Synthetic diesel fuel and process for its production

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6822131
  • Patent Number
    6,822,131
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 17, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 23, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
Clean distillate useful as a diesel fuel or diesel blending stock is produced from Fischer-Tropsch wax by separating wax into heavier and lighter fractions; further separating the lighter fraction and hydroisomerizing the heavier fraction and that portion of the light fraction below about 500° F. The isomerized product is blended with the untreated portion of the lighter fraction.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to a distillate material having a high cetane number and useful as a diesel fuel or as a blending stock therefor, as well as the process for preparing the distillate. More particularly, this invention relates to a process for preparing distillate from a Fischer-Tropsch wax.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Clean distillates that contain no or nil sulfur, nitrogen, or aromatics, are, or will likely be in great demand as diesel fuel or in blending diesel fuel. Clean distillates having relatively high cetane number are particularly valuable. Typical petroleum derived distillates are not clean, in that they typically contain significant amounts of sulfur, nitrogen, and aromatics, and they have relatively low octane numbers. Clean distillates can be produced from petroleum based distillates through severe hydrotreating at great expense. Such severe hydrotreating imparts relatively little improvement in cetane number and also adversely impacts the fuels lubricity. Fuel lubricity, required for the efficient operation of fuel delivery system, can be improved by the use of costly additive packages. The production of clean, high cetane number distillates from Fischer-Tropsch waxes has been discussed in the open literature, but the processes disclosed for preparing such distillates also leave the distillate lacking in one or more important properties, e.g., lubricity. The Fischer-Tropsch distillates disclosed, therefore, require blending with other less desirable stocks or the use of costly additives. These earlier schemes disclose hydrotreating the total Fischer-Tropsch product, including the entire 700° F.−fraction. This hydro-treating results in the elimination of oxygenates from the distillate.




By virtue of this present invention small amounts of oxygenates are retained, the resulting product having both very high cetane number and high lubricity. This product is useful as a diesel fuel as such, or as a blending stock for preparing diesel fuels from other lower grade material.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with this invention, a clean distillate useful as a diesel fuel or as a diesel fuel blend stock and having a cetane number of at least about 60, preferably at least about 70, more preferably at least about 74, is produced, preferably from a Fischer-Tropsch wax and preferably derived from a cobalt or ruthenium catalyst, by separating the waxy product into a heavier fraction and a lighter fraction; the nominal separation being at about 700° F. Thus, the heavier fraction contains primarily 700° F.+, and the lighter fraction contains primarily 700° F.−.




The distillate is produced by fisher separating the 700° F.− fraction into at least two other fractions: (i) one of which contains primary C


12


+ alcohols and (ii) one of which does not contain such alcohols. The fraction (ii) is preferably a 500° F.− fraction, more preferably a 600° F.− fraction, and still more preferably a C


5


-500° F. fraction, or a C


5


-600° F. fraction. This fraction (ii) and the heavier fraction are subjected to hydroisomerion in the presence of a hydroisomerization catalyst and at hydroisomerization conditions. The hydroisomerization of these fractions may occur separately or in the same reaction zone, preferably in the same zone. In any event at least a portion of the 700° F.+ material is converted to 700° F.− material. Subsequently, at least a portion and preferably all of the 700° F.− material from hydroisomerization is combined with at least a portion and preferably all of the fraction (ii) which is preferably a 500-700° F. fraction, and more preferably a 600-700° F. fraction, and is further preferably characterized by the absence of any hydrotreating, e.g, hydroisomerization. From the combined product a diesel fuel or diesel blending stock boiling in the range 250-700° F. is recovered and has the properties described below.











DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic of a process in accordance with this invention.





FIG. 2

is a plot of peroxide number (ordinate), test time in days (abscissa) for the 250-500° F. fraction (upper curve) and a 500-700° F. fraction (lower curve).











DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A more detailed description of this invention may be had by referring to the drawing. Synthesis gas, hydrogen and carbon monoxide. in an appropriate ratio, contained in line1 is fed to a Fischer-Tropsch reactor 2, preferably a slurry reactor and product is recovered in lines 3 and 4, 700° F.+ and 700° F.− respectively. The lighter fraction goes through hot separator 6 and a 500-700° F. fraction is recovered in line 8, while a 500° F.+ fraction is recovered in line 7. The 500° F.− material goes through cold separator 9 from which C


4


-gases are recovered in line 10. A C


5


-500° F. fraction is recovered in line 11 and is combined with the 700° F.+ fraction in line 3. At least a portion and preferably most, more preferably essentially all of the 500° F. -700° F. fraction is blended with the hydroisomerized product in line 12.




The heavier, e.g., 700° F.+ fraction, in line 3 together with the lighter, e.g., C


5


-500° F. fraction from line 11 is sent to hydroisomerization unit 5. The reactor of the hydroisomerization unit operates at typical conditions shown in the table below:




The hydroisomerization process is well known and the table below lists some broad and preferred conditions for this step.

















Condition




Broad Range




Preferred Range











temperature, ° F.




