Patent Grant
10727768
The subject matter disclosed herein relates to gas turbine systems and, more specifically, to gas turbine driven power plants.
Gas turbine engines are used in a wide variety of applications, such as power generation, aircraft, and various machinery. Gas turbine engine generally combust a fuel with an oxidant (e.g., air) in a combustor section to generate hot combustion products, which then drive one or more turbine stages of a turbine section. In turn, the turbine section drives one or more compressor stages of a compressor section, thereby compressing oxidant for intake into the combustor section along with the fuel. Again, the fuel and oxidant mix in the combustor section, and then combust to produce the hot combustion products. These combustion products may include unburnt fuel, residual oxidant, and various emissions (e.g., nitrogen oxides) depending on the condition of combustion. Furthermore, gas turbine engines typically consume a vast amount of air as the oxidant, and output a considerable amount of exhaust gas into the atmosphere. In other words, the exhaust gas is typically wasted as a byproduct of the gas turbine operation.
Certain embodiments commensurate in scope with the originally claimed invention are summarized below. These embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed invention, but rather these embodiments are intended only to provide a brief summary of possible forms of the invention. Indeed, the invention may encompass a variety of forms that may be similar to or different from the embodiments set forth below.
In an embodiment, a method includes combusting a fuel and an oxidant in a combustor of an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) gas turbine system that produces electrical power and provides a portion of the electrical power to an electrical grid. The method includes controlling one or more parameters of the EGR gas turbine system to increase the portion of the electrical power provided to the electrical grid in response to a transient event associated with the electrical grid. Furthermore, controlling includes one or more of: (A) increasing a flow rate of fuel to the combustor in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in a fuel-lean combustion mode; (B) increasing a concentration and/or the flow rate of the oxidant in the combustor in response to the transient event, and increasing a flow rate of the fuel to the combustor in response to the increased concentration and/or flow rate of the oxidant to maintain a substantially stoichiometric equivalence ratio in the combustor; or (C) decreasing a local consumption of the electrical power in response to the transient event to increase the portion of electrical power provided to the electrical grid.
In another embodiment, a system includes an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) gas turbine system having a combustor configured to receive and combust a fuel with an oxidant and a turbine driven by combustion products from the combustor. The system includes a generator driven by the turbine, wherein the generator is configured to generate electrical power and to export a portion of the electrical power to an electrical grid. The system includes a control system having a closed-loop controller configured to control one or more parameters of the EGR gas turbine system and an open-loop controller configured to temporarily control the one or more parameters of the EGR gas turbine system to increase the portion of the electrical power exported to the electrical grid in response to a transient event. Further, the open-loop controller is configured to: provide control signals to increase a flow rate of fuel to the combustor in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in a non-emissions compliant mode; and provide control signals to increase a concentration of the oxidant in the combustor, or decrease a local consumption of the electrical power, or both, in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in an emissions compliant mode.
In another embodiment, a non-transitory, computer readable medium stores instructions executable by a processor of an electronic device. The instructions include instructions to determine that a transient event is occurring in an electrical grid coupled to an EGR gas turbine system, wherein the transient event is an under-frequency or an under-voltage event. The instructions also include instructions to increase a flow rate of fuel to a combustor of the EGR gas turbine system in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in a non-stoichiometric combustion mode. The instructions further include instructions to increase a flow rate of oxidant to the combustor before increasing the flow rate of fuel to the combustor, or to decrease a local consumption of the electrical power to increase a portion of the electrical power that is exported to the attached electrical grid, or both, in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in a stoichiometric combustion mode.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in an engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions are made to achieve the specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and/or business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
Detailed example embodiments are disclosed herein. However, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are merely representative for purposes of describing example embodiments. Embodiments of the present invention may, however, be embodied in many alternate forms, and should not be construed as limited to only the embodiments set forth herein.
Accordingly, while example embodiments are capable of various modifications and alternative forms, embodiments thereof are illustrated by way of example in the figures and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intent to limit example embodiments to the particular forms disclosed, but to the contrary, example embodiments are to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the present invention.
The terminology used herein is for describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of example embodiments. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “includes” and/or “including”, when used herein, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Although the terms first, second, primary, secondary, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, but not limiting to, a first element could be termed a second element, and, similarly, a second element could be termed a first element, without departing from the scope of example embodiments. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any, and all, combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
Certain terminology may be used herein for the convenience of the reader only and is not to be taken as a limitation on the scope of the invention. For example, words such as “upper”, “lower”, “left”, “right”, “front”, “rear”, “top”, “bottom”, “horizontal”, “vertical”, “upstream”, “downstream”, “fore”, “aft”, and the like; merely describe the configuration shown in the FIGS. Indeed, the element or elements of an embodiment of the present invention may be oriented in any direction and the terminology, therefore, should be understood as encompassing such variations unless specified otherwise.
As discussed in detail below, the disclosed embodiments relate generally to gas turbine systems with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), and particularly stoichiometric operation of the gas turbine systems using EGR. For example, the gas turbine systems may be configured to recirculate the exhaust gas along an exhaust recirculation path, stoichiometrically combust fuel and oxidant along with at least some of the recirculated exhaust gas, and capture the exhaust gas for use in various target systems. The recirculation of the exhaust gas along with stoichiometric combustion may help to increase the concentration level of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the exhaust gas, which can then be post treated to separate and purify the CO2 and nitrogen (N2) for use in various target systems. The gas turbine systems also may employ various exhaust gas processing (e.g., heat recovery, catalyst reactions, etc.) along the exhaust recirculation path, thereby increasing the concentration level of CO2, reducing concentration levels of other emissions (e.g., carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and unburnt hydrocarbons), and increasing energy recovery (e.g., with heat recovery units). Furthermore, the gas turbine engines may be configured to combust the fuel and oxidant with one or more diffusion flames (e.g., using diffusion fuel nozzles), premix flames (e.g., using premix fuel nozzles), or any combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the diffusion flames may help to maintain stability and operation within certain limits for stoichiometric combustion, which in turn helps to increase production of CO2. For example, a gas turbine system operating with diffusion flames may enable a greater quantity of EGR, as compared to a gas turbine system operating with premix flames. In turn, the increased quantity of EGR helps to increase CO2 production. Possible target systems include pipelines, storage tanks, carbon sequestration systems, and hydrocarbon production systems, such as enhanced oil recovery (EOR) systems.
In particular, present embodiments are directed toward gas turbine systems, namely stoichiometric exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) systems including ultra-low emission technology (ULET) power plants. These systems generally include at least one gas turbine engine that is coupled to, and generates electrical power for, an electrical grid. For example, present embodiments include a ULET power plant having one or more electrical generators that convert a portion of the mechanical power provided by one or more EGR gas turbine engines into electrical power for delivery to the electrical grid. It may be appreciated that such a ULET power plant may attempt to respond to transient events (e.g., periods of rapid change in the voltage and/or frequency) in the electrical grid. For example, a ULET power plant may respond to a transient event by augmenting the mechanical power output of the one or more gas turbines in order to augment the electrical power output of the one or more generators and address the transient event. By specific example, a transient event on the electrical grid may include a frequency dip (e.g., 1% drop in the grid frequency), and a ULET power plant may increase its electrical power output (e.g., pick up 10% of the rated base load capacity of the power plant) within a certain window of time (e.g., within approximately 10 seconds of the beginning of the transient event) to address the transient event. For example, a response to the transient event may include a rapid increase in both oxidant and fuel flow to the combustors of the SEGR gas turbine system, thereby maintaining substantially stoichiometric combustion while increasing power output. Unfortunately, without the disclosed embodiments, a ULET powered by using a SEGR gas turbine system may not have any excess oxidant (e.g., air or oxygen) to enable a rapid response to the transient event, because the SEGR system operates at or near a stoichiometric ratio of fuel and oxidant.
Accordingly, as set forth in greater detail below, present embodiments are directed toward methods for controlling components of a power producing SEGR gas turbine system (e.g., a ULET power plant) to quickly increase the mechanical and/or electrical power output of the system in order to address transient events (e.g., frequency and/or voltage drops) in the attached electrical grid. In particular, certain present embodiments may enable a ULET power plant to quickly increase an amount of available oxidant in a combustor in order to quickly increase the available mechanical and electrical power of the system. Additionally, certain embodiments may enable a ULET power plant to increase an amount of available oxidant in a combustor during plant loading (e.g., during start-up) to address transient grid events that occur when the power plant is operating in a non-emission complaint mode. Other presently disclosed embodiments may enable a ULET power plant to disable certain components of the ULET power plant (e.g., a product gas compressor) in order to reduce or limit electrical power consumption within the power plant, which may temporarily increase the amount of electrical power exported from the plant to support the electrical grid during the transient event. Additionally, present embodiments enable control systems that utilize combinations of closed-loop and open-loop control strategies, and may further allow a ULET power plant to temporarily operate beyond certain programmed operational constraints or limits (e.g., a torque limit of the gas turbine engine) in order to address a transient event on the electrical grid.
With the foregoing in mind,
Accordingly, the EOR system 18 may include a fluid injection system 34, which has one or more tubulars 36 extending through a bore 38 in the earth 32 to the subterranean reservoir 20. For example, the EOR system 18 may route one or more fluids 40, such as gas, steam, water, chemicals, or any combination thereof, into the fluid injection system 34. For example, as discussed in further detail below, the EOR system 18 may be coupled to the turbine-based service system 14, such that the system 14 routes an exhaust gas 42 (e.g., substantially or entirely free of oxygen) to the EOR system 18 for use as the injection fluid 40. The fluid injection system 34 routes the fluid 40 (e.g., the exhaust gas 42) through the one or more tubulars 36 into the subterranean reservoir 20, as indicated by arrows 44. The injection fluid 40 enters the subterranean reservoir 20 through the tubular 36 at an offset distance 46 away from the tubular 28 of the oil/gas well 26. Accordingly, the injection fluid 40 displaces the oil/gas 48 disposed in the subterranean reservoir 20, and drives the oil/gas 48 up through the one or more tubulars 28 of the hydrocarbon production system 12, as indicated by arrows 50. As discussed in further detail below, the injection fluid 40 may include the exhaust gas 42 originating from the turbine-based service system 14, which is able to generate the exhaust gas 42 on-site as needed by the hydrocarbon production system 12. In other words, the turbine-based system 14 may simultaneously generate one or more services (e.g., electrical power, mechanical power, steam, water (e.g., desalinated water), and exhaust gas (e.g., substantially free of oxygen)) for use by the hydrocarbon production system 12, thereby reducing or eliminating the reliance on external sources of such services.
In the illustrated embodiment, the turbine-based service system 14 includes a stoichiometric exhaust gas recirculation (SEGR) gas turbine system 52 and an exhaust gas (EG) processing system 54. The gas turbine system 52 may be configured to operate in a stoichiometric combustion mode of operation (e.g., a stoichiometric control mode) and a non-stoichiometric combustion mode of operation (e.g., a non-stoichiometric control mode), such as a fuel-lean control mode or a fuel-rich control mode. In the stoichiometric control mode, the combustion generally occurs in a substantially stoichiometric ratio of a fuel and oxidant, thereby resulting in substantially stoichiometric combustion. In particular, stoichiometric combustion generally involves consuming substantially all of the fuel and oxidant in the combustion reaction, such that the products of combustion are substantially or entirely free of unburnt fuel and oxidant. One measure of stoichiometric combustion is the equivalence ratio, or phi (Φ), which is the ratio of the actual fuel/oxidant ratio relative to the stoichiometric fuel/oxidant ratio. An equivalence ratio of greater than 1.0 results in a fuel-rich combustion of the fuel and oxidant, whereas an equivalence ratio of less than 1.0 results in a fuel-lean combustion of the fuel and oxidant. In contrast, an equivalence ratio of 1.0 results in combustion that is neither fuel-rich nor fuel-lean, thereby substantially consuming all of the fuel and oxidant in the combustion reaction. In context of the disclosed embodiments, the term stoichiometric or substantially stoichiometric may refer to an equivalence ratio of approximately 0.95 to approximately 1.05. However, the disclosed embodiments may also include an equivalence ratio of 1.0 plus or minus 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, or more. Again, the stoichiometric combustion of fuel and oxidant in the turbine-based service system 14 may result in products of combustion or exhaust gas (e.g., 42) with substantially no unburnt fuel or oxidant remaining. For example, the exhaust gas 42 may have less than 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 percent by volume of oxidant (e.g., oxygen), unburnt fuel or hydrocarbons (e.g., HCs), nitrogen oxides (e.g., NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (e.g., SOX), hydrogen, and other products of incomplete combustion. By further example, the exhaust gas 42 may have less than approximately 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, or 5000 parts per million by volume (ppmv) of oxidant (e.g., oxygen), unburnt fuel or hydrocarbons (e.g., HCs), nitrogen oxides (e.g., NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (e.g., SOX), hydrogen, and other products of incomplete combustion. However, the disclosed embodiments also may produce other ranges of residual fuel, oxidant, and other emissions levels in the exhaust gas 42. As used herein, the terms emissions, emissions levels, and emissions targets may refer to concentration levels of certain products of combustion (e.g., NOX, CO, SOX, O2, N2, Hz, HCs, etc.), which may be present in recirculated gas streams, vented gas streams (e.g., exhausted into the atmosphere), and gas streams used in various target systems (e.g., the hydrocarbon production system 12).
Although the SEGR gas turbine system 52 and the EG processing system 54 may include a variety of components in different embodiments, the illustrated EG processing system 54 includes a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) 56 and an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system 58, which receive and process an exhaust gas 60 originating from the SEGR gas turbine system 52. The HRSG 56 may include one or more heat exchangers, condensers, and various heat recovery equipment, which collectively function to transfer heat from the exhaust gas 60 to a stream of water, thereby generating steam 62. The steam 62 may be used in one or more steam turbines, the EOR system 18, or any other portion of the hydrocarbon production system 12. For example, the HRSG 56 may generate low pressure, medium pressure, and/or high pressure steam 62, which may be selectively applied to low, medium, and high pressure steam turbine stages, or different applications of the EOR system 18. In addition to the steam 62, a treated water 64, such as a desalinated water, may be generated by the HRSG 56, the EGR system 58, and/or another portion of the EG processing system 54 or the SEGR gas turbine system 52. The treated water 64 (e.g., desalinated water) may be particularly useful in areas with water shortages, such as inland or desert regions. The treated water 64 may be generated, at least in part, due to the large volume of air driving combustion of fuel within the SEGR gas turbine system 52. While the on-site generation of steam 62 and water 64 may be beneficial in many applications (including the hydrocarbon production system 12), the on-site generation of exhaust gas 42, 60 may be particularly beneficial for the EOR system 18, due to its low oxygen content, high pressure, and heat derived from the SEGR gas turbine system 52. Accordingly, the HRSG 56, the EGR system 58, and/or another portion of the EG processing system 54 may output or recirculate an exhaust gas 66 into the SEGR gas turbine system 52, while also routing the exhaust gas 42 to the EOR system 18 for use with the hydrocarbon production system 12. Likewise, the exhaust gas 42 may be extracted directly from the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (i.e., without passing through the EG processing system 54) for use in the EOR system 18 of the hydrocarbon production system 12.
