System and apparatus for treating the lens of an eye

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9180051
  • Patent Number
    9,180,051
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 1, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 10, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A system and apparatus for increasing the amplitude of accommodation and/or changing the refractive power and/or enabling the removal of the clear or cataractous lens material of a natural crystalline lens is provided. Generally, the system comprises a laser, optics for delivering the laser beam and a control system for delivering the laser beam to the lens in a particular pattern. There is further provided apparatus for determining the shape and position of the lens with respect to the laser. There is yet further provided a method and system for delivering a laser beam in the lens of the eye in a predetermined shot pattern.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The anatomical structures of the eye are shown in general in FIG. 1, which is a cross sectional view of the eye. The sclera 131 is the white tissue that surrounds the lens 103 except at the cornea 101. The cornea 101 is the transparent tissue that comprises the exterior surface of the eye through which light first enters the eye. The iris 102 is a colored, contractible membrane that controls the amount of light entering the eye by changing the size of the circular aperture at its center (the pupil). The ocular or natural crystalline lens 103, a more detailed picture of which is shown in FIGS. 1A-F, (utilizing similar reference numbers for similar structures) is located just posterior to the iris 102. The terms ocular lens, natural crystalline lens, natural lens, natural human crystalline lens, and lens (when referring to the prior terms) are used interchangeably herein and refer to the same anatomical structure of the human eye.


Generally, the ocular lens changes shape through the action of the ciliary muscle 108 to allow for focusing of a visual image. A neural feedback mechanism from the brain allows the ciliary muscle 108, acting through the attachment of the zonules 111, to change the shape of the ocular lens. Generally, sight occurs when light enters the eye through the cornea 101 and pupil, then proceeds through the ocular lens 103 through the vitreous 110 along the visual axis 104, strikes the retina 105 at the back of the eye, forming an image at the macula 106 that is transferred by the optic nerve 107 to the brain. The space between the cornea 101 and the retina 105 is filled with a liquid called the aqueous 117 in the anterior chamber 109 and the vitreous 110, a gel-like clear substance, in the chamber posterior to the lens 103.



FIG. 1A illustrates, in general, components of and related to the lens 103 for a typical 50-year old individual. The lens 103 is a multi-structural system. The lens 103 structure includes a cortex 113, and a nucleus 129, and a lens capsule 114. The capsule 114 is an outer membrane that envelopes the other interior structures of the lens. The lens epithelium 123 forms at the lens equatorial 121 generating ribbon-like cells or fibrils that grow anteriorly and posteriorly around the ocular lens. The nucleus 129 is formed from successive additions of the cortex 113 to the nuclear regions. The continuum of layers in the lens, including the nucleus 129, can be characterized into several layers, nuclei or nuclear regions. These layers include an embryonic nucleus 122, a fetal nucleus 130, both of which develop in the womb, an infantile nucleus 124, which develops from birth through four years for an average of about three years, an adolescent nucleus 126, which develops from about four years until puberty which averages about 12 years, and the adult nucleus 128, which develops at about 18 years and beyond.


The embryonic nucleus 122 is about 0.5 mm in equatorial diameter (width) and 0.425 mm in Anterior-Posterior axis 104 (AP axis) diameter (thickness). The fetal nucleus 130 is about 6.0 mm in equatorial diameter and 3.0 mm in AP axis 104 diameter. The infantile nucleus 124 is about 7.2 mm in equatorial diameter and 3.6 mm in AP axis 104 diameter. The adolescent nucleus 126 is about 9.0 mm in equatorial diameter and 4.5 mm in AP axis 104 diameter. The adult nucleus 128 at about age 36 is about 9.6 mm in equatorial diameter and 4.8 mm in AP axis 104 diameter. These are all average values for a typical adult human lens approximately age 50 in the accommodated state, ex vivo. Thus this lens (nucleus and cortex) is about 9.8 mm in equatorial diameter and 4.9 mm in AP axis 104 diameter. Thus, the structure of the lens is layered or nested, with the oldest layers and oldest cells towards the center.


The lens is a biconvex shape as shown in FIGS. 1 and 1A. The anterior and posterior sides of the lens have different curvatures and the cortex and the different nuclei in general follow those curvatures. Thus, the lens can be viewed as essentially a stratified structure that is asymmetrical along the equatorial axis and consisting of long crescent fiber cells arranged end to end to form essentially concentric or nested shells. The ends of these cells align to form suture lines in the central and paracentral areas both anteriorly and posteriorly. The older tissue in both the cortex and nucleus has reduced cellular function, having lost their cell nuclei and other organelles several months after cell formation.


Compaction of the lens occurs with aging. The number of lens fibers that grow each year is relatively constant throughout life. However, the size of the lens does not become as large as expected from new fiber growth. The lens grows from birth through age 3, from 6 mm to 7.2 mm or 20% growth in only 3 years. Then the next approximate decade, growth is from 7.2 mm to 9 mm or 25%; however, this is over a 3 times longer period of 9 years. Over the next approximate 2 decades, from age 12 to age 36 the lens grows from 9 mm to 9.6 mm or 6.7% growth in 24 years, showing a dramatically slowing observed growth rate, while we believe there is a relatively constant rate of fiber growth during this period. Finally, in the last approximately 2 decades described, from age 36 to age 54, the lens grows by a tiny fraction of its youthful growth, from 9.6 to 9.8 mm or 2.1% in 18 years. Although there is a geometry effect of needing more lens fibers to fill larger outer shells, the size of the older lens is considerably smaller than predicted by fiber growth rate models, which consider geometry effects. Fiber compaction including nuclear fiber compaction is thought to explain these observations.


In general, presbyopia is the loss of accommodative amplitude. In general refractive error is typically due to variations in the axial length of the eye. Myopia is when the eye is too long resulting in the focus falling in front of the retina. Hyperopia is when the eye is too short resulting in the focus falling behind the retina. In generally, cataracts are areas of opacification of the ocular lens which are sufficient to interfere with vision. Other conditions, for which the present invention is directed, include but are not limited to the opacification of the ocular lens.


Presbyopia most often presents as a near vision deficiency, the inability to read small print, especially in dim lighting after about 40-45 years of age. Presbyopia, or the loss of accommodative amplitude with age, relates to the eyes inability to change the shape of the natural crystalline lens, which allows a person to change focus between far and near, and occurs in essentially 100% of the population. Accommodative amplitude has been shown to decline with age steadily through the fifth decade of life.


Historically, studies have generally attributed loss of accommodation to the hardening of the crystalline lens with age and more specifically, to an increase in the Young's Modulus of Elasticity of the lens material. More recent studies have examined the effect of aging on the relative change in material properties between the nucleus and cortex. These studies have provided varying theories and data with respect to the hardening of the lens. In general, such studies have essentially proposed the theory that the loss of flexibility is the result of an increase in the Young's Modulus of Elasticity of the nucleus and/or cortex material. Such studies have viewed this hardening as the primary factor in the loss of accommodative amplitude with age and hence the cause of presbyopia.


Although the invention is not bound by it, the present specification postulates a different theory of how this loss of lens flexibility occurs to cause presbyopia. In general, it is postulated the structure of the lens rather than the material properties of the lens plays a greater role in loss of flexibility and resultant presbyopia than was previously understood. Thus, contrary to the teachings of the prior studies in this field as set forth above, material elasticity is not the dominate cause of presbyopia. Rather, it is postulated that it is the structure of the lens and changes in that structure with age that is the dominant cause of presbyopia. Thus, without being limited to or bound by this theory, the present invention discloses a variety of methods and systems to provide laser treatments to increase the flexibility of the lens, based at least in part on the structure of the lens and structural changes that occur to the lens with aging. The present invention further discloses providing laser treatments to increase the flexibility of the lens that are based primarily on the structure of the lens and structural changes that occur to the lens with aging.


Accordingly, the postulated theory of this specification can be illustrated for exemplary purposes by looking to and examining a simple hypothetical model. It further being understood this hypothetical model is merely to illustrate the present theory and not to predict how a lens will react to laser pulses, and/or structural changes. To understand how important structure alone can be, consider a very thin plank of wood, say 4 ft by 4 ft square but 0.1 inch thick. This thin plank is not very strong and if held firmly on one end, it does not take much force to bend this thin plank considerably. Now consider five of these same 0.1 inch thickness planks stacked on top of each other, but otherwise not bound or tied together. The strength would increase and for the same force a somewhat smaller deflection will occur. Now, consider taking those same five planks and fastening them together with many screws or by using very strong glue, or by using many C-Clamps to bind them together. The strength of the bound planks is much higher and the deflection seen from the same force would be much smaller.


Without saying this simple model reflects the complex behavior of the lens, we generally hypothesize that when considering a volume of lens material, especially near the poles (AP axis), that is essentially bound by increased friction and compaction due to aging, that separating those bound layers into essentially unbound layers will increase the deflection of those layers for the same applied force and hence increase flexibility of the lens. Applicants, however, do not intend to be bound by the present theory, and it is provided solely to advance the art, and is not intended to and does not restrict or diminish the scope of the invention,


Thus, further using this model for illustration purposes, under the prior theories and treatments for presbyopia, the direction was principally toward the material properties, i.e., Modulus of the material in the stack, rather than on the structure of the stack, i.e., whether the layers were bound together. On the other hand, the presently postulated theory is directed toward structural features and the effects that altering those features have on flexibility.


In general, current presbyopia treatments tend to be directed toward alternatives to increasing the amplitude of accommodation of the natural crystalline lens. These treatments include a new class of artificial accommodative Intraocular Lenses (IOL's), such as the Eyeonics CRYSTALENS, which are designed to change position within the eye; however, they offer only about 1 diopter of objectively measured accommodative amplitude, while many practitioners presently believe 3 or more diopters are required to restore normal visual function for near and far objects. Moreover, researchers are pursuing techniques and materials to refill the lens capsule with synthetic materials. Additionally, present surgical techniques to implant artificial accommodative IOL's are those developed for the more serious condition of cataracts. It is believed that practitioners are reluctant at the present time to replace a patient's clear albeit presbyopic natural crystalline lens, with an accommodative IOL due to the risks of this invasive surgical technique on a patient who may simply wear reading glasses to correct the near vision deficiency. However, developments may offer greater levels of accommodative amplitude in implantable devices and refilling materials. To better utilize such device improvements and to increase the accommodative amplitude of existing implantable devices, improved surgical techniques are provided herein as a part of the present invention.


Refractive error, typically due to the length of the eye being too long (myopia) or to short (hyperopia) is another very common problem effecting about one-half of the population. Laser surgery on the cornea, as proposed by Trokel and L'Esperance and improved by Frey and others, does offer effective treatment of refractive errors but factors such as higher degrees of refractive error, especially in hyperopia, thin corneas or a changing refractive error with time, such as that brought on by presbyopia, limit the clinical use of laser corneal surgery for many.


SUMMARY

Provided herein are embodiments of the present invention. Accordingly, there is provided a system and apparatus for delivering a laser beam to a lens of an eye that utilize a laser, an optical path for directing a laser beam from the laser to the lens of the eye, a means for determining the shape and position of the lens with respect to a fixed point, and means for focusing a laser beam to a location in the lens of the eye, wherein that location was determined based at least in part upon data and/or information from the determining step.


There is further provided a system and apparatus for delivering a laser beam in the lens of the eye in a predetermined shot pattern that utilize as series of shots that form a shell cut, a partial shell cut, a laser suture cut and/or a volumetric shaped removal, which essentially following the shape of a suture layer of the lens, i.e., a layer shape of the lens.


There is further provided a system and apparatus for treating conditions of the lens comprising a laser, laser focusing optics, a scanner and a control system that has a plurality of means for directing in cooperation with the laser, the scanner and the laser focusing optics, laser shot patterns.


There is further provided a system for delivering a laser to an eye and for obtaining stereo images of the eye comprising a laser, focusing optics, a scanner and a camera. Wherein the scanner is optically associated with the laser and the camera so that the scanner has the capability to provide stereo pairs of images of the eye and deliver a laser beam from the laser to the eye.


There is also provided a system and apparatus for treating conditions of the lens comprising: a laser, laser focusing optics, a scanner, a control system, a predetermined lens shot pattern, and a means for determining the position of the lens, wherein the means for determining may comprise a scanned laser illumination source, one or more cameras and/or a structured light source. Moreover, such a system for delivering lasers to an eye and/or for obtaining stereo images of the eye comprising, a first laser for therapeutic purposes, i.e. a therapeutic laser, focusing optics, a camera, a second laser, serving as a laser illumination source, i.e., an illumination laser, and, a scanner optically associated with the first and second lasers and the camera; wherein the scanner has the capability to provide stereo pairs of images of the eye and deliver a laser beam from the first laser to the eye and deliver a laser beam from the second laser to the eye, is further provided.


There is further provided a system for delivering a laser to an eye and for determining the position of the eye comprising a patient support, a laser, optics for delivering a laser beam, a control system for delivering the laser beam to the lens of the eye in a particular pattern, a lens position determination apparatus, and, a laser patient interface.


One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, based on the teachings set forth in these specifications and drawings, that there are various embodiments and implementations of these teachings to practice the present invention. Accordingly, the embodiments in this summary are not meant to limit these teachings in any way.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1 and 1A are cross sectional representations of the human eye.



FIG. 2 is a block schematic diagram of a type of system for delivering a laser beam shot pattern to the lens of an eye according to the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 2A is a block schematic diagram of illustrative components forming a portion of a system for delivering a laser beam shot pattern to the lens of an eye according to the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 2B is a block schematic diagram of illustrative components forming a portion of a system for delivering a laser beam shot pattern to the lens of an eye according to the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 2C is a block schematic diagram of illustrative components forming a portion of a system for delivering a laser beam shot pattern to the lens of an eye according to the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 2D is a block schematic diagram of illustrative components forming a portion of a system for delivering a laser beam shot pattern to the lens of an eye according to the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 2E is a block schematic diagram of illustrative components forming a portion of a system for delivering a laser beam shot pattern to the lens of an eye according to the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a diagram of the anterior surface of a lens normal to the AP axis illustrating a laser shot pattern having a flower like shape which has a contour generally following approximately the last 15% of the fiber length from the end of the fiber.



FIGS. 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D and 4E are diagrams representing elevation views of the geometry used for the development of laser shot patterns based upon the structure of the fetal nucleus (three suture branch nucleus) as it is rotated from the posterior view 4A through and to the anterior view 4E.



FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C are diagrams representing posterior, side and anterior elevation views, respectively, of the geometry used for the development of laser shot patterns based upon the structure of the infantile nucleus (six suture branch nucleus).



FIGS. 6A, 6B and 6C are diagrams representing posterior, side and anterior elevation views, respectively of the geometry used for the development of laser shot patterns based upon the structure of the adolescent nucleus (nine suture branch nucleus).



FIGS. 7A, 7B and 7C are diagrams representing posterior, side and anterior elevation views, respectively of the geometry used for the development of laser shot patterns based upon the structure of the an adult nucleus (12 suture branch).



FIGS. 8 and 8A are perspective cutout views of an adult lens representing the placement of essentially concentric shells in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 9 is a cross-section drawing of the lens relating to the model developed by Burd.



FIG. 10 is a cross-section drawing of a lens based upon the model developed by Burd.



FIG. 11 is a cross-section drawing of a lens based upon the model developed by Burd.



FIG. 12 is a cross-section drawing of a lens based upon the model developed by Burd.



FIG. 13 is a cross-section drawing of a lens showing the placement of a shell laser shot pattern in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 14 is a cross-section drawing of a lens showing the placement of a shell laser shot pattern in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 15 is a cross-section drawing of a lens showing the placement of a partial shell laser shot pattern in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 16 is a cross-section drawing of a lens showing the placement of a partial shell laser shot pattern in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 17 is a cross-section drawing of a lens showing the placement of a shell laser shot pattern in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIGS. 18-24 are cross-section drawings of a lens showing the placement of a volumetric removal laser shot patterns in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 25 is a cross-section drawing of a lens showing the placement of a cube laser shot pattern in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIGS. 26-27 are cross-section drawings of a lens showing the placement of a gradient index modification laser shot patterns in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIGS. 28 A, C and E diagrams depicting laser suture cut shot patterns on the anterior portion of a lens of the present invention.



FIGS. 28 B, D, and F are diagrams illustrating the placement of the shot patterns of FIGS. 28 A, C, and E respectively.



FIG. 29 is a diagram illustrating the relative placement of the shot patterns of FIGS. 28 A, C, and E, if performed in the same lens.



FIGS. 30 A-D are diagrams of the cross-section of a lens illustrating a capsulorhexis shot pattern of the present invention.



FIGS. 31 A-D are diagrams illustrating youthful vs old age gradient index behavior.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS AND THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In general, the present invention provides a system and method for increasing the amplitude of accommodation and/or changing the refractive power and/or enabling the removal of the clear or cataractous lens material of a natural crystalline lens. Thus, as generally shown in FIG. 2 there is provided a system for delivering a laser beam shot pattern to the lens of an eye comprising: a patient support 201; a laser 202; optics for delivering the laser beam 203; a control system for delivering the laser beam to the lens in a particular pattern 204, which control system 204 is associated with and/or interfaces with the other components of the system as represented by lines 205; a means for determining the position of lens with respect to the laser 206, which means 206 receives an image 211 of the lens of the eye; and a laser patient interface 207.


The patient support 201 positions the patent's body 208 and head 209 to interface with the optics for delivering the laser beam 203.


In general, the laser 202 should provide a beam 210 that is of a wavelength that transmits through the cornea, aqueous and lens. The beam should be of a short pulse width, together with the energy and beam size, to produce photodisruption. Thus, as used herein, the term laser shot or shot refers to a laser beam pulse delivered to a location that results in photodisruption. As used herein, the term photodisruption essentially refers to the conversion of matter to a gas by the laser. In particular, wavelengths of about 300 nm to 2500 nm may be employed. Pulse widths from about 1 femtosecond to 100 picoseconds may be employed. Energies from about a 1 nanojoule to 1 millijoule may be employed. The pulse rate (also referred to as pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and pulses per second measured in Hertz) may be from about 1 KHz to several GHz. Generally, lower pulse rates correspond to higher pulse energy in commercial laser devices. A wide variety of laser types may be used to cause photodisruption of ocular tissues, dependent upon pulse width and energy density. Thus, examples of such lasers would include: the Delmar Photonics Inc. Trestles-20, which is a Titanium Sapphire (Ti:Sapphire) oscillator having a wavelength range of 780 to 840 nm, less than a 20 femtosecond pulse width, about 100 MHz PRF, with 2.5 nanojoules; the Clark CPA-2161, which is an amplified Ti:Sapphire having a wavelength of 775 nm, less than a 150 femtosecond pulse width, about 3 KHz PRF, with 850 microjoules; the IMRA FCPA (fiber chirped pulse amplification) μjewel D series D-400-HR, which is a Yb:fiber oscillator/amplifier having a wavelength of 1045 nm, less than a 1 picosecond pulse width, about 5 MHz PRF, with 100 nanojoules; the Lumera Staccato, which is a Nd:YVO4 having a wavelength of 1064 nm, about 10 picosecond pulse width, about 100 KHz PRF, with 100 microjoules; and, the Lumera Rapid, which is a ND:YVO4 having a wavelength of 1064 nm, about 10 picosecond pulse width, and can include one or more amplifiers to achieve approximately 2.5 to 10 watts average power at a PRF of between 25 kHz to 650 kHz and also includes a multi-pulsing capability that can gate two separate 50 MHz pulse trains. and, the IMRA FCPA (fiber chirped pulse amplification) pJewel D series D-400-NC, which is a Yb:fiber oscillator/amplifier having a wavelength of 1045 nm, less than a 100 picosecond pulse width, about 200 KHz PRF, with 4 microjoules. Thus, these and other similar lasers may be used a therapeutic lasers.


In general, the optics for delivering the laser beam 203 to the natural lens of the eye should be capable of providing a series of shots to the natural lens in a precise and predetermined pattern in the x, y and z dimension. The optics should also provide a predetermined beam spot size to cause photodisruption with the laser energy reaching the natural lens. Thus, the optics may include, without limitation: an x y scanner; a z focusing device; and, focusing optics. The focusing optics may be conventional focusing optics, and/or flat field optics and/or telecentric optics, each having corresponding computer controlled focusing, such that calibration in x, y, z dimensions is achieved. For example, an x y scanner may be a pair of closed loop galvanometers with position detector feedback. Examples of such x y scanners would be the Cambridge Technology Inc. Model 6450, the SCANLAB hurrySCAN and the AGRES Rhino Scanner. Examples of such z focusing devices would be the Phsyik International Peizo focus unit Model ESee Z focus control and the SCANLAB varrioSCAN.


In general, the control system for delivering the laser beam 204 may be any computer, controller, and/or software hardware combination that is capable of selecting and controlling x y z scanning parameters and laser firing. These components may typically be associated at least in part with circuit boards that interface to the x y scanner, the z focusing device and/or the laser. The control system may also, but does not necessarily, have the further capabilities of controlling the other components of the system as well as maintaining data, obtaining data and performing calculations. Thus, the control system may contain the programs that direct the laser through one or more laser shot patterns.


In general, the means for determining the position of the lens with respect to the laser 206 should be capable of determining the relative distance with respect to the laser and portions of the lens, which distance is maintained constant by the patient interface 207. Thus, this component will provide the ability to determine the position of the lens with respect to the scanning coordinates in all three dimensions. This may be accomplished by several methods and apparatus. For example, x y centration of the lens may be accomplished by observing the lens through a co-boresighed camera system and display or by using direct view optics and then manually positioning the patients'eye to a known center. The z position may then be determined by a range measurement device utilizing optical triangulation or laser and ccd system, such as the Micro-Epsilon opto NCDT 1401 laser sensor and/or the Aculux Laser Ranger LR2-22. The use of a 3-dimensional viewing and measurement apparatus may also be used to determine the x, y and z positions of the lens. For example, the Hawk 3 axis non-contact measurement system from Vision Engineering could be used to make these determinations. Yet a further example of an apparatus that can be used to determine the position of the lens is a 3-dimension measurement apparatus. This apparatus would comprise a camera, which can view a reference and the natural lens, and would also include a light source to illuminate the natural lens. Such light source could be a structured light source, such as for example a slit illumination designed to generate 3-dimensional information based upon geometry.


