxyl, prepacked 560 g+75 g a.i. per 1 kg)

[0026] 11. Folpet+ofurace, 450 g+60 g a.i. per 1 kg)

[0027] 12. Bayer-SZX (Fencaramid)

[0028] 13. Mancozeb+Cymoxanil (4:1)

[0029] 14. Azoxystrobin

[0030] 15. Acibenzolar-s-methyl

[0031] 16. Dimethomorph

[0032] Except BABA which was dissolved in water, all other chemicals or prepacked mixtures produced a suspension or emulsion in water.

[0033] Spraying The chemicals were sprayed onto the upper leaf surfaces of either potatoes or cucumbers with the aid of a fine glass atomizer. Control plants were sprayed with water. Experiments with grapes were carried out using 12 mm leaf discs floating on 1 ml of the test compound(s) in 24-well titer plates, upperside down.

[0034] Inoculation

[0035] Potatoes and cucumbers were inoculated one day after spraying. Grape leaf discs were inoculated soon after floating. Inoculation of potato was done by spraying the upper leaf surfaces of the plants with a sporangial suspension containing 2000 sporangia/ml. Sporangia were harvested 0.5 h before inoculation from infected potato tuber slices. Cucumbers were sprayed with a sporangial suspension containing 1500 sporangia/ml. Sporangia were harvested from infected cucumber plants kept in humid growth chambers (at 15° C.). Leaf discs of grapes were inoculated with 2 sporangial droplets containing each 300 sporangia. Sporangia were harvested from infected leaves kept in petri dishes on wet filter paper at 15° C. Inoculated plants or titer plates were placed in a dew chamber at 18° C. overnight and then transferred to a growth chamber at 20° C. (12 h light/day 100 pE.m−2.S−1) for symptom production (late blight in potato and downy mildew in cucumber), or for sporulation of P. viticola in grape leaf discs.

[0036] General Procedure for Tabacco

[0037] One month old tobacco plants (cv.xanthi nc.). were sprayed onto their foliage with the test compounds. Two days later they were inoculated with 104 spores/ml of Perouospora latacin of either the S or the R strain. Inoculated plants were placed in 100% relative humidity over night and then incubated at 20° C. with 12 h light/day. A week after innoculation plants were again placed at 100%-RH at 18° C. in the dark to induce fungal sporulation. Sporulation was quantitated by removing 2 cm2 leaf discs from each leaf and counting with the aid of a haemocytometer. The extent of sporulation inhibition was calculated relative to that in control (untreated) inoculated plants. Edgo was computed after linear regression and of was calculated according to Wadely.

[0038] General Procedure for Grapes

[0039] Leaf discs (2-cm2) were removed from the top leaves of grape plants (cv. Superior) grown in the greenhouse. Discs were floated (lower surface uppermost on the test solutions over filter paper of 9 cm diameter). Petri dishes. Leaf discs were immediately innoculated with 2 (10 ml) droplets of sporangial suspension (104/ml) of Plasmopara viticola per disc. Dishes were inculcated at 20° C. with 12 h light/day for 10 days until fungal sporulation was quantified.

[0040] Disease Assessment

[0041] At the time intervals post inoculation specified in the Examples, infected leaf area in potato and cucumber was assessed visually. In control inoculated plants most or all of the foliage (80-100%) was devastated by the disease. Percentage control of the disease by a chemical treatment was calculated as

% control=(1−x/y)×100

[0042] whereas

[0043] x=proportion leaf area diseased in treated plants

[0044] and

[0045] y=proportion leaf area diseased in control plants.

[0046] In grapes, proportion of leaf discs showing sporulation were similarly used.

[0047] Calculation of Control Efficacy and Synergism

[0048] Each chemical and each mixture was applied to plants at various doses of the active ingredient. Dose—response curves were produced and transferred to log—dose probit response curves as described by Kosman and Cohen (Phytopatholagy 86: 1263-1272, 1996). ED90 values (dose required for achieving 90% control of the disease) taken from the log-probit 7 curves were used to calculate the Cotoxicity Factor (CF) according to the Wadely procedure (Kosman and Cohen, Ibid; Gisi phytopatcology 86: 1273-1279,1966). “CF” is defined as the ratio between the expected dose and the observed dose that provide the same level of disease control (Kosman and Cohen, Ibid). The observed dose of each component of a mixture is taken from the experiment and the expected dose of all mixture made of that components is calculated by the Wadely formula: 1${\mathrm{ED}}_{90}\mathrm{expected}=\frac{a+b}{\frac{a}{{\mathrm{ED}}_{90}\mathrm{obs}.A}+\frac{b}{{\mathrm{ED}}_{90}\mathrm{obs}.B}}$

