Patent Grant
8589161
The invention relates to an integrated voice services environment in which a plurality of devices can provide various voice services by cooperatively processing free form, multi-modal, natural language inputs, thereby facilitating conversational interactions between a user and one or more of the devices in the integrated environment.
As technology has progressed in recent years, consumer electronic devices have emerged to become nearly ubiquitous in the everyday lives of many people. To meet the increasing demand that has resulted from growth in the functionality and mobility of mobile phones, navigation devices, embedded devices, and other such devices, a wealth of features and functions are often provided therein in addition to core applications. Greater functionality also introduces the trade-offs, however, including learning curves that often inhibit users from fully exploiting all of the capabilities of their electronic devices. For example, many existing electronic devices include complex human to machine interfaces that may not be particularly user-friendly, which inhibits mass-market adoption for many technologies. Moreover, cumbersome interfaces often result in otherwise desirable features being buried (e.g., within menus that may be tedious to navigate), which has the tendency of causing many users to not use, or even know about, the potential capabilities of their devices.
As such, the increased functionality provided by many electronic devices often tends to be wasted, as market research suggests that many users only use only a fraction of the features or applications available on a given device. Moreover, in a society where wireless networking and broadband access are increasingly prevalent, consumers tend to naturally desire seamless mobile capabilities from their electronic devices. Thus, as consumer demand intensifies for simpler mechanisms to interact with electronic devices, cumbersome interfaces that prevent quick and focused interaction can become an important concern. Accordingly, the ever-growing demand for mechanisms to use technology in intuitive ways remains largely unfulfilled.
One approach towards simplifying human to machine interactions in electronic devices includes the use of voice recognition software, which can enable users to exploit features that could otherwise be unfamiliar, unknown, or difficult to use. For example, a recent survey conducted by the Navteq Corporation, which provides data used in a variety of applications such as automotive navigation and web-based applications, demonstrates that voice recognition often ranks among the features most desired by consumers of electronic devices. Even so, existing voice user interfaces, when they actually work, still tend to require significant learning on the part of the user.
For example, many existing voice user interfaces only support requests formulated according to specific command-and-control sequences or syntaxes. Furthermore, many existing voice user interfaces cause user frustration or dissatisfaction because of inaccurate speech recognition. Similarly, by forcing a user to provide pre-established commands or keywords to communicate requests in ways that a system can understand, existing voice user interfaces do not effectively engage the user in a productive, cooperative dialogue to resolve requests and advance a conversation towards a mutually satisfactory goal (e.g., when users may be uncertain of particular needs, available information, or device capabilities, among other things). As such, existing voice user interfaces tend to suffer from various drawbacks, including significant limitations on engaging users in a dialogue in a cooperative and conversational manner.
Additionally, many existing voice user interfaces fall short in utilizing information distributed across various different domains or devices in order to resolve natural language voice-based inputs. Thus, existing voice user interfaces suffer from being constrained to a finite set of applications for which they have been designed, or to devices on which they reside. Although technological advancement has resulted in users often having several devices to suit their various needs, existing voice user interfaces do not adequately free users from device constraints. For example, users may be interested in services associated with different applications and devices, but existing voice user interfaces tend to restrict users from accessing the applications and devices as they see fit. Moreover, users typically can only practicably carry a finite number of devices at any given time, yet content or services associated with users' other devices that currently being used may be desired in various circumstances. Accordingly, although users tend to have varying needs, where content or services associated with different devices may be desired in various contexts or environments, existing voice technologies tend to fall short in providing an integrated environment in which users can request content or services associated with virtually any device or network. As such, constraints on information availability and device interaction mechanisms in existing voice services environments tend to prevent users from experiencing technology in an intuitive, natural, and efficient way.
Existing systems suffer from these and other problems.
According to various aspects of the invention, a system and method for an integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice services environment may include a plurality of voice-enabled devices each having intent determination capabilities for processing multi-modal natural language inputs in addition to knowledge of the intent determination capabilities of other devices in the environment. Further, the environment may be arranged in a centralized manner, a distributed peer-to-peer manner, or various combinations thereof. As such, the various devices may cooperate to determine intent of multi-modal natural language inputs, and commands, queries, or other requests may be routed to one or more of the devices best suited to take action in response thereto.
According to various aspects of the invention, the integrated natural language voice services environment arranged in the centralized manner includes an input device that receives a multi-modal natural language input, a central device communicatively coupled to the input device, and one or more secondary devices communicatively coupled to the central device. Each of the input device, the central device, and the one or more secondary devices may have intent determination capabilities for processing multi-modal natural language inputs. As such, an intent of a given multi-modal natural language input may be determined in the centralized manner by communicating the multi-modal natural language input from the input device to the central device. Thereafter, the central device may aggregate the intent determination capabilities of the input device and the one or more secondary devices and determine an intent of the multi-modal natural language input using the aggregated intent determination capabilities. The input device may then receive the determined intent from the central device and invoke at least one action at one or more of the input device, the central device, or the secondary devices based on the determined intent.
According to various aspects of the invention, the integrated natural language voice services environment arranged in the distributed manner includes an input device that receives a multi-modal natural language input, a central device communicatively coupled to the input device and one or more secondary devices communicatively coupled to the input device, wherein each of the input device and the one or more secondary devices may have intent determination capabilities for processing multi-modal natural language inputs, as in the centralized implementation. However, the distributed implementation may be distinct from the centralized implementation in that a preliminary intent of the multi-modal natural language input may be determined at the input device using local intent determination capabilities. The multi-modal natural language input may then be communicated to one or more of the secondary devices (e.g., when a confidence level of the intent determination at the input device falls below a given threshold). In such cases, each of the secondary devices determine an intent of the multi-modal natural language input using local intent determination capabilities. The input device collates the preliminary intent determination and the intent determinations of the secondary devices, and may arbitrate among the collated intent determinations to determine an actionable intent of the multi-modal natural input.
