It is known that polyisoprenes having a high cis-1,4 linkage content may be prepared using catalytic systems based on:
For example, the document “Report of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., volume 234, No. 5, 1977 (Y. B. Monakov, Y. R. Bieshev, A. A. Berg, S. R. Rafikov)” shows that isoprene may be polymerized at a temperature of between 20° C. and 50° C. using a catalytic system comprising:
Mention may also be made of the document “Proceedings of China—U.S. Bilateral Symposium on Polymer Chemistry and Physics, Science Press, pp. 382–398, 1981 (O. Jun, W. Fosong, S. Zhiquan)”. This document teaches the use of a bis(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid salt of neodymium, in association with triethylaluminium or triisobutylaluminium, and an alkylaluminium halide of the formula Al2(C2H5)3Cl3. The polyisoprenes which are obtained by means of such a catalytic system have a cis-1,4 linkage content which varies from 94.2% to 94.7% (see Tables 4 and 6, pp. 386 and 387).
This document also mentions the use of catalytic systems based on:
In the majority of cases, the microstructure of the polyisoprene is determined by the technique of medium-wave infrared radiation analysis (abbreviated to MIR) in accordance with the method developed by Ciampelli et al (F. Ciampelli, D. Moreno, M. Cambini, Makromol. Chem., 1963, 61, 250–253). It will be noted that this method, which is based solely on calculations made in the infrared range, does not always provide results of satisfactory accuracy when used in isolation.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,859,156 describes a process for the preparation of polyisoprenes by means of a catalytic system based on titanium tetrachloride, an organoaluminium and an ether. The maximum cis-1,4 linkage content of the polyisoprenes obtained, measured by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (13C-NMR), was 98.0% (see example 2, column 27, the content of trans-1,4 and 3,4 linkages then being 1.0% each).
The object of the present invention is to provide novel synthetic polyisoprenes and a process for their preparation, said polyisoprenes having a cis-1,4 linkage content which are distinctly greater than those obtained to date.
The present invention is based on the unexpected discovery that a catalytic system of the “preformed” type based on at least:
The phrase “based on” used to define the constituents of the catalytic system is taken to mean the mixture and/or reaction product of these constituents. Also, the phrase “a rare earth metal” is intended to mean “one or more rare earth metals.”
This catalytic system according to the invention makes it possible to obtain polyisoprenes having a cis-1,4 linkage content, measured by one or the other of these techniques, of between 99.0% and 99.6%, including 99.6%.
The polymerization operations can be carried out in the presence or absence of an inert hydrocarbon solvent.
Advantageously, at polymerization temperatures of from −55° C. to −20° C., the catalytic system makes it possible to obtain polyisoprenes having a cis-1,4 linkage content, measured by one and/or the other of the aforementioned techniques, of equal to or greater than 99.3%, preferably from 99.3% to 99.6%.
Even more advantageously, at polymerization temperatures of from −55° C. to −40° C., the catalytic system makes it possible to obtain polyisoprenes having a cis-1,4 linkage content, measured by one and/or the other of the aforementioned techniques, are equal to or greater than 99.5%, preferably equal to 99.6%.
It will be noted that the cis-1,4 linkage content values, which are very close to the value of 100%, that characterizes natural rubber, have never really been achieved to date. The range of cis-1,4 linkage content, measured in accordance with the present invention takes into account measurements established by means of either medium-wave infrared radiation analysis after calibration of the polyisoprene sample, which is effected within the scope of 13C-NMR analysis, or 13C-NMR analysis. The measurement obtained by one of these techniques can be confirmed by that of the other (disregarding the inaccuracy of measurement of +/−0.1%, which is inherent in each of these two techniques). The accuracy of these cis-1,4 linkage content values is thus significantly increased, relative to those of the prior art.
In particular, 13C NMR analysis showed the total absence of 1,2 linkages and trans-1,4 linkages in the polyisoprene prepared according to the invention.
Furthermore, the particularly high cis-1,4 linkage content obtained for the polyisoprenes according to the invention is independent of the quantity of catalytic system used. Moreover, the polyisoprenes thus obtained have a high viscosity.
The catalytic systems according to the invention are characterized by an “alkylating agent:rare earth salt” molar ratio of between 1 and 5, which is extremely low compared with the molar ratios equal to or greater than 20 which have heretofore been used to polymerize isoprene.
