Patent Grant
12031495
This application claims foreign priority to European Application No. 22215167.2 filed on Dec. 20, 2022, the disclosure and content of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The disclosure relates generally to testing of fuel injectors of a combustion engine. In particular aspects, the disclosure relates to a system and a method for determining fuel leaks. The disclosure can be applied in heavy-duty vehicles, such as trucks, buses, and construction equipment. Although the disclosure may be described with respect to a particular vehicle, the disclosure is not restricted to any particular vehicle.
Combustions engines may be provided with a fuel injection system comprising fuel injectors fluidly connected to a fuel rail. Fuel in the fuel rail is pressurized by one or more fuel pumps and the pressurized fuel is injected into the engine when running the engine. If the fuel injectors are worn or faulty, fuel may leak from the fuel injection system, leading to sub-optimal combustion and/or excessive fuel consumption. A fuel injection system is typically controlled by a control unit. The control unit may be connected to one or more pressure sensors adapted to measure fluid pressure in the fuel injection system, such as in the fuel rail. The control unit typically comprises a proportional-integral-derivative controller (PID controller) adapted to control the at least one fuel pump (4a, 4b) based on at least the fuel pressure in the fuel rail (5). The PID controller may be implemented in any suitable way, such as in software and/or hardware. An integral response of the PID controller represents the fuel leak rate of the fuel injection system. The control unit may indicate that the fuel injection system as a whole is leaky in response to the integral response exceeding a threshold value. When a leaking fuel injection system is indicated, a mechanic may replace all fuel injectors to mitigate the leakage. However, fuel injectors are expensive and not always available off the shelf. Accordingly, it would be advantageous to be able to identify which fuel injectors are leaking and how much they are leaking, such that only bad injectors can be replaced.
A first aspect of the disclosure relates to a system, said system comprising a fuel injection system and a computer system comprising a processor device.
The fuel injection system comprises:
The processor device is configured to, with the engine running, control the at least one fuel pump to increase the pressure in the fuel rail to a baseline pressure at which an integral response of the PID controller reaches a predetermined integral response threshold.
The processor device is configured to, for each respective fuel injector, determine a primary reference integral response associated with the fuel injector by:
Upon fluidly isolating a fuel injector from the fuel rail any leak by the fluidly isolated fuel injector is no longer affecting the integral response reported by the PID controller. The integral response of the PID controller corresponds to a rate of any leak of fuel affecting the pressure in the fuel rail. Running the engine at a specific fuel rail pressure with a specific injector fluidly connected to the fuel rail gives a first integral response. Running the engine at the specific fuel rail pressure with the specific injector fluidly isolated from the fuel rail gives a second integral response. By comparing the first and second integral responses leak by the specific fuel injector can be determined based on any difference between the first and second integral responses.
Some fuel injectors may only leak a little, and only when operated above a certain pressure. To be able to make comparisons of leak rates of the fuel injectors, a baseline pressure is first established by studying the leak rate, i.e. the integral response, of the fuel injection system whilst running the engine with all fuel injectors fluidly connected to the fuel rail. The fuel rail pressure is increased until the integral response reaches a predetermined integral response threshold. The engine is then run at the baseline pressure when determining the effect of fluid isolation of each fuel injector from the fuel rail.
Obtaining the primary reference integral responses associated with each fuel injector, provides information indicating the leak rate of each fuel injector. This information enables a decision to be made as to whether or not to replace one or more fuel injectors, thereby mitigating the need of replacing all fuel injectors when the fuel injection system is leaking.
In some examples, the processor device may further be configured to, before, or after, determining the primary reference integral responses, for each fuel pump or combination of fuel pumps used together/to be used together when determining the primary reference integral responses, determine a respective baseline integral response associated with the fuel pump or combination of fuel pumps.
Each respective baseline integral response is determined by:
If one or more auxiliary fuel pumps are used, it is possible to obtain primary reference integral responses for all fuel injectors using the same fuel pump(s). If only pumping fuel injectors are used as fuel pumps, not all pumping fuel injectors can be used when determining primary reference integral responses, since individual pumping fuel injectors need to be fluidly isolated from the fuel rail.
An effect on the integral response caused by leaks of a fuel injector can be determined by comparing the primary reference integral response to the predetermined integral response threshold. However, the result of the comparison may be affected by a change in which fuel pumps are used when determining the primary reference integral responses, due to variations in integral response associated with running the fuel pumps at different rates required when reducing the number of fuel pumps as compared to the number of fuel pumps used when obtaining the baseline pressure.
