Synthetic diesel fuel and process for its production (law3 1 1)

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6607568
  • Patent Number
    6,607,568
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 26, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 19, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
Diesel fuels or blending stocks having excellent lubricity, oxidative stability and high cetane number are produced from non-shifting Fischer-Tropsch processes by separating the Fischer-Tropsch product into a lighter and heavier fractions, e.g., at about 700° F., subjecting the 700° F.+ fraction to hydro-treating, and combining the 700° F.− portion of the hydrotreated product with the lighter fraction that has not been hydrotreated.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to a distillate material having a high cetane number and useful as a diesel fuel or as a blending stock therefor, as well as the process for preparing the distillate. More particularly, this invention relates to a process for preparing distillate from a Fischer-Tropsch wax.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Clean distillates that contain no or nil sulfur, nitrogen, or aromatics, are, or will likely be in great demand as diesel fuel or in blending diesel fuel. Clean distillates having relatively high cetane number are particularly valuable. Typical petroleum derived distillates are not clean, in that they typically contain significant amounts of sulfur, nitrogen, and aromatics, and they have relatively low cetane numbers. Clean distillates can be produced from petroleum based distillates through severe hydrotreating at great expense. Such severe hydrotreating imparts relatively little improvement in cetane number and also adversely impacts the fuel's lubricity. Fuel lubricity, required for the efficient operation of fuel delivery system, can be improved by the use of costly additive packages. The production of clean, high cetane number distillates from Fischer-Tropsch waxes has been discussed in the open literature, but the processes disclosed for preparing such distillates also leave the distillate lacking in one or more important properties, e.g., lubricity. The Fischer-Tropsch distillates disclosed, therefore, require blending with other less desirable stocks or the use of costly additives. These earlier schemes disclose hydrotreating the total Fischer-Tropsch product, including the entire 700° F.− fraction. This hydro-treating results in the elimination of oxygenates from the distillate.




By virtue of this present invention small amounts of oxygenates are retained, the resulting product having both very high cetane number and high lubricity. This product is therefore useful as a diesel fuel as such, or as a blending stock for preparing diesel fuels from other lower grade material.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with this invention, a clean distillate useful as a fuel heavier than gasoline, e.g., useful as a diesel fuel or as a diesel fuel blend stock and having a cetane number of at least about 60, preferably at least about 70, more preferably at least about 74, is produced, preferably from a Fischer-Tropsch wax and preferably derived from a cobalt or ruthenium Fischer-Tropsch catalyst, by separating the waxy product into a heavier fraction and a lighter fraction. The nominal separation is at about 700° F., and the heavier fraction contains primarily 700° F.+, and the lighter fraction contains primarily 700° F.−.




The heavier fraction is subjected to hydroisomerization in the presence of a hydroisomerization catalyst, having one or more noble or non-noble metals, at normal hydroisomerization conditions, where at least a portion of the 700° F.+ material is converted to 700° F.− material. At least a portion and preferably all of the lighter fraction, preferably after separation of C


5


− (although some C


3


and C


4


may be dissolved in the C


5


+) remains untreated, i.e., other than by physical separation, and is blended back with at least a portion and preferably all of the hydroisomerized, 700° F.−, product. From this combined product a diesel fuel or diesel blending stock in the boiling range 250° F.-700° F. can be recovered and has the properties described below.











DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic of a process in accordance with this invention.





FIG. 2

shows IR absorbence spectra for two fuels: I for Diesel Fuel B, and II for Diesel Fuel B with 0.0005 mmoles/gm palnitic acid (which corresponds to 15 wppm oxygen as oxygen); absorbance on the ordinate, wave length on the abscissa.











DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A more detailed description of this invention may be had by referring to the drawing. Synthesis gas, hydrogen and carbon monoxide, in an appropriate ratio, contained in line


1


is fed to a Fischer-Tropsch reactor


2


, preferably a slurry reactor and product is recovered in lines


3


and


4


, 700° F.+ and 700° F.− respectively. The lighter fraction goes through hot separator


6


and a 500-700° F. fraction is recovered, in line


8


, while a 500° F.− fraction is recovered in line


7


. The 500° F.− material goes through cold separator


9


from which C


4


-gases are recovered in line


10


. A C


5-500


° F. fraction is recovered in line


11


and is combined with the 500-700° F. fraction in line


8


. At least a portion and preferably most, more preferably essentially all of this C


5


-700 fraction is blended with the hydroisomerized product in line


12


.




The heavier, e.g., 700° F.+ fraction, in line


3


is sent to hydro-isomerization unit


5


. Typical broad and preferred conditions for the hydro-isomerization process unit are shown in the table below:

















Condition




Broad Range




Preferred Range











Temperature, ° F.




300-800 




550-750






Total Pressure, psig




 0-2500




 300-1200






Hydrogen Treat Rate, SCF/B




500-5000




2000-4000






Hydrogen Consumption Rate, SCF/B




50-500




100-300














While virtually any catalyst useful in hydroisomerization or selective hydrocracking may be satisfactory for this step, some catalysts perform better than others and are preferred. For example, catalysts containing a supported Group VIII noble metal, e.g., platinum or palladium, are useful as are catalysts containing one or more Group VIII base metals, e.g., nickel, cobalt, in amounts of about 0.5-20 wt %, which may or may not also include a Group VI metal, e.g., molybdenum, in amounts of about 1-20 wt %. The support for the metals can be any refractory oxide or zeolite or mixtures thereof. Preferred supports include silica, alumina, silica-alumina, silica-alumina phosphates, titania, zirconia, vanadia and other Group III, IV, VA or VI oxides, as well as Y sieves, such as ultrastable Y sieves. Preferred supports include alumina and silica-alumina where the silica concentration of the bulk support is less than about 50 wt %. preferably less than about 35 wt %.