[0049] where a and b are the absolute amounts of the components A and B in a mixture and ED90. obs.A and Ed90 obs.B are the ED90 values of A and B obtained by the experiment. CF values of>2.0 are considered to represent a strongly synergistic mixture (Gisi, Ibid).

[0050] According to a further feature of the invention, there is provided a fungicidal composition which comprises a compound of the invention together with carrier. The active compound can be employed as a wide variety of formulations, for example as an aqueous dispersion, a dispersible powder, as seed dressing, granules or dust. As a dispersion the composition comprises an active compound together with a dispersing agent dispersed in a liquid medium, preferably water. It can be in a form of a concentrated primary composition which requires dilution with a suitable quantity of water or other diluent before application. Such primary compositions are a convenient way of supplying the consumer and preferred example is a dispersible powder. A dispersible powder comprises an active compound, a dispersing agent and solid carrier. The latter can be, for example, kaolin, talc, or diatomaceous earth and in addition, the dispersible powder can contain a wetting agent.

[0051] Other formulations include seed dressing, granules or dusts, in all of which the active compound is associated with a solid carrier and which are intended for direct application. They can be made by methods well known in the art. Preferably all compositions comprising a solid carrier are made by mixing the active compound in particulate form with a particulate carrier.

[0052] The concentration of the active compound in the composition of the inventioncan vary widely. In the case of a primary composition it is preferably from 15% to 95% by weight, more especially from 50% to 80% by weight. A composition intended for direct application to a crop preferably comprises from 0.001% to 10% more, especially from 0,005% to 5% by weight of the active compound, although the aerial spraying of a crop is contemplated compositions having higher concentrations, for example up to 30% by weight may be chosen in preference.

[0053] The fungicidal composition of the present invention may be applied as a ready-mixed composition, as a tank mix, or applying the compounds of each group separately.

[0054] Following the methods outlined above numerous mixtures were prepared and their activity against a variety of diseases were studied. The results of 35 studies are listed in Tables 1-35.

[0055] While the invention will now be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments in the following examples it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to these particular embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as be included within the scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims. Thus, the following examples which iclude preferred embodiments, will serve to illustrate the practice of this invention, it being understood that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of preferred embodiments of the present invention only and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of procedures as well as of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention.

TABLE 1
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY BABA
COPPER SULFATE HYDRATE MIXTUREa
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	2	8	32	125	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA	—	—	—	0	0	0	13	2678	—
Cu+2	—	0	0	63	83	—	—	143
BABA + Cu+2	80 + 20	0	0	13	88	—	—	126	4.7
	70 + 30	0	0	50	93	—	—	101	4.2
	60 + 40	0	0	85	93	—	—	85	3.9
a5 days post inoculation
bControl plants showed 100% leaf blight

[0056]

TABLE 2
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY BABA
CYMOXANIL MIXTURE (CURZATER)a
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA	—		3	24	18	64	1498	—
Cymoxanil	—	36	73	64	98		128	—
BABA +	80 + 20	9	9	3	79	—	294	1.6
Cymoxanil	50 + 50	73	76	82	98	—	114	2.1
a 5 days post inoculation
b Control plants showed 83% leaf blight

[0057]

TABLE 3
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY BABA
FOSETYL ALUMINUM MIXTUREa
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Comounds	Ratio	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
Cultivar Carab
BABA		9	9	9	24	3233	—
Fosetyl − Al		9	24	24	70	1390	—
BABA +	75 + 25	9	9	39	70	1311	1.9
Fosetyl − Al	25 + 75	9	9	39	79	1142	1.4
Cultivar Dragac
BABA		0	0	0	53	1533	—
Fosetyl − Al		33	33	50	93	856	—
BABA +	75 + 25	67	67	93	93	639	1.7
Fosetyl − Al	25 + 75	0	0	93	100	245	3.9
a 5 days post inoculation
b Contact plants showed 83% leaf blight
c Contact plants showed 38% leaf blight