300-800 




550-750






total pressure, psig




 0-2500




 300-1200






hydrogen treat rate, SCF/B




500-5000




2000-4000






hydrogen consumption rate, SCF/B




50-500




100-300














While virtually any catalyst useful in hydroisomerization or selective hydrocracking may be satisfactory for this step, some catalysts perform better than others and are preferred For example, catalysts containing a supported Group VM noble metal, e.g., platinum or palladium, are useful as are catalysts containing one or more Group VIII base metal e.g., nickel, cobalt, in amounts of 0.5-20 Wt % which may or may not also include a Group VI metal, e.g., molybdenum, in amounts of 1.0-20 wt %. The support for the metals can be any refractory oxide or zeolite or mixtures thereof. Preferred supports include silica, alumina, silica-alumina. silica-alumina phosphates, titania, zirconia, vanadia and other Group III, IV, or VA or VI oxides, as well as Y sieves, such as ultrastable Y sieves. Preferred supports include alumina and silica-alumina where the silica concentration of the bulk support is less than about 50 wt %, preferably less than about 35 wt %.




A preferred catalyst has a surface area in the range of about 200-500 m


2


/gm, preferably 0.35 to 0.80 ml/mg, as determined by water adsorption. and a bulk density of about 0.05-1.0 g/ml.




This catalyst comprises a non-noble Group VIII metal, eg., iron, nickel, in conjunction with a Group IB metal, e.g., copper, supported on an acidic support The support is preferably an amorphous silica-alumina where the alumina is present in amounts of less than about 30 wt %, preferably 5-30 wt %, more preferably 10-20 wt %. Also, the support may contain small amounts , e.g., 20-30 wt %, of a binder, e.g., alumina, silica, Group IVA metal oxides, and various types of clays, magnesia, etc., preferably alumina.




The preparation of amorphous silica-alumina microspheres has been described in Ryland, Lloyd B., Tamele, M. W., and Wilson, J. N., Cracking Catalysts, Catalysis: volume VII, Ed. Paul H. Emmett, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 1960, pp. 5-9.




The catalyst is prepared by coimpregnating the metals from solutions onto the support, drying at 100-150° C., and calcining in air at 200-550° C.




The Group VIII metal is present in amounts of about 15 wt % or less, preferably 1-12 wt %, while the Group IB metal is usually present in lesser amounts, e.g, 1:2 to about 1:20 ratio respecting the Group VIII metal. A typical catalyst is shown below:






















Ni, wt %




2.5-3.5








Cu, wt %




0.25-0.35








Al


2


O


3


—SiO


2






65-75








Al


2


O


3


(binder)




25-30








Surface Area




290-325




m


2


/gm







Pore Volume (Hg)




0.35-0.45




ml/gm







Bulk Density




0.58-0.68




g/ml















The 700° F.+ conversion to 700° F.− ranges from about 20-80%, preferably 20-50(%, more preferably about 30-500%. During hydroisomerization, essentially all olefins and oxygen containing materials are hydrogenated.




The hydroisomerization product is recovered in line 12 into which the 500-700° F. stream of line 8 is blended. The blended stream is fractionated in tower 13, from which 700° F.− is, optionally, recycled in line 14 back to line 3, C


5


- is recovered in line 16, and may be mixed with light gases from the cold separator 9 in line 10 to form stream 17. A clean distillate boiling in the range of 250-700° F. is recovered in line 15. This distillate has unique properties and may be used as a diesel fuel or as a blending component for diesel fuel.




Passing the C


5


-500° F. fraction through the hydroisomerization unit has the effect of further lowering the olefin concentration in the product streams 12 and 15, thereby further improving the oxidative stability of the product. Olefin concentration in the product is less than 0.5 wt %, preferably less than 0.1 wt %. Thus, the olefin concentration is sufficiently low as to make olefin recovery unnecessary; and further treatment of the fraction for olefins is avoided.




The separation of the 700° F.− stream into a C


5


-500° F. stream and a 500-700° F. stream and the hydroisomerization of C


5


-500° F. stream leads, as mentioned, to lower olefin concentrations in the product. Additionally, however, the oxygen containing compounds in the C


5


-500° F. have the effect of lowering the methane yield from hydroisomerization. Ideally, a hydroisomerization reaction involves little or no cracking of the Fischer-Tropsch paraffins. Ideal conditions are not often achieved and some cracking to gases, particularly CH


4


, always accompanies this reaction. By virtue of the processing scheme disclosed herein methane yields from hydroisomerion the 700° F.+ fraction with the C


5


-500° F. fraction allows reductions in methane yields on the order of at least 50%, preferably at least 75%.




The diesel material recovered from the fractionator has the properties shown in the following table:


















paraffins




at least 95 wt %, preferably at least 96 wt %, more







preferably at least 97 wt %, still more preferably at







least 98 wt %, and most preferably at least 99 wt %






iso/normal ratio




about 0.3 to 3.0, preferably 0.7-2.0






sulfur




≦ 50 ppm (wt), preferably nil






nitrogen




≦50 ppm (wt), preferably ≦20 ppm, more







preferably nil






unsaturates




≦0.5 wt %, preferably ≦ 0.1 wt %






(olefins and






aromatics)






oxygenates




about 0.001 to less than about 0.3 wt % oxygen,







water free basis














The iso-paraffins are normally mono-methyl branched, and since the process utilizes Fischer-Tropsch wax, the product contains nil cyclic paraffins, e.g., no cyclohexane.




The oxygenates are contained essentially, e.g., ≧95% of oxygenates, in the lighter fraction, e.g., the 700° F.− fraction.




