System and method for analyzing de-identified health care data

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8930404
  • Patent Number
    8,930,404
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 24, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 6, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A system and method for creating a unique alias associated with an individual identified in a health care database such that health care data, and particularly pharmaceutical-related data, can be efficiently gathered and analyzed. The system has a first data store for storing at least one record where each record includes a plurality of identification fields which when concatenated uniquely identify an individual, and at least one health care field corresponding to health care data associated with the individual. The system also has a second data store, and a processor. The processor selects a record of the first data store, then selects a subset of the plurality of identification fields within the selected record, and concatenates the selected subset of identification fields. Then the processor stores the concatenated identification fields in a record in the second data store with the at least one health care field from the selected record of the first data store.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention generally relates to computer systems and databases. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for the gathering and analysis of health-care related data, and specifically the gathering and analysis of information regarding the use of pharmaceuticals by individuals. The present invention also relates to techniques for de-identifying the individuals from such pharmaceutical data, in order to maintain privacy.


2. Description of the Related Art


In the medical information field, pharmaceutical claims are processed on large computer systems which receive claims data for patients who have been prescribed one or more medications and have filed claims with insurance companies (or government entities) in order to have the claim paid by the company or entity. The claims data includes very specific details and attributes about the individuals making the claims. For example, attributes can include name, gender, birth date, address, medical diagnosis, specific drug prescribed, and other drugs the patient is using. Consequently, this data is very useful in assisting marketing research relative to usage of a specific drug and identifying various attributes that impact the usage.


The claims data is typically received at a data “clearinghouse” which can be a database for a specific insurance company or a larger database providing the claim processing service for many insurance companies. Moreover, the claims data that are produced by claimants include a significant amount of data, with millions of new claims being entered into the system each month. Several of the claims data clearinghouses have systems handling many terabytes of claims data. Because of the large size of the data being produced and the large amount of attributes, the data is in an inadequate format for efficient search, retrieval and analysis of specific attributes.


Recently, there have been laws passed that prevent the transmission of personal information associated with individuals, within health care claims data. This legislation particularly prohibits the transfer of specific personal data such as names, addresses and social security numbers. Thus, the claims data is no longer allowed to be transmitted from the clearinghouse to others in raw form with the personal data. Without the personal information to segregate the claims data, it becomes much harder to generate valuable research and market data based upon the unique attributes for specific individuals, such as age, gender and geographic distribution.


It is therefore desirous to provide the ability to efficiently gather information from the claims databases to allow research and analysis of the attributes that effect the pharmaceutical industry. Accordingly, the present invention is primarily directed to systems and methods for overcoming the problems discussed above, as well as related limitations of the prior art.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to a system and method for creating a unique alias associated with an individual identified in a health care database, that allows the aggregation of segregated data for marketing research. The system may include a first data store for storing at least one record where each record has a plurality of identification fields, such as name and birth date, which when concatenated uniquely identify an individual, and at least one health care field corresponding to health care data associated with the individual, such as a medication type. The system may also have a second data store and a processor that selects a record of the first data store, selects a subset of the plurality of identification fields within the selected record, concatenates the selected subset of identification fields, and stores the concatenated identification fields in a record in the second data store along with at least one health care field from the selected record of the first data store. The first data store and the second data store can either be located within the same database or in separate databases.


The health care data stored within the first data store may, in one embodiment, correspond to pharmaceutical claims data. The selected subset may correspond to a specific person in the healthcare database, and the person's last name, birthday, and gender are concatenated to form a unique identifier for that record. The processor may analyze longitudinal and historical records of individuals using individual-level linking methodologies based on the concatenated identification fields and the at least one health care field of each record of the second data store. The health care data also can have personal data removed from the various records such that only medically significant information remains, and the identifier allows the medical information to be segregated such that the individual records are still identifiable.


In order to more efficiently process the tremendous amount of data of the health care records, the processor may perform the further steps of selectively gathering the records from the first data store and selectively manipulating the records into a data cube. The records of the first data store are typically in tabular form, and the process of manipulating the records comprises selectively joining and projecting records from the various tabular records in the first data store to ultimately form a data cube comprised of a table of records. The data cube format allows the processor to more easily perform a search of the health care records, and also generate a report by displaying the records 25 of a specific data cube.


The present invention thus provides a method for creating a unique alias associated with an individual identified in a health care database, wherein the health care database stores at least one record, and each record has a plurality of identification fields which when taken together uniquely identify an individual, and at least one health care field may correspond to health care data associated with the individual. The method includes the steps of selecting a record within the health care database, selecting a subset of the plurality of identification fields within the selected record, concatenating the selected subset of identification fields, and storing the concatenated identification fields in a record in a second database with the at least one health care field from the selected record of the first data store. The method preferably includes the step of analyzing longitudinal, historical records of individuals using individual level linking methodologies based on the concatenated identification fields and the at least one health care field of each record of the second database.


The step of selecting a record within the health care database may comprise selecting a record from pharmaceutical claims data. Further, the step of concatenating the selected subset of identification fields may comprise, for example, concatenating, for a specific person in the healthcare database, that person's last name, birthday, and gender. Thus, based on the concatenated identification fields and the at least one health care field of each record of the second data store, the method may include the step of analyzing longitudinal, historical records of individuals using individual-level linking methodologies.


As discussed above, the method further may include the steps of selectively gathering the records from the first data store, and selectively manipulating the records into a data cube. The step of selecting a record within the health care database may comprise selecting records of the first data store that are in tabular form, and the step of selectively manipulating the records into a data cube may comprise selectively joining and projecting records from the first data store and creating a data cube comprising a table of records.