[0058]

TABLE 4
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY BABA
MIXTURES OF MANCOZEB + DIMETHOMORPH MIXTURESa
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA	—	—	3	24	18	64	1498	—
MANCOZEB +	—	70	73	82	98	—	115	—
DIMETHOMORPH
BABA +	80 + 20	64	73	70	82	—	287	1.5
(MANCOZEBC +	50 + 50	85	70	70	91	—	189	1.1
DIMETHOMORPH)

[0059]

TABLE 5
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY BABA
FOLPET/OFURACE (45 + 5) MIXTUREa
		Percent Disease Controlb
		@ mg/L Active Ingredient -	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	14	14	14	36	2617
FOLPET/		77	89	99	100	—	19
OFURACE
BABA +
(FOLPET/	50 + 50	74	81	99	100	—	22	1.8
OFURCE)
a 7 days
b Control plants showed 88% leaf blight

[0060]

TABLE 6
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY BABA
FOLPET - CYMOXANIL MIXTUREa
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		22	22	22	69	1481
FOLPET		81	95	98	100	84
CYMOXANIL		83	86	91	100	183
BABA + FOLPET	60 + 25 + 15	72	89	98	100	95	2.5
+ CYMOXANIL
	25 + 60 + 15	92	86	95	100	104	1.3
a 6 day post innoculation
b Control plants showed 80% leaf blight

[0061]

TABLE 7
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY THE
N - BENZOYL OCTYL ESTER OF BABA AND FENCARAMIDa
		Percent Disease Control
Com-		mg/L Active Ingredientb	ED90
pounds	Ratio	2	8	32	125	250	1000	2000	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	—	—	15	25	50	53	2395
Deriv-
ative
Fenc-		0	50	98	100	—	—	—	19
aramid
BABA
DERI-	80 + 20	44	63	85	100	—	—	—	31	3.0
VAT-
IVE +
FENC-	90 + 10	13	50	56	94	—	—	—	97	1.8
ARA-
MID

[0062]

TABLE 8
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY N-BENZOYL
OCTYL ESTER OF BABA, Cu (OH)2, (as 50% a.i), MANCOZEBa
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
N-benzoyl octyl		—	3	25	25	75	1261
ester derivative of
BABA
Cu(OH)2		0	0	13	75	—	298
Cu(OH)2 +	70 + 30	0	3	44	50	—	416
Mancozeb

[0063]

TABLE 9
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY
N-BENZOYL OCTYL ESTER DERIVATIVE OF
FOLPET/OFURACE (45 + 5) AND THEIR MIXTURESa
		Percent Disease Control
		@ mg/L Active Ingredientb	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
N-benzoyl octyl		—	0	0	0	25	2011
ester derivative
of BABA
Folpet +		0	0	3	73	—	301
Ofurace (9 + 1)
N-benzoyl octyl

[0064]

TABLE 10
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY
N-BENZOYL OCTYL ESTER DERIVATIVE OF BABA,
AND MANCOZEB + CYMOXANIL; 4:1 AND THEIR MIXTURESa
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
N-benzoyl octyl		—	0	0	0	25	2011
ester derivative
of BABA
Mancozeb +		0	25	25	75	—	313
Cymoxanil
N-benzoyl octyl	67:33	25	68	70	95	—	169	4.3
ester derivative	50:50	5	63	88	98	—	95	5.7

[0065]

TABLE 11
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY
N-BENZOYL OCTYL ESTER DERIVATIVE OF BABA,
FOLPET AND THEIR MIXTURESa
		Percent Disease Controlb
Com-		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
pounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	500	1000	2000	mg/L	CF
N-									1514
benzoyl
octyl
ester		—	—	—	63	69	85	89
deriv-
ative
of
BABA
Folpet		70	75	90	95	—	—	—	141
N-	80 + 20	50	80	85	93	—	—	—	167	3.1
benzoyl	67 + 33	13	76	86	96	—	—	—	130	2.8
octyl	33 + 67	63	76	78	88	—	—	—	224	0.9
ester	33 + 67	63	76	78	88	—	—	—	224	0.9
deriv-
ative
of
BA-
BA +
Folpet
a 4 days post innoculation
b Control plants showed 100% leaf blight