A further component of the system is the laser patient interface 207. This interface should provide that the x, y, z position between the natural lens and the laser remains fixed during the procedure, which includes both the measurement steps of determining the x y z position and the delivery step of delivering the laser to the lens in a shot pattern. The interface device may contain an optically transparent applanator. One example of this interface is a suction ring applanator that is fixed against the outer surface of the eye and is then positioned against the laser optical housing, thus fixing the distance between the laser, the eye and the natural lens. Reference marks for the 3-dimensional viewing and measuring apparatus may also be placed on this applanator. Moreover, the interface between the lower surface of the applanator and the cornea may be observable and such observation may function as a reference. A further example of a laser patient interface is a device having a lower ring, which has suction capability for affixing the interface to the eye. The interface further has a flat bottom, which presses against the eye flattening the eye's shape. This flat bottom is constructed of material that transmits the laser beam and also preferably, although not necessarily, transmits optical images of the eye within the visible light spectrum. The upper ring has a structure for engaging with the housing for the laser optics and/or some structure that is of known distance from the laser along the path of the laser beam and fixed with respect to the laser. Further examples of such devices are generally disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. D462442, U.S. Pat. No. D462443, and U.S. Pat. No. D459807S, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. As an alternative to an applanator, the interface may be a corneal shaped transparent element whereby the cornea is put into direct contact with the interface or contains an interface fluid between.


An illustrative combination utilizing by way of example specific optics for delivering the laser beam 203 and means for determining the position of the lens 206, is shown in part, in FIG. 2A. FIG. 2A is a more detailed schematic diagram of a configuration of the system of FIG. 2. Thus, the example of FIG. 2A provides a laser 202, laser optics for delivering the laser beam 203, which optics comprise a beam expander telescope 220, a z focus mechanism 221, a beam combiner 222, an x y scanner 223, and focusing optics 224. There is further provided in FIG. 2A relay optics 230, camera optics 231, which may also include a zoom, and a ccd camera 232, which components form a part of a three-dimensional viewing and measuring apparatus. Moreover, these components 231 and 232 in combination with a light source 233, and the scanner 223 are the means for determining the position of the lens 206.


This combination of FIG. 2A utilizes the x y scanner 223 to create stereoscopic images of the lens with only a single ccd camera 232. Optical images 211 of the eye 213 and in particular optical images of the natural lens 103 of the eye 213 are conveyed along a path 211. This path 211 follows the same path as the laser beam 210 from the natural lens 103 through the laser patient interface 207, the focusing optics 224, the x y scanner 223 and the beam combiner 222. This combination of FIG. 2A further comprises: a laser patient interface 207, and a light source 233, which could be for example uniform illumination, or a slit illumination or other structured light source designed to enhance 3-dimensional accuracy. The light source, in part, provides illumination of the natural lens of the patient's eye for the purposes of determining the 3-dimensional position of the lens. Thus, either stereoscopic images and/or the information from the camera are sent to a controller and/or computer (not shown in FIG. 2A) for further processing and use in determining 3-dimensional positions of the lens. Stereo images may be generated by commanding the scanner to go to and pause at a nominal left position and then electronically trigger the camera and controller to capture and store the left image; then command the scanner/camera/controller similarly to capture and store a right image. This sequence may be repeated in a periodic manner. These left and right images can be processed by the controller to generate the position and shape of the lens. The left and right images can be displayed using a stereo video monitor. Camera images or stereo images may also be used to measure suture geometry and orientation in the patients lens, which can be used to determine the parameters of suture based shot patterns and to align suture based shot patterns to the patients lens suture geometry and orientation. The combination illustrated in FIG. 2A provides 3-dimensional information that can be used to determine the shape of the lens, including the anterior and posterior surfaces thereof. This information can also be used to visualize the structure of the lens, including sutures. Moreover, the information about the lens obtained from the combination of FIG. 2A can further be used in determining the laser shot pattern and laser shot placement with respect to lens shape and/or structure.


FIGS. 2 and 2A-2E are block schematic diagrams and thus the relative positions and spacing of the components illustrated therein are by way of example. Accordingly, the relative placements of these components with respect to one another may be varied and all or some of their functions and components may be combined.



FIGS. 2B-2E are further more detailed embodiments of a portion of the system of FIG. 2. To the extent that like numbers are used in these Figures and in FIGS. 2 and 2A they have the same meaning. Thus, FIGS. 2B-2E provide further examples and combinations of optics for delivering the laser beam 203 and means for determining the position of the lens 206.



FIG. 2B is a block schematic diagram of a portion of a system having a means for determining the position of the lens 206, which employs a scanned laser illumination source. Thus, there is provided a laser illumination source 235, a beam expander and focusing optics 236, an illumination laser path 237 and a camera 238 for viewing the lens 103 as illuminated by the laser illumination source. Component 235 in combination with the scanner 223 and camera 238 are the means for detecting the position of the lens 206.


The laser illumination source 235 can be any visible or near infrared laser diode, preferably with a short coherence length for reduced speckle. For example, the laser can be a Schafter+Kirchhoff Laser (90CM-M60-780-5-Y03-C-6) or can also be obtained from StockerYale and may also come with focusing optics. In operation, x y scanner 223 scans the beam from the illumination laser 235 into the focusing optics 224, through the patient interface 207 and onto the lens 103. Thus, the beam from the illumination laser 235 follows the illumination laser path 237. The beam expander focusing optics 236 combined with focusing optics 224 provide a high F number, slow focusing beam with long depth of field. The depth of field is approximately equal to the path length of the laser illumination beam through the lens 103. Thus, producing small and approximately equal sized spots at the anterior and posterior of lens 103. The illumination laser beam is scanned, predominately in one axis, in a line at a rate sufficiently fast compared to the camera 238 exposure time such that the scanned illumination laser beam acts like a slit illumination source during the exposure time. On subsequent exposures or frames of the camera 238, the illumination laser beam is scanned to different positions, thus, illuminating the entire lens over time. This can occur as a series of y scanned lines with different x positions exposures or the lines can be radially scanned with each exposure at a different angle. From the analysis of the data from all of these images thus obtained, the three-D position and shape of the anterior and posterior surfaces and the spatial distribution of the scattering amplitude of the lens material between those surfaces can be determined. This information may be processed by the control system and used for screening patients and implementing laser shot patterns.



FIG. 2C is a block schematic diagram of a portion of a system having a means for detecting the position of the lens 206, which employs dual cameras. Thus, there is provided a left camera 241 and a right camera 242. Components 241, 242 and 233 are the means for detecting the position of the lens 206.


The system of FIG. 2C utilizes two camera stereo viewing technology for providing patient care capability and for obtaining images and data for determining lens position and/or shape. From the analysis of the data from the images thus obtained, the three-D position and shape of the anterior and posterior surfaces and the spatial distribution of the scattering amplitude of the lens material between those surfaces can be determined. This information may be processed by the control system and used for screening patients and implementing laser shot patterns.



FIG. 2D is a block schematic diagram of a portion of a system having a means for detecting the position of the lens 206, which employs structured illumination. Thus, there is provided a structured light source 245 and a camera 246, having a lens 247, for viewing the structured light source. Components 245 and 246 in combination are a means for detecting the position of the lens 206.


The system of FIG. 2D utilizes a structured light source and a camera to provide patient care capability and for obtaining images and data for determining lens position and/or shape. From the analysis of the data from the images thus obtained, the three-D position and shape of the anterior and posterior surfaces and the spatial distribution of the scattering amplitude of the lens material between those surfaces can be determined. This information may be processed by the control system and used for screening patients and implementing laser shot patterns.



FIG. 2E is a block schematic diagram of a portion of a system having a means for detecting the position of the lens 206, which employs structured illumination and dual cameras. Thus, there is provided a structured light source 245, a camera 246 for viewing the structured light source, a lens 247 for camera 246, a left camera 241 and a right camera 242. Components 245 and 246, in combination are the means for detecting the position of the lens 206. Components 241 and 242, in combination are a means for providing patient care, including monitoring capability. This combination 241, 242 may also provide information and/or data to determine the position of the lens.


The combination of components in the system illustrated in FIG. 2E provides the ability to optimize the accuracy of determining the position of the lens, while also providing the ability to separately and/or independently optimize patient care. Patient care includes, but is not limited to, visualization of the eye and its surrounding area, procedures such as attaching a suction ring, applying ophthalmic drops, utilizing instruments, and positioning the patient for surgery. In one embodiment the structured light source 245 may be a slit illumination having focusing and structured light projection optics, such as a Schafter+Kirchhoff Laser Macro Line Generator Model 13LTM+90CM, (Type 13LTM-250S-41+90CM-M60-780-5-Y03-C-6) or a StockerYale Model SNF-501-660-20-5. In this embodiment the structured illumination source 245 also includes scanning means. Another embodiment of the structured light source 245, may be a stationary grid pattern projected on the lens. From the analysis of the data from the images thus obtained, the three-D position and shape of the anterior and posterior surfaces and the spatial distribution of the scattering amplitude of the lens material between those surfaces can be determined. This information may be processed by the control system and used for screening patients and implementing laser shot patterns.


When using a scanned slit illumination the operation includes positioning the slit on one side of the lens, taking an image then moving the slit approximately one slit width, then taking another image, and then repeating this sequence until the entire lens is observed. For example, a 100 μm slit width can scan a nominal 9 mm dilated pupil diameter in 90 images, which takes approximately 3 seconds using a 30 Hz frame rate camera. To obtain images of the anterior and posterior surface in a single image without overlap, the slit should be at an angle to the AP axis, i.e., it should not be parallel to that axis. The nominal slit angle can be approximately 15 to 30 degrees from the AP axis. Any visible or near IR wavelength source within the sensitivity of the camera may be used. Low coherence length sources are preferable to reduce speckle noise.


Another embodiment for the structured light illumination sub-system shown in FIG. 2E is to arrange the structured light illumination source 245, the structured light camera 246 and the lens for the structured light camera 247 in the so-called Scheimpflug configuration which is well-known. In Summary, the Scheimpflug condition states that given an object, a lens and an image, that the object plane is imaged sharply in the image plane if the object plane, the lens plane and the image plane intersect in the same line. The structured light source 245 projects a line and or a plurality of lines onto the eye lens 103 at an angle or plurality of angles. The light scattered at the eye lens 103 forms the object to be imaged by the lens 247 and focused onto the camera system 246. Since the slit illuminated image in the eye lens 103 may be at a large angle with respect to the camera lens 247 and camera 246, this presents a large depth of field to the camera and the entire slit image may not be in sharp focus at the camera. By tilting the camera lens and the camera at an angle or plurality of angles such that Scheimpflug's condition is met, the image along the illuminated plane can be in sharp focus. Alternately, the camera and/or lens may be tilted such that the angle between the slit illuminated image plane and the camera focal plane is reduced, improving the dept-of-focus sharpness, however may not meet the Scheimpflug condition. Such configurations can improve sharpness further by reducing the aperture of the optical path, thereby increasing the F# of the system. These angles will depend on the angle the slit beam makes with the eye. This will increase the depth of field at the object, the scattered light from the slit illuminator, and allow it to imaged through the lens onto the camera image plane and remain in focus for the entire depth of the object.


There is further provided the use of a structured light illuminating and receiving system, such as for example slit illumination, which in addition to measuring the position and shape of anterior and posterior lens surfaces in three dimensions, can be used as a screening tool for determining a candidate patient's suitability for laser lens surgery. Thus, light from a structured light system is directed toward the subject lens. The amplitude of the received scattered light distributed throughout the lens is then evaluated to detect scattering regions that are above threshold, which is a level of scattering that would interfere with the laser surgery. Thus, the detection of lens scattering malformations that could interfere with, or reduce the efficacy of a procedure can be detected and evaluated. Such scattering malformations of the lens would include, without limitation, cataractous, pre-cataractous and non-cataractous tissue. Such scattering malformations, may be located throughout the lens, or may be restricted to specific regions of the lens. For example the systems of FIGS. 2A-2E in cooperation with a controller and/or processor may function as such a structured light illuminating and receiving system.


The structured light illuminating and receiving system may be contained within the surgical laser system or it may be a separate unit for evaluating the suitability of a candidate patient for laser lens surgery. Commercially available examples of such structured light illuminating and receiving systems are the Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems GALILEI Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and the Oculus, Inc. PENTACAM. It is believed that these systems cannot be used to determine the position of the lens with respect to the treatment laser. However, lens shape data from these systems may be obtained and then used in conjunction with position data provided by systems such as the systems of FIGS. 2A-2E.


Note that for the embodiments of FIGS. 2A-E, the combination of the therapeutic laser and the associated laser beam and optics to generate a laser beam of a predetermined wavelength and predetermined spot size when delivered to a predetermined volume of a portion of a natural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye is defined to be part of a laser system.


By suitability, it is meant that laser lens surgery may be indicated or contra-indicated for a particular patient's lens. In addition, it is also meant that certain shot patterns, and/or combinations and placement of shot patterns may be indicated or contra-indicated, depending upon the location of the malformations, the shot patterns, the placement of the shot patterns and the intended effect of the shot pattern. Malformations that would substantially interfere with the desired effect of a laser shot pattern would make that laser shot pattern contra-indicated. Thus, for example, for a patient with a posterior scattering malformation, laser surgery in the anterior of that particular lens would be indicated, for example a pattern such as that shown in FIG. 20, while laser surgery in the posterior would be contra-indicated, such as the patterns shown in FIG. 21.



FIGS. 4 A-E illustrate the three branched or Y suture geometry in the context of the structures found in the fetal nucleus 415 of the lens. Thus, these figures provide a more detailed view of the structures illustrated as layer 130, which encompasses layer 122 of FIG. 1A. In FIGS. 4 A-E the view of the inner layer of the lens is rotated stepwise from the posterior side FIG. 4A to the anterior side FIG. 4E of the lens. Thus, this layer of the lens has three posterior suture lines 401, 402, and 403. This layer also has three anterior suture lines 412, 413 and 414. The anterior suture lines are longer than the posterior suture lines and these lines are staggered when viewed along the anterior to posterior (AP) axis 411. The lens fibers, which form the layers of the nucleus, are shown by lines 404, it being understood that these are only illustrative lines and that in the actual natural layer of the lens there would be many times more fibers present. To aid in illustrating the structure and geometry of this layer of the nucleus representative fibers 405, 406, 407, 408, 409 and 410 have been exaggerated and individually shaded in FIGS. 4 A-E. Thus, as the view of the lens nucleus is rotated from posterior to anterior the positions of these representative fibers, there relationship to each other, and there relationship to the suture lines is illustrated.


The length of the suture lines for the anterior side are approximately 75% of the equatorial radius of the layer or shell in which they are found. The length of the suture lines for the posterior side are approximately 85% of the length of the corresponding anterior sutures, i.e, 64% of the equatorial radius of that shell.


The term—essentially follows—as used herein would describe the relationship of the shapes of the outer surface of the lens and the fetal nucleus 415. The fetal nucleus is a biconvex shape. The anterior and posterior sides of the lens have different curvatures, with the anterior being flatter. These curvatures generally follow the curvature of the cortex and the outer layer and general shape of the lens. Thus, the lens can be viewed as a stratified structure consisting of long crescent fiber cells arranged end to end to form essentially concentric or nested shells.


As provided in greater detail in the following paragraphs and by way of the following examples, the present invention utilizes this and the further addressed geometry, structure and positioning of the lens layers, fibers and suture lines to provide laser shot patterns for increasing the accommodative amplitude of the lens. Although not being bound by this theory, it is presently believed that it is the structure, positioning and geometry of the lens and lens fibers, in contrast to the material properties of the lens and lens fibers, that gives rise to loss of accommodative amplitude. Thus, these patterns are designed to alter and affect that structure, positioning and/or geometry to increase accommodative amplitude.



FIGS. 5A-C illustrate the six branched or star suture geometry in the context of the structure found in the infantile layer of the nucleus 515 of the lens. Thus, these figures provide a more detailed view of the structures illustrated as layer 124 of FIG. 1A. In FIGS. 5A-C the view of the layer of the lens is rotated from the posterior side FIG. 5A to a side view FIG. 5B to the anterior side FIG. 5C. Thus, this layer of the nucleus has six posterior suture lines 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, and 506. This layer of the nucleus also has six anterior suture lines 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, and 514. The anterior suture lines are longer than the posterior suture lines and these lines are staggered when viewed along the AP axis 508. The lens fibers, which form the layers of the nucleus, are shown by lines 507, it being understood that these are only illustrative lines and that in the actual natural layer of the lens there would be many times more fibers present.


The shape of the outer surface of the lens essentially follows the infantile nucleus 515, which is a biconvex shape. Thus, the anterior and posterior sides of this layer of the lens have different curvatures, with the anterior being flatter. These curvatures generally follow the curvature of the cortex and the outer layer and general shape of the lens. These curvatures also generally follow the curvature of the fetal nucleus 415. Thus, the lens can be viewed as a stratified structure consisting of long crescent fiber cells arranged end to end to form essentially concentric or nested shells, with the infantile nucleus 515 having the fetal nucleus 415 nested within it. As development continues through adolescence, additional fiber layers grow containing between 6 and 9 sutures.



FIGS. 6A-C illustrate the nine branched or star suture geometry in the context of the structure found in the adolescent layer of the nucleus 611 of the lens. Thus, these figures provide a more detailed view of the structures illustrated as layer 126 of FIG. 1A. In FIGS. 6A-C the view of the layer of the lens is rotated from the posterior side FIG. 6A to a side view FIG. 6B to the anterior side FIG. 6C. Thus, this layer of the nucleus has nine posterior suture lines 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608 and 609. This layer of the nucleus also has nine anterior suture lines 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619 and 620. The anterior suture lines are longer than the posterior suture lines and these lines are staggered when viewed along the AP axis 610. The lens fibers, which form the layers of the nucleus, are shown by lines 621; it being understood that these are only illustrative lines, and that in the actual natural layer of the lens there would be many times more fibers present.


The outer surface of the cornea follows the adolescent nucleus 611, which is a biconvex shape. Thus, the anterior and posterior sides of this layer have different curvatures, with the anterior being flatter. These curvatures generally follow the curvature of the cortex and the outer layer and general shape of the lens. These curvatures also generally follow the curvature of the fetal nucleus 415 and the infantile nucleus 515, which are nested within the adolescent nucleus 611. Thus, the lens can be viewed as a stratified structure consisting of long crescent fiber cells arranged end to end to form essentially concentric or nested shells. As development continues through adulthood, additional fiber layers grow containing between 9 and 12 sutures.



FIGS. 7A-C illustrates the twelve branched or star suture geometry in the context of the structure found in the adult layer of the nucleus 713 of the lens. Thus, these figures provide a more detailed view of the adult layer 128 depicted in FIG. 1A. In FIGS. 7A-C the view of the layer of the lens is rotated from the posterior side FIG. 7A to a side view FIG. 7B to the anterior side FIG. 7C. Thus, the adult layer of the nucleus has twelve posterior suture lines 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, and 712. This layer of the nucleus also has twelve anterior suture lines 714-725. The anterior suture lines are longer than the posterior suture lines and these lines are staggered when viewed along the AP axis 726. The lens fibers, which form the layers of the nucleus, are shown by lines 728; it being understood that these are only illustrative lines, and that in the actual natural layer of the lens there would be many times more fibers present.


The adult nucleus 713 is a biconvex shape that follows the outer surface of the lens. Thus, the anterior and posterior sides of this layer have different curvatures, with the anterior being flatter. These curvatures follow the curvature of the cortex and the outer layer and shape of the lens. These curvatures also generally follow the curvature of the adolescent nucleus 611, the infantile nucleus 515 and the fetal nucleus 415 and the embryonic nucleus, which are essentially concentric to and nested within the adult nucleus 611. Thus, the lens can be viewed as a stratified structure consisting of long crescent fiber cells arranged end to end to form essentially concentric or nested shells.


A subsequent adult layer having 15 sutures may also be present in some individuals after age 40. This subsequent adult layer would be similar to the later adult layer 713 in general structure, with the recognition that the subsequent adult layer would have a geometry having more sutures and would encompass the later adult layer 713; and as such, the subsequent adult layer would be the outermost layer of the nucleus and would thus be the layer further from the center of the nucleus and the layer that is youngest in age.


In general, the present invention provides for the delivery of the laser beam in patterns that utilize, or are based at least in part on, the lens suture geometry and/or the curvature of the lens and/or the various layers within the nucleus; and/or the curvatures of the various layers within the nucleus; and/or the suture geometry of the various layers within the nucleus. As part of the present invention the concept of matching the curvature of the anterior ablations to the specific curvature of the anterior capsule, while having a different curvature for posterior ablations, which in turn match the posterior curvature of the lens is provided. Anterior and posterior curvatures can be based on Kuszak aged lens models, Burd's numeric modeling, Burd et al. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2235-2251, or on specific lens measurements, such as those that can be obtained from the means for determining the position of the lens with respect to the laser. Thus, in general, these laser delivery patterns are based in whole and/or in part on the mathematical modeling and actual observation data regarding the shape of the lens, the shape of the layers of the lens, the suture pattern, and the position of the sutures and/or the geometry of the sutures.


Moreover, as set forth in greater detail, it is not necessary that the natural suture lines of the lens or the natural placement of the layers of the lens be exactly replicated in the lens by the laser shot pattern. In fact, exact replication of these natural structures by a laser shot pattern, while within the scope of the invention, is not required, and preferably is not necessary to achieve an increase in accommodative amplitude. Instead, the present invention, in part, seeks to generally emulate the natural lens geometry, structures and positioning and/or portions thereof, as well as build upon, modify and reposition such naturally occurring parameters through the use of the laser shot patterns described herein.


Accordingly, laser beam delivery patterns that cut a series of essentially concentric, i.e., nested, shells in the lens may be employed. Preferably, the shells would essentially follow the anterior and posterior curvature of the lens. Thus, creating in the lens a series of cuts which resemble the nucleus layers of FIGS. 4, 5, 6 and 7. These cuts may follow the same geometry, i.e., shape and distance from the center, of these layers or may follow only a part of that geometry. One example of these shells is illustrated in FIG. 8, which provides a lens 103, a first shell cut 801, a first shell 802, a second shell cut 803, a second shell 804 and a third shell cut 805. The adult nucleus 128 and cortex 113 are also provided. Thus, the term shell refers to the lens material and the term shell cut refers to the laser beam delivery pattern and consequently the placement of the laser beam shots in the lens in accordance with that pattern. More or less shell cuts, and thus shells may be utilized. Moreover, the cuts may be such that they in effect create a complete shell, i.e., the shell and shell cuts completely encompass a volume of lens material. The cuts may also be such that less than a complete shell is formed. Thus, the creation of partial shells, by the use of partial shell cuts, may be employed. Such partial cuts would for example be only a portion of a shell e.g., the anterior quartile, the anterior half, the posterior quartile, stacked annular rings, staggered annular rings, and/or combinations thereof. Such partial shells and shell cuts may be any portion of a three dimensional form, including ellipsoid, spheroids and combinations thereof as those terms are used in their broadest sense that in general follows the contours of the lens, capsule, cortex, nucleus, and/or the layers of the lens including the layers of the nucleus. Moreover, the use of complete and partial shells and shell cuts may be used in a single lens. Thus, by way of illustration of this latter point, the first and second cuts 801 and 803 are annular cuts, while the third cut is a complete cut.


