The present invention relates generally to floating breakwaters, and more particularly, to floating breakwater systems capable of rapid deployment and retrieval, and capable of breaking or attenuating wave action in open water. In this application, “open water” is used to denote any open water including ocean water, lake water, river water, dam water, and the like.
Breakwaters are typically either bottom-mounted or floating. Bottom-mounted structures are generally composed of large rocks (“rip-rap”) or concrete, and are massive permanent structures. Floating breakwaters have been used for some time as non-permanent structures at harbor entrances, swimming beaches, offshore construction, or for military operations. Typically, these structures include a substantially submerged element which has enough inertial mass to absorb incoming wave energy, and a buoyant element to enable the structure to float. Such floating structures may be moored in a relatively fixed position by lines attached to anchoring points.
Various systems have been developed to achieve a floating breakwater. Some systems have used modular concrete shells or steel frames connected to each other by cables, with inner liners to provide buoyancy. These systems enjoy the advantage of strength and durability, but are massive and cannot easily be launched from, nor retrieved to, a dock or deck of a vessel. Furthermore, because such systems must typically be towed to their destination, they often lack the advantage of rapid deployment.
Thus, despite the use of floating breakwaters for some time, history has witnessed numerous maritime incidents in which ships have run aground in high seas while carrying valuable cargo. In many such incidents, retrieval of such cargo by other vessels has proven difficult or impossible due to an inability to rapidly attenuate wave action in the vicinity of the stricken vessel. Furthermore, certain vessels may need protected anchorage, and a need has been expressed for a robust and rapidly deployable breakwater system that can be deployed in water depths adequate for deep draft vessels, for lightering to smaller vessels or to offload vessels to other vessels or shore during high seas. Further uses for a rapidly deployable floating breakwater include protection of construction sites, swimming beaches, and beach erosion protection during reclamation efforts.
Accordingly, there exists a need for a floating breakwater system which is economical to build, which is capable of being rapidly deployed and retrieved for re-use, and which is capable of attenuating substantial wave action in open water. The present invention addresses these and other needs.
Briefly, and in general terms, the present invention is directed to a new and improved system and apparatus for a transportable and rapidly deployable floating breakwater adapted to attenuate wave action in open water. The floating breakwater includes a pressurized structure made of flexible material, which is especially configured and adapted to have enhanced stiffness and rigidity when deployed, desirable characteristics for effective wave attenuation. When properly positioned and deployed in an area of undesired wave action, the breakwater of the present invention is capable of creating a protected area of attenuated waves in the lee of the breakwater structure.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the breakwater includes a primary barrier in the form of an elongate tubular structure of large cross sectional size or diameter with closed ends, adapted, in the deployed state, to contain water or other liquid which is pressurized to a pressure substantially greater than that of the surrounding water. As used herein, “substantially greater” means a difference in pressure which is adequate to maintain the stiffness and achieve the buckle and wrinkle resistance required for the purpose of wave attenuation. It will be appreciated that such pressurization induces tensile forces in the material forming the wall of the primary barrier, and that such tensile forces enhance the wrinkle and buckle resistance of the material, thus enhancing the overall stiffness of the breakwater, which is a highly desirable characteristic for an effective floating breakwater. Stiffening the breakwater by this means is simple and highly efficient, as it does not require additional structural material which would otherwise be costly and add weight to the breakwater.
In a further aspect of the invention, the breakwater may be adapted so that, after its initial deployment and pressurization, the water within the primary barrier may be continually or periodically re-pressurized throughout the period of deployment of the breakwater in order to maintain a substantially constant level of pressure, or to set the pressure at a different level in order to accommodate a changed sea condition.
A flotation element may be attached to or incorporated into the primary barrier to ensure positive buoyancy of the breakwater at all times. In addition, overtopping barriers may be attached to the top of the primary barrier, adapted to be buoyant in the deployed state and to attenuate wave action which would otherwise overtop the primary barrier.
The breakwater of the present invention is adapted to be expanded from a collapsed condition to an expanded condition in the deployed state. In its deployed condition, the floating breakwater is preferably moored by at least two points along its length and prevented from drifting by mooring lines attached to the ocean bottom or other suitable fixed geographical point. In a deployed state, it is often desirable for the primary barrier to have a relatively large diameter and length. Diameters of between 2 feet and 30 feet may be suitable, depending on prevailing conditions.