According to various aspects of the invention, the integrated natural language voice services environment arranged in a manner that dynamically selects between a centralized model and a distributed model. For example, the environment includes an input device that receives a multi-modal natural language input one or more secondary devices communicatively coupled to the input device, each of which have intent determination capabilities for processing multi-modal natural language inputs. A constellation model may be accessible to each of the input device and the one or more secondary devices, wherein the constellation model describes the intent determination capabilities of the input device and the one or more secondary devices. The multi-modal natural language input can be routed for processing at one or more of the input device or the secondary devices to determine an intent thereof based on the intent determination capabilities described in the constellation model. For example, when the constellation model arranges the input device and the secondary devices in the centralized manner, one of the secondary devices may be designated the central device and the natural language input may be processed as described above. However, when the multi-modal natural language cannot be communicated to the central device, the constellation model may be dynamically rearranged in the distributed manner, whereby the input device and the secondary devices share knowledge relating to respective local intent determination capabilities and operate as cooperative nodes to determine the intent of the multi-modal natural language input using the shared knowledge relating to local intent determination capabilities.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent based on the following drawings and detailed description.
According to various aspects of the invention,
For example, the natural language processing components may support free form natural language utterances to liberate the user from restrictions relating to how commands, queries, or other requests should be formulated. Rather, the user may employ any manner of speaking that feels natural in order to request content or services available through the device 100 (e.g., content or services relating to telematics, communications, media, messaging, navigation, marketing, information retrieval, etc.). For instance, in various implementations, the device 100 may process natural language utterances utilizing techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/452,147, entitled “Systems and Methods for Responding to Natural Language Speech Utterance,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,398,209 on Jul. 8, 2008, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/618,633, entitled “Mobile Systems and Methods for Responding to Natural Language Speech Utterance,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,693,720 on Apr. 6, 2010, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Moreover, because the device 100 may be deployed in an integrated multi-device environment, the user may further request content or services available through other devices deployed in the environment. In particular, the integrated voice services environment may include a plurality of multi-modal devices, each of which include natural language components generally similar to those illustrated in
According to various aspects of the invention, the electronic device 100 may include an input mechanism 105 that can receive multi-modal natural language inputs, which include at least an utterance spoken by the user. As will be apparent, the input mechanism 105 may include any appropriate device or combination of devices capable of receiving a spoken input (e.g., a directional microphone, an array of microphones, or any other device that can generate encoded speech). Further, in various implementations, the input mechanism 105 can be configured to maximize fidelity of encoded speech, for example, by maximizing gain in a direction of the user, cancelling echoes, nulling point noise sources, performing variable rate sampling, or filtering environmental noise (e.g., background conversations). As such, the input mechanism 105 may generate encoded speech in a manner that can tolerate noise or other factors that could otherwise interfere with accurate interpretation of the utterance.
Furthermore, in various implementations, the input mechanism 105 may include various other input modalities (i.e., the input mechanism 105 may be arranged in a multi-modal environment), in that non-voice inputs can be correlated and/or processed in connection with one or more previous, contemporaneous, or subsequent multi-modal natural language inputs. For example, the input mechanism 105 may be coupled to a touch-screen interface, a stylus and tablet interface, a keypad or keyboard, or any other suitable input mechanism, as will be apparent. As a result, an amount of information potentially available when processing the multi-modal inputs may be maximized, as the user can clarify utterances or otherwise provide additional information in a given multi-modal natural language input using various input modalities. For instance, in an exemplary illustration, the user could touch a stylus or other pointing device to a portion of a touch-screen interface of the device 100, while also providing an utterance relating to the touched portion of the interface (e.g., “Show me restaurants around here”). In this example, the natural language utterance may be correlated with the input received via the touch-screen interface, resulting in “around here” being interpreted in relation to the touched portion of the interface (e.g., as opposed to the user's current location or some other meaning).
According to various aspects of the invention, the device 100 may include an Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 that generates one or more preliminary interpretations of the encoded speech, which may be received from the input mechanism 105. For example, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may recognize syllables, words, or phrases contained in an utterance using one or more dynamically adaptable recognition grammars. The dynamic recognition grammars may be used to recognize a stream of phonemes through phonetic dictation based on one or more acoustic models. Furthermore, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/197,504, entitled “Systems and Methods for Responding to Natural Language Speech Utterance,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,640,160 on Dec. 29, 2009, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may be capable of multi-pass analysis, where a primary speech recognition engine may generate a primary interpretation of an utterance (e.g., using a large list dictation grammar) and request secondary transcription from one or more secondary speech recognition engines (e.g., using a virtual dictation grammar having decoy words for out-of-vocabulary words).
Thus, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may generate preliminary interpretations of an utterance in various ways, including exclusive use of a dictation grammar or virtual dictation grammar, or use of various combinations thereof (e.g., when the device 100 supports multi-pass analysis). In any event, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may provide out-of-vocabulary capabilities and may tolerate portions of a speech signal being dropped, the user misspeaking, or other variables that may occur in natural language speech (e.g., stops and starts, stutters, etc.). Furthermore, the recognition grammars employed by the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may include vocabularies, dictionaries, syllables, words, phrases, or other information optimized according to various contextual or application-specific domains (e.g., navigation, music, movies, weather, shopping, news, languages, temporal or geographic proximities, or other suitable domains). Moreover, environmental knowledge (e.g., peer-to-peer affinities, capabilities of devices in the environment, etc.), historical knowledge (e.g., frequent requests, prior context, etc.), or other types of knowledge can be used to continually optimize the information contained in the recognition grammars on a dynamic basis.
For example, information contained in the recognition grammars may be dynamically optimized to improve a likelihood of a given utterance being recognized accurately (e.g., following an incorrect interpretation of a word, the incorrect interpretation may be removed from the grammar to reduce a likelihood of the incorrect interpretation being repeated). Accordingly, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may use a number of techniques to generate preliminary interpretations of natural language utterances, including those described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/513,269, entitled “Dynamic Speech Sharpening,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,634,409 on Dec. 15, 2009, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Furthermore, the techniques used by the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 associated with the device 100 may be considered in defining intent determination capabilities of the device 100, and such capabilities may be shared with other devices in the environment to enable convergence of speech recognition throughout the environment (e.g., because various devices may employ distinct speech recognition techniques or have distinct grammars or vocabularies, the devices may share vocabulary translation mechanisms to enhance system-wide recognition).
According to various aspects of the invention, the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 may provide one or more preliminary interpretations of a multi-modal input, including an utterance contained therein, to a conversational language processor 120. The conversational language processor 120 may include various components that collectively operate to model everyday human-to-human conversations in order to engage in cooperative conversations with the user to resolve requests based on the user's intent. For example, the conversational language processor 120 may include, among other things, an intent determination engine 130a, a constellation model 130b, one or more domain agents 130c, a context tracking engine 130d, a misrecognition engine 130e, and a voice search engine 130f. Furthermore, the conversational language processor 120 may be coupled to one or more data repositories 160 and applications associated with one or more domains. Thus, the intent determination capabilities of the device 100 may be defined based on the data and processing capabilities of the Automatic Speech Recognizer 110 and the conversational language processor 120.