The exhaust gas recirculation is handled by the EGR system 58 of the EG processing system 54. For example, the EGR system 58 includes one or more conduits, valves, blowers, exhaust gas treatment systems (e.g., filters, particulate removal units, gas separation units, gas purification units, heat exchangers, heat recovery units, moisture removal units, catalyst units, chemical injection units, or any combination thereof), and controls to recirculate the exhaust gas along an exhaust gas circulation path from an output (e.g., discharged exhaust gas 60) to an input (e.g., intake exhaust gas 66) of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. In the illustrated embodiment, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 intakes the exhaust gas 66 into a compressor section having one or more compressors, thereby compressing the exhaust gas 66 for use in a combustor section along with an intake of an oxidant 68 and one or more fuels 70. The oxidant 68 may include ambient air, pure oxygen, oxygen-enriched air, oxygen-reduced air, oxygen-nitrogen mixtures, or any suitable oxidant that facilitates combustion of the fuel 70. The fuel 70 may include one or more gas fuels, liquid fuels, or any combination thereof. For example, the fuel 70 may include natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), syngas, methane, ethane, propane, butane, naphtha, kerosene, diesel fuel, ethanol, methanol, biofuel, or any combination thereof.
The SEGR gas turbine system 52 mixes and combusts the exhaust gas 66, the oxidant 68, and the fuel 70 in the combustor section, thereby generating hot combustion gases or exhaust gas 60 to drive one or more turbine stages in a turbine section. In certain embodiments, each combustor in the combustor section includes one or more premix fuel nozzles, one or more diffusion fuel nozzles, or any combination thereof. For example, each premix fuel nozzle may be configured to mix the oxidant 68 and the fuel 70 internally within the fuel nozzle and/or partially upstream of the fuel nozzle, thereby injecting an oxidant-fuel mixture from the fuel nozzle into the combustion zone for a premixed combustion (e.g., a premixed flame). By further example, each diffusion fuel nozzle may be configured to isolate the flows of oxidant 68 and fuel 70 within the fuel nozzle, thereby separately injecting the oxidant 68 and the fuel 70 from the fuel nozzle into the combustion zone for diffusion combustion (e.g., a diffusion flame). In particular, the diffusion combustion provided by the diffusion fuel nozzles delays mixing of the oxidant 68 and the fuel 70 until the point of initial combustion, i.e., the flame region. In embodiments employing the diffusion fuel nozzles, the diffusion flame may provide increased flame stability, because the diffusion flame generally forms at the point of stoichiometry between the separate streams of oxidant 68 and fuel 70 (i.e., as the oxidant 68 and fuel 70 are mixing). In certain embodiments, one or more diluents (e.g., the exhaust gas 60, steam, nitrogen, or another inert gas) may be pre-mixed with the oxidant 68, the fuel 70, or both, in either the diffusion fuel nozzle or the premix fuel nozzle. In addition, one or more diluents (e.g., the exhaust gas 60, steam, nitrogen, or another inert gas) may be injected into the combustor at or downstream from the point of combustion within each combustor. The use of these diluents may help temper the flame (e.g., premix flame or diffusion flame), thereby helping to reduce NOX emissions, such as nitrogen monoxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Regardless of the type of flame, the combustion produces hot combustion gases or exhaust gas 60 to drive one or more turbine stages. As each turbine stage is driven by the exhaust gas 60, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 generates a mechanical power 72 and/or an electrical power 74 (e.g., via an electrical generator). The system 52 also outputs the exhaust gas 60, and may further output water 64. Again, the water 64 may be a treated water, such as a desalinated water, which may be useful in a variety of applications on-site or off-site.
Exhaust extraction is also provided by the SEGR gas turbine system 52 using one or more extraction points 76. For example, the illustrated embodiment includes an exhaust gas (EG) supply system 78 having an exhaust gas (EG) extraction system 80 and an exhaust gas (EG) treatment system 82, which receive exhaust gas 42 from the extraction points 76, treat the exhaust gas 42, and then supply or distribute the exhaust gas 42 to various target systems. The target systems may include the EOR system 18 and/or other systems, such as a pipeline 86, a storage tank 88, or a carbon sequestration system 90. The EG extraction system 80 may include one or more conduits, valves, controls, and flow separations, which facilitate isolation of the exhaust gas 42 from the oxidant 68, the fuel 70, and other contaminants, while also controlling the temperature, pressure, and flow rate of the extracted exhaust gas 42. The EG treatment system 82 may include one or more heat exchangers (e.g., heat recovery units such as heat recovery steam generators, condensers, coolers, or heaters), catalyst systems (e.g., oxidation catalyst systems), particulate and/or water removal systems (e.g., gas dehydration units, inertial separators, coalescing filters, water impermeable filters, and other filters), chemical injection systems, solvent based treatment systems (e.g., absorbers, flash tanks, etc.), carbon capture systems, gas separation systems, gas purification systems, and/or a solvent based treatment system, exhaust gas compressors, any combination thereof. These subsystems of the EG treatment system 82 enable control of the temperature, pressure, flow rate, moisture content (e.g., amount of water removal), particulate content (e.g., amount of particulate removal), and gas composition (e.g., percentage of CO2, N2, etc.).
The extracted exhaust gas 42 is treated by one or more subsystems of the EG treatment system 82, depending on the target system. For example, the EG treatment system 82 may direct all or part of the exhaust gas 42 through a carbon capture system, a gas separation system, a gas purification system, and/or a solvent based treatment system, which is controlled to separate and purify a carbonaceous gas (e.g., carbon dioxide) 92 and/or nitrogen (N2) 94 for use in the various target systems. For example, embodiments of the EG treatment system 82 may perform gas separation and purification to produce a plurality of different streams 95 of exhaust gas 42, such as a first stream 96, a second stream 97, and a third stream 98. The first stream 96 may have a first composition that is rich in carbon dioxide and/or lean in nitrogen (e.g., a CO2 rich, N2 lean stream). The second stream 97 may have a second composition that has intermediate concentration levels of carbon dioxide and/or nitrogen (e.g., intermediate concentration CO2, N2 stream). The third stream 98 may have a third composition that is lean in carbon dioxide and/or rich in nitrogen (e.g., a CO2 lean, N2 rich stream). Each stream 95 (e.g., 96, 97, and 98) may include a gas dehydration unit, a filter, a gas compressor, or any combination thereof, to facilitate delivery of the stream 95 to a target system. In certain embodiments, the CO2 rich, N2 lean stream 96 may have a CO2 purity or concentration level of greater than approximately 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 96, 97, 98, or 99 percent by volume, and a N2 purity or concentration level of less than approximately 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 percent by volume. In contrast, the CO2 lean, N2 rich stream 98 may have a CO2 purity or concentration level of less than approximately 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 percent by volume, and a N2 purity or concentration level of greater than approximately 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 96, 97, 98, or 99 percent by volume. The intermediate concentration CO2, N2 stream 97 may have a CO2 purity or concentration level and/or a N2 purity or concentration level of between approximately 30 to 70, 35 to 65, 40 to 60, or 45 to 55 percent by volume. Although the foregoing ranges are merely non-limiting examples, the CO2 rich, N2 lean stream 96 and the CO2 lean, N2 rich stream 98 may be particularly well suited for use with the EOR system 18 and the other systems 84. However, any of these rich, lean, or intermediate concentration CO2 streams 95 may be used, alone or in various combinations, with the EOR system 18 and the other systems 84. For example, the EOR system 18 and the other systems 84 (e.g., the pipeline 86, storage tank 88, and the carbon sequestration system 90) each may receive one or more CO2 rich, N2 lean streams 96, one or more CO2 lean, N2 rich streams 98, one or more intermediate concentration CO2, N2 streams 97, and one or more untreated exhaust gas 42 streams (i.e., bypassing the EG treatment system 82).
The EG extraction system 80 extracts the exhaust gas 42 at one or more extraction points 76 along the compressor section, the combustor section, and/or the turbine section, such that the exhaust gas 42 may be used in the EOR system 18 and other systems 84 at suitable temperatures and pressures. The EG extraction system 80 and/or the EG treatment system 82 also may circulate fluid flows (e.g., exhaust gas 42) to and from the EG processing system 54. For example, a portion of the exhaust gas 42 passing through the EG processing system 54 may be extracted by the EG extraction system 80 for use in the EOR system 18 and the other systems 84. In certain embodiments, the EG supply system 78 and the EG processing system 54 may be independent or integral with one another, and thus may use independent or common subsystems. For example, the EG treatment system 82 may be used by both the EG supply system 78 and the EG processing system 54. Exhaust gas 42 extracted from the EG processing system 54 may undergo multiple stages of gas treatment, such as one or more stages of gas treatment in the EG processing system 54 followed by one or more additional stages of gas treatment in the EG treatment system 82.
At each extraction point 76, the extracted exhaust gas 42 may be substantially free of oxidant 68 and fuel 70 (e.g., unburnt fuel or hydrocarbons) due to substantially stoichiometric combustion and/or gas treatment in the EG processing system 54. Furthermore, depending on the target system, the extracted exhaust gas 42 may undergo further treatment in the EG treatment system 82 of the EG supply system 78, thereby further reducing any residual oxidant 68, fuel 70, or other undesirable products of combustion. For example, either before or after treatment in the EG treatment system 82, the extracted exhaust gas 42 may have less than 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 percent by volume of oxidant (e.g., oxygen), unburnt fuel or hydrocarbons (e.g., HCs), nitrogen oxides (e.g., NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (e.g., SOX), hydrogen, and other products of incomplete combustion. By further example, either before or after treatment in the EG treatment system 82, the extracted exhaust gas 42 may have less than approximately 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, or 5000 parts per million by volume (ppmv) of oxidant (e.g., oxygen), unburnt fuel or hydrocarbons (e.g., HCs), nitrogen oxides (e.g., NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (e.g., SOX), hydrogen, and other products of incomplete combustion. Thus, the exhaust gas 42 is particularly well suited for use with the EOR system 18.
The EGR operation of the turbine system 52 specifically enables the exhaust extraction at a multitude of locations 76. For example, the compressor section of the system 52 may be used to compress the exhaust gas 66 without any oxidant 68 (i.e., only compression of the exhaust gas 66), such that a substantially oxygen-free exhaust gas 42 may be extracted from the compressor section and/or the combustor section prior to entry of the oxidant 68 and the fuel 70. The extraction points 76 may be located at interstage ports between adjacent compressor stages, at ports along the compressor discharge casing, at ports along each combustor in the combustor section, or any combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the exhaust gas 66 may not mix with the oxidant 68 and fuel 70 until it reaches the head end portion and/or fuel nozzles of each combustor in the combustor section. Furthermore, one or more flow separators (e.g., walls, dividers, baffles, or the like) may be used to isolate the oxidant 68 and the fuel 70 from the extraction points 76. With these flow separators, the extraction points 76 may be disposed directly along a wall of each combustor in the combustor section.
Once the exhaust gas 66, oxidant 68, and fuel 70 flow through the head end portion (e.g., through fuel nozzles) into the combustion portion (e.g., combustion chamber) of each combustor, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 is controlled to provide a substantially stoichiometric combustion of the exhaust gas 66, oxidant 68, and fuel 70. For example, the system 52 may maintain an equivalence ratio of approximately 0.95 to approximately 1.05. As a result, the products of combustion of the mixture of exhaust gas 66, oxidant 68, and fuel 70 in each combustor is substantially free of oxygen and unburnt fuel. Thus, the products of combustion (or exhaust gas) may be extracted from the turbine section of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 for use as the exhaust gas 42 routed to the EOR system 18. Along the turbine section, the extraction points 76 may be located at any turbine stage, such as interstage ports between adjacent turbine stages. Thus, using any of the foregoing extraction points 76, the turbine-based service system 14 may generate, extract, and deliver the exhaust gas 42 to the hydrocarbon production system 12 (e.g., the EOR system 18) for use in the production of oil/gas 48 from the subterranean reservoir 20.
The SEGR gas turbine system 52 produces the exhaust gas 42, 60, which may be substantially free of oxygen, and routes this exhaust gas 42, 60 to the EG processing system 54 and/or the EG supply system 78. The EG supply system 78 may treat and delivery the exhaust gas 42 (e.g., streams 95) to the hydrocarbon production system 12 and/or the other systems 84. As discussed above, the EG processing system 54 may include the HRSG 56 and the EGR system 58. The HRSG 56 may include one or more heat exchangers, condensers, and various heat recovery equipment, which may be used to recover or transfer heat from the exhaust gas 60 to water 108 to generate the steam 62 for driving the steam turbine 104. Similar to the SEGR gas turbine system 52, the steam turbine 104 may drive one or more loads or machinery 106, thereby generating the mechanical power 72 and the electrical power 74. In the illustrated embodiment, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 and the steam turbine 104 are arranged in tandem to drive the same machinery 106. However, in other embodiments, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 and the steam turbine 104 may separately drive different machinery 106 to independently generate mechanical power 72 and/or electrical power 74. As the steam turbine 104 is driven by the steam 62 from the HRSG 56, the steam 62 gradually decreases in temperature and pressure. Accordingly, the steam turbine 104 recirculates the used steam 62 and/or water 108 back into the HRSG 56 for additional steam generation via heat recovery from the exhaust gas 60. In addition to steam generation, the HRSG 56, the EGR system 58, and/or another portion of the EG processing system 54 may produce the water 64, the exhaust gas 42 for use with the hydrocarbon production system 12, and the exhaust gas 66 for use as an input into the SEGR gas turbine system 52. For example, the water 64 may be a treated water 64, such as a desalinated water for use in other applications. The desalinated water may be particularly useful in regions of low water availability. Regarding the exhaust gas 60, embodiments of the EG processing system 54 may be configured to recirculate the exhaust gas 60 through the EGR system 58 with or without passing the exhaust gas 60 through the HRSG 56.
In the illustrated embodiment, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 has an exhaust recirculation path 110, which extends from an exhaust outlet to an exhaust inlet of the system 52. Along the path 110, the exhaust gas 60 passes through the EG processing system 54, which includes the HRSG 56 and the EGR system 58 in the illustrated embodiment. The EGR system 58 may include one or more conduits, valves, blowers, gas treatment systems (e.g., filters, particulate removal units, gas separation units, gas purification units, heat exchangers, heat recovery units such as heat recovery steam generators, moisture removal units, catalyst units, chemical injection units, or any combination thereof) in series and/or parallel arrangements along the path 110. In other words, the EGR system 58 may include any flow control components, pressure control components, temperature control components, moisture control components, and gas composition control components along the exhaust recirculation path 110 between the exhaust outlet and the exhaust inlet of the system 52. Accordingly, in embodiments with the HRSG 56 along the path 110, the HRSG 56 may be considered a component of the EGR system 58. However, in certain embodiments, the HRSG 56 may be disposed along an exhaust path independent from the exhaust recirculation path 110. Regardless of whether the HRSG 56 is along a separate path or a common path with the EGR system 58, the HRSG 56 and the EGR system 58 intake the exhaust gas 60 and output either the recirculated exhaust gas 66, the exhaust gas 42 for use with the EG supply system 78 (e.g., for the hydrocarbon production system 12 and/or other systems 84), or another output of exhaust gas. Again, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 intakes, mixes, and stoichiometrically combusts the exhaust gas 66, the oxidant 68, and the fuel 70 (e.g., premixed and/or diffusion flames) to produce a substantially oxygen-free and fuel-free exhaust gas 60 for distribution to the EG processing system 54, the hydrocarbon production system 12, or other systems 84.
