The present invention is related generally to machine-tools, and, more particularly, to aligning a machine-tool with a spindle.
In a typical small-scale drill press, a drill bit is held in a chuck or collet. The bit is then rotated and brought to bear against a workpiece. A typical lathe is similar, but it rotates the workpiece instead of the machine-tool. In these machines, keeping the machine-tool aligned with the workpiece is important but fairly straightforward.
The situation changes with the more complex machines used in industry. Often, these machines include a rotating turret disk that holds a number of toolholders. Each toolholder is available to hold one machine-tool. In operation, the turret disk is rotated so that a toolholder holding a machine-tool appropriate for the next machining step is moved into place. The machine-tool is then brought to bear on a workpiece held by a rotating spindle. These multiple-toolholder machines are very useful because they allow an operator, whether a human or a computer, to rapidly switch from one machine-tool to another without having to remove one machine-tool and then insert another. However, the movement of the toolholders into position and then out again has implications for alignment.
Ideally, once a machine-tool held in a toolholder is properly aligned with the axis of rotation of the spindle that holds the workpiece, this machine-tool can be moved away and back again without affecting the alignment. Reality intervenes, however, and the pressures and vibrations of the working machine, and wear on the machine-tool itself, gradually cause the machine-tool to work out of alignment. This is a well known problem, and for it there exist well known fixes. The primary fix involves expert aligners who come out and fix the alignment of the toolholders. As a job requiring great expertise, this is an expensive process. During the alignment, the multiple-toolholder machine may be out of operation for a significant amount of time. After all that, the machine-tools eventually go out of alignment again, and the expensive and time-consuming process must be repeated.
In view of the foregoing, the present invention provides an alignment tool and a method for aligning a machine-tool with a spindle. The body of the alignment tool fits into a turret block. The body is attached to a head of the alignment tool. The head holds the actual machine-tool (by means of, for example, a self-centering collet). During the alignment process, the head and body are allowed to move relative to one another in two dimensions perpendicular to the axis of the spindle. Once the axis of the machine-tool is aligned with the axis of the spindle, the head and body are tightly fastened together to preserve the alignment.
In some embodiments, the head can accommodate machine-tools of various sizes. To further increase the usable range of the alignment tool beyond what one head can accommodate, multiple heads of various sizes can be provided that all work with a given body.
In a preferred method for aligning the alignment tool, a workpiece is inserted into a spindle. The workpiece is spun, and a machine-tool cuts a taper in it. This step ensures that the axis of rotation of the taper matches the axis of rotation of the spindle. Without removing the now tapered workpiece, an “empty” alignment tool (that is, one not holding a machine-tool) is indexed into position opposite the tapered workpiece. The connection between the alignment tool's head and body is loosened. The alignment tool is then brought to bear against the tapered workpiece. The taper causes the axis of the head of the alignment tool to match the axis of the taper. The alignment tool's head and body are then tightly connected. The axis of the head of the alignment tool, and thus the axis of any machine-tool held by the head, now matches the axis of the tapered workpiece and, thus, matches the axis of rotation of the spindle. With the alignment achieved, the tapered workpiece can be removed.
While the appended claims set forth the features of the present invention with particularity, the invention, together with its objects and advantages, may be best understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
Turning to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, the present invention is illustrated as being implemented in a suitable environment. The following description is based on embodiments of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the invention with regard to alternative embodiments that are not explicitly described herein.
The piece of the alignment tool 100 held by the turret block 102 is called the “body” 104. Attachable to the body 104 is a head 106. In
In the embodiment of
The entire alignment tool 100 from the body 104 to the collet nut 112 can replace a traditional toolholder without having to modify either the turret block 102 or the machine-tools used with it.
Sectioning the body 104 along line A-A of
The threads 402 on the outside surface of the head 106 accept the collet nut 112. The cavity 404 accepts a machine-tool which is held in place by the collet 110. The angle 406 at the entrance to the cavity 404 may be useful during the alignment process as discussed below. In some embodiments, a value of about 8 degrees works well for this angle 406.
The cross-section in
Leaving the newly tapered workpiece in place in the spindle, a body 104 of an alignment tool 100, 200 is attached to a machine-tool turret 102 in step 602. (It is quite likely that step 602 is performed before step 600. Usually, the alignment tool 100, 200 used throughout the method of
In step 604, a head 106, 202 is loosely attached to the body 104 of the alignment tool 100, 200. The attachment may be made by the machine screws 108 shown in
In step 606, the alignment tool 100, 200 is brought to bear against the tapered workpiece, still held in the spindle, created in step 600. Note that the spindle is not rotating at this time. Note also that the alignment tool 100, 200 is not holding a machine-tool. Because of this, the cavity in the middle of the alignment tool 100, 200 which would normally hold a machine-tool can be placed against the tapered workpiece. In the embodiment of
In step 608, without removing the alignment tool 100, 200 from its position in contact with the tapered workpiece, the machine screws 108 are tightened to hold the head 106, 202 of the alignment tool 100, 200 firmly against the body 104. The alignment tool 100, 200, still firmly mounted in the turret 102, can then be moved away from the tapered workpiece.
The tapered workpiece is no longer needed and can be removed. The method ends in step 610 when a machine-tool is placed in the alignment tool 100, 200 and tightened. Note what has been achieved by the straightforward method of
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the present invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the embodiments described herein with respect to the drawing figures are meant to be illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Those of skill in the art will recognize that some implementation details, such as the range of sizes of the alignment tools, are determined by specific situations. Therefore, the invention as described herein contemplates all such embodiments as may come within the scope of the following claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1317008 | Dohner et al. | Sep 1919 | A |
2202117 | Müller | May 1940 | A |
2286477 | Falls | Jun 1942 | A |
2368736 | Wyrick | Feb 1945 | A |
2392809 | Cote | Jan 1946 | A |
2411621 | Grubbs | Nov 1946 | A |
2505335 | Miller | Apr 1950 | A |
2534333 | Wyrick | Dec 1950 | A |
2814885 | Johns | Dec 1957 | A |
3264941 | Miraglia | Aug 1966 | A |
3359008 | Stimmerman | Dec 1967 | A |
3688614 | Hardin | Sep 1972 | A |
3813971 | Lemanski | Jun 1974 | A |
3835666 | Hoffman | Sep 1974 | A |
4048882 | Watkins | Sep 1977 | A |
RE29612 | Fullerton | Apr 1978 | E |
4183270 | Castagne | Jan 1980 | A |
4464958 | Luks | Aug 1984 | A |
4626151 | Dietrich | Dec 1986 | A |
4656708 | Smith et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4722645 | Regan | Feb 1988 | A |
5022131 | Hobbs | Jun 1991 | A |
5048384 | Carlen | Sep 1991 | A |
5739654 | Doran et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5887500 | Natale | Mar 1999 | A |
6003415 | Turner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6134998 | Loeffler et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6311591 | Grossmann | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6393713 | French | May 2002 | B1 |
6401348 | Cavanaugh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6640404 | Sheehan et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
20020032107 | Shehan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030029287 | Judas | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030177877 | Nguyen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080078095 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |