System and method for analyzing de-identified health care data

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9886558
  • Patent Number
    9,886,558
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 2, 2015
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 6, 2018
    7 years ago
Abstract
A system and method for creating a unique alias associated with an individual identified in a health care database such that health care data, and particularly pharmaceutical-related data, can be efficiently gathered and analyzed. The system has a first store for storing at least one record where each record includes a plurality of identification fields which when concatenated uniquely identify an individual, and at least one health care field corresponding to health care data associated with the individual. The system also has a second data store, and a processor. The processor selects a record of the first data store, then selects a subset of the plurality of identification fields within the selected record, and concatenates the selected subset of identification fields. Then the processor stores the concatenated identification fields in a record in the second store with at least one health care field from the selected record of the first data store.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention

The present invention generally relates to computer systems and databases. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for the gathering and analysis of health-care related data, and specifically the gathering and analysis of information regarding the use of pharmaceuticals by individuals. The present invention also relates to techniques for de-identifying the individuals from such pharmaceutical data, in order to maintain privacy.


2. Description of the Related Art

In the medical information field, pharmaceutical claims are processed on large computer systems which receive claims data for patients who have been prescribed one or more medications and have filed claims with insurance companies (or government entities) in order to have the claim paid by the company or entity. The claims data includes very specific details and attributes about the individuals making the claims. For example, attributes can include name, gender, birth date, address, medical diagnosis, specific drug prescribed, and other drugs the patient is using. Consequently, this data is very useful in assisting marketing research relative to usage of a specific drug and identifying various attributes that impact the usage.


The claims data is typically received at a data “clearinghouse” which can be a database for a specific insurance company or a larger database providing the claim processing service for many insurance companies. Moreover, the claims data that are produced by claimants include a significant amount of data, with millions of new claims being entered into the system each month. Several of the claims data clearinghouses have systems handling many terabytes of claims data. Because of the large size of the data being produced and the large amount of attributes, the data is in an inadequate format for efficient search, retrieval and analysis of specific attributes.


Recently, there have been laws passed that prevent the transmission of personal information associated with individuals, within health care claims data. This legislation particularly prohibits the transfer of specific personal data such as names, addresses and social security numbers. Thus, the claims data is no longer allowed to be transmitted from the clearinghouse to others in raw form with the personal data. Without the personal information to segregate the claims data, it becomes much harder to generate valuable research and market data based upon the unique attributes for specific individuals, such as age, gender and geographic distribution.


It is therefore desirous to provide the ability to efficiently gather information from the claims databases to allow research and analysis of the attributes that effect the pharmaceutical industry. Accordingly, the present invention is primarily directed to systems and methods for overcoming the problems discussed above, as well as related limitations of the prior art.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to a system and method for creating a unique alias associated with an individual identified in a health care database, that allows the aggregation of segregated data for marketing research. The system may include a first data store for storing at least one record where each record has a plurality of identification fields, such as name and birth date, which when concatenated uniquely identify an individual, and at least one health care field corresponding to health care data associated with the individual, such as a medication type. The system may also have a second data store and a processor that selects a record of the first data store, selects a subset of the plurality of identification fields within the selected record, concatenates the selected subset of identification fields, and stores the concatenated identification fields in a record in the second data store along with at least one health care field from the selected record of the first data store. The first data store and the second data store can either be located within the same database or in separate databases.


The health care data stored within the first data store may, in one embodiment, correspond to pharmaceutical claims data. The selected subset may correspond to a specific person in the healthcare database, and the person's last name, birthday, and gender are concatenated to form a unique identifier for that record. The processor may analyze longitudinal and historical records of individuals using individual-level linking methodologies based on the concatenated identification fields and the at least one health care field of each record of the second data store. The health care data also can have personal data removed from the various records such that only medically significant information remains, and the identifier allows the medical information to be segregated such that the individual records are still identifiable.


In order to more efficiently process the tremendous amount of data of the health care records, the processor may perform the further steps of selectively gathering the records from the first data store and selectively manipulating the records into a data cube. The records of the first data store are typically in tabular form, and the process of manipulating the records comprises selectively joining and projecting records from the various tabular records in the first data store to ultimately form a data cube comprised of a table of records. The data cube format allows the processor to more easily perform a search of the health care records, and also generate a report by displaying the records 25 of a specific data cube.


The present invention thus provides a method for creating a unique alias associated with an individual identified in a health care database, wherein the health care database stores at least one record, and each record has a plurality of identification fields which when taken together uniquely identify an individual, and at least one health care field may correspond to health care data associated with the individual. The method includes the steps of selecting a record within the health care database, selecting a subset of the plurality of identification fields within the selected record, concatenating the selected subset of identification fields, and storing the concatenated identification fields in a record in a second database with the at least one health care field from the selected record of the first data store. The method preferably includes the step of analyzing longitudinal, historical records of individuals using individual level linking methodologies based on the concatenated identification fields and the at least one health care field of each record of the second database.


The step of selecting a record within the health care database may comprise selecting a record from pharmaceutical claims data. Further, the step of concatenating the selected subset of identification fields may comprise, for example, concatenating, for a specific person in the healthcare database, that person's last name, birthday, and gender. Thus, based on the concatenated identification fields and the at least one health care field of each record of the second data store, the method may include the step of analyzing longitudinal, historical records of individuals using individual-level linking methodologies.


As discussed above, the method further may include the steps of selectively gathering the records from the first data store, and selectively manipulating the records into a data cube. The step of selecting a record within the health care database may comprise selecting records of the first data store that are in tabular form, and the step of selectively manipulating the records into a data cube may comprise selectively joining and projecting records from the first data store and creating a data cube comprising a table of records.


The data cube allows the present system to aggregate the records in an efficient format such that all new records can be viewed shortly after posting. Further, the unique population identifiers allow users to follow patients over time yielding important results unavailable in other databases, such as patient drug switching behavior. By linking medical and pharmacy transactions at the patient level, new insights such as indication specific use of drugs and patient comorbidities can be determined.


The report displayed by the system may contain several attributes, such as: market shares geographic information at the national, regional, state and MSA levels; trends over time including annual, quarterly, monthly, and weekly periods; traditional measures such as total, new and refilled prescription counts; source of business such as new prescription starts, switches, and continuing patients; prescriber specialty; patient demographics for age and gender; indication specific use; and patient comorbidities. The system can therefore be used in a number of ways to help make business decisions, such as monitoring new drug launches and marketing campaigns, enhanced sales force targeting, and micro-marketing in select geographic areas or to select customers. Furthermore, the system can be used for forecasting and development of a pharmaceutical marketing strategy including indication-specific product positioning, early warning market share shifts, clinical trial site selection, investigator recruiting, and accurate intelligence on market size and demand.


Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the drawings, detailed description of the invention, and the claims, below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D and 1E are block and flow diagrams showing the overall structure and overall flow of the present invention in one embodiment.



FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 2C are block and flow diagrams showing the overall structure and overall flow of the present invention in one embodiment.



FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C illustrate a flow and relationship diagram, showing the overall flow and data relationship of the present invention.



FIG. 4 illustrates the operation of the Daily Rx Load Process of the present invention.



FIG. 5 illustrates the operation of the Monthly Mx Load Process of the present invention.



FIG. 6 illustrates the operation of the Monthly Hx Load Process of the present invention.



FIG. 7 illustrates the operation of Quarter Monthly Rx Merge Process of the present invention.



FIG. 8 illustrates the operation of the Prepare Mx Data Process of the present invention.



FIG. 9 illustrates the operation of the Produce Patient Data Process of the present invention.



FIG. 9A illustrates the operation of the RSTRANSFORMER process of the present invention.



FIG. 10 illustrates the operation of the Pull Cube Data Process of the present invention.



FIG. 11 illustrates the operation of the Generate TC Cube Data Process of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

With reference to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements throughout, FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 2A, 2B, and 2C illustrate a high-level combined block/flow diagram for the present invention. These figures represent both the elements of a block diagram for, as well as the steps performed by the system of, the present invention.


Referring to FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 2A, 2B, and 2C, the primary processing that takes place in the present invention may be performed by, for example, a high-performance computing system, such as a Sun Microsystems ES10000 computer (at SITE 2). On a periodic basis, such as each day, seven days per week, a computing system at SITE 1 places healthcare claims data at step 103 via a secure connection 190 onto a computer system at SITE 1. This healthcare claims data may include, for example, pharmaceutical, 20 medical, and hospital claims 101 that have been “de-identified” at step 102 (explained in further detail below).


