1. Field of the Invention
The present invention discloses a method and composition for the treatment of bacterial infections by the parenteral introduction of a lysing enzyme blended with an appropriate carrier into a patient. The injection can be done intramuscularly, subcutaneously, or intravenously.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In the past, antibiotics have been used to treat various infections. The work of Selman Waksman in the introduction and production of Streptomycetes, and Dr. Fleming's discovery of penicillin, as well as the work of numerous others in the field of antibiotics, are well known. Over the years, there have been additions and chemical modifications to the “basic” antibiotics in attempts to make them more powerful, or to treat people allergic to these antibiotics.
Others have found new uses for these antibiotics. U.S. Pat. No. 5,260,292 (Robinson et al.) discloses the topical treatment of acne with aminopenicillins. The method and composition for topically treating acne and acneiform dermal disorders includes applying an amount of an antibiotic, effective for treating acne and acneiform dermal disorders, selected from the group consisting of ampicillin, amoxicillin, other aminopenicillins, and cephalosporins, and derivatives and analogs thereof. U.S. Pat. No. 5,409,917 (Robinson et al.) discloses the topical treatment of acne with cephalosporins.
However, as more antibiotics have been prescribed or used at an ever increasing rate for a variety of illnesses, increasing numbers of bacteria have developed a resistance to antibiotics. Larger doses of stronger antibiotics are now being used to treat ever more resistant strains of bacteria. Consequently, multiple antibiotic resistant bacteria have been developed. The use of more antibiotics and the number of bacteria showing resistance has led to increases in the amount of time that the antibiotics need to be used. Broad, non-specific antibiotics, some of which have detrimental effects on the patient, are now being used more frequently. Additionally, the number of people showing allergic reactions to antibiotics appears to be increasing.
Consequently, other efforts have been sought to first identify and then kill bacteria.
Attempts have been made to treat bacterial diseases with by the use of bacteriophages. U.S. Pat. No. 5,688,501 (Merril, et al.) discloses a method for treating an infectious bacterial disease with lytic or non-lytic bacteriophages that are specific for particular bacteria.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,957,686 (Norris) discloses a procedure of improved dental hygiene which comprises introducing into the mouth bacteriophages parasitic to bacteria which possess the property of readily adhering to the salivary pellicle.
It is to be noted that the direct introduction of bacteriophages into an animal to prevent or fight diseases has certain drawbacks. Specifically, the bacteria must be in the right growth phase for the phage to attach. Both the bacteria and the phage have to be in the correct and synchronized growth cycles. Additionally, there must be the right number of phages to attach to the bacteria; if there are too many or too few phages, there will either be no attachment or no production of the lysing enzyme. The phage must also be active enough. The phages are also inhibited by many things including bacterial debris from the organism the phages are going to attack. Further complicating the direct use of bacteriophage is the possibility of immunological reactions, rendering the phage non-functional.
Consequently, others have explored the use of other safer and more effective means to treat and prevent bacterial infections.
One bacteria for which a more effective treatment has been extensively explored is Streptococcus. The genus Streptococcus is comprised of a wide variety of both pathogenic and commensal gram-positive bacteria which are found to inhabit a wide range of hosts, including humans, horses, pigs, and cows. Within the host, streptococci are often found to colonize the mucosa surfaces of the mouth, nares and pharynx. However, in certain circumstances, they may also inhabit the skin, heart or muscle tissue.
Pathogenic streptococci of man include S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, and S. faecalis. While Group A streptococci may be present in the throat or on the skin and cause no symptoms of disease, they may also cause infections that range from mild to severe, and even life-threatening. Among the pathogenic hemolytic streptococci, S. pyogenes, or group A streptococci have been implicated as the etiologic agent of acute pharyngitis (“strep throat”), impetigo, rheumatic fever, scarlet fever, glomerulonephritis, and invasive fasciitis. Necrotizing fasciitis (sometimes described by the media as “the flesh-eating bacteria”) is a destructive infection of muscle and fat tissue. Invasive group A streptococcal infections occur when the bacteria get past the defenses of the person who is infected. About 10,000–15,000 cases of invasive GAS disease occur in the United States each year, resulting in over 2,000 deaths. CDC estimates that 500 to 1,500 cases of necrotizing fasciitis and 2,000 to 3,000 cases of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome occur each year in the United States. Approximately 20% of patients with necrotizing fasciitis die, and 60% of patients with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome die. About 10 to 15% of patients with other forms of invasive group A streptococcal disease die.