Since the baseline integral response is obtained using only those fuel pumps also used when determining the primary reference integral response for each respective fuel injector, the effects, on the integral response, of using different pumps to pressurize the fuel injection system, is accounted for by the baseline integral response(s) obtained. By instead comparing the primary reference integral response to the baseline integral response, the effect on the change of which fuel pumps are used, is accounted for, thereby providing more accurate information for use when determining the leak rate of each fuel injector.
A second aspect of the disclosure relates to a method for determining fuel leak of one or more fuel injectors of a fuel injection system of a combustion engine.
The fuel injection system comprises:
The method comprises:
Upon fluidly isolating a fuel injector from the fuel rail any leak by the fluidly isolated fuel injector is no longer affecting the integral response reported by the PID controller. The integral response of the PID controller corresponds to a rate of any leak of fuel affecting the pressure in the fuel rail. Running the engine at a specific fuel rail pressure with a specific injector fluidly connected to the fuel rail gives a first integral response. Running the engine at the specific fuel rail pressure with the specific injector fluidly isolated from the fuel rail gives a second integral response. By comparing the integral first and second integral responses leak by the specific fuel injector can be determined based on any difference between the first and second integral responses.
Some fuel injectors may only leak a little, and only when operated above a certain pressure. To be able to make comparisons of leak rates of the fuel injectors, a baseline pressure is first established by studying the leak rate, i.e. the integral response, of the fuel injection system whilst running the engine with all fuel injectors fluidly connected to the fuel rail. The fuel rail pressure is increased until the integral response reaches a predetermined integral response threshold. The engine is then run at the baseline pressure when determining the effect of fluid isolation of each fuel injector from the fuel rail.
Obtaining the primary reference integral responses associated with each fuel injector, provides information indicating the leak rate of each fuel injector. This information enables a decision to be made as to whether or not to replace one or more fuel injectors, thereby mitigating the need of replacing all fuel injectors when the fuel injection system is leaking.
In some examples, the method further comprises:
If one or more auxiliary fuel pumps (i.e. a pump not being a pump of a pumping fuel injector) are used, it is possible to obtain primary reference integral responses for all fuel injectors using the same fuel pump(s). If only pumping fuel injectors are used as fuel pumps, not all pumping fuel injectors can be used when determining primary reference integral responses, since individual pumping fuel injectors need to be fluidly isolated from the fuel rail.
An effect on the integral response caused by leaks of a fuel injector can be determined by comparing the primary reference integral response to the predetermined integral response threshold. However, the result of the comparison may be affected by a change in which fuel pumps are used when determining the primary reference integral responses due to variations in integral response associated with running the fuel pumps at different rate required when reducing the number of fuel pumps as compared to the number of fuel pumps used when obtaining the baseline pressure.
Since the baseline integral response is obtained using only those fuel pumps also used when determining the primary reference integral response for each respective fuel injector, the effects, on the integral response, of using different pumps to pressurize the fuel injection system, is accounted for by the baseline integral response(s) obtained. By instead comparing the primary reference integral response to the baseline integral response, the effect on the change of which fuel pumps are used, is accounted for, thereby providing more accurate information for use when determining the leak rate of each fuel injector.
In some examples, the fuel injection system comprises at least two fuel pumps, wherein said obtaining of the primary reference integral response for each fuel injector is performed using only one fuel pump at a time, by enabling one of the fuel pumps, and disabling the other fuel pump(s).
Using only one fuel pump reduces uncertainty related to leaks of the fuel pumps.
In some examples, a subset of the fuel injectors are pumping fuel injectors, wherein each fuel pump is a pump of a respective one of the pumping fuel injectors, and wherein the obtaining of the primary reference integral response for each fuel injector comprises, for each pumping fuel injector fluidly isolated from the fuel rail, using one of the other pumping fuel injectors as the fuel pump for pressurizing the fuel rail when obtaining the primary reference integral response associated with the fluidly isolated pumping fuel injector.
In some examples, the fuel injection system comprises at least three pumping fuel injectors, wherein the method further comprises determining two reference pumping fuel injectors. The determination of two reference pumping fuel injectors is performed before determining the primary reference integral responses. The determination of the two reference pumps comprises:
The two reference pumping fuel injectors are determined as the two pumping fuel injectors with most similar secondary reference integral responses.
Once the two reference pumping fuel injectors have been determined, the determination of the primary reference integral responses is performed using only the fuel pumps of the two reference pumping fuel injectors.
In some examples, the method further comprises:
The fuel leak value indicates how much a fuel injector leaks in absolute terms, and thus enables easy comparison of the difference in leak rate of each fuel injector.