In a further aspect, the primary barrier of the invention may be enclosed in or surrounded by a tubular jacket adapted to withstand the forces of the pressurized water within the primary barrier, and to further strengthen and stiffen the primary barrier. In a preferred embodiment, the jacket may be formed of circumferential and longitudinal straps interwoven with each other.
Although a single breakwater unit may be used, a breakwater system may comprise a plurality of breakwater units, incrementally added or subtracted, and arranged to relate to each other in a variety of configurations, depending on prevailing conditions.
The breakwater of the present invention can be used in situations where a permanent breakwater is not feasible, available, or timely. It is also suitable for use in transient conditions, so that it may be temporarily removed if a particularly aggressive sea condition is expected, or if seasonal conditions do not demand the protection of the breakwater. The breakwater of the present invention also has the advantages of being capable of rapid deployment from, and retrieval to, a place of storage on a reel or pallets positioned on a dock or on the deck of a vessel; of being deployed and towed to a desired location, if desired; of being rapidly expanded by filling with water; of having the ability to withstand high seas with little probability of structural failure; of being unlikely to damage vessels with which it may come into contact; and of being lightweight, inexpensive, durable, transportable, and repairable.
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following more detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of illustrative embodiments.
Referring now to the drawings, and in particular, to
A preferred material for manufacturing the primary barrier 20 is a coated textile fabric, such as a waterproof, high strength polyurethane coated polyester fabric material. Other flexible coating materials or other reinforcing fabrics, such as those made from high strength textile fiber, suitable for a marine environment also can be used. To minimize local stresses in the fabric, the barrier may be configured to have hemispherical or dome shaped ends. Prior to being deployed in the water, the primary barrier may be stored in a collapsed condition, most conveniently wound onto a hydraulically powered reel or stack-folded on either the deck of the deploying/retrieving vessel or on a dock for deployment and towing to the installation site.
In its fully deployed state, the water in the cavity of the primary barrier 20 is pressurized to a level substantially greater than the pressure of the water surrounding the barrier. The material embodying the primary barrier 20 is adapted to withstand the forces introduced by such pressure. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that, by pressurizing the water in the primary barrier 20, the material of the primary barrier gains wrinkle and buckle resistance, thus enhancing the primary barrier's overall stiffness. This increased stiffness has beneficial effects on the ability of the water-filled primary barrier 20 to attenuate wave action, as it enables the breakwater to float in the water as an effectively rigid beam.
The desired level of pressurization in the primary barrier is preferably the pressure necessary to resist wrinkle formation in the side of the barrier that is exposed to both current load and wave load. (This will be the worst case, since if the current is applied in the opposite direction to that of the waves, their two load effects will tend to cancel each other.) For any pressurized thin-walled vessel having a diameter D, that is placed in a flowing fluid current with density ρ and velocity V, and is moored at points L distance apart, the pressure P that will resist wrinkling in the thin wall is given by the relationship:
P≈(ρ/πg)(VL/D)2
where g=acceleration due to gravity.
If the wave loading is expressed as a current with a velocity such as would induce an amount of bending in the primary barrier equivalent to that induced by the waves, then the velocity of the actual current (Vcurrent) may be added to the velocity of the (putative) wave induced current (Vwave
Veffective=Vcurrent+Vwave
Thus, in the case of a pressurized primary barrier exposed to both current and wave action forces:
P≈(ρ/πg)(VeffectiveL/D)2
From this relationship it will be seen that, for a given fluid condition and given spacing of mooring points, the pressure required to resist wrinkle formation on the side of the beam exposed to current and wave action is inversely proportional to the square of the diameter of the barrier.