[0066]

TABLE 12
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY
N-BENZOYL OCTYL ESTER DERIVATIVE OF BABA,
FENCARAMID (BAYER SZX) AND THEIR MIXTURESa
		Percent Disease Controlb
Com-		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
pounds	Ratio	2	8	31	25	500	1000	2000	mg/L	CF
N-										—
benzoyl
octyl
ester		—	—	—	15	25	50	53	3204
deriv-
ative
of
BABA
Fenc-		0	50	98	100	—	—	—	19	—
aramid
										—
N-	90:10	13	50	56	94	—	—	—	83	2.2
benzoyl	80:20	44	63	85	100	—	—	—	31	3.0
octyl
ester
deriv-
ative
of
BABA
+
Fenc-
armid
a 5 days post innoculation
b Control plants showed 100% leaf blight

[0067]

TABLE 13
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY BABA,
COPPER SULPHATE HYDRATE (EXPRESSED AS mg/L Cu++)
AND THEIR MIXTURESa
	Percent Disease Controlb
	mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		43	43	57	72	1468
	Percent Disease Controlb
	mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	2	8	32	125	mg/L	CF
Cu++		57	72	80	89	105
BABA + Cu++	80 + 20	72	72	86	89	102	4.0

[0068]

TABLE 14
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY BABA,
(EXPRESSED AS Cu(OH)2)
(Cu(OH)2 + MANCOZEB) AND THEIR MIXTURES
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	33	33	50	67	1576
Cu(OH)2		67	67	77	80	—	304
Cu(OH)2 + mancozeb	70 + 30	67	67	83	93	—	174

[0069]

TABLE 15
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY BABA
(FOLPET/OFURACE 45 + 5)
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	0	29	57	71	1273	—
Vamin		43	57	71	91	—	206	—
BABA + Vamin	67 + 33	14	21	57	97	—	166	2.8
	50 + 50	14	43	71	89		217	2.1
	33 + 67	29	57	74	89		214	1.3

[0070]

TABLE 16
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW CUCUMBER BY BABA
AND (MANCOZEB + CYMOXANIL; 4:1)
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	0	29	57	71	1273	—
(Mancozeb +			14	80	97	100	33	—
Cymoxanil)
BABA +	67 + 33	21	57	77	97	—	135	0.7
(Mancozeb +	50+:50	57	74	100	100	—	20	3.2
Cymoxanil)	33+:67	29	94	100	100	—	14	3.5
a 7 days post innoculation
b Control plants were 88% infected

[0071]

TABLE 17
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY
BABA + (MANCOZEB + METALAXYL)
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	0	15	3	59	1443	—
Mancozeb + Metalaxyl		34	53	71	82	—	268	—
BABA + Mancozeb +	88 + 12	0	0	9	96	—	221	4.3
Metalaxyl	75 + 25	18	44	53	81	—	281	2.4
	50 + 50	38	76	76	96	—	150	3.0
a 6 days post innoculation
b Control plants were 88% infected

[0072]

TABLE 18
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY
BABA, FOLPET & METALAXYLa 87:13)
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/LF	CF
BABA		—	0	15	3	59	1443	—
Folpet & Metalaxy		0	0	56	76	—	280	—
(87 + 13)
BABA + [Folpet +	88 + 12	12	0	59	81	—	260	3.7
metalaxyl]	75 + 25	68	53	56	71	—	393	1.8
	50 + 50	0	38	62	68	—	339	1.4

[0073]

TABLE 19
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY BABA;
FOLPET & METALAXYLa, (7 + 1) (MANCOZEB +
METALAXYL), (FOLPET + OFURACE) AND THEIR MIXTURES
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	12	19	25	31	3218
Folpet + metalaxyl		62	82	90	97	—	112

[0074]