More particularly, the intent determination engine 130a may establish meaning for a given multi-modal natural language input based on a consideration of the intent determination capabilities of the device 100 as well as the intent determination capabilities of other devices in the integrated voice services environment. For example, the intent determination capabilities of the device 100 may be defined as a function of processing resources, storage for grammars, context, agents, or other data, and content or services associated with the device 100 (e.g., a media device with a small amount of memory may have a smaller list of recognizable songs than a device with a large amount of memory). Thus, the intent determination engine 130a may determine whether to process a given input locally (e.g., when the device 100 has intent determination capabilities that suggest favorable conditions for recognition), or whether to route information associated with the input to other devices, which may assist in determining the intent of the input.
As such, to determine which device or combination of devices should process an input, the intent determination engine 130a may evaluate the constellation model 130b, which provides a model of the intent determination capabilities for each of the devices in the integrated voice services environment. For instance, the constellation model 130b may contain, among other things, knowledge of processing and storage resources available to each of the devices in the environment, as well as the nature and scope of domain agents, context, content, services, and other information available to each of the devices in the environment. As such, using the constellation model 130b, the intent determination engine 130a may be able to determine whether any of the other devices have intent determination capabilities that can be invoked to augment or otherwise enhance the intent determination capabilities of the device 100 (e.g., by routing information associated with a multi-modal natural language input to the device or devices that appear best suited to analyze the information and therefore determine an intent of the input). Accordingly, the intent determination engine 130a may establish the meaning of a given utterance by utilizing the comprehensive constellation model 130b that describes capabilities within the device 100 and across the integrated environment. The intent determination engine 130a may therefore optimize processing of a given natural language input based on capabilities throughout the environment (e.g., utterances may be processed locally to the device 100, routed to a specific device based on information in the constellation model 130b, or flooded to all of the devices in the environment in which case an arbitration may occur to select a best guess at an intent determination).
Although the following discussion will generally focus on various techniques that can be used to determine the intent of multi-modal natural language inputs in the integrated multi-device environment, it will be apparent that the natural language processing capabilities of any one of the devices may extend beyond the specific discussion that has been provided herein. As such, in addition to the U.S. Patents and U.S. Patent Applications referenced above, further natural language processing capabilities that may be employed include those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/197,504, entitled “Systems and Methods for Responding to Natural Language Speech Utterance,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,640,160 on Dec. 29, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/200,164, entitled “System and Method of Supporting Adaptive Misrecognition in Conversational Speech,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,620,549 on Nov. 17, 2009, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/212,693, entitled “Mobile Systems and Methods of Supporting Natural Language Human-Machine Interactions,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,949,529 on May 24, 2011, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/580,926, entitled “System and Method for a Cooperative Conversational Voice User Interface,” filed Oct. 16, 2006, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/671,526, entitled “System and Method for Selecting and Presenting Advertisements Based on Natural Language Processing of Voice-Based Input,” which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,818,176 on Oct. 19, 2010, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/954,064, entitled “System and Method for Providing a Natural Language Voice User Interface in an Integrated Voice Navigation Services Environment,” filed Dec. 11, 2007, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
According to various aspects of the invention,
As illustrated in
In the centralized implementation illustrated in
Accordingly, as communication and processing capabilities permit, the central device 220 may be used as a recognizer of first or last resort. For example, because the central device 220 converges intent determination capabilities across the environment (e.g., by aggregating context, vocabularies, device capabilities, and other information from the devices 210a-n in the environment), inputs may be automatically routed to the central device 220 when used as a recognizer of first resort, or as a recognizer of last resort when local processing at the input device 210 cannot determine the intent of the input with a satisfactory level of confidence. However, it will also be apparent that in certain instances the input device 210 may be unable to make contact with the central device 220 for various reasons (e.g., a network connection may be unavailable, or a processing bottleneck at the central device 220 may cause communication delays). In such cases, the input device 210 that has initiated contact with the central device 220 may shift into decentralized processing (e.g., as described in reference to
Additionally, in the multi-device voice services environment, the central device 220 and the various other devices 210a-n may cooperate to create a converged model of capabilities throughout the environment. For example, as indicated above, in addition to having intent determination capabilities based on processing resources, memory resources, and device capabilities, each of the devices 210a-n and the central device 220 may include various other natural language processing components. The voice services environment may therefore operate in an integrated manner by maintaining not only a complete model of data, content, and services associated with the various devices 210a-n, but also of other natural language processing capabilities and dynamic states associated with the various devices 210a-n. As such, the various devices 210a-n may operate with a goal of converging capabilities, data, states, and other information across the device, either on one device (e.g., the central device 220) or distributed among the various devices 210a-n (e.g., as in the decentralized implementation to be described in
For example, as discussed above, each device 210 includes an Automatic Speech Recognizer, one or more dynamically adaptable recognition grammars, and vocabulary lists used to generate phonemic interpretations of natural language utterances. Moreover, each device 210 includes locally established context, which can range from information contained in a context stack, context and namespace variables, vocabulary translation mechanisms, short-term shared knowledge relating to a current dialogue or conversational interaction, long-term shared knowledge relating to a user's learned preferences over time, or other contextual information. Furthermore, each device 210 may have various services or applications associated therewith, and may perform various aspects of natural language processing locally. Thus, additional information to be converged throughout the environment may include partial or preliminary utterance recognitions, misrecognitions or ambiguous recognitions, inferencing capabilities, and overall device state information (e.g., songs playing in the environment, alarms set in the environment, etc.).
Thus, various data synchronization and referential integrity algorithms may be employed in concert by the various devices 210a-n and the central device 220 to provide a consistent worldview of the environment. For example, information may be described and transmitted throughout the environment for synchronization and convergence purposes using the Universal Plug and Play protocol designed for computer ancillary devices, although the environment can also operate in a peer-to-peer disconnected mode (e.g., when the central device 220 cannot be reached). However, in various implementations, the environment may also operate in a peer-to-peer mode regardless of the disconnected status, as illustrated in
In general, the algorithms for convergence in the environment can be executed at various intervals, although it may be desirable to limit data transmission so as to avoid processing bottlenecks. For example, because the convergence and synchronization techniques relate to natural language processing, in which any given utterance will typically be expressed over a course of several seconds, information relating to context and vocabulary need not be updated on a time frame of less than a few seconds. However, as communication capabilities permit, context and vocabulary could be updated more frequently to provide real-time recognition or the appearance of real-time recognition. In another implementation, the convergence and synchronization may be permitted to run until completion (e.g., when no requests are currently pending), or the convergence and synchronization may be suspended or terminated when a predetermined time or resource consumption limit has been reached (e.g., when the convergence relates to a pending request, an intent determination having a highest confidence level at the time of cut-off may be used).
By establishing a consistent view of capabilities, data, states, and other information throughout the environment, an input device 210 may cooperate with the central device 220 and one or more secondary devices (i.e., one or more of devices 210a-n, other than the input device) in processing any given multi-modal natural language input. Furthermore, by providing each device 210 and the central device 220 with a constellation model that describes a synchronized state of the environment, the environment may be tolerant of failure by one or more of the devices 210a-n, or of the central device 220. For example, if the input device 210 cannot communicate with the central device 220 (e.g., because of a server crash), the input device 210 may enter a disconnected peer-to-peer mode, whereby capabilities can be exchanged with one or more devices 210a-n with which communications remain available. To that end, when a device 210 establishes new information relating to vocabulary, context, misrecognitions, agent adaptation, intent determination capabilities, inferencing capabilities, or otherwise, the device 210 may transmit the information to the central device 220 for convergence purposes, as discussed above, in addition to consulting the constellation model to determine whether the information should be transmitted to one or more of the other devices 210a-n.
For example, suppose the environment includes a voice-enabled mobile phone that has nominal functionality relating to playing music or other media, and which further has a limited amount of local storage space, while the environment further includes a voice-enabled home media system that includes a mass storage medium that provides dedicated media functionality. If the mobile phone were to establish new vocabulary, context, or other information relating to a song (e.g., a user downloads the song or a ringtone to the mobile phone while on the road), the mobile phone may transmit the newly established information to the home media system in addition to the central device 220. As such, by having a model of all of the devices 210a-n in the environment and transmitting new information to the devices where it will most likely be useful, the various devices may handle disconnected modes of operation when the central device 220 may be unavailable for any reason, while resources may be allocated efficiently throughout the environment.
Thus, based on the foregoing discussion, it will be apparent that a centralized implementation of an integrated multi-device voice services environment may generally include a central device 220 operable to aggregate or converge knowledge relating to content, services, capabilities, and other information associated with various voice-enabled devices 210a-n deployed within the environment. In such centralized implementations, the central device 220 may be invoked as a recognizer of first or last resort, as will be described in greater detail with reference to
According to various aspects of the invention,
As illustrated in
The input device may also be configured to coordinate synchronization of intent determination capabilities, shared knowledge, and other information with the central device and the secondary devices in the environment prior to receiving the input at operation 310. For example, when the input device installs a domain agent, the installed domain agent may bootstrap context variables, semantics, namespace variables, criteria values, and other context related to that agent from other devices in the system. Similarly, misrecognitions may be received from the central device and the secondary devices in order to enable correction of agents that use information relevant to the received misrecognitions, and vocabularies and associated translation mechanisms may be synchronized among the devices to account for potential variations between the Automatic Speech Recognizers used by the various devices (e.g., each device in the environment cannot be guaranteed to use the same Automatic Speech Recognizer or recognition grammars, necessitating vocabulary and translation mechanisms to be shared among the devices that share intent determination capabilities).
Upon establishing and synchronizing natural language processing capabilities and subsequently receiving a multi-modal natural language input in operation 310, the input device may determine whether the environment has been set up to automatically transmit the input to the central device in a decisional operation 320. In such a case, processing proceeds to an operation 360 for transmitting the input to the central device, which may then process the input according to techniques to be described in relation to
Subsequently, in an operation 340, an intent of the multi-modal natural language input may be determined at the input device using local natural language processing capabilities and resources. For example, any non-voice input modalities included in the input may be merged with the utterance transcription and a conversational language processor associated with the input device may utilize local information relating to context, domain knowledge, shared knowledge, context variables, criteria values, or other information useful in natural language processing. As such, the input device may attempt to determine a best guess as to an intent of the user that provided the input, such as identifying a conversation type (e.g., query, didactic, or exploratory) or request that may be contained in the input (e.g., a command or query relating to one or more domain agents or application domains).
The intent determination of the input device may be assigned a confidence level (e.g., a device having an Automatic Speech Recognizer that implements multi-pass analysis may assign comparatively higher confidence levels to utterance transcriptions created thereby, which may result in a higher confidence level for the intent determination). The confidence level may be assigned based on various factors, as described in the above-referenced U.S. Patents and U.S. Patent Applications. As such, a decisional operation 350 may include determining whether the intent determination of the input device meets an acceptable level of confidence. When the intent determination meets the acceptable level confidence, processing may proceed directly to an operation 380 where action may be taken in response thereto. For example, when the intent determination indicates that the user has requested certain information, one or more queries may be formulated to retrieve the information from appropriate information sources, which may include one or more of the other devices. In another example, when the intent determination indicates that the user has requested a given command (e.g., to control a specific device), the command may be routed to the appropriate device for execution.
Thus, in cases where the input device can determine the intent of a natural language input without assistance from the central device or the secondary devices, communications and processing resources may be conserved by taking immediate action as may be appropriate. On the other hand, when the intent determination of the input device does not meet the acceptable level of confidence, decisional operation 350 may result in the input device requesting assistance from the central device in operation 360. In such a case, the multi-modal natural language input may be communicated to the central device in its entirety, whereby the central device processes the input according to techniques described in
Referring to
As such, once the central device has attempted to determine the intent of the natural language input, a determination may be made in an operation 440 as to whether one or more secondary devices (i.e., other devices in the constellation besides the input device) may also be capable of intent determination in the identified domain or domains. When no such secondary devices can be identified, decisional operation 440 may branch directly to an operation 480 to send to the input device the determined intent and any commands, queries, or other requests identified from the determined intent.