Pressurization of the water may be achieved by pumping into the cavity of the primary barrier, via inlet ports 22, the volume of water required to achieve the desired pressure and level of stiffness. When fresh water is to be used, such will generally be pumped into the cavity while the breakwater is near the shore, whereafter the breakwater will be towed out to its desired location. It will be appreciated that once the desired pressure is initially established, the same may dissipate due to leakage of the water from the primary barrier, or from material stretching, or from changes in temperature. Moreover, it may be found that an initially established pressure must be increased to resist buckling and wrinkling and to maintain the desired stiffness for changing sea conditions. In such cases, pumping may be resumed continuously, intermittently, or at periodic intervals to maintain or vary the desired water pressure after the breakwater is initially fully deployed and pressurized.
Moreover, it is not necessary that the desired water pressure within the primary barrier 20 be maintained only by pumping additional water into the cavity of the primary barrier. The water pressure may be maintained by sealing the primary barrier in a waterproof manner or also by pumping air or other gas into one or more inflatable pressurization tubes 23 (
In a preferred embodiment, it is presently believed that the breakwater 10 will attenuate incoming waves in two ways. Short period, smaller waves may be attenuated primarily by the inertial mass of the water in the larger diameter pressurized primary barrier 20, and by overtopping barriers 24 which deflect wave crests from breaking across the primary barrier. Longer period waves may be attenuated both by the inertial mass of the water in the primary barrier, and by the stiffness of the primary barrier. The stiffness of the primary barrier resists lateral deformation (both horizontal and vertical) of the breakwater, and thereby reduces the transmission of larger waves across the breakwater to the lee side.
In a further aspect of the invention, the strength and stiffness of the primary barrier 20 may be enhanced by enclosing the same in a flexible cylindrical jacket, so that the forces in the fabric of the primary barrier are transferred to the jacket. In this aspect of the invention, the primary barrier 20 may be adapted principally to contain the pressurized water within its cavity, while the jacket may be adapted principally to sustain the forces generated by the pressurized water and wave action, and simultaneously to provide increased stiffness of the breakwater 10. This enables the primary barrier to be made from a lighter weight fabric with less tensile strength, if desired. In a preferred embodiment, exemplified in
It is estimated that a primary barrier 20 having a diameter of between about 6 feet and 30 feet will optimally attenuate wave action in an offshore environment, depending on prevailing conditions, while a primary barrier having a diameter of between about 2 feet and 12 feet in diameter will optimally attenuate wave action in nearshore conditions.
Various factors and conditions may affect the overall optimal configuration of the breakwater. As is apparent from the relationship set forth above, the effective current velocity and the distance between mooring points on the breakwater play primary roles in determining the optimal configuration. Other factors include the amount of wave energy reduction required, the water depth, the extent to which the breakwater protrudes above water level, the breakwater's mass and cross sectional shape, the type of mooring restraint, the wave height, the wave period, the wind velocity, the water temperature, and other environmental factors. Thus, the relationship set forth in the above formula should be seen only as a convenient guide to estimating an initial pressure for the primary barrier. For any given breakwater, the most suitable pressure for any given sea condition may be determined by varying the pressure of the deployed primary barrier from its initial estimated pressure until it behaves satisfactorily. As noted above, it may be found that the initially established pressure dissipates over time, or that an increased pressure is required to deal with an increased sea condition. Such pressure maintenance or variation may be accomplished by periodic or continued pumping and relief during the period the breakwater is deployed.
Although the most appropriate pressure for a primary barrier of given diameter is dependent on many variables, a preferable range of differential pressures (measured as the difference between pressure internal to the barrier and pressure external thereto at any level) may be as follows. For barriers having a diameter of at least two feet, a differential pressure of at least about 10 psi may be preferred; for barriers having a diameter of at least 4 feet, at least about 3 psi may be preferred; for barriers having a diameter of at least 6 feet, at least about 1 psi is preferred; and, for barriers having a diameter of at least 12 feet, at least about 0.5 psi is preferred.
It is presently contemplated that barriers configured in accordance with the present invention may be used at differential pressures ranging from about 0.5 psi (for the largest diameters) to at least 30 psi, depending on size and prevailing conditions, with pressures of about 2-10 psi being common for larger diameter systems.