As noted above with reference to
The quantity, quality, and flow of the exhaust gas 42 and/or the steam 62 may be controlled by the control system 100. The control system 100 may be dedicated entirely to the turbine-based service system 14, or the control system 100 may optionally also provide control (or at least some data to facilitate control) for the hydrocarbon production system 12 and/or other systems 84. In the illustrated embodiment, the control system 100 includes a controller 118 having a processor 120, a memory 122, a steam turbine control 124, a SEGR gas turbine system control 126, and a machinery control 128. The processor 120 may include a single processor or two or more redundant processors, such as triple redundant processors for control of the turbine-based service system 14. The memory 122 may include volatile and/or non-volatile memory. For example, the memory 122 may include one or more hard drives, flash memory, read-only memory, random access memory, or any combination thereof. The controls 124, 126, and 128 may include software and/or hardware controls. For example, the controls 124, 126, and 128 may include various instructions or code stored on the memory 122 and executable by the processor 120. The control 124 is configured to control operation of the steam turbine 104, the SEGR gas turbine system control 126 is configured to control the system 52, and the machinery control 128 is configured to control the machinery 106. Thus, the controller 118 (e.g., controls 124, 126, and 128) may be configured to coordinate various sub-systems of the turbine-based service system 14 to provide a suitable stream of the exhaust gas 42 to the hydrocarbon production system 12.
In certain embodiments of the control system 100, each element (e.g., system, subsystem, and component) illustrated in the drawings or described herein includes (e.g., directly within, upstream, or downstream of such element) one or more industrial control features, such as sensors and control devices, which are communicatively coupled with one another over an industrial control network along with the controller 118. For example, the control devices associated with each element may include a dedicated device controller (e.g., including a processor, memory, and control instructions), one or more actuators, valves, switches, and industrial control equipment, which enable control based on sensor feedback 130, control signals from the controller 118, control signals from a user, or any combination thereof. Thus, any of the control functionality described herein may be implemented with control instructions stored and/or executable by the controller 118, dedicated device controllers associated with each element, or a combination thereof.
In order to facilitate such control functionality, the control system 100 includes one or more sensors distributed throughout the system 10 to obtain the sensor feedback 130 for use in execution of the various controls, e.g., the controls 124, 126, and 128. For example, the sensor feedback 130 may be obtained from sensors distributed throughout the SEGR gas turbine system 52, the machinery 106, the EG processing system 54, the steam turbine 104, the hydrocarbon production system 12, or any other components throughout the turbine-based service system 14 or the hydrocarbon production system 12. For example, the sensor feedback 130 may include temperature feedback, pressure feedback, flow rate feedback, flame temperature feedback, combustion dynamics feedback, intake oxidant composition feedback, intake fuel composition feedback, exhaust composition feedback, the output level of mechanical power 72, the output level of electrical power 74, the output quantity of the exhaust gas 42, 60, the output quantity or quality of the water 64, or any combination thereof. For example, the sensor feedback 130 may include a composition of the exhaust gas 42, 60 to facilitate stoichiometric combustion in the SEGR gas turbine system 52. For example, the sensor feedback 130 may include feedback from one or more intake oxidant sensors along an oxidant supply path of the oxidant 68, one or more intake fuel sensors along a fuel supply path of the fuel 70, and one or more exhaust emissions sensors disposed along the exhaust recirculation path 110 and/or within the SEGR gas turbine system 52. The intake oxidant sensors, intake fuel sensors, and exhaust emissions sensors may include temperature sensors, pressure sensors, flow rate sensors, and composition sensors. The emissions sensors may includes sensors for nitrogen oxides (e.g., NOX sensors), carbon oxides (e.g., CO sensors and CO2 sensors), sulfur oxides (e.g., SOX sensors), hydrogen (e.g., H2 sensors), oxygen (e.g., O2 sensors), unburnt hydrocarbons (e.g., HC sensors), or other products of incomplete combustion, or any combination thereof.
Using this feedback 130, the control system 100 may adjust (e.g., increase, decrease, or maintain) the intake flow of exhaust gas 66, oxidant 68, and/or fuel 70 into the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (among other operational parameters) to maintain the equivalence ratio within a suitable range, e.g., between approximately 0.95 to approximately 1.05, between approximately 0.95 to approximately 1.0, between approximately 1.0 to approximately 1.05, or substantially at 1.0. For example, the control system 100 may analyze the feedback 130 to monitor the exhaust emissions (e.g., concentration levels of nitrogen oxides, carbon oxides such as CO and CO2, sulfur oxides, hydrogen, oxygen, unburnt hydrocarbons, and other products of incomplete combustion) and/or determine the equivalence ratio, and then control one or more components to adjust the exhaust emissions (e.g., concentration levels in the exhaust gas 42) and/or the equivalence ratio. The controlled components may include any of the components illustrated and described with reference to the drawings, including but not limited to, valves along the supply paths for the oxidant 68, the fuel 70, and the exhaust gas 66; an oxidant compressor, a fuel pump, or any components in the EG processing system 54; any components of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, or any combination thereof. The controlled components may adjust (e.g., increase, decrease, or maintain) the flow rates, temperatures, pressures, or percentages (e.g., equivalence ratio) of the oxidant 68, the fuel 70, and the exhaust gas 66 that combust within the SEGR gas turbine system 52. The controlled components also may include one or more gas treatment systems, such as catalyst units (e.g., oxidation catalyst units), supplies for the catalyst units (e.g., oxidation fuel, heat, electricity, etc.), gas purification and/or separation units (e.g., solvent based separators, absorbers, flash tanks, etc.), and filtration units. The gas treatment systems may help reduce various exhaust emissions along the exhaust recirculation path 110, a vent path (e.g., exhausted into the atmosphere), or an extraction path to the EG supply system 78.
In certain embodiments, the control system 100 may analyze the feedback 130 and control one or more components to maintain or reduce emissions levels (e.g., concentration levels in the exhaust gas 42, 60, 95) to a target range, such as less than approximately 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, or 10000 parts per million by volume (ppmv). These target ranges may be the same or different for each of the exhaust emissions, e.g., concentration levels of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, sulfur oxides, hydrogen, oxygen, unburnt hydrocarbons, and other products of incomplete combustion. For example, depending on the equivalence ratio, the control system 100 may selectively control exhaust emissions (e.g., concentration levels) of oxidant (e.g., oxygen) within a target range of less than approximately 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 250, 500, 750, or 1000 ppmv; carbon monoxide (CO) within a target range of less than approximately 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2500, or 5000 ppmv; and nitrogen oxides (NOX) within a target range of less than approximately 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, or 500 ppmv. In certain embodiments operating with a substantially stoichiometric equivalence ratio, the control system 100 may selectively control exhaust emissions (e.g., concentration levels) of oxidant (e.g., oxygen) within a target range of less than approximately 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or 100 ppmv; and carbon monoxide (CO) within a target range of less than approximately 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, or 5000 ppmv. In certain embodiments operating with a fuel-lean equivalence ratio (e.g., between approximately 0.95 to 1.0), the control system 100 may selectively control exhaust emissions (e.g., concentration levels) of oxidant (e.g., oxygen) within a target range of less than approximately 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, or 1500 ppmv; carbon monoxide (CO) within a target range of less than approximately 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 150, or 200 ppmv; and nitrogen oxides (e.g., NOX) within a target range of less than approximately 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, or 400 ppmv. The foregoing target ranges are merely examples, and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosed embodiments.
The control system 100 also may be coupled to a local interface 132 and a remote interface 134. For example, the local interface 132 may include a computer workstation disposed on-site at the turbine-based service system 14 and/or the hydrocarbon production system 12. In contrast, the remote interface 134 may include a computer workstation disposed off-site from the turbine-based service system 14 and the hydrocarbon production system 12, such as through an internet connection. These interfaces 132 and 134 facilitate monitoring and control of the turbine-based service system 14, such as through one or more graphical displays of sensor feedback 130, operational parameters, and so forth.
Again, as noted above, the controller 118 includes a variety of controls 124, 126, and 128 to facilitate control of the turbine-based service system 14. The steam turbine control 124 may receive the sensor feedback 130 and output control commands to facilitate operation of the steam turbine 104. For example, the steam turbine control 124 may receive the sensor feedback 130 from the HRSG 56, the machinery 106, temperature and pressure sensors along a path of the steam 62, temperature and pressure sensors along a path of the water 108, and various sensors indicative of the mechanical power 72 and the electrical power 74. Likewise, the SEGR gas turbine system control 126 may receive sensor feedback 130 from one or more sensors disposed along the SEGR gas turbine system 52, the machinery 106, the EG processing system 54, or any combination thereof. For example, the sensor feedback 130 may be obtained from temperature sensors, pressure sensors, clearance sensors, vibration sensors, flame sensors, fuel composition sensors, exhaust gas composition sensors, or any combination thereof, disposed within or external to the SEGR gas turbine system 52. Finally, the machinery control 128 may receive sensor feedback 130 from various sensors associated with the mechanical power 72 and the electrical power 74, as well as sensors disposed within the machinery 106. Each of these controls 124, 126, and 128 uses the sensor feedback 130 to improve operation of the turbine-based service system 14.
In the illustrated embodiment, the SEGR gas turbine system control 126 may execute instructions to control the quantity and quality of the exhaust gas 42, 60, 95 in the EG processing system 54, the EG supply system 78, the hydrocarbon production system 12, and/or the other systems 84. For example, the SEGR gas turbine system control 126 may maintain a level of oxidant (e.g., oxygen) and/or unburnt fuel in the exhaust gas 60 below a threshold suitable for use with the exhaust gas injection EOR system 112. In certain embodiments, the threshold levels may be less than 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 percent of oxidant (e.g., oxygen) and/or unburnt fuel by volume of the exhaust gas 42, 60; or the threshold levels of oxidant (e.g., oxygen) and/or unburnt fuel (and other exhaust emissions) may be less than approximately 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, or 5000 parts per million by volume (ppmv) in the exhaust gas 42, 60. By further example, in order to achieve these low levels of oxidant (e.g., oxygen) and/or unburnt fuel, the SEGR gas turbine system control 126 may maintain an equivalence ratio for combustion in the SEGR gas turbine system 52 between approximately 0.95 and approximately 1.05. The SEGR gas turbine system control 126 also may control the EG extraction system 80 and the EG treatment system 82 to maintain the temperature, pressure, flow rate, and gas composition of the exhaust gas 42, 60, 95 within suitable ranges for the exhaust gas injection EOR system 112, the pipeline 86, the storage tank 88, and the carbon sequestration system 90. As discussed above, the EG treatment system 82 may be controlled to purify and/or separate the exhaust gas 42 into one or more gas streams 95, such as the CO2 rich, N2 lean stream 96, the intermediate concentration CO2, N2 stream 97, and the CO2 lean, N2 rich stream 98. In addition to controls for the exhaust gas 42, 60, and 95, the controls 124, 126, and 128 may execute one or more instructions to maintain the mechanical power 72 within a suitable power range, or maintain the electrical power 74 within a suitable frequency and power range.
The fuel nozzles 164 may include any combination of premix fuel nozzles 164 (e.g., configured to premix the oxidant 68 and fuel 70 for generation of an oxidant/fuel premix flame) and/or diffusion fuel nozzles 164 (e.g., configured to inject separate flows of the oxidant 68 and fuel 70 for generation of an oxidant/fuel diffusion flame). Embodiments of the premix fuel nozzles 164 may include swirl vanes, mixing chambers, or other features to internally mix the oxidant 68 and fuel 70 within the nozzles 164, prior to injection and combustion in the combustion chamber 168. The premix fuel nozzles 164 also may receive at least some partially mixed oxidant 68 and fuel 70. In certain embodiments, each diffusion fuel nozzle 164 may isolate flows of the oxidant 68 and the fuel 70 until the point of injection, while also isolating flows of one or more diluents (e.g., the exhaust gas 66, steam, nitrogen, or another inert gas) until the point of injection. In other embodiments, each diffusion fuel nozzle 164 may isolate flows of the oxidant 68 and the fuel 70 until the point of injection, while partially mixing one or more diluents (e.g., the exhaust gas 66, steam, nitrogen, or another inert gas) with the oxidant 68 and/or the fuel 70 prior to the point of injection. In addition, one or more diluents (e.g., the exhaust gas 66, steam, nitrogen, or another inert gas) may be injected into the combustor (e.g., into the hot products of combustion) either at or downstream from the combustion zone, thereby helping to reduce the temperature of the hot products of combustion and reduce emissions of NOX (e.g., NO and NO2). Regardless of the type of fuel nozzle 164, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 may be controlled to provide substantially stoichiometric combustion of the oxidant 68 and fuel 70.
In diffusion combustion embodiments using the diffusion fuel nozzles 164, the fuel 70 and oxidant 68 generally do not mix upstream from the diffusion flame, but rather the fuel 70 and oxidant 68 mix and react directly at the flame surface and/or the flame surface exists at the location of mixing between the fuel 70 and oxidant 68. In particular, the fuel 70 and oxidant 68 separately approach the flame surface (or diffusion boundary/interface), and then diffuse (e.g., via molecular and viscous diffusion) along the flame surface (or diffusion boundary/interface) to generate the diffusion flame. It is noteworthy that the fuel 70 and oxidant 68 may be at a substantially stoichiometric ratio along this flame surface (or diffusion boundary/interface), which may result in a greater flame temperature (e.g., a peak flame temperature) along this flame surface. The stoichiometric fuel/oxidant ratio generally results in a greater flame temperature (e.g., a peak flame temperature), as compared with a fuel-lean or fuel-rich fuel/oxidant ratio. As a result, the diffusion flame may be substantially more stable than a premix flame, because the diffusion of fuel 70 and oxidant 68 helps to maintain a stoichiometric ratio (and greater temperature) along the flame surface. Although greater flame temperatures can also lead to greater exhaust emissions, such as NOX emissions, the disclosed embodiments use one or more diluents to help control the temperature and emissions while still avoiding any premixing of the fuel 70 and oxidant 68. For example, the disclosed embodiments may introduce one or more diluents separate from the fuel 70 and oxidant 68 (e.g., after the point of combustion and/or downstream from the diffusion flame), thereby helping to reduce the temperature and reduce the emissions (e.g., NOX emissions) produced by the diffusion flame.
In operation, as illustrated, the compressor section 152 receives and compresses the exhaust gas 66 from the EG processing system 54, and outputs a compressed exhaust gas 170 to each of the combustors 160 in the combustor section 154. Upon combustion of the fuel 60, oxidant 68, and exhaust gas 170 within each combustor 160, additional exhaust gas or products of combustion 172 (i.e., combustion gas) is routed into the turbine section 156. Similar to the compressor section 152, the turbine section 156 includes one or more turbines or turbine stages 174, which may include a series of rotary turbine blades. These turbine blades are then driven by the products of combustion 172 generated in the combustor section 154, thereby driving rotation of a shaft 176 coupled to the machinery 106. Again, the machinery 106 may include a variety of equipment coupled to either end of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, such as machinery 106, 178 coupled to the turbine section 156 and/or machinery 106, 180 coupled to the compressor section 152. In certain embodiments, the machinery 106, 178, 180 may include one or more electrical generators, oxidant compressors for the oxidant 68, fuel pumps for the fuel 70, gear boxes, or additional drives (e.g. steam turbine 104, electrical motor, etc.) coupled to the SEGR gas turbine system 52. Non-limiting examples are discussed in further detail below with reference to TABLE 1. As illustrated, the turbine section 156 outputs the exhaust gas 60 to recirculate along the exhaust recirculation path 110 from an exhaust outlet 182 of the turbine section 156 to an exhaust inlet 184 into the compressor section 152. Along the exhaust recirculation path 110, the exhaust gas 60 passes through the EG processing system 54 (e.g., the HRSG 56 and/or the EGR system 58) as discussed in detail above.