TABLE 20
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY
BABA, METALAXYL SINGLE ISOMER MANCOZEB
AND THEIR MIXTURESa
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	8	8	8	38	2155
mancozeb		0	8	23	72	—	315
Metalaxyl Single		0	0	0	8	—	844
Isomer
BABA +	55 + 40 + 5	23	23	54	75	—	313	2.0
mancozeb +	50 + 40 + 10	38	25	31	80		314	2.0
Metalaxyl	40 + 40 + 20	8	15	8	31		689	0.9
Single Isomer	45 + 50 + 5	8	8	54	72		309	1.7
	40 + 50 + 10	8	31	54	89		228	2.3
	30 + 50 + 10	8	15	31	83		273	1.9
	35 + 60 + 5	54	54	78	86		239	2.0
	30 + 60 + 10	46	38	54	85		268	1.7
	20 + 60 + 20	61	69	69	83		281	1.6
	25 + 70 + 5	38	46	78	97		139	3.0
	20 + 70 + 10	38	23	63	94		194	2.1
	10 + 70 + 20	38	69	23	78		362	1.1
a 6 days post innoculation
b Control plants were 81% infected

[0075]

TABLE 21
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY BABA,
ALIETTE, CYMOXANIL AND THEIR MIXTURES
		Percent Disease Controla
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		37	67	76	85	975	—
Aliette		45	85	98	99	245	—
Cymoxanil		0	20	58	72	1229	—
BABA + Aliette +	60 + 25 + 15	63	70	88	95	584	1.0
Cymoxanil	25 + 60 + 15	70	85	98	100	100	3.4

[0076]

TABLE 22
CONTROL OF DOWNEY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY
BABA, MANCOZEB, CYMOXANIL AND THEIR MIXTURES
		Percent Disease Controla
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	4	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	0	13	50	63	1413	—
Mancozeb		75	87	90	92	—	167	—
Cymoxanil		13	25	38	50	—	506	—
BABA + Manco-	60 + 25 + 15	63	75	83	95		152	3.0
zeb + Cymoxanil	25 + 60 + 15	75	87	90	95		136	1.8

[0077]

TABLE 23
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY
BABA, BAYER SZX (FENCARAMID) AND THEIR MIXTURES
		Percent Disease Controlb
Com-		@ mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
pounds	Ratio	2	8	31	125	500	1000	2000	mg/L	CF
BABA						61	72	74	2354
FENC-		78	83	95	100				19
ARA-
MID
BABA	80 + 20	38	58	83	100				33	2.8
+	50 + 50	60	80	98	100				14	2.7
FENC-	20 + 80	78	85	98	100				13	1.8
ARA-
MID
a 5 days post innoculation
b Control plants were 81% infected

[0078]

TABLE 24
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY BABA,
BAYER DIMETHOMORPH (DMN)AND
THEIR MIXTURES
			Percent Disease Controlb
	Compounds	Ratio	@ mg/L Active Ingredient
	BABA 1000	gave	17% Control
	DMN 5 ppm	gave	32% Control
	BABA + DMN	gave	74% Control
	1000 + 5 ppm
2 $$ Synergy ⁢   ⁢ ratio = 74 = 74 17 = 32 - ( 17 ⁢   ⁢ 32 ) ⁢   ⁢ 33 100 = 2.24 &AutoRightMatch;

[0079]

TABLE 25
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY BABA,
FOLPET, CYMOXANIL AND THEIR MIXTURESa
		Percent Disease
		Controlb mg/L
		@ Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		6	22	48	82	1072
FOLPET		43	84	95	97	403
		48	63	82	97	524
BABA + FOLPET +	25 + 60 + 15	76	87	95	99	247	2.0
CYMOXANIL
a 5 days post inoculation
b Control plants were 95% infected

[0080]

TABLE 26
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN CUCUMBER BY BABA
PHOSETYL-ALUMINIUM
AND THEIR MIXTURESa
		Percent Disease Controlb
		mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio	16	62	250	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA		10	43	43	71	1386	—
Phosetyl-Aluminium		71	71	94	86	638	—
BABA +	12 + 88	43	43	86	100	261	4.7
Phosetyl-Aluminium	25 + 75	0	14	71	97	551	1.9
	50 + 50	0	14	57	83	1009	0.9
	75 + 25	—	57	57	86	918	0.8
	88 + 12	14	29	71	86	931	0.7
a 7 days post innoculation
b control plants were 88% infected

[0081]

TABLE 27
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN POTATO BY BABA, BION
AND THEIR MIXTURESa
		Percent Disease
		Control mg/L
		Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio (w/w)	250	500	1000	mg/L	CF
BABA	38	75	93	776	—
BION	13	25	78	1173	—
BABA +		38	78	98	639	1.3
ACIBENZOLAR-
S-METHYL (10 + 1)