A preferred catalyst has a surface area in the range of about 180-400 m


2


/gm, preferably 230-350 m


2


/gm, and a pore volume of 0.3 to 1.0 ml/gm, preferably 0.35 to 0.75 ml/gm, a bulk density of about 0.5-1.0 g/ml, and a side crushing strength of about 0.8 to 3.5 kg/mm.




The preferred catalysts comprise a non-noble Group VIII metal, e.g., iron, nickel, in conjunction with a Group IB metal, e.g., copper, supported on an acidic support. The support is preferably an amorphous silica-alumina where the alumina is present in amounts of less than about 30 wt %, preferably 5-30 wt %, more preferably 10-20 wt %. Also, the support may contain small amounts, e.g., 20-30 wt %, of a binder, e.g., alumina, silica, Group IVA metal oxides, and various types of clays, magnesia, etc., preferably alumina. The catalyst is prepared by coimpregnating the metals from solutions onto the support, drying at 100-150° C., and calcining in air at 200-550° C.




The preparation of amorphous silica-alumina microspheres for supports is described in Ryland, Lloyd B., Tamele, M. W., and Wilson, J. N., Cracking Catalysts, Catalysis: volume VII, Ed. Paul H. Emmett, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 1960, pp. 5-9.




The Group VIII metal is present in amounts of about 15 wt % or less, preferably 1-12 wt %, while the Group IB metal is usually present in lesser amounts, e.g., 1:2 to about 1:20 ratio respecting the Group VIII metal. A typical catalyst is shown below:





















Ni, wt %




2.5-3.5







Cu, wt %




0.25-0.35







Al


2


O


3


—S


i


O


2






65-75







Al


2


O


3


(binder)




25-30







Surface Area




290-355 m


2


/gm







Pour Volume (Hg)




0.35-0.45 ml/gm







Bulk Density




0.58-0.68 g/ml















The 700° F.+ conversion to 700° F.− in the hydroisomerization unit ranges from about 20-80%, preferably 20-50%, more preferably about 30-50%. During hydroisomerization essentially all olefins and oxygen containing materials are hydrogenated.




The hydroisomerization product is recovered in line


12


into which the C


5-700


° F. stream of lines


8


and


11


are blended. The blended stream is fractionated in tower


13


, from which 700° F.+ is, optionally, recycled in line


14


back to line


3


, C


5


− is recovered in line


16


and a clean distillate boiling in the range of 250-700° F. is recovered in line


15


. This distillate has unique properties and may be used as a diesel fuel or as a blending component for diesel fuel. Light gases may be recovered in line


16


and combined in line


17


with the light gases from the cold separator


9


and used for fuel or chemicals processing.




The diesel material recovered from the fractionator


13


, has the properties shown below:


















paraffins




at least 95 wt %, preferably at least 96 wt %, more







preferably at least 97 wt %, still more preferably at







least 98 wt %, and most preferably at least 99 wt %;






iso/normal ratio




about 0.3 to 3.0, preferably 0.7-2.0;






sulfur




≦50 ppm (wt), preferably nil;






nitrogen




≦50 ppm (wt), preferably ≦20 ppm, more







preferably nil;






unsaturates




≦2 wt %;






(olefins and aromatics)






oxygenates




about 0.001 to less than 0.3 wt % oxygen water-free







basis.














The iso paraffins are preferably mono methyl branched, and since the process utilizes Fischer-Tropsch wax, the product contains nil cyclic paraffins, e.g., no cyclohexane.




The oxygenates are contained essentially, e.g., ≧95% of the oxygenates, in the lighter fraction, e.g., the 700° F.− fraction. Further, the olefin concentration of the lighter fraction is sufficiently low as to make olefin recovery unnecessary; and further treatment of the fraction for olefins is avoided.




The preferred Fischer-Tropsch process is one that utilizes a non-shifting (that is, no water gas shift capability) catalyst, such as cobalt or ruthenium or mixtures thereof, preferably cobalt, and preferably a promoted cobalt, the promoter being zirconium or rhenium, preferably rhenium. Such catalysts are well known and a preferred catalyst is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,568,663 as well as European Patent 0 266 898. The hydrogen:CO ratio in the process is at least about 1.7, preferably at least about 1.75, more preferably 1.75 to 2.5.




The products of the Fischer-Tropsch process are primarily paraffinic hydrocarbons. Ruthenium produces paraffins primarily boiling in the distillate range, i.e., C


10


-C


20


; while cobalt catalysts generally produce more of heavier hydrocarbons, e.g., C


20


+, and cobalt is a preferred Fischer-Tropsch catalytic metal.




Diesel fuels generally have the properties of high cetane number, usually 50 or higher, preferably at least about 60, more preferably at least about 65, lubricity, oxidative stability, and physical properties compatible with diesel pipeline specifications.




The product of this invention may be used as a diesel fuel, per se, or blended with other less desirable petroleum or hydrocarbon containing feeds of about the same boiling range. When used as a blend, the product of this invention can be used in relatively minor amounts, e.g., 10% or more, for significantly improving the final blended diesel product. Although, the product of this invention will improve almost any diesel product, it is especially desirable to blend this product with refinery diesel streams of low quality. Typical streams are raw or hydrogenated catalytic or thermally cracked distillates and gas oils.




By virtue of using the Fischer-Tropsch process, the recovered distillate has nil sulfur and nitrogen. These hereto-atom compounds are poisons for Fischer-Tropsch catalysts and are removed from the methane containing natural gas that is a convenient feed for the Fischer-Tropsch process. (Sulfur and nitrogen containing compounds are, in any event, in exceedingly low concentrations in natural gas.) Further, the process does not make aromatics, or as usually operated, virtually no aromatics are produced. Some olefins are produced since one of the proposed pathways for the production of paraffins is through an olefinic intermediate. Nevertheless, olefin concentration is usually quite low.