The preferred Fischer-Tropsch process is one that utilizes a nonshifting (that is, no water gas shift capability) catalyst, such as cobalt or ruthenium or mixtures thereof, preferably cobalt, and preferably a promoted cobalt, the promoter being zirconium or rhenium, preferably rhenium Such catalysts are well known and a preferred catalyst is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,568,663 as well as European Patent 0 266 898.




The products of the Fischer-Tropsch process are primarily paraffinic hydrocarbons. Ruthenium produces paraffins primarily boiling in the distillate range, i.e., C


10


-C


20


; while cobalt catalysts generally produce more of heavier hydrocarbons, e.g., C


20


+, and cobalt is a preferred Fischer-Tropsch catalytic metal.




Good diesel fuels generally have the properties of high cetane number, usually 50 or higher, preferably 60,more preferably at least about 65, or higher lubricity, oxidative stability, and physical properties compatible with diesel pipeline specifications.




The product of this invention can be used as a diesel fuel, per se, or blended with other less desirable petroleum or hydrocarbon containing feeds of about the same boiling range. When used as a blend, the product of this invention can be used in relatively minor amounts, e.g., 10% or more, for significantly improving the final blended diesel product Although, the product of this invention will improve almost any diesel product, it is especially desirable to blend this product with refinery diesel streams of low quality. Typical streams are raw or hydrogenated catalytic or thermally cracked distillates and gas oils.




By virtue of using the Fischer-Tropsch process, the recovered distillate has essentially nil sulfur and nitrogen. These hereto-atom compounds are poisons for Fischer-Tropsch catalysts and are removed from the methane containing natural gas that is a convenient feed for the Fischer-Tropsch process. (Sulfur and nitrogen containing compounds are, in any event, in exceedingly low concentrations in natural gas. Further, the process does not make aromatics, or as usually operated virtually no aromatics are produced Some olefins are produced since one of the proposed pathways for the production of paraffins is through an olefinic intermediate. Nevertheless, olefin concentration is usually quite low.




Oxygenated compounds including alcohols and some acids are produced during Fischer-Tropsch processing, but in at least one well known process, oxygenates and unsaturates are completely eliminated from the product by hydrotreating. See, for example, the Shell Middle Distillate Process, Eiler, J., Posthuma, S. A., Sic, S. T., Catalysis Letters, 1990, 7, 253-270.




We have found, however, hat small amounts of oxygenates, preferably alcohols, usually concentrated in the 500-700° F. fraction provide exceptional lubricity for diesel fuels. For example, as illustrations will show a highly paraffinic diesel fuel with small amounts of oxygenates has excellent lubricity as shown by the BOCLE test (ball on cylinder lubricity evaluator). However, the oxygenates were removed, for example, by extraction, absorption over molecular sieves, hydroprocessing, etc., to a level of less than 10 ppm wt % oxygen (water free basis) in the fraction being tested, the lubricity was quite poor.




By virtue of the processing scheme disclosed in this invention a part of the lighter, 700° F.− fraction i.e., the 500° F.-700° F. fraction is not subjected to any hydrotreating In the absence of hydrotreating of this fraction, the small amount of oxygenates, primarily linear alcohols, in this fraction are preserved, while oxygenates in the heavier fraction are eliminated during the hydro-isomerization step. Some oxygenates contained in the C


5


-500° F. fraction will be converted to pars during hydroisomerization. However, the valuable oxygen containing compounds, for lubricity purposes most preferably C


12


-C


18


primary alcohols are in the untreated 500-700° F. fraction. Hydroisomerization also serves to increase the amount of iso paraffins in the distillate fuel and helps the fuel to meet pour point and cloud point specifications, although additives may be employed for these purposes.




The oxygen compounds that are believed to promote lubricity may be described as having a hydrogen bonding energy greater than the bonding energy of hydrocarbons (these energy measurements for various compounds are available in standard references); the greater the difference, the greater the lubricity effect The oxygen compounds also have a lipophilic end and a hydrophilic end to allow wetting of the fuel.




Preferred oxygen compounds, primarily alcohols, have a relatively long chain, i.e., C


12


+, more preferably C


12


-C


24


primary linear alcohols.




While acids are oxygen containing compounds, acids are corrosive and are produced in quite small amounts during Fischer-Tropsch processing at non-shift conditions. Acids are also di-oxygenates as opposed to the preferred mono-oxygenates illustrated by the linear alcohols. Thus, di- or poly-oxygenates are usually undetectable by infra red measurements and are, e.g., less than about 15 wppm oxygen as oxygen.




Non-shifting Fischer-Tropsch reactions are well known to those skilled in the art and may be characterized by conditions that minimize the formation of CO


2


by products These conditions can be achieved by a variety of methods, including one or more of the following: operating at relatively low CO partial pressures, that is, operating at hydrogen to CO ratios of at least about 1.7/1,preferably about 1.7/1 to about 2.5/1, more preferably at least about 1.9/1, and in the range 1.9/1 to about 2.3/1, all with an alpha of at least about 0.88, preferably at least about 0.91; temperatures of about 175-225° C. preferably 180-210° C; using catalysts comprising cobalt or ruthenium as the primary Fischer-Tropsch catalysts agent.




The amount of oxygenates present, as oxygen on a water free basis is relatively small to achieve the desired lubricity, i.e., at least about 0.001 wt % oxygen (water free basis), preferably 0.001-0.3 wt % oxygen (water free basis), more preferably 0.0025-0.3 wt % oxygen (water free basis).