A further use of partial shells is to have the shape of the shells follow the geometry and/or placement of the suture lines. Thus, partial pie shaped shells are created, by use of partial pie shaped shell cuts. These cuts may be placed in between the suture lines at the various layers of the lens. These partial shells may follow the contour of the lens, i.e., have a curved shape, or they may be flatter and have a more planar shape or be flat. A further use of these pie shape shells and shell cuts would be to create these cuts in a suture like manner, but not following the natural suture placement in the lens. Thus, a suture like pattern of cuts is made in the lens, following the general geometry of the natural lens suture lines, but not their exact position in the lens. In addition to pie shaped cuts other shaped cuts may be employed, such as by way of illustration a series of ellipses, rectangular planes or squares.


A further use of partial shells and/or planar partial shells is to create a series of overlapping staggered partial shells by using overlapping staggered partial shell cuts. In this way essentially complete and uninterrupted layers of lens material are disrupted creating planar like sections of the lens that can slide one atop the other to thus increase accommodative amplitude. These partial shells can be located directly atop each other, when viewed along the AP axis, or they could be slightly staggered, completely staggered, or any combination thereof.


In addition to the use of shells and partial shells, lines can also be cut into the lens. These lines can follow the geometry and/or geometry and position of the various natural suture lines. Thus, a laser shot pattern is provided that places shots in the geometry of one or more of the natural suture lines of one or more of the various natural layers of the lens as shown in FIGS. 4, 5, 6, and 7, as well as in the 15 suture line layer, or it may follow any of the other patterns in the continuum of layers in the lens. These shot patterns can follow the general geometry of the natural suture lines, i.e., a series of star shapes with the number of legs in each star increasing as their placement moves away from the center of the lens. These star shaped shot patterns may follow the precise geometry of the natural suture patterns of the layers of the lens; or it can follow the exact geometry and placement of the sutures, at the same distances as found in the natural lens or as determined by modeling of the natural lens. In all of these utilizations of star patterns one or more stars may be cut. The length of the lines of the legs of the star may be the longer, shorter or the same length as the natural suture lines. Moreover, if the length is shorter than the natural length of the suture lines, it may be placed toward the center of the star shape, i.e. the point where the lines join each other, or towards the end of the suture line, i.e., the point furthest on the suture line from the joining point. Further, if the cut is towards the end of the suture line it may extend beyond the suture line or may be co-terminus therewith. Moreover, partial star shaped cuts can be used, such as cuts having a “V” shape, or vertical or horizontal or at an angle in between. These linear cuts, discussed above, are in general referred to herein as laser created suture lines. Moreover, laser created suture lines may be grouped together to in effect form a shell or partial shell.


At present, it is theorized that the use of cuts near the end of the suture lines will have the greatest effect on increasing accommodative amplitude because it is believed that the ends of fibers near the anterior and posterior poles (the point where the AP axis intersects the lens) of the lens are more free to move then the portions of fibers near the equator where there is a greater number of gap junctions which bind fiber faces. At present, it is postulated that it is approximately the last 15% of the fiber length that is most free in the youthful lens with high accommodative amplitude. It is further theorized that fiber layers tend to become bound with age due to a combination of increase in surface roughness and compaction due to growth of fiber layers above. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 3 a shot pattern 301 is provided to an anterior portion of a layer 302 of the lens. This shot pattern 301 has a contour 303 that follows the contour of approximately the last 15% of fiber length of fibers, represented by lines 304. Thus, the shell cut resembles the shape of a flower. Additionally, the number of petals in the flower shaped shell should correspond to the number of suture lines 305 at that growth layer. Thus, it is theorized that this partial shell cut and/or cuts will have the effect of unbinding the layers and returning the lens to a more youthful increased amplitude of accommodation. Similarly, using partial shells, annular partial shells or planar partial shells in this general area, i.e., the general area at or near the ends of the suture lines, may be employed for the same reasons. This theory is put forward for the purposes of providing further teaching and to advancing the art. This theory, however, is not needed to practice the invention; and the invention and the claims herein are not bound by or restricted by or to this theory.


The use of laser created suture lines, including star shaped patterns may also be used in conjunction with shells, partial shells and planar partial shells. With a particular laser shot pattern, or series of shot patterns, employing elements of each of these shapes. These patterns may be based upon the geometry shown in FIGS. 4-7 as well as the 15 suture line geometry discussed herein; they may follow that geometry exactly, in whole or in part; and/or they may follow that geometry, in whole or in part, as well as following the position of that geometry in the lens. Although a maximum of 15 suture lines is known in the natural lens, more than 15 laser created suture lines may be employed. Moreover, as provided herein, the lens has multiple layers with a continuum of suture lines ranging from 3 to 15 and thus, this invention is not limited to the suture patents of FIGS. 4-7, but instead covers any number of suture lines from 3 to 15, including fractions thereof.


The delivery of shot patterns for the removal of lens material is further provided. A shot pattern that cuts the lens into small cubes, which cubes can then be removed from the lens capsule is provided. The cubes can range in size from a side having a length of about 100 μm to about 4 mm, with about 500 μm to 2 mm being a preferred size. Additionally, this invention is not limited to the formation of cubes and other volumetric shapes of similar general size may be employed. In a further embodiment the laser is also used to create a small opening, capsulorhexis, in the lens anterior surface of the lens capsule for removal of the sectioned cubes. Thus, this procedure may be used to treat cataracts. This procedure may also be used to remove a lens having opacification that has not progressed to the point of being cataractous. This procedure may further be used to remove a natural lens that is clear, but which has lost its ability to accommodate. In all of the above scenarios, it being understood that upon removal of the lens material the lens capsule would subsequently house a suitable replacement, such as an IOL, accommodative IOL, or synthetic lens refilling materials. Moreover, the size and the shape of the capsulorhexis is variable and precisely controlled and preferably is in 2 mm or less diameter for lens refilling applications and about 5 mm for IOLs. A further implementation of the procedure to provide a capsulorhexis is to provide only a partially annular cut and thus leave a portion of the capsule attached to the lens creating a hinged flap like structure. Thus, this procedure may be used to treat cataracts.


It is further provided that volumetric removal of the lens can be performed to correct refractive errors in the eye, such as myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism. Thus, the laser shot pattern is such that a selected volume and/or shape of lens material is removed by photodisruption from the lens. This removal has the affect of alternating the lens shape and thus reducing and/or correcting the refractive error. Volumetric removal of lens tissue can be preformed in conjunction with the various shot patterns provided for increasing accommodative amplitude. In this manner both presbyopia and refractive error can be addressed by the same shot pattern and/or series of shot patterns. The volumetric removal of lens tissue finds further application in enhancing corrective errors for patients that have had prior corneal laser visions correction, such as LASIK, and/or who have corneas that are too thin or weak to have laser corneal surgery.


In all of the laser shot patterns provided herein it is preferred that the laser shot patterns generally follow the shape of the lens and placement of individual shots with respect to adjacent shots in the pattern are sufficiently close enough to each other, such that when the pattern is complete a sufficiently continuous layer and/or line and/or volume of lens material has been removed; resulting in a structural change affecting accommodative amplitude and/or refractive error and/or the removal of lens material from the capsule. Shot spacing of lesser or greater distances are contemplated herein and including overlap as necessary to obtain the desired results. Shot spacing considerations include gas bubble dissipation, volume removal efficiency, sequencing efficiency, scanner performance, and cleaving efficiency among others. For example, by way of illustration, for a 5 μm size spot with an energy sufficient to cause photodisruption, a spacing of 20 μm or greater results in individual gas bubbles, which are not coalesced and dissipate more quickly, than with close shot spaces with the same energy, which result in gas bubble coalescence. As the shot spacing gets closer together volume efficiency increases. As shot spacing gets closer together bubble coalescence also increases. Further, there comes a point where the shot spacing becomes so close that volume efficiency dramatically decreases. For example, by way of illustration, for a 450 femtosecond pulse width and 2 microjoules energy and about a 5 μm spot size with a 10 μm separation results in cleaving of transparent ocular tissue. As used herein, the term cleaving means to substantially separate the tissue. Moreover, the forgoing shot spacing considerations are interrelated to a lesser or greater extent and one of skill in the art will know how to evaluate these conditions based upon the teachings of the present disclosure to accomplish the objectives herein. Finally, it is contemplated that the placement of individual shots with respect to adjacent shots in the pattern may in general be such that they are as close as possible, typically limited by the size and time frame of photodisruption physics, which would include among other things gas bubble expansion of the previous shot. As used herein, the time frame of photodisruptive physics referrers to the effects that take place surrounding photodisruption, such as plasma formation and expansion, shock waive propagation, and gas bubble expansion and contraction. Thus, the timing of sequential pulses such that they are timed faster than some of, elements of, or all of those effects, can increase volumetric removal and/or cleaving efficiency. Accordingly, we propose using pulse repetition frequencies from 50 MHz to 5 GHz., which could be accomplished by a laser with the following parameters: a mode lock laser of cavity length from 3 meters to 3 cm. Such high PRF lasers can more easily produce multiple pulses overlapping a location allowing for a lower energy per pulse to achieve photodisruption.


The terms first, second, third, etc. as used herein are relative terms and must be viewed in the context in which they are used. They do not relate to timing, unless specifically referred to as such. Thus, a first cut may be made after a second cut. In general, it is preferred to fire laser shots in general from posterior points in the laser pattern to anterior points, to avoid and/or minimize the effect of the gas bubbles resulting from prior laser shots. However, because of the varied laser shot patterns that are provided herein, it is not a requirement that a strict posterior to anterior shot sequence be followed. Moreover, in the case of cataracts it may be advantageous to shoot from anterior to posterior, because of the inability of the laser to penetrate substantially beyond the cataract.


Without further elaboration, it is believed that one skilled in the art can, using the preceding description, utilize the present invention to its fullest extent. The following specific embodiments are, therefore, provided as examples of the invention and should be construed as being merely illustrating and not limiting the scope of the invention or the disclosure herein in any way whatsoever.


The following examples are based upon measured lens data and lens data that is obtained by using Burd modeling, which model is set forth in Burd et al., Numerical modeling of the accommodating lens, Visions Research 42 (2002) 2235-2251. The Burd model provides the following algorithm for anterior and/or posterior shape:

Z=aR5+bR4+cR3+dR2+f


The coefficients for this algorithm are set forth in Table II.















TABLE II







a
b
c
d
f





















Anterior (11-year)
−0.00048433393427 
0.00528772036011
−0.01383693844808 
−0.07352941176471 
2.18


Posterior (11-year)
0.00300182571400
−0.02576464843559 
0.06916082660799
0.08928571428571
−2.13 


Anterior (29-year)
−0.00153004454939 
0.01191111565048
−0.02032562095557 
−0.07692307692308 
2.04


Posterior (29-year)
0.00375558685672
−0.03036516318799 
0.06955483582257
0.09433962264151
−2.09 


Anterior (45-year)
−0.00026524088453 
0.00449862869630
−0.01657250977510 
−0.06578947368421 
2.42


Posterior (45-year)
0.00266482873720
−0.02666997217562 
0.08467905191557
0.06172839506173
−2.42 









Additionally, the variables Z and R are defined by the drawing FIG. 9.


Thus, FIGS. 10, 11 and 12 provide cross sectional views of the lens having an outer surface 1001, 1101, 1201 for three ages, 18, 29 and 45-year old respectively, based upon the Burd model and show growth in size along with shape changes with age. The units for the axes on these drawings, as well as for FIGS. 13 to 29 are in millimeters (mm).


EXAMPLE 1, provides for making nested, lens shaped shell cuts. The laser shot patterns are illustrated in FIG. 13, which provides the outer surface 1301 of a 45-year old lens based upon the Burd model. There is further provided a series of nested or essentially concentric shells and shell cuts, which essentially follow the shape of the lens. Thus, there is provided a first shell cut 1302, a second shell cut 1304, and a third shell cut 1306. These shell cuts form a first shell 1303 and a second shell 1305. Shells or partial shells are designed to increase flexibility in the lens by decreasing the strength of nested fiber layers by separating the bound layers, which it is theorized would reduce the structural strength and increase deflection for a given load or force. Thus, although not bound by this theory, it theorized that increasing the deflection of the lens for a given load or zonule force will increase the flexibility of the lens structure and, in turn, the amplitude of accommodation for that same zonule force. Thus, there are provided a nested set of three layers, which essentially follows both the anterior and posterior shapes. Moreover, it being readily understood that for this and the other examples that the shell cut is formed by and thus corresponds to a laser shot pattern.


Thus, the shell cuts in this example are positioned approximately such that the third shell cut 1306 is where 3 suture branches begin forming additional branches, or approximately 6 mm lens equatorial diameter, at the boundary of the fetal nucleus, or the lens at birth; the second shell cut 1304 is where the 6 suture branch layer begins forming additional branches at approximately 7.2 mm diameter, or the infantile nucleus or the lens at approximately age 3; and the first shell cut is where the 9 suture branch begins forming additional branches at approximately 9 mm diameter, or at the adolescent nucleus at approximately age 13.


EXAMPLE 2, provides as an alternative to using a 45-year old lens shape from the Burd model, the actual patient lens structural or shape data may be utilized to customize surgery for each patient. As an example, a 45-year old human cadaver lens, whose shape was measured optically and mathematically fit via the same fifth order function used in the Burd model, yields coefficients unique to the measured lens. The outer cross-section shape of this lens and a shot pattern similar to that of Example 1, but which was tailored to the particular lens of this Example is illustrated in FIG. 14. Thus, there is provided in this Figure an outer surface 1401 of the 45-year old lens. There is further provided a series of nested or essentially concentric shells and shell cuts. Thus, there is provided a first shell cut 1402, a second shell cut 1404, and a third shell cut 1406. These shell cuts form a first shell 1403 and a second shell 1405. It is further noted that any of the exemplary cuts and shot patterns can be implemented via partial or full shells and/or can be implemented via modeled (the Burd model being just one example) or measured lens data.


EXAMPLE 3 provides a shot pattern for cutting partial shells on the measured 45-year old lens, and having an excluded defined central zone. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 15 there is provided an outer surface 1501 of a 45-year old lens, a central zone 1512, partial cuts 1502, 1504, 1506, 1507, 1509 and 1511. This also provided partial shells 1503, 1505, 1508 and 1510. These partial cuts as shown are part of the same generally annularly shaped. Thus, cuts 1502 and 1507, cuts 1504 and 1509, and cuts 1506 and 1511 are the opposite sides respectively of three generally annularly shaped partial.


EXAMPLE 4 provides a shot pattern for cutting partial shells on the measured 45-year old lens, and having both an excluded defined peripheral zone and central zone. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 16, there is provided an outer surface 1601 of a 45-year old lens, a central zone 1622 and two peripheral zones 1620 and 1621. There is further provided partial cuts 1602, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1607, 1611, 1613, 1615, 1617, and 1618 as well as, partial shells 1603, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1612, 1614, 1616 and 1619. As with example 3 and FIG. 15 these cuts are viewed in cross section and thus it is understood that they are opposite sides of generally annular ring shaped cuts, which essentially follow the shape of the lens and which encompasses the central zone 1622. There are thus 5 partial cuts depicted in FIG. 16.


EXAMPE 5 provides a laser shot pattern for a finer detailed cutting of the lens to approximate the structural boundaries at 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 suture branches, or the use of six shells. Thus, there is shown in FIG. 17 seven essentially concentric shot patterns 1702-1708, which create seven corresponding shell cuts and which also create six corresponding shells 1709-1714. The outer surface 1701 of a 45-year old lens as measured is also provided in FIG. 17. While this example provides for the creation of six shells, it is understood that the lens contains thousands of fiber layers and that it may be desirable to utilize much greater than six shells and up to hundreds or even thousands, depending on the resolution of the laser deliver system and laser beam parameters.


Examples 6-12 relate to the volumetric removal of lens material in a predetermined shape, based upon a precise shot pattern. Thus, these examples illustrate how refractive change by shaped volumetric reduction may be accomplished. This approach recognizes a limitation of photodissruption laser beam delivery, i.e., that the gas bubbles created are considerably larger then the resultant material void found after all gas bubble dissipation occurs. This can have the effect of causing material voids to be spaced further apart than ideal for high efficiency volume removal. Thus, it is recognized that the closest spacing attainable, depending on detailed laser spot size, energy and pulse width, may provide a low, net volumetric removal efficiency, which is the ratio of achieved volume removal to the volume of material treated. A simple example considers a void size equal to the spacing between voids yielding a nominal 50% linear efficiency, which from symmetric geometry has a 25% area efficiency and a corresponding 12.5% volumetric efficiency of void creation. Thus, by way of example an approach is provided whereby the treatment shaped volume is proportionally larger than desired shaped volume removal to compensate for the low volume efficiency. In other words, if a large shape change with low volume removal efficiency is attempted then a small shape change should be achieved. Other effects such as void shape, asymmetries, void location, tissue compliance as a function of age, external forces and more, may effect the final volume efficiency and experimental validation of volumetric efficiency may be required.


EXAMPLE 6 provides a shot pattern and volume removal to make a negative refractive change, or reduce the power in the crystalline lens by 3 Diopters, using the Gullstrand-LaGrand optical model, which would require the removal of approximately 180 μm centrally tapering to 0 over a 3 mm radius. As illustrated in FIG. 18 there is provided an outer lens surface 1801 and a shot pattern 1802 for the desired volume removal. To achieve the full 3 Diopters refractive change directly, the shot pattern would have to remove essentially 100% of the shaded region volume which is extremely difficult due to low volume efficiency found in photodissruption laser beam delivery.


EXAMPLE 7, is based upon dealing with low volume removal efficiency and in this example the assumption that we have a volumetric efficiency of 12.5% or ⅛th we would treat an 8 times larger volume or 1.44 mm thick to compensate for the low volume efficiency, tapering to 0 over the same 3 mm as shown in FIG. 19, which illustrates a lens outer surface 1901 and a shot pattern 1902. As with the prior examples the shape of the shot pattern is based upon and essentially follows the shape of the outer surface 1901 of the lens.


EXAMPLE 8 provides a shot pattern to cause a refractive change to increase lens power or reduce hyperopia in patients, where the shot pattern is primarily implemented in the anterior region of the lens. This pattern is illustrated in FIG. 20, which provides an outer surface 2001 and thus shape of the lens and a shot pattern 2002.


EXAMPLE 9 provides a shot pattern to cause a refractive change to increase lens power or reduce hyperopia in patients, where the algorithm is primarily implemented in the posterior region of the lens. This pattern is illustrated in FIG. 21, which provides an outer surface 2101 and thus shape of the lens and a shot pattern 2102. This example further illustrates a shot pattern having a shape is modified to primarily follow the posterior curve of the lens.


EXAMPLE 10 provides a shot pattern to cause a refractive change to increase lens power or reduce hyperopia in patients, where the shot pattern is primarily implemented in the central region of the lens. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 22, there is provided an outer surface 2201 of the lens and a shot pattern 2202, which provides a volumetric shape. It further being noted that the anterior shape of the lens or posterior shape of the lens or both can be utilized to determine the shape of the shot pattern and/or volumetric shape.


EXAMPLE 11 provides two volumetric shot patterns that follow the shape of the lens surface to which they are adjacent. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 23, there is provided an outer surface 2301 and thus shape of the lens and a shot pattern having two volumetric shot patterns; a first shot pattern 2302 positioned in the anterior region of the lens and a second shot pattern 2303 positioned in the posterior region, which patterns provide a volumetric shape. Thus, the volumetric shapes to be removed from the lens are located in the anterior and posterior regions of the lens and have a surface that follows the anterior and posterior shape of the lens respectively.


EXAMPLE 12 illustrates a manner in which different shot pattern features are combined to address both refractive errors and those to increase flexibility utilizing a plurality of stacked partial shells, which are partially overlapping. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 24, there is provided an outer surface 2401 and thus shape of the lens and there are provided partial shell cuts 2402, whose extent is defined by a refractive shape, forming annular rings shaped partial shells 2403. The placement of the partial shell cuts are adjacent the anterior surface of the lens as shown it FIG. 24. The partial shell cuts may similarly be placed adjacent the posterior surface of the lens, in which case they should follow the shape of that surface. Thus, by precisely following the individual shape of the layers within the lens more effective cleaving is obtained.


The shot pattern in the figures associated with EXAMPLES 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 are shown to cut horizontal partial planes whose extent is defined by a refractive shape. It is to be understood that as an alternative to horizontal planes, vertical partial planes or other orientation cuts whose extent is defined by the refractive shape may be used.


Examples 13 and 14 are directed towards methods and shot patterns for treating and removal of cataracts and/or for clear lens extractions. Thus, there is provided a method for the structural modification of the lens material to make it easier to remove while potentially increasing the safety of the procedure by eliminating the high frequency ultrasonic energy used in Phaco emulsification today. In general, the use of photodissruption cutting in a specific shape patterns is utilized to carve up the lens material into tiny cube like structures small enough to be aspirated away with 1 to 2 mm sized aspiration needles.


EXAMPLE 13 provides a shot pattern to create 0.5 mm sized cubes out of the lens material following the structural shape of a 45-year old Burd Model lens. It is preferred that the patient's actual lens shape can be measured and used. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 25, there is provided an outer surface 2501 and thus an outer shape of the lens. There is further provided a shot pattern 2502 that creates grid like cuts, the end of which cuts 2503 essentially follows the shape of the lens. There is further provided one shell cut 2504, which is integral with the grid like cuts. The sequence of laser shots in the pattern in FIG. 25 may be executed from posterior to anterior, as in most of the patterns disclosed herein, to obtain more predictable results by reducing the variation caused by shooting through gas bubbles. However, it may be desirable to shoot cataracts from the anterior to the posterior for the purpose of choosing the lesser of two undesirable effects. Thus, it may be advantageous to shoot through the gas bubbles, or let them dissipate, rather then shooting through cataractus tissue, which much more severely scatters the light and more quickly prevents photodissruption compared to gas bubble interference. Accordingly, it is proposed to photodissrupt the most anterior sections of the cataract first, then move posteriorally, shooting through gas bubble remnants of cataractous tissue, to the next layer of cataract tissue below. In addition to shooting the laser in anterior z planes then moving posterior, it is further provided to essentially drill down anterior to posterior, which we call the z axis throughout this document and then move in x/y and drill down again.


EXAMPLE 14 provides for a clear lens extraction. In this example the shot pattern of FIG. 25 is applied to a clear lens and that lens material is subsequently removed. In this example shooting from posterior to anterior is desirable.