Again, each combustor 160 in the combustor section 154 receives, mixes, and stoichiometrically combusts the compressed exhaust gas 170, the oxidant 68, and the fuel 70 to produce the additional exhaust gas or products of combustion 172 to drive the turbine section 156. In certain embodiments, the oxidant 68 is compressed by an oxidant compression system 186, such as a main oxidant compression (MOC) system (e.g., a main air compression (MAC) system) having one or more oxidant compressors (MOCs). The oxidant compression system 186 includes an oxidant compressor 188 coupled to a drive 190. For example, the drive 190 may include an electric motor, a combustion engine, or any combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the drive 190 may be a turbine engine, such as the gas turbine engine 150. Accordingly, the oxidant compression system 186 may be an integral part of the machinery 106. In other words, the compressor 188 may be directly or indirectly driven by the mechanical power 72 supplied by the shaft 176 of the gas turbine engine 150. In such an embodiment, the drive 190 may be excluded, because the compressor 188 relies on the power output from the turbine engine 150. However, in certain embodiments employing more than one oxidant compressor is employed, a first oxidant compressor (e.g., a low pressure (LP) oxidant compressor) may be driven by the drive 190 while the shaft 176 drives a second oxidant compressor (e.g., a high pressure (HP) oxidant compressor), or vice versa. For example, in another embodiment, the HP MOC is driven by the drive 190 and the LP oxidant compressor is driven by the shaft 176. In the illustrated embodiment, the oxidant compression system 186 is separate from the machinery 106. In each of these embodiments, the compression system 186 compresses and supplies the oxidant 68 to the fuel nozzles 164 and the combustors 160. Accordingly, some or all of the machinery 106, 178, 180 may be configured to increase the operational efficiency of the compression system 186 (e.g., the compressor 188 and/or additional compressors).
The variety of components of the machinery 106, indicated by element numbers 106A, 106B, 106C, 106D, 106E, and 106F, may be disposed along the line of the shaft 176 and/or parallel to the line of the shaft 176 in one or more series arrangements, parallel arrangements, or any combination of series and parallel arrangements. For example, the machinery 106, 178, 180 (e.g., 106A through 106F) may include any series and/or parallel arrangement, in any order, of: one or more gearboxes (e.g., parallel shaft, epicyclic gearboxes), one or more compressors (e.g., oxidant compressors, booster compressors such as EG booster compressors), one or more power generation units (e.g., electrical generators), one or more drives (e.g., steam turbine engines, electrical motors), heat exchange units (e.g., direct or indirect heat exchangers), clutches, or any combination thereof. The compressors may include axial compressors, radial or centrifugal compressors, or any combination thereof, each having one or more compression stages. Regarding the heat exchangers, direct heat exchangers may include spray coolers (e.g., spray intercoolers), which inject a liquid spray into a gas flow (e.g., oxidant flow) for direct cooling of the gas flow. Indirect heat exchangers may include at least one wall (e.g., a shell and tube heat exchanger) separating first and second flows, such as a fluid flow (e.g., oxidant flow) separated from a coolant flow (e.g., water, air, refrigerant, or any other liquid or gas coolant), wherein the coolant flow transfers heat from the fluid flow without any direct contact. Examples of indirect heat exchangers include intercooler heat exchangers and heat recovery units, such as heat recovery steam generators. The heat exchangers also may include heaters. As discussed in further detail below, each of these machinery components may be used in various combinations as indicated by the non-limiting examples set forth in TABLE 1.
Generally, the machinery 106, 178, 180 may be configured to increase the efficiency of the compression system 186 by, for example, adjusting operational speeds of one or more oxidant compressors in the system 186, facilitating compression of the oxidant 68 through cooling, and/or extraction of surplus power. The disclosed embodiments are intended to include any and all permutations of the foregoing components in the machinery 106, 178, 180 in series and parallel arrangements, wherein one, more than one, all, or none of the components derive power from the shaft 176. As illustrated below, TABLE 1 depicts some non-limiting examples of arrangements of the machinery 106, 178, 180 disposed proximate and/or coupled to the compressor and turbine sections 152, 156.
As illustrated above in TABLE 1, a cooling unit is represented as CLR, a clutch is represented as CLU, a drive is represented by DRV, a gearbox is represented as GBX, a generator is represented by GEN, a heating unit is represented by HTR, a main oxidant compressor unit is represented by MOC, with low pressure and high pressure variants being represented as LP MOC and HP MOC, respectively, and a steam generator unit is represented as STGN. Although TABLE 1 illustrates the machinery 106, 178, 180 in sequence toward the compressor section 152 or the turbine section 156, TABLE 1 is also intended to cover the reverse sequence of the machinery 106, 178, 180. In TABLE 1, any cell including two or more components is intended to cover a parallel arrangement of the components. TABLE 1 is not intended to exclude any non-illustrated permutations of the machinery 106, 178, 180. These components of the machinery 106, 178, 180 may enable feedback control of temperature, pressure, and flow rate of the oxidant 68 sent to the gas turbine engine 150. As discussed in further detail below, the oxidant 68 and the fuel 70 may be supplied to the gas turbine engine 150 at locations specifically selected to facilitate isolation and extraction of the compressed exhaust gas 170 without any oxidant 68 or fuel 70 degrading the quality of the exhaust gas 170.
The EG supply system 78, as illustrated in
The extracted exhaust gas 42, which is distributed by the EG supply system 78, has a controlled composition suitable for the target systems (e.g., the hydrocarbon production system 12 and the other systems 84). For example, at each of these extraction points 76, the exhaust gas 170 may be substantially isolated from injection points (or flows) of the oxidant 68 and the fuel 70. In other words, the EG supply system 78 may be specifically designed to extract the exhaust gas 170 from the gas turbine engine 150 without any added oxidant 68 or fuel 70. Furthermore, in view of the stoichiometric combustion in each of the combustors 160, the extracted exhaust gas 42 may be substantially free of oxygen and fuel. The EG supply system 78 may route the extracted exhaust gas 42 directly or indirectly to the hydrocarbon production system 12 and/or other systems 84 for use in various processes, such as enhanced oil recovery, carbon sequestration, storage, or transport to an offsite location. However, in certain embodiments, the EG supply system 78 includes the EG treatment system (EGTS) 82 for further treatment of the exhaust gas 42, prior to use with the target systems. For example, the EG treatment system 82 may purify and/or separate the exhaust gas 42 into one or more streams 95, such as the CO2 rich, N2 lean stream 96, the intermediate concentration CO2, N2 stream 97, and the CO2 lean, N2 rich stream 98. These treated exhaust gas streams 95 may be used individually, or in any combination, with the hydrocarbon production system 12 and the other systems 84 (e.g., the pipeline 86, the storage tank 88, and the carbon sequestration system 90).
Similar to the exhaust gas treatments performed in the EG supply system 78, the EG processing system 54 may include a plurality of exhaust gas (EG) treatment components 192, such as indicated by element numbers 194, 196, 198, 200, 202, 204, 206, 208, and 210. These EG treatment components 192 (e.g., 194 through 210) may be disposed along the exhaust recirculation path 110 in one or more series arrangements, parallel arrangements, or any combination of series and parallel arrangements. For example, the EG treatment components 192 (e.g., 194 through 210) may include any series and/or parallel arrangement, in any order, of: one or more heat exchangers (e.g., heat recovery units such as heat recovery steam generators, condensers, coolers, or heaters), catalyst systems (e.g., oxidation catalyst systems), particulate and/or water removal systems (e.g., inertial separators, coalescing filters, water impermeable filters, and other filters), chemical injection systems, solvent based treatment systems (e.g., absorbers, flash tanks, etc.), carbon capture systems, gas separation systems, gas purification systems, and/or a solvent based treatment system, or any combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the catalyst systems may include an oxidation catalyst, a carbon monoxide reduction catalyst, a nitrogen oxides reduction catalyst, an aluminum oxide, a zirconium oxide, a silicone oxide, a titanium oxide, a platinum oxide, a palladium oxide, a cobalt oxide, or a mixed metal oxide, or a combination thereof. The disclosed embodiments are intended to include any and all permutations of the foregoing components 192 in series and parallel arrangements. As illustrated below, TABLE 2 depicts some non-limiting examples of arrangements of the components 192 along the exhaust recirculation path 110.
As illustrated above in TABLE 2, a catalyst unit is represented by CU, an oxidation catalyst unit is represented by OCU, a booster blower is represented by BB, a heat exchanger is represented by HX, a heat recovery unit is represented by HRU, a heat recovery steam generator is represented by HRSG, a condenser is represented by COND, a steam turbine is represented by ST, a particulate removal unit is represented by PRU, a moisture removal unit is represented by MRU, a filter is represented by FIL, a coalescing filter is represented by CFIL, a water impermeable filter is represented by WFIL, an inertial separator is represented by INER, and a diluent supply system (e.g., steam, nitrogen, or other inert gas) is represented by DIL. Although TABLE 2 illustrates the components 192 in sequence from the exhaust outlet 182 of the turbine section 156 toward the exhaust inlet 184 of the compressor section 152, TABLE 2 is also intended to cover the reverse sequence of the illustrated components 192. In TABLE 2, any cell including two or more components is intended to cover an integrated unit with the components, a parallel arrangement of the components, or any combination thereof. Furthermore, in context of TABLE 2, the HRU, the HRSG, and the COND are examples of the HE; the HRSG is an example of the HRU; the COND, WFIL, and CFIL are examples of the WRU; the INER, FIL, WFIL, and CFIL are examples of the PRU; and the WFIL and CFIL are examples of the FIL. Again, TABLE 2 is not intended to exclude any non-illustrated permutations of the components 192. In certain embodiments, the illustrated components 192 (e.g., 194 through 210) may be partially or completed integrated within the HRSG 56, the EGR system 58, or any combination thereof. These EG treatment components 192 may enable feedback control of temperature, pressure, flow rate, and gas composition, while also removing moisture and particulates from the exhaust gas 60. Furthermore, the treated exhaust gas 60 may be extracted at one or more extraction points 76 for use in the EG supply system 78 and/or recirculated to the exhaust inlet 184 of the compressor section 152.
As the treated, recirculated exhaust gas 66 passes through the compressor section 152, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 may bleed off a portion of the compressed exhaust gas along one or more lines 212 (e.g., bleed conduits or bypass conduits). Each line 212 may route the exhaust gas into one or more heat exchangers 214 (e.g., cooling units), thereby cooling the exhaust gas for recirculation back into the SEGR gas turbine system 52. For example, after passing through the heat exchanger 214, a portion of the cooled exhaust gas may be routed to the turbine section 156 along line 212 for cooling and/or sealing of the turbine casing, turbine shrouds, bearings, and other components. In such an embodiment, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 does not route any oxidant 68 (or other potential contaminants) through the turbine section 156 for cooling and/or sealing purposes, and thus any leakage of the cooled exhaust gas will not contaminate the hot products of combustion (e.g., working exhaust gas) flowing through and driving the turbine stages of the turbine section 156. By further example, after passing through the heat exchanger 214, a portion of the cooled exhaust gas may be routed along line 216 (e.g., return conduit) to an upstream compressor stage of the compressor section 152, thereby improving the efficiency of compression by the compressor section 152. In such an embodiment, the heat exchanger 214 may be configured as an interstage cooling unit for the compressor section 152. In this manner, the cooled exhaust gas helps to increase the operational efficiency of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, while simultaneously helping to maintain the purity of the exhaust gas (e.g., substantially free of oxidant and fuel).
The process 220 may begin by initiating a startup mode of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 of
The process 220 may then combust a mixture of the compressed oxidant, fuel, and exhaust gas in the combustors 160 to produce hot combustion gas 172, as indicated by block 230. In particular, the process 220 may be controlled by the control system 100 of
The process 220 then drives the turbine section 156 with the hot combustion gas 172, as indicated by block 232. For example, the hot combustion gas 172 may drive one or more turbine stages 174 disposed within the turbine section 156. Downstream of the turbine section 156, the process 220 may treat the exhaust gas 60 from the final turbine stage 174, as indicated by block 234. For example, the exhaust gas treatment 234 may include filtration, catalytic reaction of any residual oxidant 68 and/or fuel 70, chemical treatment, heat recovery with the HRSG 56, and so forth. The process 220 may also recirculate at least some of the exhaust gas 60 back to the compressor section 152 of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, as indicated by block 236. For example, the exhaust gas recirculation 236 may involve passage through the exhaust recirculation path 110 having the EG processing system 54 as illustrated in
In turn, the recirculated exhaust gas 66 may be compressed in the compressor section 152, as indicated by block 238. For example, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 may sequentially compress the recirculated exhaust gas 66 in one or more compressor stages 158 of the compressor section 152. Subsequently, the compressed exhaust gas 170 may be supplied to the combustors 160 and fuel nozzles 164, as indicated by block 228. Steps 230, 232, 234, 236, and 238 may then repeat, until the process 220 eventually transitions to a steady state mode, as indicated by block 240. Upon the transition 240, the process 220 may continue to perform the steps 224 through 238, but may also begin to extract the exhaust gas 42 via the EG supply system 78, as indicated by block 242. For example, the exhaust gas 42 may be extracted from one or more extraction points 76 along the compressor section 152, the combustor section 154, and the turbine section 156 as indicated in
As set forth above, present embodiments enable the control of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (e.g., a ULET power plant) to support an electrical grid during transient grid events. In other words, present embodiments enable a ULET power plant to quickly increase its load to support an electrical grid experiencing a voltage or frequency event. By specific example, a ULET power plant in accordance with the present approach may provide a Primary Response or Primary Frequency Response (PFR) to respond to transient frequency events in the electrical grid. For example, in the event of a reduction in the frequency of the grid system, the PFR may generally involve a power plant rapidly picking up a corresponding portion of its baseload output in order to counteract the reduction in grid frequency.
For non-stoichiometric gas turbine systems operating in a fuel-lean mode, excess oxidant may be present in the combustors throughout operation. As such, the fuel flow rate to the combustors of the gas turbine system may be quickly adjusted to increase the mechanical and electrical power output of the system upon detection of a transient event (e.g., an under-voltage or under-frequency event). In contrast, for the disclosed SEGR gas turbine system 52, the oxidant and fuel may be balanced in a substantially stoichiometric ratio during a substantial portion of its operation. Accordingly, for the SEGR gas turbine system 52, both the amount of oxidant and fuel may be increased in order to increase the electrical and mechanical power output to support the grid during the transient event. For certain embodiments of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, in general, air flow adjustments may be generally affected at a slower rate than fuel flow adjustments. For such embodiments, this effect may be due to the slower response capability of certain air flow effectors (e.g., inlet guide vanes and/or stator vanes) when compared to the response capability of certain fuel flow effectors (e.g., control valves). It may be appreciated that increasing the fuel flow rate in a SEGR gas turbine system 52 without increasing the oxidant may drive the equivalence ratio (Φ) to a fuel-rich mode that may suppress the flame temperature, which may actually reduce the mechanical power produced by the turbine section 156. Accordingly, for certain embodiments discussed below, the fuel flow rate changes may typically follow or track oxidant flow rate changes made to address the transient event.
With the foregoing in mind, set forth below are five different example embodiments (Examples 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) describing methods for controlling operation of a SEGR gas turbine system 52 (e.g., a ULET power plant) in order to allow the system to respond to transient events in the electrical grid (e.g., provide PFR for the electrical grid). It may be appreciated that one or more of the embodiments described below may be used alone or in various combinations with one another to address a transient event. Generally speaking, certain embodiments discussed below are directed towards quickly increasing an oxidant concentration, as well as the fuel concentration, in the combustors of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 in order to increase mechanical and electrical power output to address the transient event. Other embodiments discussed below are directed towards temporarily decreasing electrical power consumption within the ULET power plant to effectively increase net electrical power output in order to address the transient event. Still other embodiments discussed below enable the SEGR gas turbine system 52 to address transient events when operating in a non-stoichiometric mode (e.g., a non-emissions compliant mode) during loading.