The claims data is de-identified at step 102 before it is sent to SITE 2, which includes applying a unique identifier, encrypting this identifier, and removing specific patient identifying fields. Data is then loaded into database tables (such as an Oracle database) at step 104 that also reside on SITE 2. At step 105, SITE 2 runs all processes for analyzing and consolidating the data and for transforming the resulting Oracle tables into OLAP cubes.


The cube building process may run on a different computer (such as SITE 2). Cubes are modeled using an OLAP product on a desktop computer under, for example, the Windows NT operating system.


The cube deployment process may run on a different computer (such as SITE 3). A computing system at SITE 2 places cubes and metadata files at step 106 via a secure connection to SITE 3. Processes run at step 107 at SITE 3 to place the cube on the production web site and to update the web site pages with the associated metadata.


The present process performed at SITE 2 after obtaining data from the SITE 1 computer, making data ready for cube transformers, and then displaying it on the web 5 at SITE 3 can be logically divided into six major steps, as shown in FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C.

    • 1. Load Oracle Tables (step 301)
    • 2. Produce Patient Data (step 302)
    • 3. Pull Cube Data (step 303)
    • 4. Generate Cube Data (step 304)
    • 5. Build Cube (step 305)
    • 6. Automated Cube Deployment and Metadata Update Process


All these processes are handled, maintained and executed at regular daily, weekly and monthly intervals. There are some processes which are done out of the routine process, such as generation of DOI, zip-state-region, ICD9, etc. tables. FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C show a high level overview of the processes used to create cubes.


1. Load Oracle Tables (Step 301)


The Load Oracle Tables process (step 301) can be divided into two logically different steps, daily and monthly processes, described in further detail below with respect to FIGS. 4-8. The daily routines convert the text format data supplied from SITE 1 into “RX” and “‘Do Not Use Company Name (DNU)” daily Oracle tables. The monthly processes convert Hospital (HX) and Medical (MX) data into monthly Oracle tables. Note that all run times provided below correspond to approximate run times.


1.1 Daily Rx Load Process 401


The Daily Rx Load Process 401 is described below with respect to FIG. 4:


















Script Use
Loaddaily.sh is the unix shell script that uses




the SQL Loader Rx Control File to Convert




the Rx Text File from SITE 1 into




LOAD_YYYYMMDD, {DNU}_YYYY MMDD




Oracle tables after doing all the




necessary number, char and date




conversions. The {DNU} list




contains BLUFFCREEK, KROGER,




OMNI, PCN, VIP and WALGREENS.



Input
YYYYMMDD.synergy.log.gz,




RX Control file, YYYYMMDD.ctl.



Output
LOAD_19991123, 24 etc. tables for each day




of a month.




WALGREENS_YYYYMMDD etc. tables for




each DNU company.




../log/YYYYMMDD.log




../data.YYYYMMDD.synergy.log




../bad/YYYYMMDD.synergy.bad




../discard/YYYYMMDD.synergy.discard.



Frequency
Daily



Run Time
~4 hours










1.2 Monthly Mx Load Process 501


The Monthly Mx Load Process 501 is described below with respect to FIG. 5:















Script Use
SQL LOADER process reads MXDaily.MMDDYY text



file and control file to convert it into



LOAD_MX_YYYYMM tables.


Input
/raid/4011/envoydata/mx/oct1999/data/MXDaily. 100199



MX Control file, yyyymmdd.ctl.


Output
LOAD_MX_YYYYMM table


Frequency
Monthly


Run Time
~8 hours









1.3 Load HX Text Data 601


The Load HX Text Data Process 601 is described below with respect to FIG. 6:















Script Use
SQL LOADER process reads MX text file and Control



File to convert it into WH_ENVOY_HX_SEP99 tables.


Input
/raid/4011/envoydata/hx/sep1999/data/



MCDS.DPRET60.090199, HX Control file, yyyymmdd.ctl.


Output
WH_ENVOY_HX_SEP99_10..20..30..36..40..46..50..



60..61..66..70..80..90 tables for HX.


Frequency
Monthly


Run Time
~8 hours









1.4 Quarter-Monthly Rx Merge 701


The Quarter-Monthly Rx Merge Process 701 is described below with respect to FIG. 7:















Script Use
This process uses RX_Weekly_New.sql SQL script



to combine all the daily (approx.. 8 days



of tables) RX and DNU tables into



quarter-monthly tables.


Input
LOAD_19991123..24 etc. tables for each day of a month



WALGREENS_YYYYMMDD etc. tables for each “DNU”



company


Output
WH_ENVOY_9911A..B..C..D etc. 4 tables for a month.



WALGREENS_9911A..B..C..D like tables for each “DNU”



company for a month.


Frequency
Monthly


Run Time
~6 hours









1.5 Prepare Mx Data (801)


The Prepare mx Data Process 801 is described below with respect to FIG. 8:















Script Use
This process uses Process_Monthly_MX.sql SQL script to



validate and convert LOAD_MX_YYYYMM table data into



required date, char and numbers.


Input
LOAD_MX_YYYYMM,



WHREF_DONOT_USE_MX


Output
WH_ENVOY_YYYYMM



BAD_PAYER_ID_YYYYMM


Frequency
Monthly


Run Time










2. Produce Patient Data (Step 302)


The Produce Patient Data Process of step 302 (FIG. 3B) is described below in further detail with respect to FIG. 9:


















Script Use
This process uses Master_PXpgmv1b_9910.sql SQL




script to combine weekly RX and monthly MX,




HX tables to create a relational




WHREF_ENVOY_PXYYMM table.



Input
WH_ENVOY_YYMMA..B etc.,




WH_ENVOY_MX_YYYYMM,




WH_ENVOY_HX_MMMYY_20 tables.



Output
WHREF_PATIENT REPOSITORY RXMM,




WHREF_MXTEMP_YYMM,




WHREF_HXTEMP_YYMM,




WHREF_ENVOY_PXYYMM tables.



Frequency
Monthly



Run Time
~13 hours











3. Pull Cube Data (Step 303)


The Produce Patient Data Process of step 303 (FIG. 3B) is described below in further detail with respect to FIG. 10:


This process uses a series of Oracle stored procedures to allow for error checking and audit logging. Logging for these procedures uses the MM_LOG table. These stored procedures are called from the Unix shell using shell script wrappers that input the necessary variable values. The stored procedures used are as follows:

    • mm00_init
    • mm01_set_vars
    • mm02_weekly_data_pull
    • mm03_memids
    • mm04_mx_diags


3.1 Audit Logging in Oracle Table MM_LOG


Structure of the MM_LOG Table.



















RUN_
START_
STOP_
CUBE_

RETURN_
ERROR_



DATE
TIME
TIME
NAME
PROCESS
CODE
CODE
DESCR







10 Jul.
8:26:37
 8:26:38

mm00_init( )
0
Completed
Procedure mm00_init( )


2000






completed successfully


10 Jul.
8:26:38
 8:26:38

mm01_set_vars( )
0
Completed
Procedure mm01_set_vars( )


2000






completed successfully


11 Jul.
8:26:38
12:35:49

mm02_weekly_data_pull( )
0
Completed
Procedure mm02_weekly_data_


2000






pull( ) completed successfully.


11 Jul.
2:04:59
12:11:57

mm03_memids( )
0
Completed
Procedure m03_memids( )


2000






completed successfully


11 Jul.
1:07:32
11:23:46

mm04_mx_diags( )
1
−904
ORA-00904: invalid


2000






column name









A record is added to MM_LOG for each process. The name of the process is in the PROCESS column. For cube specific processes, the name of the cube is in the CUBE_NAME column. When a process successfully completes, the RETURN_CODE column contains a 0; when there is an error, the RETURN_CODE column contains a 1.


3.2 Initialization















Script Use
The mm00_init procedure initializes the



environment for weekly Market



Monitory cube processing. The mmOO.sh shell



script calls the mm00_init procedure.


Input
None


Output
MM_LOG table truncated.



MM_VARS table truncated.



CUBE_DATA_TEXT table truncated.



MM_LOG table - row inserted showing successful



completion or error condition.









3.3 Set Variables















Script Use
The mm01_set_vars procedure sets variables for the Rx Market Monitor



weekly cube processing. The mm01.sh shell script calls the



mm01_set_vars procedure with input variables set as text. The



mm00_init procedure must already have been run.









Input
p_run_date
Run date of pull as text ‘YYYYMMDD’.



p_start_date
Start date of pull as text ‘YYYYMMDD’.



p_end_date
End date of pull as text ‘YYYYMMDD’.



p_post_date
Post date of pull as text ‘YYYYMMDD.



p_acute_lookback
Acute lookback date as text ‘YYYYMMDD’.



p_chronic_lookback
Chronic lookback date as text ‘YYYYMMDD’′.








