The present disclosure relates to applying patterns to articles and inspecting the applied patterns for accuracy. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to a system and method for applying patterns, such as by laser irradiation, to discrete consumable or non-consumable articles and inspecting the presence and correctness of the applied patterns.
The reaction of a solid surface to laser irradiation depends on many factors, including laser wavelength and power, exposure time, and optical properties. In many cases, the marking resulting from these interactions has a relatively low (50% or less) contrast. That makes it hard to use a regular inspection camera and software algorithms for quality control. In addition to high-resolution cameras, it typically requires special instruments to provide a uniform illumination of the markings under consideration (e.g. diffuse dome lights, optical filters and diffusers, etc.). The equipment is bulky and hard to install on a real marking system due to space constraints.
Conventional laser-marked soft gelatin capsules illustrate the difficulties. By way of example, the curved surface of the capsules focuses the light and creates bright spots (see, for example, reflections 140 in
Certain deficiencies of the prior art are overcome by the provision of systems and methods for applying patterns on consumable or non-consumable articles and inspection thereof as disclosed herein.
Further advantages of the present invention may become apparent to those skilled in the art with the benefit of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The present disclosure describes, in part, new systems and methods for creating a high contrast image that can be used for pattern analysis (e.g. OCR, quality control, etc.) of low contrast laser marking, micromachining and the like.
Referring now to the drawings, like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding features throughout the several views.
With reference to
The irradiation zone 104 may be configured to receive a set 126 of articles 102 therein, wherein each article has an article surface 106. To facilitate this receipt, a transport element 134 with an array of article retention pockets 136 may be provided. The transport element 134 may be part of a conveyor subsystem such as a conveyer belt or transport wheel, or may be a tray that is manually (e.g. by hand) removable from and insertable into the irradiation zone.
The laser transmission element 108 may be configured to transmit at least one beam 110 of laser energy toward the irradiation zone 104 to irradiate the set of articles with the laser energy during an irradiation period. Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In particular embodiments of the system 100, the post-irradiation patterns 114 may be a respective marking. A marking may comprise, for example, one or more human or machine-readable alpha-numeric characters, or a 2-dimensional QR or bar code. In such embodiments, during the irradiation period the article surfaces 106 may have a first background luminance and the localized illuminations 112 may have an illumination luminance. After the irradiation period, the article surfaces 106 may have a second background luminance and the markings 114 may have a marking luminance which is different from the second background luminance. An illumination contrast may be defined by a relative difference between the first background luminance and the illumination luminance, and a marking contrast may be defined by a relative difference between the second background luminance and the marking luminance. The illumination contrast may preferably be at least four times greater in magnitude than the marking contrast. In some embodiments of the system 100, the illumination contrast may be 450%, 500%, 550% or even 600% greater than the marking contrast.
The illumination contrast and the marking contrast may preferably be defined, for example, as a relative difference between background (Lb) and marking luminance (Lm) calculated as (Lb-Lm)/Lb for the darker marking on a light background and (Lm-Lb)/Lm for the brighter marking on the darker background. That is the same as (L max−L min)/L max, where L min and L max is minimum and maximum luminance within the marking and its vicinity.
Since the illumination contrast is substantially greater than the marking contrast, optical character recognition (OCR) performed on the illumination patterns can have more tightly defined pass-fail parameters. This, in turn, ensures fewer acceptances of incorrectly marked articles without increasing the rejections of correctly marked ones. OCR error occurs when an incorrect marking is not identified and is therefore accepted as good, or a correct marking is not recognized and is therefore rejected as bad. OCR accuracy then may be defined herein as (N-Ne)/N, where N is the total number of markings evaluated in the OCR process and Ne is the total number of OCR errors. For practical purposes OCR accuracy calculation should preferably involve evaluation of at least 100 or at least 1000 articles.
In particular preferred embodiments of a system 100, each illumination pattern 120 may comprise at least one character, and the comparison may be configured to be performed by way of an OCR process having an OCR accuracy of at least 99%. This OCR accuracy may be based on at least 1000 said articles 102 consecutively subjected to the irradiation. Moreover, in particular preferred embodiments of a system 100, each illumination pattern 120 may comprise at least two characters, and the comparison may be configured to be performed by way of an OCR process having an OCR accuracy of at least 99.9% for at least 1000 said articles 102 consecutively subjected to said irradiating.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Depending upon the particular embodiment of the system 100, the post-irradiation pattern 114 may be a material void (for example, an etching into the article surface).