1,3-butadiene may be mentioned as a preferred conjugated diene monomer used for “preforming” the catalytic system according to the invention.
Other conjugated dienes that may be used are 2-methyl-1,3-butadiene (or isoprene), 2,3-di(C1 to C5 alkyl)-1,3-butadienes such as, for instance, 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene, 2,3-diethyl-1,3-butadiene, 2-methyl-3-ethyl-1,3-butadiene, 2-methyl-3-isopropyl-1,3-butadiene, phenyl-1,3-butadiene, 1,3-pentadiene, 2,4-hexadiene, or any other conjugated diene having between 4 and 8 carbon atoms.
It will be noted that the “monomer:rare earth salt” molar ration may have a value of from 25 to 50.
According to another characteristic of the invention, said rare earth salt consists of a non-hygroscopic powder having a slight tendency to agglomerate at ambient temperature.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the inert hydrocarbon solvent in which said rare earth salt is in suspension is a low molecular weight aliphatic or alicyclic solvent, such as cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane, n-heptane, or a mixture of these solvents.
According to another embodiment of the invention, the solvent used to suspend the rare earth salt is a mixture of a high molecular weight aliphatic solvent comprising a paraffinic oil, for example petrolatum oil, and of low molecular weight, a solvent such as those mentioned above (for example methylcyclohexane).
This suspension is prepared by dispersive grinding of the rare earth salt in this paraffinic oil, so as to obtain a very fine and homogenous suspension of said salt.
According to another characteristic of the invention, said catalytic system comprises the rare earth metal in a concentration equal or substantially equal to 0.02 mol/l.
According to a preferred example of embodiment of the invention, a tris[bis(2-ethylhexyl)phosphate] salt of the rare earth metal or metals is used as salt.
Even more preferably, the rare earth salt is neodymium tris[bis(2-ethylhexyl)phosphate].
Alkylating agents that can be used in the catalytic system according to the invention, include alkylaluminiums such as:
It will be noted that the alkylating agent is preferably diisobutylaluminium hydride (hereinafter “DiBAH”).
Halogen donors that can be used in the catalytic system according to the invention included alkylaluminium halides, preferably diethylaluminium chloride (hereinafter “DEAC”).
The “halogen donor:rare earth salt” molar ratio may have a value of from 2.6 to 3.
According to the invention, the process for the preparation of said catalytic system comprises:
The aforementioned characteristics of the present invention, as well as others, will be better understood on reading the following description of several examples of embodiment of the invention, which are given by way of illustration and not of limitation.
A plurality of tests were carried out for synthesis of this salt. The same synthesis method, which is described in detail below, was used for each of these tests.
96 g of Nd2O3 (sold by RHODIA), which has been determined by complexation analysis to have an Nd content of 85.3% (theoretical value 85.7%), thereby amounting to 0.57 mol of Nd, was weighed out into a “tall” form 600 ml beaker.
80 ml of demineralized water were added. Under a fume hood, 150 ml of 36 wt. % concentrated HCl (d=1.18), namely 1.75 mol of HCl (molar ratio HCl:Nd=1.75:0.57=3.07), were slowly added at ambient temperature while the mixture was stirred with a magnetic stirrer.
The reaction Nd2O3+6 HCl+9 H2O→2 NdCl3, 6H2O is highly exothermic.
Once all the hydrochloric acid has been added, the solution was raised to boiling while being stirred with a magnetic stirrer. The aqueous NdCl3 solution was clear and mauve in color. No insoluble product (Nd2O3) remained.
This solution was then evaporated until a volume of 130 ml remained in the beaker. The NdCl3, 6H2O was highly concentrated (it crystallized at ambient temperature).
The concentrated solution of NdCl3 was then poured into a 10 liter drum containing 4500 ml of demineralized water at ambient temperature, while the mixture was stirred (using a motor with an anchor agitator).
The pH of the solution, measured at 25° C., was close to 4.
1500 ml of technical grade acetone were then added to the solution. No insoluble product remained and the resultant solution was pink in color.