The turbine section 156 illustrated in
Additionally, the illustrated SEGR gas turbine system 52 includes a controller system 100 that is communicatively coupled to and controls various components of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. In general, the control system 100 may receive operational data from and/or provide control signals to these components according to the control strategies described below. The control system 100 includes a closed-loop controller 118A capable of implementing a closed-loop control strategy in which control signals are generated based on the operational parameters of one or more components of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 to provide feedback-based control of the various components of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. The control system 100 also includes an open-loop controller 118B, implemented in parallel with the closed-loop controller 118A, and capable of implementing an open-loop control strategy in which control signals are generated not based on the operational parameters of the one or more components, but rather are based on other factors (e.g., the determination of a transient event occurrence or the passage of a certain amount of time). In certain embodiments, the open-loop and closed-loop control strategies may be implemented in a single controller that may coordinate operations (e.g., properly assume and relinquish control of portions of the SEGR gas turbine system 52) according to the methods set forth below. Additionally, the controller system 100 may be communicatively coupled to one or more sensors 310 that perform measurements of the electrical grid 306 and facilitate the detection of transient events (e.g., under voltage or under frequency events) in the electrical grid 306. In other embodiments, the controller system 100 may determine the occurrence of a transient event based on instructions from a controller or control system of the electrical grid 306.
In certain example embodiments presented below, the control system 100 may temporarily relax (e.g., increase) one or more programmed operational limits of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 while responding to the transient event in the electrical grid 306. For example, in certain embodiments, in addition or alternative to examples set forth below, the controller 100 may temporarily increase a programmed torque limit constraint of a component (e.g., the turbine section 156 or a shaft 311 coupled thereto) of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 to allow the turbine section 156 to temporarily increase mechanical power output, allowing the generator 106 to temporarily increase electrical power output, to support the electrical grid 306 during a transient event. In other embodiments, the relaxed constraint may include a torque limit, a speed limit, a pressure limit, a flow rate limit, a voltage limit, a current limit, a power limit, or another suitable constraint of the SEGR gas turbine system 52.
In certain embodiments, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 illustrated in
For this example, the closed-loop control strategy of the controller 118A may dictate that the flow rate of exhaust gas 42 through the control valve 308 is to be a fixed percentage (e.g., 99%, 95%, 90%, 85%, 70%, 75%, or another suitable fixed percentage) of the total flow rate of both exhaust gas 42 and oxidant 68 delivered to the inlet 309 of the MOC 186. Meanwhile, the parallel open-loop control strategy of the controller 118B may dictate a fully open position for the control valve 308 during normal operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, but may dictate a fully closed position (e.g., immediately or after a programmable time delay) for the control valve 308 upon determining that a transient event is occurring in the electrical grid 306. When the control valve 308 is in the fully closed position, little to no exhaust gas 42 is delivered to the inlet 309 of the MOC 186. This results in the MOC 186 receiving more oxidant 68 (e.g., more fresh air flow or more oxygen flow), which increases abundance of the oxidant 68 in the combustor 160. Whenever the control system 100 detects this increase in oxidant, the closed-loop controller 118A may increase the flow of fuel 70 through the control valve 303 in a commensurate manner to maintain the equivalence ratio near approximately 1 (e.g., Φ between approximately 0.95 and 1.05) throughout the response to the transient event. Accordingly, the increased amount of both oxidant 68 and fuel 70 being delivered to and consumed by the combustor 160 results in an increase in mechanical power output for the SEGR gas turbine system 52, as well as an increase in electrical power output of the generator 106 to the electrical grid 306 to accommodate the transient event, while still maintaining an equivalence ratio near approximately 1 (e.g., Φ between approximately 0.95 and 1.05).
Accordingly, throughout operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, the controller 118A may determine a desired position for the control valve 308 that provides a desired flow rate of exhaust gas 42 to the inlet 309 of the MOC 186, as dictated by the closed-loop control strategy. In particular, the controller 118A may determine that the closed-loop control strategy dictates a particular position for the control valve 308 that provides a flow rate of exhaust gas 42 through the control valve 308 that is a fixed percentage (e.g., 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 98%, or another suitable value) of the total flow rate of both oxidant 68 and exhaust gas 42 delivered to the inlet of the MOC 186. Additionally, during normal operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (i.e., no transient grid events occurring), the controller 118B may determine that the control valve 308 should be fully or mostly opened to provide the maximum flow rate of exhaust gas 42 to the inlet 309 of the MOC 186, as dictated by the open-loop control strategy. As such, during normal operations of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, since the closed-loop control strategy used by the controller 118A will generally dictate the more closed position for (i.e., the lower flow rate though) control valve 308, the controller 118A prevails, invoking the control system 100 to send the appropriate control signals to the control valve 308 based on the position dictated by the controller 118A.
However, when a transient event is determined to be occurring in the electrical grid (e.g., by the sensors 310), the controller 118B may determine that the control valve 308 should be fully or mostly closed to provide little or no exhaust gas 42 to the inlet 309 of the MOC 186, as dictated by the open-loop control strategy. Here, since the open-loop control strategy used by the controller 118B generally dictates a more closed position for (i.e., the lower flow rate though) control valve 308 than the closed-loop control strategy used by controller 118A, the controller 118B prevails, invoking the control system 100 to send the appropriate control signals to the control valve 308 based on the position dictated by the controller 118B. In certain embodiments, the control system 100 may send the control signals to the control valve 308 immediately or after a programmable or predetermined time delay. Then, control valve 308 may remain in the fully closed position for a programmable or predetermined time delay (e.g., based on the typical length of time of a transient event on the electrical grid 306), after which the open-loop control strategy may dictate that the control valve 308 should gradual return to a fully open position over a period of time (e.g., at a programmable or predetermined ramp rate). Accordingly, at some point during this ramp, the closed-loop control strategy should dictate a more closed position for (i.e., the lower flow rate though) control valve 308 than the open-loop strategy of controller 118B, resulting in the control system 100 once again providing control signals to the control valve 308 based on the position desired by the controller 118A.
In certain embodiments, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 illustrated in
For this example, the closed-loop control strategy of the controller 118A may dictate an MOC IGV angle or position that is based on the current operational parameters of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. For example, this closed-loop control strategy may generally seek to limit the amount of oxidant being delivered to the combustor 160 to maintain substantially stoichiometric combustion in the system 52. During normal operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, the open-loop control strategy of the controller 118B may dictate an MOC IGV position that is substantially the same as the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A. However, upon detection of a transient event in the electrical grid 306, the controller 118B may dictate a MOC IGV position (e.g., immediately or after a programmable time delay) that is a programmable fixed percentage greater (more open) (e.g., 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, or 10% greater) than the IGV position dictated by the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A. As a result, the total flow of oxidant 68 entering the inlet 309 of the MOC 186 will increase, resulting in an increase in the abundance of the oxidant 68 in the combustor 160. Whenever the control system 100 detects this increase in oxidant, the closed-loop controller 118A may cause the control system 100 to increase the flow of fuel 70 through the control valve 303 in a commensurate manner to maintain the equivalence ratio near approximately 1 (e.g., Φ between approximately 0.95 and 1.05) throughout the response to the transient event. Accordingly, the increased amount of both oxidant 68 and fuel 70 being delivered to (and consumed by) the combustor 160 results in an increase in mechanical power output for the SEGR gas turbine system 52, as well as an increase in electrical power output of the generator 106 to the electrical grid 306 to accommodate the transient event, while still maintaining an equivalence ratio near approximately 1 (e.g., Φ between approximately 0.95 and 1.05).
Accordingly, throughout operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, the controller 118A may determine a desired MOC IGV position as dictated by the closed-loop control strategy based on the operational demands of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. Additionally, during normal operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (i.e., no transient grid events), the open-loop control strategy of the controller 118B may dictate the same desired MOC IGV position as is dictated by the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A. However, when a transient event is determined to be occurring in the electrical grid (e.g., via the sensors 310), the controller 118B may determine that the MOC IGV position should be a programmable or predetermined amount (e.g., 5%, 10%, or 15%) more open than the MOC IGV position dictated by the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A. Here, since the open-loop control strategy used by the controller 118B generally dictates a more open position for (e.g., a higher angle) the IGVs than the closed-loop control strategy used by controller 118A, the controller 118B prevails, invoking the control system 100 to send the appropriate control signals to the MOC IGVs 312 based on the position dictated by the controller 118B. In certain embodiments, the control system 100 may send the control signals to IGVs 312 immediately or after a programmable or predetermined time delay. Subsequently, the MOC IGVs 312 may remain in the more open position dictated by the controller 118B for a programmable or predetermined time delay (e.g., based on the typical length of time of a transient event on the electrical grid 306), after which the open-loop control strategy may dictate that the MOC IGVs 312 gradually return to the position dictated by the closed-loop strategy of controller 118A over a period of time (e.g., at programmable or predetermined ramp rate). Accordingly, at some point during this ramp, the open-loop control strategy of controller 118B will dictate the same MOC IGV position as the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A, effectively handing MOC IGV control back over to the controller 118A.
In certain embodiments, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 illustrated in
Furthermore, as illustrated in
For this example, the closed-loop control strategy of the controller 118A may dictate values for the operational parameters (e.g., position of the BOC IGVs, speed of the compressor 322 and/or the drive system 326, oxidant flow rate provided by the positions of control valves 328 and 330, a coolant flow rate for the heat exchanging device of the interstage cooling system 320, and so forth) of the components of the BOC 302 based on the current operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. During normal operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (i.e., no transient events detected in the electrical grid 306), the open-loop control strategy of the controller 118B may dictate values for the operational parameters of the BOC 302 that are the same as those dictated by the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A. However, upon detection of a transient event in the electrical grid 306, the controller 118B may dictate values for the operational parameters for the BOC 302 (e.g., immediately or after a programmable or predetermined time delay) that are a programmable or predetermined amount or percentage greater (e.g., providing 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, or 10% greater oxidant flow 300) than the values dictated by the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A. As a result of this higher oxidant flow dictated by the open-loop controller 118B, the abundance of the oxidant 68 in the combustor 160 also increases. As illustrated in
Accordingly, throughout operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, the controller 118A may determine values for the operational parameters of the BOC 302 (e.g., position of the BOC IGVs 324, speed of the compressor 322 and/or the drive system 326, oxidant flow rate provided by the positions of control valves 328 and 330, and so forth) as dictated by the closed-loop control strategy based on the operational demands of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. Additionally, during normal operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (i.e., no transient grid events), the open-loop control strategy of the controller 118B may dictate desired values for the operational parameters of the BOC 302 that are the same as those dictated by the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A. However, when a transient event is determined to be occurring in the electrical grid (e.g., via the sensors 310), the controller 118B may determine that the values for the operational parameters of the BOC 302 should be a programmable or predetermined amount (e.g., 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20%) higher (e.g., more open position for the BOC IGVs 324, a faster speed for the compressor 322 and/or the drive system 326, a higher oxidant flow rate through the control valves 328 and 330, a higher density compressed oxidant flow 300 through the interstage cooling system 320, etc.) than the values dictated by the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A.
For example, during a transient event, when the open-loop control strategy used by the controller 118B generally dictates a more open position (e.g., a higher angle) for the BOC IGVs 324 than the position dictated by the closed-loop control strategy used by controller 118A, the controller 118B prevails, invoking the control system 100 to send the appropriate control signals to the BOC IGVs 324 based on the position dictated by the controller 118B. In certain embodiments, the control system 100 may send the control signals to BOC 302 immediately (e.g., at the time of the transient event) or after a programmable or predetermined time delay. Subsequently, the BOC 302 may remain in the higher performance state dictated by the controller 118B for a programmable or predetermined time delay (e.g., based on the typical length of time of a transient event on the electrical grid 306), after which the open-loop control strategy may dictate that the values for the operational parameters of the BOC 302 should gradually return to the values dictated by the closed-loop strategy of controller 118A over a period of time (e.g., at a programmable or predetermined ramp rate). Accordingly, at some point during this ramp, the open-loop control strategy of controller 118B should dictate the same operational parameter values as the closed-loop control strategy of controller 118A, effectively handing control of the BOC 302 back over to the controller 118A.
In certain embodiments, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 illustrated in
Additionally, as illustrated in
Additionally, the control system 100 may provide control signals to modulate the position of and/or the flow rate of exhaust gas 42 through the product gas vent valve 350 and the product gas recycle valve 352. As illustrated in
With the foregoing in mind, during normal operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (e.g., no transient event in the electrical grid 306), the closed-loop controller 118A of the control system 100 may provide control signals to the various components of the EG supply system 78 to generally maintain a desired pressure in the EGR loop 305 based on the operation of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. For example, in certain embodiments, the closed-loop controller 118A may provide control signals to modulate the performance parameters (e.g., position of the IGVs 342, positions of the control valves 346 and 348, speed of the drive system 344, and so forth) of the product gas compressor 340 to increase or decrease the pressure of the exhaust gas 42 provided to the EG processing system 54 of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. In addition or in alternative to the performance parameters of the product gas compressor 340, in certain embodiments, the closed-loop controller 118A may provide control signals to open the product gas vent valve 350 to decrease the amount of the exhaust gas 42 delivered to the EG processing system 54 (e.g., decreasing pressure in the EG loop 305) and/or provide control signals to open the product gas recycle valve 352 to increase the amount of the exhaust gas 42 delivered to the EG processing system 54 (e.g., increasing pressure in the EG loop 305). In certain embodiments, the position of the control valves 350 and 352 may be modulated more quickly than the performance parameters of the product gas compressor 340 and may, therefore, provide more responsive control of the SEGR gas turbine system 52. Further, the closed-loop controller 118A may generally seek to maintain the product gas vent valve 350 and the product gas recycle valve 352 in substantially closed positions in order to ensure efficient operation (e.g., avoid unnecessary operation and power consumption) of the product gas compressor 340.
As mentioned, the control system 100 includes an open-loop controller 118B implemented in parallel with the closed-loop controller 118A, and the controller that dictates the lower performance parameter values for the product gas compressor 340 prevails. During normal operations of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (e.g., no transient event in the electrical grid 306), the open-loop control strategy utilized by the open-loop controller 118B may generally dictate values for the performance parameters (e.g., position of the IGVs 342, positions of the control valves 346 and 348, speed of the drive system 344, or another suitable performance parameter) for the product gas compressor 340 that are substantially the same as the values dictated by the closed-loop control strategy of the closed-loop controller 118A.
However, upon detection of a transient event in the electrical grid 306, the open-loop controller 118B may dictate (e.g., immediately or after a programmable or predetermined time delay) the implementation of performance parameter values for the product gas compressor 340 that are a programmable or predetermined amount (e.g., a fixed percentage) less than the performance parameter values currently dictated by the closed-loop controller 118A (e.g., a more closed position for the IGVs 342, a slower speed for the drive system 344, etc.). For example, upon detection of a transient event, the open-loop controller 118B may dictate that the speed of the drive system 344 (which determines the speed of the product gas compressor 340) should be set to a value that is a fixed percentage (e.g., 2%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, or another suitable percentage) less than the speed of the drive system 344 dictated by the closed-loop controller 118A. Accordingly, since the open-loop controller 118B dictates a lesser value for the performance parameter of the product gas compressor 340 than the closed-loop controller 118A, the open-loop controller 118B prevails, and the control system 100 provides the appropriate control signals to modulate the value of performance parameter of the product gas compressor 340 based on the dictates of the controller 118B.