Oxygenated compounds including alcohols and some acids are produced during Fischer-Tropsch processing, but in at least one well known process, oxygenates and unsaturates are completely eliminated from the product by hydrotreating. See, for example, The Shell Middle Distillate Process, Eiler, J.; Posthuma, S. A.; Sie, S. T., Catalysis Letters, 1990, 7, 253-270.




We have found, however, that small amounts of oxygenates, preferably alcohols, usually concentrated in the 700° F.− fraction and preferably in the 500-700° F. fraction, more preferably in the 600-700° F. fraction, provide exceptional lubricity for diesel fuels. For example, as illustrations will show, a highly paraffinic diesel fuel with small amounts of oxygenates has excellent lubricity as shown by the BOCLE test (ball on cylinder lubricity evaluator). However, when the oxygenates were removed, for example, by extraction, absorbtion over molecular sieves, hydroprocessing, etc., to a level of less than 10 ppm wt % oxygen (water free basis) in the fraction being tested, the lubricity was quite poor.




By virtue of the processing scheme disclosed in this invention the lighter, 700° F.− fraction is not subjected to any hydrotreating. In the absence of hydrotreating of the lighter fraction, the small amount of oxygenates, primarily linear alcohols, in this fraction are preserved, while oxygenates in the heavier fraction are eliminated during the hydroisomerization step. Hydroisomerization also serves to increase the amount of iso paraffins in the distillate fuel and helps the fuel to meet pour point and cloud point specifications, although additives may be employed for these purposes.




The oxygen compounds that are believed to promote lubricity may be described as having a hydrogen bonding energy greater than the bonding energy of hydrocarbons (the energy measurements for various compounds are available in standard references); the greater the difference, the greater the lubricity effect. The oxygen compounds also have a lipophilic end and a hydrophilic end to allow wetting of the fuel.




Preferred oxygen compounds, primarily alcohols, have a relatively long chain, i.e., C


12


+, more preferably C


12


-C


24


primary linear alcohols.




While acids are oxygen containing compounds, acids are corrosive and are produced in quite small amounts during Fischer-Tropsch processing at non-shift conditions. Acids are also di-oxygenates as opposed to the preferred mono-oxygenates illustrated by the linear alcohols. Thus, di or poly-oxygenates are usually undetectable by infra red measurements and are, e.g., less than about 15 wppm oxygen as oxygen.




Non-shifting Fischer-Tropsch reactions are well known to those skilled in the art and may be characterized by conditions that minimize the formations of CO


2


byproducts. These conditions can be achieved by a variety of methods, including one or more of the following: operating at relatively low CO partial pressures, that is, operating at hydrogen to CO ratios of at least about 1.7/1, preferably about 1.7/1 to about 2.5/1, more preferably at least about 1.9/1, and in the range 1.9/1 to about 2.3/1, all with an alpha of at least about 0.88, preferably at least about 0.91; temperatures of about 175-225° C., preferably 180-210° C.; using catalysts comprising cobalt or ruthenium as the primary Fischer-Tropsch catalysis agent.




The amount of oxygenates present, as oxygen on a water free basis is relatively small to achieve the desired lubricity, i.e., at least about 0.001 wt % oxygen (water free basis), preferably 0.001-0.3 wt % oxygen (water free basis), more preferably 0.0025-0.3 wt % oxygen (water free basis).




The following examples will serve to illustrate, but not limit, this invention.




Hydrogen and carbon monoxide synthesis gas (H


2


:CO 2.11-2.16) were converted to heavy paraffins in a slurry Fischer-Tropsch reactor. The catalyst utilized for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction was a titania supported cobalt/rhenium catalyst previously described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,568,663. The reaction conditions were 422-428° F., 287-289 psig, and a linear velocity of 12 to 17.5 cm/sec. The alpha of the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis step was 0.92. The paraffinic Fischer-Tropsch product was then isolated in three nominally different boiling streams, separated utilizing a rough flash. The three approximate boiling fractions were: 1) the C


5


-500° F. boiling fraction, designated below as F-T Cold Separator Liquids; 2) The 500-700° F. boiling fraction designated below as F-T Hot Separator Liquids; and 3) the 700° F.+ boiling fraction designated below as F-T Reactor Wax.




EXAMPLE 1




Seventy wt % of a Hydroisomerized F-T Reactor Wax, 16.8 wt % Hydrotreated F-T Cold Separator Liquids and 13.2 wt % Hydrotreated F-T Hot Separator Liquids were combined and rigorously mixed. Diesel Fuel A was the 260-700° F. boiling fraction of this blend, as isolated by distillation, and was prepared as follows: The hydroisomerized F-T Reactor Wax was prepared in flow through, fixed bed unit using a cobalt and molybdenum promoted amorphous silica-alumina catalyst, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,292,989 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,348. Hydroisomerization conditions were 708° F., 750 psig H


2


, 2500 SCF/B H


2


, and a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.7-0.8. Hydroisomerization was conducted with recycle of unreacted 700° F.+ reactor wax. The Combined Feed Ratio, (Fresh Feed+Recycle Feed)/Fresh Feed equaled 1.5. Hydrotreated F-T Cold and Hot Separator Liquid were prepared using a flow through fixed bed reactor and commercial massive nickel catalyst. Hydrotreating conditions were 450° F., 430 psig H


2


, 1000 SCF/B H


2


, and 3.0 LHSV. Fuel A is representative of a typical completely hydrotreated cobalt derived Fischer-Tropsch diesel fuel, well known in the art.




EXAMPLE 2




Seventy Eight wt % of a Hydroisomerized F-T Reactor Wax, 12 wt % Unhydrotreated F-T Cold Separator Liquids, and 10 wt % F-T Hot Separator Liquids were combined and mixed. Diesel Fuel B was the 250-700° F. boiling fraction of this blend, as isolated by distillation, and was prepared as follows: The Hydroisomerized F-T Reactor Wax was prepared in flow through, fixed bed unit using a cobalt and molybdenum promoted amorphous silica-alumina catalyst, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,292,989 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,348. Hydroisomerization conditions were 690° F., 725 psig H


2


, 2500 SCF/B H


2


, and a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.6-0.7. Fuel B is a representative example of this invention.