68 g, or 1.70 mol, of NaOH flakes were dissolved in a 5 liter beaker containing 1500 ml of demineralized water. 554 g of an organic phosphoric acid (bis(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid, listed in the “Aldrich” catalogue under number 23,782-5), namely 1.72 mol of this acid, were dissolved in another 3 liter beaker containing 500 ml of acetone. The molar ratio NaOH:organic phosphoric acid was 1.70:1.72 or 0.99.
At ambient temperature and while stirring the mixture by hand with a glass stirrer, the solution of said organic phosphoric acid was poured into the NaOH solution. The reaction is as follows:
[RO]2P(O)OH+NaOH→[RO]2P(O)ONa+H2O.
The reaction is slightly exothermic and a homogeneous solution of a yellowish color was obtained. The pH of the solution, measured at 25° C., was close to 7.
At ambient temperature and while the mixture was being vigorously stirred (motor with anchor agitator), the organic Na phosphate salt obtained in paragraph b) above was poured into the aqueous solution of NdCl3,6H2O obtained in paragraph a) above.
A very fine white precipitate formed immediately. Stirring of the resultant mixture was continued for 30 minutes once all the organic Na phosphate had been added (in a molar ratio (RO)2P(O)ONa:NdCl3=1.70:0.57=2.98). The reaction is as follows:
3[RO]2P(O)ONa+NdCl3,6H2O→Nd[OP(O)[OR]2]3+3NaCl+6H2O.
The resultant phosphated neodymium salt was recovered and washed in a centrifuge equipped with a “sock”.
The pH of the mother liquors was between 3 and 4 at 25° C. These mother liquors were colorless and clear.
The salt obtained was divided into two samples, then each sample was washed with an acetone/demineralized water mixture, performing the washing cycle described below three times in order to remove all the chlorides.
Each washing cycle was performed in a 10 liter plastic bucket initially containing 2 liters of acetone. Each sample was then homogenized with the acetone using an “Ultra-Turrax” homogenizer for approximately 1 minute in order to obtain a milky solution.
4 liters of demineralized water were then added to the bucket and the resultant mixture was homogenized for 3 minutes using the same homogenizer.
The resultant mixture was centrifuged and the phosphated neodymium salt was recovered in the “sock”.
The qualitative analytic test for chlorides was virtually negative for the final washing water (the reaction is as follows:
NaCl+AgNO3(HNO3 medium)→AgCl↓+NaNO3).
The neodymium salt washed in this manner is dried in an oven under a vacuum and with air-flow for approximately 80 hours.
The final yield for each of the synthesis tests performed was between 95% and 98%, depending upon the losses arising during washing. In each case, approximately 600 g of dry phosphated neodymium salt was obtained.
The mass contents of neodymium, determined by complexometry, were between 12.9% and 13.0% (for a theoretical content τ=[144.24/1108.50]×100=13.01%, where 144.24 g/mol=molar mass of the neodymium).
Each of these systems comprised a phosphated neodymium salt as synthesized in accordance with paragraph 1) above, which is in suspension in an inert low molecular weight hydrocarbon solvent (consisting of cyclohexane, hereinafter to “CH,” or methylcyclohexane, hereinafter “MCH”).
These catalytic systems were characterized by the following relative molar ratios, relative to the neodymium salt:
Nd salt:butadiene (“Bd”):DiBAH:DEAC=1:50:1.8 to 4:2.6 or 3.
First Stage:
In order to obtain these catalytic systems, 15.6 g of the neodymium salt, in powder form, was poured into a 1 liter reactor from which the impurities had been previously removed. This salt was then subjected to nitrogen bubbling from the bottom of the reactor, for a period of 15 min.
Second Stage:
90% (mass fraction) of the solvent mentioned in paragraph a) above was introduced into the reactor containing the neodymium salt.
When the solvent was cyclohexane, the duration of contact with the neodymium salt varied from 2 hours to 4 hours, and the temperature varied from 30° C. to 60° C. When the solvent was methylcyclohexane, the duration of contact with the neodymium salt was 30 min., and the temperature of contact was 30° C.
Third Stage:
Butadiene was then introduced into the reactor (in the salt:butadiene molar ratio of 1:50 mentioned in paragraph a) above), at a temperature of 30° C., for “preforming” each catalytic system.
Fourth Stage:
Diisobutylaluminium hydride (DiBAH) was then introduced into the reactor as alkylating agent for the neodymium salt in a concentration of approximately 1 M, together with a quantity of the solvent mentioned above in the second stage corresponding to a mass fraction of 5% of the entire solvent. The duration of the alkylation was 15 min. and the temperature of the alkylation reaction was 30° C.