Output
MM_VARS table - row inserted with this week's values as DATE datatype.



MM_VARS_HIST table-row inserted with this week's values as DATE datatype.



MM_LOG-row inserted showing successful completion or error condition.









3.4 Pull Weekly Data















Script Use
The mm02_weekly_data_pull procedure pulls one week of Rx



data for weekly Rx Market Monitor cube processing. The



mm02.sh shell script calls this procedure with the tablespace



variable input set. The mm00_init and mm01_set_vars



procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.









MM_VARS table



WH_ENVOY_YYMM where YYMM is the two character year



and month from start_date in MM_VARS table.



WWW_MASTER_DOI


Output
Last week's WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL table is renamed to



WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL_YYYYMMDD where



YYYYMMDD is one day before the start_date in MM_VARS



table.



New WEB-DATA-WEEK-PULL table is created in the WEB



schema in the tablespace named in the p_tablespace parameter.



The WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL table contains Rx data from



the start and end dates in the MM_VARS table.



MM_LOG - a row is inserted to indicate either successful



completion or error condition.









3.5 Get Memids















Script Use
The mm03_memids procedure accumulates six weeks of



memids. The mm03.sh shell script calls this procedure and



inputs the tablespace parameter. The mm00_init,



mm01_set_vars, and mm02_weekly_data_pull procedures



must already have been run.









Input
p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.









MM_VARS table



ALL_MEM_TO CONVERT table



WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_V2_MONDD table where MONDD



is the end_date from MM_VARS table as text.



WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_V2_MONDD[1-5] tables



whereMONDD[1-5] are the previous five weeks of data.



RXMEMID SEQ table


Output
WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_V2_MONDD table is created where



MONDD is start_date in MM_VARS table minus one day.



WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_PULL is created with data for current



week and previous 5 weeks.



MM_LOG - a row is inserted to indicate either successful



completion or error condition.









3.6 Get Mx Diagnoses















Script Use
The mm04_mx_diags procedure gets diagnoses information



from Mx tables for weekly processing. The mm04.sh



shell script executes this procedure with the tablespace



input variable set. The mm00_init, mm01_set_vars,



mm02_weekly_data_pull, and mm03_memids



procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.









MM_VARS table



WEB_UMEMS_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



MASTER PX table



WEB_MXPTS_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



WH_ENVOY_MX_YYYYMM[1-3] tables where



YYYYMM[1-3] are the current month and two



prior months of data.



WEB_RXMX_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



RXMEMID_SEQ table


Output
ACUTE_RXMX table - records from the week are



appended.



CHRONIC_RXMX table- records from the week



are appended.



MM_LOG table - row inserted to indicate either



successful completion or error condition.










4. Generate TC Cube Data (Step 304)


The Generate TC Cube Data Process of step 304 (FIG. 3C) is described below in further detail with respect to FIG. 11:


The Generate TC Cube Data Process 304 uses three Oracle stored procedures to generate a cube table which will be further used by data transformers to build a COGNOS readable multi-dimensional formatted cube structure. The last stored procedure updates statistics for each cube. The stored procedures are as follows:

    • mm05_step1
    • mm06_step2
    • mm07_step3
    • mm08_cube_metadata


4.1 Process Step 1101 (Step 1)















Script Use
The mm05_step1 procedure must be run for each



therapeutic class. This procedure inserts records into the



CMID_V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the



p_class specified. The mm00_init, mm01_set_vars,



mm02_weekly_data_pull, mm03_memids, and



mm04_mx_diags procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_class
Class name.



p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.



p_lookback
Number of days of lookback



p_condition
“ACUTE” or “CHRONIC”









MM_VARS table



WEB_DATA_WEEK_PULL_V2 table



CUBE_V2_LIST table



CMID_V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the p_class.


Output
Records inserted into CMID_V2_CLASS table



where CLASS is the p_class.



New CMID_V2_CLASS_TMP table is created



where CLASS is the p_class.



MM_LOG table- row inserted to indicate either



successful completion or error condition.









4.2 Process Step 1102 (Step 2)















Script Use
The mm06_step2 procedure must be run for each



therapeutic class. This procedure inserts records



into the RX_RESULT_V2_CLASS table where



CLASS is the p_class



specified when the procedure is called. The mm00_init,



mm01_set_vars, mm02_weekly_data_pull, mm03_memids,



mm04_mx_diags, and mm05_step1 procedures must



already have been run.









Input
p_class
Class name.



p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.



p_lookback
Number of days of look back



p_condition
“ACUTE” or “CHRONIC”









MM_VARS table



CMID_V2_CLASS_TMP table where CLASS



is the p_class.



CMID_V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the p_class.



RX_RESULT_TEMP_CLASS table where CLASS



is the p_class.



ZIP_ST_MSA_REG_DIV table



WEB_DEA_TO_SPEC_U


Output
New records are inserted into RX_RESULT_V2_CLASS



where CLASS is p_class.



MM_LOG table - row inserted to indicate either



successful completion or error condition.









4.3 Process Step 1103 (Step 3)















Script Use
The mm07 step3 procedure must be run for each



therapeutic class. This procedure creates a new



RXMX_CUBE_V2_CLASS table where class is



the p_class specified. The mm00_init, mm01_set_vars,



mm02_weekly_data_pull, mm03_memids,



mm04_mx_diags, mm05_step1, and mm06_step2



procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_class
Class name.



p_tablespace
Tablespace name as text.



p_lookback
Number of days of lookback



p condition
“ACUTE” or “CHRONIC”









RXMX_CONDITION_V2 table where CONDITION



is the p_condition.



RX_RESULT_V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the p_class.



ICD9 V2_CLASS table where CLASS is the p_class.



RX_RESULT_V2_CLASS_M table where



CLASS is the p_class.


Output
New RXMX_CUBE_V2_CLASS table is



created where CLASS is p_class.



MM_LOG table - row inserted to indicate either



successful completion or error condition.









4.4 Generate Cube Metadata















Script Use
The mm08 cube_metadata procedure must be run for



each therapeutic class. This procedure updates the



CUBE_DATA table for each cube. The mm00_init,



mm01_set_vars, mm02_weekly_data_pull, mm03_memids,



mm04_mx_diags, mm05_step1, mm06_step2 and



mm07 step3 procedures must already have been run.









Input
p_class
Class name.









MM_VARS table



CUBE_DATA table where CLASS is the p_class.


Output
CUBE_DATA_TEXT table is appended where



CLASS is p_class.



MM_LOG table - row inserted to indicate either



successful completion or error condition










5. Build Cube (Step 305)


The Build Cube Process of step 305 (FIG. 3C) is described below in further detail with respect to FIG. 9A:


This process uses a C program to create a cube for each therapeutic class. Each cube is FTP'd to the server of SITE 3. Metadata for each cube is spooled to a text file and FTP'd to the SITE 3 server. The same text files may be concatenated and sent via email to the web developer of SITE 2.


5.1 Build Cube


















Script Use
The program RSSERVER is repeated for each of




the therapeutic classes and called by




the script mmv2_ 'class name' .sh.




Data Transformers uses Model Structure and




OBES_RX_CUBE




Oracle table (built in above process) to finally




build a CUBE for each of the




therapeutic class. This Cube is then used by




COGNOS to show requested information




on the Web.



Input
OBES_RXMX_CUBE



Output
Cube for a OBES Class



Frequency
On Request



Run Time
~8 hours










5.2 FTP Cube to SITE 3 Server


















Script Use
The transfer_mm_cube.sh script renames




a cube and puts a copy into directory /raid4011/




cubes/transfer where it will




automatically be FTP’d to the SITE 3 server.




This script is run in parallel for each class




(class corresponds to cube).










5.3 Approve Cube















Script Use
The approve_cube script is run manually for each cube



after quality assurance has been performed. This script



is run in parallel for each class (class responds to cube).









5.4 Create Metadata Text File/FTP to SITE 3 Server















Script Use
The process gen_mm_file.sql is called by gen_mm_file.sh



to spool metadata for a cube to a text file. The text file is



put into a directory where it is automatically FTP’d to the



SITE 3 server. This script is run in parallel for each class.



All procedures to pull cube data must have been



successfully completed and the metadata must exist in



the Oracle tables cube_data and cube_data_text.









5.5 E-Mail Metadata to Web Developer


















Script Use
The email_meta.sh script will e-mail metadata




to a SITE 2 Web Developer. This script is run in




parallel for each class (class corresponds to cube).











