System and method for applying a reflectance modifying agent to change a person's appearance based on a digital image

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10163230
  • Patent Number
    10,163,230
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 6, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 25, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
A computer-controlled system determines attributes of a frexel, which is an area of human skin, and applies a reflectance modifying agent (RMA) at the pixel level to automatically change the appearance of human features based on one or more digital images. The change may be based on a digital image of the same frexel, for as seen in a prior digital photograph captured previously by the computer-controlled system. The system scans the frexel and uses feature recognition software to compare the person's current features in the frexel with that person's features in the digital image. It then calculates enhancements to the make the current features appear more like the features in the digital image, and it applies the RMA to the frexel to accomplish the enhancements. Or the change may be based on a digital image of another person, through the application of RMAs.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The current invention relates to automated computer-controlled methods to selectively and precisely apply one or more reflectance modifying agent, such as a dye or pigment, to human skin as cosmetics to change the appearance of human features based on a model comprising at least one digital image.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Prior Cosmetic Techniques and their Disadvantages


Prior art techniques for modifying the appearance of skin include natural tanning, artificial tanning, and the deliberate application of cosmetics. Each of these prior art techniques has limitations.


Typically, the applications of cosmetic substances to skin are largely manual, for example through the used of brushes, application tubes, pencils, pads, and fingers. These application methods make prior art cosmetics imprecise, labor intensive, expensive, and sometimes harmful, when compared to the computerized techniques of the present invention.


Most prior art cosmetic approaches are based on the application of opaque substances. As explained in the cross-referenced application U.S. Ser. No. 11/503,806, there is a need for the precise computer-controlled application of reflectance modifying agents (RMAs), such as transparent dyes, to provide a more effective modification of appearance. In this specification, the terms “reflectance modifying agent” or “RMA” refer to any compound useful for altering the reflectance of another material, and are explained in further detail below. Some examples of RMA are inks, dyes, pigments, bleaching agents, chemically altering agents, and other substances that can alter the reflectance of human skin and other features. The terms “dye” and “transparent dyes” are used for brevity in this specification to represent any RMA.


Moreover, cosmetics are typically applied manually to make people look more like certain images. For example, cosmetics may be applied to reconstruct the former appearance of people whose features have been altered or damaged. For example, cosmetics may be applied to the skin of patients who have been burned, to make the burned skin appear to have the color and texture it had before the burns. Cosmetics may be used to create the appearance of eyebrows on cancer patients who have lost their hair as a result of chemotherapy or radiation treatment. And cosmetics are used generally to make older people look more like they were when young. In addition, cosmetics may be used to make people look more like any desired model of themselves that they might have.


Typically the models used as the basis for these cosmetic applications are

    • People's memories of the way they looked previously.
    • Prior images of people, such as photographs, videos, paintings, drawings, and digital images such as those stored on computers, cell phones, and digital cameras.
    • Images of people as they would like to be seen, for example in drawings, enhanced photographs, or computer-generated images.


Ideal models derived from certain people are also used as the basis for cosmetic applications on other people. For example, a makeup artist may create a “look,” consisting of a certain combination of colors, shading contrasts, and even feature shapes, such as eyebrow shapes, that is used as model for cosmetics applied to many different people. Such a look may be based on the appearance of a popular actress, for example a Nicole Kidman look or a Catherine Zeta-Jones look, because many women would like to look like those actresses. Makeup artists can apply cosmetics to make different people all have a similar look, or individuals may apply their own cosmetics to create such effects, for example based on magazine pictures or digital images of actresses.


However, manual techniques of applying cosmetics for such changes based on images, such as digital images, can be time consuming and require considerable skill to be done well, as anyone can attest who has tried to draw on eyebrows for a distressed cancer patient to match a digital image of her.


Therefore, there is a need for the precise application of reflectance modifying agents (RMAs) to provide a more effective, more automated, faster, less expensive, and less dangerous modification of the appearance of skin to cosmetically change people's features based on digital images.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

These and other needs are addressed by the present invention. The following explanation describes the present invention by way of example and not by way of limitation.


It is an aspect of the present invention to automatically change the appearance of human features based on a model digital image.


It is another aspect of the present invention to automatically reconstruct the appearance of human features based on digital images, through the application of RMAs. A useful technique is to employ feature recognition software to compare a person's current features with that person's features in one or more digital images. These images may be previously provided by the present invention's system and method. Or they may be provided by other compatible means. The present invention's enhancement software can then determine reconstructive enhancements based on those digital images and can apply those enhancements to the person precisely and automatically.


It is still another aspect of the present invention to automatically enhance the appearance of a person's features based on a digital image of another person, through the application of RMAs. A useful technique is to employ feature recognition software to compare the person's features with a model person's features in one or more digital images. These images may be previously provided by the present invention's system and method. Or they may be provided by other compatible means. The present invention's software can then determine enhancements based on those digital images and can apply those enhancements to the person precisely and automatically.


These and other aspects, features, and advantages are achieved according to the system and method of the present invention. In accordance with the present invention, a computer-controlled system determines attributes of a frexel, which is an area of human skin, and applies a reflectance modifying agent (RMA) at the pixel level to automatically change the appearance of human features based on one or more digital images.


One embodiment may change the appearance of human features based on one or more digital images of the same frexel, as seen in a prior digital photograph. In an embodiment, the digital images are captured previously by the computer-controlled system. The system scans the frexel and uses feature recognition software to compare the person's current features in the frexel with that person's features in the digital images. It then calculates enhancements to the make the current features appear more like the features in the digital images, and it applies the RMA to the frexel, typically with an inkjet printer, to accomplish the enhancements. The identified attributes in the frexel may relate to reflectance characteristics and to the surface topology of the skin.