EXAMPE 15 provides for a precision capsulorhexis. The creation of precise capsulorhexis for the surgeon to access the lens to remove the lens material is provided. As illustrated in FIGS. 30 A-D, there is provided an outer surface 3001 and thus an outer shape of the lens. There is further provided a ring shaped band shape cut 3002 and shot pattern. Thus, the figure shows the cross section view of this ring shaped annular band and accordingly provides for two sides 3002 of the ring. The ring shaped capsulorhexis cuts of 100 μm deep, approximately centered on the anterior lens capsule surface and precisely 5 mm in diameter. Since the lens capsule is approximately 5 to 15 μm thick, it is desirable for the depth of the cut to be typically between 5 and several hundred um, although there is not much penalty for cutting several millimeters. This diameter, however, can be varied between 0.1 mm to 9 mm diameter and the capsulorhexis can be elliptical with the x axis different then the y axis or other shapes. A particular IOL may benefit from and/or may require a particular capsulorhexis shape.


Examples 16 to 17 relate to gradient index modification of the lens. Moffat, Atchison and Pope, Vision Research 42 (2002) 1683-1693, showed that the natural crystalline lens contains a gradient index of refraction behavior that follows the lens shells structure and dramatically contributes to overall lens power. They also showed that this gradient substantially diminishes, or flattens as the lens ages reducing the optical power of the lens. The loss of gradient index with age most likely explains the so-called Lens Paradox, which presents the conundrum that the ageing lens is known to grow to a steeper curvature shape that should result in higher power, yet the aging lens has similar power to the youthful lens. Essentially it is postulated that the increase in power due to shape changes is offset by the power loss from gradient index loss. Examples of the youthful vs old age gradient index behavior is shown in FIG. 31, which provides data taken from the more recent work from the same group Jones, Atchison, Meder and Pope, Vision Research 45 (2005) 2352-236. We can see from this figure that the old lens 3101 has a flat index behavior radially 3102 and the young lens 3103 has continuously diminishing index radially 3104 from approximately 1.42 in the center to 1.38 nearer the outer shells of the lens. Thus, based upon this data it is provided to use the photodissruptive laser in the creation of small voids within the lens fiber material which will then fill-in with aqueous humor fluid which has a lower index of refraction and, via area weighting or volume weighting, decrease the net refractive index of a particular region. Accordingly, if different void densities are placed in nested shell volumes, then this would diminish the average index of refraction of essentially concentric regions in a similar manner to the youthful lens.


EXAMPLE 16 provides a gradient index modification, which has different void densities placed in nested volumes, as shown in FIG. 26. Thus, there is provided a series of nested shot patterns 2602 and a lens outer surface 2601, with each pattern creating an incrementally different void density in the lens material. For example, if a nominal 25% weighting efficiency was obtained in the most densely treated region, filling that volume with 1.38 index of aqueous humor, and the remaining region that was 75% lens material of index 1.42, then the average resultant index of refraction would be 0.25*1.38+0.75*1.42 or 1.41, which we see from FIG. 31, that would restore the gradient from the center to a 2 mm radius, which is most central optical region for visual function. Thus, FIG. 26 shows a distributed regional treatment of increasing density from the center of the lens to the periphery of the lens.


EXAMPLE 17 provides a gradient index modification that is similar to example 16, except that the area where void density is changed is located further from the outer surface of the lens. This example and pattern is illustrated in FIG. 27. Thus there is provided a series of nested shot patterns 2702 and lens outer surface 2701, with each pattern creating an incrementally different void density in the lens material. Moreover, this figure shows a distributed regional shell treatment that is primarily confined to the nucleus.


EXAMPLE 18 provides for the cutting in relation to suture lines. Thus, cuts along either modeled suture lines, according to Kuzak described suture locations as a function of shell geometry with age and shape, or measured suture lines may be used. The latter being provided by the measuring of patient lens sutures with a CCD camera and aligning suture cuts to the measured locations of suture lines. Thus, the brightest suture lines and or those with the widest spatial distribution likely belong to the deepest layers, and perhaps the initial Y suture branches found in the fetal nucleus. Further, there it is provided to cut Y suture shapes at the lowest layers in the lens and then increasing the number of cuts as the layers move out peripherally. Thus, according to these teachings, FIGS. 28 & 29 shows three different cutting patterns 2801, 2802, 2803 in the anterior portion of the lens that can be done separately or in combination. Thus, FIGS. 28 A, C & E shows x-y cuts 2801, 2802, 2803 looking down at the anterior side of the lens. FIGS. 28 B, D, and F are schematic representation to illustrate that the star shaped patterns follow the shape of the layer of the lens and do not show the actual cut. FIG. 29 is the combination of the illustrations in FIGS. 28 B, D, and F to show their relative positions. It is understood that similar suture cuts can be made in the posterior following the posterior shell curves there, based again on either modeled geometry or measured lens data. There is yet further provided cutting 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 branch sutures per Kuszak., cut separately or in any combination.


The components and their association to one another for systems that can perform, in whole or in part, these examples are set forth above in detail. Additionally, it is noted that the functions of the methods and systems disclosed herein may be performed by a single device or by several devices in association with each other. Accordingly, based upon these teachings a system for performing these examples, or parts of these examples, may include by way of illustration and without limitation a laser, an optical system for delivering the laser beam, a scanner, a camera, an illumination source, and an applanator. These components are positioned so that when the eye is illuminated by the illumination source, light will travel from the eye through the applanator to the scanner. In this system the illumination source is movable with respect to the eye to provide varying angles by which the eye can be illuminated.


Similarly, such system may also include by way of example and without limitation a laser, a system for determining the position and shape of components of an eye, a camera, a controller (which term refers to and includes without limitation processors, microprocessors and/or other such types of computing devices that are known to those of skill in the art to have the capabilities necessary to operate such a system), an illumination source, and an eye interface device. In this system the scanner is optically associated with the eye interface device, such that when the eye is illuminated by the illumination source, light will travel from the eye through the eye interface device to the scanner. The scanner is further optically associated with the camera, such that the scanner has the capability to provide stereo pairs of images of the eye to the camera. The camera is associated with the controller and is capable of providing digital images of the eye to the controller; and, the controller further has the capability to determine, based in part upon the digital images provided from the camera, the shape, position and orientation of components of the eye.


Moreover, such systems may also include by way of example and without limitation a system for delivering a laser to an eye. This system would have a laser, a scanner, a camera, an illumination source, an eye interface device, a means for determining the shape and position of components within an eye and a means for directing the delivery of a laser beam from the laser to a precise three dimensional coordinate with respect to the components of the eye, the means for directing the delivery of the laser beam having the capability to direct the beam based at least in part on the determination of the shape and position of components within the eye by the determining means.


From the foregoing description, one skilled in the art can readily ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and/or modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usages and conditions.

Claims
  • 1. A system for treating conditions of a natural crystalline lens comprising: a laser that generates a laser beam of a predetermined wavelength;optics that receives the laser beam and alters the laser beam so that the altered laser beam is delivered to a predetermined volume of a portion of a natural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye, the optics comprising: laser focusing optics that alters the laser beam so as to have a predetermined spot size at the predetermined volume;a scanner that receives the altered laser beam and directs the altered laser beam to the predetermined volume;a means for determining a position of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the means for determining is in optical communication with the scanner; anda control system that is in electrical communication with the laser and the scanner, wherein the control system controls operation of the laser and the scanner so that the altered laser beam with the predetermined spot size is delivered to the predetermined volume based on the determined position and a predetermined natural crystalline lens shot pattern, wherein the predetermined wavelength and predetermined spot size are such that the altered laser beam travels entirely through a cornea of the eye without significantly affecting the cornea prior to being delivered to the predetermined volume.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for determining the position of the natural crystalline lens comprises a scanned laser illumination source.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for determining the position of the natural crystalline lens comprises dual cameras.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for determining the position of the natural crystalline lens comprises a structured light source and a camera.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for determining the position of the natural crystalline lens comprises a structured light source, a structured light source camera, and dual cameras.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the predetermined natural crystalline lens shot pattern will result in the formation of cut that generally follows a shape of a suture layer of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the cut is selected from the group consisting of a shell cut, a partial shell cut and a laser suture cut.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the predetermined natural crystalline lens shot pattern will result in the formation of a star pattern on the lens.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the star pattern, wherein a number of legs in the star pattern increases as their placement moves away from a center of the lens.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the altered laser beam at the predetermined volume produces photodisruption.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the means for determining a position comprises determining a relative distance between the laser and portions of the lens.
  • 11. A system for treating conditions of a natural crystalline lens comprising: a laser that generates a laser beam of a predetermined wavelength;optics that receives the laser beam and alters the laser beam so that the altered laser beam is delivered to a predetermined volume of a portion of a natural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye, the optics comprising: laser focusing optics that alters the laser beam so as to have a predetermined spot size at the predetermined volume;a scanner that receives the altered laser beam and directs the altered laser beam to the predetermined volume;a scanned laser illumination source that is in optical communication with the scanner and determines a position of the natural crystalline lens;a control system that is in electrical communication with the laser and the scanner, wherein the control system controls operation of the laser and the scanner so that the altered laser beam with a predetermined spot size is delivered to the predetermined volume based on the determined position and a predetermined partial shell cut pattern, which follows a shape of a layer of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the predetermined wavelength is such that the altered laser beam travels entirely through a cornea of the eye without significantly affecting the cornea prior to being delivered to the predetermined volume.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the predetermined partial shell cut pattern will result in the formation of partial shell cut that generally follows a shape of a suture layer of the natural crystalline lens.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the altered laser beam at the predetermined volume produces photodisruption.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the means for determining a position comprises determining a relative distance between the laser and portions of the lens.
  • 15. A system for delivering a laser beam to a natural, crystalline lens of an eye comprising: a laser for producing a laser beam of a predetermined wavelength;an optical path for directing the laser beam from the laser so that the laser beam is delivered with a predetermined spot size to a predetermined volume of a portion of a natural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye;a scanner that receives the laser beam from the optical path and directs the laser beam to the predetermined volume;a means for determining a position of the natural crystalline lens, the means for determining comprising a scanned laser illumination source and a camera that are in optical communication with the scanner;a control system that is in electrical communication with the laser and the scanner, wherein the control system controls operation of the laser and the scanner so that the laser beam with a predetermined spot size is focused at the predetermined volume based on the determined position, wherein the predetermined wavelength and predetermined spot size are such that the laser beam travels entirely through a cornea of the eye without significantly affecting the cornea prior to being focused at the predetermined volume of the portion of the natural crystalline lens.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the laser beam at the predetermined volume produces photodisruption.
  • 17. The system of claim 15, wherein the means for determining a position comprises determining a relative distance between the laser and portions of the lens.
  • 18. A system for delivering a laser beam to a natural crystalline lens of an eye comprising: a laser for producing a laser beam of a predetermined wavelength;focusing optics for directing the laser beam from the laser so that the laser beam is delivered with a predetermined spot size and to a predetermined volume of a portion of a natural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye;a scanner that receives the laser beam from the focusing optics and directs the laser beam to the predetermined volume;a means for determining a shape of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the means for determining is in optical communication with the scanner; anda control system that is in electrical communication with the laser and the scanner, wherein the control system controls operation of the laser and the scanner so that the laser beam is delivered and focused at the predetermined volume based on the determined shape and a pattern of shots, the shot pattern based in part upon a geometry of a natural human lens, wherein the predetermined wavelength is such that the laser beam travels entirely through a cornea of the eye without significantly affecting the cornea prior to being delivered to the natural crystalline lens.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the means for determining the shape of the natural crystalline lens comprises a scanned laser illumination source.
  • 20. The system of claim 18, wherein the means for determining the shape of the natural crystalline lens comprises dual cameras.
  • 21. The system of claim 18, wherein the means for determining the shape of the natural crystalline lens comprises a structured light source and a camera.
  • 22. The system of claim 18, wherein the means for determining the shape of the natural crystalline lens comprises a structured light source, a structured light source camera, and dual cameras.
  • 23. The system of claim 18, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the pattern of shots will result in the formation of cut that generally follows a shape of a suture layer of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the cut is selected from the group consisting of a shell cut, a partial shell cut and a laser suture cut.
  • 24. The system of claim 18, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the pattern of shots will result in the formation of a star pattern on the lens.
  • 25. The system of claim 24, wherein the star pattern, wherein a number of legs in the star pattern increases as their placement moves away from a center of the lens.
  • 26. The system of claim 18, wherein the laser beam at the predetermined volume produces photodisruption.
  • 27. A system for delivering laser beams to a natural crystalline lens of an eye comprising: a laser for producing a therapeutic laser beam of a predetermined wavelength; focusing optics for altering the therapeutic laser beam so that the therapeutic laser beam is delivered with a predetermined spot size to a predetermined volume of a portion of anatural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye; and a scanner that scans the altered therapeutic laser beam;a laser illumination source for producing an illumination laser beam, wherein the illumination laser beam is scanned by the scanner;a means for determining a position of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the means for determining is in optical communication with the scanner; anda control system for directing the therapeutic laser beam to the natural crystalline lens of the eye based on a predetermined shot pattern and the determined position, wherein the predetermined wavelength and spot size of the therapeutic laser beam are such that the therapeutic laser beam travels entirely through a cornea of the eye without significantly affecting the cornea prior to being delivered to the predetermined volume of the portion of the natural crystalline lens.
  • 28. The system of claim 27, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the predetermined shot pattern will result in the formation of cut that generally follows a shape of a suture layer of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the cut is selected from the group consisting of a shell cut, a partial shell cut and a laser suture cut.
  • 29. The system of claim 27, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the predetermined shot pattern will result in the formation of a star pattern on the lens.
  • 30. The system of claim 29, wherein the star pattern, wherein a number of legs in the star pattern increases as their placement moves away from a center of the lens.
  • 31. The system of claim 27, wherein the laser beam at the predetermined volume produces photodisruption.
  • 32. A system for treating conditions of a natural crystalline lens comprising: a laser that generates a laser beam of a predetermined wavelength;laser focusing optics that receives the laser beam and alters the laser beam so that the altered laser beam is delivered with a predetermined spot size to a predetermined volume of a portion of a natural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye, the optics comprising;a means for determining the position of the natural crystalline lens;a means for determining the shape of the natural crystalline lens;a control system that is in electrical communication with the laser and the scanner, wherein the control system controls operation of the laser and the laser focusing optics so that the altered laser beam with the predetermined spot size is delivered to the predetermined volume based on the determined position and shape of the lens and a predetermined natural crystalline lens shot pattern, wherein the predetermined wavelength and predetermined spot size are such that the altered laser beam travels entirely through a cornea of the eye without significantly affecting the cornea prior to being delivered to the predetermined volume.
  • 33. The system of claim 32, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the predetermined natural crystalline lens shot pattern will result in the formation of cut that generally follows a shape of a suture layer of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the cut is selected from the group consisting of a shell cut, a partial shell cut and a laser suture cut.
  • 34. The system of claim 32, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the predetermined natural crystalline lens shot pattern will result in the formation of a star pattern on the lens.
  • 35. The system of claim 34, wherein the star pattern, wherein a number of legs in the star pattern increases as their placement moves away from a center of the lens.
  • 36. The system of claim 32, wherein the altered laser beam at the predetermined volume produces photodisruption.
  • 37. The system of claim 32, wherein the means for determining a position comprises determining a relative distance between the laser and portions of the lens.
  • 38. A system for delivering a laser beam to a natural crystalline lens of an eye comprising: a laser for producing a laser beam of a predetermined wavelength;an optical path for directing the laser beam from the laser so that the laser beam is delivered with a predetermined spot size to a predetermined volume of a portion of a natural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye;a scanner that receives the laser beam from the optical path and directs the laser beam to the predetermined volume;a means for determining a position of the natural crystalline lens, the means for determining comprising a structured light source, a structured light source camera, and dual cameras that are in optical communication with the scanner; anda control system that is in electrical communication with the laser and the scanner, wherein the control system controls operation of the laser and the scanner so that the laser beam with a predetermined spot size is focused at the predetermined volume based on the determined position, wherein the predetermined wavelength and predetermined spot size are such that the laser beam travels entirely through a cornea of the eye without significantly affecting the cornea prior to being focused at the predetermined volume of the portion of the natural crystalline lens.
  • 39. The system of claim 38, wherein the altered laser beam at the predetermined volume produces photodisruption.
  • 40. The system of claim 38, wherein the means for determining a position comprises determining a relative distance between the laser and portions of the lens.
  • 41. A system for delivering a laser to a natural crystalline lens of an eye and for determining a position of the natural crystalline lens of the eye comprising: a patient support that ensures an eye of a patient is held in a substantially constant location;a laser that generates a laser beam of a predetermined wavelength;optics that receives the laser beam and alters the laser beam so that the altered laser beam is delivered with a predetermined spot size to a predetermined volume of a portion of a natural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye;a simulated structured illumination light source for determining a position and shape of the natural crystalline lens;a control system that is in electrical communication with the laser, wherein the control system controls operation of the laser so that the laser beam with a predetermined spot size is focused at the predetermined volume based on the determined position and shape and a predetermined pattern, wherein the predetermined wavelength and predetermined spot size are such that the laser beam travels entirely through a cornea of the eye without significantly affecting the cornea prior to being focused at the predetermined volume of the portion of the natural crystalline lens.
  • 42. The system of claim 41, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the predetermined pattern will result in the formation of cut that generally follows a shape of a suture layer of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the cut is selected from the group consisting of a shell cut, a partial shell cut and a laser suture cut.
  • 43. The system of claim 41, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the predetermined pattern will result in the formation of a star pattern on the lens.
  • 44. The system of claim 43, wherein the star pattern, wherein a number of legs in the star pattern increases as their placement moves away from a center of the lens.
  • 45. The system of claim 41, wherein the altered laser beam at the predetermined volume produces photodisruption.
  • 46. The system of claim 41, wherein the simulated structure illumination light source determines a relative distance between the laser and portions of the lens.
  • 47. A system for treating conditions of a natural crystalline lens comprising: a laser system that generates a laser beam of a predetermined wavelength and predetermined spot size when delivered to a predetermined volume of a portion of a natural crystalline lens of the eye that is separate from a cornea of the eye;a scanner that receives the laser beam from the laser system and directs the laser beam to the predetermined volume;a measurement device in optical communication with the scanner, wherein the measurement device determines positions for each portion of the lens by determining relative distances for each portion of the lens with respect to the laser;a control system that is in electrical communication with the laser system and the scanner, wherein the control system automatically controls operation of the laser system and scanner so that the laser beam with the predetermined spot size is delivered to the predetermined volume based on the determined position, wherein the predetermined wavelength and predetermined spot size are such that the laser beam travels entirely through a cornea of the eye without significantly affecting the cornea prior to being delivered to the predetermined volume.
  • 48. The system of claim 47, wherein the measurement device comprises a scanned laser illumination source.
  • 49. The system of claim 47, wherein the measurement device comprises dual cameras.
  • 50. The system of claim 47, wherein the measurement device comprises a structured light source and a camera.
  • 51. The system of claim 47, wherein the measurement device comprises a structured light source, a structured light source camera, and dual cameras.
  • 52. The system of claim 47, wherein the control system automatically controls operation of the laser system and scanner so that the laser beam with the predetermined spot size is delivered to the predetermined volume based on a shot pattern of the natural crystalline lens.
  • 53. The system of claim 52, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the shot pattern will result in the formation of cut that generally follows a shape of a suture layer of the natural crystalline lens, wherein the cut is selected from the group consisting of a shell cut, a partial shell cut and a laser suture cut.
  • 54. The system of claim 52, wherein having the laser beam directed to all portions of the shot pattern will result in the formation of star pattern on the lens.
  • 55. The system of claim 54, wherein the star pattern, wherein a number of legs in the star pattern increasing as their placement moves away from a center of the lens.
  • 56. The system of claim 47, wherein the laser beam at the predetermined volume produces photodisruption.
  • 57. A laser system for treating structures of an eye, the laser system comprising: a. a laser that generates a therapeutic laser beam;b. an optical assembly that receives, directs and focuses the therapeutic laser beam to a predetermined location associated with the laser system;c. the optical assembly comprising a z-focus device and an x, y scanner;d. the optical assembly and laser defining a therapeutic laser beam delivery path;e. a position determination assembly comprising: i. a light source to provide an illumination beam;ii. an x, y scanner;iii. focusing optics a;iv. an image capture device for providing observed data;v. the processor associated with the image capture device and capable of performing calculations, whereby the image capture device provides the observed data to the processor; and,vi. wherein the light source, the x, y, scanner of the position determination assembly, the focusing optics of the position determination assembly, and the image capture device define an illumination beam path;f. the processor associated with a numerical model; and,g. the processor capable of determining a position for a structure of the eye based upon the numerical model and the observed data.
  • 58. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the light source is a coherent light source.
  • 59. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the light source is a structured light source.
  • 60. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the light source is a structured coherent light source.
  • 61. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the light source is a coherent light source having a short coherence length.
  • 62. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the light source is a laser diode.
  • 63. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the light source is an infrared laser diode.
  • 64. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the light source is a scanned infrared laser diode, whereby the scanned infrared laser diode defines a structured light source.
  • 65. The laser system of claim 57, wherein at least a portion of the therapeutic laser beam delivery path and a portion of the illumination beam path are coincident.
  • 66. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the numerical model is based upon a Kuszak aged lens model.
  • 67. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the numerical model is a Kuszak aged lens model.
  • 68. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the numerical model is a Burd model.
  • 69. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the numerical model comprises an algorithm having coefficients based upon positions of a structure on the eye.
  • 70. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the image capture device comprises a camera.
  • 71. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the image capture device comprises a Scheimpflug camera.
  • 72. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the predetermined location is coincident with the determined position for a structure of the eye.
  • 73. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the predetermined location is based upon the determined position for a structure of the eye.
  • 74. The laser system of claim 73, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye.
  • 75. The laser system of claim 73, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 76. The laser system of claim 73, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 77. The laser system of claim 73, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 78. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 79. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye, wherein the eye has a cataractous lens.
  • 80. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 81. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 82. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 83. The laser system of claim 57, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 84. A laser system for treating structures of an eye, the laser system comprising: a. a laser that generates a therapeutic laser beam;b. an optical assembly that receives, directs and focuses the therapeutic laser beam to a predetermined location associated with the laser system;c. the optical assembly comprising a z-focus device and an x, y scanner;d. the optical assembly and laser defining a therapeutic laser beam delivery path;e. a shape determination assembly comprising: i. a light source to provide an illumination beam;ii. an x, y scanner;iii. focusing optics;iv. an image capture device for providing observed data;v. the processor in communication with the image capture device and capable of performing calculations, whereby the image capture device provides the observed data to the processor; and,vi. wherein the light source, the x, y, scanner of the shape determination assembly, the focusing optics of the shape determination assembly, and the image capture device define an illumination beam path;f. the processor associated with a numerical model; and,g. the processor capable of determining a shape for a structure of the eye based upon the numerical model and the observed data.
  • 85. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the light source is a coherent light source.
  • 86. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the light source is a structured light source.
  • 87. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the light source is a structured coherent light source.
  • 88. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the light source is a coherent light source having a short coherence length.
  • 89. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the light source is a laser diode.
  • 90. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the light source is an infrared laser diode.
  • 91. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the light source is a scanned coherent light source.
  • 92. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the light source is a scanned infrared laser diode, whereby the scanned infrared laser diode defines a structured light source.
  • 93. The laser system of claim 84, wherein at least a portion of the therapeutic laser beam delivery path and a portion of the illumination beam path are coincident.
  • 94. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the numerical model is based upon a Kuszak aged lens model.
  • 95. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the numerical model is a Kuszak aged lens model.
  • 96. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the numerical model is based upon a Burd model.
  • 97. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the numerical model is a Burd model.
  • 98. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the numerical model comprises an algorithm having coefficients based upon positions of a structure on the eye.
  • 99. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the image capture device comprises a camera.
  • 100. The laser system of claim 99, wherein the camera is in a Scheimpflug configuration.
  • 101. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the predetermined location is coincident with the determined shape for the structure of the eye.
  • 102. The laser system of claim 84, wherein the predetermined location is based upon the determined shape for the structure of the eye.
  • 103. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye.
  • 104. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 105. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 106. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 107. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 108. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye, wherein the eye has a cataractous lens.
  • 109. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 110. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 111. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 112. The laser system of claim 102, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 113. A laser system for treating structures of an eye, the laser system comprising: a. a laser that generates a therapeutic laser beam;b. an optical assembly that receives, directs and focuses the therapeutic laser beam to a predetermined location associated with the laser system;c. the optical assembly comprising a z-focus device and an x, y scanner;d. the optical assembly and laser defining a therapeutic laser beam delivery path;e. a position and shape determination assembly comprising: i. a light source to provide an illumination beam;ii. an x, y scanner;iii. focusing optics;iv. an image capture device for providing observed data;v the processor in communication with the image capture device and capable of performing calculations, whereby the image capture device provides the observed data to the processor; and,vi. wherein the light source, the x, y, scanner of the position and shape determination assembly, the focusing optics of the position and shape determination assembly, and the image capture device define an illumination beam path;f. the processor associated with a numerical model; and,g. the processor capable of determining a shape and a position for a structure of the eye based upon the numerical model and the observed data.
  • 114. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the light source is a coherent light source.
  • 115. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the light source is a structured light source.
  • 116. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the light source is a structured coherent light source.
  • 117. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the light source is a coherent light source having a short coherence length.
  • 118. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the light source is a laser diode.
  • 119. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the light source is an infrared laser diode.
  • 120. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the light source is a scanned coherent light source.
  • 121. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the light source is a scanned infrared laser diode, whereby the scanned infrared laser diode beam defines a structured light source.
  • 122. The laser system of claim 113, wherein at least a portion of the therapeutic beam path and a portion of the illumination beam path are coincident.
  • 123. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the numerical model is based upon a Kuszak aged lens model.
  • 124. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the numerical model is a Kuszak aged lens model.
  • 125. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the numerical model is based upon a Burd model.
  • 126. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the numerical model is a Burd model.
  • 127. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the numerical model comprises an algorithm having coefficients based upon positions of a structure on the eye.
  • 128. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the image capture device comprises a camera.
  • 129. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the image capture device comprises a camera in a Scheimpflug configuration.
  • 130. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the predetermined location is coincident with the determined shape and position for the structure of the eye.
  • 131. The laser system of claim 113, wherein the predetermined location is based upon the determined shape and position for the structure of the eye.
  • 132. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye.
  • 133. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 134. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 135. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 136. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 137. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye, wherein the eye has a cataractous lens.
  • 138. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 139. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 140. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 141. The laser system of claim 131, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 142. A laser system for treating structures of an eye, the laser system comprising: a. a laser that generates a therapeutic laser beam;b. an optical assembly that receives, directs and focuses the therapeutic laser beam to a predetermined location associated with the laser system;c. the optical assembly comprising a z-focus device and an x, y scanner;d. the optical assembly and laser defining a therapeutic laser beam delivery path;e. a position determination assembly comprising: i. a light source to provide an illumination beam;ii. an x, y scanner;iii. focusing opticsiv. an image capture device for providing observed data;v. the processor associated with the image capture device and capable of performing calculations, whereby the image capture device provides the observed data to the processor; and,vi. wherein the light source, the x, y, scanner of the position determination assembly, the focusing optics of the position determination assembly, and the image capture device define an illumination beam path;f. the processor associated with a structural model; andg. the processor capable of determining a position for a structure of the eye based upon the structural model and the observed data.
  • 143. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the light source is a coherent light source.
  • 144. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the light source is a structured light source.
  • 145. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the light source is a coherent light source having a short coherence length.
  • 146. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the light source is a laser diode.
  • 147. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the light source is an infrared laser diode.
  • 148. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the light source is a scanned infrared laser diode, whereby the scanned infrared laser diode defines a structured light source.
  • 149. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the numerical model is based upon a Kuszak aged lens model.
  • 150. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the numerical model is a Kuszak aged lens model.
  • 151. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the image capture device comprises a camera.
  • 152. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the image capture device comprises a Scheimpflug camera.
  • 153. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the predetermined location is coincident with the determined position for a structure of the eye.
  • 154. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the predetermined location is based upon the determined position for a structure of the eye.
  • 155. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye.
  • 156. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 157. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 158. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 159. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 160. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye, wherein the eye has a cataractous lens.
  • 161. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 162. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 163. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 164. The laser system of claim 142, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 165. A laser system for treating structures of an eye, the laser system comprising: a. a laser that generates a therapeutic laser beam;b. an optical assembly that receives, directs and focuses the therapeutic laser beam to a predetermined location associated with the laser system;c. the optical assembly comprising a z-focus device and an x, y scanner;d. the optical assembly and laser defining a therapeutic laser beam delivery path;e. a shape determination assembly comprising: i. a light source to provide an illumination beam;ii. an x, y scanner;iii. focusing optics;iv. an image capture device for providing observed data;v. the processor associated with the image capture device and capable of performing calculations, whereby the image capture device provides the observed data to the processor; and,vi. wherein the light source, the x, y, scanner of the position determination assembly, the focusing optics of the position determination assembly, and the image capture device define an illumination beam path;f. the processor associated with a structural model; andg. the processor capable of determining a shape for a structure of the eye based upon the structural model and the observed data.
  • 166. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the light source is a coherent light source having a short coherence length.
  • 167. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the light source is a laser diode.
  • 168. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the light source is a scanned infrared laser diode, whereby the scanned infrared laser diode defines a structured light source.
  • 169. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the numerical model is based upon a Kuszak aged lens model.
  • 170. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the numerical model is a Burd model.
  • 171. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the image capture device comprises a camera.
  • 172. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the image capture device comprises a Scheimpflug camera.
  • 173. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the predetermined location is coincident with the determined position for a structure of the eye.
  • 174. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the predetermined location is based upon the determined position for a structure of the eye.
  • 175. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye.
  • 176. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 177. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 178. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 179. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 180. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cornea of the eye, wherein the eye has a cataractous lens.
  • 181. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 182. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises a posterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 183. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior capsule of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
  • 184. The laser system of claim 165, wherein the structure of the eye comprises an anterior surface of a cataractous natural crystalline lens of the eye.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation-in-part of pending application Frey et al. Ser. No. 11/337,127 filed Jan. 20, 2006, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. This application incorporates by reference Frey et al. Ser. No. 11/414,838, filed on the same date as the present application. The present invention relates to systems and apparatus for treating the structure of the natural human crystalline lens with a laser to address a variety of medical conditions such as presbyopia, refractive error and cataracts and combinations of these.