Depending upon the particular implementation of the system 100, the articles 102 may be consumable articles. The consumable articles may comprise pharmaceutical substances, for example, where the article 102 is a medicinal tablet, capsule or the like. In the alternative, the consumable articles 102 may be candies. It is also contemplated that, in particular implementations of a system 100, the articles 102 may be non-consumable articles such as those found in the medical device, electronics, aerospace or other industries.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In particular preferred implementations of the method 200, each illumination pattern 120 may comprise at least one character (for example, an alpha-numeric character in one or more languages, or a non-alphanumeric symbol, code or graphical design), and the step of comparing 212 may be performed by way of optical character recognition having an OCR accuracy of at least 99%. In such implementations, the optical character recognition may have an OCR accuracy of at least 99% for at least 1000 articles 102 consecutively subjected to the step of irradiating 208.
In certain preferred implementations of the method 200, each illumination pattern 120 may comprise at least two characters, and the step of comparing 212 may be performed by way of optical character recognition having an OCR accuracy of at least 99.9%. In such implementations, the optical character recognition may have an OCR accuracy of at least 99.9% for at least 1000 articles 102 consecutively subjected to the step of irradiating 208.
Referring it to
In particular implementations of the method 200, the post-irradiation patterns 120 may be markings. In such implementations, during the irradiation period the article surfaces 106 may have a first background luminance the localized illuminations 112 may have an illumination luminance. After the irradiation period, the article surfaces 106 may have a second background luminance and the markings 114 may have a marking luminance which is different from the second background luminance. An illumination contrast may be defined by a relative difference between the first background luminance and the illumination luminance, and a marking contrast may be defined by a relative difference between the second background luminance and the marking luminance. The illumination contrast may preferably be at least four times greater in magnitude than the marking contrast. In some implementations of the method 200, the illumination contrast may be 450%, 500%, 550% or even 600% the marking contrast.
With regard to the method 200, the illumination contrast and the marking contrast may preferably be defined, for example, as a relative difference between background (Lb) and marking luminance (Lm) calculated as (Lb-Lm)/Lb for the darker marking on a light background and (Lm-Lb)/Lm for the brighter marking on the darker background. That is the same as (L max−L min)/L max, where L min and L max is minimum and maximum luminance within the marking and its vicinity.
Referring to
Referring to
Depending upon the particular implementation of the method 200, the post-irradiation pattern 114 may be a material void (for example, an etching into the article surface).
Depending upon the particular implementation of the method 200, the articles 102 may be consumable articles. The consumable articles 102 may comprise pharmaceutical substances, for example, where the article 102 is a medicinal tablet, capsule or the like. In the alternative, the consumable articles 102 may be candies. It is also contemplated that, in particular implementations of a method 100, the articles 102 may be non-consumable articles such as those found in the medical device, electronics, aerospace or other industries.
In particular implementations of a system 100 or method 200, the interactions generate plasma, and that plasma generates the localized illuminations 112. Also, referring to
Referring to
In particular implementations of a method 200, the irradiation inspection image 118 may be used to analyze the articles 102 for surface defects or material impurities. In particular implementations of the system 100 or method 200, the processor element 122 may be configured to use the irradiation inspection image 118 to analyze the articles 102 for surface defects or material impurities.
In certain preferred implementations of a system 100 or method 200, no dichroic mirrors are included within the irradiation inspection element 116 or optically disposed between the irradiation zone 104 and any portion of the irradiation inspection element 116. Alternatively, or in addition, in particular preferred implementations of a system 100 or method 200, no scanners are included within the irradiation inspection element 116 or optically disposed between the irradiation zone 104 and any portion of the irradiation inspection element 116.
In particular preferred implementations of a system 100 or method 200, the beam 110 of laser energy may be in the Ultraviolet (UV) spectrum, and the article surface 106 may be a substrate layer containing titanium dioxide in sufficient quantity or density to cause a visible marking 114 to persist in the article surface 106 after the laser beam 110 interacts with the surface 106.
Advantageously, by capturing an inspection image during the actual laser marking, many of the deficiencies of the prior art are overcome, as intense light is emitted from the nearest vicinity of the laser-surface-contact points. In many embodiments of the system 100 and method 200, this light (e.g., from plasma) is so bright that it must be attenuated by, for example polarization filters. The higher-contrast image may be much more easily analyzed with any pattern recognition software.
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/816,055 filed Mar. 8, 2019, the contents which are incorporated by this reference in their entireties for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/021613 | 3/8/2020 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62816055 | Mar 2019 | US |