Another embodiment may enhance the appearance of a person's features based on a digital image of another person, through the application of RMAs. A useful technique is to employ feature recognition software to compare the person's features with a model person's features in one or more digital images. These images may be previously provided by the present invention's system and method. Or they may be provided by other compatible means. The present invention's software can then determine enhancements based on those digital images and can apply those enhancements to the person precisely and automatically.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following embodiment of the present invention is described by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram that illustrates an enhancement system for using a model digital image to change a person's appearance;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram that illustrates a reconstruction system comprising additional means of obtaining prior digital image;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram that illustrates a reconstruction system comprising additional means of obtaining prior digital images;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram that illustrates an enhancement system comprising additional means of obtaining a digital image of a second person;



FIG. 5 is a flow chart that illustrates a process for reconstructing the appearance of human features based on a digital image obtained through the present invention;



FIG. 6 is a flow chart that illustrates a process for reconstructing the appearance of human features based on a digital image obtained through another source than the present invention;



FIG. 7 is a flow chart that illustrates a process for automatically enhancing a person's appearance based on the appearance of a second person based on a digital image obtained through the present invention; and



FIG. 8 is a flow chart that illustrates a process for automatically enhancing a person's appearance based on the appearance of a second person based on a digital image obtained through another source than the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT—RECONSTRUCTION PROCESS

The present invention comprises the application or one or more reflectance modifying agents (RMAs) through a computer-controlled system and method to change a person's appearance. For example, the invention may be used to automatically reconstruct the appearance of a person's damaged or altered features, based on the appearance of that person in one or more digital images. To cite another example, the invention may be used to automatically enhance a first person's appearance based on the appearance of second person in a digital image.


U.S. application Ser. No. 11/503,806 filed Aug. 14, 2006 by the present applicants claims the computer-controlled system and method that scans an area of human skin, identifies unattractive attributes, and applies the RMA, typically with an inkjet printer, to improve the appearance of that area of skin. The present invention comprises new innovations to that system and method to accomplish the changes mentioned above.


Enhancement System



FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a system for changing the appearance of features using the cosmetic system explained with reference to FIG. 1 in the cross-referenced application U.S. Ser. No. 11/503,806. FIG. 1 in the present application shows the incorporation of the new element of at least one previously stored digital image 702 that is used as a model for changing a person's appearance.


Frexels


In this patent specification, the term “frexel” is defined as a small pixel-like region of the skin. A frexel might correspond to a small portion of a freckle or other skin feature, or it may correspond to an area of the skin that does not have special features. A frexel thus refers to skin rather than to an independent coordinate system. The term frexel is used to suggest that what is being measured is on a 3-D surface rather than a flat surface.


Reconstruction System



FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of a system for changing the appearance of features using the cosmetic system explained with reference to FIG. 48 in the cross-referenced application U.S. 60/889,297. In FIG. 2, the stored digital image 702 may be a previous digital image of a person whose feature or features are to be reconstructed. In an embodiment, this digital image 702 may be one obtained through the system and method of the present invention, so that it provides the appropriate data needed for reconstruction. As a result, compatible data may be obtained for the same frexel or frexels on a person at a current time and at a previous time and may be compared efficiently for reconstruction. This data may comprise reflectance and topographical data mapped for the same frexel and the same set of features contained in the frexel. Moreover it may be represented in the same data format, so that it may be easily used for reconstruction. This digital image 702 may represent a prior appearance of the person, for example from when the person was younger, healthier or otherwise more attractive.


If a patient's left eyebrow needs to be reconstructed, for example, a digital image 702 may be used that has been previously captured about that patient and stored in storage 250, and that shows the patient's left eyebrow. A woman who has stored a model digital image 702 of her face at age 20 may use that digital image 702 years later, for example when she is 50, as the basis for enhancements with RMAs throughout her face. The same woman could also choose to use as a basis for reconstruction a previous image of herself when she received a special makeup look from a professional makeup artist.


Topographic aspects of features can also be reconstructed to degrees. For example, dark hollows under eyes and below cheekbones can be lightened to make a face appear younger and healthier.


In another embodiment, multiple previous digital images of the person may be used to derive a digital image 702, useful for reconstruction, for example by averaging the relevant values of the multiple digital images. In addition, a current frexel may be reconstructed by using data from different but relevant frexels. For example, a frexel representing a point on a cheek may be reconstructed on the basis of previous images 702 showing adjacent frexels or frexels on different points of the body.


In still another embodiment, a computer display 102 (not shown) and interface 104 (not shown), for example a keyboard, may be used to allow a consumer to select a stored digital image 702, or elements from that image 702 or from multiple stored images, to derive a basis for one or more reconstructions, as will be evident to those skilled in the art.


In other embodiments, the digital image 702 may be created remotely and transferred to computing environment 100 by any method known to those skilled in the art or not yet known. For example, it may be sent over the Internet from a remote computer to computing environment 100. It may be loaded onto computing environment 100 by means of a diskette. It may also be transferred through wireless technology, as well as by many other means.


Alternate Embodiments of Reconstruction System


FIG. 3 illustrates other embodiments in which the system comprises means for incorporating images not created by the system and method of the present invention and not previously explained above, which can be used as bases for reconstruction.


In one embodiment, image receiving means 712 enable the application system 200, shown in FIG. 2, to receive at least one digital image 702 of the person whose appearance is to be reconstructed so that digital image 702 can be stored in storage 250. For example, the digital image 702 may be a scanned image made from a photograph, painting, drawing, or other form of image. Or it may a digitally created image, such as an image captured by a digital camera, cell phone, or video camera, or an image generated on a computer.