Fifth Stage:
Diethylaluminium chloride (DEAC) was then introduced into the reactor as the halogen donor in a concentration of approximately 1 M, together with a quantity of the solvent mentioned above in the second stage corresponding to the remaining mass fraction of 5% of the entire solvent. The temperature of the reaction medium adjusted to 60° C.
Sixth Stage:
The resultant mixture was then “preferred” (or aged) by maintaining this temperature of 60° C. for a period of 2 hours to 4 hours.
Seventh Stage:
In this manner, approximately 700 ml of a solution of catalytic system was obtained. The reactor was emptied and this solution was transferred to a 750 ml “Steinie” bottle, which had been previously washed, dried and subjected to nitrogen bubbling.
Finally the catalytic solution was stored under a nitrogen atmosphere in a freezer, at a temperature of −15° C.
Table I provides a summary of the catalytic systems that were prepared.
A 250 ml “Steinie” bottle was used as the polymerization reactor. Each polymerization reaction was carried out either under static conditions in a freezer (bottle placed in a bath of glycol), or dynamically (by subjecting the bottle to agitation in a tank of glycol).
A steam-cracked C5 naphtha fraction was used, with the aim of extracting isoprene having a purity close to 100% therefrom. To this end, conventional laboratory purification was carried out, comprising:
The mass fraction of isoprene extracted from this C5 fraction was determined to be 99.2% by gas phase chromatography (“GPC”).
Each isoprene polymerization reaction (10 g per bottle) was carried out in cyclohexane at −15° C., under an inert nitrogen atmosphere, with a solvent:monomer mass ratio (S:M) of 9.
In the various examples of polymerization, the neodymium catalyst base was varied from 150 μmol to 500 μmol per 100 g of monomer (quantity of neodymium expressed in μMcm hereafter). The tightness of the bottle was ensured by a “septum/open-top seal” assembly which permitted the injection of the catalytic system by means of a syringe.
At the end of polymerization, while adding 100 ml of additional solvent to fluidify the medium, acetylacetone was added (1 ml of a solution of a concentration of 1M in cyclohexane) to stop the reaction and N-1,3-dimethylbutyl-N′-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (abbreviated to 6PPD) as a protection agent (in a volume of 2 ml at a concentration of 10 g/l in cyclohexane, or a mass of 0.02 g).
The polyisoprene was extracted from each polymer solution by steam stripping for 30 minutes, in the presence of calcium tamolate (using 2 ml of tamol and 50 ml of CaCl2 at 30 g/l). Then each extracted solution was dried for approximately 18 hours in an oven at 50° C. under a vacuum (at a pressure of 200 mm Hg), under a gentle stream of nitrogen for approximately 72 hours.
The conversion rate of isoprene into polyisoprene as a function of the reaction time was measured to describe the polymerization kinetics.
The inherent viscosity ηinh at 0.1 g/dl in toluene and the Mooney viscosity ML(1+4) (measured in accordance with ASTM Standard D-1646) characterize the macrostructure of each polyisoprene obtained.
To determine the microstructure of the polyisoprenes, 13C-NMR (absolute method of great accuracy) and MIR (medium-wave infrared) analyses were used, as specified in “Measurements and Tests” below. These techniques have made it possible to establish, to within an inaccuracy of 0.1%, the cis-1,4 and 3,4 linkage content (13C-NMR analysis having demonstrated the absence of trans-1,4 or 1,2 linkages).
The MIR technique provided great accuracy in determining the content of 3,4 units, owing to the fact that it used the samples of polyisoprene having previously been calibrated for the 13C-NMR analysis.
Table II sets forth the operating conditions followed for each polymerization and the macrostructural and microstructural characteristics of each polyisoprene obtained.
13C-NMR
Table II shows that at a polymerization temperature of −15° C., catalytic system 1 according to the invention made it possible to obtain polyisoprenes having a content of cis in a range from 99.0% to 99.2% with satisfactory activity, whatever the quantity of catalytic base used and whatever the conversion rate achieved for a given quantity of catalytic base.