6. Automated Cube Deployment and MetaData Update Process


Automated processes exist on the OnLine Analytical Processing (OLAP) host machine to deploy data cubes (such as QUINTERNET™ Series, from Quintiles Transnational Corp.) to the production web site, cubes ready for Quality Assurance (QA) verification, as well as to automatically update “metadata” on production web pages. This enables production cube deployments and web page updates to occur during off-peak hours without any manual intervention.


As a QUINTERNET™ Series data cube is created, the cube is sent via a secure connection to the host machine. The cube is then automatically “served up” to the QA location on the web, to which only authorized personnel have access.


For each cube approval, a “metadata” file is transmitted from the SITE 2 server, via a secure connection, to the host machine in a specific location (directory within a file system). This secure transmission may occur after a data cube has passed the QA verification.


The metadata file contains statistical information about the specific cube (e.g.—date that cube contains data through, number of records, number of patients, etc.). Several times each night, an automated process may be initiated which checks for the presence of a metadata file and a corresponding data cube file. If matching files for a specific cube exist, the process automatically “serves” up this cube into production for access via the web pages. In addition, the HTML page which contains the metadata for the cube is updated with the metadata contained in the metadata file.


The server at, for example, SITE 3 may prepare and maintain HTML template files for each QUINTERNET™ Series cube. These files contain the base HTML used to create each cube's web page. Instead of the actual metadata values that will populate the cubes' web pages, the HTML template files may contain placeholder tags. These placeholder tags are replaced by data values supplied by SITE 2 in metadata files.


SITE 2 transfers the template files and the metadata files to a host via FTP. The metadata files are transferred to the host each time a cube is approved. Template files are maintained for each QUINTERNET™ Series cube and are updated by SITE 2 as necessary so that a current version of each cube's template file is always available for processing on the host.


After a cube has been updated, reviewed for quality and approved by the operator of SITE 2, SITE 2 transfers a metadata file for that cube to the host via FTP. The metadata files contains the same tags found in the HTML template file for each cube. Each of these tags is coupled with a value that will be substituted for the placeholder tag in the HTML template file.


An event-driven file processing script runs periodically via cron, a unix scheduling system, on the host. If the file processing script detects the existence of a designated flag file, a script called enable_cube.ksh is run. The enable_cube.ksh script calls a Perl script, replaceHtmlMetaTags.pl, passing it the name of the cube being processed and the name of the related metadata file. The enable_cube.ksh script also updates the metadata file with a tag/value pair representing the date the updated cube is being deployed.


The purpose of the replaceHtmlMetaTags.pl script is to automatically generate HTML pages for the QUINTERNET™ Series products. The replaceHtmlMetaTags.pl script substitutes the values in the metadata file for the placeholder tags in the template and saves the resulting output in an HTML file. Referring to FIG. 1E, the enable_cube.ksh script then promotes the updated HTML file(s) to SITE 3's web server 181 thus making it available via, for example, the Internet 183, to users of web browsers 182 operating on client computers.


The present invention may be implemented with a processing schedule defined in many ways. For example, the schedule may be on a weekly or monthly basis, depending upon the needs of the implementation. At times, special requests may be required and the ability to process data and create cubes on an ad hoc basis exists.


While there has been shown the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is to be understood that certain changes can be made in the forms and arrangements of the elements of the system and the steps of the method without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as is set forth in the Claims.


A system for analyzing de-personalized health care data includes health care databases and a processor connected to the health care databases. The health care data bases each include at least one record, and each record includes a depersonalized yet unique patient identifier associated with a patient. The de-personalized patient identifier is common for a specific patient across several health care databases. According to one embodiment, the de-personalized health care data can be pharmaceutical claims data.


The processor performs the steps of: (i) receiving records from the health care databases; (ii) querying the records received from the health care databases, based upon selected person-level criteria; and (iii) generating at least one report based upon the results of the querying step. In another embodiment, the generating step performed by the processor can include the step of manipulating the results for display in specific views that satisfy specific analytical goals. In yet another embodiment, the generating step performed by the processor can include the step of displaying the report in a tabular format.


A method for analyzing de-personalized health care data within health care databases, wherein the health care databases each include at least one record. Each record includes a depersonalized yet unique patient identifier associated with a patient. The de-personalized patient identifier is common for a specific patient across the health care databases. According to one embodiment, the de-personalized health care data includes pharmaceutical claims data. The method includes the steps of: (a) receiving records from the health care databases; (b) querying the records received from the health care databases; and (c) generating at least one record based upon the results of the querying step. In one embodiment, the generating step includes the step of manipulating the results for display in specific views that satisfy specific analytical goals. In another embodiment, the generating step includes the step of displaying the report in a tabular format.