The following examples will serve to illustrate, but not limit this invention.




Hydrogen and carbon monoxide synthesis gas (H


2


:CO 2.11-2.16) were converted to heavy paraffins in a slurry Fischer-Tropsch reactor. The catalyst utilized for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction was a titania supported cobalt/rhenium catalyst previously described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,568,663. The reaction conditions were 422428° F., 287-289 psig, and a linear velocity of 12 to 17.5 cm/sec. The alpha of the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis step was 0.92. The paraffinic Fischer-Tropsch product was then isolated in three nominally different boiling streams, separated utilizing a rough flash The three approximate boiling fractions were: 1) the C


5


-500° F. boiling fraction, designated below as F-T Cold separator Liquids; 2) the 500-700° F. boiling faction designated below as F-T Hot Separator Liquids; and 3) the 700° F.+ boiling fraction designated below at F-T Reactor Wax.




EXAMPLE 1




Seventy wt % of a Hydroisomerized F-T Reactor Wax, 16.8 wt % Hydrotreated F-T Cold Separator Liquids and 13.2 wt % Hydrotreated F-T Hot Separator Liquids were combined and rigorously mixed. Diesel Fuel A was the 260-700° FF. boiling fraction of this blend, as isolated by distillation, and was prepared as follows: the hydroisomerized F-T Reactor Wax was prepared in flow through, fixed bed unit using a cobalt and molybdenum promoted amorphous silica-alumina catalyst, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5.292,989 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,348. Hydroisomerization conditions were 708° F., 750 psig H


2


, 2500 SCF/B H


2


, and a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.74.8. Hydro-isomerization was conducted with recycle of unreacted 7000F.+ reactor wax. The Combined Feed Ratio (Fresh Feed+Recycle Feed)/Fresh Feed equaled 1.5. Hydrotreated F-T Cold and Hot Separator Liquid were prepared using a flow through fixed bed reactor and commercial massive nickel catalyst. Hydrotreating conditions were 450° F., 430 psig H


2


, 1000 SCF/B H


2


, and 3.0 LHSV. Fuel A is representative of a typical of a completely hydrotreated cobalt derived Fischer-Tropsch diesel fuel, well known in the art.




EXAMPLE 2




Seventy Eight wt % of a Hydroisomerized F-T Reactor Wax, 12 wt % Unhydrotreated F-T Cold Separator Liquids, and 10 wt % F-T Hot Separator Liquids were combined and mixed. Diesel Fuel B was the 250-700° F. boiling fraction of this blend, as isolated by distillation, and was prepared as follows: the Hydroisomerized F-T Reactor Wax was prepared in flow through, fixed bed unit using a cobalt and molybdenum promoted amorphous silica-alumina catalyst, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,292,989 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,348. Hydroisomerization conditions were 690° F., 725 psig H


2


, 2500 SCF/B H


2


, and a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of0.6-0.7. Fuel B is a representative example of this invention.




EXAMPLE 3




Diesel Fuels C and D were prepared by distilling Fuel B into two fractions. Diesel Fuel C represents the 250° F. to 500° F. fraction of Diesel Fuel B. Diesel Fuel D represents the 500-700° F. fraction of Diesel Fuel B.




EXAMPLE 4




100.81 grams of Diesel Fuel B was contacted with 33.11 grams of Grace Silico-aluminate zeolite:13X Grade 544, 812 mesh beads. Diesel Fuel E is the filtrated liquid resulting from this treatment This treatment effectively removes alcohols and other oxygenates from the fuel.




EXAMPLE 5




Oxygenate, dioxygenate, and alcohol composition of Diesel Fuels A, B, and E were measured using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (


1


H-NMR), Infrared Spectroscopy (IR), and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS).


1


H-NMR experiments were done using a Brucker MSL-500 Spectrometer. Quantitative data were obtained by measuring the samples, dissolved in CDCl


3


, at ambient temperature, using a frequency of 500.13 MHz. pulse width of 2.9 s (45 degree tip angle), delay of 60 s, and 64 scans. Tetramethylsilane was used as an internal reference in each case and dioxane was used as an internal standard. Levels of primary alcohols secondary alcohols, esters and acids were estimated directly by comparing integrals for peaks at 3.6 (2H), 3.4 (I H), 4.1 (2H) and 2.4 (2H) ppm respectively, with that of the internal standard. IR Spectroscopy was done using a Nicolet 800 spectrometer. Samples were prepared by placing them in a KBr fixed path length cell (nominally 1.0 mm) and acquisition was done by adding 4096 scans a 0.3 cm


−1


resolution. Levels of dioxygenates, such as carboxylic acids and esters, were measured using the absorbance at 1720 and 1738 cm


−1


, respectively. GC/MS were performed using either a Hewlett-Packard 5980/Hewlett-Packard 5970B Mass Selective Detector Combination (MSD) or Kratos Model MS-890 GC/MS. Selected ion monitoring of m/z 31 (CH


3


O


+


) was used to quantify the primary alcohols. An external standard was made by weighing C


2


-C


14


, C


16


and C


18


primary alcohols into mixture of C


8


-C


16


normal paraffins. Olefins were determined using Bromine Index, as described in ASTSM D 2710. Results from these analyses are presented in Table 1. Diesel Fuel B which contains the unhydro-treated hot and cold separator liquids contains a significant amount of oxygenates as linear, primary alcohols. A significant fraction of these are the important C


12


-C


18


primary alcohols. It is these alcohols that impart superior performance in diesel lubricity. Hydrotreating (Diesel Fuel A) is extremely effective at removing essentially all of the oxygenates and olefins. Mole sieve treatment (Diesel Fuel E) also is effective at removing the alcohol contaminants without the use of process hydrogen. None of these fuels contain significant levels of dioxygenates, such as carboxylic acids or esters.