In some examples, the method further comprises comparing each fuel leak value of all fuel injectors to a predetermined first fuel leak threshold, and, in response to the fuel leak value exceeding the first fuel leak threshold, providing an indication that the fuel injector associated with the fuel leak value should be replaced.
In some examples, the method further comprises comparing a first aggregate fuel leak value to a first aggregate fuel leak threshold. The first aggregate fuel leak value is the sum of the respective fuel leak values of all pumping fuel injectors not yet determined to need replacement. The first aggregate fuel leak threshold is a second fuel leak threshold multiplied by the number of pumping fuel injectors not yet determined to need replacement. The second fuel leak threshold is lower than the first fuel leak threshold.
The method further comprises, in response to the first aggregate fuel leak value exceeding the first aggregate fuel leak threshold, providing an indication that all pumping fuel injectors should be replaced.
In some examples, the method further comprises comparing a second aggregate fuel leak value to a second aggregate fuel leak threshold.
The second aggregate fuel leak value is the sum of the respective fuel leak values of all fuel injectors except the pumping fuel injectors, and except any fuel injectors for which an indication of replacement has been provided.
The second aggregate fuel leak threshold is a third fuel leak threshold multiplied by the number of fuel injectors of the fuel injection system except the pumping fuel injectors, and except any fuel injectors for which an indication of replacement has been provided, said third fuel leak threshold being lower than the first fuel leak threshold.
The method further comprises, in response to the second aggregate fuel leak value exceeding the second aggregate fuel leak threshold, providing an indication that all fuel injectors not being pumping fuel injectors, should be replaced.
In some examples, fluid isolation of a fuel injector is achieved by:
In some examples, fluid isolation of a fuel injector is achieved by:
A third aspect relates to a vehicle comprising the processor device to perform the method of the examples described above.
A fourth aspect relates to a computer program product comprising program code for performing, when executed by the processor device, the method of the examples described above.
A fifth aspect relates to a control system comprising one or more control units configured to perform the method of the examples described above.
A sixth aspect relates to a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions, which when executed by the processor device, cause the processor device to perform the method of the examples described above.
The above aspects, accompanying claims, and/or examples disclosed herein above and later below may be suitably combined with each other as would be apparent to anyone of ordinary skill in the art.
Additional features and advantages are disclosed in the following description, claims, and drawings, and in part will be readily apparent therefrom to those skilled in the art or recognized by practicing the disclosure as described herein. There are also disclosed herein control units, computer readable media, and computer program products associated with the above discussed technical benefits.
With reference to the appended drawings, below follows a more detailed description of aspects of the disclosure cited as examples.
Aspects set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure.
A control unit or computer system 6 of a combustion engine may indicate that the fuel injection system of the engine is leaking. To avoid replacing all fuel injectors of the fuel injection system, it would be advantageous to be able to identify which fuel injectors are leaking and how much they are leaking, such that only bad injectors can be replaced.
The system and method disclosed herein enables relevant data to be obtained such that an informed decision can be made as to the rate of leak of each fuel injector. Based on the data, a mechanic can determine which fuel injectors are causing leaks and replace only such fuel injectors. The proposed system and method provides the relevant data in a time-efficient manner.
The disclosure is based on a method which can be implemented in software and/or hardware, except for any manually performed steps in specific embodiments of the disclosure, such as physical removal of a fuel injector 2a, 2b from the fuel rail 5 and subsequent plugging of a port of the fuel rail 5.
Embodiments of a method of the present disclosure will hereinafter be described with reference to the appended schematic figures. The method is applicable to any combustion engine comprising at least two fuel injectors. By way of example, the combustion engine is an internal combustion engine, such as a diesel internal combustion engine, a gaseous internal combustion engine. Moreover, the fuel may generally be any one of a diesel fuel and a gaseous fuel, such as a hydrogen-based fuel or the like. In the example below, the combustion engine is an internal combustion engine for a heavy-duty vehicle, which is operable on a diesel fuel.
A control unit or computer system 6 is provided (not shown) to monitor various sensors of the engine, such as fuel rail pressure and crankshaft position, and to control the fuel injection cycle, fuel rail pressure, etc. Such control units or computer systems 6 for running fuel injected combustion engines are known in the art and will not be described in greater detail.
The control unit or computer system 6 used herein implements a proportional-integral-derivative controller (PID controller) which monitors fuel pressure in the fuel injection system and calculates at least an integral response. The integral represents a fuel leak rate of the fuel injection system. PID controllers are known in the art and will not be described in any greater detail herein. The PID controller can be implemented in any suitable way, such as by the computer system 6 or control unit running a software, or by dedicated hardware.