Claims
  • 1. A system for analyzing de-personalized health care data, comprising: (a) a plurality of health care databases, the plurality of health care databases each including at least one record, each record including a de-personalized yet unique patient identifier associated with a patient, whereby the de-personalized patient identifier is a common value identifying a specific patient across a plurality of health care databases that are associated with distinct database systems of different organizations;(b) one or more processors in communication with a first of the health care databases, and one or more storage devices storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: (i) receiving a new record from at least one of the plurality of healthcare databases, the new record comprising a plurality of identification fields uniquely identifying a patient associated with the new record;(ii) concatenating, into a combined textual representation, text from each of the accessed plurality of identification fields included in the new record,(iii) generating at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier associated with the patient by encrypting the concatenated text of the combined textual representation; and(iv) storing, in a first of the health care databases, at least a portion of the received new record in association with the least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier.
  • 2. A method for de-identifying health care data comprising: receiving a new record from at least one of a plurality of health care databases, the new record comprising a plurality of identification fields uniquely identifying a patient associated with the new record;concatenating, into a combined textual representation, text from each of the plurality of identification fields included in the new record,generating at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier associated with the patient by encrypting the concatenated text of the combined textual representation, the at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier representing a common value identifying the patient across a plurality of health care databases that are associated with distinct database systems of different organizations; andstoring, in a first of the health care databases, at least a portion of the received new record in association with the least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier.
  • 3. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving a new record from at least one of a plurality of health care databases, the new record comprising a plurality of identification fields uniquely identifying a patient associated with the new record;concatenating, into a combined textual representation, text from each of the plurality of identification fields included in the new record,generating at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier associated with the patient by encrypting the concatenated text of the combined textual representation, the at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier representing a common value identifying the patient across a plurality of health care databases that are associated with distinct database systems of different organizations; andstoring, in a first of the health care databases, at least a portion of the received new record in association with the least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of identification fields included in the new record comprise one or more of a patient's name, address, social security, contact number, date of birth, or gender.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors execute instructions that cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: identifying one or more records stored in the first of the health care databases that include the at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifiers; andgenerating a report based on data included in the identified one or more records.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the new record comprises one or more healthcare fields that include at least one of pharmaceutical claims data, medical claims data, or hospital claims data.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: removing, from the portion of the new record that is stored in associated with the at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier, information other than the at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifier that identifies the patient.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein: the plurality of identification fields comprises a patient last name field and a patient birthdate field; andconcatenating the text from each of the plurality of identification fields included in the new record comprises concatenating, into the combined textual representation, a first text segment corresponding to a value stored in the patient name field and a second text segment corresponding to a value stored in the patient birthdate field.
  • 9. The method of claim 2, wherein the plurality of identification fields included in the new record comprise one or more of a patient's name, address, social security, contact number, date of birth, or gender.
  • 10. The method of claim 2, comprising: identifying one or more records stored in the first of the health care databases that include the at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifiers; andgenerating a report based on data included in the identified one or more records.
  • 11. The method of claim 2, wherein the new record comprises one or more healthcare fields that include at least one of pharmaceutical claims data, medical claims data, or hospital claims data.
  • 12. The computer-readable medium of claim 3, wherein the plurality of identification fields included in the new record comprise one or more of a patient's name, address, social security, contact number, date of birth, or gender.
  • 13. The computer-readable medium of claim 3, wherein the operations comprise: identifying one or more records stored in the first of the health care databases that include the at least one de-personalized yet unique patient identifiers; andgenerating a report based on data included in the identified one or more records.
  • 14. The computer-readable medium of claim 3, wherein the new record comprises one or more healthcare fields that include at least one of pharmaceutical claims data, medical claims data, or hospital claims data.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/925,243, filed on Jun. 24, 2013, which application is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 09/665,752, filed on Sep. 20, 2000, which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/154,726, filed Sep. 20, 1999, the entireties of which applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (269)
Number Name Date Kind
3752904 Waterbury Aug 1973 A
3896266 Waterbury Jul 1975 A
4823265 Nelson Apr 1989 A
4979832 Ritter Dec 1990 A
4992940 Dworkin Feb 1991 A
4993068 Piosenka et al. Feb 1991 A
5003539 Takemoto et al. Mar 1991 A
5005200 Fischer Apr 1991 A
5060263 Bosen et al. Oct 1991 A
5070452 Doyle, Jr. et al. Dec 1991 A
5084828 Kaufman et al. Jan 1992 A
5175681 Iwai et al. Dec 1992 A
5202982 Gramlich et al. Apr 1993 A
5214702 Fischer May 1993 A
5257369 Skeen et al. Oct 1993 A
5265247 Wienck et al. Nov 1993 A
5285494 Sprecher et al. Feb 1994 A
5293615 Amada Mar 1994 A
5295261 Simonetti Mar 1994 A
5297202 Kapp et al. Mar 1994 A
5299121 Brill et al. Mar 1994 A
5301105 Cummings, Jr. Apr 1994 A
5325290 Cauffman et al. Jun 1994 A
5331544 Lu et al. Jul 1994 A
5365589 Gutowitz Nov 1994 A
5371797 Bocinsky, Jr. Dec 1994 A
5403639 Belsan et al. Apr 1995 A
5410602 Finkelstein et al. Apr 1995 A
5420786 Felthauser et al. May 1995 A
5444823 Nguyen Aug 1995 A
5454101 Mackay et al. Sep 1995 A
5471382 Tallman et al. Nov 1995 A
5490060 Malec et al. Feb 1996 A
5497486 Stolfo et al. Mar 1996 A
5499293 Behram et al. Mar 1996 A
5502764 Naccache Mar 1996 A
5519607 Tawil May 1996 A
5526257 Lerner Jun 1996 A
5557518 Rosen Sep 1996 A
5557780 Edwards et al. Sep 1996 A
5560006 Layden et al. Sep 1996 A
5581749 Hossain et al. Dec 1996 A
5606610 Johansson Feb 1997 A
5615264 Kazmierczak et al. Mar 1997 A
5634016 Steadham, Jr. et al. May 1997 A
5644778 Burks et al. Jul 1997 A
5652842 Siegrist, Jr. et al. Jul 1997 A
5664109 Johnson et al. Sep 1997 A
5666492 Rhodes et al. Sep 1997 A
5680611 Rail et al. Oct 1997 A
5699428 McDonnal et al. Dec 1997 A
5704044 Tarter et al. Dec 1997 A
5708828 Coleman Jan 1998 A
5719938 Haas et al. Feb 1998 A
5721777 Blaze Feb 1998 A
5724575 Hoover et al. Mar 1998 A
5734838 Robinson et al. Mar 1998 A
5737539 Edelson et al. Apr 1998 A
5745899 Burrows Apr 1998 A
5748765 Takhar May 1998 A
5754938 Herz et al. May 1998 A
5758085 Kouoheris et al. May 1998 A
5758095 Albaum et al. May 1998 A
5758147 Chen et al. May 1998 A
5758355 Buchanan May 1998 A
5761500 Gallant et al. Jun 1998 A
5781893 Felthauser et al. Jul 1998 A
5784565 Lewine Jul 1998 A
5787186 Schroeder Jul 1998 A
5787435 Burrows Jul 1998 A
5793969 Kamentsky et al. Aug 1998 A
5794246 Sankaran et al. Aug 1998 A
5799086 Sudia Aug 1998 A
5799308 Dixon Aug 1998 A
5806074 Souder et al. Sep 1998 A
5809494 Nguyen Sep 1998 A
5818836 DuVal Oct 1998 A
5821871 Benzler Oct 1998 A
5823948 Ross, Jr. et al. Oct 1998 A
5825906 Obata et al. Oct 1998 A
5826240 Brockman et al. Oct 1998 A
5832449 Cunningham Nov 1998 A
5832494 Egger et al. Nov 1998 A
5845255 Mayaud Dec 1998 A
5845284 Robinson Dec 1998 A
5848373 DeLorme et al. Dec 1998 A
5852822 Srinivasan et al. Dec 1998 A
5867821 Ballantyne et al. Feb 1999 A
5870770 Wolfe Feb 1999 A
5876926 Beecham Mar 1999 A
5890129 Spurgeon Mar 1999 A
5890159 Rekieta et al. Mar 1999 A
5897641 Ruddy et al. Apr 1999 A
5897989 Beecham Apr 1999 A
5907677 Glenn et al. May 1999 A
5911132 Sloane Jun 1999 A
5915209 Lawrence Jun 1999 A
5915240 Karpf Jun 1999 A
5918208 Javitt Jun 1999 A
5920854 Kirsch et al. Jul 1999 A
5923754 Angelo et al. Jul 1999 A
5925810 McBroom Jul 1999 A