This digital image 702 may represent not only a prior appearance of the person but the way the person would like to be seen. For example, the person might want to look like his or her appearance in an idealized drawing, an enhanced photograph, or a computer-generated image. These idealized images may be created by the person or someone working on the person's behalf, such as an artist or a makeup designer.


The digital image 702 may be received by the application system 200 by any of multiple image receiving means 712, shown in FIG. 3, known and not yet known. For example, it may be sent to the application system 200, shown in FIG. 2, by e-mail and read automatically by an application program. It may be loaded from a diskette or other storage device and read by an appropriate storage device reader. Moreover, it may be created by a device or software application attached to the application system 200, such as a digital camera or computer graphics program, and automatically stored by software in storage 250.


Moreover, multiple digital images 702 may be received by the application system 200 to derive a single model for reconstruction. For example, the application algorithm 230 can average multiple digital images 702 to derive more representative values for features in the captured digital data, their locations, and their reflectance patterns, to improve the quality of the printable reconstruction image 708.


Another embodiment comprises scanner 2222, shown in FIG. 3, so that a non-digital image 714 may be scanned and digitized to create a digital image 702 that can be stored in storage 250, for use as a model for reconstruction.


To use images created through other methods, the present invention employs digital image feature recognition software 710 that identifies features in one or more received digital images 702. In an embodiment, this digital image feature recognition software 710 employs the techniques for the analysis of reflectance patterns explained in detail above, but applied to digital images. In other embodiments, it may use other techniques for feature recognition, for example Optasia™, the model-based feature-recognition platform developed by Image Metrics, Plc. The “Technical White Paper” on the Image Metrics website states that, “The Optasia engine can perform rapid model-to-image matching regardless of the model type, including those with high-frequency elements such as texture.” These other techniques may be used in combination with the techniques for the analysis of reflectance patterns explained above or independently of them.


The digital image feature recognition software 710 is used to create a digital image feature map 704 that identifies features in the digital image 702, their locations, and their reflectance patterns.


The application algorithm 230 in turn creates a frexel feature map 706 from data captured for the person scanned, as explained above. The frexel feature map 706 identifies features in that captured data, their locations, and their reflectance patterns.


The application algorithm 230 then compares the analogous information in the digital image feature map 704 and the frexel feature map 706 and uses the data in the digital image feature map 704 as a model to reconstruct the data in the frexel feature map 706. In an embodiment, this reconstruction can be accomplished by subtracting the frexel values from the analogous digital image values to derive the values of a reconstruction image.


For example, an eyebrow that has become fainter in the frexel feature map 706 may be reconstructed, with pixel-level precision, from a darker eyebrow present in the digital image feature map 704. Skin discolored from burns can be altered to more of its previous color.


The application algorithm 230 uses this reconstruction to define a printable reconstruction image 708 that is used as a basis to apply an RMA to an area of skin 302, typically by inkjet printing, as explained above.


Enhancement System for Changing a First Person's Appearance Based on a Digital Image of a Second Person


In an embodiment, the digital image 702 shown in FIG. 1 may be that of another person obtained through the system and method of the present invention, so that it provides the appropriate data needed for the enhancements to be made to the first person.



FIG. 1 also illustrates an embodiment of a system for changing the appearance of features using the cosmetic system explained with reference to FIG. 48 in the cross-referenced application U.S. 60/889,298. In this embodiment, the digital image 702 generally represents a second person whose appearance is more desirable for some purpose than the appearance of the first person. It may, for example, represent a second person who is younger, healthier or otherwise more attractive than the first person. If a first person's eyebrows are too light and lack an attractive shape, for example, a model digital image 702 of an actress with dark and well arched eyebrows may be used, when that model digital image 702 has been previously captured and stored in storage 250. Thus, a printable enhancement image 234 may be calculated and applied to the first person to morph the first person's eyebrows so that they look more like the second person's eyebrows.


For example, the distinctive arch of Nicole Kidman's eyebrow can be used as a model to enhance millions of girls next door by making their eyebrows of more arched. Or Catherine Zeta Jones's olive complexion, individual beauty marks, and full crimson lips can lend those girls a degree of her special charm.


On the other hand, model digital image 702 may represent a second person whose appearance is older and more responsible looking that the first person's, for example for the purpose of a job interview when the first person is very young and wants to look more mature.


The model digital image 702 may further represent a particular kind of appearance of any second person desired to serve as a model for the enhancements to the first person. For example, the model digital image 702 may be one of Nicole Kidman made up to have a special look for a formal event.


Filtering techniques may be used to determine the degree of similarity to be achieved. With no filtering, a very close resemblance between the second and first person may be achieved, depending on the original similarity between the two people. A higher degree of filtering may achieve a softer suggestion of similarity.


Topographic aspects of features can also be enhanced to degrees. On the first person's face, for example, cheekbones can be darkened to make them appear more like those of a second person with prominent, attractive cheekbones.


In another embodiment, multiple digital images of the second person may be used to derive a model digital image 702, useful for enhancements, for example by averaging the relevant values of those images. In addition, a frexel on the first person may be enhanced by using data from different but relevant frexels on the second person. For example, a frexel representing a point on a cheek on a first person may be enhanced on the basis of one or more model digital images 702 showing frexels or frexels on different points of the body of the second person.


In still another embodiment, a computer display 102 (not shown) and an interface 104 (not shown), for example a keyboard, may be used to allow a first person to select a stored model digital image 702 of a second person, or elements from that model digital image 702 or from multiple stored images, to derive a basis for one or more enhancements, as will be evident to those skilled in the art.


In other embodiments, the digital image 702 may be created remotely on a first instance of the present invention and transferred by any method, known to those skilled in the art or not yet known, to computing environment 100, which represents a second instance of the present invention. For example, it may be sent over the Internet from a remote computer to computing environment 100. It may be loaded onto computing environment 100 by means of a diskette. It may also be transferred through wireless technology, as well as by many other means.