The results also show that stirring had no influence on the macrostructure of the polyisoprenes obtained. Although the reaction rates were relatively low, the activity of catalytic system 1 was not adversely affected and made it possible to achieve 100% conversion, even for final polyisoprenes having a high viscosity.
A 750 ml “Steinie” bottle was used as the polymerization reactor, and all the polymerization reactions of the isoprene were implemented statically in a freezer at −25° C. (bottle in a bath of glycol).
The quality of the isoprene was as described in paragraph 1) above. The conversion rate was 100% in all cases (for at least 64 hours of reaction time).
Each polymerization was effected as indicated in paragraph 1), except that a plurality of polymerization solvents and solvent:isoprene monomer (S:M) mass ratios were tested, for the tests carried out.
Because of the viscosity of the polyisoprene solutions obtained, solvent was added thereto, before adding the stoppage and protection agents mentioned in paragraph 1).
The polyisoprene was then extracted from each polyisoprene solution thus “fluidified”, then each extracted solution was dried, all in the manner described in paragraph 1).
Table III shows the results obtained (refer to paragraph 1) above for the measurement conditions).
13C-NMR
These results show that, at a temperature kept at −25° C., catalytic systems 2 to 5 according to the invention made it possible to obtain polyisoprenes having cis-1,4 linkage contents which are on average equal to 99.4% with satisfactory activity.
Insofar as the polymerization temperature remained constant, the presence or absence of solvent, the nature of this solvent (aliphatic or alicyclic) and the quantity of solvent had no effect on cis-1,4 linkage content.
As far as the catalytic systems used are concerned, it will be noted that the cis-1,4 linkage content was independent of the molar ratios DiBAH/Nd and DEAC/Nd.
As far as the macrostructure characteristics of the polyisoprenes obtained are concerned (measurements taken by means of the SEC technique, see “Measurements and Tests” below), the polyisoprene obtained for test G (catalytic system 2) with a quantity of Nd of 500 μMcm had:
As for the polyisoprene obtained for test K (catalytic system 3), it had:
The same polymerization conditions as those set forth in paragraph 2) above were used, except that the polymerization temperature was kept at −45° C. (instead of −25° C.).
Table IV shows the results obtained (reference will be made to paragraph 1) above for the measurement conditions).
These results show that catalytic system 3 according to the invention had a sufficient activity to polymerize isoprene at a temperature kept at −45° C., despite the reduced reaction rate which it provided at this very low temperature.
It will be noted that the polyisoprenes thus obtained each have a cis-1,4 linkage content of 99.6%, which is an extremely high amount.
The same polymerization conditions as those set forth in paragraph 1) above (250 ml “Steinie” bottle with 10 g isoprene per bottle) were used, except that the polymerization temperature was kept at 0° C. and that the polymerization was implemented with stirring in a tank of glycol.
Table V shows the results obtained (reference will be made to paragraph 1) for the measurement conditions).
13C-NMR
These results show that at a temperature of 0° C., catalytic systems 5 and 6 according to the invention made it possible to obtain polyisoprenes having a cis-1,4 linkage content within a range from 99.0% to 99.1% with satisfactory activity.
For a ratio of polymerization solvent:monomer (cyclohexane:isoprene) equal to 9 (namely 10% concentration), it will be noted that the polyisoprenes obtained with catalytic system 5 according to the invention had, after 18 hours (100% conversion), a high, reproducible Mooney viscosity of approximately 85.
As far as the macrostructure characteristics of the polyisoprenes obtained are concerned (measurements taken by means of the SEC technique, see “Measurements and Tests” below), the polyisoprene obtained for test N (catalytic system 6) had:
2 g of polyisoprene were extracted in refluxing acetone for 8 hours. The extracted polyisoprene was then dried at ambient temperature under a vacuum for 24 hours. This dried polyisoprene was then redissolved in chloroform. The polyisoprene solution was filtered and the solvent removed in a rotary evaporator for 4 hours (bath temperature is 40° C.).
For the purposes of the analysis, approximately 600 mg the of polyisoprene prepared in this manner were solubilized in CDCl3 (2 ml) directly in a 13C NMR tube.
Peaks were identified following:
Quang Tho Pham, R. Petiaud, H. Waton, M. F. Llauro Darricades, “Proton and NMR Spectra of Polymers”, 1991, Penton Press.
