This invention relates generally to synthetic radar systems, and more particularly to tomographic 3-dimensional imaging systems.
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems exploit the motion of antennas arranged on a moving platform to synthesize a large virtual aperture and, thus, achieve high resolution imaging. Each virtual array at different spatial location forms a baseline. A single pass (single baseline) SAR system is capable of imaging a 2-dimensional (2D) range-azimuth reflectivity of an area of interest without any elevation resolution. However, the 3-dimensional (3D) structure of the area, such as 3D terrain features, is not preserved.
The 2D image is essentially a projection of the 3D reflectivity space into the 2D range-azimuth imaging plane. This projection can cause several artifacts. For example, in layover artifacts, several terrain patches with different elevation angles are mapped in the same range-azimuth resolution cell, see Gini et al, “Layover solution in multibaseline SAR interferometry,” IEEE Trans. Antennas and propagation, vol. 38(4), pp. 1344-1356, October 2002.
In shadowing artifacts, certain areas are not visible to the SAR system because another structure is in the illumination path. These artifacts cannot be resolved by a single pass, even using interferometric SAR techniques.
With the launch of the TerraSAR-X and the COSMO-Skymed satellites, 3D imaging has become possible. Those systems exploit stacks of complex-valued SAR images from multiple passes, which are collected at different baselines and at different time, to form 3D images that capture the 3D location and motion information of scattering objects, see Fornaro et al, “Three-dimensional focusing with multipass SAR data,” IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 41(3), pp. 507-517, March 2003.
As shown in
With the additional elevation dimension, the 3D image can separate multiple scatterers along elevation, even when the scatterers are present in the same range-azimuth location. However, 3D imagery requires several trade-offs. First, to acquire images at multiple baselines, the platform needs to perform several passes over the area of interest. This makes data collection time consuming and very expensive. Second, the elevation resolution is much worse than that of range and azimuth due to the small elevation aperture, which is known as a tight orbital tube, of modern SAR sensors, e.g., ≈500 m diameter.
The elevation resolution can be improved using compressive sensing (CS) based approaches, see Zhu et al. “Tomographic SAR inversion by L1-norm regularization—the compressive sensing approach,” IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 48(10), pp. 3839-3846, October 2010. That CS approach uses multiple baselines, a single PRF of a single SAR platform. In that method, a 2D range-azimuth image is reconstructed for each baseline. Then, compressive sensing based method is used improve elevation resolution. That method only considers sparsity for each 2D range-azimuth pixel.
The embodiments of the invention provide a compressive sensing sensing (CS) based method for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging. The method reduces the total amount of raw data that need to be acquired, and increases a resolution of elevation. In particular, the embodiments use SAR data collected at multiple parallel baselines in an azimuth-elevation plane. The resolution in elevation is substantially higher than for a conventional 3D SAR system. The increase is about 4 times.
The elevation of each baseline is randomly distributed in an available elevation space. In addition, the antenna array at each baseline uses a fixed pulse repetition frequency (PRF) or pulse repetition rate (PRR), which is the number of pulses per time unit (e.g., seconds). The PRF for each baseline is different. Therefore, the multiple baselines provide flexibility for data acquisition. For example, the data can be acquired during multiple passes of a single SAR platform or from different SAR platforms. Assuming all the baselines are aligned and located in the spatial domain, the multi-baseline data can be used to generate a high resolution 3D reflectivity map, using a CS-based iterative imaging method.
The embodiments provide several advantages. In particular, using the CS-based method, 3D reflectivity can be generated using only a very small number of baselines, which saves time and expense for data collection. Second, by jointly processing data with different PRFs, it becomes possible to fuse data, not only from multiple passes of a single SAR platform, but also from multiple radar platforms. With multiple platforms, it is possible to form a much larger virtual elevation aperture compared to a single SAR platform, resulting a much higher elevation resolution, e.g., 4 times the elevation resolution of a conventional 3D SAR system.
The method is related to 3D tomographic SAR imaging and CS-based SAR imaging, but with novel contributions. In contrast to earlier efforts, the embodiments allow multiple different PRFs in the multi-baseline data, which extends the data source from a single SAR platform to multiple platforms and enables a much larger elevation aperture. In addition, the embodiments provide a novel CS-based iterative imaging method that operates directly on the acquired raw data.
As shown in
For the purpose of this description, we consider point scatterers 302 as well as 3D objects placed in a 3D space. We consider a total of 70 baselines randomly distributed in space along elevation direction. These baselines are selected from 281 possible baselines, uniformly spaced along the elevation, see
In our simulation, we only need 25% of total baselines needed for a conventional 3D SAR system, yet we can increase the elevation resolution by about 4 times.
At each baseline, the SAR raw data sets are acquired with a fixed PRF. However, for different baseline, the corresponding PRF is randomly selected to be different than other PRF. Specifically, starting with a base PRF, data sets from all baselines are downsampled by a random integer amount. In other words, each PRF is a fraction of the base PRF. With the downsampling rate randomly selected from a set {2, 3, 4, 5}. We assume all the data sets are perfectly aligned.
We compare two different approaches. A first conventional approach uses reduced data collection at 70 baselines, each with different PRF, and conventional imaging methods. In the approach according to the embodiment, we use reduced data collection and our CS-based imaging approach. For the conventional 3D imaging, we use a near-field range migration imaging procedure by upsampling the data and filling the missing data with zeros. That procedure produces a fast beamforming result from the acquired data and implements an inverse of the acquisition operator.
For CS-based imaging, we fill in the missing data using an iterative procedure that exploits the sparsity of the scene, and then perform fast range-migration imaging.
As shown in
The data sets 401 are registered and aligned 410 to produce aligned data sets 415. After the alignment, CS-base 3D image reconstruction is applied directly 420 to the aligned multiple-baseline, multiple-PRF data sets 415 to obtain the 3D SAR image 430.
Although the invention has been described by way of examples of preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that various other adaptations and modifications can be made within the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such variations and modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5659318 | Madsen | Aug 1997 | A |
6476755 | Senio | Nov 2002 | B1 |
7928893 | Baraniuk et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8471759 | Sun et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20120250748 | Nguyen | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
F. Gini, F. Lombardini, and M. Montanari, “Layover solution in multibaseline SAR interferometry,” IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 38(4), pp. 1344-1356, Oct. 2002. |
G. Fornaro, F. Serafino, and F. Soldovieri, “Three-dimensional focusing with multipass SAR data,” IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 41(3), pp. 507-517, Mar. 2003. |
X. X. Zhu and R. Bamler, “Tomographic SAR inversion by L1-norm regularization—the compressive sensing approach,” IEEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 48(10), pp. 3839-3846, Oct. 2010. |
J. M. Lopez-Sanchez and J. Fortuny-Guasch, “3-D imaging using range migration techniques,” IEEE Trans. antennas and propagation, vol. 48(5), pp. 728-737, May 2000. |
X. Zhuge and A. G. Yarovoy, “Three-dimensional near-field MIMO array imaging using range migration techniques,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 21(6), pp. 3026-3033, Jun. 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150253423 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |