The present disclosure pertains to management of devices and particularly to versioning the devices. More particularly, the disclosure pertains to management and versioning the devices in a multi-site environment.
The disclosure reveals an energy management and control system that may manage versioning firmware for devices. The system may be structured in a hierarchy of enterprise, site and field levels, with one or more computing platforms at the various levels. An enterprise supervisor may detect and obtain new version firmware for the devices at the field level. The new version firmware may be transferred from the supervisor to one or more site controllers. The one or more site controllers may transfer the new version firmware to eligible field devices. The devices may report to their respective site controllers a status of a transfer of the new version firmware. The site controllers may report to the supervisor the status of the transfer. Detection of new version firmware may be automatic. Transfer of the new version firmware to virtually all of the eligible devices may be automatic.
The present system and approach, as described herein and/or shown in the Figures, may incorporate one or more processors, computers, controllers, user interfaces, wireless and/or wire connections, and/or the like, wherever desired.
An energy management and control system (EMCS) may be a three-tier hierarchy with enterprise, site and field levels. Computing platforms (computers/controllers) at each level may execute applications specific to the functionality required at that level.
At the field level, the EMCS may consist of numerous devices, each of which performs a specific function. These devices might be, for example, simple input/output modules (IOMs), electronic thermostats (ETMs) that control rooftop heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units, lighting control units (LCUs) that manage a building's interior and exterior lights, and/or other kinds of devices. Additionally, each controller type may be comprised of various models; ETM-1, ETM-2 and ETM-3 might be models of ETMs that are differentiated by unique features and/or functions.
Each field device in an EMCS may contain a program (or firmware) which controls that device's functionality. Virtually all controllers of a particular model, ETM-1s for example, may execute the same version of firmware. As new features and functions are developed, or as bugs are fixed, new firmware versions may be transferred to each controller. Placing another version of firmware in place of firmware in a controller or that of a field device may be regarded as “versioning”.
In the related art, field device versioning may be a manual process. One may manually connect to each site and initiate a firmware update for each field device needing a new version. When a particular model of controller needs to have its firmware updated, the effort of versioning may be complex, costly and time-consuming.
Depending on a building's size, an EMCS might consist of a few or several dozen controllers. While a small footprint building may have only ten ETMs, and a few IOMs and LCUs, a larger building may have thirty ETMs, and a dozen IOMs and LCUs.
As the scale of a multi-site enterprise increases, the number of controllers that should be managed may greatly increase. A single site may have only ten to thirty ETM-1 controllers; however, an enterprise with hundreds of sites may need to manage thousands of ETM-1s. If the enterprise has over a thousand sites, the controller count may be in the tens of thousands.
The present system and approach may manage the task of deploying firmware versions to controllers in a multi-site enterprise. The issues of time, cost and complexity may be addressed by distributing and automating the tasks associated with version management across the enterprise hierarchy.
The tasks, or responsibilities, at the various levels of the hierarchy may be noted in the following. The enterprise supervisor, controller or computer (enterprise) may provide a versioning service which manages the field device versioning process. It may provide a user interface for the versioning service which allows a user to configure, manage and monitor the versioning process. It may provide a query mechanism to determine the field device inventory of each site. The enterprise may have a capability to automatically detect when a firmware file containing a new version of the program for a particular model of field device is placed on the enterprise and may initiate the file transfer process. The enterprise may transfer a firmware file to each site at which at least one compatible device model is installed. The enterprise may receive updates from each site about the progress/status of the transfer process.
The site controller may respond to an enterprise query for the site controller's field device inventory. The site controller may receive a firmware file from the enterprise. The site controller may automatically initiate and manage the process of transferring a firmware file to each compatible field device. The site controller may report the progress/status of the transfer process to the enterprise.
The field device may receive a firmware file from the site controller. The field device may report the progress/status of the transfer process to the site controller.
The enterprise level may be a centralized application which manages and monitors the control system at multiple, remote sites. A site may have one or more site controllers which manage, control, and monitor one or more networks of field devices. The field device may typically be designed to control a piece of EMCS equipment. Other uses may include control of indoor and outdoor lights, control of signage, and more.