Additionally, Group C Streptococcus can cause cellulitis from skin breaks, although cellulitis is normally associated with Staphylococcus aureus. Cellulitis can result in death, particularly in older individuals or in individuals who are already weakened.
Reports have described the characteristics of an enzyme produced by the group C streptococcal organism after being infected with a particular bacteriophage identified as C1 (Maxted, W. R. “The Active Agent in Nascent Page Lywsis of Streptococci,” J. Gen Micro., vol 16, pp 585–595, 1957, Krause, R. M., “Studies on the Bacteriophages of Hemolytic Streptococci,” J. Exp. Med, vol. 108, pp 803–821, 1958) and Fischetti, (Fischetti, V. A., et al, “Purification and Physical Properties of Group C Streptococcal Phage Associated Lysin,” J. Exp. Med, Vol 133 pp. 1105–1117, 1971). The enzyme was given the name lysin and was found to specifically cleave the cell wall of group A, group C, and group E streptococci. These investigators provided information on the characteristics and activities of this enzyme with regard to lysing the group A streptococci and releasing the cell wall carbohydrate.
U.S. Pat. No. (application Ser. No. 08/962,523)(Fischetti, et. al.) and U.S. Pat. No. (application Ser. No. 09/257,026)(Fischetti et al.) disclose the use of an oral delivery mode, such as a candy, chewing gum, lozenge, troche, tablet, a powder, an aerosol, a liquid or a liquid spray, containing a lysin enzyme produced by group C streptococcal bacteria infected with a C1 bacteriophage for the prophylactic and therapeutic treatment of Streptococcal A throat infections, commonly known as strep throat.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,056,954 Fischetti and Loomis discloses a method for the prophylactic and therapeutic treatment of bacterial infections, which comprises the treatment of an individual with an effective amount of a lytic enzyme composition specific for the infecting bacteria, and a carrier for delivering said lytic enzyme. The methods disclosed included the topical, oral, and respiratory methods of delivering the enzyme. Another method disclosed in that application includes the use of suppositories. These methods and compositions can be used for the treatment of upper respiratory infections, skin infections, wounds and burns, vaginal infections, eye infections, intestinal disorders, and dental problems.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,056,955 (Fischetti and Loomis) discloses a method and composition for the topical treatment of streptococcal infections by the use of a lysin enzyme blended with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier suitable for topical application to dermal tissues. The method for the treatment of dermatological streptococcal infections comprises administering a composition comprising effective amount of a therapeutic agent, with the therapeutic agent comprising a lysin enzyme produced by group C streptococcal bacteria infected with a C1 bacteriophage. The therapeutic agent can be in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
The use of phage associated lytic enzymes produced by the infection of a bacteria with a bacteria specific phage has numerous advantages for the treatment of diseases. As the phage are targeted for specific bacteria, the lytic enzymes do not interfere with normal flora. Also, lytic phages primarily attack cell wall structures which are not affected by plasmid variation. The actions of the lytic enzymes are fast and do not depend on bacterial growth.
However, sometimes the bacterial infections, by the time they are treated, have developed into more serious illnesses. For example, dermatological infections such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcal pneumoniae can develop into cellulitis, which, unchecked, can lead to a degradation of the connective tissue, septicemia, and possibly death. Other bacterial infections can also evolve into deep tissue infections. Other infections by other bacteria, not necessarily dermatological by nature, can infect and localize in certain tissues of the body, making the infections difficult to treat.
The present invention discloses the use of a variety of bacterial phage associated lytic enzymes for the treatment of a wide variety of illnesses caused by bacterial infections. More specifically, the present invention discloses the PARENTERAL application of a bacterial lytic enzyme, wherein the phage associated lytic enzyme is administered intramuscularly, subdermally, subcutaneously, or intravenously to treat a bacterial infection.
It is another object of the invention to apply a phage associated lytic enzyme intravenously, to treat septicemia and general infections.
It is also an object of the invention to inject a phage associated lytic enzyme into the tissue of an organism to treat a deep tissue infection.
It is also an object of the invention to administer a phage associated lytic enzyme intravenously.
The invention (which incorporates U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,109 in its entirety by reference) uses an enzyme produced by the bacterial organism after being infected with a particular bacteriophage as a therapeutic treatment for those who have already become ill from the infection. The present invention is based upon the discovery that phage lytic enzymes specific for bacteria infected with a specific phage can effectively and efficiently break down the cell wall of the bacterium in question. At the same time, the semipurified enzyme is lacking in proteolytic enzymatic activity and therefore non-destructive to mammalian proteins and tissues when present during the digestion of the bacterial cell wall.