FIG. 4 illustrates other embodiments in which the system comprises means for incorporating images not created by the system and method of the present invention to create a printable enhancement image 234. The elements shown in FIG. 4 are explained above in connection with FIG. 3.


DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT—RECONSTRUCTION EXAMPLE


FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of a process for reconstruction using the system shown in FIG. 2.


Step 730 in FIG. 5—Derive a digital image 702 showing a person's desired appearance.


As explained above, the digital image 702 may have been stored previously by application system 200, shown in FIG. 2. In addition, it can be derived from elements of one or multiple digital images stored previously, for example through averaging them.


Step 732 in FIG. 5—Scan a Frexel of the Person.


The application system 200, shown in FIG. 2 and explained in detail above, scans a frexel of the person.


Step 734 in FIG. 5—Use the data in the digital image 702 as a model to reconstruct the data in the frexel.


The application algorithm 230, shown in FIG. 2, compares the analogous information in the digital image 702 and in the frexel and uses the data in the digital image 702 as a model to reconstruct the data in the frexel. For example, this can be done by subtracting the frexel values from the analogous digital image values.


Step 736 in FIG. 5—Define a printable reconstruction image 708 from the reconstructed data.


The reconstructed values derived in Step 734 are treated as a printable reconstruction image 708.


Step 738 in FIG. 5—Apply the RMA to the frexel to create the reconstruction.


The application system 200, shown in FIG. 2, applies the RMA to the frexel, typically by inkjet printing, to accomplish the desired reconstruction.


DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT—USING IMAGES CREATED BY OTHER METHODS


FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a process for reconstruction using images not obtained by the general system and method of the present invention described above.


Step 740 in FIG. 6—Derive a digital image 702 showing a person's desired appearance.


As explained above, the digital image 702 can be received by the application system 200 shown in FIG. 2, or created by scanning a non-digital image 714, shown in FIG. 3. It can also be derived from multiple digital images, for example through averaging them. It may represent a prior image of the person or an image of how the person would like to be seen, for example one designed by a makeup artist.


Step 742 in FIG. 6—Create a digital image feature map 704.


The digital image feature recognition software 710, shown in FIG. 3, creates a digital image feature map 704 that identifies features in the digital image 702, their locations, and their reflectance patterns.


Step 744 in FIG. 6—Scan a frexel of the person.


The application system 200, shown in FIG. 2 and explained above, scans a frexel of the person.


Step 746 in FIG. 6—Create a frexel feature map 706.


The application algorithm 230, shown in FIG. 3, creates a frexel feature map 706 from data captured for the person scanned. The frexel feature map 706 identifies features in that captured data, their locations, and their reflectance patterns.


Step 748 in FIG. 6—Use the data in the digital image feature map 704 as a model to reconstruct the data in the frexel feature map 706.


The application algorithm 230, shown in FIG. 3, compares the analogous information in the digital image feature map 704 and in the frexel feature map 706 and uses the data in the digital image feature map 704 as a model to reconstruct the data in the frexel feature map 706. For example, this can be done by subtracting the frexel values from the analogous digital image values.


Step 750 in FIG. 6—Define a printable reconstruction image 708 from the reconstructed data.


The reconstructed values derived in Step 748 are treated as a printable reconstruction image 708.


Step 752 in FIG. 6—Apply the RMA to the frexel to create the reconstruction.


The application system 200, shown in FIG. 2, applies the RMA to the frexel, typically by inkjet printing, to accomplish the desired reconstruction.


Advantages of Reconstruction


The advantages of the reconstruction system and method described above are that it enables RMAs to be applied more automatically and more precisely, at the pixel level, to reconstruct the appearance of people's features, based on the appearance of those features in digital images.


Alternate Reconstruction Embodiments

In addition, this process may be usefully applied to other substances besides RMAs. For example human skin and artificial reconstruction materials may be applied.


DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT—PROCESS FOR ENHANCING A FIRST PERSON'S FEATURES BASED ON A DIGITAL IMAGE OF A SECOND PERSON


FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of a process for enhancement of a first person's features based on a digital image of a second person.


Step 830 in FIG. 7—Derive a model digital image 702.


As explained above, the model digital image 702 may be created by the application system 200 shown in FIG. 1. For example, it may represent a digital image of an actress with a special look designed by a makeup artist, captured by the system and method of the present invention. It may also received by the application system 200 from any of multiple sources, and it may be derived from multiple images, for example through averaging them.


Step 832 in FIG. 7—Scan a frexel of the first person.


The application system 200, shown in FIG. 1 and explained in detail above, scans a frexel of the first person.


Step 834 in FIG. 7—Use the data in the model digital image 702 as a model to calculate an enhancement in the frexel of the first person.


The application algorithm 230, shown in FIG. 1, compares the analogous information in the model digital image 702 and in the frexel of the first person and uses the data in the model digital image 702 as a model to enhance the data in the frexel of the first person. For example, this can be done by subtracting the frexel values from the analogous model digital image values. As explained above, the values of the enhancement image may be filtered by a percentage to prevent exact copying of the model digital image 702.


Step 836 in FIG. 7—Define a printable enhancement image 234 from the enhancement data.


The enhancement values derived in Step 734 are treated as a printable enhancement image 234.


Step 838 in FIG. 7—Apply the RMA to the frexel to make the enhancement.


The application system 200, shown in FIG. 1, applies the RMA to the frexel on the first person, typically by inkjet printing, to accomplish the desired enhancement.


DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT—ENHANCEMENT PROCESS WITH IMAGES CREATED BY OTHER METHODS


FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of a process for enhancement of a first person using images of a second person that are not created by the general system and method of the present invention described above.