The present system and approach may have enhanced functionality at each level of the EMCS. The enterprise may have a versioning service added to an enterprise application. This service may coordinate virtually all activities related to versioning of field devices. The service may provide a user interface which allows the user to configure the service's behavior and monitor versioning activities. A query mechanism may interrogate each site in the enterprise to obtain a field device inventory from each site controller. This inventory may then be available to the user interface allowing the user to view and manage the installed base of field devices. The user may modify versioning behavior at the enterprise, site, site controller, or field device level; for instance, enabling the services ability to automatically detect the presence of a new firmware file and initiate the file transfer process, enabling or disabling the automatic firmware upgrade functionality of one or more specific sites, site controllers, and/or field device types.
A firmware file (firmware) may be saved to a specific subdirectory on the computer's file system. Based on the configuration of the versioning service, the enterprise application may monitor that subdirectory for the presence of a new file. When a new file is detected, the enterprise application may initiate the file transfer process. Alternately, the file transfer process may be initiated manually through the application's user interface.
The firmware file may be parsed to determine the target field device model. Each site in the enterprise may then be scanned, depending on the site-specific configuration, to locate sites at which the particular field device is installed. When a qualifying site is found, the firmware file may be transferred to the appropriate site controller. This transfer process may begin with the enterprise application notifying the site controller with a “start of file transfer” message. Once the site controller acknowledges the message, the enterprise application may transfer the file according to the enterprise-to-site communications protocol.
The enterprise application may execute a monitoring process which receives progress/status updates from the site controllers as the firmware file is being received and the field devices are being updated. The monitoring process may maintain a user interface which displays the current progress and/or status of the firmware upgrade activities.
In conjunction with the field device inventory, the versioning service may maintain a history of upgrade activity for each field device. When the site controller receives a “start of file transfer” message from the enterprise application, the site controller may prepare a location on its local file store (or comparable storage medium) to save the incoming file. The site controller may receive the file according to an enterprise-to-site communications protocol and save the file. As the file is received, the site controller may update the enterprise application with progress and/or status information.
At the end of the file transfer, the site controller may parse the firmware file to determine the target field device model. The site controller may then scan its device network or networks to locate compatible field devices. When a qualifying field device is found, the site controller may flag that device as needing a firmware upgrade.
The site controller may use a polling mechanism to schedule communications with its one or more networks of field devices. As each device gets a turn, the polling task may check if the device has been flagged for a firmware upgrade. Following the site controller-to-field device communications protocol, the firmware file may be transmitted to the field device. During the upgrade process, the site controller may receive progress and/or status updates from the field device and communicate those updates to the enterprise application.
When a field device receives a “start of firmware upgrade” message from the site controller, the device may prepare, according to its device specification, for a firmware upgrade. The device may receive and process the new program according to its device specification; these details may incorporate where and/or how the new version is saved during the upgrade and the mechanism for replacing the current application with the new version. As the firmware upgrade process occurs, the device may update the site controller with progress/status information.
A block representing each site level controller 16 may contain blocks indicating a versioning service 50, site data model, a web server, alarm management, history management, and device control and demand response strategies. There may be additional blocks indicating other items relative to site level controller 16.
Components of versioning service 50 of site controller 16 may incorporate a query engine 32, a versioning job processor 33, a file transfer engine 34 and a file transfer manager 35. Site controller 16 may also incorporate a communication engine 36.
An enterprise manager 41 may provide direction and information to user interface 21. For instance, manager 41 may load a new version firmware file via a user interface. The firmware is an example file. Another file or information may be loaded. Manager 41 may configure and initiate a version deployment job. Supervisor 12 may query a site 13, 14 or 15 for a device 17 inventory. For illustrative purposes, site 13 may be considered as an example. The query may be via a connection 38 between query engines 22 and 32. Versioning job processor 23 of supervisor 12 may initiate a firmware file transfer from supervisor 12 to site 13 via a connection 39 between job processor 23 and file transfer engine 24. Versioning service 40 of supervisor 12 may update the versioning service 50 of site 13 with versioning job details along a connection 42 between versioning job processor 23 of supervisor 12 and versioning job processor 33 of site controller 16. The firmware file may be transferred from supervisor 12 to site 13 via a connection 43 between file transfer engine 24 and file transfer engine 34. Site 13 may receive the firmware file at file transfer engine 34 and save the firmware file to a local file store. Site 13 may update supervisor 12 with firmware file transfer status via connection 43.
