1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system and method employing algorithms and protocols for optimizing carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) in wireless communications networks. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for providing enhanced CSMA/CA which improves channel availability and quality of service (QoS) in a wireless communications network, such as an ad-hoc wireless communication network.
2. Description of the Related Art
In 1987, Apple was awarded U.S. Pat. No. 4,661,902, the contents of which is incorporated by reference herein, for a CSMA protocol for wired LANs based on a request to send/clear to send (RTS/CTS) exchange (referred to as “AppleTalk”). The CSMA scheme allows multiple devices to share a common resource (i.e., the same physical cable) for communication. Such a scheme is very effective when the communication takes the form of bursts of packets rather than a constant stream of data, such as time division multiplex (TDM) voice.
In 1991, Proxim was awarded U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,634 entitled “Medium Access Protocol for Wireless LANs”, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference, that describes an enhanced carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) protocol for a wireless local area network (LAN). The protocol specifically addresses the hidden terminal problem that exists in wireless networks, in which not all terminals are aware of each others existence and the transmissions that each other are making. The protocol also includes an attempt to derive a fairness of access so that the terminals closest to each other do not monopolize the radio link.
The ITT HandHeld Multimedia Terminal (HMT) system as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,943,322 to Mayor, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference, also uses a form of enhanced CSMA/CA protocol which includes the RTS/CTS as defined by Apple. The HMT technology allows each wireless terminal to function as an independent, intelligent router and repeater. Its ad hoc networking provides for a self-organizing and self-healing network structure. The HMT system is a significant improvement over the protocol described in the Proxim patent in a number of ways. Specifically, the HMT system is designed for use by a self forming/self healing network of highly mobile devices in which a simple RTS/CTS is insufficient as described below. Also, the HMT system introduces the concept of three data channels with a common reservation channel to optimize the use of the radio frequency (RF) spectrum. The Proxim protocol does not do this presumably because of the low mobility of the terminals in a wireless LAN and the probability of a large number of interferers being limited by lack of free space propagation. That is, wireless LANs are typically deployed in buildings where walls create natural barriers to RF propagation. However, in the highly mobile open air environment, this assumption is not reasonable.
The Proxim protocol also uses an RTS/CTS and data packet exchange in a common channel. In accordance with this process, no other terminal can use the radio resource while the exchange is occurring or during the back-off period that they define, which results in very low efficiency of the radio resource. As discussed above, the HMT system employs a mechanism with a single shared reservation channel on which all RTS/CTS communication occurs, and three data channels are used for the actual sending of data. As part of the RTS/CTS exchange, the terminals agree on a data channel to use. Accordingly, while a single pair of terminals is transmitting a data packet on one data channel, other terminals can correspond over the reservation channel to set up a packet exchange on another data channel. The result is that the overall efficiency of the network in terms of packets sent per second is much higher.
Although the HMT system operates well for its intended purpose, the system was designed for a military application where all terminals knew about all others (i.e., an all informed network). However, it would be beneficial to employ these techniques in a network in which each terminal does not necessarily have information about each other terminal. Accordingly, a need exists for an improved CSMA/CA protocol suitable for use with such a network.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an enhanced CSMA/CA protocol suitable for use in an ad-hoc wireless communication network.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a system and method for achieving enhanced CSMA/CA which improves channel availability and quality of service (QoS) in a wireless communications network, such as an ad-hoc wireless communication network.
These and other objects are substantially achieved by a system and method for establishing channels to enable communication between nodes in a communication network, such as a wireless ad-hoc communication network. The system and method perform the operations of determining an average time length of message data packets being communicated between nodes in the communication network, and determining a time length of a request to send message transmitted by a transmitting node to request clearance to send a message data packet to a destination node, and a time length of a clear to send message transmitted by the destination node to said transmitting node to indicate clearance to send the message data packet. The system and method further perform the operation of establishing a number of data communication channels based on a relationship between the average time length of message data packets and the time lengths of the request to send and clear to send messages. More particularly, the system and method establish a number of data communication channels equal to an integer value determined based on a value representing the average time length of message data packets divided by the sum of a value representing the time length of the request to send message and a value representing the time length of the clear to send message. The system and method further broadcast data indicating the number of data communication channels to the nodes.