As further discussed at the end of this description, the computer system 6 may include any collection of devices that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.
The processor device 7 is configured to:
The processor device 7 is further configured to:
Hence, this embodiment of the system implements an automated leak test procedure including automated fluid isolation of fuel injectors 2a, 2b, by operation of a valve (not shown) provided between each fuel injector 2a, 2b and the fuel rail 5. In an alternative embodiment, the fluid isolation could instead be enabled by the processor device 7 by stopping the engine, waiting for a mechanic to physically remove the fuel injector and plug the fuel rail, and subsequently starting the engine such that the respective primary reference integral response can be obtained.
The processor device 7 may further be configured to:
By comparing the primary reference integral response to the baseline integral response, the effect on the change of which fuel pumps are used, is accounted for, thereby providing more accurate information for use when determining the leak rate of each fuel injector.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The method M may comprise:
Throughout the present disclosure, integral responses obtained may be stored in a memory 8. Storing of data in memory 8 may be controlled by a processor device 7.
As shown in the embodiment of
As shown in
As shown in
The determination of the two reference pumps comprises:
In this embodiment of the method, the determination of the primary reference integral responses is performed using only the fuel pumps of the two reference pumping fuel injectors.
To enable easier interpretation of the leak rates of each injector, the method M may comprise:
If fuel leak values have been determined, the method M may further comprise performing a first test (M1) by:
Such an indication is easy to interpret by a mechanic.
Indications may be provided in the form of data displayed on a display device or in by storing in a memory 8 data representing the indication. A processor device 7 may be used to control data storing or to control data display on a display device. This applies also to any further tests described below.
Fuel injectors which leak less than the first fuel leak threshold may still be considered for further use, although further tests may indicate that they need to be replaced after all, as discussed below.
The method M may further comprise performing a second test by comparing a first aggregate fuel leak value to a first aggregate fuel leak threshold.
The first aggregate fuel leak value is the sum of the respective fuel leak values of all pumping fuel injectors 2b not yet determined to need replacement.
The first aggregate fuel leak threshold is a second fuel leak threshold multiplied by the number of pumping fuel injectors 2b not yet determined to need replacement (i.e. no indication that the fuel injector 2a, 2b associated with the fuel leak value should be replaced has been provided during prior testing).
The second fuel leak threshold is lower than the first fuel leak threshold.
The method further comprises, in response to the first aggregate fuel leak value exceeding the first aggregate fuel leak threshold, to provide an indication that all pumping fuel injectors 2b should be replaced.
Hence, the first test may reveal that individual fuel injectors 2a, 2b leak too much and provide an indication of replacement. Thereafter, a second test may look at the total leak of the remaining pumping fuel injectors 2b, and if the total leak rate from those fuel injectors 2b is too high indicate that all pumping fuel injectors 2b should be replaced.
Such an indication is easy to interpret by a mechanic.
The method M may further comprise performing a third test by comparing a second aggregate fuel leak value to a second aggregate fuel leak threshold.
The second aggregate fuel leak value is the sum of the respective fuel leak values of all fuel injectors 2a except the pumping fuel injectors 2b (i.e. of a non-pumping fuel injectors), and except any fuel injectors 2a, 2b for which an indication of replacement has been provided. The second aggregate fuel leak threshold is a third fuel leak threshold multiplied by the number of fuel injectors 2a, 2b of the fuel injection system, except the pumping fuel injectors 2b, and except any fuel injectors 2a, 2b for which an indication of replacement has been provided. The third fuel leak threshold is lower than the first fuel leak threshold.
The method further comprises, in response to the second aggregate fuel leak value exceeding the second aggregate fuel leak threshold, to provide an indication that all fuel injectors 2a not being pumping fuel injectors 2b, should be replaced.
The fluid isolation of the fuel injector 2a, 2b may be achieved by:
Alternatively, the fluid isolation of a fuel injector 2a, 2b may be achieved by: closing one or more valves between the fuel rail 5 and the fuel injector 2a, 2b to be fluidly isolated, such that fuel is prevented from moving between the fuel injector 2a, 2b and the fuel rail 5.
Once the respective primary reference integral response has been obtained, the one or more valve is opened again, thereby fluidly connecting the respective fuel injector 2a, 2b to the fuel rail 5 again such that fuel can be injected by the respective fuel injector 2a, 2b when isolating other fuel injectors and running the engine.
As shown in
It is also proposed to provide a computer program product comprising program code for performing, when executed by the processor device 7, any one of the above-described embodiments of the method M for determining fuel leak of one or more fuel injectors.