Versioning job processor 33 at site 13 may update file transfer manager 35 with needed transfer tasks via a connection 44 between versioning job processor 33 and file transfer manager 35. File transfer manager 35 may interact with file transfer engine 34 via a connection 45 to download the firmware file to the appropriate devices 17 via a connection 47 from a communication engine 36. Communication engine 36 may incorporate protocol stacks, encode/decode logic, and so forth. The one or more field devices 17 may receive the firmware file and report a status to site controller 16 via connection 47 between communication engine 36 and the one or more field devices 17.
File transfer manager 35 may update versioning job processor 33 of site 13 via connection 44 with a current status of the firmware file transfer operations. Versioning service 50 of site 13 may update versioning service 40 of supervisor 12 with a versioning job status via connection 42 between versioning job processor 33 and versioning job processor 23. Job processor 23 of supervisor 12 may update a versioning history log with the versioning job status. Enterprise manager 41 may monitor progress and status of the deployment job of the firmware file via the versioning service user interface 21 of supervisor 12.
To recap, an energy management and control system may incorporate a supervisor controller having a first versioning service component, one or more site controllers, having a second versioning service component, connected to the supervisor controller, and one or more field devices, having firmware, connected to the one or more site controllers. The first versioning service component may have a configuration that enables automatic detection by the supervisor controller of new version firmware. A query may be made by the first versioning service component to the second versioning service component for an inventory of the one or more field devices to determine which field devices, if any, are appropriate for receipt of the new version firmware. The first versioning service component may launch a versioning job process and transfer the new version firmware to the second versioning service component to continue the versioning job process. The versioning job process may incorporate installing the new version firmware in the one or more field devices determined as appropriate for receipt of the new version firmware.
The first versioning component may incorporate a user interface. A user may provide, via the user interface, the configuration to the first versioning service component that enables automatic detection by the supervisor controller of the new version firmware.
A field device appropriate for receipt of the new version firmware may have a present version firmware which is upgradeable or replaceable with the new version firmware. The field device, appropriate for receipt of the new version firmware, may report to a site controller a status of a transfer of the new version firmware.
A site controller may report a status of transfer operations of the new version firmware to the first versioning service component so that a user can monitor the status and progress of the transfer operations via the user interface.
When the first versioning service component launches the versioning job process and transfers the new version firmware to the second versioning service component to continue the versioning job process, the job process may automatically continue until virtually all of the one or more field devices determined as appropriate for receipt of the new version firmware, have been installed with the new version firmware unless interrupted by a user via a user interface to the system.
An energy management and control system having a mechanism for versioning firmware of field devices, may incorporate an enterprise supervisor, one or more site controllers connected to the enterprise supervisor, and one or more field devices connected to the one or more site controllers. The one or more field devices may incorporate firmware that controls an operation of the one or more field devices, respectively.
The enterprise supervisor may detect new version firmware for one or more field devices. The enterprise supervisor may query the one or more site controllers for an inventory of appropriate field devices qualified to receive the new version firmware. Upon a launch initiated by a user, the enterprise supervisor may transfer the new version firmware to the one or more site controllers. The new version firmware may be transferred by the one or more site controllers to virtually all of the appropriate field devices. A transfer of the new version firmware may replace or upgrade the firmware in the appropriate field devices.
The enterprise supervisor may incorporate a versioning service that detects the new version firmware. The versioning service may provide information about receipt and transfer of new version software to a versioning history log.
The one or more site controllers may update the enterprise supervisor with a status of a transfer of the new version firmware.
Upon transfer the new version firmware to the one or more site controllers, the new version firmware may then be automatically transferred to the appropriate field devices.
An energy management and control system may incorporate a supervisor having a first versioning service component, at least one site controller, connected to the supervisor, having a second versioning service component, and one or more field devices connected to the at least one site controller.
The first versioning service component may be loaded with new version firmware. The new version firmware may be transferred by the first versioning service component to the second versioning service component. The second versioning service component may transfer the new version firmware to replace or upgrade firmware in the one or more field devices.
The first versioning service component may incorporate a user interface, a first query engine, a first file transfer engine, and a first versioning job processor connected to the first file transfer engine.
The second versioning service component may incorporate a second query engine connected to the first query engine, a second file transfer engine connected to the first file transfer engine, a second versioning job processor connected to the first versioning job processor, and a file transfer manager connected to the second versioning job processor and the second file transfer engine.
The second file transfer engine may receive the new version firmware and save the new version firmware to a file store. The file transfer manager may download the new version firmware from the second file transfer engine and/or the file store, and download the new version firmware to an appropriate field device or field devices of the one or more field devices. The second versioning job processor may update the file transfer manager about transfer tasks.