It may be appreciated that temporarily reducing the values of the performance parameters of the product gas compressor 340 (e.g., using a more closed position for the IGVs 342, using a slower speed for the drive system 344, using a lower flow rate through the control valves 346 and 348, etc.) may result in the product gas compressor 340, as well as the SEGR gas turbine system 52 as a whole, consuming less electrical power. In certain embodiments, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 may consume at least a portion of the electrical power generated (e.g., by the generator 106 illustrated in
As such, when the open-loop controller 118B reduces the values of the performance parameters of the product gas compressor 340 by the programmable or predetermined amount (e.g., a fixed percentage) upon determining that a transient event is occurring or after a programmable delay time, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 may have additional electrical power available to support the electrical grid 306 during the transient event. In certain embodiments, while the open-loop controller 118B is in control of the performance parameters of the product gas compressor 340, the closed-loop controller 118A may continue to provide closed-loop control over the pressure of exhaust gas 42 in the EGR loop 305 by modulating the positions of the product gas vent control valve 350 and the product gas recycle control valve 352 to control the flow of exhaust gas 42 being delivered to the EG processing system 54. After a programmable delay time (e.g., a lifetime of a typical transient event in the electrical grid 306), the open-loop controller 118B may, at a programmable or predetermined ramp rate, gradually restore the values of the performance parameters of the product gas compressor 342 the values currently dictated by the closed-loop controller 118A, effectively handing control back over to the closed-loop controller 118A.
For Examples 1-4 discussed above, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 illustrated in
As discussed below, it is envisioned that the SEGR gas turbine system 52 (e.g., the ULET power plant) may be operated in two distinct modes: an emissions compliant mode in which the compressed oxidant stream and the fuel stream are coordinated to achieve a substantially stoichiometric ratio within the combustors 160, and a non-emissions compliant mode in which the compressed oxidant and fuel streams are coordinated so as to achieve fuel-lean combustion (e.g., a fuel-to-oxidant ratio less than that of stoichiometric combustion) within the combustors 160. As set forth below, embodiments of the present approach enable a further increase in oxidant abundance during loading, allowing the SEGR gas turbine system 52 to temporarily increase mechanical and electrical power output in order to respond to a transient event in the electrical grid 306 during loading.
With the foregoing in mind,
For the normal loading profile 402 of the SEGR gas turbine system 52, the equivalence ratio may steadily increase throughout regions 406, 408, and 410 such that the SEGR gas turbine system 52 may be operating at or near the stoichiometric ratio in the emissions compliant region (with PFR) 412. Across the non-emissions compliant region (with PFR) 408, the SEGR gas turbine system 52 may still address transient events (e.g., under frequency events) in the electrical grid 306. As discussed above, providing additional oxidant (as well as additional fuel) to the combustors 160 of the SEGR gas turbine system 52 during a transient event in the electrical grid 306 enables the SEGR gas turbine system 52 to quickly increase electrical power output to address the transient event. However, for the loading profile 402 illustrated in
In contrast, the loading profile 404 illustrated in
Technical effects of the present approach include enabling power exporting SEGR gas turbine systems, such as ULET power plants, to quickly increase mechanical and/or electrical power output in order to address transient events (e.g., frequency and/or voltage drops) in an attached electrical grid. In particular, certain present embodiments enable a ULET power plant to respond to transient grid events by enabling a rapid increase an amount of available oxidant in a combustor, coordinated with a rapid increase in the supply of fuel to the combustor, in order to quickly increase the mechanical and electrical power of the plant, while still maintaining an equivalence ratio at or near approximately 1. Additionally, certain embodiments may enable a ULET power plant to respond to transient grid events by enabling an increased amount of available oxidant (e.g., equivalence ratio less than 0.5) in the combustor throughout portions of plant loading (e.g., during start-up, when operating in a non-emission complaint mode) such that a rapid addition of fuel to the combustor quickly increases the mechanical and electrical power output of the plant. Other presently disclosed embodiments may enable a ULET power plant to support the electrical grid during transient events by reducing or limiting operations of certain components (e.g., a product gas compressor) of the ULET power plant in order to reduce or limit electrical power consumption within the power plant, which may temporarily increase the amount of electrical power exported from the plant.
The present embodiments provide a system and method that enable an EGR gas turbine system (e.g., a ULET power plant) to respond to transient events (e.g., under frequency or under voltage events) in an attached power grid. The following clauses are offered as further description of the present disclosure:
A grid disturbance response method, comprising the steps of: introducing an oxidant and a first portion of a recirculated low oxygen content gas stream to at least one oxidant compressor to produce a compressed oxidant stream; introducing the compressed oxidant stream and a fuel stream in a substantially stoichiometric ratio to at least one gas turbine engine combustor and substantially mixing the said compressed oxidant stream and the said fuel stream at a location that is at least one of prior to the point of combustion or at the point of combustion; combusting said mixture of the said compressed oxidant stream and the said fuel stream to produce a high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream; introducing the high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream to an expander section of the said gas turbine engine and expanding the high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream to produce mechanical power and a recirculated low oxygen content gas stream; using a first portion of the mechanical power to drive the compressor section of said gas turbine engine; using a second portion of the mechanical power to drive at least one of: a generator, the said at least one oxidant compressor or at least one other mechanical device; exporting at least a portion of the generator power to at least one of a local electrical grid or a remote electrical grid; detecting a grid transient event; and reducing the flow rate of the first portion of a recirculated low oxygen content gas stream thereby increasing the oxygen content of the compressed oxidant stream, increasing the fuel flow rate to maintain a substantially stoichiometric ratio and increasing the power output of the gas turbine engine.
A grid disturbance response method, comprising the steps of: introducing an oxidant to at least one oxidant compressor to produce a compressed oxidant stream; controlling the flow rate of the compressed oxidant stream by modulating at least one of the inlet guide vanes of the oxidant compressor, variable stator vanes or the oxidant compressor or the rotational speed of the oxidant compressor by a closed-loop feedback control system; introducing the compressed oxidant stream and a fuel stream in a substantially stoichiometric ratio to at least one gas turbine engine combustor and substantially mixing the said compressed oxidant stream and the said fuel stream at a location that is at least one of prior to the point of combustion or at the point of combustion; combusting said mixture of the said compressed oxidant stream and the said fuel stream to produce a high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream; introducing the high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream to an expander section of the said gas turbine engine and expanding the high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream to produce mechanical power and a recirculated low oxygen content gas stream; using a first portion of the mechanical power to drive the compressor section of said gas turbine engine; using a second portion of the mechanical power to drive at least one of: a generator, the said at least one oxidant compressor or at least one other mechanical device; exporting at least a portion of the generator power to at least one of a local electrical grid or a remote electrical grid; detecting a grid transient event; transferring the said closed-loop feedback controller to an open-loop mode and increasing the compressed oxidant flow rate by adjusting at least one of the said inlet guide vanes, the said variable stator vanes or the said oxidant compressor speed; and increasing the fuel flow rate to maintain a substantially stoichiometric ratio and increasing the power output of the gas turbine engine.
A grid disturbance response method, comprising the steps of: introducing an oxidant to an oxidant compressor and at least one booster oxidant compressors to produce a compressed oxidant stream; controlling the flow rate of the compressed oxidant stream by modulating at least one of the inlet guide vanes of the booster oxidant compressor, variable stator vanes of the booster oxidant compressor or the rotational speed of the booster oxidant compressor by a closed-loop feedback control system; introducing the compressed oxidant stream and a fuel stream in a substantially stoichiometric ratio to at least one gas turbine engine combustor and substantially mixing the said compressed oxidant stream and the said fuel stream at a location that is at least one of prior to the point of combustion or at the point of combustion; combusting said mixture of the said compressed oxidant stream and the said fuel stream to produce a high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream; introducing the high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream to an expander section of the said gas turbine engine and expanding the high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream to produce mechanical power and a recirculated low oxygen content gas stream; using a first portion of the mechanical power to drive the compressor section of said gas turbine engine; using a second portion of the mechanical power to drive at least one of: a generator, the said one oxidant compressor, the said at least one booster oxidant compressor or at least one other mechanical device; exporting at least a portion of the generator power to at least one of a local electrical grid or a remote electrical grid; detecting a grid transient event; transferring the said closed-loop feedback controller to an open-loop mode and increasing the compressed oxidant flow rate by adjusting at least one of the said inlet guide vanes, the said variable stator vanes or the said booster oxidant compressor speed; and increasing the fuel flow rate to maintain a substantially stoichiometric ratio and increasing the power output of the gas turbine engine.
A grid disturbance response method, comprising the steps of: introducing an oxidant to at least one oxidant compressor to produce a compressed oxidant stream; introducing the compressed oxidant stream and a fuel stream in a substantially stoichiometric ratio to at least one gas turbine engine combustor and substantially mixing the said compressed oxidant stream and the said fuel stream at a location that is at least one of prior to the point of combustion or at the point of combustion; combusting said mixture of the said compressed oxidant stream and the said fuel stream to produce a high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream; introducing the high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream to an expander section of the said gas turbine engine and expanding the high temperature high pressure low oxygen content stream to produce mechanical power and a recirculated low oxygen content gas stream; using a first portion of the mechanical power to drive the compressor section of said gas turbine engine; using a second portion of the mechanical power to drive at least one of a generator, the said at least one oxidant compressor or at least one other mechanical device; exporting at least a portion of the generator power to at least one of a local electrical grid or a remote electrical grid; extracting a second portion of the recirculated low oxygen content gas stream and introducing the said second portion to a product gas compressor to produce a compressed product gas stream; controlling the flow rate of the compressed product gas stream by modulating at least one of the inlet guide vanes of the product gas compressor, variable stator vanes of the product gas compressor or the rotational speed of the product gas compressor by a closed-loop feedback control system and delivering a first portion of the compressed product gas stream to at least one of a delivery point or storage facility; venting a third portion of the recirculated low oxygen content gas stream and controlling the flow rate of the said third portion of the recirculated low oxygen content gas stream by a closed-loop feedback control system; recycling a second portion of the compressed product gas stream to the recirculated low oxygen content gas stream and controlling the flow rate of the said second portion of the compressed product gas stream by a closed-loop feedback control system; controlling the flow rates of the said compressor product gas stream, the said third portion of the recirculated low oxygen content gas stream and the said second portion of the compressed product gas stream by an integrated control system to control at least the pressure of the said recirculated low oxygen content gas stream; detecting a grid transient event; and transferring the said compressed product gas stream closed-loop feedback controller to an open-loop mode and decreasing the compressed product gas flow rate by adjusting at least one of the said product gas compressor inlet guide vanes, the said product gas compressor variable stator vanes or the said product gas compressor speed and increasing the power available for export.
The method of any preceding embodiment, further comprising a partitioning of a ULET plant operating region into an emissions compliant zone and a non-emissions compliant zone.
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein the gas turbine combustion equivalence ratio is controlled at a minimum level within the non-emissions compliant zone so as to maximize the oxygen available within the EGR loop in support of the traditional primary frequency response (PFR) methods
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein the transition from non-emissions compliant zone of operation to the emissions compliant zone of operation is effected by a rapid transition from a lean combustion (low equivalence ratio) to a substantially stoichiometric combustion (equivalence ratio approximately equal to 1).
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein the transition from lean combustion to stoichiometric combustion is effected within a narrow zone with respect to plant load wherein the ULET plant control system may be temporarily rendered insensitive to grid frequency variations.
A method, comprising: combusting a fuel and an oxidant in a combustor of an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) gas turbine system that produces electrical power and provides a portion of the electrical power to an electrical grid; and controlling one or more parameters of the EGR gas turbine system to increase the portion of the electrical power provided to the electrical grid in response to a transient event associated with the electrical grid, wherein controlling comprises one or more of: (A) increasing a flow rate of fuel to the combustor in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in a fuel-lean combustion mode; (B) increasing a concentration and/or the flow rate of the oxidant in the combustor in response to the transient event, and increasing a flow rate of the fuel to the combustor in response to the increased concentration of the oxidant to maintain a substantially stoichiometric equivalence ratio in the combustor; or (C) decreasing a local consumption of the electrical power in response to the transient event to increase the portion of electrical power provided to the electrical grid.
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein operating the EGR gas turbine system in fuel-lean combustion mode comprises operating the combustor of the EGR gas turbine system with excess oxidant present, and wherein increasing the flow rate of fuel to the combustor comprises temporarily increasing the flow rate of fuel to the combustor in response to the transient event.
The method of any preceding embodiment, comprising introducing an inlet flow comprising the oxidant and a recirculated exhaust gas to an oxidant compressor disposed upstream of the combustor in the EGR gas turbine system, and wherein increasing the concentration of the oxidant in the combustor comprises increasing a ratio of the oxidant to the recirculated exhaust gas in the inlet flow in response to the transient event.
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein the flow rate of the recirculated exhaust gas is decreased by a programmable amount from a higher flow rate to a lower flow rate immediately or after a first programmable time delay subsequent to the transient event; and further comprising gradually increasing the flow rate of the recirculated exhaust gas to the higher flow rate after a second programmable time delay subsequent to decreasing the flow rate of the recirculated exhaust gas.
The method of any preceding embodiment, comprising controlling one or more performance parameters of at least one oxidant compressor disposed upstream of the combustor in the EGR gas turbine system, and wherein increasing the concentration of the oxidant in the combustor comprises increasing the one or more performance parameters of the at least one oxidant compressor in response to the transient event, and wherein the at least one oxidant compressor comprises a main oxidant compressor, a booster oxidant compressor, or a combination thereof.
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein the one or more performance parameters of the at least one oxidant compressor comprise: an inlet guide vane position, a variable stator vane position, a speed, an inlet throttle valve position, a discharge throttle valve position, or a recycle valve position.
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein increasing the one or more performance parameters of the at least one oxidant compressor comprises increasing the one or more performance parameters of the at least one oxidant compressor by a programmable amount from a lower performance setting to a higher performance setting immediately or after a first programmable time delay subsequent to the transient event; and further comprising gradually decreasing the one or more performance parameters of the at least one oxidant compressor to the lower performance setting after a second programmable time delay subsequent to increasing the one or more performance parameters of the at least one oxidant compressor.
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein decreasing the local consumption of the electrical power comprises reducing one or more performance parameters of a product gas compressor by a programmable amount from a higher performance setting to a lower performance setting immediately or after a first programmable time delay subsequent to the transient event; and further comprising gradually increasing the one or more performance parameters of the product gas compressor to the higher performance setting after a second programmable time delay subsequent to decreasing the one or more performance parameters of the product gas compressor.
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein the one or more performance parameters of the product gas compressor comprise: an inlet guide vane position, a variable stator vane position, a speed, an inlet throttle valve position, a discharge throttle valve position, or a recycle valve position.
The method of any preceding embodiment, comprising temporarily increasing one or more programmable constraints of the EGR gas turbine system immediately or after a first programmable time delay subsequent to the transient event, and wherein the one or more programmable constraints of the EGR gas turbine system comprise a torque limit, a speed limit, a pressure limit, a flow rate limit, or a power limit of the EGR gas turbine system.
The method of any preceding embodiment, wherein the EGR gas turbine system is part of an ultra-low emissions technology (ULET) power plant.
A system, comprising: an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) gas turbine system, comprising: a combustor configured to receive and combust a fuel with an oxidant; and a turbine driven by combustion products from the combustor; a generator driven by the turbine, wherein the generator is configured to generate electrical power and to export a portion of the electrical power to an electrical grid; and a control system, comprising: a closed-loop controller configured to control one or more parameters of the EGR gas turbine system; and an open-loop controller configured to temporarily control the one or more parameters of the EGR gas turbine system to increase the portion of the electrical power exported to the electrical grid in response to a transient event, wherein open-loop controller is configured to: provide control signals to increase a flow rate of fuel to the combustor in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in a non-emissions compliant mode; and provide control signals to increase a concentration of the oxidant in the combustor, or decrease a local consumption of the electrical power, or both, in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in an emissions compliant mode.