US Referenced Citations (537)
Number Name Date Kind
3074407 Moon et al. Jan 1963 A
3971382 Krasnov Jul 1976 A
3982541 L'Esperance, Jr. Sep 1976 A
4024852 L'Esperance et al. May 1977 A
4263893 Pavlak et al. Apr 1981 A
4306546 Heine et al. Dec 1981 A
4309998 Aron nee Rosa et al. Jan 1982 A
4334736 Herbert Jun 1982 A
4381007 Doss Apr 1983 A
4394144 Aoki Jul 1983 A
4403841 Lang et al. Sep 1983 A
4461294 Baron Jul 1984 A
4477159 Mizuno et al. Oct 1984 A
4502816 Creter, Jr. et al. Mar 1985 A
4517980 Tagnon May 1985 A
4537193 Tanner Aug 1985 A
4538608 L'Esperance, Jr. Sep 1985 A
4554917 Tagnon Nov 1985 A
4561436 Munnerlyn Dec 1985 A
4565197 Daly Jan 1986 A
4573778 Shapiro Mar 1986 A
4576160 Tanaka Mar 1986 A
4579430 Bille Apr 1986 A
4580559 L'sperance Apr 1986 A
4582405 Muller et al. Apr 1986 A
4583539 Karlin et al. Apr 1986 A
4588505 Walley et al. May 1986 A
4601037 McDonald Jul 1986 A
4601288 Myers Jul 1986 A
4607622 Fritch et al. Aug 1986 A
4628416 Dewey Dec 1986 A
4633866 Peyman et al. Jan 1987 A
4638801 Daly et al. Jan 1987 A
4644948 Lang et al. Feb 1987 A
4648400 Schneider et al. Mar 1987 A
4657013 Hoerenz et al. Apr 1987 A
4665913 L'Esperance, Jr. May 1987 A
4669466 L'Esperance, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4669839 Muchel Jun 1987 A
4682595 Hoerenz et al. Jul 1987 A
4686979 Gruen et al. Aug 1987 A
4686992 Dewey et al. Aug 1987 A
4702245 Schroder et al. Oct 1987 A
4702576 Magnante Oct 1987 A
4711540 Yoshino et al. Dec 1987 A
4711541 Yoshino et al. Dec 1987 A
4712543 Baron Dec 1987 A
4715703 Cornsweet et al. Dec 1987 A
4718418 L'Esperance, Jr. Jan 1988 A
4719912 Weinberg Jan 1988 A
4721379 L'Esperance Jan 1988 A
4724522 Belgorod Feb 1988 A
4729372 L'Esperance, Jr. Mar 1988 A
4729373 Peyman Mar 1988 A
4732148 L'Esperance, Jr. Mar 1988 A
4732460 Kele et al. Mar 1988 A
4736744 Koike et al. Apr 1988 A
4741612 Birngruber et al. May 1988 A
4744362 Gründler May 1988 A
4758081 Barnes Jul 1988 A
4765336 Blaha et al. Aug 1988 A
4770162 L'Esperance et al. Sep 1988 A
4770172 L'Esperance, Jr. Sep 1988 A
4770486 Wang et al. Sep 1988 A
4772116 Schroder et al. Sep 1988 A
4773414 L'Esperance, Jr. Sep 1988 A
4775361 Jacques et al. Oct 1988 A
4776687 Nakanishi et al. Oct 1988 A
4798204 L'Esperance, Jr. Jan 1989 A
4820264 Matsui et al. Apr 1989 A
4830483 Kohayakawa et al. May 1989 A
4832043 Ichihashi May 1989 A
4837857 Scheller et al. Jun 1989 A
4838266 Koziol et al. Jun 1989 A
4840175 Peyman Jun 1989 A
4846172 Berlin Jul 1989 A
4848340 Bille et al. Jul 1989 A
4854693 Ichihashi et al. Aug 1989 A
4856513 Muller Aug 1989 A
4862888 Yessik Sep 1989 A
4863261 Flammer Sep 1989 A
4865029 Pankratov Sep 1989 A
4865441 Reis Sep 1989 A
4866243 Sakane et al. Sep 1989 A
4870952 Martinez Oct 1989 A
4881808 Bille et al. Nov 1989 A
4883351 Weiss Nov 1989 A
4884884 Reis Dec 1989 A
4887019 Reis et al. Dec 1989 A
4887592 Loertscher Dec 1989 A
4891043 Zeimer et al. Jan 1990 A
4900143 Bessler et al. Feb 1990 A
4900145 Akiyama Feb 1990 A
4901718 Bille et al. Feb 1990 A
4902124 Roy, Sr. et al. Feb 1990 A
4903695 Warner et al. Feb 1990 A
4905711 Bennett et al. Mar 1990 A
4907586 Bille et al. Mar 1990 A
4911160 Thyzel Mar 1990 A
4911711 Telfair et al. Mar 1990 A
4917486 Raven et al. Apr 1990 A
4931053 L'Esperance, Jr. Jun 1990 A
4941093 Marshall et al. Jul 1990 A
4951663 L'Esperance, Jr. Aug 1990 A
4953969 Fedorov Sep 1990 A
4966577 Crosson et al. Oct 1990 A
4972836 Schenck et al. Nov 1990 A
4973330 Azema et al. Nov 1990 A
4976709 Sand Dec 1990 A
4988348 Bille Jan 1991 A
4994058 Raven et al. Feb 1991 A
5000561 Lawniczak et al. Mar 1991 A
5000751 Schroder et al. Mar 1991 A
5002571 O'Donnell, Jr. et al. Mar 1991 A
5013311 Nouri May 1991 A
5019074 Muller May 1991 A
5041134 O'Donnell Aug 1991 A
5048946 Sklar et al. Sep 1991 A
5049147 Danon Sep 1991 A
5054907 Sklar et al. Oct 1991 A
5057102 Tomioka et al. Oct 1991 A
5067951 Greve Nov 1991 A
5090798 Kohayakawa Feb 1992 A
5092863 Schanzlin Mar 1992 A
5094521 Jolson et al. Mar 1992 A
5098426 Sklar et al. Mar 1992 A
5102409 Balgorod Apr 1992 A
5108388 Trokel Apr 1992 A
5108412 Krumeich et al. Apr 1992 A
5112328 Taboada et al. May 1992 A
5116114 Nakamura et al. May 1992 A
5122135 Durr et al. Jun 1992 A
5123902 Muller et al. Jun 1992 A
5128509 Black et al. Jul 1992 A
5133708 Smith Jul 1992 A
5137530 Sand Aug 1992 A
5141506 York Aug 1992 A
5147349 Johnson et al. Sep 1992 A
5147352 Azema et al. Sep 1992 A
5152055 L'Esperance, III et al. Oct 1992 A
5152759 Parel et al. Oct 1992 A
5163934 Munnerlyn Nov 1992 A
5171242 Dewey et al. Dec 1992 A
5174021 L'Esperance, III et al. Dec 1992 A
5178635 Gwon et al. Jan 1993 A
5188631 L'Esperance, Jr. Feb 1993 A
5194948 L'Esperance, III et al. Mar 1993 A
5196006 Klopotek et al. Mar 1993 A
5196027 Thompson et al. Mar 1993 A
5201730 Easley et al. Apr 1993 A
5202708 Sasaki et al. Apr 1993 A
5203353 Easley et al. Apr 1993 A
5207668 L'Esperance, Jr. May 1993 A
5213092 Uram May 1993 A
5215104 Steinert Jun 1993 A
5217459 Kamerling Jun 1993 A
5219343 L'Esperance, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5219344 Yoder, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5222981 Werblin Jun 1993 A
5224942 Beuchat et al. Jul 1993 A
5226903 Mizuno Jul 1993 A
5246435 Bille et al. Sep 1993 A
5246436 Rowe Sep 1993 A
5257988 L'Esperance, Jr. Nov 1993 A
5258025 Fedorov et al. Nov 1993 A
5263950 L'Esperance, Jr. Nov 1993 A
5263951 Spears et al. Nov 1993 A
5275593 Easley et al. Jan 1994 A
5277911 Viegas et al. Jan 1994 A
5279298 Flower Jan 1994 A
5279611 McDonnell et al. Jan 1994 A
5281211 Parel et al. Jan 1994 A
5282798 Bruse et al. Feb 1994 A
5284477 Hanna et al. Feb 1994 A
5288293 O'Donnell, Jr. Feb 1994 A
5290272 Burstein et al. Mar 1994 A
5295989 Nakamura Mar 1994 A
5300020 L'Esperance, Jr. Apr 1994 A
5300061 Easley et al. Apr 1994 A
5300062 Ueno Apr 1994 A
5300063 Tano et al. Apr 1994 A
5300114 Gwon et al. Apr 1994 A
5304168 Sun Apr 1994 A
5304169 Sand Apr 1994 A
5311224 Enomoto May 1994 A
5312320 L'Esperance, Jr. May 1994 A
5312393 Mastel May 1994 A
5314422 Nizzola May 1994 A
5318047 Davenport et al. Jun 1994 A
5318560 Blount et al. Jun 1994 A
5323788 Silvestrini et al. Jun 1994 A
5324281 Muller Jun 1994 A
5325134 Kohayakawa Jun 1994 A
5334190 Seiler Aug 1994 A
5336215 Hsueh et al. Aug 1994 A
5336216 Dewey Aug 1994 A
5342351 Blaha et al. Aug 1994 A
5342370 Simon et al. Aug 1994 A
5345948 O'Donnell, Jr. Sep 1994 A
5346491 Oertli Sep 1994 A
5347329 Ota Sep 1994 A
5348551 Spears et al. Sep 1994 A
5350374 Smith Sep 1994 A
5354331 Schachar Oct 1994 A
5355181 Ashizaki et al. Oct 1994 A
5356407 Easley et al. Oct 1994 A
5356409 Nizzola Oct 1994 A
5360424 Klopotek Nov 1994 A
5364388 Koziol Nov 1994 A
5364390 Taboada et al. Nov 1994 A
5368590 Itoh Nov 1994 A
5370641 O'Donnell, Jr. Dec 1994 A
5372595 Gaasterland et al. Dec 1994 A
5374265 Sand Dec 1994 A
5376086 Khoobehi et al. Dec 1994 A
5391165 Fountain et al. Feb 1995 A
5395356 King et al. Mar 1995 A
5403307 Zelman Apr 1995 A
5408484 Weimel Apr 1995 A
5411501 Klopotek May 1995 A
5412561 Rosenshein et al. May 1995 A
5413555 McMahan May 1995 A
5423798 Crow Jun 1995 A
5423800 Ren et al. Jun 1995 A
5423801 Marshall et al. Jun 1995 A
5425727 Koziol Jun 1995 A
5425729 Ishida et al. Jun 1995 A
5425730 Luloh Jun 1995 A
5437657 Epstein Aug 1995 A
5437658 Muller et al. Aug 1995 A
5439462 Bille et al. Aug 1995 A
5441496 Easley et al. Aug 1995 A
5441511 Hanna Aug 1995 A
5442412 Frey et al. Aug 1995 A
5442487 Mizuno Aug 1995 A
5445633 Nakamura et al. Aug 1995 A
5460627 O'Donnell, Jr. Oct 1995 A
5461212 Seiler et al. Oct 1995 A
5462739 Dan et al. Oct 1995 A
5465737 Schachar Nov 1995 A
5470329 Sumiya Nov 1995 A
5474548 Knopp et al. Dec 1995 A
5476511 Gwon et al. Dec 1995 A
5480396 Simon et al. Jan 1996 A
5484432 Sand Jan 1996 A
5489299 Schachar Feb 1996 A
5503165 Schachar Apr 1996 A
5507740 O'Donnell, Jr. Apr 1996 A
5514124 Alpins May 1996 A
5514125 Lasser et al. May 1996 A
5520679 Lin May 1996 A
5527774 Girard Jun 1996 A
5529076 Schachar Jun 1996 A
5531753 Oliveira Jul 1996 A
5533997 Ruiz Jul 1996 A
5548352 Dewey Aug 1996 A
5549597 Shimmick et al. Aug 1996 A
5549632 Lai Aug 1996 A
5556395 Shimmick et al. Sep 1996 A
5573544 Simon et al. Nov 1996 A
5594753 Frey et al. Jan 1997 A
5607472 Thompson Mar 1997 A
5616139 Okamoto Apr 1997 A
5618284 Sand Apr 1997 A
5620435 Belkin et al. Apr 1997 A
5627162 Gwon et al. May 1997 A
5632742 Frey et al. May 1997 A
5651782 Simon et al. Jul 1997 A
5656186 Mourou et al. Aug 1997 A
5684560 Roffman et al. Nov 1997 A
5699142 Lee et al. Dec 1997 A
5709868 Perricone Jan 1998 A
5722952 Schachar Mar 1998 A
5722970 Colvard et al. Mar 1998 A
5731909 Schachar Mar 1998 A
5738677 Colvard et al. Apr 1998 A
5752950 Frey et al. May 1998 A
5757462 Nanjo May 1998 A
5766171 Silvestrini Jun 1998 A
5773472 Stjernschantz et al. Jun 1998 A
5828686 Frey et al. Oct 1998 A
5843184 Cionni Dec 1998 A
5849006 Frey et al. Dec 1998 A
5886768 Knopp et al. Mar 1999 A
5907908 Cunanan et al. Jun 1999 A
5912915 Reed et al. Jun 1999 A
5919186 Bath Jul 1999 A
5928129 Ruiz Jul 1999 A
5980513 Frey et al. Nov 1999 A
5984916 Lai Nov 1999 A
5993441 Muller et al. Nov 1999 A
6007578 Schachar Dec 1999 A
6013101 Israel Jan 2000 A
6019472 Koester et al. Feb 2000 A
6022088 Metzler Feb 2000 A
6027494 Frey Feb 2000 A
6050687 Bille et al. Apr 2000 A
6055259 Frey et al. Apr 2000 A
6059772 Hsia et al. May 2000 A
6070981 Mihashi et al. Jun 2000 A
6099522 Knopp et al. Aug 2000 A
6114651 Schluter et al. Sep 2000 A
6132424 Tang Oct 2000 A
6186148 Okada Feb 2001 B1
6190375 Frey Feb 2001 B1
6197018 O'Donnell Mar 2001 B1
6197056 Schachar Mar 2001 B1
6252595 Birmingham et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254595 Juhasz et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261220 Frey et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271914 Frey et al. Aug 2001 B1
6271915 Frey et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275718 Lempert Aug 2001 B1
6280435 Odrich et al. Aug 2001 B1
6280468 Schachar Aug 2001 B1
6299640 Schachar Oct 2001 B1
6302877 Ruiz Oct 2001 B1
6302879 Frey et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312422 Dubnack Nov 2001 B1
6312424 Largent Nov 2001 B1
6313165 Grunberger et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315773 Frey et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319274 Shadduck Nov 2001 B1
6322545 Schachar Nov 2001 B1
6322556 Gwon et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324191 Horvath Nov 2001 B1
6325791 Shimoji Dec 2001 B1
6325792 Swinger et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328732 Donitzky et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344040 Juhasz et al. Feb 2002 B1
6373571 Juhasz et al. Apr 2002 B1
D459806 Webb Jul 2002 S
D459807 Webb Jul 2002 S
6413262 Saishin et al. Jul 2002 B2
D462442 Webb Sep 2002 S
D462443 Webb Sep 2002 S
6451008 Frey et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460997 Frey et al. Oct 2002 B1
6467906 Alpins Oct 2002 B1
6493151 Schachar Dec 2002 B2
6494910 Ganem et al. Dec 2002 B1
6497483 Frey et al. Dec 2002 B2
6530917 Seiler et al. Mar 2003 B1
6544254 Bath Apr 2003 B1
6547394 Doherty Apr 2003 B2
6554825 Murray et al. Apr 2003 B1
6585726 Frey et al. Jul 2003 B2
6588902 Isogai Jul 2003 B2
6588903 Rathjen Jul 2003 B2
6592574 Shimmick et al. Jul 2003 B1
6610686 Enrico et al. Aug 2003 B1
6623476 Juhasz et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626445 Murphy et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626893 Frey et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626894 Frey et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626895 Frey et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626896 Frey et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626897 Frey et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626898 Frey et al. Sep 2003 B2
6648877 Juhasz et al. Nov 2003 B1
6669342 Lieberman et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676653 Juhasz et al. Jan 2004 B2
6693927 Horvath et al. Feb 2004 B1
6702853 Peyman Mar 2004 B1
6726679 Dick et al. Apr 2004 B1
6849091 Cumming Feb 2005 B1
6863667 Webb et al. Mar 2005 B2
6905641 Platt et al. Jun 2005 B2
6923955 Till et al. Aug 2005 B2
6962583 Kadziauskas et al. Nov 2005 B2
7044568 Olivera et al. May 2006 B2
7077838 Wong Jul 2006 B2
7182759 Kadziauskas et al. Feb 2007 B2
7188949 Bandhauer et al. Mar 2007 B2
7220255 Lai May 2007 B2
7252662 McArdle et al. Aug 2007 B2
7264355 Rathjen Sep 2007 B2
RE40002 Lin Jan 2008 E
RE40184 Lin Mar 2008 E
7338167 Zelvin et al. Mar 2008 B2
7357504 Fischer et al. Apr 2008 B2
7364575 Van Saarloos Apr 2008 B2
7390089 Loesel et al. Jun 2008 B2
RE40420 Dick et al. Jul 2008 E
7402159 Loesel et al. Jul 2008 B2
7467871 Lawhorn et al. Dec 2008 B2
7479106 Banik et al. Jan 2009 B2
7540613 Severns Jun 2009 B2
7655002 Myers et al. Feb 2010 B2
7717908 Ruiz et al. May 2010 B2
7766903 Blumenkranz et al. Aug 2010 B2
7836894 Brinkmann et al. Nov 2010 B2
7959289 Cattin-Liebl Jun 2011 B2
8085408 Everett et al. Dec 2011 B2
8262553 Weston et al. Sep 2012 B2
8262646 Frey et al. Sep 2012 B2
8382745 Naranjo-Tackman et al. Feb 2013 B2
8465478 Frey et al. Jun 2013 B2
8475433 Mrochen et al. Jul 2013 B2
8480659 Frey et al. Jul 2013 B2
8500723 Frey et al. Aug 2013 B2
8556425 Frey et al. Oct 2013 B2
D694890 Bott et al. Dec 2013 S
D695408 Bott et al. Dec 2013 S
8617146 Naranjo-Tackman et al. Dec 2013 B2
8708491 Frey et al. Apr 2014 B2
8758332 Frey et al. Jun 2014 B2
8801186 Frey et al. Aug 2014 B2
20010029363 Lin Oct 2001 A1
20020004658 Munnerlyn et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020025311 Till Feb 2002 A1
20020029053 Gordon Mar 2002 A1
20020049437 Silvestrini Apr 2002 A1
20020049450 Myers Apr 2002 A1
20020103478 Gwon et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020110549 Till Aug 2002 A1
20020138139 Till Sep 2002 A1
20020140903 Schachar Oct 2002 A1
20020159028 Masaki Oct 2002 A1
20030050629 Kadziauskas et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055412 Lieberman et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030076508 Cornsweet Apr 2003 A1
20030109926 Portney Jun 2003 A1
20030135272 Brady et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030139737 Lin Jul 2003 A1
20030212387 Kurtz et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220630 Lin et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030236515 Lieberman et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040054359 Ruiz et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059321 Knopp et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040070761 Horvath et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040106929 Masket Jun 2004 A1
20040143244 Gray et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040156014 Piers et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040199149 Myers et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199150 Lai Oct 2004 A1
20040243111 Bendett et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249403 Loomas et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050107775 Huang et al. May 2005 A1
20050165387 Lubatschowski et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050192562 Loesel et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197655 Telfair et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203492 Nguyen et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050241653 Van Heugten et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050243276 Van Heugten et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050270486 Teiwes et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050286019 Wiltberger et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060058682 Miller et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060084956 Sumiya Apr 2006 A1
20060192921 Loesel et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195076 Blumenkranz et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060215111 Mihashi Sep 2006 A1
20060217688 Lai Sep 2006 A1
20060259022 Lin Nov 2006 A1
20070010803 Bischoff et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070078447 Weinacht et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093795 Melcher et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093796 Raksi et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070129693 Hunter et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070173794 Frey et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185475 Frey et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070265603 Pinelli Nov 2007 A1
20080058841 Kurtz et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071254 Lummis et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077121 Rathjen Mar 2008 A1
20080111972 Barth et al. May 2008 A1
20080114386 Iliakis et al. May 2008 A1
20080186551 Hanft et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080275433 Russmann et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281303 Culbertson et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281413 Culbertson et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080312675 Newcott et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090012507 Culbertson et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090069794 Kurtz Mar 2009 A1
20090088734 Mordaunt Apr 2009 A1
20090126870 Zadoyan et al. May 2009 A1
20090131921 Kurtz et al. May 2009 A1
20090137988 Kurtz May 2009 A1
20090137991 Kurtz May 2009 A1
20090137993 Kurtz May 2009 A1
20090157063 Ruiz Jun 2009 A1
20090161065 Smith, III et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090171327 Kurtz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177189 Raksi Jul 2009 A1
20090187178 Muller et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192389 Eilers et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090209954 Muller et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090244482 Elsner et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090281530 Korn Nov 2009 A1
20090287232 Davis Nov 2009 A1
20100002837 Gertner et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100004641 Frey et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100004643 Frey et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100022994 Frey et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100022995 Frey et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100022996 Frey et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100042079 Frey et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100060855 Graether Mar 2010 A1
20100114079 Myers et al. May 2010 A1
20100249761 Ruiz et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256614 Donitzky et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100256615 Blumenkranz et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274228 Mrochen et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100292676 Larsen Nov 2010 A1
20100292678 Frey et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100312231 Singh Dec 2010 A1
20100324542 Kurtz Dec 2010 A1
20100331829 Bor et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110022035 Porter et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022036 Frey et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110028950 Raksi et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040293 Bor Feb 2011 A1
20110092965 Slatkine et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110118712 Lubatschowski et al. May 2011 A1
20110137301 Bartoli Jun 2011 A1
20110149240 Alpins Jun 2011 A1
20110160710 Frey et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160711 Naranjo-Tackman et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110166557 Naranjo-Tackman et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110172649 Schuele et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184395 Schuele et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110187995 Frey et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110190739 Frey et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110190740 Frey et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110292340 Shimizu et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120016350 Myers et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120089134 Horvath et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120182522 Frey et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120229767 Alpins Sep 2012 A1