Step 840 in FIG. 8—Derive a model digital image 702 of a second person.


As explained above, the model digital image 702 can be received by the application system 200 shown in FIG. 1 or created by scanning a non-digital image 714, shown in FIG. 4. It can also be derived from multiple digital images, for example through averaging them.


Step 842 in FIG. 8—Create a digital image feature map 704.


The digital image feature recognition software 710, shown in FIG. 4, creates a digital image feature map 704 that identifies features in the model digital image 702, their locations, and their reflectance patterns.


Step 844 in FIG. 8—Scan a frexel of the first person.


The application system 200, shown in FIG. 1 and explained in detail above, scans a frexel of the first person.


Step 846 in FIG. 8—Create a frexel feature map 706.


The application algorithm 230, shown in FIG. 4, creates a frexel feature map 706 from data captured for the first person. The frexel feature map 706 identifies features in that captured data, their locations, and their reflectance patterns.


Step 848 in FIG. 8—Use the data in the digital image feature map 704 as a model to enhance the data in the frexel feature map 706.


The application algorithm 230, shown in FIG. 4, compares the analogous information in the digital image feature map 704 and in the frexel feature map 706 and uses the data in the digital image feature map 704 as a model to make an enhancement in the frexel feature map 706. For example, this can be done by subtracting the frexel values from the analogous digital image values. As explained above, the values of the enhancement image may be filtered by a percentage to prevent exact copying of the model digital image 702.


Step 850 in FIG. 8—Define a printable enhancement image 234 from the enhancement data.


The enhancement values derived in Step 848 are treated as a printable enhancement image 234.


Step 852 in FIG. 8—Apply the RMA to the frexel to make the enhancement.


The application system 200, shown in FIG. 1, applies the RMA to the frexel, typically by inkjet printing, to accomplish the desired enhancement.


It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that different embodiments of the present invention may employ a wide range of possible hardware and of software techniques. The scope of the current invention is not limited by the specific examples described above.

Claims
  • 1. A system to change an appearance of a region of skin of a person, the system comprising: at least one reflectance modifying agent application element, the reflectance modifying agent application element being operable to apply one or more reflectance modifying agents to frexels of the skin of the person; anda computing device in communication with the at least one reflectance modifying agent application element, the computing device being operable to perform operations comprising: receiving a desired image associated with the region of the skin, the desired image depicting one or more model features of skin,receiving a first image depicting features of the region of the skin, the features being associated with a current appearance of the region of the skin,comparing the desired image to the first image to determine a difference between a plurality of frexels within the first image and the desired image, andproviding the difference between the plurality of frexels, to the at least one reflectance modifying agent application element to apply the reflectance modifying agents to at least one of the plurality of frexels based on the difference, the reflectance modifying agents being applied to emulate the one or more model features of the desired image within the region of the skin of the person.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the computing device is further operable to provide a digital image feature map based on the first image.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first image comprises a digital image of the person.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the first image comprises a digital image of a region of human skin of a second person.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the first image comprises reflectance and topographical data.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the computing device is further operable to compare a digital feature map to a frexel feature map in order to generate a reconstruction image, the digital feature map being provided based on the desired image, the frexel feature map being provided based on the first image, the reconstruction image being generated by: using the digital feature map as a model to derive enhancement values; andgenerating the reconstruction image as an enhancement image based on the derived enhancement values.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the computing device is further operable to perform operations comprising: recognizing features in digital images;creating a digital image feature map from each of the digital images;creating a frexel feature map; andgenerating a reconstruction image as an enhancement image based on a difference between values in the digital image feature map and values in the frexel feature map.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein generating the reconstruction image comprises applying a filtering ratio to the digital image feature map.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein a digital image feature map is provided based on a plurality of digital images, the reflectance modifying agent being applied to one or more frexels of the plurality of frexels based on the digital image feature map.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the digital image feature map comprises data provided as an average of data across the plurality of digital images.
  • 11. A computer-implemented method to change an appearance of a region of skin of a person, the method being executed using one or more processors and comprising: receiving, by the one or more processors, a desired image associated with the region of the skin, the desired image depicting one or more model features of;receiving a first image depicting features of the region of the skin, the features being associated with a current appearance of the region of the skin;comparing, by the one or more processors, the desired image to the first image to determine a difference between a plurality of frexels within the first image and the desired image; andproviding, by the one or more processors, the difference between the plurality of frexels, to at least one reflectance modifying agent application element to apply reflectance modifying agents to at least one of the plurality of frexels based on the difference, the reflectance modifying agents being applied to emulate the one or more model features of the desired image within the region of the skin of the person.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising providing a digital image feature map based on the first image.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the first image comprises a digital image of the person.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the first image comprises a digital image of a region of human skin of a second person.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the first image comprises reflectance and topographical data.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, further comprising comparing a digital feature map to a frexel feature map in order to generate a reconstruction image, the digital feature map being provided based on the desired image, the frexel feature map being provided based on the first image, the reconstruction image being generated by: using the digital feature map as a model to derive enhancement values; andgenerating the reconstruction image as an enhancement image based on the derived enhancement values.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, further comprising: recognizing features in digital images;creating a digital image feature map from each of the digital images;creating a frexel feature map; andgenerating a reconstruction image as an enhancement image based on a difference between values in the digital image feature map and values in the frexel feature map.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein generating the reconstruction image comprises applying a filtering ratio to the digital image feature map.
  • 19. The method of claim 11, wherein a digital image feature map is provided based on a plurality of digital images, the reflectance modifying agent being applied to one or more frexels of the plurality of frexels based on the digital image feature map.
  • 20. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium coupled to one or more processors and having instructions stored thereon which when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving a desired image associated with the region of the skin, the desired image depicting one or more model features of skin;receiving a first image depicting features of the region of the skin, the features being associated with a current appearance of the region of the skin;comparing the desired image to the first image to determine a difference between a plurality of frexels within the first image and the desired image; andproviding the difference between the plurality of frexels to at least one reflectance modifying agent application element to apply reflectance modifying agents to at least one of the plurality of frexels based on the difference, the reflectance modifying agents being applied to emulate the one or more model features of the desired image within the region of the skin of the person.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/269,091, filed Sep. 19, 2016, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/068,894, filed Oct. 31, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,449,382, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/476,320, filed May 21, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,582,830, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/029,534 filed Feb. 12, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,184,901, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/889,297 filed Feb. 12, 2007 by the present inventors for “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING A REFLECTANCE MODIFYING AGENT TO RECONSTRUCT A PERSON'S APPEARANCE BASED ON A DIGITAL IMAGE OF THE PERSON” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/889,298 filed Feb. 12, 2007 by the present inventors for “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING A REFLECTANCE MODIFYING AGENT TO ENHANCE A PERSON'S APPEARANCE BASED ON A DIGITAL IMAGE OF ANOTHER PERSON”, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety by applicants. This patent application incorporates by reference the specification, drawings, and claims of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/503,806 filed Aug. 14, 2006 by the present inventors for “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING A REFLECTANCE MODIFYING AGENT TO IMPROVE THE VISUAL ATTRACTIVENESS OF HUMAN SKIN”.