On the other hand, when one or more secondary devices in the environment have intent determination capabilities in the identified domain or domains, the natural language input may be sent to such secondary devices in an operation 450. The secondary devices may then determine an intent as illustrated in
Returning to
In any event, when the collating operation 460 has completed, a subsequent operation 470 may include the central device arbitrating among the intent determination responses received from one or more of the secondary devices previously invoked in operation 450. For example, each of the invoked secondary devices that generate an intent determination may also assign a confidence level to that intent determination, and the central device may consider the confidence levels in arbitrating among the responses. Moreover, the central device may associate other criteria with the secondary devices or the intent determinations received from the secondary devices to further enhance a likelihood that the best intent determination will be used. For example, various ones of the secondary devices may only be invoked for partial recognition in distinct domains, and the central device may aggregate and arbitrate the partial recognitions to create a complete transcription. In another example, a plurality of secondary devices may be invoked to perform overlapping intent determination, and the central device may consider capabilities of the secondary devices to weigh the respective confidence levels (e.g., when one of two otherwise identical secondary devices employs multi-pass speech recognition analysis, the secondary device employing the multi-pass speech recognition analysis may be weighed as having a higher likelihood of success). It will be apparent that the central device may be configured to arbitrate and select one intent determination from among all of the intent hypotheses, which may include the intent determination hypothesis generated by the central device in operation 430. Upon selecting the best intent determination hypothesis, the central device may then provide that intent determination to the input device in operation 480, as well as any commands, queries, or other requests that may be relevant thereto. The input device may then take appropriate action as described above in relation to
According to various aspects of the invention,
Generally speaking, the plurality of voice-enabled devices 610a—may be coupled to one another by a voice services interface 630, which may include any suitable real or virtual interface (e.g., a common message bus or network interface, a service-oriented abstraction layer, etc.). The various devices 610a-n may therefore operate as cooperative nodes in determining intent for multi-modal natural language utterances received by any one of the devices 610. Furthermore, the devices 610a-n may share knowledge of vocabularies, context, capabilities, and other information, while certain forms of data may be synchronized to ensure consistent processing among the devices 610a-n. For example, because natural language processing components used in the devices 610a-n may vary (e.g., different recognition grammars or speech recognition techniques may exist), vocabulary translation mechanisms, misrecognitions, context variables, criteria values, criteria handlers, and other such information used in the intent determination process should be synchronized to the extent that communication capabilities permit.
By sharing intent determination capabilities, device capabilities, inferencing capabilities, domain knowledge, and other information, decisions as to routing an utterance to a specific one of the devices 610a-n may be made locally (e.g., at an input device), collaboratively (e.g., a device having particular capabilities relevant to the utterance may communicate a request to process the utterance), or various combinations thereof (e.g., the input device may consider routing to secondary devices only when an intent of the utterance cannot be determined). Similarly, partial recognition performed at one or more of the devices 610a-n may be used to determine routing strategies for further intent determination of the utterance. For example, an utterance that contains a plurality of requests relating to a plurality of different domains may be received at an input device that can only determine intent in one of the domains. In this example, the input device may perform partial recognition for the domain associated with the input device, and the partial recognition may also identify the other domains relevant to the utterance for which the input device does not have sufficient recognition information. Thus, the partial recognition performed by the input device may result in identification of other potentially relevant domains and a strategy may be formulated to route the utterance to other devices in the environment that include recognition information for those domains.
As a result, multi-modal natural language inputs, including natural language utterances, may be routed among the various devices 610a-n in order to perform intent determination in a distributed manner. However, as the capabilities and knowledge held by any one of the devices 610a-n may vary, each of the devices 610a-n may be associated with a reliability factor for intent determinations generated by the respective devices 610a-n. As such, to ensure that final intent determinations can be relied upon with a sufficient level of confidence, knowledge may be distributed among the devices 610a-n to ensure that reliability metrics for intent determinations provided by each of the devices 610a-n are commensurable throughout the environment. For example, additional knowledge may be provided to a device having a low intent determination reliability, even when such knowledge results in redundancy in the environment, to ensure commensurate reliability of intent determination environment-wide.
Therefore, in distributed implementations of the integrated voice services environment, utterances may be processed in various ways, which may depend on circumstances at a given time (e.g., system states, system or user preferences, etc.). For example, an utterance may be processed locally at an input device and only routed to secondary devices when an intent determination confidence level falls below a given threshold. In another example, utterances may be routed to a specific device based on the modeling of knowledge and capabilities discussed above. In yet another example, utterances may be flooded among all of the devices in the environment, and arbitration may occur whereby intent determinations may be collated and arbitrated to determine a best guess at intent determination.
Thus, utterances may be processed in various ways, including through local techniques, centralized techniques, distributed techniques, and various combinations thereof. Although many variations will be apparent,
Thereafter, the input device may invoke intent determination capabilities of one or more secondary devices in an operation 740. More particularly, the input device may provide information associated with the multi-modal natural language input to one or more of the secondary devices, which may utilize local intent determination capabilities to attempt to determine intent of the input using techniques as described in relation to
Furthermore, in addition to the exemplary implementations described above, various implementations may include a continuous listening mode of operation where a plurality of devices may continuously listen for multi-modal voice-based inputs. In the continuous listening mode, each of the devices in the environment may be triggered to accept a multi-modal input when one or more predetermined events occur. For example, the devices may each be associated with one or more attention words, such as “Phone, <multi-modal request>” for a mobile phone, or “Computer, <multi-modal request>” for a personal computer. When one or more of the devices in the environment recognize the associated attention word, keyword activation may result, where the associated devices trigger to accept the subsequent multi-modal request. Further, where a plurality of devices in a constellation may be listening, the constellation may use all available inputs to increase recognition rates.
Moreover, it will be apparent that the continuous listening mode may be applied in centralized voice service environments, distributed centralized voice service environments, or various combinations thereof. For example, when each device in the constellation has a different attention word, any given device that recognizes an attention word may consult a constellation model to determine a target device or functionality associated with the attention word. In another example, when a plurality of devices in the constellation share one or more attention words, the plurality of devices may coordinate with one another to synchronize information for processing the multi-modal input, such as a start time for an utterance contained therein.
Implementations of the invention may be made in hardware, firmware, software, or various combinations thereof. The invention may also be implemented as instructions stored on a machine-readable medium, which may be read and executed by one or more processors. A machine-readable medium may include various mechanisms for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computing device). For example, a machine-readable storage medium may include read only memory, random access memory, magnetic disk storage media, optical storage media, flash memory devices, and others, and a machine-readable transmission media may include forms of propagated signals, such as carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, and others. Further, firmware, software, routines, or instructions may be described in the above disclosure in terms of specific exemplary aspects and implementations of the invention, and performing certain actions. However, it will be apparent that such descriptions are merely for convenience and that such actions in fact result from computing devices, processors, controllers, or other devices executing the firmware, software, routines, or instructions.