5930764 Melchione et al. Jul 1999 A
5937063 Davis Aug 1999 A
5940507 Cane et al. Aug 1999 A
5940835 Sit Aug 1999 A
5956400 Chaum et al. Sep 1999 A
5956716 Kenner et al. Sep 1999 A
5961593 Gabber et al. Oct 1999 A
5966695 Melchione et al. Oct 1999 A
5970462 Reichert Oct 1999 A
5970492 Nielsen Oct 1999 A
5978791 Farber et al. Nov 1999 A
5987448 Evans et al. Nov 1999 A
5987464 Schneider Nov 1999 A
5987572 Weidner Nov 1999 A
5991731 Colon et al. Nov 1999 A
5991751 Rivette et al. Nov 1999 A
5991758 Ellard Nov 1999 A
5991765 Vethe Nov 1999 A
5995939 Berman et al. Nov 1999 A
5999908 Abelow Dec 1999 A
6003006 Colella et al. Dec 1999 A
6012051 Sammon, Jr. et al. Jan 2000 A
6014631 Teagarden et al. Jan 2000 A
6018713 Coli et al. Jan 2000 A
6021200 Fischer Feb 2000 A
6024287 Takai et al. Feb 2000 A
6035306 Lowenthal et al. Mar 2000 A
6061658 Chou et al. May 2000 A
6073140 Morgan et al. Jun 2000 A
6078924 Ainsbury et al. Jun 2000 A
6079021 Abadi et al. Jun 2000 A
6085322 Romney et al. Jul 2000 A
6088717 Reed et al. Jul 2000 A
6101749 Inbar et al. Aug 2000 A
6148324 Ransom et al. Nov 2000 A
6195643 Maxwell Feb 2001 B1
6195661 Filepp et al. Feb 2001 B1
6226675 Meltzer et al. May 2001 B1
6249768 Tulskie, Jr. et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249769 Ruffin et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253203 O'Flaherty et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266675 Evans Jul 2001 B1
6285983 Jenkins Sep 2001 B1
6289111 Takhar Sep 2001 B1
6295608 Parkes et al. Sep 2001 B1
6302844 Walker Oct 2001 B1
6317700 Bagne Nov 2001 B1
6317834 Gennaro et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321201 Dahl Nov 2001 B1
6321205 Eder Nov 2001 B1
6330976 Dymetman et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336114 Garrison Jan 2002 B1
6341267 Taub Jan 2002 B1
6360324 Van Blarkom Mar 2002 B2
6363525 Dougherty et al. Mar 2002 B1
6397224 Zubeldia et al. May 2002 B1
6408263 Summers Jun 2002 B1
6415280 Farber et al. Jul 2002 B1
6421650 Goetz Jul 2002 B1
6430292 Ito et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434533 Fitzgerald Aug 2002 B1
6449621 Pettovello Sep 2002 B1
6473609 Schwartz et al. Oct 2002 B1
6496931 Rajchel et al. Dec 2002 B1
6523027 Underwood Feb 2003 B1
6523041 Morgan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6584472 Classen Jun 2003 B2
6598161 Kluttz et al. Jul 2003 B1
6654721 Handelman Nov 2003 B2
6654724 Rubin et al. Nov 2003 B1
6704739 Craft et al. Mar 2004 B2
6704740 Lang Mar 2004 B1
6704873 Underwood Mar 2004 B1
6708156 Von Gonten Mar 2004 B1
6732113 Ober et al. May 2004 B1
6734886 Hagan et al. May 2004 B1
6735399 Tabb et al. May 2004 B2
6782370 Stack Aug 2004 B1
6792412 Sullivan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6873979 Fishman et al. Mar 2005 B2
6874085 Koo et al. Mar 2005 B1
6915265 Johnson Jul 2005 B1
6934687 Papierniak et al. Aug 2005 B1
6938022 Singhal Aug 2005 B1
6988075 Hacker Jan 2006 B1
7016882 Afeyan et al. Mar 2006 B2
7092896 Delurgio et al. Aug 2006 B2
7127432 Rubin et al. Oct 2006 B2
7143289 Denning et al. Nov 2006 B2
7184947 Matsuoka et al. Feb 2007 B2
7200578 Paltenghe et al. Apr 2007 B2
7260215 Troyansky et al. Aug 2007 B2
7309001 Banfield et al. Dec 2007 B2
7346521 Tolle et al. Mar 2008 B2
7376677 Ober et al. May 2008 B2
7386526 Chappel Jun 2008 B1
7428706 Hagan et al. Sep 2008 B2
7577578 Linde et al. Aug 2009 B2
7668820 Zuleba Feb 2010 B2
7865376 Ober et al. Jan 2011 B2
7885882 Brander et al. Feb 2011 B1
8275850 Kohan et al. Sep 2012 B2
8473452 Ober et al. Jun 2013 B1
8930404 Ober et al. Jan 2015 B2
20010011247 O'Flaherty et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010019614 Madoukh Sep 2001 A1
20010027331 Thompson Oct 2001 A1
20010047281 Keresman, III et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020004900 Patel Jan 2002 A1
20020073099 Gilbert et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020073138 Gilbert et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080968 Olsson Jun 2002 A1
20020083192 Alisuag Jun 2002 A1
20020116615 Nguyen et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128860 Leveque et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020136407 Denning et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143794 Helt Oct 2002 A1
20020165736 Tolle et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020193905 Davison et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194024 Kleinschmidt Dec 2002 A1
20020194025 Notelovitz Dec 2002 A1
20020198473 Kumar et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030021417 Vasic et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030039362 Califano et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030041241 Saito Feb 2003 A1
20030046114 Davies et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030074564 Peterson Apr 2003 A1
20030081247 Sharma May 2003 A1
20030097358 Mendez May 2003 A1
20030120652 Tifft Jun 2003 A1
20040034550 Menschik et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040088355 Hagan et al. May 2004 A1
20040117215 Marchosky Jun 2004 A1
20040122726 Linde et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122792 Salazar Jun 2004 A1
20040143594 Kalies Jul 2004 A1
20040189707 Moore et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193905 Lirov et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199781 Erickson Oct 2004 A1
20040215981 Ricciardi et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050027564 Yantis Feb 2005 A1
20050065912 Cafrelli et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050114334 Ober et al. May 2005 A1
20050125317 Winkelman, III et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050147246 Agrawal et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165623 Landi et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050216313 Claud et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050234740 Krishnan et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234909 Bade et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050236474 Onuma et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050256740 Kohan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256741 Kohan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256742 Kohan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050268094 Kohan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288964 Lutzen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004656 Lee Jan 2006 A1
20060004739 Anthony et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026156 Zuleba Feb 2006 A1
20060059368 Fayad et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060178892 Oon Aug 2006 A1
20070073811 Rubin et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070282951 Selimis et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080091474 Ober et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080137860 Silvernail Jun 2008 A1
20080147554 Stevens et al. Jun 2008 A1
20100114607 Kress et al. May 2010 A1
20100217973 Kress et al. Aug 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (42)
Number Date Country
0770967 May 1997 EP
0869637 Oct 1998 EP
1026603 Aug 2000 EP
0884670 Apr 2002 EP
1253544 Oct 2002 EP
0732014 May 2003 EP
1321883 Feb 2004 EP
60-83847 Mar 1994 JP
7-56989 Jun 1995 JP
09-297795 Nov 1997 JP
10021302 Jan 1998 JP
10254807 Sep 1998 JP
11250165 Sep 1999 JP
2000513463 Oct 2000 JP
2000324094 Nov 2000 JP
2000514938 Nov 2000 JP
2001525614 Dec 2001 JP
2002032473 Jan 2002 JP
2003005645 Jan 2003 JP
2003173376 Jun 2003 JP
2008147364 Jun 2008 JP
2010232811 Oct 2010 JP
2011238064 Nov 2011 JP
1991005397 Apr 1991 WO
1995015628 Jun 1995 WO
1996041275 Dec 1996 WO
1996041288 Dec 1996 WO
1996042059 Dec 1996 WO
1997035271 Sep 1997 WO
1998002837 Jan 1998 WO
1998038910 Sep 1998 WO
1999037054 Jul 1999 WO
2000045317 Aug 2000 WO
2000077642 Dec 2000 WO
2001018631 Mar 2001 WO
2001018730 Mar 2001 WO
2001029692 Apr 2001 WO
2001039075 May 2001 WO
2001041353 Jun 2001 WO
2002063823 Aug 2002 WO
2004059555 Jul 2004 WO
2007145010 Dec 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (170)
Entry
Hefting, Robert and Barnes, Mike, Large Scale Database Scrubbing Using Object Oriented Software Components. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1998.
Hoffman, The Formulary Model for Flexible Privacy and Access Controls, 1971.
Holman et al., “Population-Based Linkage of Health Records in Western Australia: Development of a Health Services Research Linked Database”, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 23, No. 5, Oct. 1999.
IBM DB2 Universal Database, SQL Ref vol. 1 v 8.2 , 2004—833 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/US02/06268 dated Feb. 26, 2003.
International Search Report dated Feb. 6, 2007 in International Application No. PCT/US05/16094, 2 pages.
International Search Report of PCT/US00/25818.
J.D. Halamka, P. Szolovits, D. Rind, and C. Safran, A WWW Implementation of National Recommendationsa for Protecting Electronic Health Information, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 4, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1997, pp. 458-464.
Jaro, Matthew, Probabilistic Linkage of Large Public Health Data Files. Statistics in Medicine, vol. 14, 1995.
Jawade et al., Securing Anonymous and Confidential Database through Privacy Preserving Updates. International Journal of Applied Information Systems, 2013.
Joshi et al., ScalParC: A New Scalable and Efficient Parallel Classification Algorithm for Mining Large Datasets, Univ. of Minn. Supercomputing Inst. (UMSI 98/14), pp. 1-20, Feb. 1998.
K. Kahl, G. Dickson, J. Kebisek and M. Powell, Bar code tracking system enhances record - and film-handling productivity, Top Health Rec Manage, vol. 12, No. 3, Mar. 1992, 1 pg., St. Joseph's Hosoital, Milwaukee, WI, PubMed—indexed for MEDLINE.
K.R. Iversen and T.O. Grotan, Socio-technical aspects of the use of health related personal information for management and research, International journal of Bio-Medical Computing, vol. 43, 1996, pp. 83-91, Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