The second query engine may respond to one or more queries from the first query engine regarding an inventory of the one or more field devices to determine the appropriate field device or field devices. An appropriate field device may be a device that has a present version firmware that is replaceable or upgradeable with the new version firmware.
The file transfer manager may further update the second versioning job processor with a current status of transfer operations of the new version firmware to the appropriate field device or field devices.
The site controller may incorporate a communication engine that receives the new version firmware from the second transfer engine and transfers the new version firmware to the appropriate field device or field devices. The one or more field devices may report a new version firmware status to the site controller via the communication engine.
The one or more field devices may incorporate input/output modules, electronic thermostats, and/or lighting control units. The one or more field devices may incorporate one or more model types. Firmware for one model type may be different than firmware for another model type. The new version firmware may be an acceptable version for firmware of just one model type of field devices.
A user interface may permit a user to load the new version firmware, configure and initiate a deployment job for the new version firmware, and monitor the deployment job. The first versioning job processor may initiate a transfer of the new version firmware from the supervisor to the at least one site controller, and update a history log of a versioning job status.
In the present specification, some of the matter may be of a hypothetical or prophetic nature although stated in another manner or tense.
Although the present system and/or approach has been described with respect to at least one illustrative example, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the related art to include all such variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4110827 | Shavit | Aug 1978 | A |
4130874 | Pai | Dec 1978 | A |
4153936 | Scmitz et al. | May 1979 | A |
4419667 | Gurr et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4850010 | Stanbury et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4937760 | Beitel et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5341142 | Reis et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5500561 | Wilhelm | Mar 1996 | A |
5566084 | Cmar | Oct 1996 | A |
5572438 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5598349 | Elliason et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5719854 | Choudhury et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5822553 | Gifford et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5892758 | Argyroudis | Apr 1999 | A |
6026375 | Hall et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6195367 | Jakobik et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209018 | Ben-shachar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6252950 | Duty et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259723 | Miyashita | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278717 | Arsenault et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289384 | Whipple et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6366926 | Pohlmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6446136 | Pohlmann et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6519509 | Nierlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529723 | Bentley | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535817 | Krishnamurti et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6566926 | Patterson | May 2003 | B1 |
6574581 | Bohrer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6758161 | Nohynek | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6832249 | Ciscon et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6857022 | Scanlan | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6865685 | Hammond et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6985087 | Soliman | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010700 | Foss et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7016784 | Allen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7039532 | Hunter | May 2006 | B2 |
7069309 | Dodrill et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7183910 | Alvarez et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7260616 | Cook | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7333880 | Brewster et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337237 | Salahshoor et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346467 | Bohrer et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7392115 | Schindler | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7401086 | Chorafakis et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7472301 | Ginggen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7528503 | Rognli et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7565227 | Richard et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7590746 | Slater et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7650289 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7676657 | Lindholm et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7702424 | Cannon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715951 | Forbes, Jr. et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742953 | King et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7775191 | Hou | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778738 | Taft | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797009 | Kiiskila et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806845 | Arm et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7844481 | Hilbush et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845576 | Siddaramanna et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865252 | Clayton | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873441 | Synesiou et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7885718 | Yano et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7886166 | Shnekendorf et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7925384 | Huizenga | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941528 | Hicks, III et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954726 | Siddaramanna et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7958229 | Conway | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8023410 | O'Neill | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8073558 | Koch et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091794 | Siddaramanna et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8140279 | Subbloie | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140658 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8143811 | Shloush et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8163276 | Hedrick et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170774 | Forte et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8183995 | Wang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199773 | Aubin et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8232745 | Chemel et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234017 | Ahn | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234876 | Parsonnet et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260468 | Ippolito et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8260469 | Gregory et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8260650 | Miller | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8291243 | Castelli et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295989 | Rettger et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305380 | Gotwalt et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8312299 | Tremel et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8321302 | Bauer et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8321950 | Oran | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8327024 | Pattison et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8330762 | Grossman | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8352094 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373547 | Benya et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386086 | Roux et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8406937 | Verfuerth et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412654 | Montalvo | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8417391 | Rombouts et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8565903 | Koch et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8595094 | Forbes, Jr. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8626354 | Walter et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630744 | Walter et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639214 | Fujisaki | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8676273 | Fujisaki | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8676953 | Koch | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8700187 | Forbes, Jr. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8782190 | Koch | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8868925 | Wyatt et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8879488 | Pavlovski et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9183522 | Koch | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20030016237 | Hickey | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033230 | Mccall | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030069752 | LeDain et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030233064 | Arm et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040034484 | Solomita, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040137897 | Teixeira | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040203649 | Cashiola | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050027636 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050152694 | Chown | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172304 | Tavares et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194456 | Tessier et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229220 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050262026 | Watkins | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070005195 | Pasquale et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055999 | Radom et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070222295 | Wareham et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080011864 | Tessier et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046715 | Balazs et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080114638 | Colliau et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080167931 | Gerstemeier et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177678 | Di Martini et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080255760 | Rojicek et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262848 | Shienbrood et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090046625 | Diener et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090187499 | Mulder et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198384 | Ahn | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204458 | Wiese et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204977 | Tavares et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249090 | Schmitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271255 | Utter et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281674 | Taft | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295594 | Yoon | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090297488 | Fraser et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313083 | Dillon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319090 | Dillon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100057480 | Arfin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076615 | Daniel et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076835 | Silverman | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106342 | Ko et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106543 | Marti | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114340 | Huizenga et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138363 | Batterberry et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168924 | Tessier et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100274377 | Kaufman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100283606 | Tsypin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324962 | Nesler et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016200 | Koch | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040550 | Graber et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040666 | Crabtree et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046805 | Bedros et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110093493 | Nair et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110113068 | Ouyang | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125542 | Koch | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172836 | Boss et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172838 | Pai et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196539 | Nair et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196546 | Muller et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110199209 | Siddaramanna et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202910 | Venkatakrishnan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212700 | Petite | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231320 | Irving | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110301774 | Koch | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120066397 | Koch et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066686 | Koch | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084696 | Marti | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120093141 | Imes et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101653 | Tran | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109399 | Tran | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136915 | Koch et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120173030 | Taft | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197456 | Walter et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197457 | Walter et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197458 | Walter et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120245968 | Beaulieu et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120271473 | Koch | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277920 | Koch | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130035992 | Silverman | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047010 | Massey et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130079931 | Wanchoo et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130123996 | Matos | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144451 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130254151 | Mohagheghi et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140122181 | Fisera et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149973 | Walter et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140277769 | Matsuoka et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277795 | Matsuoka et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278687 | McConky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150134280 | Narayan et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150170171 | McCurnin et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012118982 | Jun 2012 | JP |