The system of any preceding embodiment, wherein the closed-loop controller is configured to provide control signals to increase the flow rate of the fuel to the combustor in response to the increased concentration of the oxidant to maintain a substantially stoichiometric equivalence ratio in the combustor.
The system of any preceding embodiment, comprising at least one oxidant compressor disposed upstream of the combustor and configured to receive an inlet flow comprising an oxidant flow and a recirculated exhaust gas flow, wherein the open-loop controller is configured to provide control signals to a control valve to increase a ratio of the oxidant flow to the recirculated exhaust gas flow by reducing the recirculated exhaust gas flow in response to the transient event.
The system of any preceding embodiment, comprising at least one oxidant compressor disposed upstream of the combustor, and wherein the open-loop controller is configured to provide control signals to the at least one oxidant compressor to modulate one or more performance parameters of the at least one oxidant compressor in response to the transient event, and wherein the one or more performance parameters of the at least one oxidant compressor comprise: an inlet guide vane position, a variable stator vane position, a speed, an inlet throttle valve position, a discharge throttle valve position, or a recycle valve position.
The system of any preceding embodiment, comprising a product gas compressor configured to receive and compress a flow of exhaust gas from an exhaust gas recirculation (ERG) loop of the EGR gas turbine system, wherein the open-loop controller is configured to provide control signals to the product gas compressor to modulate one or more of: an inlet guide vane position, a variable stator vane position, a speed, an inlet throttle valve position, a discharge throttle valve position, or a recycle valve position of the product gas compressor in order to decrease the local consumption of the electrical power by the product gas compressor.
The system of any preceding embodiment, wherein the control system is configured to provide control signals to maintain an equivalence ratio of between approximately 0.3 and 0.7 in the combustor of the EGR gas turbine system when the EGR gas turbine system is operated in the non-emissions compliant mode.
A non-transitory, computer readable medium storing instructions executable by a processor of an electronic device, the instructions including: instructions to determine that a transient event is occurring in an electrical grid coupled to an EGR gas turbine system, wherein the transient event is an under-frequency or an under-voltage event; instructions to increase a flow rate of fuel to a combustor of the EGR gas turbine system in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in a non-stoichiometric combustion mode; and instructions to increase a flow rate of oxidant to the combustor before increasing the flow rate of fuel to the combustor, or to decrease a local consumption of the electrical power to increase a portion of the electrical power that is exported to the attached electrical grid, or both, in response to the transient event when the EGR gas turbine system is operating in a stoichiometric combustion mode.
The medium of any preceding embodiment, wherein the instructions to increase the flow rate of oxidant to the combustor comprise instructions to provide a control signal to a control valve disposed upstream of an oxidant compressor in an EGR loop of the EGR gas turbine system to decrease a flow of recirculated exhaust gas to an inlet of the oxidant compressor in response to the transient event.
The medium of any preceding embodiment, wherein the instructions to increase the flow rate of oxidant to the combustor comprise instruction to modulate one or more of: an inlet guide vane position, a variable stator vane position, a speed, an inlet throttle valve position, a discharge throttle valve position, or a recycle valve position of at least one oxidant compressor disposed upstream of the combustor in response to the transient event to increase performance of the at least one oxidant compressor.
The medium of any preceding embodiment, wherein the instructions to decrease the local consumption of the electrical power comprise instructions to modulate one or more of: an inlet guide vane position, a variable stator vane position, a speed, an inlet throttle valve position, a discharge throttle valve position, or a recycle valve position, of a product gas compressor to reduce power consumption by the product gas compressor.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/585,950, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A STOICHIOMETRIC EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION GAS TURBINE SYSTEM,” filed Dec. 30, 2014, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,079,564 on Sep. 18, 2018, and which claims priority to and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/932,178, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A STOICHIOMETRIC EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION GAS TURBINE SYSTEM,” filed on Jan. 27, 2014, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2488911 | Hepburn et al. | Nov 1949 | A |
| 2884758 | Oberle | May 1959 | A |
| 3631672 | Gentile et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3643430 | Emory et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3705492 | Vickers | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3841382 | Gravis et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3949548 | Lockwood | Apr 1976 | A |
| 4018046 | Hurley | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4043395 | Every et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4050239 | Kappler et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4066214 | Johnson | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4077206 | Ayyagari | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4085578 | Kydd | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4092095 | Straitz | May 1978 | A |
| 4101294 | Kimura | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4112676 | DeCorso | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4117671 | Neal et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4160640 | Maev et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4165609 | Rudolph | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4171349 | Cucuiat et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4204401 | Earnest | May 1980 | A |
| 4222240 | Castellano | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4224991 | Sowa et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4236378 | Vogt | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4253301 | Vogt | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4271664 | Earnest | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4344486 | Parrish | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4345426 | Egnell et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4352269 | Dineen | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4380895 | Adkins | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4399652 | Cole et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4414334 | Hitzman | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4434613 | Stahl | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4435153 | Hashimoto et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4442665 | Fick et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4445842 | Syska | May 1984 | A |
| 4479484 | Davis | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4480985 | Davis | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4488865 | Davis | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4498288 | Vogt | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4498289 | Osgerby | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4528811 | Stahl | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4543784 | Kicker | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4548034 | Maguire | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4561245 | Ball | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4569310 | Davis | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4577462 | Robertson | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4602614 | Percival et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4606721 | Livingston | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4613299 | Backheim | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4637792 | Davis | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4651712 | Davis | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4653278 | Vinson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4681678 | Leaseburge et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4684465 | Leaseburge et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4753666 | Pastor et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4762543 | Pantermuehl et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4817387 | Lashbrook | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4858428 | Paul | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4895710 | Hartmann et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4898001 | Kuroda et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4946597 | Sury | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4976100 | Lee | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5014785 | Puri et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5044932 | Martin et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5073105 | Martin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5084438 | Matsubara et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085274 | Puri et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5098282 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5123248 | Monty et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5135387 | Martin et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5141049 | Larsen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5142866 | Yanagihara et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5147111 | Montgomery | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5154596 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5183232 | Gale | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5195884 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197289 | Glevicky et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5238395 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5255506 | Wilkes et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5265410 | Hisatome | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5271905 | Owen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5275552 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5295350 | Child et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5304362 | Madsen | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5325660 | Taniguchi et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5332036 | Shirley et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5344307 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5345756 | Jahnke et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5355668 | Weil et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5359847 | Pillsbury et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5361586 | McWhirter et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5388395 | Scharpf et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5394688 | Amos | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5402847 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5444971 | Holenberger | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5457951 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5458481 | Surbey et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5468270 | Borszynski | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5490378 | Berger et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5542840 | Surbey et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5566756 | Chaback et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5572862 | Mowill | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5581998 | Craig | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584182 | Althaus et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5590518 | Janes | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5628182 | Mowill | May 1997 | A |
| 5634329 | Andersson et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5638675 | Zysman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5640840 | Briesch | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5657631 | Androsov | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5680764 | Viteri | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5685158 | Lenahan et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5709077 | Beichel | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713206 | McWhirter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5715673 | Beichel | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724805 | Golomb et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725054 | Shayegi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5740786 | Gartner | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5743079 | Walsh et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5765363 | Mowill | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5771867 | Amstutz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5771868 | Khair | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5819540 | Massarani | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5832712 | Ronning et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836164 | Tsukahara et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839283 | Dobbeling | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5850732 | Willis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5894720 | Willis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5901547 | Smith et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5924275 | Cohen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930990 | Zachary et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5937634 | Etheridge et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950417 | Robertson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956937 | Beichel | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5968349 | Duyvesteyn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974780 | Santos | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5992388 | Seger | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6016658 | Willis et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6032465 | Regnier | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6035641 | Lokhandwala | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038849 | Nakhamkin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6062026 | Woollenweber et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6079974 | Thompson | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6082093 | Greenwood et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6089855 | Becker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094916 | Puri et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101983 | Anand et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6148602 | Demetri | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6170264 | Viteri et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183241 | Bohn et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6201029 | Waycuilis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6202400 | Utamura et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6202442 | Brugerolle | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6202574 | Liljedahl et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209325 | Alkabie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216459 | Daudel et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216549 | Davis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6230103 | DeCorso et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6237339 | Åsen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6247315 | Marin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6247316 | Viteri | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248794 | Gieskes | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253555 | Willis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6256976 | Kataoka et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6256994 | Dillon, IV | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263659 | Dillon, IV et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266954 | McCallum et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269882 | Wellington et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6276171 | Brugerolle | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282901 | Marin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6283087 | Isaksen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6289677 | Prociw et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6298652 | Mittricker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6298654 | Vermes et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6298664 | Åsen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301888 | Gray | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301889 | Gladden et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6305929 | Chung et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6314721 | Mathews et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324867 | Fanning et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332313 | Willis et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6345493 | Smith et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6360528 | Brausch et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363709 | Kataoka et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6367258 | Wen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6370870 | Kamijo et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374591 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374594 | Kraft et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6383461 | Lang | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6389814 | Viteri et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6405536 | Ho et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6412278 | Matthews | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6412302 | Foglietta | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6412559 | Gunter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6418725 | Maeda et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429020 | Thornton et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6449954 | Bachmann | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6450256 | Mones | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6461147 | Sonju et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6467270 | Mulloy et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6470682 | Gray | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6477859 | Wong et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6484503 | Raz | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6484507 | Pradt | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487863 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499990 | Zink et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6502383 | Janardan et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6505567 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6505683 | Minkkinen et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6508209 | Collier | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6523349 | Viteri | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6532745 | Neary | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6539716 | Finger et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6584775 | Schneider et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6598398 | Viteri et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6598399 | Liebig | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6598402 | Kataoka et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6606861 | Snyder | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6612291 | Sakamoto | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6615576 | Sheoran et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6615589 | Allam et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6622470 | Viteri et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6622645 | Havlena | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6637183 | Viteri et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6644041 | Eyermann | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6655150 | Åsen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6668541 | Rice et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6672863 | Doebbeling et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6675579 | Yang | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6684643 | Frutschi | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6694735 | Sumser et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6698412 | Betta | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6702570 | Shah et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6722436 | Krill | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6725665 | Tuschy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6731501 | Cheng | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6732531 | Dickey | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6742506 | Grandin | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6743829 | Fischer-Calderon et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6745573 | Marin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6745624 | Porter et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6748004 | Jepson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6752620 | Heier et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6767527 | Åsen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6772583 | Bland | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6790030 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6794766 | Wickert et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6805483 | Tomlinson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6810673 | Snyder | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6813889 | Inoue et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6817187 | Yu | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6820428 | Wylie | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6821501 | Matzakos et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823852 | Collier | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6824710 | Viteri et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6826912 | Levy et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6826913 | Wright | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6838071 | Olsvik et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6851413 | Tamol | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6868677 | Viteri et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6886334 | Shirakawa | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6887069 | Thornton et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6899859 | Olsvik | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6901760 | Dittmann et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6904815 | Widmer | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6907737 | Mittricker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6910335 | Viteri et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6923915 | Alford et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6939130 | Abbasi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6945029 | Viteri | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6945052 | Frutschi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6945087 | Porter et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6945089 | Barie et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6946419 | Kaefer | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6969123 | Vinegar et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6971242 | Boardman | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6981358 | Bellucci et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6988549 | Babcock | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6993901 | Shirakawa | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6993916 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6994491 | Kittle | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7007487 | Belokon et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7010921 | Intile et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7011154 | Maher et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7015271 | Bice et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7032388 | Healy | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7040400 | de Rouffignac et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7043898 | Rago | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7043920 | Viteri et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7045553 | Hershkowitz | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053128 | Hershkowitz | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7056482 | Hakia et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7059152 | Oakey et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7065953 | Kopko | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7065972 | Zupanc et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7074033 | Neary | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7077199 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7089743 | Frutschi et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7096942 | de Rouffignac et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7097925 | Keefer | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7104319 | Vinegar et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7104784 | Hasegawa et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7124589 | Neary | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7137256 | Stuttaford et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7137623 | Mockry et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143572 | Ooka et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7143606 | Tranier | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7146969 | Weirich | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7147461 | Neary | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7148261 | Hershkowitz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152409 | Yee et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7162875 | Fletcher et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7168265 | Briscoe et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7168488 | Olsvik et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7183328 | Hershkowitz et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7185497 | Dudebout et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194869 | McQuiggan et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197880 | Thornton et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7217303 | Hershkowitz et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7225623 | Koshoffer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7237385 | Carrea | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7284362 | Marin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7299619 | Briesch et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7299868 | Zapadinski | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7302801 | Chen | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7305817 | Blodgett et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7305831 | Carrea et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7313916 | Pellizzari | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7318317 | Carrea | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7343742 | Wimmer et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7353655 | Bolis et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7357857 | Hart et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363756 | Carrea et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363764 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7381393 | Lynn | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7401577 | Saucedo et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7410525 | Liu et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7416137 | Hagen et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7434384 | Lord et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7438744 | Beaumont | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7467942 | Carroni et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7468173 | Hughes et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7472550 | Lear et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7481048 | Harmon et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7481275 | Olsvik et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7482500 | Johann et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7485761 | Schindler et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7488857 | Johann et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7490472 | Lynghjem et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7491250 | Hershkowitz et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7492054 | Catlin | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7493769 | Jangili | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7498009 | Leach et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7503178 | Bucker et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7503948 | Hershkowitz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7506501 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7513099 | Nuding et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7513100 | Motter et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7516626 | Brox et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7520134 | Durbin et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7523603 | Hagen et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7536252 | Hibshman et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7536873 | Nohlen | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7540150 | Schmid et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7559977 | Fleischer et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7562519 | Harris et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7562529 | Kuspert et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7566394 | Koseoglu | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7574856 | Mak | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7591866 | Bose | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7594386 | Narayanan et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7610752 | Betta et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7610759 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7611681 | Kaefer | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7614352 | Anthony et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7618606 | Fan et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7631493 | Shirakawa et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634915 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7635408 | Mak et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7637093 | Rao | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7644573 | Smith et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7650744 | Varatharajan