EXAMPLE 3




Diesel Fuels C and D were prepared by distilling Fuel B into two fractions. Diesel Fuel C represents the 250 to 500° F. fraction of Diesel Fuel B. Diesel Fuel D represents the 500-700° F. fraction of Diesel Fuel B.




EXAMPLE 4




100.81 grams of Diesel Fuel B was contacted with 33.11 grams of Grace Silico-aluminate zeolite: 13X, Grade 544, 8-12 mesh beads. Diesel Fuel E is the filtrated liquid resulting from this treatment. This treatment effectively removes alcohols and other oxygenates from the fuel.




EXAMPLE 5




Diesel Fuel F is a hydrotreated petroleum stream composed of approximately 40% cat distillate and 60% virgin distillate. It was subsequently hydrotreated in a commercial hydrotreater. The petroleum fraction has a boiling range of 250-800° F., contains 663 ppm sulfur (x-ray), and 40% FIA aromatics. Diesel Fuel F represents a petroleum base case for this invention.




EXAMPLE 6




Diesel Fuel G was prepared by combining equal amounts of Diesel Fuel B with a Diesel Fuel F. Diesel Fuel G should contain 600 ppm total oxygen (neutron activation), 80 ppm 500+° F. boiling primary alcohols the (GC/MS), and signal for primary alcohols indicates 320 ppm total oxygen as primary alcohols (


1


H NMR; 250-700° F.). Diesel Fuel G represents an additional example for this invention where both HCS and petroleum distillates are used to comprise the diesel fuel.




EXAMPLE 7




Oxygenate, dioxygenate, and alcohol composition of Diesel Fuels A, B, and E were measured using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (


1


H-NMR), Infrared Spectroscopy (IR), and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS).


1


H-NMR experiments were done using a Brucker MSL-500 Spectrometer. Quantitative data were obtained by measuring the samples, dissolved in CDCl


3


, at ambient temperature, using a frequency of 500.13 MHz, pulse width of 2.9 us (45 degree tip angle), delay of 60 s, and 64 scans. Tetramethylsilane was used as an internal reference in each case and dioxane was used as an internal standard. Levels of primary alcohols, secondary alcohols, esters and acids were estimated directly by comparing integrals for peaks at 3.6 (2H), 3.4 (1H), 4.1 (2H) and 2.4 (2H) ppm respectively, with that of the internal standard. IR Spectroscopy was done using a Nicolet 800 spectro-meter. Samples were prepared by placing them in a KBr fixed path length cell (nominally 1.0 mm) and acquisition was done by adding 4096 scans a 0.3 cm


−1


resolution. Levels of dioxygenates, such as carboxylic acids and esters, were measured using the absorbance at 1720 and 1738 cm


−1


, respectively. GC/MS were performed using either a Hewlett-Packard 5980/Hewlett-Packard 5970B Mass Selective Detector Combination (MSD) or Kratos Model MS-890 GC/MS. Selected ion monitoring of m/z 31 (CH


3


O


+


) was used to quantify the primary alcohols. An external standard was made by weighing C


2


-C


14


, C


16


and C


18


primary alcohols into a mixture of C


8


-C


16


normal paraffins. Olefins were determined using Bromine Index, as described in ASTM D 2710. Results from these analyses are presented in Table 1. Diesel Fuel B which contains the unhydrotreated hot and cold separator liquids contains a significant amount of oxygenates as linear, primary alcohols. A significant fraction of these are the important C


12


-C


18


primary alcohols. It is these alcohols that impart superior performance in diesel lubricity. Hydrotreating (Diesel Fuel A) is extremely effective at removing essentially all of the oxygenates and olefins. Mole sieve treatment (Diesel Fuel E) also is effective at removing the alcohol contaminants without the use of process hydrogen. None of these fuels contain significant levels of dioxygenates, such as carboxylic acids or esters. A sample IR spectrum for Diesel Fuel B is shown in FIG.


2


.












TABLE 1











Oxygenate, and dioxygenate (carboxylic acids, esters) composition






of All Hydrotreated Diesel Fuel (Diesel Fuel A), Partially






Hydrotreated Diesel Fuel (Diesel Fuel B), and the Mole Sieve






Treated, Partially Hydrotreated Diesel Fuel (Diesel Fuel E).















Diesel




Diesel




Diesel







Fuel A




Fuel B




Fuel B


















wppm Oxygen in dioxygenates,




None




None




None






(carboxylic acids, esters) - (IR)




Detected




Detected




Detected






wppm Oxygen in C


5


-C


18






None




640 ppm




None






primary alcohols - (


1


H NMR)




Detected





Detected






wppm Oxygen in C


5


-C


18






5.3




824




None






primary alcohols - (GC/MS)






Detected






wppm Oxygen in C


12


-C


18






3.3




195 ppm




None






primary alcohols - (GC/MS)






Detected






Total Olefins - mmol/g (Bromine




 0.004




0.78











Index, ASTM D 2710)














EXAMPLE 8




Diesel Fuels A—G were all tested using a standard Ball on Cylinder Lubricity Evaluation (BOCLE), further described as Lacey, P. I. “The U.S. Army Scuffing Load Wear Test”, Jan. 1, 1994. This test is based on ASTM D 5001. Results are reported in Table 2 as percents of Reference Fuel 2, described in Lacey.