The data cube allows the present system to aggregate the records in an efficient format such that all new records can be viewed shortly after posting. Further, the unique population identifiers allow users to follow patients over time yielding important results unavailable in other databases, such as patient drug switching behavior. By linking medical and pharmacy transactions at the patient level, new insights such as indication specific use of drugs and patient comorbidities can be determined.


The report displayed by the system may contain several attributes, such as: market shares geographic information at the national, regional, state and MSA levels; trends over time including annual, quarterly, monthly, and weekly periods; traditional measures such as total, new and refilled prescription counts; source of business such as new prescription starts, switches, and continuing patients; prescriber specialty; patient demographics for age and gender; indication specific use; and patient comorbidities. The system can therefore be used in a number of ways to help make business decisions, such as monitoring new drug launches and marketing campaigns, enhanced sales force targeting, and micro-marketing in select geographic areas or to select customers. Furthermore, the system can be used for forecasting and development of a pharmaceutical marketing strategy including indication-specific product positioning, early warning market share shifts, clinical trial site selection, investigator recruiting, and accurate intelligence on market size and demand.


Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the drawings, detailed description of the invention, and the claims, below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D and 1E are block and flow diagrams showing the overall structure and overall flow of the present invention in one embodiment.



FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 2C are block and flow diagrams showing the overall structure and overall flow of the present invention in one embodiment.



FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C illustrate a flow and relationship diagram, showing the overall flow and data relationship of the present invention.



FIG. 4 illustrates the operation of the Daily Rx Load Process of the present invention.



FIG. 5 illustrates the operation of the Monthly Mx Load Process of the present invention.



FIG. 6 illustrates the operation of the Monthly Hx Load Process of the present invention.



FIG. 7 illustrates the operation of Quarter Monthly Rx Merge Process of the present invention.



FIG. 8 illustrates the operation of the Prepare Mx Data Process of the present invention.



FIG. 9 illustrates the operation of the Produce Patient Data Process of the present invention.



FIG. 9A illustrates the operation of the RSTRANSFORMER process of the present invention.



FIG. 10 illustrates the operation of the Pull Cube Data Process of the present invention.



FIG. 11 illustrates the operation of the Generate TC Cube Data Process of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

With reference to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements throughout, FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 2A, 2B, and 2C illustrate a high-level combined block/flow diagram for the present invention. These figures represent both the elements of a block diagram for, as well as the steps performed by the system of, the present invention.


Referring to FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 2A, 2B, and 2C, the primary processing that takes place in the present invention may be performed by, for example, a high-performance computing system, such as a Sun Microsystems ES10000 computer (at SITE 2). On a periodic basis, such as each day, seven days per week, a computing system at SITE 1 places healthcare claims data at step 103 via a secure connection 190 onto a computer system at SITE 1. This healthcare claims data may include, for example, pharmaceutical, 20 medical, and hospital claims 101 that have been “de-identified” at step 102 (explained in further detail below).


The claims data is de-identified at step 102 before it is sent to SITE 2, which includes applying a unique identifier, encrypting this identifier, and removing specific patient identifying fields. Data is then loaded into database tables (such as an Oracle database) at step 104 that also reside on SITE 2. At step 105, SITE 2 runs all processes for analyzing and consolidating the data and for transforming the resulting Oracle tables into OLAP cubes.


The cube building process may run on a different computer (such as SITE 2). Cubes are modeled using an OLAP product on a desktop computer under, for example, the Windows NT operating system.


The cube deployment process may run on a different computer (such as SITE 3). A computing system at SITE 2 places cubes and metadata files at step 106 via a secure connection to SITE 3. Processes run at step 107 at SITE 3 to place the cube on the production web site and to update the web site pages with the associated metadata.


The present process performed at SITE 2 after obtaining data from the SITE 1 computer, making data ready for cube transformers, and then displaying it on the web 5 at SITE 3 can be logically divided into six major steps, as shown in FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C.

    • 1. Load Oracle Tables (step 301)
    • 2. Produce Patient Data (step 302)
    • 3. Pull Cube Data (step 303)
    • 4. Generate Cube Data (step 304)
    • 5. Build Cube (step 305)
    • 6. Automated Cube Deployment and Metadata Update Process


All these processes are handled, maintained and executed at regular daily, weekly and monthly intervals. There are some processes which are done out of the routine process, such as generation of DOI, zip-state-region, ICD9, etc. tables. FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C show a high level overview of the processes used to create cubes.


1. Load Oracle Tables (Step 301)


The Load Oracle Tables process (step 301) can be divided into two logically different steps, daily and monthly processes, described in further detail below with respect to FIGS. 4-8. The daily routines convert the text format data supplied from SITE 1 into “RX” and “Do Not Use Company Name (DNU)” daily Oracle tables. The monthly processes convert Hospital (HX) and Medical (MX) data into monthly Oracle tables. Note that all run times provided below correspond to approximate run times.


1.1 Daily Rx Load Process 401


The Daily Rx Load Process 401 is described below with respect to FIG. 4:















Script Use
Loaddaily.sh is the unix shell script that uses the SQL Loader



Rx Control File to Convert the Rx Text File from SITE 1



into LOAD_YYYYMMDD,



{DNU}_YYYY MMDD Oracle tables after doing all the



necessary number, char and date conversions. The {DNU}



list contains BLUFFCREEK, KROGER, OMNI, PCN,



VIP and WALGREENS.


Input
YYYYMMDD.synergy.log.gz,



RX Control file, YYYYMMDD.ctl.