These and other objects are further substantially achieved by providing a system and method for controlling a node of a communication network to send a data packet to a destination node in said communication network. The system and method perform the operations of controlling the node to attempt to send the data packet to the destination node; and if the node determines that the destination node has not received the data packet, the node places the data packet at a location in a queue for retransmission based on a type of information contained in the data packet, with the location being indicative of a duration of time that the node will delay before attempting to resend the data packet to the destination node. The duration of time is shorter when the information includes voice data than when the information includes no voice data. Also, while the data packet is in the queue, the system and method control the node to refrain from sending other data packets to the destination node, while also allowing the node to send another data packet to another destination node.
These and other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will be more readily appreciated from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The following describes a network capable of employing the HMT technology in very large commercial applications having a very large number of terminals and servicing very large geographic areas. In doing so, the network employs a number of architectural changes to the basic HMT system as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/897,790 entitled “Ad Hoc Peer-to-Peer Mobile Radio Access System Interfaced to the PSTN and Cellular Networks”, filed on Jun. 29, 2001, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
As can be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the nodes 102, 106 and 107 are capable of communicating with each other directly, or via one or more other nodes 102, 106 or 107 operating as a router or routers for packets being sent between nodes, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/897,790 cited above, and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/815,157 entitled “Time Division Protocol for an Ad-Hoc, Peer-to-Peer Radio Network Having Coordinating Channel Access to Shared Parallel Data Channels with Separate Reservation Channel”, filed on Mar. 22, 2001, the entire content of both applications being incorporated herein by reference. Each node 102, 106 and 107 shown in
As shown in
Each node 102, 106 and 107 further includes a memory 114, such as a random access memory (RAM), that is capable of storing, among other things, routing information pertaining to itself and other nodes in the network 100. The nodes 102, 106 and 107 exchange their respective routing information, referred to as routing advertisements or routing table information, with each other via a broadcasting mechanism periodically, for example, when a new node enters the network 100, or when existing nodes in the network 100 move.
As further shown in
As will now be described, each node 102, 106 and 107 can communicate over plural data channels as well as a reservation channel. These channels are not limited to any particular architecture or configuration, so long as each node 102, 106 and 107 has the ability to access the channels. The channels can exist over any communication medium, such as wire, optical fiber, or wireless (over-the-air), and may employ any suitable transmission protocol.
When a node, for example, node 102-1, wishes to transmit a message to another node, for example, node 102-2, node 102-1 transmits a Request-to-Send (RTS) message to node 102-2 in order to notify node 102-2 and other nodes 102 and 106 of its intent to reserve one of the available data channels. The transmitting node 102-1 will then receive a Clear-To-Send (CTS) message from the destination node 102-2 if the destination node 102-2 receives the RTS message. The transmitting node 102-1 then transmits the data in the form of a packet. The transmitting node 102-1 then receives an acknowledgement message (ACK) transmitted from the receiving node 102-2 if the receiving node receives the data packet.
As shown in
Upon receiving the RTS from node 102-1 on the reservation channel, assuming a data channel is available, node 102-2 replies to node 102-1 with a CTS message on the reservation channel. Upon receiving the CTS message, node 102-1 then transmits the information message to node 102-2 on the available data channel, for example, data channel 1. Because channel access requests are transmitted on the separate reservation channel, another node 102, 106 or 107 can transmit an RTS message shortly after a previous RTS/CTS exchange is completed without waiting for the subsequent information message to be completed.
For example, as further shown in
As will now be described, the network 100 employs a methodology which recognizes a direct correlation between the number of data channels and the average size of the data packets. Specifically, if the average size (meaning average length of transmission time) of the data packet gets smaller and approaches the size of an RTS/CTS combination (meaning combined duration of time for the RTS/CTS exchange), the number of data channels that the reservation channel can efficiently support decreases. Conversely, as the average size of the data packet increases relative to the RTS/CTS combination, the number of data channels that can be supported increases. As stated above,
In the Apple, Proxim and HMT systems the number of data channels was fixed. For the Apple and Proxim systems, the number is one. For the HMT system, the number of data channels is three.