TABLE 2











BOCLE results for Fuels A-G. Results






reported as percents of Reference Fuel 2 as described in














Diesel Fuel




% Reference Fuel 2











A




42.1







B




88.9







C




44.7







D




94.7







E




30.6







F




80.0







G




84.4















The completely hydrotreated Diesel Fuel A, exhibits very low lubricity typical of an all paraffin diesel fuel. Diesel Fuel B, which contains a high level of oxygenates as linear, C


5


-C


24


primary alcohols, exhibits significantly superior lubricity properties. Diesel Fuel E was prepared by separating the oxygenates away from Diesel Fuel B through adsorption by 13X molecular sieves. Diesel Fuel E exhibits very poor lubricity indicating the linear C


5


-C


24


primary alcohols are responsible for the high lubricity of Diesel Fuel B. Diesel Fuels C and D represent the 250-500° F. and the 500-700° F. boiling fractions of Diesel Fuel B, respectively. Diesel Fuel C contains the linear C


5


-C


11


primary alcohols that boil below 500° F., and Diesel Fuel D contains the C


12


-C


24


primary alcohols that boil between 500-700° F. Diesel Fuel D exhibits superior lubricity properties compared to Diesel Fuel C, and is in fact superior in performance to Diesel Fuel B from which it is derived. This clearly indicates that the C


12


-C


24


primary alcohols that boil between 500-700° F. are important to producing a high lubricity saturated diesel fuel. Diesel Fuel F is representative of petroleum derived low sulfur diesel fuel, and although it exhibits reasonably high lubricity properties it is not as high as the highly paraffinic Diesel Fuel B. Diesel Fuel G is the 1:1 blend of Diesel Fuel B and Diesel Fuel F and it exhibits improved lubricity performance compared to Diesel F. This indicates that the highly paraffinic Diesel Fuel B is not only a superior neat fuel composition, but also an outstanding diesel blending component capable of improving the properties of petroleum derived low sulfur diesel fuels.



Claims
  • 1. A process for producing a distillate fuel heavier than gasoline comprising:(a) separating the product of a Fischer-Tropsch process into a heavier fraction and a lighter fraction; (b) hydroisomerizing the heavier fraction at hydroisomerization conditions and recovering a 700° F.− fraction therefrom; and (c) blending at least a portion of the recovered fraction of step (b) with at least a portion of the lighter fraction.
  • 2. The process of claim 1 wherein a product boiling in the range 250-700° F. is recovered from the blended product of step (c).
  • 3. The process of claim 2 wherein the recovered product of step (c) contains 0.001-0.3 wt % oxygen, water free basis.
  • 4. The product of claim 3.
  • 5. The process of claim 2 wherein the lighter fraction is characterized by the absence of hydrotreating.
  • 6. The process of claim 2 wherein the lighter fraction contains C12+ primary alcohols.
  • 7. The process of claim 6 wherein the lighter fraction contains essentially all of the C12-C24 primary alcohols.
  • 8. The process of claim 2 wherein the Fischer-Tropsch process is characterized by non-shifting conditions.
Parent Case Info

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 09/464,179, filed Dec. 16, 1999, and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,274,029; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/544,343, filed Oct. 17, 1995, and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,296,757.