Output
LOAD_19991123, 24 etc. tables for each day of a month.



WALGREENS_YYYYMMDD etc. tables for each DNU



company.



../log/YYYYMMDD.log



../data.YYYYMMDD.synergy.log



../bad/YYYYMMDD.synergy.bad



../discard/YYYYMMDD.synergy.discard.


Frequency
Daily


Run Time
~4 hours









1.2 Monthly Mx Load Process 501


The Monthly Mx Load Process 501 is described below with respect to FIG. 5:















Script Use
SQL LOADER process reads MXDaily.MMDDYY text file



and control file to convert it into LOAD_MX_YYYYMM



tables.


Input
/raid/4011/envoydata/mx/oct1999/data/MXDaily.100199



MX Control file, yyyymmdd.ctl.


Output
LOAD_MX_YYYYMM table


Frequency
Monthly


Run Time
~8 hours









1.3 Load HX Text Data 601


The Load HX Text Data Process 601 is described below with respect to FIG. 6:















Script Use
SQL LOADER process reads MX text file and Control File to



convert it into WH_ENVOY_HX_SEP99 tables.


Input
/raid/4011/envoydata/hx/sep1999/data/



MCDS.DPRET60.090199,



HX Control file, yyyymmdd.ctl.


Output
WH_ENVOY_HX_SEP99_10..20..30..36..40..46..50..



60..61..66..70..80..90 tables for HX.


Frequency
Monthly


Run Time
~8 hours









1.4 Quarter-Monthly Rx Merge 701


The Quarter-Monthly Rx Merge Process 701 is described below with respect to FIG. 7:















Script Use
This process uses RX_Weekly_New.sql SQL script to



combine all the daily (approx.. 8 days of tables) RX and DNU



tables into quarter-monthly tables.


Input
LOAD_19991123..24 etc. tables for each day of a month



WALGREENS_YYYYMMDD etc. tables for each “DNU”



company


Output
WH_ENVOY_9911A..B..C..D etc. 4 tables for a month.



WALGREENS_9911A..B..C..D like tables for each “DNU”



company for a month.


Frequency
Monthly


Run Time
~6 hours









1.5 Prepare Mx Data (801)


The Prepare mx Data Process 801 is described below with respect to FIG. 8:















Script Use
This process uses Process_Monthly_MX.sql SQL script to



validate and convert LOAD_MX_YYYYMM table



data into required date, char and numbers.


Input
LOAD_MX_YYYYMM,



WHREF_DONOT_USE_MX


Output
WH_ENVOY_YYYYMM



BAD_PAYER_ID_YYYYMM


Frequency
Monthly


Run Time










2. Produce Patient Data (Step 302)


The Produce Patient Data Process of step 302 (FIG. 3B) is described below in further detail with respect to FIG. 9:















Script Use
This process uses Master_PXpgmv1b_9910.sql SQL script to



combine weekly RX and monthly MX, HX tables to create a



relational



WHREF_ENVOY_PXYYMM table.


Input
WH_ENVOY_YYMMA..B etc.,



WH_ENVOY_MX_YYYYMM,



WH_ENVOY_HX_MMMYY_20 tables.


Output
WHREF_PATIENT REPOSITORY RXMM,



WHREF_MXTEMP_YYMM,



WHREF_HXTEMP_YYMM,



WHREF_ENVOY_PXYYMM tables.


Frequency
Monthly


Run Time
~13 hours










3. Pull Cube Data (Step 303)


The Produce Patient Data Process of step 303 (FIG. 3B) is described below in further detail with respect to FIG. 10:


This process uses a series of Oracle stored procedures to allow for error checking and audit logging. Logging for these procedures uses the MM_LOG table. These stored procedures are called from the Unix shell using shell script wrappers that input the necessary variable values. The stored procedures used are as follows:

    • mm00_init
    • mm01_set ears
    • mm02_weekly_data_pull
    • mm03_memids
    • mm04_mx_diags


3.1 Audit Logging in Oracle Table MM_LOG


Structure of the MM_LOG table.



















RUN_DATE
START_TIME
STOP_TIME
CUBE_NAME
PROCESS
RETURN_CODE





10-Jul-00
8:26:37
 8:26:38

mm00_init( )
0


10-Jul-00
8:26:38
 8:26:;38

mm01_set_vars( )
0


11-Jul-00
8:26:38
12:35:49

mm02_weekly_data_pull( )
0


11-Jul-00
2:04:59
12:11:57

mm03_memids( )
0


11-Jul-00
1:07:32
11:23:46

mm04_mx_diags( )
1















RUN_DATE
START_TIME
ERROR_CODE
DESCR







10-Jul-00
8:26:37
Completed
Procedure mm00_init( ) completed






successfully



10-Jul-00
8:26:38
Completed
Procedure mm01_set_vars( ) completed






successfully



11-Jul-00
8:26:38
Completed
Procedure mm02_weekly_data_pull( )






completed successfully.



11-Jul-00
2:04:59
Completed
Procedure m03_memids( ) completed






successfully



11-Jul-00
1:07:32
−904
ORA-00904: invalid column name










A record is added to MM_LOG for each process. The name of the process is in the PROCESS column. For cube specific processes, the name of the cube is in the CUBE_NAME column. When a process successfully completes, the RETURN_CODE column contains a 0; when there is an error, the RETURN_CODE column contains a 1.


3.2 Initialization















Script
The mm00_init procedure initializes the environment for weekly


Use
Market Monitory cube processing. The mmOO.sh shell script



calls the mm00_init procedure.