On the contrary, the present network 100 has the capability for the number of data channels to be between 1 and n (where n represents an integer value of the length of time to transmit an average size message data packet divided by the length of time to perform an RTS+CTS message exchange). For purposes of this explanation, the length of time to transmit an average size message data packet will be represented in bytes, and the length of time to perform an RTS+CTS exchange will also be represented in bytes. It should be noted that the transmission rate on the reservation channel over which the RTS/CTS message exchange occurs is typically lower than the transmission rate on a data channel over which the data packet is transmitted. However, this is taken into account for purposes of this example when representing the time lengths of the messages as a number of bytes. For example, if the average size of a message data packet is 1200 bytes (meaning the duration of transmission time is equal to the length of time necessary to send 1200 bytes over a data channel, which will be referred to in the shorthand form “time length” of the message data packet) and the length of an RTS+CTS message exchange is 200 bytes (meaning the duration of transmission time to perform the RTS/CTS exchange on the reservation channel, when modified to take into account the slower transmission rate of the reservation channel, is equivalent to the length of time necessary to send 200 bytes over a data channel, which will be referred to as the “time length” of the RTX and CTS messages), then n would equal six. Likewise, if the average size (time length) of a message data packet is 1500 bytes and the time length of an RTS+CTS exchange is 200 bytes, then n would equal seven. The actual number of data channels in use will be a system parameter that is broadcast amongst the nodes 102, 106 and 107. However, it is also noted that the amount of available RF spectrum may limit the options to something less than the ideal number. As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/897,790 referenced above, a mobile Internet switching center (MiSC), as well as IAPs 106 in the network 100 can include software which enable them to analyze the packets that are transmitted by the nodes 102, 106 and 107 and determine an average packet size. This allows the network 100 to dynamically change the number of channels that are in use almost in real time.
System Awareness in the RTS/CTS
In the network 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention, a common reservation channel shared by all nodes 102, 106 and 107 allows the network 100 to do system level configuration, coordination and provisioning. When idle, all nodes 102, 106 and 107 are listening on the reservation channel. The primary reason is to be able to gauge the level of utilization, when an application wants to send a packet, and to be ready to receive a packet from another node 102, 106 or 107. By partitioning out a small amount of the bandwidth on the reservation channel, the nodes 102, 106 and 107 can share information that is pertinent to all of them as described above. One example of this information is the number of data channels in use. Another is the location of the data channels if the available spectrum is not contiguous. Information about the identity and operation of the network 100 can be broadcast from the MiSC/IAP so that all nodes 102, 106 and 107 can cooperate in the most efficient and effective manner. It is expected that this commonly known information will assist in the overall efficiency of the network 100 in a number of additional areas as well.
Intelligent Random Backoff and Configurable Random Backoff
The Proxim system employs a random back off scheme to increase fairness of access which is based on a random allocation of a timeslot so that, statistically, all nodes 102, 106 and 107 have an equal chance of being next in the queue. For a packet data system, this is a simple and elegant solution. However, the network 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention also provides quality of service (QOS) capability that allows the network 100 to support real time services such as voice as well as traditional data services. In such a network 100, all terminals (e.g., mobile nodes 102) are created equal or essentially equal, but all packets are not. Accordingly, a different type of random back off system is needed so that the voice packets that cannot tolerate latency (i.e., delay) are not unreasonably impeded. Hence, the implementation of this aspect of the network 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention is as follows:
When the Link Layer of a node (e.g., a mobile node 102) receives a response from the media access control (MAC) that it failed to send a packet, the controller 112 of the node attempting to transmit the packet will place the packet in a retransmission queue in the memory 114, for example, of the node. There are multiple possible reasons for failure, but the most prevalent is RTS collision.
Two events occur at the node attempting to transmit when the packet is placed in a queue. First, the destination of the packet is blocked. Thus, the controller 112 of the node will also put any other packets for that destination into a queue. This allows the node to continue to send data packets to other destinations, on other data channels, while waiting for the appropriate time to try retransmission to the blocked destination. Second, the amount of time that the node will wait is dependent on the type of packet being transmitted. In simple terms, the node will wait a short time for a low latency QOS packet (such as a voice packet) and a longer time for a best effort data packet. The methodology in the network 100 expands on the basic algorithm by using the performance measurements the network is taking to fine tune the back off algorithm and also allow for the back off to be configured manually or automatically by the network 100.
Although only a few exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the invention.