TABLE 1











Oxygenate, and dioxygenate (carboxylic acids, esters) composition of All






Hydrotreated Diesel Fuel (Diesel Fuel A), Partially Hydrotreated Diesel






Fuel (Diesel Fuel B), and the Mole Sieve Treated, Partially Hydrotreated






Diesel Fuel (Diesel Fuel E)















Diesel




Diesel




Diesel







Fuel A




Fuel B




Fuel E


















wppm Oxygen in dioxygenates,




None




None




None






(carboxylic acids, esters) (IR)




Detected




Detected




Detected






wppm Oxygen in C


5


-C


18


primary




None




640 ppm




None






alcohols (


1


H NMR)




Detected





Detected






wppm Oxygen in C


5


-C


18


primary




5.3




824 ppm




None






alcohols (GC/MS)






Detected






wppm Oxygen in C


12


-C


18


primary




3.3




195 ppm




None






alcohols (GC/MS)






Detected






Total Olefins-mmol/g (Bromine




0.004




0.78











Index, ASTM D 2710)














EXAMPLE 6




Diesel Fuels A-E were all tested using a standard Ball on Cylinder Lubricity Evaluation (BOCLE), further described as Lacey, P. I . “The U.S. Army Scuffing Load Wear Test”, Jan. 1, 1994. This test is based on ASTM D 5001. Results are reported in Table 2 as percents of Reference Fuel 2, described in Lacey.












TABLE 2











BOCLE results for Fuels A-E. Results reported






as percents of Reference Fuel 2 as described in














Diesel Fuel




% Reference Fuel 2











A




42.1







B




88.9







C




44.7







D




94.7







E




30.6















The completely hydrotreated Diesel Fuel A, exhibits very low lubricity typical of an all paraffin diesel fuel. Diesel Fuel B, which contains a high level of oxygenates as linear, C


5


C


24


primary alcohols, exhibits significantly superior lubricity properties. Diesel Fuel E was prepared by separating the oxygenates away from Diesel Fuel B through adsorption by 13× molecular sieves. Diesel Fuel E exhibits very poor lubricity indicating the linear C


5


-C


24


primary alcohols are responsible for the high lubricity of Diesel Fuel B. Diesel Fuels C and D represent the 250-500° F. and the 500-700° F. boiling fractions of Diesel Fuel B, respectively. Diesel Fuel C contains the linear C


5


-C


11


primary alcohols that boil below 500° F., and Diesel Fuel D contains the C


12


-C


24


primary alcohols that boil between 500-700° F. Diesel Fuel D exhibits superior lubricity properties compared to Diesel Fuel C. and is in fact superior in performance to Diesel Fuel B from which it is derived. This clearly indicates that the C


12


-C


24


primary alcohols that boil between 500-700° F. are important to producing a high lubricity saturated fuel. The fact that Diesel Fuel B exhibits lower lubricity than Diesel Fuel D also indicates that the light oxygenates contained in 250-500F. fraction of Diesel Fuel B adversely limit the beneficial impact of the C


12


C


24


primary alcohols, contained in the 500-700° F. of Diesel Fuel B. It is therefore desirable produce a Diesel Fuel with a minimum amount of the undesirable C


5


-C


11


light primary alcohols, but with maximum amounts of the beneficial C


12


-C


24


primary alcohols. This can be accomplished by selectively hydrotreating the 2O500° F. boiling cold separator liquids, and not the 500-700° F. boiling hot separator liquids.




EXAMPLE 7




The oxidative stability of Diesel Fuels C and D were tested by observing the buildup of hydroperoxides over time. Diesel Fuel C and D represent the 250-500° F. and 500-700° F. boiling fractions of Diesel Fuel B, respectively. This test is fully described in ASTM D3703. More stable fuels will exhibit a slower rate of increase in the titrimetric hydroperoxide number. The peroxide level of each sample is determined by iodometric titration, at the start and at periodic intervals during the test. Due to the inherent stability both of these fuels, both were aged at 25° C. (room temperature) for 7 weeks before starting the peroxide.

FIG. 2

shows the buildup over time for both Diesel Fuels C and D. It can be seen clearly that the 250-500° F. boiling Diesel Fuel C is much less stable than the 500-700° F. boiling Diesel Fuel D. The relative instability of Diesel Fuel C results from the fact that it contains greater than 90% of the olefins found in Diesel Fuel B. Olefins are well known in the art to cause oxidative instability. This saturation of these relatively unstable light olefins is an additional reason for hydrotreating and 250-500° F. cold separator liquids.