20120265181 Frey Oct 2012 A1
20120271286 Curatu et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120296321 Frey et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120330290 Gray et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130265542 Frey et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140066906 Frey et al. Mar 2014 A9
20140066908 Frey et al. Mar 2014 A9
20140155874 Naranjo-Tackman et al. Jun 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
2553963 Aug 2005 CA
2680072 Sep 2008 CA
10 2005 001 249 Jul 2006 DE
0 397 962 Nov 1990 EP
0 933 060 Aug 1999 EP
1 970 034 Sep 2008 EP
2 497 087 Jul 1982 FR
5-115437 May 1993 JP
WO 91-19539 Dec 1991 WO
WO 0113838 Mar 2001 WO
WO 03002010 Jan 2003 WO
WO 2005070358 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2006074469 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2008112292 Sep 2008 WO
WO 2008150330 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2010022745 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2012051490 Apr 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (370)
Entry
International Search Report dated Oct, 23, 2007 from related PCT application No. PCT/US07/01312, 1 page.
International Search Report dated Jan. 2, 2008 from related PCT application No. PCT/US07/01353, 1 page.
Akchurin, Garif et al., “Evaluation of the degree of turbidity if cataract lens and its correlation with retinal visual acuity”, SPIE, vol. 3591, 1999, pp. 74-81.
Al-Ghoul, Kristin J. et al., “Structural Evidence of Human Nuclear Fiber Compaction as a Function of Ageing and Cataractogenesis”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 72, 2001, pp. 199-214.
Ai-Ghoul, K. J. et al., “Distribution and Type of Morphological Damage in Human Nuclear Age-Related Cataracts”, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of North Carolina and Duke University Eye Center, 1996, pp. 237-251.
Alio, et al., “Crystalline Lens Optical Dysfunction through Aging”, Ophthalmology, vol. 112, No. 11, Nov. 2005, pp. 2022-2029.
Amann, Josef et al., “Increased Endothelial Cell Density in the Paracentral and Peripheral Regions of the Human Cornea”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2003, vol. 135, No. 5, pp. 584-590.
Amendt, M. Strauss et al., “Modeling of bubble dynamics in relation to medical applications”, SPIE, 1997, vol. 2975, pp. 362-373.
Ansari, Rafat R. et al., “Measuring lens opacity: combining quasi-elastic light scattering with Scheimpflug imaging system”, 1998, SPIE, vol. 3246, pp. 35-42.
Anschutz, Till, M.D., “Laser Correction of Hyperopia and Presbyopia”, Int Ophtalmol Clin, 1998, vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 107-137.
Apple, David J. et al., “Preparation and Study of Human Eyes Obtained Postmortem with the Miyake Posterior Photographic Technique”, Ophthalmology, 1990, vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 810-816.
Armstrong, Larry “A cataract Breakthrough May Be on the Way”, Business Week, Mar. 23, 1998, pp. 90-92.
Aston, Adam, “Why Settle for 20/20?”, Business Week, Mar. 17, 2003, pp. 95-96.
Azzam, Naiel et al., “Long-term lens organ culture system to determine age-related effects of UV irradiation on the eye lens”, Experimental Eye Research, 2004, vol. 79, pp. 903-911.
Back, Arthur P. et al., “Correction of Presbyopia with Contact Lenses: Comparative Success Rates with Three Systems”, Optometry & Vision Science, 1989, vol. 66, No. 8, pp. 518-525.
Balaram, Mini et al., Noncontact Specular Microscopy of Human Lens Epithelium, IOVS, 2000, vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 474-481.
Barak, Adiel et al., “Anterior capsulotomy using the CO2 laser”, SPIE, 1998, vol. 3246, pp. 196-198.
Bath, Patricia E. et al., “Endocapsular Excimer Laser Phakoablation Through a 1-mm Incision”, Opthalmic Laser Therapy, 1987, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 245-248.
Beers, A. P. A. et al. “Age-Related Changes in the Accommodation Mechanism”, Optometry and Vision Science, 1996, vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 235-242.
Beers, A. P. A. et al., “In Vivo Determination of the Biomechanical Properties of the Component Elements of the Accommodation Mechanism”, Vision Res., 1994, vol. 34, pp. 2897-2905.
Bellows, John G., M.D. et al., “B. Cataracta Complicata”.
Ben-Sira, I. et al., “Clinical method for measurement of light backscattering from the in vivo human lens”, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., V1980, ol. 19, No. 4, 1980, pp. 435-437.
Benjamin, William J., “Borish's Clinical Refraction”, W.B. Saunders, publishers, copyright 1998, p. 110.
Bettelheim, Frederick A. et al., “Syneretic Response of Aging Normal Human Lens to Pressure”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2003, vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 258-263.
Bigler, Emmanuel, “Depth of field and Scheimpflug's rule: a ”minimalist“ geometrical approach”, ENSMM, France, 2002, pp. 1-17.
Billie, J. F. et al., “3D Imaging of the Human Eye Using The laser Tomographic Scanner Lts”, Institue of Applied Sciences, University of Heidelburg, 2 pgs.
Bito, L.Z. et al., “Age-dependent loss of accommodative amplitude in rhesus monkeys: an animal model for presbyopia”, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 1982, vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 23-31.
Bor, Zs. PhD., et al., “Plume Emission, Shock Wave and Surface Wave Formation During Excimer Laser Ablation of the Cornea”, Supplement to Retroactive & Corneal Surgery, 1993, vol. 9, pp. S110-S115.
Borja, David et al., “Crystalline Lens MTF Measurement During Simulated Accommodation”, SPIE, 2005, vol. 5688, pp. 26-32.
Borkman, Raymond F. “Evidence for a Free Radical Mechanism in Aging and u.v.-Irradiated Ocular Lenses”, Exp. Eye Res., 1977, vol. 25, pp. 303-309.
Braham, Lewis, “Eye Surgery: It's Getting Sharper”, Business Week, Oct. 18, 2004, pp. 142-143.
Breitling, Detlef et al., “Fundamental aspects in machining of metals with short and ultrashort laser pulses”, SPIE, 2004, vol. 5339, pp. 1-15.
Bron, A.J., “The Ageing Lens”, Opthalmologics, 2000, vol. 214, pp. 86-104.
Brown, Nicholas, “Dating the onset of cataract”, Transactions of the Opthalmological Society of the United Kingdom, 1976, vol. 96, pp. 18-23.
Brown, Nicholas “The Change in Lens Curvature with Age”, Exp. Eye Res., 1974, vol. 19, pp. 175-183.
Brown, Nicholas “The Change in Shape and Internal Form of the Lens of the Eye on Accommodation”, Exp. Eye Res., 1973, vol. 15, pp. 441-459.
Burd, H.J. et al., “Can reliable values of Young's modulus be deduced from Fisher's (1971) spinning lens measurements?”, Vision Research, 2005, pp. 1-15.
Burd, H.J. et al., “Numerical modeling of the accommodating lens”, Vision Research, 2002, vol. 42, pp. 2235-2251.
Campbell, Melanie C. W., “Measurement of Refractive Index in an Intact Crystalline Lens”, Vision Res., 1984, vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 409-415.
Carey, James et al., “Propagation and Characterization of Ultrashort Laser Pulses”, Spectroscopy of Systems with Spatially Confined Structures, Ed. Rino Di Bartolo, Kluwer Academic Press, Netherlands, 2003, pp. 1-30.
Charles, M. W. et al., “Dimensions of the Human Eye Relevant to Radiation Protection”, Phys. Med. Biol., 1975, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 2002-218.
Chen, Wei-Li et al., Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Findings in Rabbit Eyes Undergoing Scleral Suction during Lamellar Refractive Surgery, IOVS, 2002, vol. 43, No. 12, pp. 3665-3672.
Claflin, E. S. et al., “Configuring an electrostatic membrane mirror by least-squares fitting with analytically derived influence functions”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A., 1986, vol. 3, No. 11, pp. 1833-1839.
Coleman, D. Jackson et al., “Presbyopia, Accommodation, and the Mature Catenary”, Ophthalmology, 2001, vol. 108, No. 9, pp. 1544-1551.
Cook, Christopher A. et al., “Aging of the Human Crystalline Lens and Anterior Segment”, Vision Res., vol. 34, No. 22, pp. 2945-2954.
Costagliola, Ciro et al., “ArF 193 nm Excimer Laser Corneal Surgery as a Possible Risk Factor in Cataractogenesis”, Exp. Eye Res.,1994, vol. 58, pp. 453-457.
Cotlier, Edward, M.D., “The Lens”, Adler's Physiology of the Eye, pp. 268-290.
Crawford, Kathryn S. et al., “The Role of the Iris in Accommodation of Rhesus Monkeys”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1990, vol. 31, No. 10, pp. 2185-2190.
Croft, Mary Ann et al., Accommodative Ciliary Body and Lens Function in Rhesus Monkeys, I: Normal Lens, Zonule and Ciliary Process Configuration in the Iridectomized Eye, IOVS, 2006, vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 1076-1086.
Croft, Mary Ann et al., “Accommodation and Presbyopia”, Int Ophthalmol Clin, vol. 41, pp. 33-46.
Croft, Mary Ann et al., “The Zonula, Lens, and Circumlental Space in the Normal Iridectomized Rhesus Monkey Eye”, IOVS, 2006, vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 1087-1095.
Croft, Mary Ann et al., “Accommodation and Presbyopia: The Ciliary Neuromuscular View”, Opthalmol Clin N Am, 2006, vol. 19, 2006, pp. 13-24.
Cromie, William J., “Laser Makes History's Fastest Holes”, The Harvard University Gazette, onatined from the Internet on Nov. 22, 1999 at: http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/10.07/laser.html, 6 pgs.
Czygan, G. et al., “Mechanical testing of isolated senile human eye lens nuclei”, Med. Eng. Phys., 1996, vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 345-349.
Datta, Debajyoti, “Tissue Surgery and Subcellular Photodisruption with Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, Thesis for Dept. of Physics, Harvard University, 2002, pp. 1-74.
Dausinger, Friedrich et al., “Micro-machining with ultrashort laser pulses: From basic understanding to technical applications”, SPIE, 2002, No. 5147, pp. 1-10.
Dholakia, Sheena A. et al., “Prospective evaluation of phacoemulsification in adults younger than 50 years”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, vol. 31, pp. 1327-1333.
Douven, Lucen F.A. et al., “Characterisation of Mechanical Behaviour of Human Skin in Vivo”, SPIE, 2000, vol. 3914, pp. 618-629.
Ehrmann, Klaus et al., “Evaluation of porcine crystalline lenses in comparison with molded polymer gel lenses with an improved ex vivo accommodation simulator”, SPIE, 2005, vol. 5688, pp. 240-251.
Ehrmann, Klaus et al., “Ex Vivo Accommodation Simulator II—Concept and Preliminary Results”, SPIE, 2004, vol. 5314, pp. 48-58.
El-Osta, Austen A.R. et al., “In vitro model for the study of human posterior capsule opacification”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, vol. 29, pp. 1593-1600.
Erpelding, Todd N. et al., “Bubble-Based Acoustic Radiation Force for Monitoring Intraocular Lens Elasticity”, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004, pp. 732-735.
Fagerholm, P.P., “The Response of the Lens to Trauma”, Trans. Ophtal. Soc. U. K., 1982 vol. 102, p. 375.
Farxsworth, P.N. et al., “Anterior Zonular Shifts with Age”, Exp. Eye Res., 1979, vol. 28, pp. 291-297.
Findl, Oliver et al., “Laserinterferometric Assessment of Pilocarpine-Induced Movement of an Accommodating Intraocular Lens—A Randomized Trial”, Ophthalmology, 2004, vol. 111, No. 8, pp. 1515-1521.
Fisher, R.F. et al., “Changes in lens fibres after damage to the lens capsule”, Lens Clinic, St. May's Hospital, London, 4 pgs.
Fisher, R.F., “Presbyopia and the Changes With Age In The Human Crystalline Lens”, J. Physiol., 1973, vol. 228, pp. 765-779.
Fisher, R.F., “The Force of Contraction of the Human Ciliary Muscle During Accommodation”, J. Physiol., 1977. vol. 270, pp. 51-74.
Fisher, R.F., “The Elastic Constants of The Human Lens”, J. Physiol. 1971, vol. 212, pp. 147-180.
Fisher, R. F. et al., “The elastic constants and ultrastructural organization of a basement membrane (lens capsule)”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1976, vol. 93, pp. 335-358.
Fisher, R. F., “The Mechanics of Accommodation in Relation to Presbyopia”, Eye, 1988, vol. 2, pp. 646-649.
Fisher, R. F., “The Ciliary Body in Accommodation”, Trans. Opthalmol. Soc. U.K. 1986. vol. 105, p. 208.
Fisher, R.F., “Elastic Constants of The Human Lens Capsule”, J. Physiol. (1969) vol. 201, pp. 1-19.
Fleck, Brian W. et al., “Q-switched Nd:YAG laser disruption of rabbit lens nucleus”, laser and Light in Ophthalmology, 1990, vol. 3. No. 3, pp. 227-232.
Foster, C. Stephen et al., “Smolin and Thoft's The Cornea: Scientific Foundations And Clinical Practice”, The New England Journal of Medicine, 2005, 353:23, 2 pgs.
Fujimoto, James et al., “Biomedical Optics”, Photonics West, SPIE, 2005, vol. 5686, pp. 23-70.
Garner, Margaret H. et al., “Selective oxidation of cysteine and methionine in normal and senile cataractous lenses”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1980, vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 1274-1277.
Gayen, Tapan K. et al., “Near-infrared laser welding of aortic and skin tissues and microscopic investigation of welding efficacy”, SPIE, 2003, vol. 4949, pp. 182-185.
Gershenzon, A. et al., “Clinical and Epidemiology—New software for lens retro-illumination digital image analysis”, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology, 1999, vol. 27, pp. 170-172.
Giblin, Frank J. et al., “Nuclear Light Scattering, Disulfide Formation and Membrane Damage in Lenses of Older Guinea Pigs Treated with Hyperbaric Oxygen”, Exp. Eye Res. (1995), vol. 60, pp. 219-235.
Gimbel, Howard V. et al., “Intrastromal Photorefractive Keratectomy with the Nd:YLF Laser”, Int Ophthalmol Clin., 1994, vol. 34. No. 4. pp. 139-145.
Glasser, Adrian et al., “Accommodative Changes in Lens Diameter in Rhesus Monkeys”, IOVS, 2006, vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 278-286.
Glasser, Adrian et al., “On modeling the causes of presbyopia”, Vision Research, 2001, vol. 41, pp. 3083-3087.
Glasser, Adrian et al., “Presbyopia and the Optical Changes in the Human Crystalline Lens with Age”, Vision Res., 1998, vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 209-229.
Glasser, Adrian et al., “Ultrasound Biomicroscopy of the Aging Rhesus Monkey Ciliary Region”, Optometry and Vision Science, 2001, vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 417-424.
Goodenough, Daniel A., “Lens gap junctions: a structural hypothesis for nonregulated low-resistance intercellular pathways”, Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., 1979, vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 1104-1122.
Grace, Jeffery M. et al., “Repetitively Pulsed Ruby Lasers As Light Sources for High-Speed Photography”, Optical Engineering, 1988, vol. 37, No. 8, pp. 1-26.
Gwon, Arlene et al., “Focal laser photophacoablation of normal and cataractous lenses in rabbits: Preliminary report”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 1995, vol. 21, pp. 282-286.
Habib, Maged S. et al., “Myopic Intrastromal Photorefractive Keratectomy With the Neodymium-Yttrium Lithium Fluoride Picosecond Laser in the Cat Cornea”, Arch Ophthalmol., 1995, vol. 113, pp. 499-505.
Hahn, D.W., “Dynamics of Ablation Plume Particles Generated During Excimer Laser Corneal Ablation”, Lasers in Surgey and Medicine, 1995, vol. 16, pp. 384-389.
Hamaoui, Marie et al., “Ex-vivo testing of crystalline lens substitutes: a pilot study”, Spie, 2000, vol. 3908, pp. 123-130.
Hammer, Daniel X. et al., “Dual OCT/SLO Imager with Three-Dimensional Tracker”, SPIE, 2005, vol. 5688, pp. 33-44.
Hara, Tsutomu, M.D. et al., “Complications associated with endocapsular balloon implantation rabbit eyes”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 1994, vol. 20.
Harding, J. J., “Disulphide Cross-linked Protein of High Molecular Weight in Human Cataractous Lens”, Exp. Eye Res., 1973, vol. 17, pp. 377-383.
Hartwick, Andrew T. E. et al., “Ephitelial activity of hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in cultured bovine lenses recovering from pharmaceutical-induced optical damage”, Molecular Vision, vol. 9, 2003, pp. 594-600.
Heisterkamp, Alexander et al., “Nonlinear effects inside corneal tissue after fs-photodisruption”, SPIE, 2001, vol. 4433, pp. 55-60.
Heisterkamp, Alexander et al., “Pulse energy dependence of subcellular dissection by femtosecond laser pulses”, Optics Express, 2005, vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 3690-3696.
Hemenger, Richard P. et al., “Change With Age of the Refractive Index Gradient of the Human Ocular Lens”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1995. vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 703-707.
Heys, Karl Robert et al., “Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia?”, Molecular Vision, 2004, vol. 10, pp. 956-963.
Ho, A. et al., “Feasibility of simultaneous correction of ametropia by varying gel refractive index with phaco-ersatz”, SPIE, 2001, vol. 4245, pp. 119-128.
Hoffman, Richard S. et al., “Refractive lens exchange as a refractive surgery modality”, Copyright© Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 22-28.
Holzer, Mike P. et al., “Corneal flap complications in refractive surgery—Part 1: Development of an experimental animal model”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, vol. 29, pp. 795-802.
Holzer, Mike P. et al., “Corneal flap complications in refractive surgery—Part 2: Postoperative treatments of diffuse lamellar keratitis in an experimental animal model”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, vol. 29, pp. 803-807.
Horwitz, Joseph, “α-Crystallin can function as a molecular chaperone”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1992, vol. 89, pp. 10449-10453.
Hu, Tian-Sheng et al., “Reversal of Galactose Cataract with Sorbinil in Rats”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1983, vol. 24, pp. 640-644.
Huber, G. et al., “Room-temperature 2-pm HO:YAG and 3-pm ER:YAG Lasers”, Journal de Physique, 3 pgs.
Hunter, David, “First, Gather the Data”, New England Journal of Medicine, 354:4, 2006, pp. 329-331.
Jacques, Paul F. et al., “Long-term vitamin C supplement use and prevalence of early age-related lens opacities”, Am J Clin Nutr,1997, vol. 66, pp. 911-916.
Johannesson, Mattias, “Active Range Imaging 2”, PhD-Thesis: SIMD architectures for Range and Radar Imaging, Linkoping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertations No. 399, 2005 pp. 1-34.
Jones, C.E. et al., “Refractive index distribution and optical properties of the isolated human lens measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)”, Vision Research, 2005, vol. 45, pp. 2352-2366.
Juhasz, T. et al., “Time-resolved Studies of Plama-Mediated Surface Ablation of Soft Biological Tissue with Near-Infrared Picosecond Laser Pulses”, 1997, SPIE, vol. 2975, pp. 271-281.
Juhasz, Tibor, Ph.D. et al., “Dynamics of Shock Waves and Cavitation Bubbles Generated by Picosecond Laser Pulses in Corneal Tissue and Water”, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 1994, vol. 15, pp. 91-98.
Kasthurirangan, Sanjeev, “Amplitude dependent accommodative dynamics in humans”, Vision Research, vol. 43, 2003, pp. 2945-2956.
Kasthurirangan, Sanjeev, “Influence of Amplitude and Starting Point on Accommodative Dynamics in Humans”, IOVS, 2005, vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 3463-3472.
Kaufman, Paul L., M.D., “Accommodation and Presbyopia: Neuromuscular and Biophysical Aspects”, Adler's Physiology of the Eye, pp. 391-411.
Keeney, Arthur H., M.D., “Intralenticular Foreign Bodies”, Arch Ophthal., 1971, vol. 86, pp. 499-501.
Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Accommodation and Presbyopia in the Human Eye—Changes in the Anterior Segment and Crystalline Lens With Focus”, IOVS, vol. 38, No. 3, 1997, pp. 569-578.
Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Scheimpflug and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior segment: a comparative study”, J. Opt. Soc. am. A, vol. 21, No. 3, 2004, pp. 346-354.
Koretz, Jane F. et al., “The Zones of Discontinuity in the Human Lens: Development and Distribution with Age”, Vision Res., 1994, vol. 34, No. 22, pp. 2955-2962.
Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Analysis of Human Crystalline Lens Curvature as a Function of Accommodative State and Age”, Vision Res., 1984, vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 1141-1151.
Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Model of the Accommodative Mechanism in the Human Eye”, Vis. Res., 1982, vol. 22, pp. 917-92.
Koretz, Jane F. et al., “How the Human Eye Focuses”, Scientific American, 1988, pp. 92-99.
Koretz, Jane F. et al., “A Model for Accommodation in the Young Human Eye: The Effects of Lens Elastic Anisotropy on the Mechanism”, Vision Res., 1983, vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 1679-1686.
Koretz, Jane F. et al., “Accommodation and Presbyopia in the Human Eye—Aging of The Anterior Segment”, Vision Res., 1989, vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 1685-169.
König, Karsten et al., “Are Femtosecond Lasers Safe for Ophthalmic Applications?”, Fraunhofer Institute of Biomedical Technologies, pp. 1-16.
König, Karsten et al., “First in vivo animal studies on intraocular nanosurgery and multiphoton tomography with low-energy 80 MHz near infrared femtosecond laser pulses”, SPIE, 2004, vol. 5314, pp. 262-269.
König, Karsten et al., “Cornea surgery with nanojoule femtosecond laser pulses”, SPIE, 2005. vol. 5688, pp. 288-293.
Koopmans, Steven A. et al., “Polymer Refilling of Presbyopic Human Lenses in Vitro Restores the Ability to Undergo Accommodative Changes”, IOVS, 2003, vol. 44, No. 1,pp. 250-257.
Krag, Susanne, “Biomechanical measurements of the lens capsule”, Scandinavian University Theses, 1999.
Krag, Susanne et al., “Mechanical Properties of the Human Posterior Lens Capsule”, IOVS, 2003, vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 691-696.
Krag, Susanne et al., “Biomechanical Characteristics of the Human Anterior Lens Capsule in Relation to Age”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1997, vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 357-362.
Krauss, Joel et al., “Laser Interactions With the Cornea”, Survey of Opthamology A453, vol. 31, No. 1, 1986, pp. 37-53.
Kronemyer, Bob, “Accommodating IOL? Impossible, Recent Study Seems to Say”. Ocular Surgery News, http://www.slackmc.com, Sep. 15, 1996.
Krueger, Ronald R. et al., “Experimental Increase in Accommodative Potential after Neodymium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Photodisruption of Paired Cadaver Lenses”, Ophthalmology, 2001, vol. 108, No. 11, pp. 2122-2129.
Krueger, Ronald R. et al., “First safety study of femtosecond laser photodisruption in animal lenses: Tissue morphology and cataractogenesis”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, vol. 31, pp. 2386-2394.
Krueger, Ronald R., M.D. et al., “Ultrastructure of Picosecond Laser Intrastromal Photodisruption”, Journal of Retractive Surgery, 1996, vol. 12, pp. 607-612.
Krueger, Ronald R., M.D., et al., “Nonmechanical Microkeratomes Using Laser And Water Jet Technology”.
Kurapkiené, S. et al., “The relationship of ultrasonic and mechanical properties of human nuclear cataract. A pilot study”, Ultragarsas, 2005, vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 1392-2114.
Kuizenga, Dirk J., “FM-Laser Operatiob of the Nd:YAG Laser”, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 1970, Bol. 6, No. 11, pp. 673.
Kurtz, Ron et al., “Femtosecond Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery”, SPIE, vol. 3591, 1999, pp. 209-219.
Kurtz, Ron et al., “Ophthalmic Applications of Femtosecond Lasers”, SPIE, vol. 3616, 1999, pp. 51-65.
Kurtz, Ron M. et al., “Optimal Laser Parameters for Intrastromal Corneal Surgery”, SPIE, vol. 3255, 1998, pp. 56-66.
Kurtz, Ron M., MD, et al., “Photodisruption in the Human Cornea as a Function of Laser Pulse Width”, Journal of Refractive Surgery, 1997, vol. 13, pp. 653-658.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “A Quantitative Analysis of Sutural Contributions to Variability in Back Vertex Distance and Transmittance in Rabbit Lenses as a Function of Development, Growth, and Age”, Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 79, No. 3, 2002, pp. 193-204.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Development of lens sutures”, Int. J. Dev. Biol., vol. 48, 2004, pp. 889-902.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Electron Microscope Observations of the Crystalline Lens”, Microscopy Research and Technique, 1996, vol. 33, pp. 441-479.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Fibre cell organization in crystalline lenses”, Experimental Eye Research, vol. 78, 2004, pp. 673-687.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Animal Model Lens Anatomy: Accommodative Range is Related to Fiber Structure and Organization”, Dept. of Ophthalmology and Pathology, 26 pgs.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Suppression of Post-Vitrectomy Lens Changes in the Rabbit by Novel Benzopyranyl Esters and Amides”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 75, 2002, pp. 459-473.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “The Relationship Between Rabbit Lens Optical Quality and Sutural Anatomy after Vitrectomy”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 71, 2000, pp. 267-281.
Kuszak Jer R. et al., “The Structure of the Vertebrate Lens”, Chapter 4, pp. 71-118.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “The Use of An Ex Vivo Mechanical Stretching Apparatus To Examine Fiber Ultrastructure During Accommodation”, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Illinois College of Optometry, 5 pgs.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Biochemistry of The Crystalline Lens; Anatomy of Aged and Senile Cataractous Lenses”, pp. 564-575.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Lens Optical Quality and Lens Sutures”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 32, No. 7, Jun. 1991, pp. 2123-2129.
Kuszak, J. R. et al., “Lens Optical Quality is a Direct Function of Lens Sutural Architecture”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 32, No. 7, Jun. 1991, pp. 2119-2122.
Kuszak, J. et al., “The Surface Morphology of Embryonic and Adult Chick Lens-Fiber Cells”, The American Journal of Anatomy, pp. 395-410.
Kuszak, J. et al., “Gap Junctions of Chick Lens Fiber Cells”, Exp. Eye Res. 27, (1978), pp. 495-498.
Kuwabara, Toichiro, et al., “Electron Microscopic Study of Galactose-Induced Cataract”, Investigative Ophthalmology, vol. 8, No. 2, Apr. 1969, pp. 133-149.
Lerman, Sidney, et al., “A Method for Detecting 8-Methoxypsoralen in the Ocular Lens”, Science, vol. 197, Sep. 23, 1977, pp. 1287-1288.
Lerman, Sidney, et al., “Spectroscopic Evaluation and Classification of the Normal, Aging, and Cataractous Lens”, Opthl. Res., 8: (1976), pp. 335-353.
Lerman, Sidney, et al., “Photosensitization of the lens by 8-meth-oxypsoralen”, Invent. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., vol. 16, No. 11, Nov. 1977, pp. 1066-1068.
Lerman, Sidney, et al., “Psoralen-long-wave Ultraviolet Therapy and Human Cataractogenesis”, Invent. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., 1982, vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 801-804.
Lerman, Sidney, M.D., “Photosensitizing Drugs and Their Possible Role in Enhancing Ocular Toxicity”, Ophthalmology, Mar. 1986, vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 304-318.
L'Esperance, Jr. “Opthalmic Lasers Photocoagulation, Photoradiation and Surgery”, 2nd Edition, copyright 1983, The C.V. Mosby Company, pp. 529-538.
Lim, Seung Jeong, M.D. et al., “Analysis of zonular-free zone and lens size in relation to axial length of eye with age”, J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 24, Mar. 1998, pp. 390-396.
Liu, Xinbing et al., “In vivo plasma-mediated ablation as a function of laser pulsewidth”, SPIE, vol. 2975, 1997, pp. 282-288.
Loerscher, Hanspeter et al., “Noncontact Trephination of the Cornea Using a Pulsed Hydrogen Floride Laser”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 104, pp. 471-475.
Loesel, Frieder H. et al., “Laser-Induced Optical Breakdown on Hard and Soft Tissues and Its Dependence on the Pulse Duration: Experiment and Model”, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 32, No. 10, 1996, pp. 1717-1722.
Lou, Marjorie F., et al., Protein-Thiol Mixed Disulfides in Human Lens, Academic Press Limited, 1992, pp. 889-896.
Lutze, Margaret et al., “Lenses of Diabetic Patients ”Yellow“ at an Accelerated Rate Similar to Older Normals”, Investigative Opholamology & Visual Science, vol. 32, No. 1, Jan. 1991, pp. 194-199.
Maguen, Ezra, et al., “Excimer Laser Ablation of the Human Lens at 308 nm with a Fiber Delivery System”, J. Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 15, Jul. 1989, pp. 409-414.
Manns, Fabrice et al., “Radius of Curvature and Aspericity of the Anterior and Posterior Surface of Human Cadaver Crystalline Lenses”, Science Direct Experimental Eye Research, 78, 2004, pp. 39-51.
Masters, B.R., “Three-dimensional Microscopic Tomographic Imaging of the Cataract in a Human Lens In Vivo”, Optics Express 332, vol. 3, No. 9, 1998, pp. 332-338.
Mathias, R.T. et al., “Physiological Properties of the Normal Lens”, Physiological Review, vol. 77, No. 1, 1997, pp. 21-50.
McDonald, Marguerita B., et al., “Central Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia”, Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 108, Jun. 1990, pp. 799-808.
Michael, Ralph et al., “Refractive Index of Lens Fiber Membranes in Different Parts of the Crystalline Lens”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4611, 2002, pp. 159-164.
Marion, II, John E. et al., “Medical Applications of Ultra-Short Pulse Lasers”, SPIE, vol. 3616, 1999, pp. 42-50.
Moffat, B.A. et al., “Age-Related Changes in Refractive Index Distribution and Power of the Human Lens as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Micro-Imaging in Vitro”, Vision Research, vol. 42, 2002, pp. 1683-1693.
Mutri, Donald O., et al., “A Video Technique for Phakometry of the Human Crystalline Lens”, Investigative Opthalmology, & Visual Science, vol. 33, No. 5, Apr. 1992, pp. 1771-1781.
Myers, Raymond I., “Novel Approaches to Correction of Presbyopia With Laser Modification of the Crystalline Lens”, Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 14, 1998; pp. 136-139.
Myers, O.D., Raymond I. et al., “Feasibility of Using Lasers to Retard Cataract Development in the Ocular Lens by Restoring Lens Movement”; undated, pp. 1-22.
Nanevicz, Tania M., et al., “Excimer Laser Ablation of the Lens”, Arch Opthalmol, vol. 104, Dec. 1986, pp. 1825-1829.
Neev, Joseph, “Ultrashort Pulse Lasers: A New Tool for Biomedical Applications”, SPIE, vol. 3255; pp. 2-7.
Oberheide, Uwe et al., “Therapy Monitoring of Laser Cyclophotocoagulation”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4611, 2002, pp. 48-53.
O'Donnell, Colleen B., et al., “Ablation Smoothness as a Function of Excimer Laser Delivery System”, J. Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 22, Jul./Aug. 1996, pp. 682-685.
O'Donnell, Colleen B., et al., “Surface Roughness in PMMA is Linearly Related to the Amount of Excimer Laser Ablation”, Journal of Refractive Surgery, 1996, vol. 12, pp. 171-174.
Oriowo, Olanrewaju Matthew, “A Study of Ultraviolet Radiation Effects on Procine Crystalline Lens and Development of a New Assay Methodology for UV Cataractogenesis Investigation”, A Thesis Presented to the University of Waterloo, 2000, pp. i-xix and 1-218.
Ostrin, Lisa A. et al., “Effects of Pirenzepine on Pupil Size and Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Oct. 2004, vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 3620-3628.
Ostrin, Lisa A. et al., “The Effects of Phenylephrine on Pupil Diameter and Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys”; Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2004, vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 215-221.
Ostrin, Lisa A, “Comparisons Between Pharmacologically and Edinger-Westphal-Stimulated Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2005, vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 609-617.
Parel, Jean-Marie et al., “Intraocular Implants For The Surgical Correction of Presbyopia”; In Ophthalmic Technologies X, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3908, 2000, pp. 115-122.
Patel, C.K. et al., “The Ageing Lens”, Association of Optometrists, City University, London; undated, www.optometry.co.uk; pp. 27-31.
Pau, Hans et al., “The increasing sclerosis of the human lens with age and its relevance to accommodation and presbyopia”, Graefe's Arch Clin Exp. Ophthalmol (1991) 229, 294-296.
Payne, Peter A. et al., “Ophthalmic Applications of Laser-Generated Ultrasound”; SPIE, vol. 3908, 2000, pp. 13-22.
Peterson, Jennifer A. et al., “Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Cynomolgus Monkeys, Tono-Pen Versus Manometry”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1996, vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 1197-1199.
Puliafito, Carmen A., M.D. et al., “High-Speed Photography of Excimer Laser Ablatio of the Cornea”, Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 105, Sep. 1987, pp. 1255-1259.
Qian, Wen et al., “3 Year Simvastatin Treatment and Lens Nuclear Back Scattering”; J Ophthalmol, vol. 84, 2000, pp. 512-516.
Qian, Wen et al., “Universal Opacity Standard for Scheimpflug Photography”, Ophthalmic Res, 2000, vol. 32, pp. 292-298.
Rafferty, Nancy et al., “Lens Wound Healing and Cataractogenesis in a Pigmented Eye”, Exp. Eye Res. (1984) vol. 38, pp. 267-277.
Riley, Michael V., et al., “The Effects of UV-B Irradiation on the Corneal Endothelium”, Eye Research Institute of Okland Universityl, 1987, pp. 1021-1033.
Ripken, T. et al., “FEM Simulation of the Human Lens Compared to Ex-Vivo Porcine Lens Cutting Pattern: A Possible Treatment of Presbyopia”; 11 pgs.
Ripken, T. et al., “Fs-laser Induced Elasticity Changes to Improve Presbyopic Lens Accommodation”, 10 pgs.
Rockwell, B.A. et al., “Safe Use of Ultrashort Lasers”; SPIE, vol. 3616, 1999, pp. 32-39.
Roesner, C.A.D. et al., “Light-Matter Interactions on the FEMTOSECOND Time Scale”, Department of Physics and Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, pp. 1-27.
Rol, Pascal et al., “An Optomechanical Eye Model for Observation of Lens Photoablation”; SPIE, 1997, vol. 2971, pp. 171-174.
Sacks, Zachary S. et al., “Laser Spot Size as a Function of Tissue Depth and Laser Wavelength in Human Sclera”, SPIE, 1998, vol. 3255, pp. 67-76.
Scammon, Richard J. et al., “Simulations of Shock Waves and Cavitation Bubbles Produced in Water by Picosecond and Nanosecond Laser Pulses”, SPIE, 1998, vol. 3254, pp. 264-275.
Schachar, Ronald A. MD et al., “Mechanism of Human Accommodation as Analyzed by Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis”, Ann Ophthalmol; 2001; vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 103-112.
Schachar, Ronald A., M.D., “Cause and Treatment of Presbyopia With a Method for Increasing the Amplitude of Accommodation”, Annals of Ophthalmol, 1992, vol. 24, pp. 445-452.
Schachar, Ronald A., M.D. et al., “Experimental Support for Schachar's Hypothesis of Accommodation”, Ann Ophthalmol, 1993. vol. 25, pp. 404-409.
Schachar, Ronald A., M.D. et al., “Experimental Destruction of Cataractous Lenses by Laser”, Ophthalmic Surgery, Surgical Forum, pp. 506-509.
Schachar, Ronald A. MD, PhD., et al., “A Revolutionary Variable Focus Lens”, Annals of Ophthalmology, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1996, pp. 11-18.
Schachar, Ronald A., MD, PhD, “Histology of the Ciliary Muscle-Zonular Conections”, Annals of Opthalmology, vol. 28, No. 2, Mar./Apr. 1996, pp. 70-79.
Schachar, Ronald A., MD, PhD, “Pathophysiology of Accommodation and Presbyopia, Understanding the Clinical Implications”, J. Florida M.A., vol. 81, No. 4, Apr. 1994, pp. 268-271.
Schaeffel, Frank, “Kappa and Hirschberg Ratio Measured With an Automated Video Gaze Tracker”, Optometry and Vision Science, 2002, vol. 79, No. 5, pp. 329-334.
Schaffer, Chris B. et al., “Morphology of Femtosecond Laser-Induced Structural Changes in Bulk Transparent Materials”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1441-1443.
Schaffer, Chris B. et al., “Dynamics of Femtosecond Laser-Induced Breakdown in Water From Femtoseconds to Microseconds”, Optics Express, 2002, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 196-203.
Shen, Nan; “Photodisruption in Biological Tissues Using Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, A Thesis Presented to the Department of Physics, Harvard University, 2003, pp. 1-125.
Shen, Nan, et al., “Ablation Of Cytoskeletal Filaments And Mitochondria In Live Cells Using A Femtosecond Laser Nanoscissor”, MCB, 2005, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 17-25.
Shen, Nan, et al., “Photodisruption in Biological Tissues And Single Cells Using Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, 2 pgs.
Shen, Nan, et al., “Surface And Bulk Photodisruption In Turbid Tissue Using Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, Department of Physics and Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, pp. 1-24.
Sher, Neal A., MD, “Hyperopic Refractive Surgery”, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2001, vol. 12, pp. 304-308.
Sivak, Jacob G., “Through The Lens Clearly: Phylogeny and Development, The Proctor Lecture”, Opthalmology & Visual Science, 2004, vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 740-747.
Slingsby, Christine, “Lens Crystallin Crystal Structures”, 3 pgs.
Söderberg, Per G., et al., “Angular Dependence Of The Intensity Of Back Scattered Light From Human Lenses With Nuclear Cataract, Implications for Measurement”, SPIE, 2000, vol. 3908, pp. 34-37.
Söderberg, Per G., et al., “External Standard for Measurements with The Scheimpflug Slitlamp Microscope”, SPIE, 1997, vol. 2971, pp. 8-13.
Solomon, Ira Seth, M.D., “Aqueous Humor Dynamics”, 17 pgs.
Spector, Abraham, “Aging of the Lens and Cataract Formation”, Aging and Human Visual Function, pp. 27-43.
Srinivasan R. et al., “Excimer Laser Surgery of the Cornea”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, 1993, pp. 710-715.
Srinivasan, R., “Ablation of Polymers and Biological Tissue by Ultraviolet Oct.”, 1986, 1 pg.
Stitzel, Joel D., et al., “A Nonlinear Finite Element Model of the Eye With Experimental Validation for the Prediction of Globe Rupture”, Stapp Car Crash Journal, 2002, vol. 45, 24 pgs.
Stitzel, Joel D., et al., “Blunt Trauma of the Aging Eye”, Arch Ophthalmol, 2005, vol. 123, pp. 789-794.
Strauss, Moshe, et al., “Two-Dimensional Rayleigh Model of Vapor Bubble Evolution”, SPIE, 1999, vol. 3601, pp. 212-224.
Strenk, Susan A., et al, “Age-Related Changes in Human Ciliary Muscle and Lens: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 1999, vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 1162-1169.
Strenk, Susan A., et al, “The Mechanism of Presbyopia”, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 2004 vol. 11, pp. 1-15.
Strenk, Susan A. et al., “Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Effects of Age and Accommodation on the Human Lens Cross-Sectional Area”, IOVS, 2004, Vo. 45, No. 2, pp. 539-545.
Sweeney, Matthew H.J., et al., “Movement of Cysteine In Intact Monkey Lenses: The Major Site of Entry is the Germinative Region”, Experimental Eye Research, 2003, vol. 77. pp. 245-251.
Swegmark, Gunnar, “Studies With Impedance Cyclography on Human Ocular Accommodation At Different Ages”, ACTA Opthalmologica, vol. 47, 1969, 1186-1206.
Taboada, J. et al., “Response of the Corneal Epithelium to KrF Excimer Laser Pulses”, Health Physics, vol. 30, 1981, pp. 677-683.