US Referenced Citations (150)
Number Name Date Kind
4190056 Tapper et al. Feb 1980 A
4401122 Clark Aug 1983 A
4628356 Spillman et al. Dec 1986 A
4771060 Nakagawa Sep 1988 A
4807991 Carew Feb 1989 A
4882492 Schlager Nov 1989 A
5027817 John Jul 1991 A
5156479 Iizuka Oct 1992 A
5241468 Kenet Aug 1993 A
5268166 Barnett et al. Dec 1993 A
5431911 Reynolds Jul 1995 A
5836872 Kenet Nov 1998 A
5931166 Weber et al. Aug 1999 A
6021344 Lui et al. Feb 2000 A
6067996 Weber et al. May 2000 A
6111653 Bucknell et al. Aug 2000 A
6122042 Wunderman et al. Sep 2000 A
6151031 Atkins Nov 2000 A
6208749 Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. Mar 2001 B1
6250927 Narlo Jun 2001 B1
6286517 Weber et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292277 Kikinis Sep 2001 B1
6293284 Rigg Sep 2001 B1
6295737 Patton et al. Oct 2001 B2
6312124 Desormeaux Nov 2001 B1
6341831 Weber et al. Jan 2002 B1
6385487 Henley May 2002 B1
6436127 Anderson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6477410 Henley Nov 2002 B1
6487440 Deckert et al. Nov 2002 B2
6502583 Utsugi Jan 2003 B1
6543893 Desormeaux Apr 2003 B2
6554452 Bourn et al. Apr 2003 B1
6575751 Lehman Jun 2003 B1
6578276 Patton Jun 2003 B2
6641578 Mukai Nov 2003 B2
6706035 Cense et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719467 Hess et al. Apr 2004 B2
6810130 Aubert et al. Oct 2004 B1
7027619 Pavlidis et al. Apr 2006 B2
7233693 Momma Jun 2007 B2
7369692 Shirai et al. May 2008 B2
7382400 Sablak Jun 2008 B2
7433102 Takahashi et al. Oct 2008 B2
7602942 Bazakos et al. Oct 2009 B2
7890152 Edgar et al. Feb 2011 B2
8007062 Edgar et al. Aug 2011 B2
8026942 Payonk Sep 2011 B2
8027505 Edgar Sep 2011 B2
8182425 Stamatas May 2012 B2
8184901 Edgar et al. May 2012 B2
8231292 Rabe Jul 2012 B2
8384793 Ciuc Feb 2013 B2
8464732 Wong Jun 2013 B2
8582830 Edgar et al. Nov 2013 B2
8610767 Uzenbajakava et al. Dec 2013 B2
8695610 Samain Apr 2014 B2
8899242 Wong Dec 2014 B2
8915562 Edgar Dec 2014 B2
8942775 Edgar Jan 2015 B2
8977389 Witchell Mar 2015 B2
9247802 Edgar Feb 2016 B2
9277799 Takaleh Mar 2016 B2
9333156 Ito May 2016 B2
9449382 Edgar Sep 2016 B2
10016046 Edgar Jul 2018 B2
20010040982 Kim Nov 2001 A1
20020054714 Hawkins et al. May 2002 A1
20020064302 Massengill May 2002 A1
20020070988 Desormeaux Jun 2002 A1
20020081003 Sobol Jun 2002 A1
20020105662 Patton Aug 2002 A1
20020107456 Leveque Aug 2002 A1
20020128780 De Rigal et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020155069 Pruche et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020172419 Lin et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020176926 Pletcher et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030010083 Minnerop et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030045799 Bazin et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050561 Bazin et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030053664 Pavlidis et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030053685 Lestideau Mar 2003 A1
20030060810 Syrowicz et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030062058 Utsugi Apr 2003 A1
20030063102 Rubinstenn et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030067545 Giron et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030100837 Lys et al. May 2003 A1
20030108228 Garnier Jun 2003 A1
20030130575 Desai Jul 2003 A1
20030208190 Roberts et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030223622 Simon Dec 2003 A1
20030229514 Brown Dec 2003 A2
20040005086 Wolff et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040007827 Hahn Jan 2004 A1
20040073186 Cameron Apr 2004 A1
20040078278 Dauga et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040125996 Eddowes et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040170337 Simon et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174525 Mullani Sep 2004 A1
20040179101 Bodnar et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040201694 Gartstein et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040236229 Freeman et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040254546 Lefebvre Dec 2004 A1
20040257439 Shirai et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267189 Mavor et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004475 Giron Jan 2005 A1
20050010102 Marchesini et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050019285 Lee et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050053628 Montanari et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050053637 Ma Or et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063197 Nightingale et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069208 Morisada Mar 2005 A1
20050154382 Altshuler Jul 2005 A1
20060104507 John May 2006 A1
20060153470 Simon et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060228037 Simon Oct 2006 A1
20060228038 Simon et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060228039 Simon et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060228040 Simon et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060282137 Nightingale et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070016078 Hoyt et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070035815 Edgar et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047761 Wasilunas et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070049832 Edgar et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070134192 Shimizu Jun 2007 A1