Keller et al., An Algorithm for Matching Anonymous Hospital Discharge Records Used in Occupational Disease Surveillance: Anonymous Record Matching Algorithm. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 20, 1991.
Kerkri, Elmostafa, et al., Application of the Medical Data Warehousing Architecture Epidware to Epidemiological Follow-Up: Data Extraction and Transformation. Medical Informatics Europe (1999).
Kohane, Isaac, et al., Health Information Identification and De-Identification Toolkit. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1998.
Kontzalis, Identification of key attributes, gap analysis and simulation techniques in forecasting market potential of ethical pharmaceutical products, International Journal of Forecasting 8 243-249, 1992.
Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 23, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,565.
Non-Final Rejection dated Apr. 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,564.
Non-Final Rejection dated Feb. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,589.
Non-Final Rejection dated Oct. 27, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,589.
Notice of Appeal filed May 12, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,565.
Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2015 from Australian Patent Application No. 2011250762, 4 pages.
Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2014 from Canadian Patent Application No. 2564313, 5 pages.
Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2015 from corresponding Canadian Patent Application No. 2,564,313, 3 pages.
Office Action dated May 11, 2015 from corresponding European Patent Application No. 05754019.7, 4 pages.
Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2014 from Australian Patent Application No. 2011250762, 3 pages.
Office Action in Australian Application No. 2011247850, dated Sep. 4, 2014, 4 pages.
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2564317, dated Aug. 20, 2013, 3 pages.
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2564317, dated Jul. 28, 2014, 3 pages.
Ohrn, Aleksander and Lucila Ohno-Machado, Using Boolean Reasoning to Anonymize Databases. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 15, 1999.
Oracle7 Release 7.3.4 Documentation Library (converted from htm files), 1997 (No Name)—2000 Pages.
Oracle7 Server Concepts Release 7.3, Feb. 1996—516 Pages.
Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Aug. 23, 2013 from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2011250762, 3 pages.
Perry et al., Understanding Oracle Chapters 1,11,14, 1989.
Physicians Who Perform Medical Procedures, From Direct Medical Data, 1 pg., www.DMDdata.com.
Pommerening et al., Pseudonyms for Cancer Registries, Methods of Information in Medicine 112-121, 1996.
Privacy Data: the Data Encryption Standard Provides Valuable Protection. U.S. General Accounting Office, Program Evaluation and Methodology Division, Transfer Paper 8, Mar. 1987.
Proceedings of the 1993 Public Health Conference on Records and Statistics, Jul. 19, 1993.
Quantin et al., A Computerized Record Hash Coding and Linkage Procedure to Warrant Epidemiological Follow-Up Data Security. Medical Informatics Europe, 1997.
Quantin et al., Automatic Record Hash Coding and Linkage for Epidemiological Follow-up Data Confidentiality, 37 Methods of Information in Medicine 271-277, 1998.
Quantin, C., et al., Irreversible Encryption Method by Generation of Polynomials Medical Informatics, vol. 21, No. 2, 1996.
R. Anderson, The DeCODE Proposal for an Icelandic Health Database, Oct. 20, 1998, pp. 1-12, www.decode.is.
R. J. Anderson, A security policy model for clinical information systems, Security and Privacy, 1996, Proceedings, 1996 IEEE Symposium on Oakland, CA, USA May 6-7, 1996 (May 6, 1996), pp. 30-43, XP010164923, ISBN: 0-8186-7417-2.
Rao et al., Forecasting with a Repeat Purchase Diffusion Model, Management Science vol. 34, No. 6 , 1988.
Record Linkage Techniques—1997, Proceedings of an International Workshop and Exposition, Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC (1997).
S. Chaudhuri, et al: An overview of Data Warehousing and OLAP Technology, Sigmod Record, Sigmod, New York, NY, US, vol. 26, No. 1, Mar. 1997, (Mar. 1997), pp. 65-74, XP002193792, ISSN: 0163-5808.
Samarati, Pierangela and Latanya, Sweeney, Generalizing Data to Provide Anonymity when Disclosing Information (1998).
Samarati, Pierangela and Latanya, Sweeney, Protecting Privacy when Disclosing Information: k-Anonymity and Its Enforcement through Generalization and Suppression (1998).
Scheuren et al., “HIPAA Certification for SD1's De-Identification Technology” Washington D.C. Jun. 4, 2007; oas. 1-24.
Secure Hash Standard, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Aug. 1, 2002, pp. i-iv and 1-79, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 180-2 (+Change Notice to include SHA-224).
Segev et al., A Framework for Join Pattern Indexing in Intelligent Database Systems, IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Eng'g, vol. 7, No. 6 at pp. 941-947, Dec. 1995.
Silk et al., Pre-Test-Market Evaluation of New Packaged Goods: A Model and Measurement Methodology. Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 15, Issue 2, May 1978.
Smith and Eloff, Security in Health-Care Information Systems—Current Trends. International Journal of Medical Informatics 54, 1999.
Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (HeinOnline 9th ed. 1799).
Spafford, Observing Reusable Password Choices, Jul. 31, 1992.
Spenser, W., The Health Information System (HIS). Computer Programs in Biomedicine 5, 1976.
Stanberry, Ben, The Legal and Ethical Aspects of Telemedicine 2: Data Protection, Security and European Law. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1998, Nov. 23, 1997.
Subramanian, Ashok, et al., Use of the World Wide Web for Multisite Data Collection. Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 4, No. 8, Aug. 1997.
Supplementary European Search Report of EP 00 96 5216.
Sweeney, Latanya, “Datafly: A System for Providing Anonymity in Medical Data” (1997).
Sweeney, Latanya, Guaranteeing Anonymity when Sharing Medical Data, the Datafly System (1997).
Sweeney, Latanya, Maintaining Patient Confidentiality when Sharing Medical Data Requires a Symbiotic Relationship between Technology and Policy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Working Paper No. AIWP-WP344b, May 1997.
Sweeney, Latanya, Replacing Personally-Identifying Information in Medical Records, the Scrub System. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1996.
Thelot, A general solution to the linkage of anonymous data. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, t. 310, Serie III, 1990.
Trusted Oracle7 Release 7.1, Discussion Forum Thread, Jan. 16, 2007.
Tsukagoshi, Noboru, “Ubiquitous computing and distribution system”, Magazine of “Logistic System”, Japan Logistics System Institute, Jan. 30, 2004, 13(2): 32-38.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, dated Feb. 27, 2013, 13 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, dated Dec. 8, 2008, 8 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, dated Jan. 25, 2008, 7 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, dated Mar. 16, 2007, 7 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, dated May 5, 2004, 5 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, dated Mar. 4, 2005, 6 pgs.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Officer, Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/665,752, dated Dec. 16, 2005, 4 pgs.
Unique Health Identifier for Individuals, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, A White Paper, DD. 1-32, http://epic.orq/privacv/medical/hhs-id-798.html.
Urban et al., Design and Marketing of New Products, 1993.
Urban et al., Prelaunch Forecasting of New Automobiles. Management Science, vol. 36, No. 4, Apr. 1990.
Urban et al., Premarket Forecasting of Really-New Products, 60 Journal of Marketing 47-60, 1996.
Claycamp et al., Simulation Techniques in the Analysis of Marketing Strategy, Applications of the Sciences in Marketing Management (1968).
Dalenius, Tore, and Steven Reiss, “Data Swapping—a Technique for Disclosure Control,” J. Statistical Planning and Inference, 1982, 6.1: 73-85.
Denning, “Field encryption and authentication,” Advances in Cryptology. Springer US, 1984.
Hamilton, Deborah, “Identification and Evaluation of the Security Requirements in Medican Application”, IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medican Systems, Jun. 1992, 12 pages.
HMS PxDx, Health Market Science, A Health Market Science Targeting Solution, 2008, 2 pgs., www.healthmarketscience.com.
Kotler, “Computer Simulation in the Analysis of New-Product Decisions,” Applications of the Sciences in Marketing Management, S (1968): 283-331.
Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2016 from Australian Patent Application No. 2015201415, 4 pages.
Pfleeger, “Security in Computing,” Prentice-Hall, 1989.
Physicians Treating Patients by Diagnostic Treatement Code ICD9, From Direct Medical Data, 1 pg., www.DMDdata. Com, 2008.
“Technology and Informatics 68, Medical Informatics Europe '99,” Edited by Kokol et al., Published 1999, 2 pages.
Ullman, Pfleeger, Principles of Database Systems, 2d Ed., 1982, pp. 216-219.
Wohlmacher and Pharow, “Applications in Health Care Using Public-Key Certificates and Attribute Certificates,” Computer Security Applications, 2000. ACSAC'00. 16th Annual Conference. IEEE, 2000.
“Person Identification Service (PIDS) (a.k.a. Patient Identification Service)”, OMG CORBAmed DTF, Feb. 12, 1998 (No Name).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,581 Jan. 21, 2010 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,581 Dec. 31, 2008 Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,581 May 29, 2009 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,581 Sep. 2, 2009 Final Office Action.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,589 Feb. 14, 2011 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,589 Aug. 13, 2010 Non-Final Office Action.