Input
None


Output
MM_LOG table truncated.



MM_VARS table truncated.



CUBE_DATA_TEXT table truncated.



MM_LOG table—row inserted showing successful



completion or error condition.









3.3 Set Variables















Script Use
The mm01_set_vars procedure sets variables for the Rx Market Monitor



weekly cube processing. The mm01.sh shell script calls the



mm01_set_vars procedure with input variables set as text. The



mm00_init procedure must already have been run.









Input
p_run_date
Run date of pull as text ‘YYYYMMDD’.



p_start_date
Start date of pull as text ‘YYYYMMDD’.



p_end_date
End date of pull as text ‘YYYYMMDD’.



p_post_date
Post date of pull as text ‘YYYYMMDD.



p_acute_lookback
Acute lookback date as text ‘YYYYMMDD’.



p_chronic_lookback
Chronic lookback date as text ‘YYYYMMDD’’.








Output
MM_VARS table - row inserted with this week's values as DATE



datatype.



MM_VARS_HIST table - row inserted with this week's values as DATE



datatype.



MM_LOG - row inserted showing successful completion or error



condition.









3.4 Pull Weekly Data
















Script
The mm02_weekly_data_pull procedure pulls one week of



Use
Rx data for weekly Rx Market Monitor cube processing.



The mm02.sh shell script calls this procedure with the tablespace



variable input set. The mm00_init and mm01_set_vars



procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.



MM_VARS table









WH_ENVOY_YYMM where YYMM is the two character



year and month from start_date in MM_VARS table.



WWW_MASTER_DOI


Output
Last week's WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL table is renamed to



WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL_YYYYMMDD where



YYYYMMDD is one day before the start_date in



MM_VARS table. New WEB-DATA-WEEK-PULL table is



created in the WEB schema in the tablespace named



in the p_tablespace parameter. The



WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL table contains Rx data from



the start and end dates in the MM_VARS table.



MM_LOG—a row is inserted to indicate either successful



completion or error condition.









3.5 Get Memids















Script
The mm03_memids procedure accumulates six weeks of


Use
memids. The mm03.sh shell script calls this procedure and



inputs the tablespace parameter. The mm00_init,



mm01_set_vars, and



mm02_weekly_data_pull procedures must



already have been run.









Input
p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.



MM_VARS table









ALL_MEM_TO CONVERT table



WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_V2_MONDD table where



MONDD is the end_date from MM_VARS table as text.



WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_V2_MONDD[1-5] tables where



MONDD[1-5] are the previous five weeks of data.



RXMEMID SEQ table


Output
WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_V2_MONDD table is created where



MONDD is start_date in MM_VARS table minus one day.



WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_PULL is created with data for current



week and previous 5 weeks.



MM_LOG—a row is inserted to indicate either successful



completion or error condition.









3.6 Get Mx Diagnoses















Script
The mm04_mx_diags procedure gets diagnoses information


Use
from Mx tables for weekly processing. The mm04.sh shell script



executes this procedure with the tablespace input variable set.



The mm00_init, mm01_set_vars,



mm02_weekly_data_pull, and mm03_memids



procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.



MM_VARS table









WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



MASTER PX table



WEB_MXPTS_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



WH_ENVOY_MX_YYYYMM[1-3] tables where



YYYYMM[1-3] are the current month and two prior months



of data.



WEB_RXMX_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



RXMEMID_SEQ table


Output
ACUTE_RXMX table—records from the week are appended.



CHRONIC_RXMX table—records from the week are



appended.



MM_LOG table—row inserted to indicate either successful



completion or error condition.










4. Generate TC Cube Data (Step 304)


The Generate TC Cube Data Process of step 304 (FIG. 3C) is described below in further detail with respect to FIG. 11:


The Generate TC Cube Data Process 304 uses three Oracle stored procedures to generate a cube table which will be further used by data transformers to build a COGNOS readable multi-dimensional formatted cube structure. The last stored procedure updates statistics for each cube. The stored procedures are as follows:

    • mm05_step1
    • mm06_step2
    • mm07_step3
    • mm08_cube metadata


4.1 Process Step 1101 (Step 1)















Script Use
The mm05_stepl procedure must be run for each therapeutic



class. This procedure inserts records into the



CMID_V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the p_class



specified. The mm00_init, mm01_set_vars,



mm02_weekly_data_pull, mm03_memids, and



mm04_mx_diags procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_class
Class name.



p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.



p_lookback
Number of days of lookback



p_condition
“ACUTE” or “CHRONIC”









MM_VARS table



WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



CUBE_V2_LIST table



CMID_V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the p_class.


Output
Records inserted into CMID_V2_CLASS table where



CLASS is the p_class.



New CMID_V2_CLASS_TMP table is created where



CLASS is the p_class.



MM_LOG table—row inserted to indicate either successful



completion or error condition.









4.2 Process Step 1102 (Step 2)















Script
The mm06_step2 procedure must be run for each therapeutic


Use
class. This procedure inserts records into the



RX_RESULT_V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the



p_class specified when the procedure is called. The



mm00_init, mm01_set_vars, mm02_weekly_data_pull,



mm03_memids, mm04_mx_diags, and



mm05_step1 procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_class
Class name.



p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.



p_lookback
Number of days of look back



p_condition
“ACUTE” or “CHRONIC”



MM_VARS table









CMID_V2_CLASS_TMP table where CLASS is the p_class.



CMID_V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the p_class.



RX_RESULT_TEMP_CLASS table where CLASS is the



p_class.