In one embodiment of the invention, the treatments of a variety of illnesses caused by Streptococcus fasciae, and Staphylococcus aureus are disclosed.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, lysostaphin, the enzyme which lyses Staphylococcus aureus, can be included in the therapeutic agent.
In a further embodiment of the invention, conventional antibiotics may be included in the therapeutic agent with the lytic enzyme, and with or without the presence of lysostaphin.
In another embodiment of the invention, more than one lytic enzyme may also be included in the therapeutic agent.
The therapeutic agent may be given parenterally, by means of an intramuscular, intradermal, or subcutaneous injection, or the agent may be given intravenously.
The method for treating systemic or tissue bacterial infections comprises parenterally treating the infection with a therapeutic agent comprising an effective amount of at least one lytic enzyme produced by a bacteria infected with a bacteriophage specific for the bacteria, and an appropriate carrier.
The composition may be used for the therapeutic treatment of Pseudomonas, Clostridium, Staphylococcus infections, among others. These and other bacteria can be infected with bacteriophage specific for said bacteria, whereupon a lytic enzyme is produced specific for the lysing of that bacteria. For example, the composition which may be used for the therapeutic treatment of a strep infection includes the lysin enzyme and a means of application. When group C Streptococci are infected with a C1 bacteriophage, a lysin enzyme is produced specific for the lysing of Streptococcus group A.
A number of different bacteria may be treated. Among the bacteria which most often infect deep tissues, and, more specifically connective tissues, are Group A Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Clostridium. More than one lytic enzyme may be introduced into the infected body at a time.
A number of different methods may be used to introduce the lytic enzyme(s). These methods include introducing the lytic enzyme intravenously, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, and subdermally.
In one preferred embodiment of the invention, a deep tissue infection may be treated by injecting into the infected tissue of the patient a therapeutic agent comprising the appropriate lytic enzyme(s) and a carrier for the enzyme. The carrier may be comprised of distilled water, a saline solution, albumin, a serum, or any combinations thereof. More specifically, solutions for infusion or injection may be prepared in a conventional manner, e.g. with the addition of preservatives such as p-hydroxybenzoates or stabilizers such as alkali metal salts of ethylene-diamine tetraacetic acid, which may then be transferred into fusion vessels, injection vials or ampules. Alternatively, the compound for injection may be lyophilized either with or without the other ingredients and be solubilized in a buffered solution or distilled water, as appropriate, at the time of use. Non-aqueous vehicles such as fixed oils and ethyl oleate are also useful herein.
In cases where intramuscular injection is the chosen mode of administration, an isotonic formulation is preferably used. Generally, additives for isotonicity can include sodium chloride, dextrose, mannitol, sorbitol and lactose. In some cases, isotonic solutions such as phosphate buffered saline are preferred. Stabilizers include gelatin and albumin. In some embodiments, a vasoconstriction agent is added to the formulation. The pharmaceutical preparations according to the present invention are provided sterile and pyrogen free.
The carrier suitably contains minor amounts of additives such as substances that enhance isotonicity and chemical stability. Such materials are non-toxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed, and include buffers such as phosphate, citrate, succinate, acetic acid, and other organic acids or their salts; antioxidants such as ascorbic acid; low molecular weight (less than about ten residues) polypeptides, e.g., polyarginine or tripeptides; proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, or immunoglobulins; hydrophilic polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone; glycine; amino acids such as glutamic acid, aspartic acid, histidine, or arginine; monosaccharides, disaccharides, and other carbohydrates including cellulose or its derivatives, glucose, mannose, trehalose, or dextrins; chelating agents such as EDTA; sugar alcohols such as mannitol or sorbitol; counter-ions such as sodium; non-ionic surfactants such as polysorbates, poloxamers, or polyethylene glycol (PEG); and/or neutral salts, e.g., NaCl, KCl, MgCl.sub.2, CaCl.sub.2, etc.
Glycerin or glycerol (1,2,3-propanetriol) is commercially available for pharmaceutical use. It may be diluted in sterile water for injection, or sodium chloride injection, or other pharmaceutically acceptable aqueous injection fluid, and used in concentrations of 0.1 to 100% (v/v), preferably 1.0 to 50% more preferably about 20%.
DMSO, which is an aprotic solvent with a remarkable ability to enhance penetration of many locally applied drugs. DMSO may be diluted in sterile water for injection, or sodium chloride injection, or other pharmaceutically acceptable aqueous injection fluid, and used in concentrations of 0.1 to 100% (v/v).