US Referenced Citations (211)
Number Name Date Kind
2243760 Martin May 1941 A
2562980 Atwell Aug 1951 A
2668790 Good et al Feb 1954 A
2668866 Good et al Feb 1954 A
2756183 Knox Jr. Jul 1956 A
2779713 Cole et al Jan 1957 A
2817693 Koome et al Dec 1957 A
2838444 Teter et al Jun 1958 A
2888501 Folkins et al May 1959 A
2892003 Weisz Jun 1959 A
2906688 Farmer et al Sep 1959 A
2914464 Burton et al Nov 1959 A
2982802 Folkins et al May 1961 A
2993938 Bloch et al Jul 1961 A
3002827 Fenske Oct 1961 A
3052622 Johnson et al Sep 1962 A
3078323 Kline et al Feb 1963 A
3121696 Hoekstra Feb 1964 A
3123573 Carr Mar 1964 A
3125511 Tupman et al Mar 1964 A
3147210 Hass et al Sep 1964 A
3188286 Van Driesen Jun 1965 A
3206525 Michaels et al Sep 1965 A
3253055 Goble et al May 1966 A
3268436 Arey Jr., et al. Aug 1966 A
3268439 Tupman et al Aug 1966 A
3308052 Ireland et al Mar 1967 A
3338843 Goble et al Aug 1967 A
3340180 Beuther et al Sep 1967 A
3365390 Egan et al Jan 1968 A
3395981 Kischio Aug 1968 A
3404086 Plank et al Oct 1968 A
3471399 O'Hara Oct 1969 A
3486993 Egan et al Dec 1969 A
3487005 Egan et al Dec 1969 A
3507776 Hann Apr 1970 A
3530061 Orkin et al Sep 1970 A
3594307 Kirk Jr. Jul 1971 A
3607729 Robinson et al Sep 1971 A
3619408 Larson Nov 1971 A
3620960 Kozlowski et al Nov 1971 A
3629096 Kivijak Jr. Dec 1971 A
3630885 Egan Dec 1971 A
3658689 Steinmetz et al Apr 1972 A
3660058 Feldman et al May 1972 A
3668112 Parker Jun 1972 A
3668113 Birbidge Jun 1972 A
3674681 Lyon Jul 1972 A
3681232 Egan Aug 1972 A
3684695 Neel et al Aug 1972 A
3692695 Suggitt et al Sep 1972 A
3692697 Kravitz et al Sep 1972 A
3711399 Estes et al Jan 1973 A
3717586 Suggitt et al Feb 1973 A
3725302 Shimely Apr 1973 A
3709817 Suggitt et al Jun 1973 A
3761388 Bryson et al Sep 1973 A
3767562 Sze et al Oct 1973 A
3770618 Adams Nov 1973 A
3775291 Sze Nov 1973 A
3794580 Ladeur Feb 1974 A
3814682 Christman et al Jun 1974 A
3830723 Ladeur et al Aug 1974 A
3830728 Mounce Aug 1974 A
3840508 Ballard et al Oct 1974 A
3840614 Kravitz et al Oct 1974 A
3843509 Suto et al Oct 1974 A
3843746 Kravitz et al. Oct 1974 A
3848018 Robson Nov 1974 A
3852186 Christman et al Dec 1974 A
3852207 Stangeland et al Dec 1974 A
3861005 Steinmetz et al Jan 1975 A
3864425 Gardner Feb 1975 A
3870622 Ashton et al Mar 1975 A
3876522 Campbell et al. Apr 1975 A
3887455 Hamner Jun 1975 A
3915843 Franck et al Oct 1975 A
3963601 Hilfman Jun 1976 A
3976560 Erickson et al. Aug 1976 A
3977961 Hamner Aug 1976 A
3977962 Arey, Jr. et al. Aug 1976 A
3979279 Yan Sep 1976 A
4014821 Hamner Mar 1977 A
4032304 Dorer, Jr. et al. Jun 1977 A
4032474 Goudriaan et al. Jun 1977 A
4041095 Kuo Aug 1977 A
4051021 Hamner Sep 1977 A
4059648 Derr et al. Nov 1977 A
4067797 Chen et al. Jan 1978 A
4073718 Hamner Feb 1978 A
4079025 Young et al. Mar 1978 A
4087349 Baird, Jr. May 1978 A
4125566 Dinh Nov 1978 A
4139494 Itoh et al. Feb 1979 A
4162962 Stangeland Jul 1979 A
4186078 Itoh et al. Jan 1980 A
4212771 Hamner Jul 1980 A
4263127 Rausch et al. Apr 1981 A
4304871 Brennan et al. Dec 1981 A
4342641 Reif et al. Aug 1982 A
4378973 Sweeney Apr 1983 A
4390414 Cody Jun 1983 A
4392940 Tao Jul 1983 A
4394251 Miller Jul 1983 A
4427534 Brunn et al. Jan 1984 A
4427790 Miale et al. Jan 1984 A
4428819 Shu et al. Jan 1984 A
4444895 Fung et al. Apr 1984 A
4451572 Cody May 1984 A
4472529 Johnson et al. Sep 1984 A
4477586 McDaniel Oct 1984 A
4487688 Dessau Dec 1984 A
4518395 Petronella May 1985 A
4527995 Itow et al. Jul 1985 A
4529526 Inoue et al. Jul 1985 A
4539014 Sweeney Sep 1985 A
4568663 Mauldin Feb 1986 A
4579986 Sie Apr 1986 A
4588701 Chiang et al. May 1986 A
4594172 Sie Jun 1986 A
4599162 Yen Jul 1986 A
4608151 Miller Aug 1986 A
4618412 Hudson et al. Oct 1986 A
4627908 Miller Dec 1986 A
4645585 White Feb 1987 A
4673487 Miller Jun 1987 A
4684756 Derr, Jr. et al. Aug 1987 A
4695365 Ackelson et al. Sep 1987 A
4749467 Chen et al. Jun 1988 A
4755280 Hudson et al. Jul 1988 A
4764266 Chen et al. Aug 1988 A
4804802 Evans Feb 1989 A
4832819 Hamner May 1989 A
4851109 Chen et al. Jul 1989 A
4855530 LaPierre et al. Aug 1989 A
4863887 Ohtake et al. Sep 1989 A
4875992 Hamner Oct 1989 A
4900707 Cody et al. Feb 1990 A
4906599 Cody et al. Mar 1990 A
4910227 Brown et al. Mar 1990 A
4911821 Katzer et al. Mar 1990 A
4919786 Hamner Apr 1990 A
4919788 Chen et al. Apr 1990 A
4923841 Hamner May 1990 A
4929795 Cody et al. May 1990 A
4935120 Lipinski et al. Jun 1990 A
4937399 Wachter et al. Jun 1990 A
4943672 Hamner Jul 1990 A
4959337 Cody et al. Sep 1990 A
4960504 Pellet et al. Oct 1990 A
4962269 LaPierre et al. Oct 1990 A
4982031 Chen Jan 1991 A
4990713 Le et al. Feb 1991 A
4992159 Cody Feb 1991 A
4992406 Mauldin et al. Feb 1991 A
5015361 Anthes et al. May 1991 A
5037528 Garwood et al. Aug 1991 A
5059299 Cody et al. Oct 1991 A
5059741 Foley Oct 1991 A
5075269 Degnan et al. Dec 1991 A
5110445 Chen et al. May 1992 A
5120425 Zones et al. Jun 1992 A
5128377 Behrmann et al. Jul 1992 A
5156114 Gunnerman Oct 1992 A
5157187 Le et al. Oct 1992 A
5158671 Cody et al. Oct 1992 A
5183556 Reilly et al. Feb 1993 A
5187138 Davis Feb 1993 A