It is also proposed to provide a control system comprising one or more control units configured to perform any one of the above-described embodiments of the method M for determining fuel leak of one or more fuel injectors.
It is also proposed to provide a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions, which when executed by the processor device 7, cause the processor device 7 to perform any one of the above-described embodiments of the method M for determining fuel leak of one or more fuel injectors.
The computer system 6 may comprise at least one computing device or electronic device capable of including firmware, hardware, and/or executing software instructions to implement the functionality described herein. The computer system 6 may include a processor device 7 (may also be referred to as a control unit), a memory 8, and a system bus 14. The computer system 6 may include at least one computing device having the processor device 7. The system bus 14 provides an interface for system components including, but not limited to, the memory 8 and the processor device 7. The processor device 7 may include any number of hardware components for conducting data or signal processing or for executing computer code stored in memory 8. The processor device 7 (e.g., control unit) may, for example, include a general-purpose processor, an application specific processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), a circuit containing processing components, a group of distributed processing components, a group of distributed computers configured for processing, or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. The processor device may further include computer executable code that controls operation of the programmable device.
The system bus 14 may be any of several types of bus structures that may further interconnect to a memory bus (with or without a memory controller), a peripheral bus, and/or a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. The memory 8 may be one or more devices for storing data and/or computer code for completing or facilitating methods described herein. The memory 8 may include database components, object code components, script components, or other types of information structure for supporting the various activities herein. Any distributed or local memory device may be utilized with the systems and methods of this description. The memory 8 may be communicably connected to the processor device 7 (e.g., via a circuit or any other wired, wireless, or network connection) and may include computer code for executing one or more processes described herein. The memory 8 may include non-volatile memory 9 (e.g., read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), etc.), and volatile memory 11 (e.g., random-access memory (RAM)), or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a computer or other machine with a processor device 7. A basic input/output system (BIOS) 10 may be stored in the non-volatile memory 9 and can include the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer system 6.
The computer system 6 may further include or be coupled to a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium such as the storage device 15, which may comprise, for example, an internal or external hard disk drive (HDD) (e.g., enhanced integrated drive electronics (EIDE) or serial advanced technology attachment (SATA)), HDD (e.g., EIDE or SATA) for storage, flash memory, or the like. The storage device 15 and other drives associated with computer-readable media and computer-usable media may provide non-volatile storage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions, and the like.
A number of modules can be implemented as software and/or hard coded in circuitry to implement the functionality described herein in whole or in part. The modules may be stored in the storage device 15 and/or in the volatile memory 11, which may include an operating system 12 and/or one or more program modules 13. All or a portion of the examples disclosed herein may be implemented as a computer program product 16 stored on a transitory or non-transitory computer-usable or computer-readable storage medium (e.g., single medium or multiple media), such as the storage device 15, which includes complex programming instructions (e.g., complex computer-readable program code) to cause the processor device 7 to carry out the steps described herein. Thus, the computer-readable program code can comprise software instructions for implementing the functionality of the examples described herein when executed by the processor device 7. The processor device 7 may serve as a controller or control system for the computer system 6 that is to implement the functionality described herein.
The computer system 6 also may include an input device interface 17 (e.g., input device interface and/or output device interface). The input device interface 17 may be configured to receive input and selections to be communicated to the computer system 6 when executing instructions, such as from a keyboard, mouse, touch-sensitive surface, etc. Such input devices may be connected to the processor device 7 through the input device interface 17 coupled to the system bus 14 but can be connected through other interfaces such as a parallel port, an Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) 1394 serial port, a Universal Serial Bus (USB) port, an IR interface, and the like. The computer system 6 may include an output device interface 18 configured to forward output, such as to a display, a video display unit (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 6 may also include a communications interface 19 suitable for communicating with a network as appropriate or desired.
The operational steps described in any of the exemplary aspects herein are described to provide examples and discussion. The steps may be performed by hardware components, may be embodied in machine-executable instructions to cause a processor to perform the steps, or may be performed by a combination of hardware and software. Although a specific order of method steps may be shown or described, the order of the steps may differ. In addition, two or more steps may be performed concurrently or with partial concurrence.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22215167 | Dec 2022 | EP | regional |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6105554 | Nishiyama | Aug 2000 | A |
| 9644556 | Pursifull | May 2017 | B2 |
| 20150106040 | Methil et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20190063284 | Santillo | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190211768 | Dudar | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20200173298 | Romagnoli | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102016119811 | Apr 2018 | DE |
| 102020214226 | May 2022 | DE |
| 3106857 | Aug 2021 | FR |
| Entry |
|---|
| Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 22215167.2, mailed Jun. 28, 2023, 7 pages. |