The carrier vehicle may also include Ringer's solution, a buffered solution, and dextrose solution, particularly when an intravenous solution is prepared.
Prior to, or at the time the lysin enzyme is put in the carrier system or oral delivery mode, it is preferred that the enzyme be in a stabilizing buffer environment for maintaining a pH range between about 4.0 and about 9.0, more preferably between about 5.5 and about 7.5 and most preferably at about 6.1. This is pH range is most suitable for the lysin enzyme for Streptococcus.
The stabilizing buffer should allow for the optimum activity of the lysin enzyme. The buffer may be a reducing reagent, such as dithiothreitol. The stabilizing buffer may also be or include a metal chelating reagent, such as ethylenediaminetetracetic acid disodium salt, or it may also contain a phosphate or citrate-phosphate buffer. The buffers found in the carrier can serve to stabilize the environment for the lytic enzymes.
The effective dosage rates or amounts of the lytic enzyme to treat the infection, and the duration of treatment will depend in part on the seriousness of the infection, the duration of exposure of the recipient to the infectious bacteria, the number of square centimeters of skin or tissue which are infected, the depth of the infection, the seriousness of the infection, and a variety of a number of other variables. The composition may be applied anywhere from once to several times a day, and may be applied for a short or long term period. The usage may last for days or weeks. Any dosage form employed should provide for a minimum number of units for a minimum amount of time. The concentration of the active units of enzyme believed to provide for an effective amount or dosage of enzyme may be in the range of about 100 units/ml to about 500,000 units/ml of composition, preferably in the range of about 1000 units/ml to about 100,000 units/ml, and most preferably from about 10,000 to 100,000 units/ml. The amount of active units per ml and the duration of time of exposure depends on the nature of infection, and the amount of contact the carrier allows the lytic enzyme to have. It is to be remembered that the enzyme works best when in a fluid environment. Hence, effectiveness of the enzyme is in part related to the amount of moisture trapped by the carrier. For the treatment of septicemia, there should be a continuous intravenous flow of therapeutic agent into the blood stream. The concentration of lytic enzyme for the treatment of septicemia is dependent upon the seriousness of the infection.
In order to accelerate treatment of the infection, the therapeutic agent may further include at least one complementary agent which can also potentiate the bactericidal activity of the lytic enzyme. The complementary agent can be penicillin, synthetic penicillins bacitracin, methicillin, cephalosporin, polymyxin, cefaclor. Cefadroxil, cefamandole nafate, cefazolin, cefixime, cefmetazole, cefonioid, cefoperazone, ceforanide, cefotanme, cefotaxime, cefotetan, cefoxitin, cefpodoxime proxetil, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, cefriaxone moxalactam, cefuroxime, cephalexin, cephalosporin C, cephalosporin C sodium salt, cephalothin, cephalothin sodium salt, cephapirin, cephradine, cefuroximeaxetil, dihydratecephalothin, moxalactam, loracarbef, mafate, chelating agents and any combinations thereof in amounts which are effective to synergistically enhance the therapeutic effect of the lytic enzyme.
Additionally, the therapeutic agent may further comprise the enzyme lysostaphin for the treatment of any Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. Mucolytic peptides, such as lysostaphin, have been suggested to be efficacious in the treatment of S. aureus infections of humans (Schaffner et al., Yale J. Biol. & Med., 39:230 (1967) and bovine mastitis caused by S. aureus (Sears et al., J. Dairy Science, 71 (Suppl. 1): 244(1988)). Lysostaphin, a gene product of Staphylococcus simulans, exerts a bacteriostatic and bactericidal effect upon S. aureus by enzymatically degrading the polyglycine cross-link of the cell wall (Browder et al., Res. Comm., 19: 393–400 (1965)). U.S. Pat. No. 3,278,378 describes fermentation methods for producing lysostaphin from culture media of S. staphylolyticus, later renamed S. simulans. Other methods for producing lysostaphin are further described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,398,056 and 3,594,284. The gene for lysostaphin has subsequently been cloned and sequenced (Recsei et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84: 1127–1131 (1987)). The recombinant mucolytic bactericidal protein, such as r-lysostaphin, can potentially circumvent problems associated with current antibiotic therapy because of its targeted specificity, low toxicity and possible reduction of biologically active residues. Furthermore, lysostaphin is also active against non-dividing cells, while most antibiotics require actively dividing cells to mediate their effects (Dixon et al., Yale J. Biology and Medicine, 41: 62–68 (1968)). Lysostaphin, in combination with the lysin enzyme, can be used in the presence or absence of the listed antibiotics. There is a degree of added importance in using both lysostaphin and the lysin enzyme in the same therapeutic agent. Frequently, when a body has a bacterial infection, the infection by one genus of bacteria weakens the body or changes the bacterial flora of the body, allowing other potentially pathogenic bacteria to infect the body. One of the bacteria that sometimes co-infects a body is Staphylococcus aureus. Many strains of Staphylococcus aureus produce penicillinase, such that Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and other gram positive bacterial strains will not be killed by standard antibiotics. Consequently, the use of the lysin and lysostaphin, possibly in combination with antibiotics, can serve as the most rapid and effective treatment of bacterial infections. In yet another preferred embodiment, the invention may include mutanolysin, and lysozyme
Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood within the scope of the appended claims the invention may be protected otherwise than as specifically described.