5210347 Chen et al. May 1993 A
5281347 Igarashi et al. Jan 1994 A
5282958 Santilli et al. Feb 1994 A
5292988 Wu Mar 1994 A
5292989 Davis Mar 1994 A
5300212 Winter, Jr. Apr 1994 A
5302279 Degnan et al. Apr 1994 A
5306860 Bigeard et al. Apr 1994 A
5308365 Kesling, Jr. et al. May 1994 A
5324335 Benham et al. Jun 1994 A
5345019 Bigeard et al. Sep 1994 A
5348982 Herbolzheimer et al. Sep 1994 A
5362378 Borghard et al. Nov 1994 A
5370788 Dai Dec 1994 A
5378249 Morrison Jan 1995 A
5378348 Davis et al. Jan 1995 A
5378351 Guichard et al. Jan 1995 A
5385588 Brennan Jan 1995 A
5466362 Steinberg et al. Nov 1995 A
5479775 Kraemer et al. Jan 1996 A
5500449 Benham et al. Mar 1996 A
5504118 Benham et al. Apr 1996 A
5506272 Benham et al. Apr 1996 A
5522983 Cash et al. Jun 1996 A
5527473 Ackerman Jun 1996 A
5538522 Ahmed Jul 1996 A
5543437 Benham et al. Aug 1996 A
5545674 Behrmann et al. Aug 1996 A
5689031 Berlowitz et al. Nov 1997 A
5766274 Wittenbrink et al. Jun 1998 A
5807413 Wittenbrink et al. Sep 1998 A
5814109 Cook et al. Sep 1998 A
5833839 Wittenbrink et al. Nov 1998 A
5866748 Wittenbrink et al. Feb 1999 A
6080301 Berlowitz et al. Jun 2000 A
6162956 Berlowitz et al. Dec 2000 A
6168768 Alexion et al. Jan 2001 B1
6180842 Berlowitz et al. Jan 2001 B1
RE37229 Behrmann et al. Jun 2001 E
6274029 Wittenbrink et al. Aug 2001 B1
RE37406 Behrmann et al. Oct 2001 E
6296757 Wittenbrink et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309432 Wittenbrink et al. Oct 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (72)
Number Date Country
275062 Jul 1964 AU
539698 Apr 1957 CA
700237 Dec 1964 CA
954058 Sep 1974 CA
2251156 Apr 1973 DE
3030998 Jan 1982 DE
3030998 Apr 1982 DE
0113045 Nov 1984 EP
0153782 Sep 1985 EP
0227218 Jul 1987 EP
0266898 May 1988 EP
0281992 Sep 1988 EP
0323092 Dec 1988 EP
0321301 Jun 1989 EP
0418860 Mar 1991 EP
0374461 May 1992 EP
0515256 Nov 1992 EP
0515270 Nov 1992 EP
0532117 Mar 1993 EP
0532118 Mar 1993 EP
0441014 Apr 1993 EP
0542528 May 1993 EP
0555006 Aug 1993 EP
0566348 Oct 1993 EP
0587245 Mar 1994 EP
0587246 Mar 1994 EP
0634472 Jan 1995 EP
0460957 Aug 1995 EP
0668342 Aug 1995 EP
0753563 Jan 1997 EP
0569228 Jun 1998 EP
732964 Mar 1932 FR
859686 Aug 1939 FR
2137490 Apr 1972 FR
2650289 Jan 1991 FR
728543 Apr 1955 GB
823010 Nov 1959 GB
848198 Sep 1960 GB
951997 Mar 1964 GB
953188 Mar 1964 GB
953189 Mar 1964 GB
1065205 Apr 1967 GB
1306646 Feb 1973 GB
1342500 Jan 1974 GB
1342499 Mar 1974 GB
1381004 Jan 1975 GB
1440230 Jun 1976 GB
1460476 Jan 1977 GB
1493928 Nov 1977 GB
1499570 Feb 1978 GB
6200262 Jan 1924 JP
7310096 Nov 1928 JP
49035323 Apr 1974 JP
H2302561 Oct 1991 JP
9201769 Feb 1992 WO
9202601 Feb 1992 WO
9214804 Sep 1992 WO
9417160 Aug 1994 WO
9420593 Sep 1994 WO
9428095 Dec 1994 WO
9502695 Jan 1995 WO
9503377 Feb 1995 WO
9506695 Mar 1995 WO
9527021 Oct 1995 WO
9623855 Aug 1996 WO
9626996 Sep 1996 WO
9721788 Nov 1996 WO
9703750 Feb 1997 WO
9704044 Feb 1997 WO
9714768 Apr 1997 WO
9714769 Apr 1997 WO
9721787 Jun 1997 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (52)
Entry
Ward et al., “Compos. of F-T Diesel Fuel”, Div. Pet. Chem. 117th Mtg. ACS (1950).
Morgan et al, “Some Comparative Chemical, Physical and Compatibility Properties of Sasol Slurry Phase Distillate Diesel Fuel”, SAE No. 982488 (1998), pp. 1-9.
Agee, “A New Horizon for Synthetic Fuels”, World Conference on Transportation Fuel Quality Oct. 6-8, 1996.
Norton et al, “Emissions from Trucks using Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuel”, SAE No. 982526, pp. 1-10 (1998).
Booth et al (Shell) “Severe hydrotreating of diesel can cause fuel-injector pump failure”, PennWell Publishing Company, Oil & Gas Journal (Aug. 16, 1993).
The Clean Fuels Report, “Volvo Demonstrates Benefits of Reformulated Diesel” “Research and Technology”, pp. 166-170, Sep. 1995.
The Clean Fuels Report, “Cetane Number is Major Control for Diesel Emissions with Catalyst”, pp. 170-173, Sep. 1995.
Signer et al, “European Programme on Emissions, Fuels and Engine Technologies (EPEFE) -Heavy Duty Diesel Study”, SAE No. 961074, pp. 1-21, International Sprin Guels & Lubricants Meeting, Michigan, May 6-8, 1996.
Erwin et al, “The Standing of Fischer-Tropsch in an Assay of Fuel Performance and Emissons”, Southwest Research Institute, Contract No. NREL SUB YZ-2-113215-1 (Oct. 26, 1993).
M'Hamdi et al, “Packed Column SFC of Gas Oils”, J. High Resol.Chromatogr., vol. 21, pp. 94-102 (Feb. 1998).
Fraile et al, “Experimental Design Optimization of the Separation of the Aromatic Compounds in Petroleum Cuts by Supercricial Fluid Chromatography”, Journal of High Resolution Chromatography, vol. 16, pp. 169-174 (Mar. 1993).
Andersson et al, “Characterization of fuels by multi-dimensional supercritical fluid chromatography and supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry”, Journal of Chromatography, 641, pp. 347-355 (1993).
Di Sanzo et al, “Determination of Aromatics in Jet and Diesel Fuels by Supercritical Fluid Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection (SFC-FID): A Quantitative Study”, Journal of Chromatographic Science, vol. 29, Jan. 1991.