This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/324,277, filed on Sep. 25, 2001, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4494192 | Lew et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4617656 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4661902 | Hochsprung et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4736371 | Tejima et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4742357 | Rackley | May 1988 | A |
4747130 | Ho | May 1988 | A |
4774707 | Raychaudhuri | Sep 1988 | A |
4910521 | Mellon | Mar 1990 | A |
5034961 | Adams | Jul 1991 | A |
5068916 | Harrison et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5231634 | Giles et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5233604 | Ahmadi et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241542 | Natarajan et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5317566 | Joshi | May 1994 | A |
5388097 | Baugher et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392450 | Nossen | Feb 1995 | A |
5412654 | Perkins | May 1995 | A |
5424747 | Chazelas et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5457680 | Kamm et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5502722 | Fulghum | Mar 1996 | A |
5517491 | Nanni et al. | May 1996 | A |
5555425 | Zeller et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555540 | Radke | Sep 1996 | A |
5572528 | Shuen | Nov 1996 | A |
5615212 | Ruszczyk et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618045 | Kagan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621732 | Osawa | Apr 1997 | A |
5623495 | Eng et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627976 | McFarland et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631897 | Pacheco et al. | May 1997 | A |
5644576 | Bauchot et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652751 | Sharony | Jul 1997 | A |
5677909 | Heide | Oct 1997 | A |
5680392 | Semaan | Oct 1997 | A |
5684794 | Lopez et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687194 | Paneth et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696903 | Mahany | Dec 1997 | A |
5701294 | Ward et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706428 | Boer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717689 | Ayanoglu | Feb 1998 | A |
5745483 | Nakagawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774876 | Wooley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781540 | Malcolm et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787080 | Hulyalkar et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794154 | Bar-On et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796732 | Mazzola et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796741 | Saito et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805593 | Busche | Sep 1998 | A |
5805842 | Nagaraj et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805977 | Hill et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809518 | Lee | Sep 1998 | A |
5822309 | Ayanoglu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5844905 | McKay et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845097 | Kang et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852630 | Langberg et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857084 | Klein | Jan 1999 | A |
5870350 | Bertin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870388 | Yung et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877724 | Davis | Mar 1999 | A |
5881095 | Cadd | Mar 1999 | A |
5881372 | Kruys | Mar 1999 | A |
5886992 | Raatikainen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896561 | Schrader et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903559 | Acharya et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909651 | Chander et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5936953 | Simmons | Aug 1999 | A |
5943322 | Mayor et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5987011 | Toh | Nov 1999 | A |
5987033 | Boer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991279 | Haugli et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018516 | Packer | Jan 2000 | A |
6028853 | Haartsen | Feb 2000 | A |
6029217 | Arimilli et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034542 | Ridgeway | Mar 2000 | A |
6044062 | Brownrigg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047330 | Stracke, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052594 | Chuang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052752 | Kwon | Apr 2000 | A |
6064626 | Stevens | May 2000 | A |
6067291 | Kamerman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073005 | Raith et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078566 | Kikinis | Jun 2000 | A |
6104712 | Robert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108738 | Chambers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115580 | Chuprun et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122690 | Nannetti et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130881 | Stiller et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132306 | Trompower | Oct 2000 | A |
6147975 | Bowman-Amuah | Nov 2000 | A |
6163699 | Naor et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178337 | Spartz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192053 | Angelico et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192230 | Van Bokhorst et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208870 | Lorello et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223240 | Odenwald et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240294 | Hamilton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246875 | Seazholtz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249516 | Brownrigg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275707 | Reed et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285892 | Hulyalkar | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304556 | Haas | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327300 | Souissi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349091 | Li | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349210 | Li | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363065 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6404756 | Whitehill et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6529520 | Lee et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6658009 | Yamashita et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665311 | Kondylis et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6671260 | Engstrand | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6836469 | Wu | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6963545 | Ho | Nov 2005 | B1 |
20010053699 | McCrady et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2132180 | Mar 1996 | CA |
0513841 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0627827 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0924890 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0973298 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0993211 | Apr 2000 | EP |
0994604 | Apr 2000 | EP |
2683326 | Jul 1993 | FR |
WO 9608884 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9724005 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9839936 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9912302 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0034932 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0110154 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0133770 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0133770 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0135567 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0137481 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0137482 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0137483 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0235253 | May 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030058886 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60324277 | Sep 2001 | US |