The following application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/482,992, filed Jan. 14, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,264,945, and is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/752,731, filed Jan. 3, 2001, now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2019789 | Mahannah | Nov 1935 | A |
2315260 | Lancaster | Mar 1943 | A |
2763931 | McMillan | Sep 1956 | A |
3465445 | Fisher | Sep 1969 | A |
3622677 | Short et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3852424 | Gaeumann et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3929994 | Hirsch et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3983209 | Schmitt | Sep 1976 | A |
4062941 | Davies | Dec 1977 | A |
4115546 | Vidra et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4116327 | Eglinton et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4122158 | Schmitt | Oct 1978 | A |
4313734 | Leuvering | Feb 1982 | A |
4355022 | Rabussay | Oct 1982 | A |
4361537 | Deutsch et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4369308 | Trubiano | Jan 1983 | A |
4459361 | Gefter | Jul 1984 | A |
4497900 | Abram et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4521252 | Miyake et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4552839 | Gould et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4707543 | Zollinger et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4713249 | Schroder | Dec 1987 | A |
4742981 | Converse | May 1988 | A |
4784948 | Scott et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4812445 | Eden et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4847199 | Snyder et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4859597 | Yang et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4885163 | Shaar et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4933185 | Wheatley et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4948726 | Longoria | Aug 1990 | A |
4957686 | Norris | Sep 1990 | A |
5079174 | Buck et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5108758 | Allwood et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5120643 | Ching et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5162226 | Beachey et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5260292 | Robinson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5294369 | Shigekawa et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5352588 | Fischetti et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5360617 | Gasson | Nov 1994 | A |
5372931 | Friedman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5384265 | Kidwell et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5393658 | Olsen | Feb 1995 | A |
5479732 | Burtch et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5500350 | Baker et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514602 | Brooks, Jr. et al. | May 1996 | A |
5556944 | Fischetti et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5571667 | Chu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5587288 | Cheung et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5602040 | May et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604109 | Fischetti et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604110 | Baker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605793 | Stemmer | Feb 1997 | A |
5616686 | Fischetti et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5643767 | Fischetti et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5688501 | Merril et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5707822 | Fischetti et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5723303 | Fischetti et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741487 | Asai et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5760026 | Blackburn et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763251 | Gasson | Jun 1998 | A |
5786205 | Fischetti et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5821088 | Darzins et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5840314 | Scott et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5882631 | Suga et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5910441 | Rocha et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5968763 | Fischetti et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976792 | Cheung et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985271 | Fischetti et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985654 | Fischetti et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997862 | Fischetti et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017528 | Fischetti et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6056954 | Fischetti et al. | May 2000 | A |
6056955 | Fischetti et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083684 | Gasson | Jul 2000 | A |
6113887 | Mori et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132970 | Stemmer | Oct 2000 | A |
6159688 | Borchert et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6177554 | Woo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187757 | Clackson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190659 | Pancholi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6238661 | Fischetti et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248324 | Fischetti et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254866 | Fischetti et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264945 | Fischetti et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277399 | Fischetti et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6326002 | Fischetti et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331405 | Rambukkana et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335012 | Fischetti et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6355477 | Fischetti et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6399097 | Fischetti et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6399098 | Fischetti et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406692 | Fischetti et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6423299 | Fischetti et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432444 | Fischetti et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0293249 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0359873 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0 510 907 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0510907 A 2 | Oct 1992 | EP |
587541 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0646646 | Apr 1995 | EP |
2357246 | Feb 1978 | FR |
WO-9323544 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO-9531562 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 96 07329 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO-9607329 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 97 02351 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO-9702351 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 99 04809 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO-9904809 | Feb 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020127206 A1 | Sep 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09752731 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 09908737 | US | |
Parent | 09482992 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 09752731 | US |