ZIP_ST_MSA_REG_DIV table



WEB_DEA_TO_SPEC_U


Output
New records are inserted into RX_RESULT_V2_CLASS



where CLASS is p_class.



MM_LOG table—row inserted to indicate either successful



completion or error condition.









4.3 Process Step 1103 (Step 3)















Script
The mm07 step3 procedure must be run for each therapeutic


Use
class. This procedure creates a new



RXMX_CUBE_V2_CLASS table where class is



the p_class specified. The mm00_init, mm01_set_vars,



mm02_weekly_data_pull, mm03_memids, mm04_mx_diags,



mm05_step1, and mm06_step2 procedures must already



have been run.









Input
p_class
Class name.



p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.



p_lookback
Number of days of lookback



p condition
“ACUTE” or “CHRONIC”









RXMX_CONDITION_V2 table where CONDITION is the



p_condition.



RX_RESULT_V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the p_class.



ICD9 V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the p_class.



RX_RESULT_V2_CLASS_M table where CLASS is the



p_class.


Output
New RXMX_CUBE_V2_CLASS table is created where



CLASS is p_class.



MM_LOG table—row inserted to indicate either successful



completion or error condition.









4.4 Generate Cube Metadata















Script Use
The mm08 cube_metadata procedure must be run for each



therapeutic class. This procedure updates the CUBE_DATA



table for each cube. The mm00_init, mm01_set_vars,



mm02_weekly_data_pull, mm03_memids,



mm04_mx_diags, mm05_step1, mm06_step2 and



mm07 step3 procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_class
Class name.



MM_VARS table









CUBE_DATA table where CLASS is the p_class.


Output
CUBE_DATA_TEXT table is appended where CLASS



is p_class.



MM_LOG table—row inserted to indicate either successful



completion or error condition










5. Build Cube (Step 305)


The Build Cube Process of step 305 (FIG. 3C) is described below in further detail with respect to FIG. 9A:


This process uses a C program to create a cube for each therapeutic class. Each cube is FTP'd to the server of SITE 3. Metadata for each cube is spooled to a text file and FTP'd to the SITE 3 server. The same text files may be concatenated and sent via email to the web developer of SITE 2.


5.1 Build Cube















Script Use
The program RSSERVER is repeated for each of the



therapeutic classes and called by the script



mmv2_‘class name’.sh. Data Transformers uses Model



Structure and OBES_RX_CUBE Oracle table (built in above



process) to finally build a CUBE for each of the therapeutic



class. This Cube is then used by COGNOS to show requested



information on the Web.


Input
OBES_RXMX_CUBE


Output
Cube for a OBES Class


Frequency
On Request


Run Time
~8 hours









5.2 FTP Cube to SITE 3 server















Script Use
The transfer_mm_cube.sh script renames a cube and puts a



copy into directory /raid4011/cubes/transfer where it will



automatically be FTP'd to the SITE 3 server. This script is run



in parallel for each class (class corresponds to cube).









5.3 Approve Cube















Script Use
The approve_cube script is run manually for each cube after



quality assurance has been performed. This script is run in



parallel for each class (class responds to cube).









5.4 Create Metadata text file/FTP to SITE 3 server















Script Use
The process gen_mm_file.sql is called by gen_mm_file.sh



to spool metadata for a cube to a text file. The text file is



put into a directory where it is automatically FTP'd to the



SITE 3 server. This script is run in parallel for each class.



All procedures to pull cube data must have been successfully



completed and the metadata must exist in the Oracle tables



cube_data and cube_data_text.









5.5 E-mail Metadata to Web Developer















Script Use
The email_meta.sh script will e-mail metadata to a SITE 2



Web Developer. This script is run in parallel for each class



(class corresponds to cube).










6. Automated Cube Deployment and MetaData Update Process


Automated processes exist on the OnLine Analytical Processing (OLAP) host machine to deploy data cubes (such as QUINTERNET™ Series, from Quintiles Transnational Corp.) to the production web site, cubes ready for Quality Assurance (QA) verification, as well as to automatically update “metadata” on production web pages. This enables production cube deployments and web page updates to occur during off-peak hours without any manual intervention.


As a QUINTERNET™ Series data cube is created, the cube is sent via a secure connection to the host machine. The cube is then automatically “served up” to the QA location on the web, to which only authorized personnel have access.


For each cube approval, a “metadata” file is transmitted from the SITE 2 server, via a secure connection, to the host machine in a specific location (directory within a file system). This secure transmission may occur after a data cube has passed the QA verification.


The metadata file contains statistical information about the specific cube (e.g.—date that cube contains data through, number of records, number of patients, etc.). Several times each night, an automated process may be initiated which checks for the presence of a metadata file and a corresponding data cube file. If matching files for a specific cube exist, the process automatically “serves” up this cube into production for access via the web pages. In addition, the HTML page which contains the metadata for the cube is updated with the metadata contained in the metadata file.


The server at, for example, SITE 3 may prepare and maintain HTML template files for each QUINTERNET™ Series cube. These files contain the base HTML used to create each cube's web page. Instead of the actual metadata values that will populate the cubes' web pages, the HTML template files may contain placeholder tags. These placeholder tags are replaced by data values supplied by SITE 2 in metadata files.


SITE 2 transfers the template files and the metadata files to a host via FTP. The metadata files are transferred to the host each time a cube is approved. Template files are maintained for each QUINTERNET™ Series cube and are updated by SITE 2 as necessary so that a current version of each cube's template file is always available for processing on the host.