[0082]

TABLE 28
CONTROL OF LATE BLIGHT IN TOBACCO BY BABA
AZOXYSTROBINE MIXTURE
AND THEIR MIXTURES, FUNGAL ISOLATE = R
		Percent Disease Control
	Ratio	mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	(w/w)	5	10	25	50	100	200	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	—	—	0	13	100	171
AZOXY-	13	81	81	81	93	—	—	27
STROBINE
BABA +
AZOXY-
STROBINE
5 + 1				25	100	100	100	41	2.2
10 + 1				38	81	100	100	54	2.1
15 + 1				50	81	100	100	53	2.4

[0083]

TABLE 29
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN TOBACCO BY BABA,
ACIBENZOLAR-S-METHYL, RIDOMIL-GOLD
AND THEIR MIXTURES: Fungal isolate = R
		Percent Disease
		Control mg/L
		Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio (w/w)	16	62	250	mg/L	CF
BABA	—	3	27	51	406
BION	—	76	76	99	88
RIDOMILGOLD	—	49	37	58	416
BABA +	75 + 1	48	78	99	90	3.1
ACIBENZOLAR-S-	10 + 1	45	93	100	52	5.9
METHYL	15 + 1	22	84	91	186	1.8
	20 + 1	14	74	98	116	3.5
BABA + RIDOMIL GOLD	7.5 + 1	27	63	97	150	2.7
	10 + 1	34	44	99	145	2.8
	15 + 1	23	52	78	282	1.4
	20 + 1	0	20	91	239	1.4
BABA +	7.5 + 1 + 1	37	63	95	174	1.7
ACIBENZOLAR-S-	10 + 1 + 1	45	71	92	190	1.7
METHYL +	15 + 1 + 1	37	84	82	230	1.5
RIDOMIL-GOLD	20 + 1 + 1	57	98	98	84	4.2

[0084]

TABLE 30
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN TOBACCO BY BABA,
ACIBENZOLAR-S-METHYL, CURZATE RIDOMIL-GOLD
AND THEIR MIXTURES: Fungal isolate = R
		Percent Disease
		Control mg/L
		Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio (w/w)	100	200	400	mg/L	CF
BABA	—	37	62	100	270	—
ACIBENZOLAR-	—	37	50	80	443	—
S-METHYL
CURZATE	—	25	25	62	596	—
RIDOMILGOLD		20	35	42	>1000	—
BABA +	10 + 1	62	100	100	113	2.5
ACIBENZOLAR-	15 + 1	50	100	100	118	2.3
S-METHYL
BABA + CURZATE	10 + 1	62	100	100	113	2.5
	5 + 1	37	62	100	270	1.1

[0085]

TABLE 31
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN TOBACCO BY BABA,
ACIBENZOLAR-S-METHYL, RIDOMIL-GOLD
AND THEIR MIXTURES: Fungal isolate = S
		Percent Disease
		Control mg/L
		Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio (w/w)	0.5	5	50	mg/L	CF
BABA	—	0	27	59	78	—
ACIBENZOLAR-	—	54	76	85	52	—
S-METHYL
RIDOMILGOLD		100	100	100	0.2	—
BABA +	7.5 + 1	85	85	99	15	4.9
ACIBENZOLAR-S-	10 + 1	86	94	100	4	18.7
METHYL	15 + 1	75	84	100	5	15.1
BABA +	7.5 + 1	94	100	100	0.5	3.3
RIDOMIL-GOLD	10 + 1	99	100	100	0.4	5.4
	15 + 1	88	90	100	4.3	2.1
BABA +	7.5 + 1 + 1	99	100	100	0.4	4.4
ACIBENZOLAR-S-	10 + 1 + 1	100	100	100	0.2	12.2
METHYL +	15 + 1 + 1	73	100	100	0.6	5.3
RIDOMIL-GOLD

[0086]