Taboada, J., et al., “Optically Coupled Technique for Photorefractive Surgery of the Cornea”, Optics Letters, vol. 15, No. 9, May 1, 1990, pp. 458-460.
Tahi, Hassan, et al., “Restoring Accommodation: Surgical Technique and Preliminary Evaluation in Rabbits”, SPIE, 1999, vol. 3591, pp. 267-269.
Tamm, Svenja, et al., “Age-Related Changes of the Human Ciliary Muscle. A Quantitative Morphometric Study”, Mechanisms of Aging and Development, vol. 62, 1992, pp. 209-221.
Tang, Daxin; “Influence of Age, Diabetes, and Cataract on Calcium, Lipid-Calcium, and Protein-Calcium Relationships in Human Lenses”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2003, vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 2059-2066.
Taylor, Virginia L. et al., “Morphology of the Normal Human Lens”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jun. 1996, vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 1396-1410.
Topilow, Harvey W., M.D., “Vitreous Changes in Retinal Branch Vein Occlusion”, Arch Ophthalmol, 1987, vol. 105, pp. 1165-165.
Trokel, Stephen L., M.D., et al., “Eximer Laser Surgery of the Cornea”, American Journal of Opthalmology, vol. 96, No. 6, Dec. 1983, pp. 710-715.
Tsai, Philbert S., “All-Optical, In-Situ Histology of Neuronal Tissue with Femtosecond Laser Pulses”, Imaging In Neuroscience and Development, CSHL Press, 12 pgs.
Tsubota, Kazuo, “Application of Erbium: YAG Laser in Ocular Ablation”, Ophthalmologica, 1990, 200:pp. 117-122.
Van Alphen, G.W.H.M., et al., “Elasticity of Tissues Involved in Accommodation”, Vision Res., vol. 31, No. 7/8, 1991, pp. 1417-1438.
Venugopalan, V., et al., “The Thermodynamic Response of Soft Biological Tissues to Ultraviolet Laser Irradiation”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 60, Oct. 1995, pp. 1258-1271.
Vilupuru, Abhiram S., “Spatially Variant Changes In Lens Power During Ocular Accommodation In A Rhesus Monkey Eye”, Journal of Vision, 2004, vol. 4, pp. 299-309.
Vilupuru, Abhiram S., “Optical and Biometric Relationships of the Isolated Pig Crystalline Lens”, Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., 2001, vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 296-311.
Vogel, Alfred, et al., “Interaction of Laser-Produced Cavitation Bubbles With An Elastic Tissue Model”, SPIE, 2001, vol. 4257, pp. 167-177.
Vogel, Alfred, et al., “Numerical Simulation Of Optical Breakdown For Cellular Surgery At Nanosecond to Femtosecond Time Scales”, SPIE, 2001, vol. 4433, pp. 70-80.
Vogel, Alfred, et al., “Laser-Induced Breakdown In The Eye At Pulse Durations From 80 ns to 100 fs”, SPIE, 1998, vol. 3255, pp. 34-49.
Vogel, Alfred, et al; “Kinetics Of Phase Transitions In Pulsed IR Laser Ablation of Biological Tissues”, SPIE, 2003, vol. 4961, pp. 66-74.
Vogel, Alfred, PhD., et al., “Factors Determining the Refractive Effects of Intrastromal Photorefractive Keratectomy with the Picosecond Laser”, J. Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 23, Nov. 1997, pp. 1301-1310.
Vrensen, G. F. J. M., “Aging of the human eye lens—A morphological point of view”, Comp. Biochem. Physiol., vol. 111A, 519-532, 1995.
Waring III, George O., M.D., “Presbyopia and Accommodative Intraocular Lenses—the Next Frontier in Refractive Surgery?”, Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 8, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 421-423.
Weale, Robert D., SC., “Presbyopia Toward the End of the 20th Century”, Survey of Opthalmology, vol. 34, No. 1, Jul.-Aug. 1989, pp. 15-29.
Werblin, Theodore P., M.D., “Should We Consider Clear Lens Extraction for Routine Refractive Surgery?”, Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 8, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 480-481.
Werner, Liliana, MD, et al., “Capsular Bag Opacification After Experimental Implantation Of A New Accommodating Intraocular Lens in Rabbit Eyes”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, vol. 30, pp. 1114-1123.
Werner, Liliana, MD. et al., “Posterior Capsule Opacification in Rabbit Eyes Implanted With 1-Piece and 3-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses”, J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, vol. 31, pp. 805-811.
Wyatt, Harry J., “Application of a Simple Mechanical Model of Accommodation to the Aging Eye”, Eye Res., 1993, vol. 33, No. 5/6, pp. 731-738.
Ziebarth, Nöel, et al; “Non-contact Optical Measurement Of Lens Capsule Thickness During Simulated Accommodation”, SPIE, 2005, vol. 5688. pp. 19-25.
Zuclich, Joseph A. et al., “In Situ Measurements of Lens Fluorescence and its Interference With Visual Function”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 33, No. 2, 1993, pp. 410-415.
Zuclich, Joseph A. et al., “A comparison of laser-induced retinal damage from infrared wavelengths to that from visible wavelengths”, Lasers and Light, 1997, vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 15-29.
Zuclich, Joseph, “In Vivo Measurements of Optical Properties of the Ocular Lens”, Reprinted from Proceedings of Ultraviolet Radiation Hazards, Jan. 26-27, 1994, SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2134B Ultraviolet Radiation Hazards, 1994, pp. 99-112.
Zuclich, J.A., et al., “Ocular Effects of Penetrating IR Laser Wavelengths”, Reprinted from Proceedings of Laser-Tissue Interaction VI, Feb. 6-9, 1995, SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2391, 1995, pp. 111-125.
Zuclich, Joseph A., et al., “Rapid Noninvasive Optical Characterization of the Human Lens”, Lasers in the Life Sciences, 6(1), 1994, pp. 39-53.
Zuclich, Joseph A., “Workshop on Long-Term Visual Health Risks of Optical Radiation—Thermal Cataracts Induced by UV Laser Radiation”, Workshop Report, Cataract Working Group.
Zuclich, Joseph A., “Ultraviolet-Induced Photochemical Damage in Ocular Tissues”, Health Physics, vol. 56, No. 5, May 1989, pp. 671-681.
Zuclich, Joseph A., “Research on the Ocular Effects of Laser Radiation”, Technology Incorporated: Life Sciences Division.
Faraggi, E. et al., “Stress confinement, shock wave formation and laser induced damage”, Conference 5695: Optical Interactions with Tissue and Cells XVI, Photonics West, undated, 1 pg.
Fisher, R F, “The ciliary body in accommodation”, Trans Ophthalmol Soc. UK, 1989, vol. 105, 1 pg.
Fisher, RF. “The mechanics of accommodation in relation to presbyopia”, Eye, 1988, vol. 2. 1 pg.
Garner, LF et al., “Changes in equivalent and gradient refractive index of the crystalline lens with accommodation”, Optom Vis. Sci., 1997, vol. 74,1 pg.
Garner LF et al., “Changes in ocular dimensions and refraction with accommodation”, Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 1997, vol. 17, 1 pg.
Helsterkamp, A. et al., “Nanosurgery in live cells using ultrashort laser pulses”, Conference 5695: Optical Interactions with Tissue and Cells XVI, Photonics West, undated, 1 pg.
Kuszak, J.R., “Progressively More Complex Star Sutures Formed oin Primate Lenses During Periods of Development, Growth and Aging Are Related to Accommodation”, Abstracts Online, obtained from the Internet on Apr. 19, 2006 at: http://www.abstractsonline.com/viewer/viewAbstractPrintFriendly.asp?CKey={C8FDF5D . . . Apr. 19, 2006, I page.
McBrien NA et al., “Experimental myopia in a diurnal mammal (Sciurus carolinensis) with no accommodative ability”, J Physiol., 1993, vol. 469, 1 pg.
McCourt ME et al., “Refractive state, depth of focus and accommodation of the eye of the California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi)”, Vision Res., 1984, vol. 24, 1 pg.
Prokofeva GL et al., Effects of low-intensity infrared laser irradiation on the eye An experimental study, Vestn Oftalmol., 1996, vol. 112, 1 pg.
Rafferty, NS et al., “Comparative study of actin filament patterns in lens epithelial cells, Are these determined by the mechanisms of lens accommodation?”, Curr Eye Res., 1989, vol. 8, 1 pg.
Rao, Ch. Mohan et al., “Level of Reduced Nucleotides and Lens Photodamage”, National Eye Institute, undated, 1 pg.
Van Alphen GW et al., “Elasticity of tissues involved in accommodation”, Vision Res., 1991, vol. 31, 1 pg.
Wang, B. et al., “In-vivo animal studies on intraocular nanosurgery with low-energy 80 MHZ near infrared femtosecond laser pulses”, Conference 5695: Optical Interactions with Tissue and Cells XVI, Photonics West, undated, 1 pg.
Kuszak et al., “Light, scanning and electron micrographs have lead to the following interpretations of secondary fiber formation”, 2004, 16 pgs.
Lubatschowski, H. et al., “Treatment of Presbyopia by Cutting the Cystaline Lens: A Comparison of FEM Simulation and Ex vivo Studies”, Lazer Zentrum Hannover e. V.
“Principles of Ultrafast Laser Surgery Femtosecond Laser-Tissue Interaction”, copyright © Center for Ultrafast Optical Sciences, Un of Michigan, 3 pgs.
“Presbyopia—preconditions”, Laser Zentrum Hannover e.., 11 pgs.
Interalase brochure: The Essential Component of Better Vision.
Gattass, Rafael et al., “Femtosecond laser micromaching Applications in Technology and Biology”, Photonics West conference Jan. 2005, 78 pgs.
Mazur, Eric, “An Introduction to Femtosecond Laser Science”, Photonics West conference Jan. 2005, 291 pgs.
Nebel, Achim et al., “Fast Micromachining using Picosecond Lasers”, Photonics West conference Jan. 2005, 37 pgs.
Hermans E. et al., “Estimating the External Force Acting on the Human Eye Lens During Accommodation Using Finite Elements Modeling”, presentation on Accommodation & Presbyopia, May 2005, 1 pg.
Shen, J. et al. “Measurement of the Lens Capsule Contraction Force in the Radial Direction”, presentation on Accommodation & Presbyopia, May 2005, 1 pg.
Avro, “Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Visual Research”, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, copyright © 2002, obtained from the Internet on Jan. 15, 2005 at: http://www.avro.org/AboutAvro/animalst.asp, 3 pgs.
OSN SuperSite, “Increase in leans stiffness with age may cause presbyopia, study suggests”, 2005, 1 pg.
Figure 4.2—Optical constants for a “standard eye”, undated, 1 pg.
Picture of an eye obtained from the Internet on Mar. 28, 2005 at: http://www.opt.uh.edu/research/aglasser/aao/gonioani.gif, 1 pg.
Pictures of eyes, 5 pgs.
Loesel paper graphs, 2 pgs.
CD-ROM containing copies of seven videos relating to eyes: AG.MOV, Glasser.WMV, Kuszak & Zoltoski movie1.mov, Kuszak & Zoltoski movie2.mov, Kuszak & Zoltoski movie3.mov, VidepClip1.mov, VideoClip2.mov.
Optical Radiation and Visual Health, pp. 28-33.
Breitenfeld, P., et al., Finite Element Method-Simulation of the Human Lens during Accomodation, Proc. SPIE Therapuetic Laser Applications and Laser-Tissue Interactions II, vol. 5863, (2005) 9 pgs.
Ripken, T., et al., First in-vivo studies of presbyopia treatment with ultrashort laser pulses, Proc. SPIE 5142, 137, (2003) 9 pgs.
Ripken, T., et al., Investigations for the correction of presbyopia by fs-laser induced cuts, Proc. SPIE 5314, 27, (2004) 9 pgs.
Gills, James P., “Treating astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery”, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2002, vol. 13, p. 2-6.
Nichamin, Louis D., “Treating astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery”, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2003, vol. 14, p. 35-38.
Chinese Office Action for related application No. CN 200780009762.6, dated Mar. 2, 2011, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2011/023159, dated Mar. 16, 2011, 6 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2011/023117, dated Mar. 25, 2011, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2011/22859, dated Apr. 4, 2011, 7 pgs.
Vogel, Alfred et al., “Intraocular Photodisruption With Picosecond and Nanosecond laser Pulses: Tissue Effects in Cornea, Lens and Retina”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jun. 1994, No. 7, vol. 35, pp. 3032-3044.
Krueger et al., “Experimental Increase In Accommadative Potential After Neodymium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Photodisruption of Paired Cadaver Lenses”, Ophthalmology, vol. 108, No. 11, Nov. 2001, pp. 2122-2129.
Vogel, Alfred et al., “Intraocular Photodisruption With Picosecond and Nanosecond Laser Pulses: Tissue Effects in Cornea, Lens and Retina”, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jun. 1994, vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 3032-3044.
Hammer, Daniel et al., “Shielding Properties of Laser-Induced Breakdown In Water For Pulse Durations From 5 ns to 125 fs”, Applied Optics, 1997, vol. 36, No. 22, pp. 5630-5640.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2012/030247,dated Jul. 9, 2012, 6 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2012/030059,dated Jul. 13, 2012, 12 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2012/030259,dated Jul. 13, 2012, 11 pgs.
Chinese Office Action for related application No. CN 200780009762.6, dated Sep. 9, 2010, 9 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2010/041324, dated Sep. 23, 2010, 11 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2010/041286, dated Sep. 14, 2010, 8 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2010/042582, dated Sep. 20, 2010, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2010/043255, dated Sep. 16, 2010, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for related application No. PCT/US2010/043117, dated Sep. 10, 2010, 14 pgs.
Author unknown, “Statement of the Use of Animals in Opthalmic and Visual Research”, the Association for Research in Vision and Opthalmology“, Obtained from the Internet at: http”//www.avro.org/aboutavro as of Nov. 18, 2010, 3 pgs.
Brian, G. et ail., “Cataract Blindness—Challenges For The 21st Century”, Bulletin of the World Health Origination, vol. 79, No. 3, 2001, pp. 249-256.
Eisner, Georg, “Eye Surgery—An Introduction to operative technique”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980, pp. 14-19.
Garner, LF et al., “Changes in Equivalent and Gradient Refractive Index of the Crystalline Lens with Accommodation”, Optom, Vis. Sci., vol. 72, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. 114-119.
Garner, LF et al., “Changes in Ocular Dimensions and Refraction with Accommodation”, Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 17, No. 1, 1997, pp. 12-17.
Glasser, A. and Campbell, MCW, “Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline end with age in relation to presbyopia”, Vision Research, vol. 39, 1999, pp. 1991-2015.
Glasser, A. and Campbell, MCW, “On the potential causes of presbyopia”, Vision Research, vol. 39, 1999, pp. 1267-1272.
Hanson SSRA, Hasan A, Smith DL, Smith. JB, “The major in vivo modifications of the human water insoluble lens crystalline are disulfide bonds, desmidation, methoinine oxidation and backbone cleavage”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 71, 2000, pp. 195-207.
Juhasz, T. et al. “Time resolved observations of shock waves and cavitatin bubbles generated by femtosecond laser pulses in corneal tissue and water”, Lasers in Surgery and Med, vol. 19, 1996, pp. 23-31.
Krueger, R.R., “Surf's Up—Catch a wave with a waterjet”, Jrn. Ref. Surg., vol. 14, No. 6, May/Jun. 1998, pp. 280-281.
Kuszak, JR et al., “The interrelationship of lens anatomy and optical quality II Primate Lenses”, Exp. Eye Res., vol. 59, 1994, pp. 521-535.
Lubatschowski, Holger, “Surgical Laser System for the Treatment of Presbyopia”, 7th Biotech in Europe Investor Forum, Switzerland, Oct. 2-3, 2007, 9 pgs.
McBrien, N. A et al., “Experimental Myopia in a Diurnal Mammal (Sciurus carolinesis) with No Accommodative Ability”, J. Physiol., vol. 469, 1993, pp. 427-441.
McCourt, M. E et al., Refractive State, Depth of Focus, and Accommodation of the Eye of the California ground squirrel (Spermophiliu beecheyi), Vision Res, vol. 24, No. 10, 1984, pp. 1261-1266.
Prokofeva, G. I et al., “Effects of Low-Intensity Infrared Laser Irradiation on the Eye, (An Experimental Study)”, Vestn. Oftalmol., vol. 112, No. 1, 1996, pp. 31-32, with English Abstract, 5 pgs.
Sliney, D. H et al., “Medical Lasers and Their Safe Use”, Springer Verlag, New York, 1993, pp. 42-50.
International Search Report for related application No. PCT/US2011/56279,dated Feb. 1, 2012, 9 pgs.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 13/273,653, filed Oct. 14, 2011 (31 pgs).
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,130, filed Mar. 22, 2012 (34 pgs).
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,149, filed Mar. 22, 2012 (29 pgs).
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 13/427,319, filed Mar. 22, 2012 (32 pgs).
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 13/435,103, filed Mar. 30, 2012 (72 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 14/444,311, filed Jul. 28, 2014, Teuma et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/444,339, filed Jul. 28, 2014, McWhirter et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/444,366, filed Jul. 28, 2014, Morely.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/444,311, filed Jul. 28, 2014, 22 pgs.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/444,339, filed Jul. 28, 2014, 20 pgs.
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 14/444,366, filed Jul. 28, 2014, 29 pgs.
FDA PMA P030002 titled “crystalens™ Model AT-45 Accomodating Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens (OIO)”, dated Nov. 14, 2003, 16 pgs.
FDA PMA P040020 titled “AcrySof® ResSTOR® Apodized Diffractive Optic Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses, Models MA60d3 and SA60D3”, dated Mar. 21, 2005, 29 pgs.
Bliss, E. S., “Pulse Duration Dependence of laser Damage Mechamisms”, Opto-Electronics, vol. 3, 1971, pp. 99-108.
Chaker, M. et al., “Interaction of a 1 psec laser pulse with solid matter”, Phys. Fluids B 3, vol. 1, Jan. 1991, pp. 167-175, plus cover page.
Chien, C. Y. et al., “Production of a high-density and high-temperature plasma with an intense high-contrast subpicosecond laser”, Optics Letters, vol. 18, No. 18, Sep. 15, 1993, pp. 1535-1537.
Corkum, P. B. et al., “Thermal Response of Metals to Ultrashort-Pulse Laser Excitation”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, No. 25, Dec. 19, 1988, pp. 2886-2889.
Du, D. et al., “Laser-induced breakdown by impact ionization in SiO2 with pulse widths from 7 ns to 150 fs”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 64, No. 23, Jun. 6, 1994, pp. 3071-3073.
Klem, D. E. et al., “The Interaction of Intense Femtosecond Laser Pulses with Solid Targets”, paper prepared under the auspices of the U.S. Dept. of Energy for the Short Wavelength V: Physics with Intense Laser Pulses Second Topical Meeting on Mar. 29-31, published Dec. 30, 1992, 1993, 6 pgs.
Liu, X. et al., “Competition between Ponderomotive abd Thermal Forces in Short-Scale-Length Laser Plasmas”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 69, No. 13, Sep. 28, 1992, pp. 1935-1938.
Müller, F. et al., “A Comparative Study of Deposition of Thin Films by Laser Induced PVD with Femtosecond and Nanosecond Laser Pulses”, SPIE, vol. 1858, 1993, pp. 464-474.
Naranjo-Tackman, Ramon et al., “Subepithelial arquate (sic) incisions, using the femtosecond surgical laser, in post-phaco astigmatism: Preliminary visual and refractive results”, a powerpoint presentation shown at ESCRS meeting held in London England in Sep. 2006, 8 pgs.
Sauteret, C. et al., “Laser designers eye petawatt power”, Laser Focus World, Oct. 1990, pp. 85-92 with cover page.
Soileau, M. J. et al., “Temporal Dependence of laser-Induced Breakdown in NaCl and Si02”, prepared for Dept. of Physics, North Texas State University, ????publication date unknown, 19 pgs.
Stuart, B. C. et al., “Laser-Induced Damage in Dielectrics with Nanosecond to Subpicosecond Pulses”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 74, No. 12, Mar. 20, 1995, pp. 2248-2251.
Wilks, S. C. et al., “Absorption of ultra-Intense Laser Pulses”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 69, No. 9, Aug. 31, 1992, pp. 1383-1386.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070173795 A1 Jul 2007 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11337127 Jan 2006 US
Child 11414819 US