et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7654320 | Payton | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7654330 | Zubrin et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7655071 | De Vreede | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7670135 | Zink et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7673454 | Saito et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7673685 | Shaw et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7674443 | Davis | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7677309 | Shaw et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7681394 | Haugen | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7682597 | Blumenfeld et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7690204 | Drnevich et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7691788 | Tan et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7695703 | Sobolevskiy et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7717173 | Grott | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7721543 | Massey et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7726114 | Evulet | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7734408 | Shiraki | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7739864 | Finkenrath et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7749311 | Saito et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7752848 | Balan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7752850 | Laster et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7753039 | Harima et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7753972 | Zubrin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7762084 | Martis et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7763163 | Koseoglu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7763227 | Wang | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7765810 | Pfefferle | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7788897 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7789159 | Bader | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7789658 | Towler et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7789944 | Saito et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7793494 | Wirth et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7802434 | Varatharajan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7815873 | Sankaranarayanan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7815892 | Hershkowitz et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7819951 | White et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7824179 | Hasegawa et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7827778 | Finkenrath et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7827794 | Pronske et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7841186 | So et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7845406 | Nitschke | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7846401 | Hershkowitz et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7861511 | Chillar et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7874140 | Fan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7874350 | Pfefferle | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7875402 | Hershkowitz et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7882692 | Pronske et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7886522 | Kammel | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7895822 | Hoffmann et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7896105 | Dupriest | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7906304 | Kohr | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7909898 | White et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7914749 | Carstens et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7914764 | Hershkowitz et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7918906 | Zubrin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7921633 | Rising | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7922871 | Price et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7926292 | Rabovitser et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7931712 | Zubrin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7931731 | Van Heeringen et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7931888 | Drnevich et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7934926 | Kornbluth et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7942003 | Baudoin et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7942008 | Joshi et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7943097 | Golden et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7955403 | Ariyapadi et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7966822 | Myers et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7976803 | Hooper et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7980312 | Hill et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7985399 | Drnevich et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7988750 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8001789 | Vega et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8029273 | Paschereit et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8036813 | Tonetti et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8038416 | Ono et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8038746 | Clark | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8038773 | Ochs et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8046986 | Chillar et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8047007 | Zubrin et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8051638 | Aljabari et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8061120 | Hwang | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8062617 | Stakhev et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8065870 | Jobson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8065874 | Fong et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8074439 | Foret | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8080225 | Dickinson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8083474 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8097230 | Mesters et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8101146 | Fedeyko et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8105559 | Melville et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8110012 | Chin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8117825 | Griffin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8117846 | Wilbraham | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8127558 | Bland et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8127936 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8127937 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8133298 | Lanyi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8166766 | Draper | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8167960 | Gil | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8176982 | Gil et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8191360 | Fong et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8191361 | Fong et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8196387 | Shah et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8196413 | Mak | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8201402 | Fong et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8205455 | Popovic | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8206669 | Schaffer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8209192 | Gil et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8215105 | Fong et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8220247 | Wijmans et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8220248 | Wijmans et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8220268 | Callas | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225600 | Theis | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8226912 | Kloosterman et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8240142 | Fong et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8240153 | Childers et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8245492 | Draper | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8245493 | Minto | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8247462 | Boshoff et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8257476 | White et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8261823 | Hill et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8262343 | Hagen | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8266883 | Ouellet et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8266913 | Snook et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8268044 | Wright et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8281596 | Rohrssen et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8316665 | Mak | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8316784 | D'Agostini | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8337613 | Zauderer | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8347600 | Wichmann et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8348551 | Baker et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8371100 | Draper | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8372251 | Goller et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8377184 | Fujikawa et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8377401 | Darde et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8388919 | Hooper et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8397482 | Kraemer et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8398757 | Iijima et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8409307 | Drnevich et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8414694 | Iijima et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8424282 | Vollmer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8424601 | Betzer-Zilevitch | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8436489 | Stahlkopf et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8453461 | Draper | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8453462 | Wichmann et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8453583 | Malavasi et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8454350 | Berry et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8475160 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8539749 | Wichmann et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8567200 | Brook et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8616294 | Zubrin et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8627643 | Chillar et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 9574496 | Fadde et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9581081 | Biyani et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9631815 | Antoniono et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 20010000049 | Kataoka et al. | Mar 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029732 | Bachmann | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010045090 | Gray | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020043063 | Kataoka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020053207 | Finger et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069648 | Levy et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187449 | Doebbeling et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005698 | Keller | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030131582 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134241 | Marin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030221409 | McGowan | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006994 | Walsh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068981 | Siefker et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040166034 | Kaefer | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170559 | Hershkowitz et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223408 | Mathys et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040238654 | Hagen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050028529 | Bartlett et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144961 | Colibaba-Evulet et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197267 | Zaki et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229585 | Webster | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050236602 | Viteri et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060112675 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060158961 | Ruscheweyh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183009 | Berlowitz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060196812 | Beetge et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248888 | Geskes | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070000242 | Harmon et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070006592 | Balan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070044475 | Leser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070044479 | Brandt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070089425 | Motter et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070107430 | Schmid et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070144747 | Steinberg | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070231233 | Bose | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234702 | Hagen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070245736 | Barnicki | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070249738 | Haynes et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070272201 | Amano et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080000229 | Kuspert et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080006561 | Moran et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080010967 | Griffin et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080034727 | Sutikno | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038598 | Berlowitz et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080047280 | Dubar | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080066443 | Frutschi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115478 | Sullivan | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080118310 | Graham | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080127632 | Finkenrath et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155984 | Liu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080178611 | Ding | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080202123 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080223038 | Lutz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250795 | Katdare et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080251234 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080290719 | Kaminsky et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080309087 | Evulet et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090000762 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090025390 | Christensen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090038247 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090056342 | Kirzhner | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090064653 | Hagen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090071166 | Hagen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090107141 | Chillar et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090117024 | Weedon et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090120087 | Sumser et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157230 | Hibshman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193809 | Schroder et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090205334 | Aljabari et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090218821 | Elkady et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090223227 | Lipinski et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090229263 | Ouellet et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235637 | Foret | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090241506 | Nilsson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090255242 | Paterson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262599 | Kohrs et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090284013 | Anand et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090301054 | Simpson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090301099 | Nigro | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100003123 | Smith | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100018218 | Riley et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058732 | Kaufmann et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100115960 | Brautsch et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100126176 | Kim | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100126906 | Sury | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162703 | Li et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170253 | Berry et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100180565 | Draper | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100300102 | Bathina et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100310356 | Swintek | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100310439 | Brok et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100322759 | Tanioka | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100326084 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110000221 | Minta et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110000671 | Hershkowitz et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110036082 | Collinot | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110048002 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110048010 | Balcezak et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110072779 | ELKady et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110088379 | Nanda | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110110759 | Sanchez et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110126512 | Anderson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138766 | ELKady et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110162353 | Vanvolsem et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110205837 | Gentgen | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110226010 | Baxter | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110227346 | Klenven | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110232545 | Clements | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110239653 | Valeev et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110257801 | Kumula et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110265447 | Cunningham | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110300493 | Mittricker et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120023954 | Wichmann | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023955 | Draper | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023956 | Popovic | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023957 | Draper et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023958 | Snook et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023959 | Snook | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023960 | Minto | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023962 | Wichmann et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023963 | Wichmann et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023966 | Ouellet | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120031581 | Chillar et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120032810 | Chillar et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120085100 | Hughes et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120096870 | Wichmann et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120119512 | Draper | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120131925 | Mittricker et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120144837 | Rasmussen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185144 | Draper | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120192565 | Tretyakov et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120247105 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120260660 | Kraemer et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130086916 | Oelfke et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130086917 | Slobodyanskiy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130091853 | Denton et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130091854 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130104562 | Oelfke et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130104563 | Oelfke et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130125554 | Mittricker et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130125555 | Mittricker et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130232980 | Chen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269310 | Wichmann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269311 | Wichmann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269355 | Wichmann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269356 | Butkiewicz et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269357 | Wichmann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269358 | Wichmann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269360 | Wichmann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269361 | Wichmann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269362 | Wichmann et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130283808 | Kolvick | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130340404 | Hughes | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140000271 | Mittricker et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140000273 | Mittricker et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140007590 | Huntington et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140013766 | Mittricker et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140020398 | Mittricker et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140060073 | Slobodyanskiy et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123620 | Huntington et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123624 | Minto | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123659 | Biyani et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123660 | Stoia et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123668 | Huntington et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123669 | Huntington et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123672 | Huntington et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140182298 | Krull et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140182303 | Antoniono et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140182304 | Antoniono et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140182305 | Antoniono et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150226133 | Minto et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2231749 | Sep 1998 | CA |
| 2645450 | Sep 2007 | CA |
| 0770771 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0776269 | Jun 1957 | GB |
| 2117053 | Oct 1983 | GB |
| 2003239763 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2004027848 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2007315398 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2008051099 | Mar 2008 | JP |
| 2013048541 | Mar 2013 | JP |
| 2013213496 | Oct 2013 | JP |
| 2034192 | Apr 1995 | RU |
| 1744290 | Jun 1992 | SU |
| WO1999006674 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO1999063210 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO2007068682 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO2008142009 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO2011003606 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| WO2012003489 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| WO2012128928 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| WO2012128929 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| WO2012170114 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| WO2013147632 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO2013147633 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO2013155214 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO2013163045 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO2014071118 | May 2014 | WO |
| WO2014071215 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014133406 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ahmed, S. et al. (1998) “Catalytic Partial Oxidation Reforming of Hydrocarbon Fuels,” 1998 Fuel Cell Seminar, 7 pgs. |
| Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2008) “Air Separation Technology—Ion Transport Membrane (ITM),” www.airproducts.com/ASUsales, 3 pgs. |
| Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2011) “Air Separation Technology Ion Transport Membrane (ITM),” www.airproducts.com/gasification, 4 pgs. |
| Anderson, R. E. (2006) “Durability and Reliability Demonstration of a Near-Zero-Emission Gas-Fired Power Plant,” California Energy Comm., CEC 500-2006-074, 80 pgs. |
| Baxter, E. et al. (2003) “Fabricate and Test an Advanced Non-Polluting Turbine Drive Gas Generator,” U. S. Dept. of Energy, Nat'l Energy Tech. Lab., DE-FC26-00NT 40804, 51 pgs. |
| Holland, O. et al. (1998) “Removal of CO2 From Gas Turbine Power Plants Evaluation of Pre- and Postcombustion Methods,” SINTEF Group, www.energy.sintef.no/publ/xergi/98/3/art-8engelsk.htm, 11 pgs. |
| BP Press Release (2006) “BP and Edison Mission Group Plan Major Hydrogen Power Project for California,” www.bp.com/hydrogenpower, 2 pgs. |
| Biyngelsson, M. et al. (2005) “Feasibility Study of CO2 Removal From Pressurized Flue Gas in a Fully Fired Combined Cycle—The Sargas Project,” KTH—Royal Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Technology, 9 pgs. |
| Clark, Hal (2002) “Development of a Unique Gas Generator for a Non-Polluting Power Plant,” California Energy Commission Feasibility Analysis, P500-02-011F, 42 pgs. |
| Foy, Kirsten et al. (2005) “Comparison of Ion Transport Membranes” Fourth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration, DOE/NETL; 11 pgs. |
| Cho, J. H. et al. (2005) “Marrying LNG and Power Generation,” Energy Markets; 10, 8; ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry, 5 pgs. |
| Corti, A. et al. (1988) “Athabasca Mineable Oil Sands: The RTR/Gulf Extraction Process Theoretical Model of Bitumen Detachment,” 4th UNITAR/UNDP Int'l Conf. on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands Proceedings, v.5, paper No. 81, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 4 pgs. |
| Science Clarified (2012) “Cryogenics,” http://www.scienceclarified.com/Co-Di/Cryogenics.html; 6 pgs. |
| Defrate, L. A. et al. (1959) “Optimum Design of Ejector Using Digital Computers” Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser., 55 ( 21), 12 pgs. |
| Ditaranto, M. et al. (2006) “Combustion Instabilities in Sudden Expansion Oxy-Fuel Flames,” ScienceDirect, Combustion and Flame, v.146, 20 pgs. |
| Elwell, L. C. et al. (2005) “Technical Overview of Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies for Coal-Fired Power Plants,” MPR Associates, Inc., www.mpr.com/uploads/news/co2-capture-coal-fired.pdf, 15 pgs. |
| Eriksson, Sara. (2005) “Development of Methane Oxidation Catalysts for Different Gas Turbine Combustor Concepts.” KTH—The Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Chemical Technology, Licentiate Thesis, Stockholm Sweden; 45 pgs. |
| Ertesvag, I. S. et al. (2005) “Exergy Analysis of a Gas-Turbine Combined-Cycle Power Plant With Precombustion CO2 Capture,” Elsevier, 35 pgs. |
| ElKady, Ahmed. M. et al. (2009) “Application of Exhaust Gas Recirculation in a DLN F-Class Combustion System for Postcombustion Carbon Capture,” ASME J. Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 131, 6 pgs. |
| Evulet, Andrei T. et al. (2009) “On the Performance and Operability of GE's Dry Low NOx Combustors utilizing Exhaust Gas Recirculation for Post-Combustion Carbon Capture” Energy Procedia I, 8 pgs. |
| Caldwell Energy Company (2011) “Wet Compression”; IGTI 2011—CTIC Wet Compression, http://www.turbineinletcooling.org/resources/papers/CTIC_WetCompression_Shepherd_ASMETurboExpo2011.pdf , 22 pgs. |
| Luby, P. et al. (2003) “Zero Carbon Power Generation: IGCC as the Premium Option,” Powergen International, 19 pgs. |
| MacAdam, S. et al. (2007) “Coal-Based Oxy-Fuel System Evaluation and Combustor Development,” Clean Energy Systems, Inc.; presented at the 2nd International Freiberg Conference on IGCC & XtL Technologies, 6 pgs. |
| Morehead, H. (2007) “Siemens Global Gasification and IGCC Update,” Siemens, Coal-Gen, 17 pgs. |
| Nanda, R. et al. (2007) “Utilizing Air Based Technologies as Heat Source for LNG Vaporization,” presented at the 86th Annual convention of the Gas Processors of America (GPA 2007), , San Antonio, TX; 13 pgs. |
| Reeves, S. R. (2001) “Geological Sequestration of CO2 in Deep, Unmineable Coalbeds: An Integrated Research and Commercial-Scale Field Demonstration Project,” SPE 71749; presented at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 10 pgs. |
| Reeves, S. R. (2003) “Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery,” Society of Petroleum Engineers 101466-DL; SPE Distinguished Lecture Series, 8 pgs. |
| Richards, Geo A., et al (2001) “Advanced Steam Generators,” National Energy Technology Lab., Pittsburgh, PA; and Morgantown. WV; NASA Glean Research Center (US), 7 pgs. |
| Rosetta, M. J. et al. (2006) “Integrating Ambient Air Vaporization Technology with Waste Heat Recovery—A Fresh Approach to LNG Vaporization,” presented at the 85th annual convention of the Gas Processors of America (GPA 2006), Grapevine, Texas, 22 pgs. |
| Snarheim, D. et al. (2006) “Control Design for a Gas Turbine Cycle With CO2 Capture Capabilities,” Modeling, Identification and Control, vol. 00; presented at the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 10 pgs. |
| Ulfsnes, R. E. et al. (2003) “Investigation of Physical Properties for CO2/H2O Mixtures for use in Semi-Closed O2/CO2 Gas Turbine Cycle With CO2-Capture,” Department of Energy and Process Eng., Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology, 9 pgs. |
| van Hemert, P. et al. (2006) “Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide and a Hydrogen-Carbon Dioxide Mixture,” Intn'l Coalbed Methane Symposium (Tuscaloosa, AL) Paper 0615, 9 pgs. |
| Zhu, J. et al. (2002) “Recovery of Coalbed Methane by Gas Injection,” Society of Petroleum Engineers 75255; presented at the 2002 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 15 pgs. |
| Final Rejection for JP Application No. 2016-548624 dated Jul. 29, 2019, pp. 1-2. |
| Ciulia, Vincent. (2001) “Auto Repair. How the Engine Works,” http://autorepair.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/aa060500a.htm, 1 page, (last viewed Aug. 17, 2012). |
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for related PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/073048 dated Mar. 24, 2015, pp. 1-10. |
| Decision to Grant, Russian Application No. 2016134897/6(054504), dated Nov. 27, 2018. |
| Notification of Reason for Rejection, Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-548624, dated Nov. 29, 2018. |
| Notice of Acceptance for Patent Application, Australian Patent Application No. 2014379485, dated Jan. 7, 2019. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190013756 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61932178 | Jan 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14585950 | Dec 2014 | US |
| Child | 16121163 | US |