20070203413 Frangioni Aug 2007 A1
20070255589 Rodriguez Nov 2007 A1
20080192999 Edgar et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080193195 Edgar et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080194971 Edgar et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080219528 Edgar et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090025747 Edgar et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090209833 Waagen et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090231356 Barnes Sep 2009 A1
20100114265 Lechthaler May 2010 A1
20100139682 Edgar et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100224205 Mitra et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100224211 Rabe et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110124989 Edgar et al. May 2011 A1
20110270200 Edgar Nov 2011 A1
20130149365 Rajagopal et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130302078 Edgar Nov 2013 A1
20140050377 Edgar et al. Feb 2014 A1
20150196109 Edgar Jul 2015 A1
20150237991 Edgar Aug 2015 A1
20150359315 Rabe Dec 2015 A1
20150359714 Rabe Dec 2015 A1
20170004635 Edgar Jan 2017 A1
20170256084 Iglehart Sep 2017 A1
20180033161 Nichol Feb 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
101287607 Oct 2008 CN
202004003148 Mar 2005 DE
1184663 Mar 2002 EP
1210909 Jun 2002 EP
1304056 Apr 2003 EP
1495781 Jan 2005 EP
1677254 Jul 2006 EP
1763380 Mar 2007 EP
2810761 Dec 2001 FR
59171280 Sep 1984 JP
05281041 Oct 1993 JP
06201468 Jul 1994 JP
11019050 Jan 1999 JP
11019051 Jan 1999 JP
2000139846 May 2000 JP
2000331167 Nov 2000 JP
2001112722 Apr 2001 JP
2002017689 Jan 2002 JP
2002263084 Sep 2002 JP
2003052642 Feb 2003 JP
2003057169 Feb 2003 JP
2003057170 Feb 2003 JP
2003513735 Apr 2003 JP
2003519019 Jun 2003 JP
2003210248 Jul 2003 JP
2004501707 Jan 2004 JP
2004105748 Apr 2004 JP
2004315416 Nov 2004 JP
2004315426 Nov 2004 JP
2008526284 Jul 2006 JP
2006271654 Oct 2006 JP
2007231883 Sep 2007 JP
2008526241 Jul 2008 JP
2336866 Oct 2008 RU
WO2001026735 Apr 2001 WO
WO2001049360 Jul 2001 WO
WO2001077976 Oct 2001 WO
WO2004028420 Apr 2004 WO
WO2004091590 Oct 2004 WO
WO2004095372 Nov 2004 WO
WO2005123172 Dec 2005 WO
WO2006008414 Jan 2006 WO
WO2006074881 Jul 2006 WO
WO2007022095 Feb 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (63)
Entry
“Lehrstuhl für Optik 2004 Annual Report” Jun. 2005 (2005-2006), Lehrstuhl Für Optik, Institute Für Optik, Information and Photonik, Max-Planck-Forschungsgruppe, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany, XP002460048, 2 pages.
EPO Office Action in App. No. 06 801 295.4, dated Feb. 3, 2010, 3 pages.
Authorized Officer Nora Lindner, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031441, dated Feb. 12, 2008, 9 pages.
Russian Official Action (including translation) for Application No. 2008109234, dated Apr. 2, 2009, 7 pages.
EPO Office Action in Application No. 06 801 295.4, dated Jun. 10, 2008, 3 pages.
Authorized Officer Moritz Knupling, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031441, dated Dec. 7, 2007, 2 pages.
Authorized Officer Lars-Oliver Romich, International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031441, dated Dec. 7, 2007, 14 pages.
Notification of the First Office Action (including translation) in Application No. 200680037564.6, dated Jul. 31, 2009, 7 pages.
Examiner's First Report in Application No. 2006279800, dated Feb. 2, 2011, 2 pages.
Russian Deputy Chief S.V. Artamonov, Decision on Grant Patent for Invention (including translation) in Application 2008109235, dated Feb. 19, 2009.
Authorized Officer Dorothee Mulhausen, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031657, dated Feb. 12, 2008, 7 pages.
Authorized Officer Laure Acquaviva, Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, where applicable, Protest Fees International Application No. PCT/US2008/053527, dated Jul. 7, 2008, 8 pages.
Examiner's First Report in Application No. 2006279652, dated Jan. 28, 2011, 2 pages.
Notification of the First Office Action (including translation) in Application No. 200680037560.8, dated Jul. 17, 2009, 8 pages.
EPO Office Action in Application No. 06 789 746.2, dated Apr. 3, 2009, 3 pages.
Authorized Officer Wolfhard Wehr, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031657, dated Dec. 20, 2006, 2 pages.
Authorized Officer Athina Nickitas-Etienne, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2008/053640, dated Aug. 19, 2009, 5 pages.
Authorized Officer Michael Eberwein, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/053640, dated Jun. 3, 2008, 9 pages.
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 08 729 481.5, dated Aug. 23, 2010, 5 pages.
Authorized Officer Jens Clevorn, International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2008/053528, dated Nov. 13, 2008, 4 pages.
Authorized Officer Jens Clevorn, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2008/053528, dated Aug. 11, 2009, 9 pages.
Notification of First Office Action for Application No. 200880009579.0, dated Jul. 14, 2010, 10 pages.
Authorized Officer Simin Baharlou, International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2008/065168, dated Dec. 1, 2009, 8 pages.
Anonimous, “Circular Polarizer Films,” Internet Article, [Online] 2005, http://www.optigrafix.com/circular.htm [retrieved on Sep. 5, 2008].