After a cube has been updated, reviewed for quality and approved by the operator of SITE 2, SITE 2 transfers a metadata file for that cube to the host via FTP. The metadata files contains the same tags found in the HTML template file for each cube. Each of these tags is coupled with a value that will be substituted for the placeholder tag in the HTML template file.


An event-driven file processing script runs periodically via cron, a unix scheduling system, on the host. If the file processing script detects the existence of a designated flag file, a script called enable_cube.ksh is run. The enable_cube.ksh script calls a Perl script, replaceHtmlMetaTags.pl, passing it the name of the cube being processed and the name of the related metadata file. The enable_cube.ksh script also updates the metadata file with a tag/value pair representing the date the updated cube is being deployed.


The purpose of the replaceHtmlMetaTags.pl script is to automatically generate HTML pages for the QUINTERNET™ Series products. The replaceHtmlMetaTags.pl script substitutes the values in the metadata file for the placeholder tags in the template and saves the resulting output in an HTML file. Referring to FIG. 1E, the enable_cube.ksh script then promotes the updated HTML file(s) to SITE 3's web server 181 thus making it available via, for example, the Internet 183, to users of web browsers 182 operating on client computers.


The present invention may be implemented with a processing schedule defined in many ways. For example, the schedule may be on a weekly or monthly basis, depending upon the needs of the implementation. At times, special requests may be required and the ability to process data and create cubes on an ad hoc basis exists.


While there has been shown the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is to be understood that certain changes can be made in the forms and arrangements of the elements of the system and the steps of the method without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as is set forth in the Claims.


A system for analyzing de-personalized health care data includes health care databases and a processor connected to the health care databases. The health care data bases each include at least one record, and each record includes a depersonalized yet unique patient identifier associated with a patient. The de-personalized patient identifier is common for a specific patient across several health care databases. According to one embodiment, the de-personalized health care data can be pharmaceutical claims data.


The processor performs the steps of: (i) receiving records from the health care databases; (ii) querying the records received from the health care databases, based upon selected person-level criteria; and (iii) generating at least one report based upon the results of the querying step. In another embodiment, the generating step performed by the processor can include the step of manipulating the results for display in specific views that satisfy specific analytical goals. In yet another embodiment, the generating step performed by the processor can include the step of displaying the report in a tabular format.


A method for analyzing de-personalized health care data within health care databases, wherein the health care databases each include at least one record. Each record includes a depersonalized yet unique patient identifier associated with a patient. The de-personalized patient identifier is common for a specific patient across the health care databases. According to one embodiment, the de-personalized health care data includes pharmaceutical claims data. The method includes the steps of: (a) receiving records from the health care databases; (b) querying the records received from the health care databases; and (c) generating at least one record based upon the results of the querying step. In one embodiment, the generating step includes the step of manipulating the results for display in specific views that satisfy specific analytical goals. In another embodiment, the generating step includes the step of displaying the report in a tabular format.