The polyisoprene as prepared in paragraph 1) above was used for this infrared analysis, while for NMR the sample was extracted with acetone and then dried in an oven.
A polyisoprene solution of exactly 10 g/l in CCl4 was analyzed using a KBr cell with a pathlength of 0.2 mm.
Spectrophotometer sold under the name “BRUKER IFS88”.
Spectrum Processing:
transfer to microcomputer;
Spectral studies and the contents of the following documents made it possible to determine the characteristic bands of the various linkage modes:
Y. Tanaka, Y. Takeuchi, M. Kobayashi, H. Tadokoro, Journal of Polymer Science, Part A-2, 1971, 9(1), 43–57.
J. P. Kistel, G. Friedman, B. Kaempf, Bulletin de la Société Chimique de France, 1967, no. 12.
F. Asssioma, J. Marchal, C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, Ser C, 1968, 266(22), 1563–6 and Ser D, 1968, 266(6), 369–72.
T. F. Banigan, A. J. Verbiscar, T. A. Oda, Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 1982, 55(2), 407–15.
The 3–4 conformation exhibited two characteristic bands:
a high intensity band at 880 cm−1 corresponding to the out-of-plane deformation vibrations (δ C—H) of the terminal hydrogens of the vinyl group (═CH2) and
a band at 3070 cm−1 corresponding to the ν C—H stretching of this same group (═CH2).
The cis-1,4 conformation had a characteristic band around 3030 cm−. This band corresponds to the ν C—H stretching vibrations of the ═CH group.
The band corresponding to the symmetrical deformation vibrations of the methyl groups (δ CH3) was a complex band incorporating all three conformations. Absorption corresponding to the δ CH3 of the trans-1,4 conformation was at its maximum around 1385 cm−1; this was a shoulder of the band.
The cis-3,4 and 1,4 bands were integrated by the tangential area method.
The 1,4-trans absorption maximum was located on the shoulder of the intense δ CH3 band. The most suitable method in this case was to measure the height of the band using the tangent of the δ CH3 band as the baseline.
Statement of Beer-Lambert law:
Do(ν or δ)=ε(ν or δ) e c
where:
Commercial polyisoprenes (sold as “IR305”, “NATSYN 2200” and “SKI-3S”), a polyisoprene synthesized in the laboratory (MC78) and natural rubber (NR) were used as standards. Compared at isoconcentration (solutions), the law may thus be written:
Dx=KX
where:
Calibration curves Dx=f(X) may thus be plotted for each of the structural units.
SEC (size exclusion chromatography) makes it possible physically to separate macromolecules by their size in the swollen state in columns filled with a porous stationary phase. The macromolecules are separated by their hydrodynamic volume, the bulkiest being eluted first.
Although not an absolute method, SEC does enable an assessment to be made of the molecular weight distribution of a polymer. On the basis of commercially available standards, the various number-average (Mn) and weight-average (Mw) molecular weights may be determined and the polydispersity index calculated (IP=Mw/Mn).
The polymer sample was not subjected to any particular treatment prior to analysis, but is simply solubilized in tetrahydrofuran at a concentration of approximately 1 g/l.
The apparatus used was a “WATERS model 150C” chromatograph. The elution solvent is tetrahydrofuran, the flow rate 0.7 ml/min, the temperature of the system 35° C. and the duration of analysis 90 min. A set of four columns was used in series, the columns having the commercial names “SHODEX KS807”, “WATERS type STYRAGEL HMW7” and two “WATERS STYRAGEL MHW6E”.
The volume of polymer sample solution injected was 100 μl. The detector is a “WATERS model RI32X” differential refractometer and the chromatographic data processing software was “WATERS MILLENNIUM” (version 3.00).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
00 14677 | Nov 2000 | FR | national |
The present application is a continuation of PCT/EP01/12489, filed on Oct. 29, 2001, now WO 02/38635 (published in French). The present invention relates to synthetic polyisoprenes having a high cis-1,4 linkage content and a process for their preparation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3114743 | Horne, Jr. | Dec 1963 | A |
3794604 | Throckmorton et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3864278 | La Heij et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4128708 | Liakumovich et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
5096970 | Hattori et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5859156 | Calderon et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6130299 | Sone et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6255416 | Sone et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0304088 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0846707 | Jun 1998 | EP |
6023406 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040019171 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP01/12489 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 10437330 | US |