Claims
  • 1. A distillate faction useful as a fuel heavier than gasoline or as a blending component for a distillate fuel comprising:a 250-700° F. distillate fraction derived from a Fischer-Tropsch catalytic process and containing at least 95 wt. % paraffins a cetane number of at least 60 ≦50 ppm (wt) each of sulfur and nitrogen less than about 0.5 wt. % unsaturates, and about 0.0025 to less than 0.3 wt. % linear C12-C24 primary alcohol oxygenates as oxygen on a water free basis.
  • 2. The material of claim 1 wherein the oxygen is present primarily as C12-C24 linear alcohols.
  • 3. The material of claim 2 characterized by a cetane number of at least 70.
  • 4. A process for producing a distillate fuel heavier than gasoline comprising:(a) separating the wax-containing product of a Fischer-Tropsch process into a heavier fraction containing 700° F.+ hydrocarbons and a lighter fraction containing 700° F.− hydrocarbons; (b) further separating the lighter fraction into at least two other fractions, (i) one of which contains primary C12+ alcohols; and (ii) one of which does not contain said alcohols; (c) hydroisomerizing at least a portion of the heavier fraction of step (a) and at least a portion of the (b)(ii) fraction at hydroisomerization conditions and recovering a 700° F.− fraction; and (d) blending at least a portion of the fraction of (b)(i) with at least a portion of the 700° F.− fractions of step (c) and recovering a product boiling in the range of 250-700° F. which contains 0.0025 to 0.3 wt. % C12-C24 primary linear alcohol oxygenate, as oxygen on a water free basis.
  • 5. The product of claim 4.
  • 6. The process of claim 4 wherein the Tropsch process is characterized by non-shifting conditions.
  • 7. The process of claim 4 characterized in that the fraction b (ii) is 500° F.−.
  • 8. The process of claim 4 characterized in that the fraction b (ii) is 600° F.−.
  • 9. A blended fuel, useful as a diesel fuel, comprising;(a) a 250-700° F. of distillate fraction derived from the Fischer-Tropsch process which contains; at least 95 wt. % paraffins a cetane number of at least 60 ≦50 ppm (wt) each of sulfur and nitrogen less than about 0.5 wt. % unsaturates, and about 0.0025 to less than 0.3 wt. % linear C12-C24 primary alcohol oxygenates as oxygen on a water free basis, blended with (b) a hydrocarbon faction.
  • 10. A blended fuel according to claim 9 wherein said Fischer-Tropsch process is a non-shifting Fischer-Tropsch catalyst process.
  • 11. A blended fuel according to claim 10 wherein said Fischer-Tropsch catalyst comprises cobalt.
  • 12. A blended fuel according to claim 9 wherein said hydrocarbon fraction contains feeds of about the same boiling range as the 250-700° F. distillate fraction derived from the Fischer-Tropsch process.
  • 13. A blended fuel according to claim 9 or 12 wherein hydrocarbon is selected from the group consisting of raw distillates, raw gas oils, hydrogenated catalytic distillates, hydrogenated catalytic gas oils, thermally cracked distillates, and thermally cracked oils.
  • 14. A distillate fraction adding to claim 1 containing less than or equal to 15 ppm (wt) each of sulfur and nitrogen, and less than about 0.1 wt % unsaturates.
  • 15. A distillate fraction according to claim 14 containing less than or equal to 10 ppm (wt) each of sulfur and nitrogen.
  • 16. A heavier than gasoline distillate fraction useful as a fuel composition or a blending component therefor, comprising a C5-500° F. boiling range fraction recovered from a Fischer-Tropsch hydrocarbon synthesis reactor wherein said fraction contains less than or equal to 50 ppm (wt) sulfur; less than or equal to 50 ppm (wt) nitrogen; virtually no aromatics; less than or equal to 0.5 wt. % olefins; and at least 0.001 wt. % oxygenate as oxygen as determined on a water free basis.
  • 17. The composition of claim 16 wherein said fuel or blending component contains less than 15 ppm (wt) dioxygenates.
  • 18. The composition of claim 16 wherein said distillate fraction boils in the range of C5-600° F.
  • 19. A blended fuel, useful as a diesel fuel comprising a 500°-700° F.+ boiling range fraction recovered from a Fischer-Tropsch hydrocarbon synthesis reactor blended with a hydroisomerized 700° F.+ Fischer-Tropsch derived reactor product wherein said blend boils in the range of 250°-700° F., and wherein at least a portion of said 700° F.+ Fischer-Tropsch derived reactor product is combined with a lighter C5-500° F. boiling range Fischer-Tropsch derived reactor product prior to hydroisomerization.
  • 20. The blended fuel of claim 19 wherein said lighter Fischer-Tropsch product boils in the range of C5-500° F.
  • 21. The blend of claim 19 wherein said 500-700° F. fraction contains about 0.001 to less than 0-3 wt % oxygen as determined on a water-free basis.
  • 22. The blend of claim 21 wherein said oxygen is present primarily as C12-C24 linear alcohols.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/544,345 filed Oct. 17, 1995 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,689,031 on Nov. 18, 1997.