Claims
  • 1. A system for de-identifying health care data, comprising: at least one health care database, the at least one health care database including at least one patient record, each patient record including a plurality of identification fields associated with a patient and at least one health care field, wherein at least one subset of the identification fields associated with a patient uniquely identifies the patient; andone or more processors in communication with the at least one health care database and a second database, wherein the one or more processors execute instructions that cause the one or more processors to: select a patient record from the at least one health care database,access a plurality of the identification fields included in the patient record, the accessed plurality of identification fields uniquely identifying the patient,concatenate, into a string, information from each of the accessed plurality of identification fields included in the patient record,generate an encrypted unique patient identifier by encrypting the concatenated string of information,generating a de-identified patient record, wherein the de-identified patient record includes the at least one health care field that is included in the selected patient record and the encrypted unique patient identifier, and wherein the de-identified patient record does not include any information that identifies the patient other than the encrypted unique patient identifier, andtransmit the de-identified patient record to the second database.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one health care field that is included in the selected patient record comprises pharmaceutical claims data, medical claims data, or hospital claims data.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors execute instructions that cause the one or more processors to: identify one or more records stored in the second database that include the encrypted unique patient identifier, andgenerate a report based on data included in the identified records.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of identification fields included in the selected patient record include one or more of a patient's name, address, social security number, birthday, or gender.
  • 5. A method for de-identifying health care data comprising: selecting, by one or more processors, a patient record from at least one health care database, wherein the at least one health care database includes at least one patient record, each patient record including a plurality of identification fields associated with a patient and at least one health care field, and wherein at least one subset of the identification fields associated with a patient uniquely identifies the patient;accessing a plurality of the identification fields included in the patient record, the accessed plurality of identification fields uniquely identifying the patient;concatenating, into a string, information from each of the accessed plurality of identification fields included in the patient record;generating an encrypted unique patient identifier by encrypting the concatenated string of information;generating a de-identified patient record, wherein the de-identified patient record includes the at least one health care field that is included in the selected patient record and the encrypted unique patient identifier, and wherein the de-identified patient record does not include any information that identifies the patient other than the encrypted unique patient identifier; andtransmitting the de-identified patient record to the second database.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the at least one health care field that is included in the selected patient record comprises pharmaceutical claims data, medical claims data, or hospital claims data.
  • 7. The method of claim 5 further comprising: identifying one or more records stored in the second database that include the encrypted unique patient identifier; andgenerating a report based on data included in the identified records.
  • 8. The method of claim 5, wherein the plurality of identification fields included in the selected patient record include one or more of a patient's name, address, social security number, birthday, or gender.
  • 9. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: selecting a patient record from at least one health care database, wherein the at least one health care database includes at least one patient record, each patient record including a plurality of identification fields associated with a patient and at least one health care field, and wherein at least one subset of the identification fields associated with a patient uniquely identifies the patient;accessing a plurality of the identification fields included in the patient record, the accessed plurality of identification fields uniquely identifying the patient;concatenating, into a string, information from each of the accessed plurality of identification fields included in the patient record;generating an encrypted unique patient identifier by encrypting the concatenated string of information;generating a de-identified patient record, wherein the de-identified patient record includes the at least one health care field that is included in the selected patient record and the encrypted unique patient identifier, and wherein the de-identified patient record does not include any information that identifies the patient other than the encrypted unique patient identifier; andtransmitting the de-identified patient record to the second database.
  • 10. The computer-readable medium of claim 9, wherein the at least one health care field that is included in the selected patient record comprises pharmaceutical claims data, medical claims data, or hospital claims data.
  • 11. The computer-readable medium of claim 9, further comprising: identifying one or more records stored in the second database that include the encrypted unique patient identifier; andgenerating a report based on data included in the identified records.
  • 12. The computer-readable medium of claim 9, wherein the plurality of identification fields included in the selected patient record include one or more of a patient's name, address, social security number, birthday, or gender.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 09/665,752, filed on Sep. 20, 2000, which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/154,726, filed Sep. 20, 1999, the entireties of which applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (95)
Number Name Date Kind
3752904 Waterbury Aug 1973 A
3896266 Waterbury Jul 1975 A
4979832 Ritter Dec 1990 A
4993068 Piosenka et al. Feb 1991 A
5003539 Takemoto et al. Mar 1991 A
5005200 Fischer Apr 1991 A
5070452 Doyle, Jr. et al. Dec 1991 A
5214702 Fischer May 1993 A
5299121 Brill et al. Mar 1994 A
5301105 Cummings, Jr. Apr 1994 A
5325290 Cauffman et al. Jun 1994 A
5371797 Bocinsky, Jr. Dec 1994 A
5471382 Tallman et al. Nov 1995 A
5502764 Naccache Mar 1996 A
5581749 Hossain et al. Dec 1996 A
5606610 Johansson Feb 1997 A
5644778 Burks et al. Jul 1997 A
5652842 Siegrist, Jr. et al. Jul 1997 A
5664109 Johnson et al. Sep 1997 A
5666492 Rhodes et al. Sep 1997 A
5704044 Tarter et al. Dec 1997 A
5724575 Hoover et al. Mar 1998 A
5754938 Herz et al. May 1998 A
5758085 Kouoheris et al. May 1998 A
5758095 Albaum et al. May 1998 A
5787186 Schroeder Jul 1998 A
5793969 Kamentsky et al. Aug 1998 A
5799086 Sudia Aug 1998 A
5799308 Dixon Aug 1998 A
5821871 Benzler Oct 1998 A
5823948 Ross, Jr. et al. Oct 1998 A
5825906 Obata et al. Oct 1998 A
5832449 Cunningham Nov 1998 A
5867821 Ballantyne et al. Feb 1999 A
5876926 Beecham Mar 1999 A
5890129 Spurgeon Mar 1999 A
5907677 Glenn et al. May 1999 A
5915240 Karpf Jun 1999 A
5918208 Javitt Jun 1999 A
5920854 Kirsch et al. Jul 1999 A