TABLE 32
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN GRAPES BY BABA
ACIBENZOLAR-S-METHYL AND THEIR MIXTURES IN LEAF DISCS
	Percent Disease Control
	mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio (w/w)	0.31	1.25	5	20	50	100	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	—	15	93	95	99	38	—
ACIBENZOLA	0	27	75	100	—	—	6	—
R-S-METHYL
BABA +	10 + 1	0	37	68	100	—	—	6.6	3.9
ACIBENZOLA
R-S-METHYL
	15 + 1	60	82	100	100	—	—	1.4	19.8

[0087]

TABLE 33
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN GRAPES BY BABA, ALLIETTE
AND THEIR MIXTURES IN LEAF DISCS
	Percent Disease Control
	mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio (w/w)	1.25	2.5	5	10	20	50	mg/L	CF
BABA		—	38	44	81	86	92	33	—
ALLIETTE	13	36	38	40	48	81	—	24
BABA + ALLIETTE	1 + 1	44	81	87	89	92	—	12	2.3
	3 + 1	44	69	88	92	95	—	10	3.0
	5 + 1	25	31	43	47	83	—	22	1.4
	7 + 1	24	31	34	56	62	—	30	1.0
	9 + 1	22	34	39	55	61	—	31	1.0

[0088]

TABLE 34
CONTROL OF DOWNY MILDEW IN GRAPES BY BABA, CURZATE
AND THEIR MIXTURES, IN LEAF DISCS
	Percent Disease Control
	mg/L Active Ingredient	ED90
Compounds	Ratio (w/w)	1.25	2.5	5	10	20	50	mg/L	CF
BABA	—	—	25	36	78	83	91	36	—
CURZATE		11	39	58	66	55	—	27	—
BABA + CURZATE	1 + 1	51	61	68	81	89	—	16	1.9
	3 + 1	62	70	77	86	93	—	13	2.6
	5 + 1	69	74	81	89	95	—	11	3.1
	7 + 1	49	68	74	78	89	—	16	2.2
	9 + 1	21	39	58	73	82	—	17	2.1

Claims

1. A synergistic fungicidal composition comprising synergistically effective respective amounts of (1) D,L-3-aminobutyric acid or the n-octyl ester thereof, together with (2) copper or a copper salt.

2. The fungicidal composition of claim 1, wherein said copper salt is copper sulfate, copper hydrate or copper sulfate hydrate.

3. The fungicidal composition of claim 1 wherein the (1) D,L-3-aminobutyric acid or n-octyl ester thereof and (2) copper or a copper salt are present in a weight ratio of 9:1 to 1:9.

4. The fungicidal composition of claim 3 wherein said weight ratio is 4:1 to 1:4.

5. The fungical composition of claim 1 wherein fungicidal components consist essentially of said (1) D,L-3-aminobutyric acid or n-octyl ester thereof and (2) said copper or a copper salt.

6. A method of administering a fungicidal composition in accordance with claim 1 to a plant infested with a fungus, wherein the fungus is selected from the group consisting of Phytophthora infestans, Pseudopersonspora Cubensis, Plasmopara veticola, and Peronospora tabacina.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the fungus is selected from the group consisting of Phytophthora infestans in potatoes and tomatoes, Pseudoperonspora Cubensis in cucumber and melons, Plasmopara veticola in grapes, and Peronospora tabacina in tobacco.

8. A method of controlling fungal infections in plants comprising applying to the plants or parts thereof a synergistic fungicidal composition comprising synergistically effective respective amounts of (1) D,L-3-aminobutyric acid or the n-octyl ester thereof, and (2) copper or a copper salt.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein said copper salt is copper sulfate, copper hydrate or copper sulfate hydrate.

10. The method of claim 8 which comprises applying said (1) D,L-3-aminobutyric acid or n-octyl ester thereof and (2) said copper or a copper salt in a weight ratio of 9:1 to 1:9.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein said weight ratio is 4:1 to 1:4.

12. The method of claim 8 wherein the plants are selected from the group consisting of potatoes, tomatoes, cucumbers, melons, grape vines and tobacco.

13. A method according to claim 8 wherein the fungus is selected from the group consisting of Phytophthora infestans, Pseudopersonspora Cubensis, Plasmopara veticola, and Peronospora tabacina.

14. A method in accordance with claim 12 wherein the fungus is selected from the group consisting of Phytophthora infestans in potatoes and tomatoes, Pseudopersonspora Cubensis in cucumber and melons, Plasmopara veticola in grapes, and Peronospora tabacina in tobacco.