Lee et al, “Development of Supercritical Fluid Chromatographic Method for Determination of Aromatics in Heating Oils and Diesel Fuels”, Energy & Fuels, 3, pp. 80-84 (1989), American Chemical Society.
T. L. Ullman et al., “Effects of Cetane Number, Cetane Improver, Aromatics, and Oxygenates on 1994 Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Emissions”, SAE Paper 941020.
K. B. Spreen et al., “Effects of Cetane Number, Aromatics, and Oxygenates on Emissions From a 1994 Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine With Exhaust Catalyst”, SAE Paper 950250.
T. L. Ullman et al., “Effects of Cetane Number on Emissions From a Prototype 1998 Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine”, SAE Paper 950251.
J. S. Feeley et al., “Abatement of NOx from Diesel Engines: Status & Technical Challenges”, SAE Paper 950747.
J. Leyrer et al., “Design Aspects of Lean NOx Catalysts for Gasoline & Diesel Applications”, SAE Paper 952495.
M. Kawanami et al., “Advanced Catalyst Studies of Diesel NOx Reduction for On-Highway Trucks”, SAE Paper 950154.
Anderson et al., “Det. of Ox and Olefin Compd Types by IR . . . ”, Analyt. Chem., vol. 20, No. 11 (Nov. 1946), pp. 998-1006.
Bruner, “Syn. Gasoline From Nat. Gas”, Ind. & Eng. Chem., vol. 41, No. 11 (1948), pp. 2511-2515.
Bryant et al., “Impr. Hydroxylamine Meth. for Det. Aldeh. & Ketones . . . ”, p. 57 (Jan. 1935).
DuBois et al., “Det. of Bromine Addition Numbers”, Analyt. Chem., vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 624-627 (1948).
Friedel et al., “Compos. of Synth. Liquid Fuels. I . . . ”, JACS 72, pp. 1212-1215 (1950).
Johnston et al., “Det. of Olefins in Gasoline”, Analyt. Chem. 805-812 (1947).
Niederl et al., “Micromethods of Quantitative Organic Analysis”, pp. 263-272, 2nd ed. (J. Wiley & Sons, NY 1942).
Puckett et al., “Ignition Qualities of HC in the Diesel Fuel Boiling Range” in Information Circular Bureau of Mines 7474 (Jul. 1948).
Smith et al., “Rapid Det. of Hydroxyl . . . ”, p. 61 (Jan. 1935).
Tilton et al., “Prod. of High Cetane Number Diesel Fuels by Hydrogenation”, Ind. & Eng. Chemistry, vol. 40, pp. 1270-1279 (Jul. 1948).
Underwood, “Industrial Synthesis of HC from Hydrogen and Carbon Monoxide”, Ind. & Eng. Chemistry, vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 450-454.
Ward et al., “Superfractionation Studies”, Ind. & Eng. Chem. vol. 39, pp. 105-109 (109th ACS meeting).
Wheeler, “Peroxide Formation as a Meas. of Autoxidative Determination”, Oil & Soap 7, 87 (1936).
Eilers et al., “Shell Middle Dist.” Cat. Letters 7, 253-270 (1990).
Lanh et al., J. Cat., 129, 58-66 (1991), Convers. of Cyclohexane . . . .
Rappold, “Industry pushes use of PDC bits . . . ”, J. Oil & Gas, Aug. 14, 1995.
Shah et al, USDOE/USDOC NTIS, UOP, Inc., Fischer-Tropsch Wax Characterization and Upgrading -Final Report, DE 88-014638, Jun. 1988 (“UOP Report”).
Signer, The Clean Fuels Report, “Southwest Research Institute Study Delineates the Effect of Diesel Fuel Composition on Emissions”, pp. 153-158 (Jun. 1995).
Lacy, “The U.S. Army Scuffing Load Wear Test”, Jan. 1, 1994.
Ryland et al, “Cracking Catalyst”, Catalysis vol. VII, P. Emmett, ed., Reinhold Publ. NY (1960), pp. 5-9.
Stournas et al., “Eff. of Fatty Acids . . . ”, JAOC S 72 (4) (1995).
W. Li et al, “Group-Type Separation of Diesel Fuels Using Packed Capillary column Supercritical Fluid Chromatography” Anal. Chem., 1995, 67, 647-654.
Jimell Erwin, “Assay of Diesel Fuel Components Properties and Performance”, ACS Symposium on Processing & Selectivity of Synthetic Fuels, pp. 1915-1923, Aug. 23-28, 1992.
P. Andersson et al, “Quantitative Hydrocarbon Group Analysis of Gasoline and Diesel Fuel by Supercritical Fluid Chromatography”, Journal of Chromatography, 595 (1992), pp. 301-311.
S. Win Lee, “Initial Validation of a New Procedure for Determining Aromatics in Petroleum Distillates”, Journal of Liquid Chromatography, 13 (16), pp. 3211-3227, (1990).
Fuhr et al., “Determination of Aromatic Types in Middle Distillates by Supercritical Fluid Chromatography”, LC-GC, vol. 8, No. 10, pp. 800-804 (1990).
S. Win Lee, “Investigation of Methods for Aromatic Structural Information in Middle Distillate Fuels”, 196th ACS Nat'l Meeting, ACS Div. Fuel Chem. Prepr., vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 883-890 (1988).
P. Sohar, “Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy”, vol. II, pp. 92-102, CRC Press (1988).
A. Goldup et al., “Determination of Trace Quantities of Water in Hydrocarbons”, Analytical Chemistry, vol. 38, No. 12, pp. 1657-1661, Nov. 1996.
Lacey, Paul I., “Wear Mechanism Evaluation and Measurement in Fuel Lubricated Components”, U.S. Dept. of Commerce #FDA 284870, Sep. 1984.
SwR1 GEar Oil Scuff Test (GOST) Flyer, Gear Oil Scuff Test (GOST), Feb. 1997.
Lu-Kwang Ju et al., “Oxygen Diffusion Coefficient and Solubility in n-Hexadecane”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 34, Nov. 1989, pp. 1221-1224.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/544343 Oct 1995 US
Child 09/464179 US