5925810 McBroom Jul 1999 A
5956716 Kenner et al. Sep 1999 A
5961593 Gabber et al. Oct 1999 A
5970462 Reichert Oct 1999 A
5991731 Colon et al. Nov 1999 A
5995939 Berman et al. Nov 1999 A
6003006 Colella et al. Dec 1999 A
6012051 Sammon, Jr. et al. Jan 2000 A
6014631 Teagarden et al. Jan 2000 A
6018713 Coli et al. Jan 2000 A
6024287 Takai et al. Feb 2000 A
6079021 Abadi et al. Jun 2000 A
6085322 Romney et al. Jul 2000 A
6249768 Tulskie, Jr. et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266675 Evans et al. Jul 2001 B1
6302844 Walker et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317700 Bagne Nov 2001 B1
6341267 Taub Jan 2002 B1
6397224 Zubeldia et al. May 2002 B1
6421650 Goetz et al. Jul 2002 B1
6449621 Pettovello Sep 2002 B1
6496931 Rajchel et al. Dec 2002 B1
6654724 Rubin et al. Nov 2003 B1
6732113 Ober et al. May 2004 B1
6734886 Hagan et al. May 2004 B1
6915265 Johnson Jul 2005 B1
7184947 Matsuoka et al. Feb 2007 B2
7200578 Paltenghe et al. Apr 2007 B2
7309001 Banfield et al. Dec 2007 B2
7346521 Tolle et al. Mar 2008 B2
7376677 Ober et al. May 2008 B2
7386526 Chappel Jun 2008 B1
7428706 Hagan et al. Sep 2008 B2
7865376 Ober et al. Jan 2011 B2
8473452 Ober et al. Jun 2013 B1
20020073138 Gilbert et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020198473 Kumar et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030097358 Mendez May 2003 A1
20040088355 Hagan et al. May 2004 A1
20040199781 Erickson et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215981 Ricciardi et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050027564 Yantis Feb 2005 A1
20050065912 Cafrelli et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050114334 Ober et al. May 2005 A1
20050165623 Landi et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050234740 Krishnan et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050236474 Onuma et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050256740 Kohan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256741 Kohan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256742 Kohan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050268094 Kohan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060026156 Zuleba Feb 2006 A1
20080091474 Ober et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080147554 Stevens et al. Jun 2008 A1
20100114607 Kress et al. May 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (20)
Number Date Country
869637 Dec 2000 EP
1026603 Jan 2002 EP
6083847 Oct 1994 JP
H1021302 Jan 1998 JP
10254807 Sep 1998 JP
2000513463 Oct 2000 JP
2000514938 Nov 2000 JP
2007056989 Mar 2007 JP
2008147364 Jun 2008 JP
2010232811 Oct 2010 JP
2011525614 Sep 2011 JP
2011250165 Dec 2011 JP
2011238064 Jun 2013 JP
WO9515628 Jun 1995 WO
WO9641275 Dec 1996 WO
WO9642059 Dec 1996 WO
WO9802837 Jan 1998 WO
WO0077642 Dec 2000 WO
WO0118631 Mar 2001 WO
WO2007145010 Dec 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (28)
Entry
Chaudhuri Set al: “An Overview of Data Warehousing and OLAP Technology” Sigmod Record, Sigmod, New York, NY, US, vol. 26, No. 1, Mar. 1997, pp. 65-74, XP002193792, ISSN: 0163-5808.
Brannigan V M and Beier B R: “Patient privacy in the era of medical computer networks: a new paradigm for a new technology.” Proceedings of the Eighth World Congress on Medical Informatics, vol. 8, No. 1, Jul. 23, 1995-Jul. 27, 1995 pp. 640-643, XP009040274, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, ISSN: 1569-6332.
Quantin C et al: “How to ensure data security of an epidemiological follow-up: quality assessment of an anonymous record linkage procedure” International Journal of Medical Informatics, Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Shannon, IR, vol. 49, No. 1, Mar. 1998, pp. 117-122, XP004149470, ISSN: 1386-5056.
Anderson R J: “A security policy model for clinical information systems” Security and Privacy, 1996. Proceedings., 1996 IEEE Symposium on Oakland, CA, USA May 6-8, 1996, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc, US, May 6, 1996, pp. 30-43, XPOI064923, ISBN: 0-8186-7417-2.
Supplementary European Search Report dated Nov. 24, 2004 from EP 00 96 5216, 2 pages.
International Search Report dated Jan. 9, 2001 from PCT/US00/25818, 1 page.
J.D. Halamka, P. Szolovits, D. Rind, and C. Safran, A WWW Implementation of National Recommendations for Protecting Electronic Health Information, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 4, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1997, pp. 458-464.
R. Anderson, The DeCODE Proposal for an Icelandic Health Database, Oct. 20, 1998, pp. 1-12, www.decode.is.
H. Bouzelat, C. Quantin and L. Dusserre, Extraction and Anonymity Protocol of Medical File, Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Fall Symposium, 1996, pp. 323-327, AMIA, Inc.
K.R. Iversen and T.O. Grotan, Socio-technical aspects of the use of health related personal information for management and research, International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, vol. 43,1996, pp. 83-91, Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
A. Ohm and L. Ohno-Machado, Using Boolean reasoning to anonymize databases, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 15, 1999, pp. 235-254, Elsevier Science B.Y.
K. Kahl, G. Dickson, J. Kebisek and M. Powell, Bar code tracking system enhances record-and film-handling productivity, Top Health Rec Manage, vol. 12, No. 3, Mar. 1992, 1 pg., St.. Joseph's Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, PubMed-indexed for MEDLINE.
E. T. Carroll, S. Wright, and C. Zakoworotny, Securely Implementing Remote Access within Health Information Management, Journal of ANIMA, vol. 69, No. 3, Mar. 1995, pp. 46-49, copied from the National Library of Medicine.
Unique Health Identifier for Individuals, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, A White Paper, pp. 1-32, http://epic.org/privacy/medical/hhs-id-798.html.
Secure Hash Standard, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Aug. 1, 2002, pp. i-iv and 1-79, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication ISO-2 (+Change Notice to include SHA-224).
English Translation of Japanese Office Action for co-pending application, Reference No. B025547, Mailing No. 571403, Mailing Date: Aug. 10, 2010, Patent Application No. 2001-525614.
Why Clearinghouses Transmit Electronic Claims to Insurance Carriers, and Why the Service They Provide is Essential to Medical Practices, Electronic Claim Clearinghouses, MPM Soft, Practice Billing Software, pp. 1-7, www.mpmsoft.com/EDI/clearinghouse.htm, printed Jan. 5, 2009.
Physicians Who Perform Medical Procedures, From Direct Medical Data, 1 pg., www.DMDdata.com. 2010.
Physicians Treating Patients by Diagnostic Treatement Code ICD9, From Direct Medical Data, 1 pg., www.DMDdata.com, 2008.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, May 5, 2004, 5 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, Mar. 4, 2005, 6 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, Dec. 16, 2005, 4 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, Mar. 16, 2007, 7 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, Jan. 25, 2008, 7 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, Dec. 8, 2008, 8 pgs.
X. Thirion, R. Sambuc & J.L. San Marco, Epidemiology and anonymity: a new method, Rev. Epidém. Et. Santé Publ., 1988, pp. 36-42.
Dussere L., Quantin Co. & Bouzelat H., A One Way Public Key Cryptosystem for the Linkage of Nominal Files in Epidemiological Studies, Proceedings of the Eighth World Congress on Med. Informatics, 1995, pp. 644-647.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, Feb. 27, 2013, 13 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140040308 A1 Feb 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60154726 Sep 1999 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09665752 Sep 2000 US
Child 13925243 US