WO 2005033964 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2008027455 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008027457 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2009006133 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009020606 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009023230 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009027617 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009085610 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2011065007 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2013025565 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO 2013055551 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Demand Response Measurement and Verification Literature Review,” 29 pages, prior to Nov. 29, 2012. |
“Smart Demand Response: A Discussion Paper,” Energy Networks Association, energyuk, 44 pages, prior to Nov. 29, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT ApplicationSerial No. pct/us2012/058537, International Filing Date Oct. 3, 2012. |
Hunt, “Automated Demand Response System and Advanced End-Use Services Platform,” Optimal Technologies, 31, pages, Sep. 24, 2004. |
Olson, “New Approaches in Automating and Optimizing Demand Response to Solve Peak Load Management Problems,” Building IQ brochure, 8 pages, 2011. |
Schisler et al., “The Role of Demand Response in Ancillary Services Markets,” IEEE, 3 pages, 2008. |
Violette et al., “DRR Valuation and Market Analysis vol. II: Assessing the DRR Benefits and Costs,” Summit Blue Consulting, 112 pages, Jan. 6, 2006. |
Zaidi et al., “Load Recognition for Automated Demand Response in Microgrids,” IEEE, pp. 2436-2439, 2010. |
Autogrid, “Austin Energy and AutoGrid Systems Collaborate on Standards-Based Automated Demand Response to Usher in a New Era of Retail Choice for the Demand Response Market,” 5 pages, Feb. 26, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/939,935, filed Jul. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/940,043, filed Jul. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/940,066, filed Jul. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/940,090, filed Jul. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/056,902, filed Oct. 17, 2013. |
Santacana et al., “Getting Smart, With a Clearer Vision of Intelligent Grid, Control Emerges from Chaos,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, pp. 41-48, Mar./Apr. 2010. |
Abdullah et al., “Demand-Side Energy Management Performed Using Direct Feedback via Mobile Systems: Enables Utilities to Deploy Consumer Based Demand Response Programs,” 2010 IEEE International Energy Conference and Exhibition, pp. 172-177, 2010. |
Coughlin et al., “Estimating Demand Response Load Impacts: Evaluation of Baseline Load Models for Non-Residential Buildings in California,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-63728, 33 pages, Jan. 2008. |
European Search Report for Related Application No. EP 12169650.4, Dated Nov. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,195, filed Sep. 15, 2012. |
Cruz, “Tutorial on GPU Computing with an Introduction to CUDA,” 37 pages, prior to Nov. 17, 2011. |
Holmberg, “Facility Interface to the Smart Grid,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, 7 pages, printed 2012. |
Honeywell, “Automated Demand Response—Southern California Program,” 2 pages, printed Aug. 1, 2011. |
Honeywell, “The Perfect Response to Peak Events,” 4 pages, Nov. 2010. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demand—response, “Demand Response,” 10 pages, printed Feb. 3, 2012. |
https://buildingsolutions.honeywell.com/Cultures/en-US/Markets/Utilities/DemandResponse/, 1page, printed Feb. 3, 2012. |
Kiliccote et al., “Findings from Seven Years of Field Performance Data for Automated Demand Response in Commercial Buildings,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-3643E, May 2010. |
Kiliccote et al., “Open Automated Demand Response for Small Commercial Buildings,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-2195E, 104 pages, Jul. 2009. |
Kiliccote et al., “Open Automated Demand Response Communications in Demand Response for Wholesale Ancillary Services,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-2945E, 13 pages, Nov. 2009. |
Koch et al., “Architecture Concepts and Technical Issues for an Open, Interoperable Automated Demand Response Infrastructure,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-63664, 7 pages, Oct. 2007. |
Koch et al., “Direct Versus Facility Centric Load Control for Automated Demand Response,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-2905E, 11 pages, Nov. 2009. |
Koch et al., “Scenarios for Consuming Standardized Automated Demand Response Signals,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-1362E, 10 pages, Nov. 2008. |
Koch, “The Demand Response Automation Server (DRAS),” Building Performance, http://www.akuacom.com/assets/pdf/ASHRAE—2008—Ed—Koch.pdf, 18 pages, prior to Nov. 17, 2011. |
Piette et al., “Automated Critical Peak Pricing Field Tests: 2006 Pilot Program Description and Results,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-62218, 67 pages, Aug. 2007. |
Piette et al., “Automated Critical Peak Pricing Field Tests: Program Description and Results,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-59351, Apr. 2006. |
Piette et al., “Design and Implementation of an Open, Interoperable Automated Demand Response Infrastructure,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-63665, 6 pages, Oct. 2007. |
Piette et al., “Findings From the 2004 Fully Automated Demand Response Tests in Large Facilities,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-58178, 197 pages, Sep. 2005. |
Piette et al., “Linking Continuous Energy Management and Open Automated Demand Response,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-1361E, 9 pages, Nov. 2008. |
Piette et al., “Open Automated Demand Response Communications Specification,” Version 1.0, CEC-500-2009-063, 214 pages, Apr. 2009. |
Piette et al., “Participation through Automation: Fully Automated Critical Peak Pricing in Commercial Buildings,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-60614, 14 pages, Aug. 13-18, 2006. |
Watson et al., “Machine to Machine (M2M) Technology in Demand Responsive Commercial Buildings,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-55087, 18 pages, Aug. 2004. |
Yin et al., “Auto-DR and Pre-Cooling of Buildings at Tri-City Corporate Center,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-3348, 140 pages, Nov. 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,193, filed Oct. 28, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/224,744, filed Mar. 25, 2014. |
“Executive Summary,” 1 page, prior to Sep. 2007. |
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), “Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering,” 92 pages, Sep. 2007. |
http://www.akuacom.com/solutions/index.html, “Akuacom—Automated Demand Response,” 2 pages, printed Feb. 3, 2012. |
http://www.naesb.org/pdf3/dsmee012308213.doc, “Demand Response Measurement and Verification Literature Review,” 29 pages, created Jan. 14, 2008, modified Dec. 18, 2012. |
Couper, “Optimizing Demand Response to Improve Economic Dispatch and Reliability,” downloaded from http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/euw03026usen/EUW03026USEN.PDF, 5 pages, prior to Dec. 11, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140149973 A1 | May 2014 | US |