US Referenced Citations (189)
Number Name Date Kind
2243760 Martin May 1941 A
2562980 Atwell Aug 1951 A
2668790 Good et al. Feb 1954 A
2668866 Good et al. Feb 1954 A
2756183 Knox, Jr. Jul 1956 A
2779713 Cole et al. Jan 1957 A
2817693 Koome et al. Dec 1957 A
2838444 Teter et al. Jun 1958 A
2888501 Folkins et al. May 1959 A
2892003 Weisz Jun 1959 A
2906688 Farmer et al. Sep 1959 A
2914464 Burton et al. Nov 1959 A
2982802 Folkins et al. May 1961 A
2993938 Bloch et al. Jul 1961 A
3002827 Fenske Oct 1961 A
3052622 Johnson et al. Sep 1962 A
3078323 Kline et al. Feb 1963 A
3121696 Hoekstra Feb 1964 A
3123573 Carr Mar 1964 A
3125511 Tupman et al. Mar 1964 A
3147210 Hass et al. Sep 1964 A
3206525 MIchaels et al. Sep 1965 A
3253055 Goble et al. May 1966 A
3268436 Arey, Jr. et al. Aug 1966 A
3268439 Tupman et al. Aug 1966 A
3308052 Ireland et al. Mar 1967 A
3338843 Goble et al. Aug 1967 A
3340180 Beuther et al. Sep 1967 A
3365390 Egan et al. Jan 1968 A
3395981 Kischio Aug 1968 A
3404086 Plank et al. Oct 1968 A
3471399 O'Hara Oct 1969 A
3486993 Egan et al. Dec 1969 A
3487005 Egan et al. Dec 1969 A
3507776 Hann Apr 1970 A
3530061 Orkin et al. Sep 1970 A
3594307 Kirk, Jr. Jul 1971 A
3607729 Robinson et al. Sep 1971 A
3619408 Larson Nov 1971 A
3620960 Koziowski et al. Nov 1971 A
3629095 Divijak, Jr. Dec 1971 A
3630885 Egan Dec 1971 A
3658689 Steinmetz et al. Apr 1972 A
3660058 Feldman et al. May 1972 A
3668112 Parker Jun 1972 A
3668113 Burbidge Jun 1972 A
3674681 Lyon Jul 1972 A
3681232 Egan Aug 1972 A
3684695 Neel et al. Aug 1972 A
3692695 Suggitt et al. Sep 1972 A
3692697 Kravitz et al. Sep 1972 A
3709817 Suggitt et al. Jan 1973 A
3711399 Estes et al. Jan 1973 A
3717586 Suggitt et al. Feb 1973 A
3725302 Shimely Apr 1973 A
3761388 Bryson et al. Sep 1973 A
3767562 Sze et al. Oct 1973 A
3770618 Adams Nov 1973 A
3775291 Sze Nov 1973 A
3794580 Ladeur Feb 1974 A
3814682 Christman et al. Jun 1974 A
3830723 Ledeur et al. Aug 1974 A
3830728 Mounce Aug 1974 A
3840508 Ballard et al. Oct 1974 A
3840614 Kravitz et al. Oct 1974 A
3843509 Suto et al. Oct 1974 A
3843746 Krawiz et al. Oct 1974 A
3848018 Robson Nov 1974 A
3852186 Christman et al. Dec 1974 A
3852207 Stangeland et al. Dec 1974 A
3861005 Steinmetz et al. Jan 1975 A
3864425 Gardner Feb 1975 A
3870622 Ashton et al. Mar 1975 A
3876522 Campbell et al. Apr 1975 A
3887455 Hammer Jun 1975 A
3915843 Franck et al. Oct 1975 A
3963601 Hilfman Jun 1976 A
3976560 Erickson Aug 1976 A
3977961 Hamner Aug 1976 A
3977962 Arey, Jr. et al. Aug 1976 A
3979279 Yan Sep 1976 A
4014821 Hamner Mar 1977 A
4032304 Dorer, Jr. et al. Jun 1977 A
4032474 Goudriaan et al. Jun 1977 A
4041095 Kuo Aug 1977 A
4051021 Hamner Sep 1977 A
4059648 Derr et al. Nov 1977 A
4067797 Chen Jan 1978 A
4073718 Hamner Feb 1978 A
4087349 Baird, Jr. May 1978 A
4125566 Dinh Nov 1978 A
4139494 Itoh et al. Feb 1979 A
4162962 Stangeland Jul 1979 A
4186078 Itoh et al. Jan 1980 A
4212771 Hamner Jul 1980 A
4263127 Rausch et al. Apr 1981 A
4304871 Brennan et al. Dec 1981 A
4342641 Reif et al. Aug 1982 A
4378973 Sweeney Apr 1983 A
4390414 Cody Jun 1983 A
4394251 Miller Jul 1983 A
4427534 Brunn et al. Jan 1984 A
4427791 Miale Jan 1984 A
4428819 Shu et al. Jan 1984 A
4444895 Fung et al. Apr 1984 A
4451572 Cody May 1984 A
4472529 Johnson et al. Sep 1984 A
4477586 McDaniel Oct 1984 A
4518395 Petronella May 1985 A
4527995 Itow et al. Jul 1985 A
4529526 Inoue et al. Jul 1985 A
4539014 Sweeney Sep 1985 A
4568663 Mauldin Feb 1986 A
4579986 Sie Apr 1986 A
4588701 Chiang May 1986 A
4594172 Sie Jun 1986 A
4599162 Yen Jul 1986 A
4608151 Miller Aug 1986 A
4618412 Hudson et al. Oct 1986 A
4627908 Miller Dec 1986 A
4645585 White Feb 1987 A
4673487 Miller Jun 1987 A