Aspects and implementations may be described as including a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every aspect or implementation may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic has been described in connection with an aspect or implementation, it will be understood that such feature, structure, or characteristic may be included in connection with other aspects or implementations, whether or not explicitly described. Thus, various changes and modifications may be made to the preceding description without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention, and the specification and drawings should therefore be regarded as exemplary only, and the scope of the invention determined solely by the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4430669 | Cheung | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4821027 | Mallory et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4910784 | Doddington et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 5027406 | Roberts et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5155743 | Jacobs | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5164904 | Sumner | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5208748 | Flores et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5274560 | LaRue | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5357596 | Takebayashi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5377350 | Skinner | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5386556 | Hedin et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5424947 | Nagao et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5471318 | Ahuja et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5475733 | Eisdorfer et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5488652 | Bielby et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5499289 | Bruno et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5500920 | Kupiec | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5517560 | Greenspan | May 1996 | A |
| 5533108 | Harris et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5537436 | Bottoms et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539744 | Chu et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5557667 | Bruno et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559864 | Kennedy, Jr. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5563937 | Bruno et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5577165 | Takebayashi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5590039 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5608635 | Tamai | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5617407 | Bareis | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5633922 | August et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5652570 | Lepkofker | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5675629 | Raffel et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5696965 | Dedrick | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5708422 | Blonder et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5721938 | Stuckey | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5722084 | Chakrin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5740256 | Castello Da Costa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5742763 | Jones | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5748841 | Morin et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5748974 | Johnson | May 1998 | A |
| 5752052 | Richardson et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5754784 | Garland et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5761631 | Nasukawa | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774841 | Salazar et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774859 | Houser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5794050 | Dahlgren et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5794196 | Yegnanarayanan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797112 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799276 | Komissarchik et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5802510 | Jones | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5832221 | Jones | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839107 | Gupta et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5848396 | Gerace | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855000 | Waibel et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867817 | Catallo et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878385 | Bralich et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5878386 | Coughlin | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892813 | Morin et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5895464 | Bhandari et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5895466 | Goldberg et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897613 | Chan | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902347 | Backman et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5911120 | Jarett et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918222 | Fukui et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5926784 | Richardson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933822 | Braden-Harder et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5953393 | Culbreth et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960397 | Rahim | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960399 | Barclay et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960447 | Holt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5963894 | Richardson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5963940 | Liddy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5987404 | Della Pietra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991721 | Asano et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995119 | Cosatto et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995928 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6009382 | Martino et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014559 | Amin | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6018708 | Dahan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021384 | Gorin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028514 | Lemelson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6035267 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044347 | Abella et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6049602 | Foladare et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049607 | Marash et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6058187 | Chen | May 2000 | A |
| 6067513 | Ishimitsu | May 2000 | A |
| 6076059 | Glickman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078886 | Dragosh et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6081774 | De Hita et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6085186 | Christianson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6101241 | Boyce et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108631 | Ruhl | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6119087 | Kuhn et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6122613 | Baker | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6134235 | Goldman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144667 | Doshi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6144938 | Surace et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154526 | Dahlke et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6160883 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6167377 | Gillick et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6173266 | Marx et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6173279 | Levin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6175858 | Bulfer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185535 | Hedin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6188982 | Chiang | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192110 | Abella et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6192338 | Haszto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195634 | Dudemaine et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6195651 | Handel et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6199043 | Happ | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208964 | Sabourin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208972 | Grant et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6219346 | Maxemchuk | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219643 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226612 | Srenger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233556 | Teunen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233559 | Balakrishnan | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233561 | Junqua et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236968 | Kanevsky et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246981 | Papineni et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6246990 | Happ | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6266636 | Kosaka et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269336 | Ladd et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272455 | Hoshen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6275231 | Obradovich | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6278968 | Franz et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6288319 | Catona | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6292767 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6301560 | Masters | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308151 | Smith | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6314402 | Monaco et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6321196 | Franceschi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6356869 | Chapados et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6362748 | Huang | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366882 | Bijl et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6366886 | Dragosh et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374214 | Friedland et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377913 | Coffman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6381535 | Durocher et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385596 | Wiser et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6385646 | Brown et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393403 | Majaniemi | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393428 | Miller et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6397181 | Li et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6404878 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6405170 | Phillips et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6408272 | White et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411810 | Maxemchuk | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6415257 | Junqua et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6418210 | Sayko | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420975 | DeLine et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429813 | Feigen | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6430285 | Bauer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6430531 | Polish | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434523 | Monaco | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434524 | Weber | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434529 | Walker et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6442522 | Carberry et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6446114 | Bulfer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453153 | Bowker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453292 | Ramaswamy et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6456711 | Cheung et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6456974 | Baker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466654 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466899 | Yano et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470315 | Netsch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6487495 | Gale et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6498797 | Anerousis et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499013 | Weber | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6501833 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6501834 | Milewski et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6505155 | Vanbuskirk et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6510417 | Woods et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6513006 | Howard et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6522746 | Marchok et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523061 | Halverson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6532444 | Weber | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6539348 | Bond et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6549629 | Finn et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553372 | Brassell et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6556970 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6556973 | Lewin | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6560576 | Cohen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6560590 | Shwe et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567778 | Chao Chang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567797 | Schuetze et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6570555 | Prevost et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6570964 | Murveit et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571279 | Herz et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6574597 | Mohri et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6574624 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6578022 | Foulger et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6581103 | Dengler | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6584439 | Geilhufe et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6587858 | Strazza | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6591239 | McCall et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6594257 | Doshi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6594367 | Marash et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6598018 | Junqua | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601026 | Appelt et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6604075 | Brown et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6604077 | Dragosh et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6606598 | Holthouse et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6611692 | Raffel et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6614773 | Maxemchuk | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6615172 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622119 | Ramaswamy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6629066 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6631346 | Karaorman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6631351 | Ramachandran et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6633846 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6643620 | Contolini et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6650747 | Bala et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6658388 | Kleindienst et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6678680 | Woo | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6681206 | Gorin et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6691151 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6701294 | Ball et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6704396 | Parolkar et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6704576 | Brachman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6704708 | Pickering | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6708150 | Hirayama et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6721001 | Berstis | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6721706 | Strubbe et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6735592 | Neumann et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6739556 | Langston | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6741931 | Kohut et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6742021 | Halverson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6745161 | Arnold et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6751591 | Gorin et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6751612 | Schuetze et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6754485 | Obradovich et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6754627 | Woodward | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757544 | Rangarajan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757718 | Halverson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6795808 | Strubbe et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6801604 | Maes et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6801893 | Backfried et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6813341 | Mahoney | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6829603 | Chai et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6832230 | Zilliacus et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6833848 | Wolff et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6850603 | Eberle et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6856990 | Barile et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6865481 | Kawazoe et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6868380 | Kroeker | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6868385 | Gerson | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6873837 | Yoshioka et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6877001 | Wolf et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6877134 | Fuller et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6901366 | Kuhn et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6910003 | Arnold et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6912498 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6934756 | Maes | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937977 | Gerson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6937982 | Kitaoka et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6944594 | Busayapongchai et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6950821 | Faybishenko et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6954755 | Reisman | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6959276 | Droppo et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6961700 | Mitchell et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6968311 | Knockeart et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6973387 | Masclet et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6975993 | Keiller | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6980092 | Turnbull et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6983055 | Luo | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6990513 | Belfiore et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6996531 | Korall et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7003463 | Maes et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7016849 | Arnold et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020609 | Thrift et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7024364 | Guerra et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7027586 | Bushey et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7027975 | Pazandak et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7035415 | Belt et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7036128 | Julia et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7043425 | Pao | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054817 | Shao | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7058890 | George et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7062488 | Reisman | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7069220 | Coffman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7072834 | Zhou | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082469 | Gold et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7085708 | Manson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7092928 | Elad et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7107210 | Deng et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7107218 | Preston | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7110951 | Lemelson et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7127400 | Koch | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7130390 | Abburi | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7136875 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7137126 | Coffman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7143037 | Chestnut | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7143039 | Stifelman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7146319 | Hunt | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7149696 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7165028 | Gong | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7184957 | Brookes et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7190770 | Ando et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197069 | Agazzi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197460 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7203644 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206418 | Yang et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7207011 | Mulvey et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7215941 | Beckmann et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228276 | Omote et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7231343 | Treadgold et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7236923 | Gupta | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7254482 | Kawasaki et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7272212 | Eberle et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7277854 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7283829 | Christenson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7283951 | Marchisio et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7289606 | Sibal et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7299186 | Kuzunuki et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7301093 | Sater et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7305381 | Poppink et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7321850 | Wakita | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7328155 | Endo et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337116 | Charlesworth et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7340040 | Saylor et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7366285 | Parolkar et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366669 | Nishitani et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7376645 | Bernard | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7386443 | Parthasarathy et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7398209 | Kennewick et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7406421 | Odinak et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7415414 | Azara et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7421393 | Di Fabbrizio et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7424431 | Greene et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7447635 | Konopka et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7451088 | Ehlen et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7454608 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7461059 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7472020 | Brulle-Drews | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7472060 | Gorin et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7478036 | Shen et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7487088 | Gorin et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7493259 | Jones et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7493559 | Wolff et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7502738 | Kennewick et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7516076 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7529675 | Maes | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536297 | Byrd et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7536374 | Au | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542894 | Murata | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7546382 | Healey et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7558730 | Davis et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7574362 | Walker et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7577244 | Taschereau | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7606708 | Hwang | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7620549 | Di Cristo et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7634409 | Kennewick et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640006 | Portman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640160 | Di Cristo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640272 | Mahajan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7676365 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7676369 | Fujimoto et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7684977 | Morikawa | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7693720 | Kennewick et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7729916 | Coffman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7729918 | Walker et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7729920 | Chaar et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7748021 | Obradovich | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7788084 | Brun et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7801731 | Odinak et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7809570 | Kennewick et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7818176 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7831426 | Bennett | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7831433 | Belvin et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7873519 | Bennett | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7873523 | Potter et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7873654 | Bernard | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7881936 | Longe et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7890324 | Bangalore et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7894849 | Kass et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7902969 | Obradovich | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917367 | Di Cristo et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7920682 | Byrne et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7949529 | Weider et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949537 | Walker et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7953732 | Frank et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7974875 | Quilici et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7983917 | Kennewick et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7984287 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8005683 | Tessel et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8015006 | Kennewick et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8060367 | Keaveney | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8069046 | Kennewick et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8073681 | Baldwin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8077975 | Ma et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8082153 | Coffman et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086463 | Ativanichayaphong et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8112275 | Kennewick et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8140327 | Kennewick et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8140335 | Kennewick et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8145489 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8150694 | Kennewick et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8155962 | Kennewick et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8170867 | Germain | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8195468 | Weider et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8219399 | Lutz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8219599 | Tunstall-Pedoe | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224652 | Wang et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8255224 | Singleton et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8326627 | Kennewick et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8326634 | Di Cristo et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8326637 | Baldwin et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8332224 | Di Cristo et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8370147 | Kennewick et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8447607 | Weider et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8452598 | Kennewick et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8515765 | Baldwin et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8527274 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 20010041980 | Howard et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049601 | Kroeker et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010054087 | Flom et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020015500 | Belt et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022927 | Lemelson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029261 | Shibata | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032752 | Gold et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035501 | Handel et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049805 