Authorized Officer Carlos Nicolas, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2008/065168, dated Sep. 19, 2008, 13 pages.
Examination Report for European Application No. 08769826.2, dated Jul. 16, 2013, 6 pages.
Mike Topping et al., “The Development of Handy 1, A Robotic System to Assist the Severely Disabled,” ICORR '99, Sixth International Conference of Rehabilitation Robotics, Stanford, CA, Jul. 1-2, 1999, pp. 244-249.
Robot News, “Handy1—Rehabilitation robot for the severely disabled; helping you to eat and drink and brush and even do make-up!”, posted on Apr. 3, 2006, http://robotnews.wordpress.com/2006/04/03/handy1-rehabiliation-robot-for-the-severely-disabledhelping-you-to-eat-and-drink-and-brush-and-even-do-make-up/, 6 pages.
Mike Topping, “An Overview of the Development of Handy 1, a Rehabilitation Robot to Assist the Severely Disabled” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol. 34, No. 3, 2002, pp. 253-263.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Application No. 2008-526241, dated Aug. 31, 2011, 7 pages.
Notification of the First Office Action (including translation) in Application No. 200880009069.3, dated Jul. 1, 2011, 8 pages.
EPO Office Action in App. No. 06 801 295.4, dated Oct. 10, 2011, 5 pages.
Cula O G et al., “Bidirectional Imaging and Modeling of Skin Texture,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA, vol. 51, No. 12, Dec. 1, 2004, pp. 2148-2159.
Second Examiner's Report in Application No. 2006279652, dated Nov. 3, 2011, 2 pages.
Francois-Xavier Bon et al., “Quantitative and Kinetic Evolution of Wound Healing through Image Analysis,” 2000 IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 2000, pp. 767-772.
Divya Railan et al., “Laser Treatment of Acne, Psoriasis, Leukoderma and Scars,” Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, Dec. 2008, pp. 285-291.
Robert J. Chiu et al., “Fractionated Photothermolysis: The Fraxel 1550-nm Glass Fiber Laser Treatment,” Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America (2007), vol. 15, Issue 2, May 2007, pp. 229-237.
Hans Laubach et al., “Effects of Skin Temperature on Lesion Size in Fractional Photothermolysis,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Jan. 2007, pp. 14-18.
Oana G. Cula et al., “Bidirectional Imaging and Modeling of Skin Texture,” IEEE Engineering of Medicine and Biology Society, Nov. 2004, pp. 1-6.
Examiner's First Report in Application No. 2008260040, dated Apr. 13, 2012, 2 pages.
Notice to File a Response in Application No. 10-2008-7006079, dated Aug. 6, 2012, 10 pages.
Notice to File a Response in Application No. 10-2008-7006079, dated Jun. 25, 2013, 5 pages.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Application No. 2008-526284, dated Apr. 18, 2012, 10 pages.
Notification of the Second Office Action for Application No. 200880009579.0, dated Mar. 1, 2012, 4 pages.
Office Action for Application No. 2009148819, dated May 30, 2012, 7 pages.
Notification of the Third Office Action for Application No. 200880009579.0, dated Jan. 7, 2013, 8 pages.
Notice to File a Response in Application No. 10-2008-7006041, dated Jan. 29, 2013, 10 pages.
Chujit Jeamsinkul, “MasqueArray Automatic Makeup Selector/Applicator”, Nov. 11, 1998, Rochester Institute of Technology, 79 pages.
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-549296, dated Apr. 30, 2013, 12 pages.
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2009-7019063, dated Mar. 24, 2014, 8 pages.
Examination Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,618,706, dated Jul. 31, 2014, 3 pages.
Weyrich et al., “Analysis of Human Faces using a Measurement-Based Skin Reflectance Model,” Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. 2006, pp. 1-12 (1013-1024).
Donner et al., “A Layered, Heterogeneous Reflectance Model for Acquiring and Rendering Human Skin” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 27, No. 5, Article 140, Publication date: Dec. 2008 pp. 1-12.
Examination Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,618,519, dated Jan. 16, 2015, 2 pages.
Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2013200395, dated Feb. 5, 2015, 4 pages.
Examination Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,618,706, dated Jul. 30, 2015, 4 pages.
Examination Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,618,519, dated Jul. 9, 2015, 3 pages.
Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2014200087, dated Jun. 30, 2015, 3 pages.
Examination Report for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,618,706, dated Jun. 17, 2016, 3 pages.
Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 5301/CHENP/2009, dated Jan. 19, 2017, 7 pages.
European Search Report for Application No. 11160161.3 dated Mar. 31, 2017, 4 pages.
European Examination Report for Application No. 11160161.3 dated Apr. 11, 2017, 6 pages.
European Examination Report for Application No. 11160161.3 dated Mar. 22, 2018, 6 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180315219 A1 Nov 2018 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60889298 Feb 2007 US
60889297 Feb 2007 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 15269091 Sep 2016 US
Child 16028948 US
Parent 14068894 Oct 2013 US
Child 15269091 US
Parent 13476320 May 2012 US
Child 14068894 US
Parent 12029534 Feb 2008 US
Child 13476320 US