4684756 Derr, Jr. et al. Aug 1987 A
4695365 Ackelson Sep 1987 A
4755280 Hudson et al. Jul 1988 A
4764266 Chen et al. Aug 1988 A
4804802 Evans et al. Feb 1989 A
4832819 Hamner May 1989 A
4851109 Chen et al. Jul 1989 A
4855530 LaPierre et al. Aug 1989 A
4875992 Hamner Oct 1989 A
4900707 Cody et al. Feb 1990 A
4906599 Cody et al. Mar 1990 A
4911821 Katzer et al. Mar 1990 A
4919786 Hamner Apr 1990 A
4919788 Chen et al. Apr 1990 A
4923841 Hamner May 1990 A
4929795 Cody et al. May 1990 A
4937399 Wachter et al. Jun 1990 A
4943672 Hamner et al. Jul 1990 A
4959337 Cody et al. Sep 1990 A
4960504 Pellet Oct 1990 A
4962269 LaPierre et al. Oct 1990 A
4982031 Chen Jan 1991 A
4990713 Le et al. Feb 1991 A
4992159 Cody et al. Feb 1991 A
4992406 Mauldin Feb 1991 A
5037528 Garwood et al. Aug 1991 A
5059299 Cody et al. Oct 1991 A
5059741 Foley Oct 1991 A
5110445 Chen et al. May 1992 A
5156114 Gunnerman Oct 1992 A
5157187 Le et al. Oct 1992 A
5158671 Cody et al. Oct 1992 A
5183556 Reilly et al. Feb 1993 A
5187138 Davis Feb 1993 A
5281347 Igarashi et al. Jan 1994 A
5282958 Santilli et al. Feb 1994 A
5292988 Wu Mar 1994 A
5292989 Davis Mar 1994 A
5302279 Degnan et al. Apr 1994 A
5306860 Bigeard et al. Apr 1994 A
5308365 Kesling May 1994 A
5324335 Benham Jun 1994 A
5345019 Bigeard et al. Sep 1994 A
5348982 Herbolzheimer et al. Sep 1994 A
5362378 Borghard et al. Nov 1994 A
5370788 Dai et al. Dec 1994 A
5378249 Morrison Jan 1995 A
5378348 Davis et al. Jan 1995 A
5378351 Guichard et al. Jan 1995 A
5385588 Brennan Jan 1995 A
5479775 Kraemer et al. Jan 1996 A
5500449 Benham et al. Mar 1996 A
5504118 Benham et al. Apr 1996 A
5506272 Benham et al. Apr 1996 A
5522983 Cash et al. Jun 1996 A
5538522 Ahmed Jul 1996 A
5543437 Benham et al. Aug 1996 A
5545674 Behrmann et al. Aug 1996 A
5689031 Berlowitz et al. Nov 1997 A
5766274 Wittenbrink et al. Jun 1998 A
5783618 Danner Jul 1998 A
5807413 Wittenbrink et al. Sep 1998 A
6056793 Suppes May 2000 A
6162956 Berlowitz et al. Dec 2000 A
6274029 Wittenbrink et al. Aug 2001 B1
6296757 Wittenbrink et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309432 Wittenbrink et al. Oct 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (71)
Number Date Country
275062 Jul 1964 AU
539698 Apr 1957 CA
700237 Dec 1964 CA
954058 Sep 1974 CA
30309989 Apr 1962 DE
2251156 Apr 1973 DE
3030998 Apr 1982 DE
0566348 Oct 1983 EP
0153782 Sep 1985 EP
0227218 Jul 1987 EP
0266898 May 1988 EP
0261992 Sep 1988 EP
0323092 Dec 1988 EP
0324301 Jun 1989 EP
0418860 Mar 1991 EP
0374461 May 1992 EP
0515256 Nov 1992 EP
0532117 Mar 1993 EP
0532118 Mar 1993 EP
0542528 May 1993 EP
0555006 Aug 1993 EP
0566348 Oct 1993 EP
0587245 Mar 1994 EP
0587246 Mar 1994 EP
0634472 Jan 1995 EP
0460957 Aug 1995 EP
0668342 Aug 1995 EP
0753563 Jan 1997 EP
0753563 Jan 1997 EP
0569228 Jun 1998 EP
732964 Nov 1932 FR
859686 Aug 1939 FR
2137490 Apr 1972 FR
2650289 Feb 1991 FR
728543 Apr 1955 GB
823010 Nov 1959 GB
848198 Sep 1960 GB
951997 Mar 1964 GB
953188 Mar 1964 GB
953189 Mar 1964 GB
1065205 Apr 1967 GB
1306646 Feb 1973 GB
1342499 Jan 1974 GB
1342500 Jan 1974 GB
1381004 Jan 1975 GB
1440230 Jun 1976 GB
1460476 Jan 1977 GB
1493828 Nov 1977 GB
1499570 Feb 1978 GB
49035323 Apr 1974 JP
2302561 Dec 1990 JP
6200262 Jul 1991 JP
3 231990 Oct 1991 JP
7310096 May 1994 JP
9703750 Feb 1992 WO
01769 Jun 1992 WO
9214804 Sep 1992 WO
9417160 Aug 1994 WO
9420593 Sep 1994 WO
94 28095 Dec 1994 WO
9502595 Jan 1995 WO
9200260 Feb 1995 WO
9503377 Feb 1995 WO
9506695 Mar 1995 WO
9527021 Oct 1995 WO
96023855 Aug 1996 WO
96 26396 Sep 1996 WO
97004044 Feb 1997 WO
9714768 Apr 1997 WO
9714769 Apr 1997 WO
97021787 Jun 1997 WO
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/544345 Oct 1995 US
Child 08/971254 US