In a further aspect of the present invention exemplified in
The overtopping barriers 24 may be attached in their collapsed state to the primary barrier 20 in its collapsed state in the manner exemplified in
In a further aspect of the invention, exemplified in
It will further be appreciated that, in the deployed state, the space between two adjacent overtopping barriers 24 may provide a convenient protected walkway when the breakwater 10 is made from sufficiently large barriers, thereby providing a somewhat protected platform for operation, inspection, and maintenance of the breakwater. Where continued pumping is required to maintain or vary the water pressure within the cavity of the primary barrier 20, as referenced above, it may nevertheless become necessary for the support vessel to leave the vicinity of the breakwater. In this event, it may be desirable to mount a pump 46 on the upper surface of the primary barrier 20 (especially where protective overtopping barriers 24 are attached to the jacket or primary barrier) to maintain or vary the pressure within the primary barrier by means of continued pumping. Pumping may be triggered, if necessary, by a switch configured to sense the pressure within the primary barrier and to switch on the pump when the pressure falls below a designated level. Furthermore, where straps 28, 32 are used to strengthen and stiffen the primary barrier, the same may form a conveniently rigid slip-resistant surface between the overtopping barriers 24 to facilitate movement of personnel along the length of the breakwater 10.
As to storage, deployment, and retrieval,
It will be appreciated that positioning a breakwater 10 at right angles to the direction of the approaching waves achieves the longest shadow of calm water behind the breakwater. Depending on the prevailing conditions, it has been found that the breakwater of the present invention will adequately attenuate wave action when thus positioned. Alternatively, a breakwater 10 may be positioned at an angle to the direction of the approaching waves. While this orientation provides a narrower shadow of calm water behind the breakwater, it may have the advantage of enabling the breakwater to attenuate more energetic wave action. Whatever length is used for each breakwater unit, it may be desirable to attach a number of breakwaters 10 to each other end-to-end, to form an elongated breakwater system which may exceed 1000 feet in length. In a variation of this aspect, the breakwaters may be positioned to form an arc around a specific point of interest. Alternatively, a series of parallel breakwater units may be positioned in staggered, shingle-like fashion, in the path of the oncoming waves. In a further variation, a breakwater system may include a plurality of barriers arranged as a “V,” pointing into the oncoming waves, or as a “λ” (lambda) with the long leg presenting a straight barrier positioned at an angle to the path of the oncoming waves. The ideal orientation, in each case, is determined by wind, current and wave conditions.
As noted above, it is estimated that a primary barrier 20 having a diameter between about 6 feet and 30 feet will optimally attenuate wave action in an offshore condition, while a primary barrier having a diameter between about 2 feet and 12 feet will optimally attenuate wave action in a nearshore condition. Suitable corresponding tubular overtopping barriers for such configurations will have a size of about 3 feet to 6 feet and about 1 foot to 4 feet in diameter, respectively. When finally positioned as desired, each breakwater structure 10 may be moored to the bottom, as exemplified in
The breakwater of the present invention has the primary advantage of maintaining an enhanced stiffness through pressurization of its fluid contents, so that the breakwater may act as a rigid beam in the water, capable of absorbing and attenuating wave action. Other advantages include being economical in that it is easy to build, to transport, to rapidly deploy and retrieve, to repair, and to store. It may be made primarily from inexpensive, durable fabric, which, being lightweight and flexible, is unlikely to cause substantive damage to vessels even in elevated sea condition conditions. Indeed, the breakwater may serve the additional function of buffering ships from colliding with maritime objects, and a vessel would be able to moor alongside the breakwater without the need for additional fendering. The breakwater may be pressurized to maintain a desired level of stiffness to reduce wave action. The internal pressure of the primary barrier 20 may be controlled as necessary to provide the optimum wave suppression for a given condition. The materials embodying the breakwater may all be corrosion resistant materials that have demonstrated long-life capabilities both in the stored and deployed environments. By fabricating the breakwater as a continuous structure, frequent joints can be avoided.
It will be apparent from the foregoing that, while particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described, various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, while the drawings of the Figures illustrate primary barrier 20, overtopping barrier 24, and pressurization tube 23 each having a circular cross section, the exact cross sectional shape of these elements can be varied, and may in each case assume any cross sectional shape capable of performing the element's described function. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10190224 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 10861305 | Jun 2004 | US |
Parent | 09751164 | Dec 2000 | US |
Child | 10190224 | Jul 2002 | US |