A. Ohrm and L. Ohno-Machado, Using Boolean reasoning to ananymize databases, Artificial intelligence in Medicine, vol. 15, 1999, DD. 235-254, Elsevier Science B.V.
Allen, Computers & Security, Trusted ORACLE—Multilevel Secure Data Management for Military Computing. vol. 70, Issue 3, pp. 271-275, May 1991.
Amendment and Response and Request for Continued Examination (RCE) filed Dec. 10, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,589.
Amendment and Response filed Apr. 6, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,589.
Amendment and Response filed May 27, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,589.
Amendment and Response filed Oct. 23, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,565.
Amstutz, Management, Computers, and Market Simulation, Applications of Management Sciences in Marketing, 1970, 14 pages.
Apr. 16, 2015 Patent Examination Report No. 5 from corresponding Australian Patent Application No. 2011250761, 3 pages.
Armstrong, Brief vs. comprehensive descriptions in measuring intentions to purchase. Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 8, Issue 1, Feb. 1, 1971.
Atkins et al., Pharmaceutical Marketing and Media. Automation in Pharmaceutical Marketing, 1968.
Balog, Sprinter Mod III: A Model for the Analysis of New Frequently Purchased Consumer Products. Operations Research, vol. 18, No. 5, Jul. 1966.
Berger, Andreas, “Privacy Protection for Public Directory Services”, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30, 1998.
Bertino and Foscoli, “Index Organizations for Object-Oriented Database Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 7, No. 2, Apr. 1995.
Blattberg et al., Tracker: An Early Test Market Forecasting and Diagnostic Model for New Product Planning. Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 15, Issue 2, May 1978.
Bobrowski, Mastering Oracle7 & Client-Server Computing , 1994.
Borking, John, et al., Privacy-Enhancing Technologies: the Path to Anonymity, vol. II. Registratiekamer, Netherlands, Aug. 1995.
Brandt et al., Anonymous and Verifiable Registration in Databases, May 1988.
Brice et al., Choice-Adapted Preference Modelling. 2000 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, 2000.
Business World, “Fighting to stay on top,” Manila, Dec. 11, 1996, p. 25 (four pages total).
C. Quantin, et al. How to ensure data security of an epidemiological follow up: quality assessment of an anonymous record linkage procedure, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Shannon, IR, vol. 49, No. 1, Mar. 1998 (Mar. 1998), pp. 117-122, XP004149470, ISSN: 1386-5056.
Chung, Yun-Chung, et al., Intrinsic Image Extraction from a Single Image. Journal of Information Science and Engineering 25, 1939-1953 (2009).
Claycamp et al., Prediction of New Product Performance: An Analytical Approach, VI Journal of Marketing Research 414-20, 1969.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Oct. 23, 2013 from corresponding European Patent Application No. 05 776 883.0, 6 pages.
Crosse, Marcia, et al., Medical Records Privacy, Access Needed for Health Research, but Oversight of Privacy Protections is Limited. U.S. General Accounting Office, Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO/HEHS-99-55, Feb. 24, 1999.
Dalrymple et al., Record Linkage in a Regional Mental Health Planning Study: Accuracy of Unique Identifiers, Reliability of Sociodemographics, and Estimating Identification Error. Journal of Mental Health Administration Thousand Oaks, vol. 21, Issue 2, 1994.
Denning, Cryptography and Data Security, 1982.
Dussere L., Quantin Co. & Bouzelat H., A One Way Public Key Crypto system for the Linkage of Nominal Files in Epidemiological Studies, Proceedings of the Eighth World Congress on Med. Informatics, 1995, pp. 644-647.
E.T. Carroll, S. Wright, C. Zakoworotny, Securely Implementing Remote Access within Health Information Management, Journal of AHIMA, vol. 69, No. 3, Mar. 1998, pp. 46-49, copied from the National Library of Medicine.
English Translation of Japanese Office Action for co-pending application, Reference No. B025547, Mailing No. 571403, Mailing Date: Aug. 10, 2010, Patent Application No. 2001-525614.
European Search Report dated Jul. 10, 2012 from EP Application No. 05 752 085.0, 6 pages.
Evans, Josie and Thomas MacDonald, Record-Linkage for Pharmacovigilance in Scotland. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 47, 1999.
Fair, M.E., Record Linkage in the National Dose Registry of Canada. European Journal of Cancer, vol. 33, Suppl. 3, 1997.
Final Rejection dated Jun. 10, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,589.
Final Rejection dated Nov. 12, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/122,565.
Gabrieli, Guide for Unique Healthcare Identifier Model. Journal of Clinical Computing, vol. 21, No. 5, 1993.
Gertz, ECS 289F Database Systems, Security in Commercial Database Systems Chap. 3, Lecture, 1998.
H. Bouzelat, C. Quantin and L. Dusserre, Extraction and Anonymity Protocol of Medical File, Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Fall Symposium, 1996, pp. 323-327, AMIA, Inc.
Hamburg et al., Computer Model for New Product Demand, Harvard Business Review 107-115, 1967.
Hamilton, Deborah, “Identification and Evaluation of the Security Requirements in Medican Application”, IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medican Systems.
Harvard Business School Case Study Johnson Wax: Enhance (A), revised Aug. 2, 1999.
Hauser et al., “Application of the “Defender” Consumer Model,” Marketing Science, 1984, 3(4):327-351.
Hauser et al., A Normative Methodology for Modeling Consumer Response to Innovation. Operations Research, vol. 25, No. 4, Jul. 1977.
Hauser et al., Application, Predictive Test, and Strategy Implications for a Dynamic Model of Consumer Response. Marketing Science, vol. 1, No. 2, 1982.
Hauser et al., Consumer Oriented Transportation Service Planning: Consumer Analysis and Strategies. Applications of Management Science, vol. 1, 1981.
Hauser et al., Dynamic Analysis of Consumer Response to Marketing Strategies. Management Science, vol. 28, No. 5, May 1982.
Kotz, David, Technological Implications for Privacy, Jan. 3, 1999.
Lawrenson et al., Clinical Information for Research; the Use of the General Practice Databases. Journal of Public Health Medicine, vol. 21, No. 3, (1999).
Lennon, Functional Magic-Tips and Tricks with Oracle 7 Stored Procedures, 1996.
Levi, Albert, Design and Performance Evaluation of the Nested Certification Scheme and Its Application in Public Key Infrastructures. Ph.D. Dissertation, 1999.
Lilien et al., Bayesian Estimation and Control of Detailing Effort in a Repeat Purchase Diffusion Environment. Management Science, vol. 27, No. 5, May 1981.
Lilien et al., Marketing Decision Making, A model-Building Approach, 1983.
Lilien et al., Marketing Engineering—Computer Assisted Marketing Analysis and Planning, 1998.
Lilien et al., Marketing Models, 1992.
Lowrance, William, “Privacy and Health Research” (1998).
Mahajan et al., Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, vol. 43, No. 4, 1979.
Max G. Arellano, MA, and Gerald I. Weber, PhD, “Issues in Identification and Linkage of Patient Records Across an Integrated Delivery System,” Journal of Healthcare Information Management, vol. 12, No. 3, Fall 1998.
McDonald, Clement et al., The Regenstrief Medical Record System: A Quarter Century Experience. International Journal of Medical Informatics 54, 1999.
Medical Radar International, Mar. 29, 1997.
Medical Radar, Guide to Success, Mar. 2, 1999.
Merkle, R. et al. “On the Security of Multiple Encryption” Communications of the ACM , vol. 24 No. 7, Jul. 1981, pp. 465-467.
Meux, Eleanor, Encrypting Personal Identifiers. Health Services Research 29:2, Jun. 1994.
Montgomery et al., Management Science in Marketing, 1969.
Muse et al., Evaluating the Quality of Anonymous Record Linkage Using Deterministic Procedures with the New York State AIDS Registry and a Hospital Discharge File. Statistics in Medicine, vol. 14, 1995.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Secure Hash Standard” Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 180-2 ( + Change Notice to include SHA-224), Aug. 1, 2002; pp. i-iv and 1-79.
Newswire, “CUNO Posts Record Results” New York, Dec. 11, 1997, p. 1 (seven pages total).
Nisbett et al., Telling More than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review, vol. 84, No. 3, May 1977.
Urban, Sprinter Mod III: A Model for the Analysis of New Frequently Purchased Consumer Products. Operations Research, vol. 18, No. 5, Sep. 1970.
V.M. Brannigan and B. R. Beier, Patient privacy in the era of medical computer networks: a new paradigm for a new technology, Proceedings of the Eighth World Congress on Medical Informatics, vol. 8, No. 8, Jul. 23, 1995 (Jul. 23, 1995), Jul. 27, 1995 (Jul. 27, 1995), pp. 640-643, XP009040274, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, ISSN: 1569-6332.
Valduriez, Join Indices, ACM Trans. on Database Sys., vol. 2, No. 2 at pp. 218, 246 (1987).
Vinod, ATMSIM: A Simulator for ATM Networks. Master's Thesis (Apr. 1995).
Why Clearinghouses Transmit Electronic Claims to Insurance Carriers, and Why the Service They Provide is Essential to Medical Practices, Electronic Claim Clearinghouses, MPM Soft, Practice Billing Software, pp. 1-7, www.mpmsoft.com/EDI/clearinghouse.htm, printed Jan. 5, 2009.
Wind et al., Courtyard by Marriott: Designing a Hotel Facility with Consumer-Based Marketing Models. Interfaces 19, Jan. 1989.
X. Thirion, R. Sambuc & J.L. San Marco, Epidemiology and anonymity: a new method, Rev. Epidem. Et. Sante Publ., 1988, pp. 36-42.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150112973 A1 Apr 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60154726 Sep 1999 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13925243 Jun 2013 US
Child 14588491 US
Parent 09665752 Sep 2000 US
Child 13925243 US