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065568 | Silfvast et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069059 | Smith | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069071 | Knockeart et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082911 | Dunn et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087326 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087525 | Abbott et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107694 | Lerg | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120609 | Lang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124050 | Middeljans | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133402 | Faber et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138248 | Corston-Oliver et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143532 | McLean et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143535 | Kist et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161646 | Gailey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173961 | Guerra | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184373 | Maes | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188602 | Stubler et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198714 | Zhou | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030014261 | Kageyama | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030016835 | Elko et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046346 | Mumick et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064709 | Gailey et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065427 | Funk et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088421 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097249 | Walker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110037 | Walker et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030112267 | Belrose | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115062 | Walker et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120493 | Gupta | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135488 | Amir et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144846 | Denenberg et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030158731 | Falcon et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030161448 | Parolkar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182132 | Niemoeller | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204492 | Wolf et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030206640 | Malvar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212550 | Ubale | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212558 | Matula | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212562 | Patel et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225825 | Healey et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236664 | Sharma | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006475 | Ehlen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040025115 | Sienel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044516 | Kennewick et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098245 | Walker et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117179 | Balasuriya | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117804 | Scahill et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040140989 | Papageorge | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158555 | Seedman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040166832 | Portman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167771 | Duan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193408 | Hunt | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193420 | Kennewick et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199375 | Ehsani et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205671 | Sukehiro et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243417 | Pitts, III et al. | Dec 2004 | A9 |
| 20050015256 | Kargman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021334 | Iwahashi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021470 | Martin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021826 | Kumar | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033574 | Kim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043940 | Elder | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114116 | Fiedler | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125232 | Gadd | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137850 | Odell | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137877 | Oesterling et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143994 | Mori et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216254 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234727 | Chiu | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246174 | DeGolia | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283752 | Fruchter et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060041431 | Maes | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047509 | Ding et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206310 | Ravikumar et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217133 | Christenson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060285662 | Yin et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070033005 | Cristo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070033020 | Kelleher Francois et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038436 | Cristo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043574 | Coffman et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043868 | Kumar et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050191 | Weider et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055525 | Kennewick et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073544 | Millett et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078708 | Yu et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078709 | Rajaram | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118357 | Kasravi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135101 | Ramati et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070146833 | Satomi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162296 | Altberg et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179778 | Gong et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070186165 | Maislos et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198267 | Jones et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214182 | Rosenberg | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250901 | McIntire et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265850 | Kennewick et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299824 | Pan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080034032 | Healey et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065386 | Cross et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091406 | Baldwin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103761 | Printz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109285 | Reuther et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115163 | Gilboa et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133215 | Sarukkai | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140385 | Mahajan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147410 | Odinak | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177530 | Cross et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080189110 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235023 | Kennewick et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235027 | Cross | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319751 | Kennewick et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090052635 | Jones et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090067599 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076827 | Bulitta et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106029 | DeLine et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090117885 | Roth | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090144271 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150156 | Kennewick et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171664 | Kennewick et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216540 | Tessel et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271194 | Davis et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090273563 | Pryor | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276700 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313026 | Coffman et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100023320 | Di Cristo et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100029261 | Mikkelsen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036967 | Caine et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049501 | Kennewick et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049514 | Kennewick et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057443 | Di Cristo et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100063880 | Atsmon et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100145700 | Kennewick et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185512 | Borger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100204986 | Kennewick et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100204994 | Kennewick et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217604 | Baldwin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100286985 | Kennewick et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299142 | Freeman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312566 | Odinak et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110112827 | Kennewick et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110112921 | Kennewick et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131036 | Di Cristo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131045 | Cristo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110231182 | Weider et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110231188 | Kennewick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20120022857 | Baldwin et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101809 | Kennewick et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101810 | Kennewick et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120109753 | Kennewick et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120150636 | Freeman et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278073 | Weider et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130054228 | Baldwin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211710 | Kennewick et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130253929 | Weider et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 320 043 | Jun 2003 | EP |
| 1 646 037 | Apr 2006 | EP |
| WO 9946763 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 0021232 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 0046792 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 0178065 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 2004072954 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2007019318 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007021587 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007027546 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007027989 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008098039 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008118195 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009075912 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009145796 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010096752 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Statement in Accordance with the Notice from the European Patent Office dated Oct. 1, 2007 Concerning Business Methods (OJ EPO Nov. 2007, 592-593), XP002456252. |
| Reuters, “IBM to Enable Honda Drivers to Talk to Cars”, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Jul. 28, 2002, 1 page. |
| Lin, Bor-shen, et al., “A Distributed Architecture for Cooperative Spoken Dialogue Agents with Coherent Dialogue State and History”, ASRU'99, 1999, 4 pages. |
| Kuhn, Thomas, et al., “Hybrid In-Car Speech Recognition for Mobile Multimedia Applications”, Vehicular Technology Conference, IEEE, Jul. 1999, pp. 2009-2013. |
| Belvin, Robert, et al., “Development of the HRL Route Navigation Dialogue System”, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, San Diego, 2001, pp. 1-5. |
| Lind, R., et al., “The Network Vehicle—A Glimpse into the Future of Mobile Multi-Media”, IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Systems Magazine, vol. 14, No. 9, Sep. 1999, pp. 27-32. |
| Zhao, Yilin, “Telematics: Safe and Fun Driving”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 17, Issue 1, 2002, pp. 10-14. |
| Chai et al., “MIND: A Semantics-Based Multimodal Interpretation Framework for Conversational System”, Proceedings of the International CLASS Workshop on Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems, Jun. 2002, pp. 37-46. |
| Cheyer et al., “Multimodal Maps: An Agent-Based Approach”, International Conference on Cooperative Multimodal Communication (CMC/95), May 24-26, 1995, pp. 111-121. |
| Elio et al., “On Abstract Task Models and Conversation Policies” in Workshop on Specifying and Implementing Conversation Policies, Autonomous Agents '99, Seattle, 1999, 10 pages. |
| Turunen, “Adaptive Interaction Methods in Speech User Interfaces”, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington, 2001, pp. 91-92. |
| Mao, Mark Z., “Automatic Training Set Segmentation for Multi-Pass Speech Recognition”, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, CA, copyright 2005, IEEE, pp. 1-685 to 1-688. |
| Vanhoucke, Vincent, “Confidence Scoring and Rejection Using Multi-Pass Speech Recognition”, Nuance Communications, Menlo Park, CA, 2005, 4 pages. |
| Weng, Fuliang, et al., “Efficient Lattice Representation and Generation”, Speech Technology and Research Laboratory, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1998, 4 pages. |
| El Meliani et al., “A Syllabic-Filler-Based Continuous Speech Recognizer for Unlimited Vocabulary”, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 2, Sep. 5-8, 1995, pp. 1007-1010. |
| Arrington, Michael, “Google Redefines GPS Navigation Landscape: Google Maps Navigation for Android 2.0”, TechCrunch, printed from the Internet <http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/28/google-redefines-car-gps-navigation-google-maps-navigation-android/>, Oct. 28, 2009, 4 pages. |
| Bazzi, Issam et al., “Heterogeneous Lexical Units for Automatic Speech Recognition: Preliminary Investigations”, Processing of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 3, Jun. 5-9, 2000, XP010507574, pp. 1257-1260. |
| O'Shaughnessy, Douglas, “Interacting with Computers by Voice: Automatic Speech Recognition and Synthesis”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, No. 9, Sep. 1, 2003, XP011100665, pp. 1272-1305. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090299745 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
